Trade Implications of the EU-US TTIP for Neighboring Countries

Similar documents
Trans- Paci*ic Partnership

EU Trade Policy and CETA

Mega-Regional Trading Arrangements: TPP and TTIP - how China and other emerging economy react to the new rules governing the trade and investment?

NAFTA Negotiations. Business Council of Canada Submission

Rue the ROOs: Rules of Origin and the Gains (or Losses) from Trade Agreements

EFTA FREE TRADE RELATIONS

Some Ways Forward with Trade Barriers

Transatlan(c Trade and Investment Partnership

Edexcel Economics A-level

India s Trade Policy and Global Trade Initiatives

OCR Economics A-level

The Rise Of Regionalism In The Multilateral System And Features Of Preferential Trade Agreements In Asia And The Pacific

Harnessing Globalisation to Build a Better World for the Benefit of All. Yose Rizal Damuri Centre for Strategic and International Studies

Economic Nationalism: Reality or Rhetoric? Ian Sheldon AED Economics Ohio State University. AAII Columbus Chapter November 8, 2017

CETA s Legal and Political Implications for the TTIP. David A. Gantz Samuel M. Fegtly Professor

Elephants in a bazaar?

ENHANCING TRADE AND INVESTMENT, SUPPORTING JOBS, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: OUTLINES OF THE TRANS-PACIFIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

Sensitive Sectors in Free Trade Agreements

Services Trade: Essential Fuel for U.S. and Global Economic Growth

Reviewing the Importance. for Indonesia

Statement to the Senate Standing Committee on Agriculture and Forestry

AdvantageBC. September 19, Don Campbell

Regional Economic Integration of the Republic of Moldova: Opportunities and Challenges

Case Studies from WTO Chair Holders

The Rise Of Regionalism In The Multilateral System And Features Of Preferential Trade Agreements In Asia And The Pacific

INCEPTION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. A. Context, Subsidiarity Check and Objectives

Position Paper. Rules of Origin in TTIP

Ask the Expert Brexit and the future of UK Trade

Trade Policy. U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Plan

AQA Economics A-level

TPP11 Agreement in Principle: Japan s Role in Mega-regional Trade Agreements

The significance of RoO in international trade

Trade Policy. U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Plan

Trade Note May 29, 2003

ARTNeT- GIZ Capacity Building Workshop January 2017, Bangkok Session 1: Things to know before doing impact assessment of FTAs

Intellectual Property-Related Preferential Trade Agreements and the Composition of Trade

Economic Integration in South East Asia and the Impact on the EU

Introduction. Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, published last fall, gained insights from the relevant academic and policy

How to Free Trade: Regional Trade Agreements

SINGAPORE AND COSTA RICA SIGN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT

Overview of EDC & CETA Opportunities. Klaus Houben, Regional Director Europe, Russian Federation and CIS The Hague, December 6, 2016

What Multinational Businesses Need to Know About the Future... Trade OVERVIEW PEOPLE & ORGANIZATIONS 5/19/16, 1:27 PM

Protectionist Responses to the Crisis: Damage Observed in Product-Level Trade

Countries, firms and global value chains.

Trade Policy Outlook for 2014 The EU Dimension

FREE TRADE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EFTA STATES AND MEXICO

The Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement

SFIA Legal Task Force Series: Updates on Changing International Trade Landscape Webinar

Chapter 20: The Future of NAFTA: A Policy Perspective

Updating NAFTA: Implications of the Trans-Pacific and Trans-Atlantic Partnerships

The Dangers of Sensi/ve Sectors in FTAs

1of 23. Learning Objectives

Rue the ROOs: Rules of Origin and the Gains (or Losses) from Trade Agreements

Analysis of trade..., Tri Kurnia Septiawan, FE UI, 2010.

PROMOTING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN TRADE NEGOTIATIONS: AN ACTION PLAN FOR CAMBODIA

EU-US FOREIGN POLICY RELATIONS

Pre-Hearing Statement of Linda M. Dempsey, Vice President, International Economic Affairs, National Association of Manufacturers

Plurilateralism: A New Way of Trade Liberalism?

The European debate on TTIP and global impacts of free

NAFTA and Its Renegotiation

Study Questions. Lecture 1 Overview of the World Economy

2019 USCIB Trade and Investment Agenda

Case study 1. Shattering. the Myths. About U.S. Trade Policy. The Impact of Free Trade Agreements in the US

Alternative methodologies to assess the growth effects of economic integration: CGE vs. gravity model cum Melitz

E15 The Initiative. Will the WTO have Functional Value in the Mega-regional World of FTAs? Andrew L. Stoler. December 2013

Comments in Response to Executive Order Regarding Trade Agreements Violations and Abuses Docket No. USTR

Draft. LightingEurope Position on the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

N Gage Trade Report Quarter 3, 2016

Expanding Trade and Investment in South Eastern Europe Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Brussels April 2007

Donald Trump s Trade Policies

Preferential Trade Agreements. Pravin Krishna Johns Hopkins University

Micro International Trade Essentials 2 WCC Supply, Demand, and Trade

Economy Report: Korea

Future of the Trading System. Robert Z. Lawrence

Trade in New England. Export-Supported U.S. Jobs (2014) Merchandise Exports (2015)

June 12, To: Members of the California Congressional Delegation. From: (Mrs.) Susanne Stirling, Vice President-International Affairs

Economic Impact of Canada s Participation in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership

USCIB Trade and Investment Agenda 2018

European Union Centre of Excellence Policy Briefs University of Alberta. Number 1, 2014

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Committee on Rules of Origin: Cumulation (Paragraph 1.7 of the Decision)

Plurilateral Agreements: A viable alternative to the WTO? March 11, 2013 Michitaka NAKATOMI Special Advisor, JETRO Consulting Fellow, RIETI

CONTENTS. Topic At A Glance A free trade area with the EU: what does it mean for Georgia? 4

Brexit: market access issues

Re: Consulting Canadians on a possible Canada-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement

EU-SOUTH KOREA F.T.A.

Dr. Nikolaos Theodorakis - Lecturer and Fellow, University of Oxford

Study Questions. Lecture 1 Overview of the World Economy

Will the World Choke on Spaghetti? Free Trade Agreements, AEUFTA and the Future of International Trade

Insights from ECA-CII Report on India-Africa Trade and Investment Relationship

A New Challenge to Canada s European Trade Ambitions October 2017

Sofia Maragkidou Phd student Department of International and European Studies, University of Macedonia, Greece

Navigating the Trans- Pacific Partnership

Canada Gazette, 12 April 2003; volume 137, no. 15

Potential Effects of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on the Philippine Economy*

Regional Harmonization of Preferential Rules of Origin in Asia: In search of a minimum common denominator

Increasing Productivity and Competitiveness through Trade (EU-Japan FTA/EPA, TPP) June 2014 Jun ARIMA Director General, JETRO London

CEFTA SECRETARIAT WORK PROGRAMME

CFRED The Trans Pacific Partnership Impact and Implications. Assessing the content from a business perspective

Need More Multilateral Efforts on Facilitating FDI Flow. Zhang Yunling Professor, Director International Studies, CASS

Transcription:

Trade Implications of the EU- TTIP for Neighboring Countries Alan V. Deardorff University of Michigan For presentation at Stanford February 20, 2014 www.fordschool.umich.edu

The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Currently being negotiated between the European Union and the United States Likely to include: Free trade agreement (FTA) Removal of behind the border barriers to trade and investment www.fordschool.umich.edu 2

www.fordschool.umich.edu 3

My focus here: Trade effects on neighboring countries Many of these have FTAs with the EU and/or the How will TTIP enhance or undermine the benefits to them of these arrangements? www.fordschool.umich.edu 4

www.fordschool.umich.edu 5

The neighbors are small, and most are very small They will matter little, economically to the EU and But they could be important politically www.fordschool.umich.edu 6

N. Amer 10% Barcelona Proc 4% E. Eur CEFTA 4% 0% EFTA 2% Figure 3 Shares of GDP (@PPP, 2012) for EU,, & Neighbor Groups EU 39% 41% www.fordschool.umich.edu 7

My Issue: How will TTIP affect the trade of its Neighbors? Why this is of interest: TTIP is large, both geographically and economically TTIP overlaps with NAFTA and other FTAs It s true (and important!) that TTIP will extend well beyond trade and trade barriers (tariffs & NTBs) to include many other issues Some trade related Some domestic www.fordschool.umich.edu 8

My Issue: How will TTIP affect the trade of its Neighbors? But I will focus on trade and on explicit trade barriers such as tariffs? Why? These are probably least important for the EU ad themselves, as their tariffs are already low But they are most important for the neighbors, who will be little affected by things like harmonization of regulations between EU and www.fordschool.umich.edu 9

Description of TTIP Outline Overlaps of TTIP with other FTAs Major trading partners of TTIP and its neighbors Effects of TTIP on neighbors by economy www.fordschool.umich.edu 10

TTIP Free Trade Area (FTA) Zero tariffs on all goods and services trade between EU and No change in tariffs on imports from outside; thus mostly unequal tariffs Rules of Origin (ROOs) www.fordschool.umich.edu 11

TTIP Areas that TTIP is set to cover market access for agricultural and industrial goods, government procurement, investment, energy and raw materials, regulatory issues, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, services, Most important for EU & www.fordschool.umich.edu 12

TTIP and more: intellectual property rights, sustainable development, small- and medium-sized enterprises, dispute settlement, competition, customs/trade facilitation, state-owned enterprises. www.fordschool.umich.edu 13

Overlap of TPP with AFTA and other FTAs TTIP overlap EU FTAs with EFTA (& European Economic Area on services) FTAs with members of the Barcelona Process (N. Africa & Middle East) Several FTAs with members of CEFTA (Central Europe Free Trade Area) NAFTA (North American Free Trade Area) FTAs with several (not all) of Barcelona Process www.fordschool.umich.edu 14

E = Economic Integration Agreement f = FTA C = Customs Union Figure 4: Existing FTAs & EIAs www.fordschool.umich.edu 15

Overlap of TTIP with other FTAs Messages: EU and are already heavily linked to their neighbors by existing FTAs: Most are both FTAs and Economic Integration Agreements (EIAs) on services. Of 26 countries and country groups that I ve selected as neighbors EU has FTA or EIA with all but 6 has FTA or EIA with 7 www.fordschool.umich.edu 16

Overlap of TTIP with other FTAs The Message: TTIP should not be understood in the same way that both the original EU and NAFTA were understood, as arrangements among countries that had no other prior arrangements TTIP is integration between countries that are already heavily integrated with others www.fordschool.umich.edu 17

Trade Effects of TTIP I ll focus mainly on the largest trade flows Top-five partners for exports Top-five partners for imports www.fordschool.umich.edu 18

Exports from row to column Figure 5 Top Five Destinations for Exports for EU,, and Neighboring Economies www.fordschool.umich.edu 19

Imports to row from column Figure 6 Top Five Origins for Imports for EU,, and Neighboring Economies www.fordschool.umich.edu 20

Trade Effects of TTIP Three main effects Trade creation: Import from partner what was previously produced at home Trade diversion: Import from partner what was previously imported from 3 rd country Reversal of trade diversion: Import from new partner what had been diverted to partner in prior FTA ( trade un-diversion? trade reversion? counter trade diversion?) www.fordschool.umich.edu 21

Trade Effects of FTAs Trade Creation: Import from partner what you previously produced yourself Beneficial to partner, which exports Beneficial to importing country as a whole But harmful to import-competing industry in importing country www.fordschool.umich.edu 22

Trade Effects of FTAs Trade Diversion: Import from partner what you previously imported from an outside country Harmful to outside country Harmless to import-competing industry in importing country (there is none) Harmful to importing country as whole, as it pays more for imports Beneficial to the partner exporting country www.fordschool.umich.edu 23

B A D C www.fordschool.umich.edu

(Sample Countries) (EU) B () A D () C () www.fordschool.umich.edu

Trade Diversion Hurts A Helps C Hurts B (!) B A D C www.fordschool.umich.edu

Trade Effects of FTAs Additional effect if a member already has an FTA with an outside country: Reversal of trade diversion: Imports that were diverted from the new partner by the 1 st FTA revert to the new partner with the 2 nd FTA This is a form of trade diversion Harmful to the country diverted from (which had benefited from 1 st FTA s trade diversion) But beneficial to the importing country it gets back to cheap imports www.fordschool.umich.edu 27

B A D C www.fordschool.umich.edu

Reversal of Trade Diversion Helps A Hurts C Helps B (TTIP) B A D More Trade Diversion Helps B Hurts A Hurts C (&D) www.fordschool.umich.edu C

Trade Effects of TTIP I now work through the trade effects on individual countries and groups of countries Discussion is based on the presence and absence of FTAs in Figure 4 covering the major trade flows indicated in Figures 5 & 6 www.fordschool.umich.edu 30

EFTA Countries:,, EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 31

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E EFTA Countries:,, (above) is typical These countries share an EIA among themselves and at least FTAs with the EU, but not with They have the EU as their major export destination and import origin They also trade significantly with the www.fordschool.umich.edu 32

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E EFTA Countries:,, They do not trade significantly with any of the other TTIP neighbors and do trade significantly with and, exports to and imports from www.fordschool.umich.edu 33

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E EFTA Countries:,, Their FTAs with the EU will have caused some trade diversion away from the. This will be reversed by TTIP That is economically beneficial for EU But painful for industries in EFTA that exported to EU only because of the trade preference vis a vis the They also suffer from conventional trade diversion: Their exports to must now compete with tariff-free exports of the EU www.fordschool.umich.edu 34

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E EFTA Countries:,, Conclusion: EFTA countries lose from TTIP www.fordschool.umich.edu 35

CEFTA Countries 5 of them have FTAs with the EU:, Bosnia & Herzegovina,,, 2 do not: I ll look at the two groups separately www.fordschool.umich.edu 36

CEFTA Countries:, Bosnia & Herzegovina,,, EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f E Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 37

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f CEFTA Countries (5 of them):, Bosnia & Herzegovina,,, (above) is typical These countries share an FTA among themselves and at least FTAs with the EU, but not with They have the EU as their major export destination and import origin They do not trade significantly with the www.fordschool.umich.edu 38

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f CEFTA Countries (5 of them):, Bosnia & Herzegovina,,, Some trade significantly with others in the group, as well as with. But they don t trade much with other TTIP neighbors. They do trade significantly with and some of them import significantly from www.fordschool.umich.edu 39

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f CEFTA Countries (5 of them):, Bosnia & Herzegovina,,, Because of their FTAs with the EU and not with the, the effects of TTIP on them will be similar to those on the EFTA countries, discussed above. Conclusion: They will be hurt by TTIP www.fordschool.umich.edu 40

CEFTA Countries:, EU Exports Imports FTAs f f f f f f I don t have trade data for. EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 41

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f CEFTA Countries (2 of them):, (I don t have trade data for ) These two countries have FTA only with the other CEFTA countries, but not with EU or Their trade (at least that of ) is largest with the EU, but significant also with E. Europe and As complete outsiders of TTIP who depend greatly on trade with the EU, they will lose due to trade diversion. www.fordschool.umich.edu 42

Eastern Europe:,, EU Exports E e e Imports m m m M m FTAs f EU Exports E e Imports M m m m FTAs C f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f EU Exports e e e E Imports m m m M m FTAs E E E f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 43

EU Exports E e e Imports m m m M m FTAs f Eastern Europe:, These two countries export significantly to the EU and import also from the. But their trade otherwise is with each other and with They are in hardly any FTAs As outsiders to TTIP with export interest in the EU, they will lose from trade diversion www.fordschool.umich.edu 44

EU Exports E e Imports M m m m FTAs C f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f is a very special case, as it has a customs union with the EU and therefore, of necessity, shares the EU s FTAs With its EU customs union, shares the EU s external tariffs, which presumably will include its zero tariffs on imports from the under TTIP But is not, currently, a party to the TTIP negotiations and therefore will not benefit from reduced tariffs on its exports www.fordschool.umich.edu 45

EU Exports E e Imports M m m m FTAs C f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f will Gain from reversal of its own trade diversion favoring the EU Lose from reversal of the EU s trade diversion favoring Since its exporters will continue to face tariffs, it will also lose from new trade diversion, as the buys from the EU instead of from Conclusion: is most likely to lose from TTIP It could gain if it were included as part of it. www.fordschool.umich.edu 46

Barcelona Process Countries: All have FTAs with the EU 5 have no trade agreement with the,,,, 3 do have either FTA or EIA with :,, (I m ignoring the West Bank & Gaza, for which I have no trade data) I ll look at the two groups separately www.fordschool.umich.edu 47

Barcelona Process Countries:,,,, EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f Exports e E Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 48

EU Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f,,,, (above) is somewhat representative of these 5 countries They have FTAs with the EU but not with the They trade most with the EU, but also significantly with the Like others considered above, they stand to lose from TTIP due to trade diversion www.fordschool.umich.edu 49

Barcelona Process Countries:,, EU Exports e E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f EU Exports e E e Imports M m m m FTAs f E f f f f f f f f f f EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f E f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 50

EU Exports e E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f,, and These are unique among the countries considered so far, in that they have FTAs with both the EU and To the extent that their significant exports to both were diverted from direct EU- trade, this advantage will be lost with TTIP They stand to lose more than most www.fordschool.umich.edu 51

The NAFTA Countries EU Exports e E e e e Imports m M m m m FTAs E f f f f f E EU Exports e E e e Imports m M m m FTAs E E E E E f E E www.fordschool.umich.edu 52

EU Exports e E e e Imports m M m m FTAs E E E E E f E E and The only notable difference between these two is the absence of an FTA between the EU and, and this has now been announced Thus, like, etc. above, these countries have FTAs with both the EU and the, and they stand to lose when those gain equally preferential access to the other. www.fordschool.umich.edu 53

A Final Word on Rules of Origin FTAs (unlike customs unions) necessarily have rules of origin With a complex web of FTAs, expanding with TTIP, an important issue is cumulation of ROOs Do imported inputs from third countries count as originating within the FTA? www.fordschool.umich.edu 54

A Final Word on Rules of Origin The favors bilateral cumulation, under which the answer is NO. This limits the extent to which the FTA liberalizes trade, since much trade may still be subject to tariffs Worse, firms may switch to higher cost inputs within the FTA in order to qualify under the ROO This can mean that a web of FTAs can be worse than none www.fordschool.umich.edu 55

A Final Word on Rules of Origin The EU uses diagonal cumulation for the countries of the Barcelona Process. Thus products assembled in, say, with inputs from, say, will still qualify for tariff-free entry into the EU Were this extended to all of the EU and FTA partners, the effects of TTIP would be better all around. www.fordschool.umich.edu 56

Conclusion Trade effects of TTIP on the neighbor economies will be mostly that they lose from either New trade diversion, or Reversal of previous trade diversion that was in their favor www.fordschool.umich.edu 57

Appendix: Country Data www.fordschool.umich.edu 58

EU Exports EU E e e e e Imports EU m m m m M FTAs EU E E E f E f E E E f f f f f f f f f E E E www.fordschool.umich.edu 59

EU Exports e E e e e Imports m m m M m FTAs E f E E f E E E www.fordschool.umich.edu 60

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 61

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 62

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f E E f f f f f E f f f f f f f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 63

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 64

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 65

EU Exports Imports FTAs f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 66

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 67

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 68

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f E Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 69

EU Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e e Imports M m m m FTAs E f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 70

EU Exports E e e Imports m m m M m FTAs f www.fordschool.umich.edu 71

EU Exports E e Imports M m m m FTAs C f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 72

EU Exports e e e E Imports m m m M m FTAs E E E f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 73

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f www.fordschool.umich.edu 74

EU Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 75

EU Exports e E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 76

EU Exports e E e Imports M m m m FTAs f E f f f f f f f f f f Exports e E e Imports M m m m FTAs f E f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 77

EU Exports e E Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f Exports e E Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 78

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f E f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m FTAs f E f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 79

EU Exports Imports FTAs f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 80

EU Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f Exports E e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 81

EU Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f Exports E e e e Imports M m m m m FTAs f f f f f f f f f f www.fordschool.umich.edu 82

EU Exports e E e e e Imports m M m m m FTAs E f f f f f E www.fordschool.umich.edu 83

EU Exports e E e e Imports m M m m FTAs E E E E E f E E www.fordschool.umich.edu 84

EU Exports e E Imports m M FTAs E www.fordschool.umich.edu 85

EU Exports e E Imports m M FTAs E E E www.fordschool.umich.edu 86

www.fordschool.umich.edu 87