BUSA presentation to NERSA on Eskom s RCA Application Multi Year Price Determination (MYPD3) Year 1 (2013/2014) 5 February 2016

Similar documents
Eskom 2018/19 Revenue Application

ESKOM RCA APPLICATION TO NERSA: MINING SECTOR RESPONSE

SALGA Position on Eskom Revenue Proposal 2018/19 Cllr M. Mfikoe Nhlanhla L Ngidi Lonwabo Magida 16 November 2017

Eskom Regulatory Clearing Account (RCA) year 5 of MYPD 3. Public Hearings- Port Elizabeth Date: 16 January 2019

NERSA Submissions ESKOM RCA

MYPD 3 (Year 2013/14) Regulatory Clearing Account Submission to NERSA

Eskom 2018/19 Revenue Application

Eskom Revenue Application. Multi-Year Price Determination (MYPD 4) FY2019/ /22

SOLUTION. [?]Adoption by all stakeholders of a vision document for the ESI

NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATOR. Eskom MYPD2 Regulatory Clearing Account (RCA) and RCA Balance THE DECISION

Eskom 2018/19 Revenue Application

MYPD3 Application January 2013

MYPD Methodology Eskom Response to Consultation Paper

ESKOM RCA Applications 2015/ / /18

EIUG Comment on Eskom s RCA Applications 2014/15, 2015/16, 2016/17

FY2017/18, Year 5 of MYPD 3 Period

Submission to SALGA and National Treasury

Eskom RCA: Revenue Application NERSA Public Hearing. City Power Presentation Frank Hinda 11 May 2018

NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATOR. Eskom s Regulatory Clearing Account (RCA) Application Third Multi-Year Price Determination (MYPD3) Year 1 (2013/14)

Energy and Climate Change Programme P O Box 106 Office Tel: (+27) (0) Fax:

Eskom Revenue Application. Multi Year Price Determination. 2010/11 to 2012/13 (MYPD 2)

ESKOM TARIFF APPLICATION TO NERSA: MINING SECTOR RESPONSE

MYPD3 Application Gauteng January 2013

Draft Eskom 2018/19 Revenue Application

A Rational Price Path for South Africa

ESKOM s applications for MYPD4 and MYPD3 RCA 2017/18

The South African Grid Code. Transmission Tariff Code. Version 9.0

RCAs submitted for FY2014/15, FY 2015/16 and FY 2016/17. NERSA Public Hearings 17 April 2018

PRESENTATION AT NERSA PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR ESKOM S MYPD3 RCA FOR YEAR 5 RONALD CHAUKE 14 JANUARY 2019

COSATU CONGRESS OF SOUTH AFRICAN TRADE UNIONS COSATU COMMENT ON ESKOM S MYPD3 FOR THE YEAR 2, 3, 4

Eskom Presentation Standing Committee on Appropriations

GUIDELINE DOCUMENT TO MUNICIPALITIES ON THE DESIGN OF A DOMESTIC INCLINING BLOCK RATE TARIFF

Demystifying Tariff Setting The tariff conundrum Lower rates now, blackouts later?

NERSA CONSULTATION PAPER: ESKOM MULTI-YEAR PRICE DETERMINATION METHODOLOGY

POST-CABINET MEDIA BRIEFING

NELSON MANDELA BAY BUSINESS CHAMBER

OUTA Presentation to NERSA Eskom s 2018/19 application NOVEMBER 2017

THE SOUTH AFRICAN ASSOCIATION OF FREIGHT FORWARDERS. Submission to the National Ports Regulator

MYPD 3 (Year 2014/15) Regulatory Clearing Account Submission to NERSA

NATIONAL ENERGY REGULATOR OF SOUTH AFRICA

SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL NO. 437

SOUTH AUSTRALIA VICTORIA (HEYWOOD) INTERCONNECTOR UPGRADE

Establishing the right price for electricity in South Africa. Brian Kantor with assistance from Andrew Kenny and Graham Barr

Irish Water 2019 Revenue Control

THE 2010/11 TARIFF ADJUSTMENT. Standard schedule of Tariffs

Challenges to the South African mining industry in the wake of Marikana and Mangaung

Registration application fee to be paid by Small-Scale Embedded Generator Applicants

Eskom s Draft Application to NERSA for Price. Increase in 2008/9

YPD 3: Regulatory Clearing Account Submission to NERSA

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Department of Energy South Africa

CHAMBER OF MINES PRESENTATION ON THE DRAFT CARBON TAX BILL

ANNEXURE 1. Consultation Paper

Comprehensive Review of BC Hydro: Phase 1 Final Report

Investor Presentation. Cover slide (same as IR cover)

Eskom 2018/19 Revenue Application. Closing remarks

Manitoba Hydro 2015 General Rate Application

ESKOM FINANCIALS SUMMARY REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY America s Three Deficits

CANADIAN MANUFACTURERS & EXPORTERS 2015 ONTARIO PRE-BUDGET SUBMISSION

Residential tariff increases and restructuring for MYPD3 explained. Brochure

ESKOM One Year Application 2018/19

Credit Opinion: Eskom Holdings SOC Limited

executive summary ExEcuTivE SuMMAry

Welfare Reform & Work Bill Parliamentary Briefing

Eskom MYPD4 Revenue Application

MPC update: The SARB cuts interest rates by 25bp as risks to inflation outlook seen to be reduced as SA avoids a Moody's rating downgrade

Portfolio Committee on Energy

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

SANCO FREE STATE PROVINCE

National Energy Guarantee Draft Detailed Design Consultation Paper

NERSA to consider public opinion on the ESKOM proposed revenue application multi-year price determination 2013/14 to 2017/18 (MYPD 3)

Care Quality Commission consultation on regulatory fees from April 2018: NHS Providers response

ESKOM S FINANCIAL CRISES AND CONTINUING TARIFF INCREASES

OUTA Presentation to NERSA Eskom s 2018/19 application NOVEMBER 2017

The Impact of Electricity Price Increases and Eskom s Six-Year Capital Investment Programme on the South African Economy

NEW ZEALAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING AGENCY

Generation investment in a liberalised electricity market. 28 March 2008

2012 Article IV Consultation with Spain Concluding Statement of IMF Mission Madrid, June, 14, 2012

Regulatory Impact Statement:

REGULATORY ACCOUNTS. The purpose of this evidence is to provide a description of Hydro One Transmission s Regulatory Accounts.

COMPANY OVERVIEW ABOUT PEC METERING. Background

Change Impact: Disruption and Loss of Productivity A Model for Securing Price and Schedule Adjustment

BEFORE THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DIRECT TESTIMONY RUTH M. SAKYA.

Overview of the framework

Total Tax Contribution 2009

PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON MINERAL RESOURCES:

Eskom RCA applications M o r n è M o s t e r t M a y

South African Reserve Bank STATEMENT OF THE MONETARY POLICY COMMITTEE. Issued by Lesetja Kganyago, Governor of the South African Reserve Bank

Investment Strategy Statement: September 2018

RESPONSE NERSA IN RESPECT OF ESKOM TARIFF APPLICATION

Complementary modernisation: Options to address the issue of affordability in the Energy White Paper

DETERMINATION OF LESOTHO ELECTRICITY COMPANY (Pty) Ltd s APPLICATION FOR A TARIFF INCREASE FOR 2012/13

Response by Power NI Energy (PPB)

Back to the Future: Henry, Cash Flows and Consumption. Greg Smith 2015

Submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Major Bank Levy Bill 2017

MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC AFFAIRS

NOTTINGHAM CITY HOMES. THE BOARD REPORT OF Ian Rabett Head of Health & Safety 26 November 2015

FINANCIAL PLANNING AND BUDGETING - CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND DEPARTMENTS

Stage 2 Cost Recovery Impact Statement. Customs and Excise Bill: Customs valuation rulings: Regulations for cost recovery charge

Transcription:

BUSA presentation to NERSA on Eskom s RCA Application Multi Year Price Determination (MYPD3) Year 1 (2013/2014) 5 February 2016 Martin Kingston Chair: BUSA Standing Committee on Economic & Trade Policy

BUSA submission BUSA would like to thank NERSA for this opportunity to present its views. BUSA has made a detailed submission to NERSA containing our views and recommendations. This presentation is a brief summary of our submission, in consideration of NERSA s timetable. The provision of more detailed information in the Eskom application would have enabled BUSA to present a more comprehensive submission. 2

BUSA BUSA is a confederation of business organisations including chambers of commerce and industry, professional associations, corporate associations and unisectorals. BUSA represents the views of its members in a number of national structures and bodies, both statutory and non-statutory. BUSA has encouraged its members to make their own specific submissions. The BUSA submission constitutes an overall business position. 3

Introduction BUSA has previously commented (November 2012) on the original MYPD3 application and raised the significant negative impacts on the economy of that application were it to be granted. BUSA has also undertaken further impact assessments as part of its review of the proposed Carbon Tax. The absence of a formally issued and up to date IRP is a fundamental challenge to an objective analysis of the energy needs of the country and associated pricing. Eskom s financial sustainability is inextricably linked to the financial well being of its customers, who require affordable electricity to remain viable. Eskom s customer base will be compromised if their viability is undermined by electricity which is not reliable, predictable and competitive. 4

Introduction (2) Approval of the MYPD3 RCA Application for 2013/2014 would result in a tariff significantly beyond that contemplated in the original application. Furthermore, it would render many businesses uncompetitive due to its unaffordability. BUSA is also concerned that the application was received so long after FY 2013/2014. BUSA recommends a shorter timeframe being imposed by NERSA for future applications. We have proceeded on the basis that where we have been unable to confirm the proposition from Eskom, because it has been inadequately substantiated, it should be disallowed. The remainder of this presentation will be in two parts: Part 1 deals with the methodology and underlying assumptions of the application. Part 2 deals with its potential economic impact. 5

Methodology and Assumptions (1): Price stability Eskom s rationale that a five-year decision on tariffs would lead to a smoother and predictable price path has not been achieved. This application would bring annual increases well above the original MYPD3 decision. No long term price certainty is being achieved. A review of the MYPD3 methodology should be considered to achieve that objective, as price certainty is a key requirement for business. 6

Methodology and Assumptions (2): Revenue variance The majority of the shortfall results from revenue variance, i.e. a material reduction from forecast. Much of this is due to economic growth being significantly less than was anticipated. There is no expectation that economic growth will pick up during the remainder of MYPD3. Electricity demand has regressed to 2007/8 levels, reflecting fewer business consumers. Consequently, customers will pay higher unit costs for electricity, leading to pressures on business and the prospect of further reduction in demand. This constitutes a vicious cycle that needs to be urgently arrested. Weak demand is likely to persist until 2018/19, resulting in similar variances in revenue and, therefore, the potential for ever increasing tariffs with this methodology. 7

Methodology and Assumptions (2): Revenue variance (continued) Revenue variance which is beyond Eskom s control should be allowed in respect of standard tariff customer sales. The revenue shortfall in respect of negotiated pricing agreement (NPA) sales is not sufficiently substantiated. The split between standard tariff, NPA and export customers needs to be reviewed to determine whether the below cost tariff of NPA customers should be permitted. The permitted variance may therefore require adjustment. Revenue losses due to load shedding should reflect that load shedding takes place during peak periods, and the calculations should reflect that accordingly. 8

Methodology and Assumptions (3): Primary Energy OCGT Fuel: Allowance for this in MYPD3 was premised on new generating capacity being in place. Greater use of OCGTs therefore resulted from operational inefficiencies and (as per MYPD2 RCA) this variance should not be allowed. Coal: Variances resulting from more expensive coal and coal handling as well as construction delays should not be considered prudent expenditure and should be disallowed accordingly. Oil & Gas: Costs attributable to construction delays and poor maintenance are not prudent expenditure, and should be excluded from RCA. Water treatment costs are not substantiated and should be excluded. 9

Methodology and Assumptions (4): Environmental Levy The adjustment in the application for the over-recovery of the levy is welcomed. However, this should not be included in allowable revenue. Inclusion of the levy in Eskom s published tariffs ignores the fact that this is a tax on customers that should be reflected separately. BUSA calls on NERSA to address this through: Adjudicating and publishing electricity prices without the levy; Ensuring adequate annual accounting of the funds collected with appropriate reconciliation of projected generation from non-renewable technology against actual on an annual basis; Requiring licensees to reflect the levy separately on customer invoices; and Ensuring separation between allowable revenue for the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity on the one hand and tax collection for the fiscus on the other. 10

Methodology and Assumptions (5): Expenditure MYPD3 requires expenditure to be incurred prudently. However, the application reveals that many of the costs claimed were incurred as a result of policy direction from the shareholder. The methodology makes no distinction between Eskom s operational decisions and those arising from interventions by the shareholder. The impact of such interventions should not be borne directly by the customer. 11

Methodology and Assumptions (6): Renewable Energy The premium paid for renewable energy is currently passed on to customers as Eskom has no control over pricing. The integration of the cost of the contracts into the tariff requires revisiting given the impact on customers. The annual update of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) has not taken place. Consequently, additional sources of supply are pursued without considering the ongoing reduction in demand or the most effective manner of implementation and associated pricing implications. 12

Methodology and Assumptions (7): Reduction in demand There are several reasons for the reduction in electricity demand, including the steep rises in the electricity price, compounded by lack of reliability and predictability. There are significant structural changes taking place in the economy with a shift from energy intensive primary and secondary sectors to the tertiary sector. There is also significantly improved energy efficiency by intensive users. 13

Figure 1: Trends in energy intensity and electricity sent out (EIUG, 2013) Improvements in energy intensity are leading to reduced energy demand per unit of economic output. 14

Methodology and Assumptions (8): Prudent Expenditure New plant delays and other factors under Eskom s control have resulted in certain of the revenue impairments. Cost recovery is critical to Eskom s financial viability, and we acknowledge the need to demonstrate that Eskom has a robust financial outlook. However, not all expenditure can be considered to have been incurred prudently. For any variance to be considered, let alone approved, NERSA needs to be provided with unambiguous motivation. An RCA application is not the appropriate context within which to determine Eskom s viability against the benchmarks in the original MYPD3 decision. If a revision is needed, this should not be done as part of the RCA application. 15

Part 2: Economic Impact (1) Average electricity tariffs have increased by a cumulative 70.18% between 2010/11 and 2014/15. MYPD2 & MYPD3 decisions were to increase the annual tariff by 11.51% p.a. between 2010/11 and 2017/18, and 8% p.a. for the MYPD3 period (65.51 c/kwh to 89.13 c/kwh). In the period from FY 2010/11 to 2017/18, the cumulative increase is already 123.72% (41.57 c/kwh to 89.13 c/kwh). In the 10 year period between 2007/8 2017/18, the electricity price is set to increase by 16.18% p.a. or a cumulative 348% 16

Economic Impact (2) The current re-opener application would impact severely on the viability of businesses and result in SA having one of the highest rates globally removing SA s historical competitive advantage of low electricity prices. According to the South African Reserve Bank (SARB), commenting prior to this application, the direct and indirect effects of such an increase could increase average inflation by around 0.5 percentage points over a year. This is in a context of increasing interest rates, thereby further impacting on businesses sustainability. Businesses have, with great difficulty, accommodated large tariff increases in the past. They simply cannot plan their investment, operations and long term strategy without adequate warning of tariffs increases. The magnitude of such an increase amplifies business uncertainty. 17

Economic Impact (3) The electricity price increases are not the only constraint on SA business. The current adverse global economic conditions significantly impact on business in SA, exacerbated by electricity price increases. The proposed increase does not take into account further increases arising from any additional taxes and levies on electricity sales by municipalities. Tariffs are not the only instrument to address Eskom s financial constraints and may divert attention from the need for a comprehensive debate on Eskom s long term structure and associated sustainability. 18

Conclusion We reiterate the need for a formally issued and up to date IRP, as its absence constitutes a fundamental challenge to an objective analysis of the country s energy needs and associated pricing. BUSA recognises that those elements of this application that comply with the methodology rules should be favourably considered. However there are, in a number of cases, insufficient motivation to justify the increase or the element is not included in the methodology and should therefore not be considered. The concept of prudent appears to be much more widely interpreted than BUSA believes should be the case and a clear view as to what constitutes prudent should be set out in the decision. 19

Conclusion (2) BUSA acknowledges the need for a sustainable financial trajectory for Eskom. However, this cannot be pursued without considering the consequences of approving this increase on the already fragile economy and the financial burdens faced by business at large. BUSA believes that precedent should be set where appropriate motivation is made in strict compliance with methodology. 20

Thank you