Colorado Department of Human Services

Similar documents
President Trump s 2019 Budget Proposal

Federal Reauthorization of Welfare Reform

The Governor s Recommended Budget for the Department of Health and Human Services

Senator Jack Hill, Chairman. Senate Appropriations Committee

DENVER HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET REVIEW SEPTEMBER 24, BUDGET

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2010 As Submitted December 1, 2009

Previously enacted budget reductions have resulted in steep reductions across the Department s programs and operations.

Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise: Colorado

Percentage of Cases by Federal Poverty Level

TANF at 20. Susan Golonka, Acting Director Office of Family Assistance. National Governor s Association Kansas City, MO June 28, 2016

Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG): Brief Introduction

This page is intentionally left blank.

Welfare Reform in the USA. Frank Fuentes Deputy Director, ACYF Administration for Children and Families

November 2017 Special Legislative Session. Denise Williams, Executive Director MASBO Executive Director (406)

Federal Policy & Budget Update Mercedes González

COLORADO GENERAL ASSEMBLY JOINT BUDGET COMMITTEE FY STAFF FIGURE SETTING OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

Health and Human Services Subcommittee Fiscal Year Budget Highlights

SOCIAL SERVICES SOURCE OF FUNDS. USE OF FUNDS Other Financing Uses 1% STAFFING TREND. Budget & Staffing Operating Capital FTEs

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING The State of Colorado Department of Human Services

Democrat Budget Proposal: All Solutions

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 372

Frozen at $16.5 billion through FY pregnancy reduction and twoparent. need to be targeted to lowincome

FY State Budget Summary Analysis

Nevada Department of Health and Human Services and the Division of Health Care Financing and Policy Medicaid Opt Out White Paper January 22, 2010

Fiscal Overview of Child Welfare Privatization in Nebraska. Legislative Fiscal Office October 18, 2011

Florida Medicaid Prescribed Drug Service Spending Control Initiatives. For the Quarter April 1, 2016 through June 30, 2016

Welfare and Child Care Reauthorization 2003: Options and Opportunities. June 1, 2003

Strengthening the UI Safety Net With $8 Billion in New Federal Reed Act Funding: State Findings & Recommendations

An Initial Look at Missouri s State Budget for Fiscal Year 2019

Administrative Directive

Summary of New York State Enacted Budget

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Eligibility

Department of Human Assistance

Seventy-Eighth Oregon Legislative Assembly Regular Session

5180 Department of Social Services

Presentation to the Actuaries Club of the Southwest

Sub. S.B. 319 L

Florida Medicaid Prescribed Drug Service Spending Control Initiatives

Boulder County Human Services Board Packet January 31, 2019 Meeting Packet

CalWORKs. Program and Budget History

JBC staffer, Eric Kurtz, provided an overview of the HCPF budget, noting a few key points and tables/charts:

The President's Budget The story of $3.7 trillion

Department of Social Services

Florida Medicaid Prescribed Drug Service Spending Control Initiatives. For the Quarter July 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016

By Mark Greenberg January 30, The TANF Participation Rate Structure under the Budget Reconciliation Bill: A Summary of the Rules

2021 Budget: An Opportunity to Get Montana Back on Track and Rebuild Public Investments

Changes in TANF Work Requirements Could Make Them More Effective in Promoting Employment

SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES CLOSING REPORT

New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute 1

Local Commissioners Memorandum

Florida Medicaid Prescribed Drug Service Spending Control Initiatives. For the Quarter October 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017

Analysis Item 39: Department of Justice Division of Child Support

MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR REGARDING VETO OF HOUSE BILL 2044

Key State TANF Policies Affecting Microenterprise. California

Contact Anita Neumann, Senate Family and Early Childhood Education Fiscal Analyst at 651/ or at

New York s New Budget: More Pain Than Gain for Health and Human Services

Executive Summary. Fiscal Year ($ millions) Total Department Uses by Major Service Area 2, ,

CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

THE SEQUESTER: MECHANICS AND IMPACT

AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 SUMMARY - MEDICAID PROVISIONS

Section II. Statewide Overview

BUDGET WORKSHOP

Integrating TANF and WIA Into a Single Workforce System: An Analysis of Legal Issues

At Risk Youth & Family Services; $8,606,672; 10% Public Health; $4,161,572; 5% Social Services; $30,463,550; 36% STRATEGIC PLAN OUTCOMES

State & National Issues Affecting Health Care in the 81 st Legislative Session

Los Gatos Union School District Proposed Budget and Multi-year Projection. Narrative

History of Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD) Medicaid Waiver Funding

Key Policy Issues for the. Next Phase of Welfare Reform

Medicaid Prescribed Drug Program Spending Control Initiatives. For the Quarter April 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014

July 27, 2018 Emergency Board Meeting Report on Medicaid for Fiscal Year 2018

Medicaid Impact Conference Session 2011

This report has been updated to reflect new data. Two Sequestrations: How the Pending Automatic Budget Cuts Would Work.

State Cost (Savings) Biennium Biennium

F I S C A L P O L I C Y I N S T I T U T E

CHANGE REQUEST for FY BUDGET REQUEST CYCLE

Child Support Provisions in the Deficit Reduction Act

Judicial Branch Administration Schedule 4 - Source of Funding

House Finance Committee December 6, 2016

KY Department for Community Based Services. Order of Presentation. Child Care Assistance Program

Why TANF Is Not a Model for Other Safety Net Programs

CHENANGO COUNTY TENTATIVE BUDGET Preliminary Budget For Board Review

Chapter 4 Medicaid Clients

2013 Federal Budget Sequestration and Potential Local Impact. November 27, 2012

WHAT S IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2013 BUDGET FOR TANF?

TAXES ARE A CHILDREN S ISSUE

1 SUPREME COURT 2 3 Supreme Court Operations GF 69,517 34,866 34,866 69,732 34,866 34,866 69,732 34,866 34,866 69,732

Human Services Agency

Key Budget Policy Choices

Behavioral Health Services Revenue Maximization Plan

Department of Social Services

Joint Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services - Status Update on Legislative Budget Items Session. 3,834,275 9,394,658 Yes N/A

Billions More in General Revenue Needed for

WorkFirst NJ. Quarterly Progress Update March 2017 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION OF FAMILY DEVELOPMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY

November 14, San Jacinto, 4th Floor 1100 San Jacinto, 4th Floor Austin, Texas Austin, Texas 78701

VHPD HMIS DATA: PROGRAM EXIT FORM

Return on Investment Report PROGRAM YEAR 2005 JULY 1, 2005 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006

San Francisco Budget Overview

CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT EXPLANATION Sub. For SB 249 As Agreed to April 30, 2016

Fact Sheet: Impact of the President s FY 2019 Budget Request on Children s Health

Transcription:

Colorado Department of Human Services FINANCIAL WEBINAR STATE BUDGET, TANF AND BUDGET CONTROL ACT APRIL 11, 2012

STATE BUDGET 2

Budget Update Revenue March 2012 General Fund revenue for the next budget year (FY 2012-13) is projected to grow at rate higher than projected in December (3.0 percent compared with 1.1 percent). The 3.0 percent rate translates to $220.7 million in revenue growth in FY 2012-13. With the upgrade to the forecast, General Fund revenue is now projected to be $164.5 million or 2.2 percent higher next year than was forecast in December 2011. The increase is mainly attributable to a projected higher rate of revenue growth from individual income tax collected from estimated payments. 3

Budget Update Revenue March 2012 General Fund Revenue - Actual & Forecast $8.0 $7.5 $7.0 $6.5 $6.0 $5.5 $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $6.6 $5.6 $5.5 $5.8 $6.2 $7.0 $7.5 $7.7 $6.7 $6.5 $7.1 $7.4 Forecast $7.6 4

Budget Update Human Services Department s Share of Statewide General Fund FY 2011-12 8.8% Human Services Rest of State 91.2% 5

Budget Update Human Services Department Funding Sources FY 2011-12 29.8% GF 32.5% FF Federal Funds (FF) Reappropriated Funds (RF) Cash Funds (CF) General Funds (GF) 15.9% CF 21.8% RF 6

Budget Update Human Services Dept. of Human Services Overview FTE History 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 5,163.3 4,930.7 4,870.9 4,866.3 09-10 Actual 10-11 Actual 11-12 Approp 12-13 Est. Note: 12-13 FTE amounts are estimates currently in HB 12-1335. 7

Budget Update Human Services Category GF CF RF FF Total Net GF FTE FY 11-12 Approp. $614.7 $328.0 $449.8 $669.0 $2,061.5 $827.5 4,870.9 FY 12-13 (HB 12-1335) $637.6 $330.7 $465.7 $614.9 $2,048.9 $858.0 4,866.3 Increase/Decrease $23.2 $2.7 $15.9 ($54.1) ($12.6) $30.5 (4.6) Percent Change 3.8% 0.8% 3.5% (8.0%) (0.6%) 3.7% (0.09%) Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 8

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes FY 2011-12 (Current Year) Child Care Assistance Program - Joint Budget Committee (JBC) staff initiated action to reduce of $0.6 million General Fund to the Child Care Assistance Program due to projected underutilization of the Child Care appropriation. This action will result in an adjustment to the CCAP allocation in the current fiscal year. Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 9

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 General Department Wide Impacts A 1% personal services reduction was applied to all appropriations containing more than 20.0 FTE. The reduction was NOT applied to 24/7 direct care facilities such as the Regional Centers, Mental Health Institutes, and the Youth Corrections facilities. Per the Executive budget request, the 2.5% employee PERA contribution was eliminated, and the 5% operating reduction taken in FY 2010-11 was reversed. Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 10

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 Child Welfare $12.5 million in General Fund was restored to Child Welfare. This action reduced the prior year General Fund refinance of TANF dollars from the $23.5 million level. An additional $5 million in TANF dollars was removed from Child Welfare and replaced (one-time) with federal Social Services Block Grant (Title XX) funding. This action further reduced the remaining TANF in Child Welfare to $6.0 million for FY 2012-13. Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 11

Millions Budget Update Human Services Child Welfare Expenditure Data $400 $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $- SFY 2006-07 SFY 2007-08 SFY 2008-09 SFY 2009-SFY 2010-10 11 OOH Program Services Adoption Subsidy Total Source: 2011 Data Book Colorado Department of Human Services, Division of Child Welfare Services 12

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 Child Care Child Care Assistance Program - Refinancing of $0.5 million General Fund with federal Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) moneys. Federal grant amounts have increased beyond current appropriations. NO CHANGE IN THE FUNDING LEVEL FROM FY2011-12 TO FY 2012-13. Static at $73.9 million level. $0.5 million federal funds provided for upgrades to the provider portal in the Child Care Automated Tracking System (CHATS). Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 13

Millions Budget Update Human Services $100 $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $- Child Care Assistance Expenditure & Allocation Data FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Est. Allocation Expenditures 14

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 Low Income Energy Assistance Reduction of $13.3 million cash and federal funds for the Low Income Energy Assistance Program (LEAP), based on funds anticipated being available. The reduction includes a reduction of $12.2 million in federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance block grant funds and a reduction of $1.1 million in cash funds to adjust for anticipated Severance Tax revenue. This reduction is in addition to the TANF funding reduction to be discussed later in the presentation. Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 15

Millions Budget Update Human Services $90 $80 $70 $60 $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $- Low Income Energy Assistance Expenditure History & Estimates Estimates HHS - Office of Energy Assistance Block Grant TANF-ARRA TANF Energy Outreach Colorado Severance Tax 16

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 Mental Health Institutes $3,224,551 General Fund and 10.5 FTE increase for the Colorado Mental Health Institutes to fund additional staffing to attain a 1.35 direct care staff to patient ratio and offset pharmaceutical price increases. Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 17

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 Services for People with Disabilities Increase in funding and slots for various Medicaid waiver programs: Increase of $6.5 million for Adult Comprehensive Services for 46 new resources for children transitioning out of foster care, and 47 emergency resources. Increase of $2.4 million for Adult Supported Living Services to cover 50 new resources for children aging out of Children s Extensive Support Services program. Increase of $1.1 million for Case Management to support additional resources. Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 18

Budget Update Human Services Proposed Budget Changes in HB 12-1335 FY 2012-13 Youth Corrections Increase of $3.6 million total funds for the Division of Youth Corrections, budget changes including but not limited to the items below: an increase due to capacity realignment resulting in more youth in community placements ($2.7 million), an increase due to the forecasted number of committed youth ($0.8 million), and an increase to reduce state facility use from 110 percent of capacity to 100 percent of capacity ($2.7 million). Note: House Bill 12-1335 has been introduced, but is not final. As a result, all numbers cited for HB 12-1335 are subject to possible change. 19

TANF SOLVENCY Where We Are and How We Got Here 20

TANF Proposed Budget Colorado Works Block Grant (Fed and State) Colorado Works MOE Reimbursements (explained on subsequent slide) FY 2011-12 FY 11-12 Restriction /Reduction FY 2012-13 $129,297,496 ($514,778) $128,782,718 5,524,726 (5,524,726) -0- Colorado Block Grant Support Fund 1,000,000 (1,000,000) -0- Colorado Works Program Admin (incl. 1% cut in FY 2012-13) 1,549,410 (70,000) 1,507,7454 Colorado Works County Training 586,297 (55,000) 472,297 Domestic Abuse Program 657,670 (30,000) 627,677 Workforce Development Council 105,007-0- 85,000 Low Income Energy Assistance Program 1,500,000 (1,500,000) -0- Refugee Assistance 2,805,334 (100,000) 2,705,334 Child Welfare Programs (explained on subsequent slide) $23,500,000-0- 6,000,000 21

Colorado Works Block Grant FY 2011-12 $514,778 restriction Revised allocations are in monthly allocation status reports Revised allocations include the commensurate reduction in County MOE ($91,279), retaining the 85:15 ratio of federal to county funding mix. FY 2012-13 No further reductions beyond the level of restrictions already in place in FY 2011-12. Works Allocation Committee has not yet set the allocations for FY 2012-13. 22

Colorado Works MOE Reimbursement Triggered when the state meets the Work Participation Rate (WPR) WPR is met through county efforts, as well as due to the caseload reduction credits earned through a reduction in caseload, and spending more countable Maintenance of Effort expenditures than required. Historically, when the state met the WPR, the state issued payments to the counties, collectively equal to roughly $5.5 million, based on an allocation set by the Works Allocation Committee. Effective this fiscal year, rather than the state issuing a payment to the county in the year its notified of having met the WPR, the state will instead reduce the counties MOE requirement in the following year. The effects of this will be two-fold: 1. Counties allocations will, collectively, appear to be lower by $5.5 million, represented by the reduction in required local spending, or MOE. 2. The historical ratio of Federal to Local spending will change from a ratio 85:15 to 88:12, in those years following when the state meets the WPR. County departments will have more flexibility on where the funds will be expended within their county human services fund. Targeted Allocation statute (26-2-714(6) CRS) retains funds in the County Social Services fund. 23

TANF Funds In Child Welfare Programs Federal TANF funds were appropriated to Child Welfare and Core Services to address state general fund revenue shortfalls. The total amounts appropriated were $12.5 million in Fiscal Year 2009-10; $19.5 million in Fiscal Year 2010-11, and $23.5 million in FY 2011-12. The Governor s FY 2012-13 budget included a partial reversal of these budget actions, reducing by $12 million the amount of TANF being appropriated to the Child Welfare Programs, and restoring an equal amount of General Fund to the programs, effectively keeping the Child Welfare Programs overall appropriation levels intact. The Joint Budget Committee supported this backfilling of TANF with general fund. Additionally, the Joint Budget Committee appropriated $5 million in unobligated Title XX Social Services Block Grant Funds to Child Welfare Programs, and further reduced a like amount of TANF to be appropriated to Child Welfare Programs. The use of Title XX is a one-time patch that is not expected to be available in subsequent years. Finally, the Joint Budget Committee stated its intent to increase by $11 million the amount of General Fund to be appropriated to Child Welfare Programs in FY 2013-14, at which point there will no longer be any TANF funds directly appropriated to Child Welfare. 24

TANF Supplemental Grant Awards The States Basic TANF Block Grant and MOE levels were set in 1996, based on pre- 1996 state spending, and are not adjusted for changes in state s economic or demographic circumstances. In the legislative debates, this freeze was thought to be particularly disadvantageous to two sets of states: 1. Those with high rates of population growth; and 2. Those that paid relatively low benefit amounts under pre-1996 welfare programs. To address this, Congress provided Colorado and sixteen other states with supplemental grants. Colorado has received $13.6 million per year in supplemental funding since FY 2001, which augmented the basic $136 million annual TANF Block Grant. TANF Supplemental Grants were suspended in July 2011. The President's FY 2013 Budget proposes reinstating the Supplemental Grants with an offsetting reduction in the TANF Contingency Fund. 25

TANF Contingency Awards TANF Contingency Funds are made available to needy states, at their request, for periods when unfavorable economic conditions threaten their ability to operate their TANF programs. A state is a needy state if it meets either the unemployment trigger or the Food Stamp trigger for an eligible month, as defined in federal statute. For any eligible month, a state may receive up to one-twelfth of 20% of its annual TANF block grant. States are required to provide match for any Contingency funds received. Funds are awarded in chronological order to the receipt of the requests, until the available appropriated funds are exhausted. Colorado has received TANF Contingency funds at varying levels for a number of years, but is not guaranteed the receipt of any level of funding. In setting the annual appropriation of TANF funds, the state s historical practice has been to exclude any Contingency funds in its calculation. The SFY 2012-13 long bill assumes that the state will receive $6.8 million. 26

BUDGET CONTROL ACT 27

Background The Budget Control Act was signed into law August 2, 2011 The Act created the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, also known as the Super Committee The Super Committee was tasked with developing a plan to draft a proposal to reduce the national debt by an additional $1.5 trillion over ten years. Failing to reach agreement, provisions in the Act require that certain nonexempt mandated and discretionary programs be subject to sequestration, or automatic reductions. For certain programs, the reductions are progressive in nature, meaning that the program funding will be reduced in the first year, and further reduced each year thereafter, through FFY 2021. A number of Human Services programs are subject to the progressive sequestration. 28

Estimated Impacts to Major Programs (assuming a 7.5% annual sequestration rate) Child Care Title XX (in $ millions) Voc Rehab OOA Title III Sub Abuse LEAP FFY 12 $27.5 $27.7 $40.2 $15.8 $26.2 $38.1 FFY 13 25.5 25.6 37.2 14.6 24.2 35.3 FFY 14 23.6 23.7 34.4 13.5 22.4 32.6 FFY 15 21.8 21.9 31.8 12.5 20.7 30.2 FFY 16 20.2 20.3 29.4 11.6 19.2 27.9 FFY 17 18.6 18.7 27.2 10.7 17.7 25.8 FFY 18 17.2 17.3 25.2 9.9 16.4 23.9 FFY 19 15.9 16.0 23.3 9.1 15.2 22.1 FFY 20 14.8 14.8 21.6 8.5 14.0 20.4 FFY 21 13.6 13.7 19.9 7.8 13.0 18.9 29

What We re Hearing and from Whom U.S. Senate Sen. Reid has indicated that the Budget Control Act establishes the budget for FFY 2013 and that the Senate doesn t need to adopt a separate budget resolution U.S. House of Representatives Adopted a concurrent resolution that would relieve the defense budget from sequestration and shift the cost to non-defense items, including entitlements. Proposes block grants for SNAP and Medicaid, with work requirements. Simplifies tax code, creating two rates for individuals: 10% and 25% Budget resolution carries no force of law; serves as platform American Public Human Services Association (APHSA) Estimate 7.5 7.6% sequestration rate Are of the opinion that attempts will be made to change sequestration during lame duck session Changes to sequestration may not necessarily bode well for human services programs. Federal Agencies 30

How CDHS is Preparing BUDGET CONTROL ACT GRANT REDUCTION IMPACT STATEMENT GRANT NAME: FFY 2011-12 Actual Grant Amount: FFY 2012-13 Est. Reduction (per Projected Impacts Worksheet): SHORT GRANT DESCRIPTION: IMPACTS TO: 1) Service Delivery (i.e. Client Impact) (Y/N): If Yes, please describe: 2) FTE (Y/N): If Yes, please describe: 3) Contractors/Partner Agencies (e.g. counties, Community Centered Boards, Mental Health Centers, etc.) (Y/N): If Yes, please describe: 31

Will.Kugel@state.co.us Jay.Morein@state.co.us 32