Covering Coverage - From A to Z. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy M. McCutcheon Esq., CPA, MBA

Similar documents
Common Problems in M&A: The 410(b)(6) Transition Period. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA

Correcting Elective Deferral Failures. Stephen W. Forbes, J.D., LL.M. (taxation) Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA

EPCRS PART II Correction Tips and Tricks. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA

Ethics: Do s and Don ts for Those Administering Plans. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA S. Derrin Watson, Esq., APM

401(k) Plan Testing 101. Kimberly B. Martin, APA, CPC, QPA NIPA, Education Director Bates & Company, Inc., Account Executive

Participant Loan Failures: Self Correction vs. VCP Correction. Stephen W. Forbes, J.D., LL.M. (taxation) Timothy McCutcheon, Esq.

A Practical Guide to ERISA Research. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy McCutcheon, Esq., CPA, MBA

Correcting 401(k) Testing and Errors The New EPCRS. Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC Avaneesh Bhaget, Group Manager, IRS

401(a)(26), Top Heavy, and Coverage Basics for Defined Benefit Plans

Coming to Grips with Qualified Business Income. S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM Timothy McCutcheon, JD, CPA, MBA

Understanding 403(b) Universal Availability S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM

Compliance Tests What Are They and How Do I Interpret the Results? By: Janice Herrin & Melissa Howard, CPC, QPA, QKA

Comprehensive Guide to Yearly Compliance Activities

Make ADP/ACP Testing Great Again. Steve Riordan, CPC, QPA, QKA Director of Testing and Reporting Services Fidelity Investments

Forfeitures Used to Fund Safe Harbor Contributions

Compliance Coordination

Corporate Mergers, Acquisitions, & Spin-Offs Tuesday, April 30, 2013

401(k) Plan Testing 201

Understanding the advantages and challenges of this retirement plan. Can you establish a SIMPLE IRA? Sole proprietorships. Partnerships.

The Alert Guidelines are tools used by Employee Plans Specialists during their review of retirement plans and are available to plan sponsors to use

Common ERISA Compliance Problems and How to Correct Them

STRATEGIC PLAN DESIGN: SMART SOLUTIONS FOR OVERCOMING FAILED ADP/ACP TESTING

ADP Testing: Conquering the Calculations

Advanced Compliance Testing How to Put the Rules to Work for Plan Sponsors

401(k) Plan Nondiscrimination Testing: Guidance for Employee Benefits Counsel

EPCRS: REV. PROC

Compensation Part I: Allowable Definitions and When to Use Them. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Managing Partner Ferenczy Benefits Law Center

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED MONEY PURCHASE PLAN

Using the Power of Coverage Testing for Creative Plan Design. Kevin J. Donovan, CPA, EA, MSPA, FCA, Managing Member Pinnacle Plan Design, LLC

EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems. Avannesh K. Bhagat, IRS Robert M. Richter, J.D., LL.M., VP, FIS Relius

EPCRS Part I - Directly Resolving Plan Problems

Correcting Qualified Plan Errors under EPCRS

TAG Frequently Asked Questions. Presented By: Susan M. Wright, CPA, APM

PENSION EDUCATOR SERIES GLOSSARY

Coverage and Nondiscrimination Testing with Related Employers S. Derrin Watson, JD, APM. Copyright 2017 S. Derrin Watson, all rights reserved

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC NON-STANDARDIZED DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PRE-APPROVED PLAN

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC STANDARDIZED 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN

Nondiscrimination Rules for Cafeteria Plans

ASPPA s Quarterly Journal for Actuaries, Consultants, Administrators and Other Retirement Plan Professionals

Errors and Acceptable Correction Methods, Index

ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR FIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS LLC VOLUME SUBMITTER 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN

MULTIPLE EMPLOYER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

Overview of Cafeteria Plan Nondiscrimination Testing

SARSEP. Salary Reduction Simplified Employee Pension. for Small Businesses. Internal Revenue Service. Tax Exempt and Government Entities

The Plan Sponsor s Guide to Eligibility

CAUTION: Failure to properly fill out this Adoption Agreement may result in disqualification of the Plan.

Errors and acceptable correction methods Revised May 2017

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION SECTION OF TAXATION MAY MEETING 2003 COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

DEFINED CONTRIBUTION VOLUME SUBMITTER PLAN AND TRUST BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT [DC-BPD #04]

TYPES OF QUALIFIED PLANS

Controlled Group Case Studies. Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., APA, CPC, Managing Partner, Ferenczy + Paul LLP

Testing & Reporting Services. Glossary

ADVANCED MARKETS BUSINESS PLANNING

Understanding Nondiscrimination Testing

1/6/2016. Compliance Issues: When Molehills become Mountains. 1. Reporting or using incorrect compensation

SIMPLEs SIMPLE-IRA. Savings Incentive Match Plans for Employees of Small Employers & for Self-Employed Individuals. Questions & Answers

Conference Line PLEASE CALL THIS NUMBER (800)

Employee Benefit Plan Section 401(k) Requirements (Worksheet Number 12 Determination of Qualification)

Compliance Checklist 2005 For Defined Benefit Plans, Defined Contribution Plans, and 403(b) Plans that are subject to ERISA.

EPCRS Part 1 - The Joy of Self-Correction

EPCRS Part 1 - The Joy of Self-Correction

ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES FOR SERVICE PROVIDERS

ACCUDRAFT PROTOTYPE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLAN BASIC PLAN # 01

The Q&A committee solicits, screens and submits questions from ASPPA members to various government agency panelists as part of the ASPPA Annual

VOLUME SUBMITTER ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR THE DATAIR CASH OR DEFERRED PROFIT SHARING PLAN

Small business plans Business owner guide

2013 Retirement Plan Summary

Guide to your Year End Compliance Test Package

April 24, Filed electronically via to

Columbia Management No-Fee SIMPLE IRA

Auto Enrollment: Best Practices and Common Mistakes. Robert M. Richter, Esq., APM Vice President FIS Relius Wealth and Management

Entrust. New. Instructions STEP STEP STEP STEP. SUBMIT BY MAIL The Entrust Group SUBMIT BY FAX

Common Compliance Issues and Remedies

SEP UPDATING USE PROTOTYPE OR IRS FORM 5305-SEP?

Introduction January 31st, January 15th January 31st

Correcting Administrative Errors in DC Plans. Jane Armstrong, Esq., Phelps Dunbar LLP

Section 414(v). Definitions and Special Rules

THE LIFE OF A PLAN CASE STUDY Acquisitions. Charles D. Lockwood, J.D., L.LM ASC

Choosing a Retirement Plan for Your Business

2011 Year-End Compliance Information

401(K) PLAN GUIDE. You Hired Employees, Now What? and How To Avoid IRS Taxes & Penalties

December 26, Carol Weiser Acting Benefits Tax Counsel U.S. Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20220

403(b) ADOPTION AGREEMENT FOR METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

The Q&A committee solicits, screens and submits questions from ASPPA members to various government agency panelists as part of the ASPPA Annual

Test it, Find it, Fix it!

Introductions. Test it, Find it, Fix it! Session format Questions 2015 MACPA EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN CONFERENCE

9/23/2015. Combo Plan Design. Norman Levinrad, EA, FSPA, MAAA Summit Benefit & Actuarial Services, Inc.

Volume Submitter 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Adoption Agreement

HEALTH CARE COST SOLUTIONS, INC. HEALTH CARE COST SOLUTIONS PENSION PLAN AMENDMENT #3


DC-1: Defined Contribution Administrative Issues Basic Concepts 2014 Syllabus

IRS Issues New Proposed Cafeteria Plan Regulations

Sample Plan Sponsor Profit Sharing Plan Valuation as of December 31, 2015 IRC401(k) ADP Test

It is intended that this written material will meet the requirements necessary to qualify for Continuing Education Credits.

403(b) PLAN BASIC PLAN DOCUMENT

The Basic Rules of Cross-Testing

Q&As from Definitions of Compensation for Retirement Plans Webinar. June 20, 2012

SYLLABUS TAXATION OF COMPENSATION Spring Semester 2010 Instructor: David Pittman

tagdata.com EPCRS Case Studies August 3, 2017

file://\\asppa-fs\web\asppa.org\public_html\archive\gac\2005\ htm

Transcription:

Covering Coverage - From A to Z Ilene H. Ferenczy, Esq., CPC, APA Timothy M. McCutcheon Esq., CPA, MBA

Your Presenters Today Ilene H. Ferenczy, JD, CPC, APA Tim McCutcheon, JD, CPA, MBA 2

Covering Coverage From A to Z Facilitator: Chuck Gouge Question Board Moderator Joanne Pecina 3

During the Webinar All attendees lines are muted We will try to answer questions as we go. Send questions to all panelists. Slides and recording of webinar are available from ERISApedia.com/webcasts Certificates for CE credits will be sent in a few days. PLEASE check spam folders. 4

Key Concepts We Will Cover How does a plan satisfy coverage testing? What is the ratio percentage test (RPT)? What is the average benefit test (ABT)? How does the last day rule affect coverage? What is benefiting? Who is an excluded employee for testing? Who is included in the coverage test? When is a plan deemed to pass coverage? What happens if the coverage test is failed? How is a failed test corrected? 5

Introduction to Coverage Rules 6

Coverage Employees can be excluded from the plan by classification: Job class Geographic location Business division Even by name 7

Coverage These exclusions are permitted only if the plan still covers a broad cross section of employees Coverage testing determines that this requirement is met As with all nondiscrimination related testing, the coverage test compares HCEs to NHCEs 8

Coverage There are two ways to demonstrate that coverage rules have been met 1. Ratio Percentage Test (RPT) Easy to do Compares % of benefiting HCEs to % of benefiting NHCEs there is an acceptable tolerance rate 2. Average Benefit Test (ABT) More complex to do Compares both % and average benefits of HCEs to those of NHCEs 9

Ratio Percentage Test 10

Steps 1. Who is the employer for testing purposes? 2. Who is in the workforce being tested? 3. Who are the excludable employees? 4. What is the testing group? 5. Categorize all employees in the testing group by HCE and NHCE 6. Who is benefiting under the plan? 7. Perform the ratio percentage test 11

Ratio Percentage Test % benefiting NHCEs Must be at least 70% of % benefiting HCEs Less: Excludable Employees NonExcludable HCEs ALL EMPLOYEES of the EMPLOYER NonExcludable NHCEs Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan 12

Step 1: Who Is the Employer? The plan sponsor; and All members of the controlled/affiliated service group Be careful of foreign parents with other US subsidiaries 13

Step 2: Who Is in the Workforce? Workforce includes all employees Leased employees included: Leasing organization is common law employer; Leasing organization contracts to make individual available to the recipient for a fee; Recipient has primary direction and control over the individual; and The individual performs services on a substantially full time basis for at least one year 14

Step 3: Excludable Employees % benefiting NHCEs Must be at least 70% of % benefiting HCEs Less: Excludable Employees ALL EMPLOYEES of the EMPLOYER NonExcludable HCEs NonExcludable NHCEs Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan 15

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? Remember: this is for the coverage test only, and not for participation The question is: who is not part of the coverage test? 16

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? An excludable employee is one who, for the entire testing period: a) Does not meet age/service requirements; b) Collectively bargained and plan does not cover union employees; c) Nonresident alien (no U.S. source income); or d) Participant who is not employed on last day of the plan year, has fewer than 501 hours, and is not benefiting under the plan 17

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3a: Did not meet age/service: Plan must have age/service requirements Individuals who have completed eligibility requirements but have not yet entered are excludable Example: Louise completed the eligibility requirements for the plan on 10/25/16. Her entry date is 1/1/17. Louise is an excludable employee for the 2016 calendar plan year 18

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3a: Did not meet age/service: Note: someone who is not eligible to enter the plan due to age/service but is allowed to roll over his/her account from another plan is a limited participant and is excludable 19

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3b: Union employees Benefits must have been the subject of good faith bargaining If employee was union employee for part of the year, he/she is not an excludable employee for that year Exclusion works vice versa in union plan Davis Bacon employees are not collectively bargained 20

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3c: Nonresident aliens Note: this means: Not U.S. citizen ( alien ) Not U.S. resident ( nonresident ) Performing services and getting paid for work done outside the U.S. ( no U.S. source income ) Note: Puerto Ricans, Virgin Islanders, Guamanians are not aliens 21

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3d: Terminated with < 501 hours and not benefiting Conditions for this exclusion: Otherwise eligible to participate; Plan has minimum hours or last day requirement to accrue a contribution allocation; Participant fails to earn an allocation because of this requirement; AND Participant is not employed on the last day of the plan year, has fewer than 501 hours, and is not benefiting 22

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3d: Terminated with < 501 hours and not benefiting Example Joe has been a participant in the plan for four years. Plan has a last day requirement for allocations. Joe terminates during the year after completion of 400 hours. Joe does not get a contribution allocation due to the operation of the last day requirement. Joe is an excludable employee. 23

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3d: Terminated with < 501 hours and not benefiting Example Joe has been a participant in the plan for four years. Plan has a last day requirement for allocations. Joe terminates during the year after completion of 800 hours. Joe does not get a contribution allocation due to the operation of the last day requirement. Joe is an not excludable employee because he has more than 500 hours. 24

Step 3: Who Is Excludable? 3d: Terminated with < 501 hours and not benefiting Example Joe has been a participant in the plan for four years. Plan has a 1,000 hours requirement for allocations. Joe terminates during the year after completion of 800 hours. Joe does not get a contribution allocation due to the operation of the 1,000 hour requirement. Joe is an not excludable employee because he has more than 500 hours. 25

Step 4: Testing Group % benefiting NHCEs Must be at least 70% of % benefiting HCEs Less: Excludable Employees NonExcludable HCEs ALL EMPLOYEES of the EMPLOYER NonExcludable NHCEs Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan 26

Step 4: What Is the Testing Group? The testing group is the remaining employees after the excludable employees have been removed Note that this is not necessarily the people who are actually in the plan. It just represents those includable in the testing 27

Step 5: Characterize All Members of the Testing Group Each member of the testing group must be identified as either an HCE or an NHCE 28

Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Whether someone is benefiting is determined separately for these parts of the plan: Nonelective contributions 401(k) salary deferrals Matching contributions If the plan has each of these features, the test will need to be done three times 29

Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Nonelective contributions: Benefiting means receiving an allocation of contributions or forfeitures for the plan year If there is no nonelective contribution, no one is benefiting 30

Example: Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? A plan has last day rule and a 1,000 hour requirement Currier and Ives are both participants in the plan Currier had 1,500 hours of service and received an allocation Ives has 800 hours of service and has not terminated, but received no allocation Currier is benefiting, Ives is not 31

Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Elective contributions: Under the Plan? Benefiting means being eligible to defer, whether the participant did so or not 32

Example: Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Fred entered the plan on 7/1 and was eligible to make salary deferrals for the balance of the calendar year Barney was a participant in the plan and terminated employment on 3/1. He was eligible to defer up until he terminated Wilma was eligible to defer until 10/20, when she became an excluded union employee 33

Example: Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? As all three employees could have deferred had they chosen to do so during the year, they are all benefiting 34

Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Matching contributions: Benefiting means the participant would receive a matching contribution if he or she deferred, whether they actually did or not 35

Example: Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Hawkeye deferred $1,000 to the plan and received a $500 matching contribution Trapper John chose not to defer, but his deferrals would have been matched had he done so Hot Lips terminated before year end after deferring $1,000. The plan has a last day rule for matching contributions Frank also terminated before year end but chose not to defer before that 36

Example: Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Hawkeye and Trapper John are both benefiting they either got a match or would have gotten one had they chosen to defer Hot Lips and Frank are not benefiting they either failed to get a match or would not have gotten one had they deferred 37

Step 6: Who Is Benefiting Under the Plan? Note: benefiting measures whether someone is getting anything in the plan It does not measure how much they get (as compared to anyone else) That is measured in the normal nondiscrimination testing (ADP, ACP, or general testing) 38

Step 7: Perform the Ratio Percentage Test NHCE ratio: # of benefiting NHCEs Total nonexcluded NHCEs HCE ratio: # of benefiting HCEs Total nonexcluded HCEs NHCE ratio/hce ratio must be at least 70% 39

Step 7: Perform the Test % benefiting NHCEs Must be at least 70% of % benefiting HCEs Less: Excludable Employees NonExcludable HCEs ALL EMPLOYEES of the EMPLOYER NonExcludable NHCEs Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan Benefiting Under the Plan Not Benefiting Under the Plan 40

Example #1 Employer A has 30 Employees, 5 of whom are HCEs, 25 of whom are NHCEs Subsidiary B has 250 Employees, 10 of whom are HCEs, 240 of whom are NHCEs Question: Can Employer A s Employees participate in a plan without covering the Employees of Subsidiary B? 41

Example #1 HCE %: 5/15 = 33.3% NHCE% 25/265 = 9.4% Less: Excludable Employees ALL EMPLOYEES of the EMPLOYER 70% of 33.3% = 23.31% Test is Failed Benefiting Under the Plan (5) NonExcludable HCEs (15) Not Benefiting Under the Plan (10) Benefiting Under the Plan (25) NonExcludable NHCEs (265) Not Benefiting Under the Plan (240) 42

Example #2 Employer A has 30 Employees, 5 of whom are HCEs Subsidiary B has 250 Employees, 10 of whom are HCEs Can Employer B s Employees participate in a plan without covering the Employees of Subsidiary A? 43

Example #2 HCE %: 10/15 = 66.7% NHCE% 240/265 = 90.6% 70% of 66.7% = 46.69% Test is Passed Benefiting Under the Plan (10) Less: Excludable Employees NonExcludable HCEs (15) ALL EMPLOYEES of the EMPLOYER Not Benefiting Under the Plan (5) Benefiting Under the Plan (240) NonExcludable NHCEs (265) Not Benefiting Under the Plan (225) 44

Aggregation and Disaggregation 45

Mandatory Disaggregation Employer required to disaggregate: 401(k) 401(m) 401(a) Although ADP and ACP testing permits shifting of QMACs and Elective Deferrals to pass testing, for coverage purposes they remain with like type funds 46

Permissive Aggregation May use two or more plans of the employer to meet the coverage test if: Plans have the same plan year; Plans are all qualified (no 403(b) or SEP) Plans are also tested on an aggregated basis for nondiscrimination 47

Elective Disaggregation Qualified separate lines of business (QSLOBs) Separate lines of business: can test QSLOBs separately as if they were separate, unrelated employers Each QSLOB must have at least 50 employees 48

Elective Disaggregation Can separately test Otherwise Excludable Otherwise Excludable means: participants who would not meet statutory eligibility requirements if the plan used them Do one coverage test for otherwise excludables Do one coverage test for those who are not excludable even if increased eligibility requirements If both tests pass, coverage is passed 49

Otherwise Excludable Note: controversy regarding entry dates If someone fulfills statutory eligibility requirements; and Would have entered the plan under the plan s entry dates; but Would not have entered if the plan used statutory entry dates, is he/she excludable? Controversy was resolved by IRS in General Counsel Memorandum 201615013: Yes 50

Dual Eligibility Requirements These rules apply if: One plan has multiple eligibility requirements; or Two plans are being aggregated but have different eligibility requirements Determine excludables using least restrictive age/service requirements 51

Example #3 Plan A and Plan B are being aggregated for coverage testing Plan A s eligibility requirements are age 21, 1 year of service Plan B s eligibility requirements are age 18, 3 months of service 52

Result: Example #3 Everyone in test older than 18 and with 3 months of service are in testing group Those in Plan A who are younger than 21 and have less than 1 year of service are not benefiting for purposes of the coverage test 53

Leased Employees Contributions or benefits provided by the leasing organization that are attributable to service performed for the recipient are treated as provided by the recipient Therefore, leased employees are generally considered to be benefiting 54

Deemed to Pass Coverage 55

Plans Deemed to Pass Coverage Collectively bargained plans No NHCEs in the testing group No HCEs benefiting in the plan 56

Failing Coverage 57

Effect of Failed Coverage Plan is subject to disqualification Under usual disqualification, only vested contributions made to a participant s account are taxed to the participant If plan is disqualified for coverage failure, entire vested HCE account is taxed through to the HCE, and plan is considered qualified for the NHCEs (unless disqualification has other reasons) 58

Correcting Failed Coverage Treas. Reg. 1.401(a)(4) 11(g)(3) permits a corrective amendment to be adopted up to 9½ months after the plan year end to correct failed testing Amendment must let in people who would otherwise not be eligible or benefit otherwise nonbenefiting participants (i.e., must provide for increased NHCE benefits) 59

Correcting Failed Coverage Examples: Failed 401(k) coverage: make QNEC to some NHCEs who were not permitted to defer Failed match coverage: make contribution to provide additional match to those who weren t eligible (or provide QNEC to people who were permitted to enter under amendment who did not previously receive a matching contribution in the plan) 60

Correcting Failed Coverage Examples: Failed nonelective coverage: May not reallocate that takes away earned allocations from others Must make additional contribution to allocate to previously excluded employees 61

Correcting Failed Coverage Some plans have failsafe provision: If so, must follow failsafe rules in the plan If violation is not corrected within 9 ½ months Demographic failure under EPCRS Must be done through VCP (self correction outside the 9 ½ months not permitted) Will render disqualification threat not applicable 62

Questions? 63

CE Credit ERPA/ASPPA/NIPA Will receive certificate by email in several days ERPA will take longer (please be patient) Please check spam folder Any questions, email: support@erisapedia.com 64

Contact Information Author of the Qualified Plan esource: Ilene H. Ferenczy Ferenczy Benefits Law Center (678) 399 6602 ilene@ferenczylaw.com Publisher of ERISApedia.com: Timothy M. McCutcheon (612) 605 2266 tmm@erisapedia.com / sales@erisapedia.com 65