Liquidity Performance of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Similar documents
A Case Study on Trend and Growth Analysis of Tata Consultancy Services Limited

Ratio Analysis An Accounting Technique of Analysis and Interpretation of Financial Statements

A study on liquidity and profitability position of national thermal power corporation limited New Delhi

IJEMR February Vol 5 Issue 2 - Online - ISSN Print - ISSN

Impact of dividend policy on firm value of select steel companies in India

CHAPTER - VI RATIO ANALYSIS 6.3 UTILITY OF RATIO ANALYSIS 6.4 LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS 6.5 RATIO TABLES, CHARTS, ANALYSIS AND

TURNOVER (OR) ACTIVITY PERFORMANCE OF UNIT TRUST OF INDIA

Financial Analysis of Sakthi Sugar Private Limited, Coimbatore

WORKING CAPITAL ANALYSIS OF SELECT CEMENT COMPANIES IN INDIA

A Study on Performance Evaluation of Selected Equity Mutual Funds in India

A STUDY ON LIQUIDITY AND SHORT-TERM SOLVENCY POSITION OF SELECT PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES IN INDIA

PROFITABILITY AND PRODUCTIVITY OF BANK OF INDIA

Impact of New Economic Policy on India s Foreign Trade

Working Capital and Liquidity Performance of Cement Companies - An Empirical Analysis

A Study on Cost of Capital

ANALYSIS OFFINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO BMTC, BANGALORE

Research Article Volume 6 Issue No. 5

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED PRIVATE SECTOR SUGAR COMPANIES IN TAMIL NADU AN EVALUATION.

To Evaluate Working Capital Management of Renuka Sugar Pvt. Ltd.

CHAPTER :- 4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE.

To Measure the Liquidity Of Selected Private Sector Pharmaceutical Companies in India

A STUDY ON ASSET UNDER MANAGEMENT OF INDIAN MUTUAL FUND INDUSTRY

CHAPTER-8 SUMMARY, FINDINGS & SUGGESTIONS

ANALYSIS ON RISK RETURN TRADE OFF OF EQUITY BASED MUTUAL FUNDS

Comparative Study of Ratio Analysis of selected Textile Companies of India

A study on capital structure analysis of Tata motors limited

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR BANKS IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Chapter 1. Research Methodology

A Study on MeASuring the FinAnciAl health of Bhel (ranipet) using Z Score Model

NON-PERFORMING ASSETS IS A THREAT TO INDIA BANKING SECTOR - A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN PRIORITY AND NON-PRIORITY SECTOR

Compound Growth Rate (CAGR), Coefficient of Variation (CV), Gearing, Linear Growth Rate (LGR). Long-term solvency, Short-term solvency,

A Comparative Financial Analysis of SAIL and TATA Steel Ltd.

CHAPTER 5 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED: A FRAMEWORK OF TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES EMPLOYED FOR DATA ANALYSIS

A Study of Economic Value Added (EVA) & Market Value Added (MVA) of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

condition & operating results in a condensed form. Financial statements are used as a

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF SALEM STEEL PLANT, SALEM

COMPETITIVE STRENGTH TOWARDS UNITE OF HDFC STANDARD LIFE INSURER AND MAX LIFE INSURER AGAINST OTHER PRIVATE LIFE INSURERS IN INDIA

A study on impact of cost structure on financial performance of selected pharmaceutical companies in India

Working Capital Analysis of Pricol Engineering Industries Limited at Coimbatore

AN APPRAISAL OF CORPORATE TAX IN INDIA: A SELF ASSESSMENT

Findings, Suggestions and Conclusion

FUNCTIONAL PROGRESS OF REGIONAL RURAL BANKS IN PRIORITY SECTOR LENDING: A CASE STUDY OF PUNJAB STATE

Selection of stock: A Practical study on Nationalised Banks

An Empirical Study on Working Capital Management of Ammayeppar Textiles Pvt Ltd Chennai

UNIT 6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION MODULE - 2

International Journal of Innovative Research in Management Studies (IJIRMS) ISSN (Online): Volume 1 Issue 4 May 2016

AN ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF POWER SECTOR IN TAMILNADU Dr. AB Angappapillai* 1, P Kandasamy 2. Tamilnadu, India. Tamilnadu, India.

CHAPTER-4 ANALYSIS OF LIQUIDITY

PAPER 7 : FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

International Journal of Exclusive Management Research June 2011-Vol 1 Issue 2 ISSN

A STUDY ON FINANCIAL ANALYSIS WITH REFERENCE TO NDMPMACU LTD., NELLORE, A.P.

RISK-RETURN RELATIONSHIP ON EQUITY SHARES IN INDIA

Commodity Price Movements - An Analysis

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PERFORMANCE AND WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF ICICI AND HDFC BANKS

CHAPTER V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

SAMPLE. MTBE Industry Outlook in India to 2016 GDCH1741IDB/DEC 2012

An apparaisal of financial performance: A comparative analysis of HDFC bank and ICICI bank

WEEK 10 Analysis of Financial Statements

IJRFM Volume 4, Issue 6(June 2014) (ISSN ) IMPACT FACTOR 4.088

A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF LIQUIDITY RATIOS ON PROFITABILITY OF SELECTED CEMENT COMPANIES IN INDIA

myepathshala.com (For Crash Course & Revision)

FAQ: Financial Ratio Analysis

All In One MGT201 Mid Term Papers More Than (10) BY

Management of cash in Public sector Enterprises - A case study of ECIL, Hyderabad

CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY

A Comparative Financial Analysis of TATA Steel Ltd. and SAIL

A ratio analysis of Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.

Capital Structure & Long Term Solvency: A Study on Central Coalfield Limited

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL OF HPCL THROUGH FREE CASH FLOW

A Study of the Top Private Sector Banks in India: A Comparative Analysis of the Financial Performance of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank

Study on Measurement and Management of Cash Flow Efficiency of Tata Steel Limited (Standalone Company)

Financial Performance of Kotak Mahindra Bank

Volume 5, Issue 12, December 2017 International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies

A STUDY OF TOP PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTOR BANKS IN INDIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THEIR FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

IMPACT OF ACQUISITIONS THROUGH VALUE ADDITION - A CASE STUDY OF TATA STEEL AND TATA POWER COMPANIES IN INDIA

The Liquidity and Solvency of the Oil Companies, Financial Analysis

Chapter 4 Financial Strength Analysis

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Review, Vol.1, Issue-35, January Page - 80

LESSON 6 RATIO ANALYSIS CONTENTS

FACTORS INFLUENCING BEHAVIOR OF MUTUAL FUND INVESTORS IN BENGALURU CITY - A STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH

Keywords: NBFC, Solvency, Current ratio, Liquid ratio, Debt equity ratio and Proprietary ratio

Factors affecting the share price of FMCG Companies

A Comparative Study on Markowitz Mean-Variance Model and Sharpe s Single Index Model in the Context of Portfolio Investment

Working Capital Management of Auto Component Industry

CHAPTER-5 DATA ANALYSIS PART-3 LIQUIDITY AND SOLVENCY

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS - AN INTRODUCTION

DATABASE AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Total 100 All learning outcomes must be evidenced; a 10% aggregate variance is allowed.

Impact of FDI on Industrial Development of India

A Study on Financial Performance Analysis of Spinning Mills of Coimbatore City

FINANCIAL WEALTH HEALTH OF MAWANA SUGAR MILL - A CASE STUDY

Comparative solvency analysis through optimum capital structure of Gail (India) Ltd. and ONGC Ltd.

Management Science Letters

Z SCORE ANALYSIS FOR EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL HEALTH OF INDIAN OIL REFINERIES. Erode.

INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DCCBs IN INDIA - A STUDY

Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance of Indian Commercial Banks An Analysis


Stock Price Sensitivity

TWO WAY FIXED EFFECT OF PRIORITY SECTOR LENDING (SECTOR WISE) ON NON PERFORMING ASSETS OF INDIAN COMMERCIAL BANKS

Transcription:

Liquidity Performance of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited MANOJKUMAR VISHNUBHAI PATEL Gujarat (India) Abstract: The petroleum industry involves the refining of crude petroleum and the processing of Natural Gas into a multitude of products, as well as the distribution and marketing of petroleum-derived products India has recently become the sixth largest consumer of oil and gas, with its oil consumption recording a compounded annual growth of 9.1 percent per annum. The objective of the present study is to analyze the liquidity and leverage performance of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and the Reliance Industries Limited. The present study attempts to analysis the performance of liquidity and leverage position of the and the RIL during the period 2006-2007 and 2010-2011. Liquidity is the company s ability to convert non cash assets into cash or to obtain cash in order to meet current liabilities. Liquidity applies to the short term, which is typically viewed as a time span of one year or less. The liquidity position of the can be further improved to increase the productivity with a view to meet the increased demand. The ability of the meet their financial obligation is more then standard norms. The management as the may take necessary steps to invest their funds in short term securities to strike a proper balance between high liquidity and low liquidity. Keywords: Absolute liquidity ratio,, Current assets ratio, Current ratio, Inventory liquid ratio, Liquidity, Working capital 1. Introduction At the time of independence in 1947, the oil and gas industry was controlled by international companies. India s domestic oil production was form one state. That is Assam. The foundation of the oil and gas industry in India was laid by the government announcement that petroleum would be the core sector industry of the country. The petroleum industry involves the refining of crude petroleum and processing of Natural Gas into a multitude of products, as well as the distribution and marketing of petroleum derived products. The primary pollutants emitted are volatile organic compounds arising from leakage, venting, and evaporation of the raw materials and finished products. Significant amounts of sulphur oxides, hydrogen sulphide, particulate matter, and a number of toxic species can also be generated from operation specific to the industries. India has recently become the sixth largest consumer of oil and gas, with its oil consumption recording a compounded annual growth of 9.1 percent per annum. 2. Objective of the Study The Objectives of the present study are to analyze the Liquidity and Leverage performance of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited and to offer suggestion to improve the financial performance of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited. 3. Source of Data The study mainly depends on secondary data and the required data were collected from the annual reports of the and the official websites of the companies. Books, Journals and Newspaper, magazines, etc. 56 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

4. Period of the Study The study covers a period of five years from 2006-2007 to 2010-2011 for which reliable information is available. The period selected for the study assumes significance since liberalization and several economic policy changes have taken place in the corporate scenario in recent time in India. 5. Tools for Analysis The surveyed data have been subjected to various statistical analyses and in this article the appropriate tools like,, Co-efficient of variation, Compounded Annualized Growth Rate (CAGR) Linear Growth Rate (LGR) and multiple Regression Analysis has been applied. 6. Analysis and Interpretation of Data A Company has to maintain good financial strength to with stand operating setbacks. In the present era of globalization privatization and liberalization, cut throat competition and removal of social inequalities, public enterprises have to be productive and run profitably not only in their own interest but also for the growth of the nation. Liquidity is the company s ability to convert non cash assets into cash or to obtain cash in order to meet current liabilities. The present study attempts to analysis the performance of liquidity during the period and. 7. Current Ratio Current Ratio, also called working capital ratio, is the most widely used of all financial devices based on the balance sheet. It matches the total assets to the total current liabilities. Current Ratio is calculated with the Following formula. Current Ratio = Current Assets / Current Liabilities Table 1 Current Ratio (Rs. in Crore ) Current Assets Current Liabilities Ratio (Time) 14841 12957 1.15 20971 16366 1.28 17275 14694 1.18 25928 19035 1.36 28658 24019 1.19 Co-Efficient of Variance Liner Growth Rate (Trend) 21535 5773 26.81 42.18(3.256) 3259(3.43) 17414 4319 24.80 37.58(3.99) 2479(3.75) 1.23 0.09 7.32 3.02(.54).02(.53) Required equation model is 1.191472+0.00005X1 Where Y= Current Ratio, X1=Current Assets, X2= Current Liabilities Result of Regression analysis Constant 1.191472 0.021303 55.923.0003 X1 0.0005 0.00003 16.291.0047 X2-0.000006 0.000004-14.551.0037 Source: Annual of Reports of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level Table 1 shows that the mean ratio for the was 1.23 times and the standard deviation ratio was (0.09), coefficient of variation was 7.32 percent, annualized compound growth rate ratio and linear growth rate ratio 3.02(0.54) and 0.02(0.53) respectively. From the regression equation model it is 57 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

found that both liquidity positions in terms of current ratio of the have been good during the period under study. The beta coefficient for current ratio is highly significant at the one percent level. 8. Quick Ratio The quick ratio is used to provide an indication of the solvency of a company. It describes the relationship between quick assets and current liabilities. It includes all current assets except inventories and prepaid expenses. Current liabilities include all current liabilities except bank overdraft. The Quick ratio is calculated with the following formula. Quick Ratio = Quick Asset / Current Liabilities Co-Efficient of Variation Linear Growth Rate (Trend) Table 2: Quick Ratio (Rs. in Crore) Quick Assets Current Liabilities 6180 12957 10367 16366 10451 14694 13899 19035 13283 24019 10836 3058 28.22 52.18 (3.48) 1773 (3.98) 17414 4319 24.80 37.58 (3.96) 2479 (3.75) Required equation model is.558086 + 0.00005X1 0.00003 X2 Where Y= Quick Ratio, X1= Quick Asset, X2=Current Liabilities Constant 1.191472.021303 55.929.0003 X1 0.0005 0.00003 16.291.0047 X2-0.000006 0.000004-14.551.0037 Ratio(Time) 0.48 0.63 0.71 0.73 0.55 0.62 0.11 17.74 10.14 (0.70) 0.024 (0.67) Source : Annual Reports of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level Table 2 shows that, the mean ratio for the was 0.62 times, the standard deviation ratio was 0.11, coefficient of variation was 14.94 percent, annualized compound growth rate ratio and the linear growth rate ratio was 10.14 (0.70) and 0.02(0.67) respectively. The regression equation model, it is found that both liquidity positions in term of quick ratio of the have been good during the period under study. The beta coefficient for quick ration is highly significant at one percent level. 9. Absolute Liquidity Ratio Cash is the most liquid asset: a financial analyst may examine the absolute liquidity ratio and its equivalent to current liabilities. Trade investment or marketable securities are the equivalent of cash. Absolute Liquidity Ratio = Cash + Marketable Securities / Current Liabilities. 58 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

Table 3 Absolute Liquidity Ratio (Rs. in Crore) Cash Current Liabilities 863 12957 10367 16366 10451 14694 13899 19035 13283 24019 Co-Efficient of Variation Linear Growth Rate (Trend) 10836 3058 28.22 52.18 (3.48) 1773 (3.98) 17414 4319 24.80 37.58 (3.96) 2479 (3.75) Required equation model is.022366 + 0.00006 X1-0.00001 X2 Where Y= Absolute Liquidity Ratio, X1 = Cash, X2= Current Liabilities Constant 1.191472.021303 55.929.0003 X1 0.00006 0.00001 4.542.0452 X2-0.000006 0.000004-4.551.3302 Ratio(Time) 0.07 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.02 17.74 50 (-5.66) -.01-4.95) Source : Annual Reports of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level. Table 3 show that the mean ratio for the was 0.04 times, the standard deviation ratio was(0.04), the coefficient of variation was 17.74 percent, annualized compound growth rate ratio and the linear growth rate ratio was 50 (-5.66) and.01 (-4.95)respectively. From the regression equation model, it is found that the liquidity position of absolute liquidity ratio of the have been good. The beta coefficient for the absolute liquidity ratio is highly significant at the one percent level. 9. Cash to Working Capital Ratio Cash is the most liquid form of asset, which safeguard the interest of the business. An analyses of cash to working capital helps to know the proportion of cash in the working capital. There is no rule of thumb. But a higher proportion of cash leads to the shrinkage of profits and lower proportion leads to the running short of cash. Cash to Working Capital Ratio = Cash Balance / Working Capital Table 4 Cash to Working Capital Ratio (Rs. In Crore ) Cash Working Capital 863 1884 961 4606 441 2581 341 6893 379 4640 Co-Efficient of Variation Linear Growth Rate (Trend) 597 292 48.88 46.07 (-3.20) 158 (-2.92) 4121 1973 47.87 37.58 (66.18) 779 (1.39) Ratio (Time) 45.81 20.86 17.09 4.95 8.71 19.38 16.12 83.20 67.54 (-3.52) 9.12 (-3.46) Required equation model is.22.360467 +.027465 X1 -.004703 59 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

Where Y=Cash to Working Capital Ratio, X1=Cash, X2=Working Capital Constant 8.927089 1.181.3589 X1.027465.018048 1.522.2675 X2 -.004703.002670-1.761.2202 Source : Annual Reports of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level Table 4 shows that the mean ratio for the was 19.38 times, standard deviation ratio was 16.12 time and the coefficient of variation 83.20 percent, annualized compound growth rate ratio and the linear growth rate ratio of the was -67.54(-3.52) and -9.12(-3.46) respectively. From the equation model, it is found that the liquidity in term of cash to working capital ratio have been good during the period under study. The beta coefficient for cash to working capital ratio is highly significant at the one percent level. 10. Cash to Current Asset Ratio The cash to current asset ratio denotes the level of cash maintained by a business. It indicates the extent to which a company can pay current liabilities without relying on the sale of inventory and without relying on the receipt of accounts receivable. The Cash to Current asset ratio is calculated with the following formula. Cash to current Asset Ratio = Cash Balance / Current Assets Table 5: Cash to Current Assets Ratio (Rs. in crore) Cash Current Assets 863 14841 961 20971 441 17275 341 25928 379 28658 Co-Efficient of Variation Linear Growth Rate (Trend) 597 292 48.88 46.07 (-3.20) 158 (-2.92) 21535 5773 26.81 42.18 (3.26) 3259 (3.43) Ratio(Time) 5.81 4.58 2.55 1.32 1.32 3.12 2.01 64.45 62.05 (-6.77) 01.22(-6.14) Required equation model is.3.057975+.004872 X1-0.000132 Where Y=Cash to Current Asset Ratio X1=Cash, X2=Current Assets Constant 3.057975 1.776609 1.721.2273 X1.004872.001157 4.210.520 X2 -.000132,0.00058-2.263.1520 Source : Annual Report of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level Table 5 shows that, the mean ratio for the was 3.12 times, the standard deviation ratio were (2.01) and coefficient of variation (64.45percent) annualized compound growth rate and the linear growth rate was -62.05 (-6.77) and -1.22(-6.14) respectively. From the equation model, it is found that the liquidity position and the growth terms of cash to current asset ratio have been good during the period under study.the beta coefficient for cash to current asset ratio are highly significant at the one percent level. 60 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

11. Working Capital to Capital Employed Ratio The working capital to capital employed ratio is used as a measure of a firm s liquidity. The working capital is the excess of current asset over the current liabilities. Capital employed refers to long-term funds in the balance sheet. It represents the long-term foundation funds of the company. Working Capital to Capital Employed Ratio = Working Capital / Capital Employed Table 6: Working Capital to Capital Employed Ratio (Rs. in crore ) Working Capital Capital Employed Ratio(Time) 1884 13717 0.14 4606 17342 0.27 2581 16584 0.16 6893 23080 0.30 4640 21651 0.21 Standard Deviatiion Co-Efficient of Variation Annualized Compound Growth Rate Linear Growth Rate (Trend) 4121 1973 47.87 66.18 (1.58) 779 (1.39) 18475 3834 20.75 31.79 (357) 2160.60 (3.40) 0.22 0.07 31.82 23.49 (.86) 0.02 (.74) Required equation model is.217528+.000054x1-0.000012 Where Y=Working Capital ratio, X1=Working Capital X2=Capital Employed Constant.217528.057524 3.782.0290 X1 0.000054 0.000009 5.748.0290 X2-0.000012 0.000004-2.509.1289 Source : Annual Reports of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level Table 6 shows that the mean ratio for the was 0.22 times, the standard deviation ratio was 0.07, coefficient of variation was 31.82 percent, annualized compound growth rate and the linear growth rate was 23.49(.86) and 0.02(.74) respectively. From the equation model, it is found that the liquidity position in term of working capital to capital employed ratio of the have been good during the period the period under study. The beta coefficient for working capital to capital employed ratio is highly significant at the one percent level. 12. Inventory to Working Capital Ratio Inventory to working capital ratio is calculated to ascertain whether the company has overstocking or not. The ratio is a measure of the safety factor available for the protection of short-term creditor. Increase in the volume of sales requires increase in the size of the inventory, but the inventory should not exceed the a memorandum of undertakings of the current assets. Inventory to working capital ratio = Inventory / Working Capital 61 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

Table 7: Inventories to Working Capital Ratio (Rs.in crore) Inventories Working Capital Ratio(Time) 8621 1884 4.60 10604 4606 2.30 6824 2581 2.64 12029 6893 1.75 15375 4640 3.31 Standard Deviatiion Co-Efficient of Variation Annualized Compound Growth Rate Linear Growth Rate (Trend) 10699 3272 3058 34.09(1.48) 1485.30(1.79) 4121 1973 47.87 66.18(1.58) 779.90(1.39) 2.92 1.10 37.67 23.92(-.76) 0.31(-.88) Required equation model is3.406125+0.0002x1-0.0006x2 Where Y=Inventory to Working Capital Ratio,X1=Inventory X2=Working Capital Constant.217528.057524 3.782.0634 X1 0.000054 0.000009 5.748.0290 X2-0.000012 0.000004-2.509.1289 Source : Annual Reports of the 2007-2011. Significant at 1% level Table 7 Show that, the mean ratio for the was 2.92 times, standard deviation were 1.10, coefficient of variation 44.44 percent, annualized compound growth rate ratio and the linear growth rate ratio of the were -23.92(-.76) and -.31(-.88) respectively. From the equation model, it is found that both of the liquidity position and the growth in terms inventories to working capital ratio of the have been good during the period under study. The beta coefficient for the inventory to working capital ratio is highly significant at the one percent level. 13. Suggestions for Improvement 1. The liquidity position of the can be further improved to increase the productivity with a view to meet the increased demand and 2. The ability of the meet their financial obligation is more than standard norms. The may ensure that they do not suffer from the lack of liquidity or excess liquidity. The management as the should take necessary steps to invest their funds in short term securities to strike a proper balance between high liquidity and low liquidity. 14. Conclusion It is concluded from the study that the have achieved greater penetration. The high growth achieved in recent year is because of the development of petroleum companies. The Indian petroleum companies play a meaningful role References 1. Government of India (2013). Annual Report ministry of Oil & Gas Ministry, New Delhi. 62 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com

2. Kolluru, S.(2005). A study of performance of Indian Oil Companies during 1999-2003.The IVP Journal of Applied Economics 5(4):51-60. 3. Pandy, I.M. (2008). Financial Management, Vikas Pub. House Pvt. Ltd, Noida, 9 th ed. Reprint,520 4. Patra, S. (2005). Liquidity vs Profitability, Indian Journal of Accounting, 35 (2); 39-43. 5. Vikas, S. (2005). A study of Liquidity Management of Indian Oil Industry. 6. World Oil & Gas energy Association-2014 Sustainability Report of the World Oil & Gas Industry. 63 Online & Print International, Refereed, Impact factor & Indexed Monthly Journal www.raijmr.com