RE : Comments on Proposed Amendments to NI Continuous Disclosure Obligations

Similar documents
March 6, Attention of:

Directrice du secrétariat. 20 Queen Street West Tour de la Bourse, 800, square Victoria

CSA Notice and Request for Comment Proposed Amendments to National Instrument Prospectus Exemptions

Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Amendments.

Notice and Request for Comment

6.1.2 Adoption of a T+2 Settlement Cycle for Conventional Mutual Funds Proposed Amendments to National Instrument Investment Funds

M e Anne-Marie Beaudoin

May 29, Comments on Proposed National Instrument Registration Requirements. Dear Sirs / Mesdames,

CSA Staff Notice and Request for Comment Soliciting Dealer Arrangements

BY

Lang Michener LLP Lawyers Patent & Trade Mark Agents

July 12, Ladies and Gentlemen:

April 20, Attention: VIA

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.N.W.T. 1988, ch. S-5, AS AMENDED. IN THE MATTER OF Certain Exemptions for Capital Accumulation Plans

CSA Staff Notice and Request for Comment Soliciting Dealer Arrangements

Sent by electronic mail: November 11, 2013

The Canadian Securities Administrators (the CSA or we) are publishing for a 90 day comment period proposed amendments (the Proposed Amendments) to:

May 28, The Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 20 Queen Street West 22nd Floor Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8

Montréal, QC H4Z 1G3 Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

30 Eglinton Avenue West, Suite 306 Mississauga ON L5R 3E7 Tel: (905) Website: October 16, 2009

CSA Consultation Paper Auditor Oversight Issues in Foreign Jurisdictions

January 2, c/o Mr. John Stevenson, Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 20 Queen Street West Suite 800, Box 55 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8.

Re: Proposed Amendments to NI and its Policy Re. Client Relationship Model Phase 2 (CRM2) Amendments

BY

Unofficial consolidation April 1, 2017 FORM F1. Insider Profile

Sloane Capital Corp.

VIA lautorite.gc.ca. October 5, 2016

Re: Comments with respect to Proposed Amendments to National Instrument and

February 28 th, Cc Western Exempt Market Association Fax:

Attention: The Secretary Me Anne-Marie Beaudoin

Igm. VIA comments(ü;osc.uov.on.ca; consultation-en-cours(a lautoritc.gc.ca. January 25, 2018

VIA September 20, 2012

December 5, 2018 BY

CANADIAN SECURITY TRADERS ASSOCIATION, INC. P.O. Box 3, 31 Adelaide Street East, Toronto, Ontario M5C 2H8

Mr. John Stevenson Madame Beaudoin June 20, 2007 Page 1. June 20, By electronic mail

VERONICA ARMSTRONG LAW CORPORATION

FORM F1 REPORT OF EXEMPT DISTRIBUTION

Form F2 Change or Surrender of Individual Categories (section 2.2(2), 2.4, 2.6(2) or 4.1(4))

Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) The Forum for Hedge Funds, Managed Futures and Managed Currencies

Form F1 REPORT OF EXEMPT DISTRIBUTION

COMPANION POLICY CP REGISTRATION INFORMATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

September 7, Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

Via . The Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 20 Queen Street West 22 nd Floor Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8

Re: Pension Investment Association of Canada ( PIAC ) Comments on CSA Proposed National Instrument Derivatives: Business Conduct

CSA Multilateral Notice and Request for Comment Draft Regulation to amend Regulation respecting Prospectus Exemptions

VIA

BY April 12, 2013

Directrice du secrétariat. 20 Queen Street West Tour de la Bourse, 800, square Victoria 19 th Floor, Box 55 C.P. 246, 22e étage

Annex C. Amendments to National Instrument Prospectus Exemptions

September 16 th, 2015

NATIONAL INSTRUMENT DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

FAS KE N MARTINEAU. July 10, 2013

CSA Notice and Request for Comment. Proposed National Instrument Prohibition of Binary Options and Related Proposed Companion Policy

DELIVERED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Dear Sirs, Re: Proposed National Instrument and Proposed Amendments to OSC Rule

Cc Western Exempt Market Association E: Hon. Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance E:

August 22, 2013 SENT BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

BY MAIL & and

July 12, and- Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT

Form F2 Start-up Crowdfunding Offering Document

Notice and Request for Comment Proposed National Instrument Derivatives: Business Conduct and Proposed Companion Policy CP

Request for Comments

Re: Comments on proposed Corporate Governance Policy and proposed instruments, , , and CP

Amendments to National Instrument Registration Information

Proposed Amendments to National Instruments , and Related Forms and Companion Policies Response to Request for Comments

FORM F7 REINSTATEMENT OF REGISTERED INDIVIDUALS AND PERMITTED INDIVIDUALS (sections 2.3 and 2.5(2))

This notice summarizes the OM-form exemption orders and includes a request for comments.

Re: CSA Staff Consultation Note Review of Minimum Amount and Accredited Investor Exemptions Public Consultation

THE VOICE OF THE SHAREHOLDER. November 13, 2013

Delivered By

September 24, 2010 SUBMITTED BY

January 14, c/o John Stevenson, Secretary Ontario Securities Commission 20 Queen Street West 19 th Floor, Box 55 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8.

Insolvency Statistics in Canada. September 2015

Centre d affaires Henri-IV 1035 Wilfrid-Pelletier Ave., Suite 500 Quebec City, QC G1W 0C5 Canada

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT LISTING REPRESENTATION AND STATUTORY RIGHTS OF ACTION DISCLOSURE EXEMPTIONS

June 14, John Stevenson Secretary, Ontario Securities Commission

IFIC Submission. Mutual Fund Fees. Proposed Amendments to National Instrument Mutual Fund Sales Practices and Related Consequential Amendments

Notice of Proposed amendments to National Instrument Marketplace Operation and Companion Policy CP. and

Federal and Provincial/Territorial Tax Rates for Income Earned

Multilateral Instrument Passport System and National Policy Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions

APPENDIX G CONSEQUENTIAL CHANGES TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS, MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENTS AND COMPANION POLICIES

September 6, Canadian Securities Administrators (see list below) Care of:

STIKEMAN ELLIOTT. Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors

National Instrument Definitions. (3) In a national instrument or multilateral instrument

The members of the Canadian Insurance Services Regulatory Organizations (CISRO) include representatives from the following regulators:

Delivered By

2011 BCSECCOM 77. Applicable British Columbia Provisions National Instrument Insider Reporting Requirements and Exemptions, s. 10.

Notice. Draft Regulation to amend Regulation respecting Mutual Funds

Re: Proposed National Instrument Registration Requirements

ABCD. Dear Sirs: SENT BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

2005 BCSECCOM 580. and. In the Matter of the Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications. and

Insolvency Statistics in Canada. April 2013

June 7, The Secretary. 20 Queen Street West 19th Floor, Box 55 Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S8 Fax:

Re: Revised Draft National Instrument "Registration Requirements" - Comments Submitted by Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT REGISTRATION INFORMATION

February 15, Re: Request for Comments on the CSA Staff Consultation Paper Real-Time Market Data Fees. Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

July 11, To the attention of:

MULTILATERAL INSTRUMENT RESALE OF SECURITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS

POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA 751 VICTORIA SQUARE, MONTRÉAL, QUÉBEC, CANADA H2Y 2J3

Transcription:

1470 Hurontario Street, Suite 201, Mississauga, Ontario L5G 3H4 Telephone (905) 274-1639 Facsimile (905) 274-7861 Web Site: www.ciri.org E-Mail:enquiries@ciri.org March 9, 2006 British Columbia Securities Commission Alberta Securities Commission Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission Securities Division Manitoba Securities Commission Ontario Securities Commission Autorité des marches financiers New Brunswick Securities Commission Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia Securities Commission Newfoundland and Labrador Securities Commission Registrar of Securities, Northwest Territories Registrar of Securities, Government of Yukon Registrar of Securities, Nunavut Submitted by e-mail to: Rosann Youck, Secretary Anne-Marie Beaudoin Chair of the Continuous Disclosure Secretary Harmonization Committee Autorité des marchés financiers British Columbia Securities Commission Stock Exchange Tower PO Box 10142, Pacific Centre 800 Victoria Square 701 West Georgia Street P.O. Box 246, 22 nd Floor Vancouver, British Columbia Montréal, Québec V7Y 1L2 H4Z 1G3 E-mail: ryouck@bcsc.bc.ca E-mail: consultation-en-cours@lautorite.qc.ca RE : Comments on Proposed Amendments to NI 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations The Canadian Investor Relations Institute (CIRI) is pleased to respond to the CSA s Request for Comment regarding proposed amendments to NI 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations, Related Forms and Companion Policy, NI 52-107 Acceptable Accounting Principles, Auditing Standards and Reporting Currency, and NI 71-102 Continuous Disclosure and Other Exemptions Relating to Foreign Issuers and Companion Policy CIRI is a professional, not-for-profit organization of corporate executives and consultants responsible for communication between public companies and the investment community. With over 800 members as of the end of 2005, CIRI is the world s second largest society of investor relations professionals. CIRI is headquartered in Mississauga and has active chapters in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver.

CIRI is dedicated to advancing the stature and credibility of the investor relations (IR) profession and the competency of its members. CIRI is recognized as the Canadian authority on investor relations, and is committed to enabling fair and efficient capital markets. As part of that commitment, CIRI takes a strong interest in continuous disclosure obligations to aid shareholders in making informed investment decisions. General Comments CIRI supports the proposed amendments to NI 51-102. In the comments below, we have expanded on areas of particular importance from an investor relations perspective. For the two areas of CIRI s concern, we repeat, in bold type, the CSA s questions from the Request for Comment notice. 2. Request Form We propose amending section 4.6 of NI 51-102 to remove the requirement for issuers to send a request form to their shareholders each year. We have not changed the requirement for issuers to mail their financial statements and MD&A to any shareholder that requests them, or to disclose in the information circular how the shareholders may request the financial statements and MD&A. CIRI is concerned about the consequences of this amendment, primarily from the shareholder s point of view. If left to the discretion of each issuer as to how shareholders may request each issuer s annual and/or interim financial statements and MD&As on the initial delivery dates, then it is very likely that shareholders would be given a confusing array of methods to request these documents. For example, without more detailed specification in NI 51-102, a shareholder of four different securities could be instructed to send a request by e-mail to one issuer, by mail to the second issuer, by phone to the third issuer and by facsimile to the fourth issuer. Further, the specified recipient of those requests could also vary widely from issuer to issuer including: the issuers law firm, transfer agent or to any of the issuer s departments. CIRI agrees that it is helpful to shareholders to require every issuer to disclose in the information circular and the annual information form as to how an issuer s shareholders may contact that issuer to request the financial statements and MD&A. CIRI does not agree, however, that how that contact is made should be left to the discretion of each issuer and would prefer that NI 51-102 was more specific. As a solution, CIRI recommends that NI 51-102 require issuers to use the existing proxy form and the voting instruction form as the request forms upon which shareholders should request annual and/or interim financial statements and MD&As on the initial delivery dates. If this recommendation was followed, a shareholder would be asked to simply mark a box on the proxy or voting instruction form rather than having to fill out a separate request form. The advantages of using the proxy and voting instruction forms to request the financial statements and MD&A include: eliminating the need for either the issuer or the shareholder to create, handle or process a separate request form; reducing the number of forms sent to each shareholder; allowing shareholders the ease of using a form that already identifies the shareholder, thus eliminating any need for the shareholder to write down his or her name and address and any errors that could result from any missing or misread mailing information on a hand-written form; and providing shareholders with a consistent format to request this material for all securities. Canadian Investor Relations Institute 2 March 9, 2006

a) Do you agree that we should remove the requirement to deliver an annual request form? Why? No. CIRI recommends the use of a form to provide consistency in how shareholders contact issuers to request the financial statements and MD&A. As stated earlier CIRI recommends, however, that rather than using a separate request form, the request for this material be indicated on the proxy or the voting instruction form. Online voting could be amended to include a selection box for the shareholder to request this information. b) If we retain it, should we amend the requirement to specify (i) when and how an issuer should send the request form, or Yes. NI 51-102 should require that an issuer add a selection box on the proxy form and on the voting instruction form. The regulations for sending these forms need not be specified in section 4.6 of NI 51-102. (ii) the content of the request form As CIRI does not recommend using a separate form to request the financial statements and the MD&A, there would be no need to specify the content. c) Are there any other changes we should make to the request form, if we retain it? No, CIRI does not recommend any other changes to the request form. CIRI does recommend, however, that the CSA extend its influence to effect changes in regional securities acts, including section 79.(1) of the Ontario Securities Act, to harmonize with NI 51-102 as to the default action that issuers must take with regard to delivering the financial statements and MD&A. The acts stipulate that issuers must send this material to registered shareholders unless otherwise specified by the shareholder. NI 51-102 allows issuers to refrain from sending this material to any shareholders, including registered shareholders, unless otherwise specified by the shareholder. This conflict in approach renders this particular aspect of sector 4.6 (1) of NI 51-102 redundant as the acts takes precedence and the conflict is confusing for issuers and shareholders alike. d) If we eliminate the request form, is there an alternative we could propose to replace the request form that would allow shareholders to request financial statements and MD&A? As stated earlier, CIRI recommends that a separate request form be replaced by adding a selection box on the proxy form and the voting instruction form, providing a consistent request format for shareholders and enabling issuers to efficiently solicit shareholder response to the delivery of the annual and interim financial statements and MD&A. Canadian Investor Relations Institute 3 March 9, 2006

3. Delivery of financial statements Under NI 51-102, an issuer must mail its financial statements to any securityholder that requests them. An issuer is exempt from this requirement if it mails its statements to all its securityholders. We propose to clarify in the exemption when the issuer has to deliver the financial statements to rely on the exemption. We believe the delivery deadline should be the same if an issuer is sending the statements on request, or to all its securityholders under the exemption. We think it is important that securityholders that want paper copies of the financial statements have prompt access to them once they are filed. Their access should not be affected by the issuer relying on an exemption. As we recognize that an issuer may need time to copy the statements after filing them, we have extended the delivery deadline to no later than 10 days after the filing deadline. Do you agree with this change? CIRI agrees that the current wording of section 4 of NI 51-102 requires clarification. CIRI also agrees that shareholders should have access to paper copies of the financial statements and MD&A. CIRI does not, however, agree that the obligation of issuers to provide paper copies of those materials should place an undue burden upon issuers for the relatively few requests for paper copies that most issuers receive. The proposed amendment does not significantly change the current status of the NI 51-102. The consequences of implementing the proposed amendment can still cause issuers to incur two mailings to their shareholders in advance of their annual meetings; one mailing for the financial statements and MD&A and a second mailing for the proxy, management information circular, notice of annual meeting and other proxy related materials. Issuers wishing to avoid two mailings will be forced to move their annual meetings or their fiscal year ends to bring those two events close enough together so that their record dates for their annual meetings occur before the required delivery date of their financial statements and MD&A. A side effect of accelerated annual meeting dates could be a concentration of annual meetings over a shorter period of time, which, in turn, could result in a possible shortage of venues, and in scheduling conflicts between issuers as well as between directors sitting on several boards, transfer agents acting as scrutineers, members of the investment community and others who involved in annual meetings. CIRI is concerned that the proposed amendment places too much significance on the early delivery of paper copies of the financial statements and MD&A. Most shareholders, potential investors and investment analysts regularly make use of online access to these materials. With the successful adoption in 2005 of the new filing deadlines specified in NI 51-102, the majority of those interested in obtaining those documents can do so relatively soon after the end of the reporting period. CIRI recommends that the requirement to deliver paper copies of the financial statements and MD&A be timed with the delivery of the proxy and proxy related materials. This recommendation would still allow shareholders to receive paper copies of the financial statements and MD&A in advance of the annual meeting without unduly burdening issuers to rush the production of these paper copies. Although the proposed amendments recognize that issuers need time to copy any reports for shareholders, the proposed extension of 10 days would not, however, handle all issuers requirements to produce a sufficient number of annual reports. Many issuers still publish the financial statements and MD&A in a full-colour annual report, which usually requires more than 10 days to print, dry, bind, package and distribute. CIRI s recommendation allows issuers the time to fully complete the printing process of the annual reports and still deliver these reports in advance of the annual meeting. Canadian Investor Relations Institute 4 March 9, 2006

CIRI agrees that NI 51-102 should still specify that issuers be required to fulfill, within 10 days, any requests for the financial statements and MD&A that issuers receive after they have completed their primary mailing of the financial statements and MD&A. In addition to disclosing how shareholders may request the financial statements and MD&A in the information circular, many issuers have a contact us section on their web sites where shareholders or other interested parties can request disclosure documents by e-mail or phone. We strongly encourage this practice. And finally, to accommodate the very few shareholders who are impatient to receive paper copies of the financial statements and MD&A and who can not or are not willing to print this material from the issuer s web site or the SEDAR web site, CIRI recommends that if the final published copies are not yet available, issuers be required to print a black and white copy of the online documents and forward them to the shareholder within 10 days. CIRI appreciates the opportunity to make this submission and we would be pleased to answer any questions you may have. Bob Tait President & CEO, CIRI (905) 274-1639, btait@ciri.org Jane Watson Interim Chair, CIRI s Issues Committee (905) 274-2414 jane.watson@watsonir.ca Jo-Anne Archibald CIRI s Issues Committee (416) 815-0700 x271 jarchibald@equicomgroup.com Canadian Investor Relations Institute 5 March 9, 2006