Transparency Obligation for Market Data under MiFIR

Similar documents
COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

The review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Price List to the Market Data Dissemination Agreement of Deutsche Börse AG

Opinion Amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/587 (RTS 1)

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics

Price List to the Market Data Dissemination Agreement of Deutsche Börse AG

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR post trading topics

(Text with EEA relevance)

Price List to the Non-Display Agreement of Deutsche Börse AG

Questions and Answers. On the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)

Questions and Answers. On the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)

MiFID 2/MiFIR Articles relevant to article The top 10 things every investment banker should know about MiFID 2. EU Council MiFID 2 general approach

Price List to the Non-Display Agreement of Deutsche Börse AG

MiFID II: What is new for buy side? Best Execution Topic 3

Questions and Answers. On the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)

The impact of MiFID II/MiFIR on Secondary Markets David Lawton Managing Director Alvarez & Marsal

Questions and Answers. On the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)

Questions and Answers. On the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Final Report Amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/587 (RTS 1)

Questions and Answers. On the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)

Questions and Answers. On the Benchmarks Regulation (BMR)

Managers will be prohibited from receiving any third-party inducements 1, unless an exception applies.

Deutsche Börse Group - Comments on ESMA Consultation Paper -

A8-0126/2. Amendment 2 Roberto Gualtieri on behalf of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

I) Background. Copyright 2017 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. and FIA, Inc

16523/12 OM/mf 1 DGG 1

Transactions Concluded at Eurex Deutschland and Eurex Zürich

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Managers will be prohibited from receiving any third-party inducements 1, unless an exception applies.

10 November InfoNet. MiFID II/R Seminar. Transparency. Sponsored by

Final Report CSDR Guidelines on Access by a CSD to the Transaction Feeds of a CCP or of a Trading Venue under Regulation (EU) No 909/2014

Nasdaq Nordics Introduction to the main MiFID II requirements.

ESRB response to ESMA on the temporary exclusion of exchange-traded derivatives from Articles 35 and 36 of MiFIR

Exemption of MiFIR access provisions for trading venues as regards exchange-traded derivatives Procedure / Policy

Market making agreements and schemes at WBAG RTS 8: Specifying the requirements on market making agreements and schemes

ECB-PUBLIC OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 27 November 2012

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR market structures topics

(Text with EEA relevance) (OJ L 173, , p. 84)

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR market structures topics

INTERNAL DEALING PROCEDURE

Financial Regulatory Alert

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

describe the main legal implications of different levels of segregation.

Flash News. ESMA releases its Final Technical Advice on MiFID II/MiFIR. Background. ESMA Final Technical Advice on investor protection topics

Deutsche Börse Group Response to European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) Consultation Paper ESMA/2012/236

DEUTSCHE BÖRSE AG Standard Product Codes for Electronic Reporting - SUB-VENDORS

Christos Gortsos Associate Professor of International Economic Law, Panteion University of Athens

Questions and Answers On ESMA s temporary product intervention measures on the marketing, distribution or sale of CFDs and Binary options to retail

Price List to the Non-Display Agreement of Deutsche Börse AG

Annual Reporting on the Quality of Execution Obtained

CITI MARKETS & SECURITIES SERVICES COMMERCIAL POLICY

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK. of 22 September on the designation of Lietuvos bankas as a resolution authority (CON/2015/33)

MiFID II/MIFIR Readiness

MiFID II pre and post trade transparency. Damian Carolan and Sidika Ulker 12 October 2017

MiFID II: Impact on LME members

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

eurexbondscircular 51/17

MiFID II for Non-EU Investment Banks, Brokers and Fund Managers

Xetra Circular 091/17

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Q1/2016 Results Analyst and Investor Conference Call. 28 April 2016

MiFID II 31 December MiFID II. Third country access

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR commodity derivatives topics

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics

Opinion. 17 June 2016 ESMA/2016/982

Analyst and Investor Conference Call Q4 and FY February 2012

EBA FINAL draft Regulatory Technical Standards

OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

16 th November European Parliament and the Council, of 23 June 2016, that amends, among others, the previous Regulation.

A Guide to the Implications of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) for Annual Reports of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)

LEI requirements under MiFID II

Public Consultation on the Review of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID)

Opinion On the European Commission s proposed amendments to SFTR reporting standards

decision-making process in accordance with Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No 2015/751

Deutsche Börse sets new record for revenue and earnings in 2007

a central counterparty, the registration and supervision of trade repositories and the requirements for trade repositories

SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANKING SYSTEMATIC INTERNALISER PRE-TRADE COMMERCIAL POLICY UNDER MIFID II / MIFIR 3 JANUARY 2018

Guidelines On the Process for the Calculation of the Indicators to Determine the Most Relevant Currencies in which Settlement Takes Place

AFME response to ESMA s Consultation Paper on amendments to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/588 (RTS 11)

Trade transparency and possible waivers and deferrals for non-equity instruments

CMC Europe position paper: proposed Benchmarks Regulation

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Frankfurt am Main, 23 March BVI s response to the ESA s consultation on EOS PRIIPs. General Comments

A8-0125/ Markets in financial instruments, market abuse and securities settlement

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR commodity derivatives topics

Annex A Application of the standstill direction to amendments made in Statutory Instruments and Exit Instruments amending technical standards

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR market structures topics

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR transparency topics

ING Bank N.V. Commercial Policy for the ING Systematic Internaliser

ING Bank N.V. Commercial Policy for the ING Systematic Internaliser

A guide on client impacts

THE INVESTMENT ASSOCIATION POSITION PAPER ON INTERNAL CROSSING BY ASSET MANAGERS

Questions and Answers On MiFID II and MiFIR commodity derivatives topics

Mahin Choudry Competition Division Financial Conduct Authority 25 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 5HS

ISDA commentary on Presidency MiFID2/MiFIR compromise texts as published on

Transcription:

Transparency Obligation for Market Data under MiFIR 3 January 2018 Contents Page 1. Regulatory Requirements for Market Data Provision 2 1.1. Overview of Regulatory Requirements 2 1.2. Legal Basis for the Provision of Real-time Data on a Reasonable Commercial Basis 3 2. Relevant Market Data Products and Scope of Description 4 3. General Cost Accounting Principles and applied Cost Allocation Methodology 5 3.1 General Accounting Principles at Deutsche Börse 5 3.2 Cost Accounting Methodology and Specific Principles 5 3.3 Cost Allocation for Real-time Market Data 6

Transparency obligation for market data under MiFIR Deutsche Börse AG 2 1. Regulatory Requirements for Market Data Provision 1.1. Overview of Regulatory Requirements Based on the Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 ( MiFIR ) 1 supplemented by the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/ 567 ( RTS ) 2 additional obligations for trading venues and investment firms operating a trading venue and systematic internalisers for the publication of market data have become effective on 3 January 2018. As outlined in Recital (1) of MiFIR the key objective was to strengthen transparency: The financial crisis has exposed weaknesses in the transparency of financial markets which can contribute to harmful socioeconomic effects. Strengthening transparency is one of the shared principles to strengthen the financial system as confirmed by the G20 Leaders statement in London on 2 April 2009. In order to strengthen the transparency and improve the functioning of the internal market for financial instruments, a new framework establishing uniform requirements for the transparency of transactions in markets for financial instruments should be put in place. Already in the past, real-time market data from exchange venues provided for a precedent of highly reliable and transparent data. The regulation aims to make market data more easily and readily available to users by establishing a new transparency regime for non-equities and further strengthen and broaden the existing equity trade transparency regime. Provision of real-time market data With MiFIR data publication by trading venues (and systematic internalisers) falls under the new uniform transparency requirements. Under the new regime pre- and post-trade data shall be made available in a disaggregated form and unbundled from further services (MiFIR, Article 12, and RTS, Article 10 (1)). Further requirements are set out in MiFIR, Article 13 and RTS, Article 8 (obligation to provide market data on a non-discriminatory basis), and a new obligation in relation to per user fees (RTS, Article 9). Adherence to these requirements for the different trading venues within Deutsche Börse is reflected within the Market Data Price List of Deutsche Börse AG ( Deutsche Börse ), which is publicly available on the website. Data fees at reasonable commercial terms Amongst others, trading venues are also obliged to make the relevant pre- and post-trade data available on a reasonable commercial basis (MiFIR, Article 13). 1 REGULATION (EU) No 600/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012; see also section 1.2 of this paper for further regulatory details 2 COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2017/567 of 18 May 2016 supplementing Regulation 600/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council with regard to definitions, transparency, portfolio compression and supervisory measures on product intervention and positions

Transparency obligation for market data under MiFIR Deutsche Börse AG 3 In line with RTS, Article 11 (2) (e), this document is providing information on how the price of market data is being set. 1.2. Legal Basis for the Provision of Real-time Data on a Reasonable Commercial Basis The core requirements to provide pre- and post-trade data on a reasonable commercial basis are outlined within MiFIR Article 13 Obligation to make pre-trade and post-trade data available on a reasonable commercial basis 1. Market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue shall make the information published in accordance with Articles 3, 4 and 6 to 11 available to the public on a reasonable commercial basis and ensure non-discriminatory access to the information. Such information shall be made available free of charge 15 minutes after publication. 2. The Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 50 clarifying what constitutes a reasonable commercial basis to make information public as referred to in paragraph 1. Further details have accordingly been provided in the RTS, in particular, Article 6, Obligation to provide market data on a reasonable commercial basis (Article 13(1), 15(1) and 18(8) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014) 1. For the purposes of making market data containing the information set out in Articles 3, 4, 6 to 11, 15 and 18 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 available to the public on a reasonable commercial basis, market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue and systematic internalisers shall, in accordance with Article 13(1), Article 15(1) and 18(8) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014, comply with the obligations set out in Articles 7 to 11 of this Regulation. 2. Articles 7, 8(2), 9, 10(2) and 11 shall not apply to market operators or investment firms operating trading venues or to systematic internalisers that make market data available to the public free of charge. in combination with Article 7, Obligation to provide market data on the basis of cost (Article 13(1), 15(1) and 18(8) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014) 1. The price of market data shall be based on the cost of producing and disseminating such data and may include a reasonable margin. 2. The cost of producing and disseminating market data may include an appropriate share of joint costs for other services provided by market

Transparency obligation for market data under MiFIR Deutsche Börse AG 4 operators or investment firms operating a trading venue or by systematic internalisers. The RTS also provides for certain transparency obligations and in particular publication requirements: Article 11 Transparency obligation (Article 13(1), 15(1) and 18(8) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014) 1. Market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue and systematic internalisers shall disclose the price and other terms and conditions for the provision of the market data in a manner which is easily accessible to the public. 2. The disclosure shall include the following: (a) (e) information on how the price was set, including the cost accounting methodologies used and the specific principles according to which direct and variable joint costs are allocated and fixed joint costs are apportioned, between the production and dissemination of market data and other services provided by market operators and investment firms operating a trading venue or systematic internalisers. 2. Relevant Market Data Products and Scope of Description The core business of the Market Data + Services ( MD+S ) segment is the distribution of capital market information, technology and infrastructure services to clients worldwide. These services include real-time trading and market signals, as well as indices such as the EURO STOXX 50 and the DAX. Capital market participants subscribe to this information, or license it for their own use, processing, or dissemination. Data Services is one of the business areas of MD+S, which is providing real-time transparency and dissemination services for Deutsche Börse Group s own trading venues as well as third party trading venues (i.e., partner exchanges) or other data providers. As such, the Data Services business area mainly involves the distribution of licenses for real-time trading and market signals, and the provision of historical data to banks, trading firms, and fund management companies. The most important products in this respect are order book data from the cash and derivatives markets, as well as reference data of exchanges within Deutsche Börse Group and its partner exchanges. MiFIR applies to certain data products published by Deutsche Börse. Below, all MiFIR relevant products affected by the new transparency regime under MiFIR, provided by Deutsche Börse and for which Deutsche Börse have been tasked by Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse and Eurex Deutschland are being listed:

Transparency obligation for market data under MiFIR Deutsche Börse AG 5 Originating trading venue Frankfurter Wertpapierbörse Eurex Deutschland Data products Xetra Pre-Trade Xetra Post-Trade Börse Frankfurt Pre-Trade Börse Frankfurt Post-Trade Eurex Pre-Trade Eurex Post-Trade Comprehensive information on real-time market data products and the respective licensing agreements including a fully transparent overview on pricing is available on Deutsche Börse s websites (http://www.mds.deutsche-boerse.com/mds-en/data-services/real-time-market-data and http://www.mds.deutsche-boerse.com/mds-en/data-services/real-time-marketdata/agreements, respectively). 3. General Cost Accounting Principles and applied Cost Allocation Methodology MD+S provides and disseminates the real-time market data on behalf of the trading venues subject to the requirements for MiFIR. In total, Deutsche Börse acts as both a manufacturer and a distributor of market data. The costs for each service consist of standard directly attributable costs and indirect costs. Prices for the relevant data packages are generally being defined based on costs as laid out below, and the value of the data to various customer groups, including the content of the data packages. Furthermore, pricing of similar services by other data providers are considered for validation. 3.1 General Accounting Principles at Deutsche Börse Deutsche Börse s financial statements are prepared in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the related interpretations issued by the International Financial Reporting Standards Interpretation Committee (IFRSIC), as adopted by the European Union in accordance with Regulation 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of international accounting standards. 3.2 Cost Accounting Methodology and Specific Principles Prices charged for the real-time market data provided by trading venues belonging to Deutsche Börse Group are derived based on fair and reasonable terms to recover costs incurred for the whole process of creating and distributing market data, including the control of licensed third parties, plus a reasonable margin. In order to set fees for the provision of market data at a reasonable level Deutsche Börse considers in line with the requirements of MiFIR different contributions to the overall costs: a) Directly attributable costs for the dissemination of real-time data (but also for production, insofar as relevant), for example staff costs, marketing costs, costs for the

Transparency obligation for market data under MiFIR Deutsche Börse AG 6 real-time market data feed (CEF ) of Deutsche Börse (as technical infrastructure for dissemination of real-time market data), but also a relevant share of indirect costs from tax, accounting, legal and similar functions. These costs are incurred within the data business; b) Shares of joint costs for the production (but also for the dissemination, insofar as relevant), for example primary costs incurred by operators of the respective trading venues, amongst others their respective staff costs, costs for market supervision, IT costs for the trading platforms as well as the relevant share of costs from tax, accounting, legal and similar functions. These costs are primarily incurred in Xetra and Eurex as well as within Deutsche Börse directly (where applicable); and c) A reasonable margin both at the production and dissemination levels. Deutsche Börse concluded that an Activity Based Cost accounting solution is the most appropriate method for determining the cost allocation for the provision of market data and associated services in the context of assessing the reasonable commercial basis. 3.3 Cost Allocation for Real-time Market Data The determination of the relevant cost basis for the identification and assessment of the reasonable commercial basis of the fees set are the direct fixed and variable costs of the data business. As outlined above, those direct costs will be supplemented with attributable indirect costs and shared joint fixed and variable costs. Those allocations are implemented based on the following specific principles as follows: MD+S IT functions contribute to the cost base only when performing functions or services relevant to the production and dissemination of real-time market data, i.e. excluding those costs associated with clearing, asset servicing and settlement. MD+S business functions contribute to the cost base reflecting the increased awareness and efforts for regulatory controlled business. Costs incurred by the trading venues are adjusted for all clearing related activities. As a consequence, only the remaining trading related costs are taken into consideration only. Typical allocation keys are applied for the allocation of indirect costs both from corporate services as well as from other business areas are amongst others revenues, head count, and work space. In particular, for IT related costs a further set of refined allocation keys is applied.