Real World Applications of Stochastic Models

Similar documents
The New Risk-Based Capital

Principle Based Reserves Ohio Chapter IASA. November 21, 2016 Columbus, OH

Earnings at Risk: Real-world Risk Management

Stochastic Modeling Concerns and RBC C3 Phase 2 Issues

US Life Insurer Stress Testing

April The members of the work group that are responsible for this practice note are as follows:

Advanced Seminar on Principle Based Capital September 23, 2009 Session 1: C3P3 Overview

Asset Adequacy Analysis Whys and Hows William M. Sayre December 5, 2003

Making Risk Models Relevant

June 30, Technical Director Financial Accounting Standards Board 401 Merritt 7 PO Box 5116 Norwalk, CT Dear Ms.

AFTERNOON SESSION. Date: Thursday, April 27, 2017 Time: 1:30 p.m. 3:45 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Sara Richman, Vice President, Products, Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company

NAIC s Center for Insurance Policy and Research Summit: Exploring Insurers Liabilities

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Strategic Risk Analysis for the purposes of Analyzing Surplus Requirements for Sample Company by. SIGMA Actuarial Consulting Group, Inc.

RBC C3 Phase II Seminar ACSW Spring Meeting 6/10/2005

Session 30, Latest GAAP Developments/Hot Topics in GAAP Reporting. Moderator: Thomas Q Chamberlain, ASA, MAAA. Presenter:

ILA LFVU Model Solutions Spring 2018

Article from The Financial Reporter. September 2018 Issue 114

PBA DON T YOU JUST LOVE IT!

PBR in the Audit: What to Expect Michael Fruchter, FSA, MAAA Emily Cassidy, ASA, MAAA

2016 Variable Annuity Guaranteed Benefits Survey Survey of Assumptions for Policyholder Behavior in the Tail

Financial Modeling of Variable Annuities

Least Squares Monte Carlo (LSMC) life and annuity application Prepared for Institute of Actuaries of Japan

U.S. GAAP & IFRS: Today and Tomorrow Sept , New York. Overview of Basic GAAP

LONGEVITY RISK TASK FORCE UPDATE

Stochastic Analysis Of Long Term Multiple-Decrement Contracts

Presented to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Life and Health Actuarial Task Force. San Antonio, TX December 2006

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institut Canadien des Actuaires MEMORANDUM

Article from: Product Matters! February 2012 Issue 82

The Financial Reporter

Investment Symposium March F7: Investment Implications of a Principal-Based Approach to Capital. Moderator Ross Bowen

ILA LFVU Model Solutions Fall 2017

Stock Market Crash of 2002 How the Drop in the Equity Market Affects Insurers

Analysis of Proposed Principle-Based Approach

Stochastic Pricing. Southeastern Actuaries Conference. Cheryl Angstadt. November 15, Towers Perrin

Dave Sandberg Vice President for Life, American Academy of Actuaries

DEVELOPING A GROUP CAPITAL CALCULATION

US GAAP Update What s New

Advanced Seminar on Principle Based Capital September 23, 2009 Session 2: Case Study

AFTERNOON SESSION. Date: Thursday, April 26, 2018 Time: 1:30 p.m. 3:45 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

October 16, The Honorable Nick Gerhart Chair, Variable Annuities Issues (E) Working Group National Association of Insurance Commissioners

Katie Campbell, FSA, MAAA

PBR Regulatory Update and Implementation Challenges

Asset Liability Modelling (ALM) Approaches, Techniques, Trends In the Pension Practice

Article from Financial Reporter. December 2017 Issue 110

2006 Tillinghast Pricing Methodology Survey Results

INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

MORNING SESSION. Date: Thursday, November 1, 2018 Time: 8:30 a.m. 11:45 a.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

LONGEVITY RISK TASK FORCE UPDATE (LRTF)

November Course 8ILA Society of Actuaries ** BEGINNING OF EXAMINATION ** MORNING SESSION

FASB Targeted Improvements

Session 88 PD, PBR: Practical Implementation and Governance Issues. Moderator: Helen Colterman, FSA, CERA, ACIA

Enterprise Risk Management and Stochastic Embedded Value Modeling

Re: VAIWG Exposure of Proposed Changes to Actuarial Guideline 43 and C-3 Phase II

Article from The Financial Reporter. June 2017 Issue 109

Chapter 4 Probability Distributions

Life Reserve Work Group Initial Modeling Results 20-year Term Product

Allianz. European Embedded Value Report

In physics and engineering education, Fermi problems

GENERAL DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Individual Life & Annuities United States Company/Sponsor Perspective Exam CSP-IU MORNING SESSION

ALM processes and techniques in insurance

Actuary s Guide to Reporting on Insurers of Persons Policy Liabilities. Senior Direction, Supervision of Insurers and Control of Right to Practise

Life and Health Actuarial Task Force

2016 American Academy of Actuaries. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced without express permission. STOCHASTIC, DETERMINISTIC AND NPR RESERVES

Overview. Definitions. Definitions. Graphs. Chapter 4 Probability Distributions. probability distributions

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Individual Life & Annuities United States Design & Pricing Exam DP-IU AFTERNOON SESSION

IFRS 17 beyond implementation, towards commercial implications

An Impact Analysis of Proposed Targeted Improvements

POLICYHOLDER BEHAVIOR IN THE TAIL UL WITH SECONDARY GUARANTEE SURVEY 2012 RESULTS Survey Highlights

Framework for a New Standard Approach to Setting Capital Requirements. Joint Committee of OSFI, AMF, and Assuris

RECORD Volume 30, No. 3 * Annual Meeting and Exhibit New York, NY October 24-27, 2004

Strategic Asset Allocation A Comprehensive Approach. Investment risk/reward analysis within a comprehensive framework

Session 102 PD - Impact of VM-20 on Life Insurance Pricing. Moderator: Trevor D. Huseman, FSA, MAAA

Consistency Work Group September Robert DiRico, A.S.A., M.A.A.A., Chair of the Consistency Work Group

U.S. GAAP & IFRS: Today and Tomorrow Sept , New York. Reinsurance Under GAAP

Beware of What You Price For: Credit Implications of UL Secondary Guarantees for U.S. Life Insurers

Enterprise Risk Management

Making Sense of Cents

Tests for One Variance

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Individual Life & Annuities United States Design & Pricing Exam DP-IU AFTERNOON SESSION

Canadian Institute of Actuaries Institut Canadien des Actuaires MEMORANDUM

Session 48PD: PBR - Real Life Applications. Moderator: Alberto A Abalo FSA,MAAA,CERA

Investment Symposium March F1: What Are We Hedging Anyway? GAAP, Stat, or Economics? Moderator Jay Musselman

August 15, Al Schmitz, MAAA, FSA, Chairperson LTC PBR Work Group

Assumption Setting Under Multiple Frameworks

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Update Life

Session 57, Profits Followed by Losses Methods and Policies. Moderator: Thomas Q. Chamberlain, ASA, MAAA. Presenter: Charles K. Chacosky, FSA, MAAA

Article from: Risk Management. March 2014 Issue 29

Understanding the Death Benefit Switch Option in Universal Life Policies

Economic Capital: Recent Market Trends and Best Practices for Implementation

AFTERNOON SESSION. Date: Thursday, April 26, 2018 Time: 1:30 p.m. 3:45 p.m. INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES

Explaining Your Financial Results Attribution Analysis and Forecasting Using Replicated Stratified Sampling

Modeling by the Ceding Company and/or Reinsurer

NAIC VA Reserve and Capital Reform: Overview of Proposed Revisions. Aaron Sarfatti

Actuaries Club of the Southwest

Session 3B, Stochastic Investment Planning. Presenters: Paul Manson, CFA. SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

CSP-IU Model Solutions Spring 2012

11/17/2009. Introduction. Outline. Principles-Based Reserving Education Session 7:30-9:00 Maryland Ballroom D. NAIC 2009 Fall National Meeting

Transcription:

Real World Applications of Stochastic Models June 24, 2005 Nathan Hardiman Rebecca Scotchie Seems like every actuarial publication has articles on requirements involving stochastic models This project takes another step down an evolutionary path that includes cash flow testing, regulation XXX and other reserve requirements that require multiple scenario testing and company specific data to support formula reserves.

the utilization of the GLBs is much tougher to predict since it is driven by policyholder behavior. Experience on the utilization of these riders is still limited and should be analyzed under a variety of market scenarios.

Life companies that formerly used a socalled factor approach to establish reserves will now have to become experts in stochastic modeling. Discussion Topics Why use stochastic models? Stochastic modeling mini-tutorial Value-added applications of stochastic modeling Why use Stochastic Models? Valuable means of measuring and analyzing risks of our business Most beneficial for risks with low frequency and high severity Maximize profitability for a given level of risk Aid in making business decisions

Why use Stochastic Models? Regulatory requirements driving the use of Stochastic Models: Move toward principles-based regulation Proposal for C-3 Phase II RBC Proposed AG VACARVM Regulation suggests use of stochastic modeling GAAP SOP 03-1 Coming Soon If stochastic modeling is not currently being done, it will likely be required at some point (probably sooner rather than later). Building these models is: Costly Time consuming Huge initial effort Coming Soon Actuaries need to help upper management avoid the perspective of modeling as an expensive regulatory exercise. Show value of modeling in better understanding, pricing, and management of the business.

We have all been modeling for most of our career In-force & NB Files Existing Assets Liability Projection Assumptions & Specifications Calculation Engine Output and Reporting Corporate Data Crediting Data Asset & Investment Data Scenario(s) What makes a model stochastic? Projecting model repeatedly varying one or more items, e.g.: Interest rates Equity returns Mortality rates Default rates Involves random generation and sampling from a stochastic distribution May have secondary effect on another value Policyholder behavior Calculation Engine Output and Reporting Scenario(s) What output is valuable from a stochastic model? Range of results Results at various percentiles CTE measures Graph of risk profile (PVDE) Individual scenario output Average results (expected IRR) Calculation Engine Output and Reporting Scenario(s)

Value Added Applications Develop risk/reward profile of new or existing products Assess effect of assumptions in extreme scenarios Only as good as assumed relationship E.g., assumed formula to model policyholder behavior Two formulas thought to be equally credible could give different results. Which is correct? Take care to not create a false sense of security ILLUSTRATIVE Risk Profile of Potential Product Designs 30 25 Percent of Scenarios 20 15 10 5 0 <=-10% 1.0% 3.0% 5.0% 7.0% 9.0% 11.0% 13.0% 15.0% 17.0% 19.0% >20% IRR Value Added Applications Calculate expected returns on new sales and existing blocks of business Test management strategies Investment Strategy Crediting Strategy

ILLUSTRATIVE Potential Investment Strategies 16.0% 14.0% Expected IRR 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% Standard Deviation Value Added Applications Assist in corporate planning/strategy Analysis for rating agencies Analysis for company analysts More Complex Value Added Applications C-3 Phase II capital and AG VACARVM reserves UL working group is exploring similar calculation Stochastic Mortality Nested stochastic applications Projection of principles-based capital and reserves or GAAP SOP 03-1 reserves Pricing or in-force projection GAAP SOP 03-1 Benefit reserves

C-3 Phase II capital and AG VACARVM reserves The proposed requirements introduce a scenario-modeling approach to assessing regulatory capital and reserves C-3 Phase II capital equals CTE90 of the Total Asset Requirement (TAR) using prescribed C-3 scenarios, which meet certain calibration points, less statutory reserves actually held. VACARVM reserves equal CTE65 of the TAR using the prescribed C-3 scenarios. For reserves, the TAR is before tax. C-3 Phase II capital and AG VACARVM reserves Scenario 1 Initial Arrays Reorder Arrays CTE Scenario 2 Scenario 1000 Stochastic mortality Application of stochastic function to input mortality rate to make stochastic Normal distribution Example: Table rate d = 0.0027 for 45MNS Apply y~n(µ, σ) where µ = 1 and σ = 0.1 Therefore, mortality rate for each scenario equals d * y

Nested Stochastic Applications Nested stochastic modeling is needed to determine capital and reserves for a pricing run which includes a projection of capital and reserves in the future. Model Point 1, Scenario 1 30 yr projection Model Point 2, Scenario 1 Experience Calculations Model Point 10, Scenario 1,000 Nested Calculations Nested Stochastic Applications Initial Arrays Reorder Arrays CTE Model Point 1, Scenario 1 Experience Calculation C-3 RBC Calculations GAAP SOP 03-1 benefit reserves Calculation of SOP 03-1 benefit reserves can be a stochastic modeling exercise at time 0. In a GAAP projection, there are several approaches available for calculating and reflecting SOP 03-1 benefit reserves Approaches Description Use external projection system Develop benefit ratios from external system and feed into projection, for generating benefit ratios Calculate future benefit pmts. by applying factors to EGPs, or assessments and average benefit payment (+) Simple to implement factors (+) Leverage off of existing model (-) External system needs to be consistent with DAC valuation system (-) Does not accommodate stochastic modeling demands (discussed later) Build capabilities within system Explicitly perform a side calculation at issue stochastically generating to perform stochastic projection benefit ratio and average future benefit payments at issue to develop benefit ratio (-) More difficult to implement and future average benefit (-) Increased run time payments (+) Promotes consistency, making system 'all-in-one' solution (+) Sets the stage well for stochastic modeling demands

GAAP SOP 03-1 benefit ratio unlocking In a stochastic environment, the SOP benefit reserves would need to be unlocked to reflect actual collected assessment and benefit payments differing from expectations. This can be attacked in several ways: Approaches Description Use valuation date benefit ratio Use approach developed for valuation system, leave constant throughout throughout projection (+) Simple to implement (created by val system) (+) Run time low (-) Accuracy questionable Develop 'rules-of-thumb' for Perform analysis to determine a rule-of-thumb on unlocking benefit unlocking benefit ratios ratios, perhaps based on NAR, equity return change, other measures (+) Simple to implement (+) Run time relatively low (-) Difficult to develop appropriate 'rules-of-thumb' (-) Accuracy questionable Perform stochastic-on-stochastic Use system to perform a side stochastic projection at each projection unlocking period to explicitly re-evaluate and unlock benefit ratio (-) More difficult to implement (-) Run time an issue (+) Most accurate, true-to-life approach Questions?