Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 November 2017

Similar documents
Tax incentives on Research and Development (R&D) 16 September 2014

Cyprus Tax News Amendments to Cyprus s IP regime

Belgian R&D tax incentives

Tax changes for 2018 disclosed in the new budget bill

Information Sheet No. 66. The New Intellectual Property (IP) Tax Regime in Cyprus

The patent box and I.P. tax regime under Action 5

Intellectual property rights in Luxembourg (IPR): tax exemption

Cyprus Tax Update. Kyiv May 2018

New tax regime for intellectual property rights

Cross-border Outsourcing

International Tax Belgium Highlights 2018

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

Innovation Incentives R&D Relief

Knowledge Development Box Utilising it for maximum benefit

Annual International Bar Association Conference Sydney, Australia. Recent Developments in International Taxation. Republic of Cyprus

1. Corporate Income Tax

Belgium Country Profile

Luxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime

Setting-up shop in the US - tax aspects

BELGIUM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

Innovation Tax Incentives March 2017

The Netherlands Digital Gateway to Europe 2016 Meijburg & Co, Tax Lawyers, is an association of limited liability companies under Dutch law,

Exploiting Intellectual Property Rights: Key Attractions of Locating Operations in Ireland

LUXEMBOURG GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

THE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015

BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP

Tax Reform (TRAF / Tax Proposal 17) Webcast of 2 October 2018

Patent Box 29 May 2012

Parent Subsidiary Directive and Interest and Royalty Directive

Principles of International Tax Planning

ROMANIA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

Gene Ferraro, Mazars USA LLP New York, NY William D. James, BKD, LLP St. Louis, MO

PATENT BOX HOW TO REDUCE UK CORPORATION TAX

Intellectual Property Valuation and Innovation

Coming to America. U.S. Tax Planning for Foreign-Owned U.S. Operations. By Len Schneidman. Andersen Tax LLC, U.S.

IP valuation, exploitation and finance

Transfer Pricing Forum

RSM InterTax Tax Insights February Belgian corporate income tax reform

Finance Bill Finance Bill Draft legislation on modified UK patent box. Executive Summary. December 2015

2018 Tax Budget. new perspectives UPDATE BDO TAX ADVISORS

Panama s Minister of Economy and Finance proposes bill for calculating income subject to preferential tax treatment under an IP regime

Consultation on modified UK patent box

3.2. EU Interest-Royalty Directive Background and force

SWITZERLAND GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Investment deduction for R&D

Taxing Intellectual Property: CFC rules and the Patent Box 3 March Group Finance Controllers Functions Insurance Taxation Treasury

Intellectual property in the age of BEPS

e-commerce and Transfer Pricing

SEMINAR ON TRANSFER PRICING 23rd September, Valuation Approaches and their applicability under Transfer Pricing. CA Siddharth Banwat

Table of Contents. Acknowledgements. Foreword. and Essential Legal and Accounting Knowledge 1

Intellectual property and the Patent Box

BEPS AND BEYOND BEPS: A BRAVE NEW WORLD IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TAXATION?

The Knowledge Development Box ( KDB ) Public Consultation Paper. We are writing to respond to the above named document issued on 14 January 2015.

STEP Silicon Valley Ireland: Gateway to Accessing the EU Market

Indirect tax forum VAT establishments April 2018

Defining Intellectual Property The Tax Implications

CYPRUS TAX STRUCTURES

New Swiss corporate tax developments : A paradigm shift?

Tax Insights. from India Tax & Regulatory Services. In brief. In detail. October 31, 2017

TAX CONSEQUENCES FOR CANADIANS DOING BUSINESS IN THE U.S.

IRAS e-tax Guide. Country-by-Country Reporting

Report on the Czech Republic

Cyprus Country Profile

PATENT BOX ON INTANGIBLE ASSETS

INTRODUCTION. Situations should be viewed separately based on specific facts of each scenario.

Executive summary. EY Global Tax Alert Library

Dutch Government publishes 2017 Budget Proposal

Patent Box FACTS CARD 2016 /

IP BOX TAX REGIMES. Rod Donnelly Thursday, September 14, 2017

Global Banking Service

TEI Tax Summit Asia Pacific. Hong Kong 31 August Baker & McKenzie

UK publishes draft legislation on modified patent box regime

New United States-Japan Tax Treaty Enters Into Force: New Withholding Rates Take Effect on July 1, 2004

OECD releases final BEPS package

Fact Sheet No.14 Corporate Tax and Depreciation

Cyprus Country Profile

Budget Seminar Overcoming the storm Chai Sui Fun and Falgun Thakkar PwC Singapore

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON

24 th Annual Health Sciences Tax Conference

Global Banking Service. Report on India

Tax Memento Luxembourg 2018

Generic Software Foundation Software Grant and Contributor License Agreement

FOREWORD. Mozambique. Services provided by member firms include:

EU Commission approves enhancements to Madeira International Business Center Tax Regime

Tax Briefing No 09. This content is more than 5 years old. Where still relevant it has been incorporated. into a Tax and Duty Manual

Cloud Computing Vered Kirshner, Tax Partner, PwC Israel Rayla Rappaport, Tax Senior Manager, PwC Israel November 2017

Film Financing and Television Programming: A Taxation Guide

Transfer pricing and intangible planning

Global Banking Service

Editorial. Inside. Volume 7 Issue 1 April 2017 European Tax Brief. Belgium: New Deduction for Innovation Revenue. European Union: EU

Tax. Proposal 17. Dispatch of Federal Council Overview of elements, implementation and impact

Additional retirement fund contributions

NEW ZEALAND. Country M&A Team Country Leader ~ Peter Boyce Arun David Declan Mordaunt Todd Stevens David Rhodes Eleanor Ward Mark Russell Peter J Vial

Skatteverket International Tax Planning 2016 CORIT

DISCUSSION PAPER TAX IMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FRS 138: INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Belgian corporate tax reform takes effect

BEPS Beyond Fortune 1000 October Armanino LLP amllp.com Armanino LLP amllp.com

The International Tax Landscape

Trends in IP Taxation in Thailand Roundtable discussion Tuesday 10 October 2017 IBA Annual Conference 2017 Sydney

TAX LAW CHANGES FOR 2013

Transcription:

Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23

1 Innovation income deduction (adopted by the Chamber of Representatives on 2 February 2017)

R&D incentives Innovation income deduction Patent income deduction 85% exemption of net innovation income resulting in 5,1% effective tax on innovation income Applies to a broad category of IP income both from licensing and sales 80% exemption of gross patent income resulting in 6,8% effective tax on patent income Applies to patent income derived from licensing and sales R&D investment deduction / tax credit One-time / spread investment deduction resulting in tax savings up to 6,5% of qualifying R&D investments Alternative: equivalent R&D tax credit Employment related incentives 80% payroll withholding tax exemption for qualifying researchers Expat status for foreign researchers temporarily assigned to Belgium Remuneration for copyright transfer Other incentives Exemption of regional R&D grants Foreign tax credit Notional interest deduction for equity funded R&D activities 3

Application in time Innovation income deduction ( IID ) replaces patent income deduction ( PID ) that was abolished as from 1 July 2016. Grandfathering: for patents requested or acquired before 1 July 2016, taxpayers can still apply PID until 30 June 2021 (irrevocable option). To be decided per IP right. 1/7/2016 1/7/2021 1/1/2016 1/1/2017 1/1/2018 1/1/2019 1/1/2020 1/1/2021 PID IID Qualifying taxpayers IID is available to Belgian resident companies and Belgian PE s of foreign companies. There are no specific conditions for SME s. 4

Qualifying intangibles (1) A company should have the full ownership, co-ownership, usufruct or licence of or right on: Patents and supplementary protection certificates. Breeders rights. Orphan drugs. Data and market exclusivity. IP of copyrighted software. Trademarks and other marketing related intangibles never qualify for IID. 5

Qualifying intangibles (2) IP of copyrighted software must: Result from a research or development project as defined for the purposes of the partial exemption of wage withholding tax. It is sufficient that activities qualify as a research or development project as defined for the purposes of the partial exemption of wage withholding tax. It is not required that the exemption actually applies. Other conditions for claiming this exemption may not be fulfilled (e.g. development by persons not having a qualifying degree or freelancers). Taxpayers may request a binding advice from BELSPO. If the taxpayer did not request a binding advice from BELSPO, the tax authorities may do so. Not have generated income before 1 July 2016. A derivative work or adjustment of an existing computer program can be new. If a copyrighted basis computer program generated income before 1 July 2016, income from a derivative work or adjustment that did not generate income before 1 July 2016 may still qualify. 6

Qualifying intangibles (3) For an activity to be an R&D activity, the OECD provides that it must be: Novel Creative Uncertain Systematic Transferable and/or reproducible Innovation is almost always R&D. 7

Qualifying intangibles (4) The OECD has specific guidelines for classifying software development as R&D: Completion must be dependent on a scientific and/or technological advance, the aim must be the systematic resolution of a scientific and/or technological uncertainty. Software that is part of an overall R&D project (e.g. to record its different stages) as well as R&D associated with, or embedded in, software as end product could be classified as R&D. Software development is an integral part of many projects that in themselves have no element of R&D. The software development component of such projects, however, may be classified as R&D if it leads to an advance in the area of computer software. An upgrade, addition or change to an existing program or system may be classified as R&D if it embodies scientific and/or technological advances resulting in increase of stock of knowledge. Use of software for a new application or purpose does not by itself constitute an advance. Software-related activities of a routine nature are not to be considered R&D. 8

Qualifying intangibles (5) The OECD lists examples of activities that can or cannot be considered R&D: R&D Development of new operating systems or languages Design and implementation of new search engines based on original technologies Resolution of conflicts within hardware or software based on the process of re-engineering a system or network Creation of new or more efficient algorithms based on new techniques Creation of new and original encryption of security techniques Experimental development new software for home banking R&D related to e-commerce applications, electronic banking, Internet-related services. Mathematical research relating to financial risk analysis Development of risk models for credit policy Investigating consumer behaviour for purpose of creating new types of banking services Research to identify new risks that need to be taken into account in insurance contracts Not R&D Adding using functionality to existing application programs (including basic data entry functionalities) Development of business application software and information systems using known methods and existing software tools Creation of websites or software using existing tools Use of standard methods of encryption, security verification and data integrity testing Customisation of product for particular use, unless knowledge is added that significantly improves the base program Routine debugging of existing systems and programs, unless this is done prior to end of experimental development process Etc. 9

Qualifying income Different categories of income may qualify: Licence income. Income embedded in sales income, i.e. the licence fee that a third party would pay if that third party produced the goods or delivered services on the basis of a licence granted by the company. Income derived from process innovation. Indemnities received on the base of a court/arbitral decision, amicable settlement or insurance contract. Proceeds derived from the sale of an IP right that has the nature of a fixed asset and which was (1) created no later than during the previous taxable period or (2) acquired no later than in the course of the last 24 months (reinvestment condition applies within 5 years). The arm s length nature needs to be respected. 10

Modified nexus In order to install a direct nexus between the income qualifying for the IID and the expenditures contributing to that income, the following formula is to be applied: Qualifying expenditure incurred to develop IP asset Overall expenditure incurred to develop IP asset x 85% x Net innovation income = Innovation income deduction Qualifying expenditure Expenditure directly connected to IP asset incurred by the company itself or compensation for outsourced R&D activities to non-related companies. Excl.: interest, building cost, acquisition costs, etc. Uplift of 30%. Proportional inclusion if costs are not exclusively related to the IP asset. Overall expenditure Cumul of years Qualifying expenditure, expenditure for related party outsourcing and acquisition costs for the qualifying intangibles. Current year Gross income of current year Worldwide income in the Belgian taxable result. Irrelevant where IP is protected. Deduction of overall expenditure of that year Incl.: employee costs, depreciations of acquired IP, etc. Excl.: interest, building cost, acquisition costs, etc. Recapture of costs applies in certain cases 11

Other features Temporary exemption while patents, breeder s right, orphan drugs or data and market exclusivity are still under request. As the copyright of software automatically exists without request (if certain conditions are met ), there is no temporary exemption. Possible carry-forward of unused IID without any limitation in time or amount. Tax neutrality in case of tax free transactions. 12

Tax ruling Possibility: Qualifying intangibles. Qualifying innovation income. Calculation method for embedded income. Necessity: Deviation from modified nexus ratio Ratio equals or exceeds 25%. Before 30% uplift. Rebuttable presumption (if proof of higher added value). Be mindful: exchange of rulings in EU countries. 13

Documentation requirements Taxpayers have to carefully track and trace the qualifying expenditure and qualifying income. Supporting documentation per IP such as: Actual value of IP acquired from related company. Gross amount of the qualifying income. Overall expenditure of current year. Qualifying and overall expenditures of all years. Transitional period up to and including tax year 2019. Specific report must be added to the tax return. 14

Example IID in the hands of the Belgian company Own development Costs in previous years (5.000) Belgian company Licence (10.000) 10% annual royalty Foreign licensee Product sales (100.000) Customers Innovation income: (10.000) Qualifying expenditure: (5.000) Overall expenditure: (5.000) Of which overall expenditure in current year: (0) 1. Qualifying expenditure + uplift Qualifying expenditure 5.000 + 30% uplift 0 5.000 2. Overall expenditure Qualifying expenditure 5.000 + expenditure for related party outsourcing 0 + acquisition costs 0 5.000 3. Net innovation income Innovation income 10.000 - overall expenditure in current year 0 Net innovation income 10.000 4. IID 10.000 x 85% = 8.500 5. Effective tax rate ( ETR ) [(10.000 8.500) *33,99%] / 10.000 = 5,1% 15

2 Conclusions and key takeaways

Conclusions and key takeaways 1 Time to act! 2 Assess feasibility of IID for software and derivative work or adjustments 3 Estimate your benefit 4 5 Get confirmation from BELSPO and/or Ruling Commission Tracking and tracing 17

Questions?

Contacts Tom Wallyn Director +32 9 268 80 21 tom.wallyn@pwc.com This presentation does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the taxation law of Belgium. It does neither cover the taxation principles of any other country referred to in this presentation. It is intended only to highlight general topics which may be of interest to our clients. For questions relating to this document please contact your local tax services advisors or the specialist listed in this document. This document has been prepared for general guidance only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this memo without obtaining specific professional advice. The materials contained in this presentation were assembled in February 2017 and were based on the law enforceable and information available at that time. provides services in compliance with the deontological and other professional standards of the IAB/IEC, taking into account the relevant legislation and regulations applicable. cannot be held liable for the effects of future possible changes with possible retroactive effect - to these statutory and regulatory provisions, nor can be responsible for the effects of possible shortcomings, faults or breaches which are committed before s assistance. To that extent, will not consider whether the facts submitted to or the topics included in this document may give rise to a finding that the Client or any other party is the recipient of State aid within the meaning of Article 107 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, Business Advisors bcvba, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. 2017 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.