Community Foundation of St. Clair County Conflict of Interest Policy

Similar documents
Policy and Procedure. McMinnville Free Clinic

Article I - Purpose. Article II - Definitions

THE D.C. CENTRAL KITCHEN, INC. CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Conflict of Interest Policy. Institute for Middle East Understanding (the Organization ) Article One Purpose

Washington Youth Soccer. Conflict of Interest Policy. Article I Purpose

, INC. Conflict of Interest Policy

Forever Young Foundation (FYF) Conflict of Interest Policy And Annual Statement

Conflict of Interest Policy

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY MEN S HEALTH ARKIVE, INC. ARTICLE I PURPOSE ARTICLE II DEFINITIONS

Conflict of interest. Addendum to Bylaws of the Pro-Life Action League

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Maple Valley-Anthon Oto Foundation Conflict of Interest Policy. Article I Purpose

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES LACTATION CONSULTANT ASSOCIATION, INC.

Durango Arts Center Conflict of Interest Policy and Annual Statement

Delaware State University

Conflict of Interest Policy

The GOD S CHILD Project Conflict of Interest Policy For Directors and Officers and Members of a Committee with Board-Delegated Powers

For Directors and Officers and Members of a Committee with Board Delegated Powers

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY OF THE NEW YORK STATE WEST YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION, INC. (ADOPTED ON THE 17th DAY OF February, 2016)

CUSTER AREA ARTS COUNCIL. CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY 1 and ANNUAL STATEMENT

Conflict of Interest Policy

The Louisiana Chapter American Institute of Architects Conflict of Interest Policy (Adopted )

Conflict of Interest Policy

Pine-Richland Unified Booster Organization Conflict of Interest

CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST POLICIES: DISCLOSURE, MONITORING, AND ENFORCEMENT

Conflict of Interest Policy for Officers and Trustees

NOTE REGARDING THE SAMPLE DOCUMENTS: This sample document is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or counsel.

Nonprofit Governance and Management, Third Edition

Conflict of Interest Policy. And. Annual Statement

Conflict of Interest Policy

Conflict of Interest Policy of the Blair Historic Preservation Alliance

MOUNT SINAI JEWISH CENTER CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

FORENSIC SPECIALTIES ACCREDITATION BOARD

Conflict of Interest Policy: Utah Council for Citizen Diplomacy (UCCD)

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Conflict of Interest Policy for Trustees, Officers and Key Employees

Conflict of Interest Policy The Cooperative Foundation

Conflict of Interest Policy and Procedures of the Columbus Family YMCA

YMCA OF DELAWARE CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY AND PROCEDURES

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Mountain Song Community School Conflict of Interest Policy

Constitution Review Committee 07/06/2011

Conflict of Interest Statement For American Baptist Homes of the West And its Affiliated Entities

SAMPLE POLICY [NAME OF ORGANIZATION] CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND DOCUMENTATION POLICY. Scope. Purpose. Policy

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Conflict of Interest Policy

WASHINGTON STATE RECYCLING ASSOCIATION CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE

YALE CHINA ASSOCIATION, INC. Conflict of Interest Policy

YMCA OF GREATER TRI-VALLEY CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND POLICY

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY F O R GRA YHA WK EL E ME NT A RY S CHO OL PTO

SAMPLE Board Member Conflict of Interests Disclosure Form

MISSOURI EVERGREEN A MISSOURI NONPROFIT CORPORATION RESOLUTION ADOPTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

WSA Conflict of Interest Policy

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY updated 10/15/2015

RAMAPO CATSKILL LIBRARY SYSTEM BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING MARCH 16, 2015 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR S SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

Conflict of Interest Policy Revised Effective: July 23, 2011 Page 1 of 5

I. Purpose. Policy Definitions

THE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Riverwood Healthcare Center Policy and Procedure

BOARD OF TRUSTEES BUFFALO & ERIE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY MEETING DATE: June 12, 2014

BUTLER HEALTH SYSTEM CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Conflict of Interest Policy Packet

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY. Article I: Purpose. Article II: Definitions

Section 1: Name: The name of the organization is Long Beach ALIVE (ALIVE is an acronym for Alternatives to Living In a Violent Environment).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Wounded Warrior Project, Inc. Conflict of Interest and Related Party Transaction Policy

disability Law Center of Virginia

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY OF BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE ASSOCIATION, INC.

UMass Amherst Alumni Association

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

XYZ Health System Policy

American Platform Tennis Association, Inc. Conflict of Interest Policy

SAMPLE Org. Conflict of Interest Policy & Annual Form

PHA Policy on Conflict of Interest

SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL

GLOSSARY. 3) The two persons are each a director, trustee, officer, or greater than 10% owner in the same business or investment entity.

Last Revised Next Review

ST. CLAIR COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES Minutes of Regular Meeting Held August 13, 2015

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY OF THE CORDAID FOUNDATION

NEW YORK EHEALTH COLLABORATIVE, Inc. POLICY ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND DISCLOSURE

CHAPTER XI FINANCE. Approvals required for making investment decisions, other than those stated in the investment policy statements, are as follows:

CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

Conflicts of Interests and Charter Schools By Eric V. Hall

Conflict of Interest Policy

[NAME OF CHARTER SCHOOL] CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY ARTICLE I PURPOSE

ANAHEIM RESORT TRANSPORTATION CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

EAST OF HUDSON WATERSHED CORPORATION CODE OF ETHICS January 9, 2018

The Lawrence Foundation. Conflict of Interest Policy

SAMPLE ANNUAL FORM 990 QUESTIONNAIRE (RELATIONSHIPS/TRANSACTIONS/INDEPENDENCE)

Resolution to adopt Conflicts of Interest Policy for the GCOOS-RA Corporation

GOODWILL OF GREATER WASHINGTON CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY JUNE 9, 2014 ARTICLE I PURPOSE

DeWitt Community Library Association (DCLA) Conflicts of Interest Policy

Unitarian Universalist Church of Annapolis Conflict of Interest Policy

The Leapfrog Group Conflict of Interest Policy

Sample Conflict of Interest Policy for Senior Staff of CAA without Head Start September 2017

UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NAPA VALLEY COLLEGE VITICULTURE AND WINERY TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION

CODE OF ETHICS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

( CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF NSHMBA FOUNDATION v.5

Transcription:

Community Foundation of St. Clair County Conflict of Interest Policy ARTICLE I: Purpose The purpose of the conflict of interest policy is to protect the Community Foundation of St. Clair County s interest when it is contemplating entering into a transaction or arrangement that might benefit the private interest of an officer or trustee of the Organization or might result in a possible excess benefit transaction. This policy is intended to supplement but not replace any applicable state and federal laws governing conflict of interest applicable to nonprofit and charitable organizations. Additionally, this policy s Appendix B is intended to address and prevent conflicts of interest that may arise with regard to our Board Chair and other organizations. ARTICLE II: Definitions 1. Interested Person Any trustee, principal officer, or member of a committee with Board-delegated powers or staff person, who has a direct or indirect financial interest, as defined below, is an interested person. 2. Financial Interest A person has a financial interest if the person has, directly or indirectly, through business, investment or family: a. An ownership or investment interest in any entity with which the Community Foundation has a transaction or arrangement, b. A compensation arrangement with the Community Foundation or with any entity or individual with which the Community Foundation has a transaction or arrangement, or c. A potential ownership or investment interest in, or compensation arrangement with, any entity or individual with which the Community Foundation is negotiating a transaction or arrangement. Compensation includes direct and indirect remuneration as well as gifts or favors that are not insubstantial. A financial interest is not necessarily a conflict of interest. Under Article III, Section 2, a person who has a financial interest may have a conflict of interest only if the appropriate governing board or committee decides that a conflict of interest exists. 3. Independent Voting Member A member of the governing board or a member of a committee with Board-delegated powers is considered independent only if all three of the following circumstances applied at all times through the year: a. The member was not compensated as an officer or employee of the Community Foundation or of a related organization; 1

b. The member did not receive total compensation or other payments exceeding $10,000 during the calendar (tax) year of the Community Foundation or related organizations as an independent contractor, other than reimbursement of expenses under an accountable plan or reasonable compensation for services as a member of the governing body; c. Neither the member, nor any family member of the member, was involved in a transaction with the Community Foundation that is required to be reported on IRS Form 990 Schedule L for the Community Foundation s tax year, or in a transaction with a related organization of a type and amount that would be reportable on IRS Form 990 Schedule L if required to be filed by the related organization. Note: A member of the governing body or a committee with Board-delegated powers is not considered to lack independence merely because of the following circumstances: a. the member is a donor to the Community Foundation or a related organization, regardless of the amount of contribution; or b. the member receives financial benefits from the organization solely in the capacity of being a member of the charitable or other class served by the Community Foundation in the exercise of its exempt function, such as being a member of a section 501 (c) (6) organization, so long as the financial benefits comply with the organization s terms of membership. 4. Business Relationship Business relationships between two persons include any of the following: a. One person is employed by the other in a sole-proprietorship or by an organization with which the other is associated as a trustee, director, officer, key employee, or greater-than-35% owner; b. One person is transacting business with the other (other than in the ordinary course of either party s business on the same terms as are generally offered to the public), directly or indirectly, in one or more contracts of sale, lease, license, loan, performance of services, or other transaction involving transfers of cash or property valued in excess of $10,000 in the aggregate during the Community Foundation s calendar (tax) year (indirect transactions are transactions with an organization with which the one person is associated as a trustee, director, officer, key employee, or greater-than-35% owner); and c. The two persons are each a director, trustee, officer or greater than 10% owner in the same business or investments entity; Ownership is measured by stock ownership (either voting power or value) of a corporation, profits or capital interest in a partnership or limited liability company, membership interest in a non-profit organization, or beneficial interest in a trust. Ownership includes indirect ownership and there may be ownership through multiple tiers of entities. Privileged relationship exception: A business relationship does not include a relationship between 1) attorney and client; 2) medical professional and patient; or 3) priest/clergy and communicant. 2

5. Related Organization An organization that stands in one or more of the following relationships to the filing organization (the Community Foundation for these purposes): Parent an organization that controls the filing organization; Subsidiary an organization controlled by the filing organization; Brother-Sister an organization controlled by the same person or persons that control the filing organization; Supporting/Supported an organization that is (or claims to be) at any time during the organization s tax year a supporting organization of the Community Foundation within the meaning of section 509(a)(3), or for these purposes, the Community Renaissance Fund, the Blue Water Land Fund, Inc. or The James C. Acheson Charitable Foundation. ARTICLE III: Procedures 1. Duty to Disclose In connection with any actual or possible conflict of interest, an interested person must disclose the existence of the financial interest and be given the opportunity to disclose all material facts to the directors and members of committees with governing Boarddelegated powers considering the proposed transaction or arrangement. 2. Determining Whether a Conflict of Interest Exists After disclosure of the financial interest and all material facts, and after any discussion with the interested person, he/she shall leave the governing board or committee meeting while the determination of a conflict of interest is discussed and voted upon. The remaining board or committee members shall decide if a conflict of interest exists. 3. Procedures for Addressing the Conflict of Interest a. An interested person may make a presentation at the governing board or committee meeting, but after the presentation, he/she shall leave the meeting during the discussion of, and the vote on, the transaction or arrangement involving the possible conflict of interest. b. The chairperson of the governing board or committee shall, if appropriate, appoint a disinterested person or committee to investigate alternatives to the proposed transaction or arrangement. c. After exercising due diligence, the governing board or committee shall determine whether the Community Foundation can obtain with reasonable efforts a more advantageous transaction or arrangement from a person or entity that would not give rise to a conflict of interest. d. If a more advantageous transaction or arrangement is not reasonably possible under circumstances not producing a conflict of interest, the governing board or committee shall determine by a majority vote of the disinterested directors whether the transaction or arrangement is in the Community Foundation s best interest, for its own benefit, and whether it is fair and reasonable. In conformity 3

with the above determination it shall make its decision as to whether to enter into the transaction or arrangement. 4. Violations of the Conflicts of Interest Policy a. If the governing board or committee has reasonable cause to believe that a member has failed to disclose actual or possible conflicts of interest, it shall inform the member of the basis for such belief and afford the member an opportunity to explain the alleged failure to disclose. b. If, after hearing the member s response and after making further investigation as warranted by the circumstances, the governing board or committee determines the member has failed to disclose an actual or possible conflict of interest, it shall take appropriate disciplinary and corrective action. ARTICLE IV: Records of Proceedings The minutes of the governing board and all committees with Board-delegated powers shall contain: a. The names of the persons who disclosed or otherwise were found to have a financial interest in connection with an actual or possible conflict of interest, the nature of the financial interest, any action taken to determine whether a conflict of interest was present, and the governing board s or committee s decision as to whether a conflict of interest in fact existed. b. The names of the persons who were present for discussions and votes relating to the transaction or arrangement, the content of the discussion, including any alternatives to the proposed transaction or arrangement, and a record of any votes taken in connection with the proceedings. ARTICLE V: Compensation a. A voting member of the governing board who receives compensation, directly or indirectly, from the Community Foundation for services is precluded from voting on matters pertaining to that member s compensation. b. A voting member of any committee whose jurisdiction includes compensation matters and who receives compensation, directly or indirectly, from the Community Foundation for services is precluded from voting on matters pertaining to that member s compensation. c. No voting member of the governing board or any committee whose jurisdiction includes compensation matters and who receives compensation, directly or indirectly, from the Community Foundation, either individually or collectively, is prohibited from providing information to any committee regarding compensation. ARTICLE VI: Annual Statements Each trustee, principal officer, member of a committee with governing Board-delegated Powers, and staff member shall annually sign a statement which affirms such person: a. Has received a copy of the conflict of interest policy, b. Has read and understands the policy, c. Has agreed to comply with the policy, and 4

d. Understands the Community Foundation is charitable and in order to maintain its federal tax exemption it must engage primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of its tax-exempt purposes. ARTICLE VII: Periodic Reviews To ensure the Community Foundation operates in a manner consistent with charitable purposes and does not engage in activities that could jeopardize its tax-exempt status, periodic reviews shall be conducted. The periodic reviews shall, at a minimum, include the following subjects: a. Whether compensation arrangements and benefits are reasonable, based on competent survey information, and the result of arm s length bargaining. b. Whether partnerships, joint ventures, and arrangements with management organizations conform to the Community Foundation s written policies, are properly recorded, reflect reasonable investment or payments for goods and services, further charitable purposes and do not result in inurement, impermissible private benefit or in an excess benefit transaction. ARTICLE VIII: Use of Outside Experts When conducting the periodic reviews as provided for in Article VII, the Community Foundation may, but need not, use outside advisors. If outside experts are used, their use shall not relieve the governing board of its responsibility for ensuring periodic reviews are conducted. 5

Appendix A Summary of Excess Benefit Transaction Regulations ( Intermediate Sanctions ): Section 4958 of the Internal Revenue Code The Internal Revenue Code and Treasury Regulations prohibit public charities from providing excessive (more than fair market value) economic benefits to disqualified persons. The Regulations set forth procedures, or rebuttable presumption rules, that, if followed, provide a presumption of reasonableness for transactions between a public charity and a disqualified person. Disqualified persons with respect to a public charity include: individuals who are in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the Community Foundation, including officers, directors, trustees, or individuals with similar responsibilities, a founder of the Community Foundation, substantial contributors (defined as any person who has contributed in the current fiscal year and the four preceding fiscal years more than $5,000, if such amount is more than 2% of total contributions received during that five-year period by the Community Foundation, and other individuals based on a facts and circumstances test; any of the persons listed above who has been in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the organization during the past 5 years; family members of any person described above (spouse, siblings, spouses of siblings, ancestors, lineal descendants and spouses of lineal descendants); corporations, partnerships, and trusts or estates in which a person described above owns more than 35% of the voting power, profits interest, or beneficial interest. All transactions that provide an economic benefit disqualified persons such as compensation for services and purchases and sales of property are subject to the intermediate sanctions rules, whether the transactions are done directly by the organization or indirectly through a controlled entity (taxable or tax-exempt) or an intermediary. Under the Regulations implementing the intermediate sanctions rules, three conditions must be satisfied to take advantage of the rebuttable presumption. These include: approval by disinterested governing board (or committee) before the transaction is entered into; reliance on comparable data to determine that the economic benefit provided to a disqualified person does not exceed fair market value for the services or property provided by the disqualified person in return; and concurrent documentation that adequately documents the basis for making the determination that the transaction is reasonable (the Regulations specifically provide what information must be documented). 6

Appendix B Conflict of Interest Policy for the Board Chair Purpose The Chair of the Board for the Community Foundation of St. Clair County will be held to a higher standard Conflict of Interest than is described within the Foundation s current Conflict of Interest Policy, which applies to Trustees, staff and committee members. Trustees of the Foundation shall not be eligible to serve as Board Chair under the following circumstances; a) Is an Interested Person as defined in Article II Section 1 and the financial transactions between the Foundation and the Interested Person are substantial. b) Has a significant business relationship as defined in Article II Section 4. Examples of these conflicts would include but are not limited to; a. Investment firms holding, managing or providing consultation services on more than $1 million of Foundation assets b. A senior paid staff level person at another organization which currently is or recently has received significant funding from the Foundation, or which may in the foreseeable future receive significant funding from the Foundation. c. Senior staff at another for profit or nonprofit business which through partnerships, collaboration or shared interested could be perceived to influence the allocation of significant Foundation resources, which in turn could provide benefit to their respective business or organization. Candidates for Board Chair must avoid any actual or perceived conflict of interest including that which might impair or impugn the independence, integrity or impartiality of the board. There must be no apprehension of bias, based on what a reasonable person might perceive. Generally, we will expect that the Board Chair will not simultaneously serve as the chair of another local organization. An actual or potential conflict of interest arises when the Chair is placed in a situation in which: His or her personal interests, financial or otherwise, or The interests of an immediate family member or of a person with whom there exists, or has recently existed, an intimate relationship,.. conflict or appear to conflict with the Chair s responsibilities to the board, the Foundation and our many diverse constituents. The Foundation Chair shall not knowingly participate in any decision that appears to directly or preferentially benefit the Chair or any individual with whom the Chair has an immediate family, intimate or commercial relationship. 7