Filing # E-Filed 04/07/ :06:24 PM

Similar documents
Filing # E-Filed 05/23/ :26:50 PM

Filing # E-Filed 12/15/ :11:41 PM

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. IN AND FOR DUVAL f} C A. Plaintiff, Case No. COMPLAINT

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT. 17 RCW , RCW , and RCW The Attorney General brings this

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, v. Case No. COMPLAINT

INTRODUCTION. TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ("UBER" or "Defendant") pursuant to North Carolina's Unfair and

Texas State Statutes Regulating Debt Collection / Debt Collectors FINANCE CODE: CHAPTER 392. DEBT COLLECTION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 9:18-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/05/2018 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE#

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. The Plaintiff, Frederick W. Kortum, Jr., sues the Defendant, Alex Sink, in

CHAPTER 22 MISSISSIPPI NONPROFIT DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT [REPEALED EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2006] Section

IRONSHORE COMPANIES. One State Street Plaza 7th Floor New York, NY Toll Free: (877) IRON411

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 27, 2014

DISTRICT COURT, BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO th Street Boulder, Colorado THE STATE OF COLORADO, ex rel. John W. Suthers, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Case 2:17-cv JMV-SCM Document 1 Filed 08/01/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

8:18-cv DCC Date Filed 01/03/18 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

Sokaogon Chippewa Community Ordinances

Defendant. Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1

FILLING OUT THE ANSWER

Case 2:17-cv SDW-LDW Document 1 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : :

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA

Texas Finance Code, Chapter 393

AIG American International Companies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

HUDSON SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY Employed Ancillary Provider Application for surplus lines coverage

RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INSURANCE DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES

I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name of Applicant: a. Principle Address: b. Policy Contact Name & Title. c. Contact Address: II. WORKFORCE INFORMATION

54TH LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2019

City/State: From: To: City/State: From: To: City/State: From: To:

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/17/14 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

TAX OBJECTION COMPLAINT PACKET

Application for Management Liability Insurance for Not for Profit Organizations

IC Chapter 8. Professional Fundraiser Consultant and Solicitor Registration

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION. CASE NO.: 9:15-cv-81685

Case 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 10

TITLE 28 LENDING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT

A Bill Regular Session, 2019 HOUSE BILL 1978

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AIG American International Companies

Case 2:06-cv JWL-DJW Document 1 Filed 05/19/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

PRIVATE COMPANY SUPPLEMENTAL CLAIM FORM

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU MAY BE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM. NOT ALL CLASS MEMBERS ARE REQUIRED TO FILE A CLAIM FORM.

THE HARTFORD D&O PREMIER DEFENSE sm APPLICATION (FOR EMERGING MARKET)

The plaintiff complaining of defendants, alleges and says: INTRODUCTION

RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYED LAWYERS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE

Application for Coverage Ancillary This application is for claims made coverage. Please read the policy carefully.

THE HARTFORD EMPLOYED LAWYERS CHOICE LIABILITY POLICY sm INSURANCE APPLICATION

IRONSHORE INSURANCE INC. One State Street Plaza, 8 th Floor New York, NY Tel: Toll Free: (877) IRON-411

4:10-cv TLW Date Filed 03/18/10 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12

State National Insurance Company, Inc. Administered by Hiscox Inc. PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY PROGRAM

CHECKFREE CORPORATION CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT FOR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND ASSOCIATES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-DIMITROULEAS

Case 1:13-cv NLH-KMW Document 1 Filed 08/30/13 Page 1 of 19 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/11/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/11/2016

Enrolled Copy H.B. 70 HEALTH DISCOUNT PROGRAM CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT. Chief Sponsor: James A. Dunnigan Senate Sponsor: Michael G.

THE HARTFORD PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY SM TRUSTEE SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION

APPLICATION FOR ABA EMPLOYERS EDGE SM AN EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY FOR LAW FIRMS ENDORSED BY THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION

Case 2:16-cv JEO Document 1 Filed 05/19/16 Page 1 of 12

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR SPECIAL COUNSEL SERVICES OPIOID LITIGATION BURLINGTON COUNTY SOLICITOR'S OFFICE

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO CASE NO.: JUDGE

MODEL CONSUMER DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACT February 2004

Case No.: CLASS ACTION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PURSUANT TO THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT, 15 U.S.C. 1692, ET SEQ.

Case 1:13-cv PLM Doc #8 Filed 12/23/13 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#44

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ECF CASE DEFENDANTS ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS

Federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Section 6032 on Fraud, Waste, and Abuse

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

Ecug!2<27.ex.13599!!!Fqewogpv!2!!!Hkngf! !!!Rcig!2!qh!26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Defendant.

When it Hits the Fan: Fiduciary Liability Claims Trends

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY

CLAIMS MADE SCHOOL BOARD LEGAL LIABILITY INSURANCE APPLICATION Darwin National Assurance Company Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company

CALIFORNIA CODES CIVIL CODE SECTION This title may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971."

ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE ON THE UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW. Appointed by the Supreme Court of New Jersey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COURT FILE NO.: INTRODUCTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 2:12-cv CCC-JAD Document 1 Filed 06/15/12 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES STAFF ANALYSIS REFERENCE ACTION ANALYST STAFF DIRECTOR SUMMARY ANALYSIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION. CASE NO.: 9:15-cv-81685

Case 2:16-cv JCM-CWH Document 53 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 7. Plaintiff(s),

VIRTUE GUARD VIRTUE RISK PARTNERS

Purpose of article. Mississippi Statutes. Title 75. REGULATION OF TRADE, COMMERCE AND INVESTMENTS. Chapter 67. LOANS

A. Current number of: Partners: All other full-time employees: All other attorneys: Part-time employees (including seasonal and temporary):

Case 1:17-cv MJW Document 5 Filed 03/03/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

DEFENDANT, TYLER KUKAHIKO'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND COUNTER-CLAIMS

Case 3:17-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 01/19/17 Page 1 of 13

CFPB Consumer Laws and Regulations

SecurePlus Provider universal life insurance policy SecurePlus Paragon universal life insurance policy. a class action lawsuit may affect your rights.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA -CIVIL DIVISION-

[Second Reprint] ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 214th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2010 SESSION

FY 05 Actual FY 06 Budget FY 07 Budget

From Article at GetOutOfDebt.org

81 LAWYER S PARTICIPATION IN PREPAID

THE HARTFORD PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY SM THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATORS SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION

THIS NOTICE IS DIRECTED TO:

IC Chapter 2. Farm Mutual Insurance Companies

APPRAISAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY APPLICATION

Transcription:

Filing # 54789287 E-Filed 04/07/2017 12:06:24 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA GOLD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. d/b/a The Ticket Clinic, a Florida professional Association/corporation, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. TIKD HOLDINGS CORPORATION d/b/a TIKD.COM and/or TIKD, a Delaware corporation not Registered to do business in the State of Florida, CHRISTOPHER RILEY and TIM BERTHOLD, Defendants. / COMPLAINT Plaintiff hereby sues Defendants and alleges: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiff ( The Ticket Clinic ) is a duly licensed Florida professional association and corporation with offices in Broward County, Florida. The Ticket Clinic is one of the nation s first and oldest law firms to concentrate on defending drivers charged with traffic offenses. Established in 1987, 30 years ago, The Ticket Clinic s success has created a myriad of imitators, who, until recently, have all been attorneys, bound by all professional and ethical rules. 2. Defendant TIKD HOLDINGS CORPORATION ( TIKD ) is a Delaware Corporation doing business in the State of Florida, including doing business in Broward County, Florida, under the name TIKD.COM and/or TIKD; and Defendant CHRISTOPHER RILEY is the CEO of TIKD, and Defendant TIM BERTHOLD is the COO of TIKD both are residents of the State of Florida. 3. TIKD, a foreign corporation, is not registered to do business in the State of Florida. 1

4. While maintaining offices in Florida, and doing business in Florida, TIKD has failed to register to do business in Florida and does not maintain a registered agent in Florida. 5. The Ticket Clinic has been in business for many years in the State of Florida as a law firm that provides legal services to persons receiving traffic violations ranging from simple civil traffic infractions to criminal traffic infractions for DUI, and the like. 6. TIKD in engaged in a business, as more fully described below, which is unfairly, improperly and illegally competing with the business of The Ticket Clinic as it relates to providing legal services to persons in 13 counties in the State of Florida, including Broward County, who have received civil traffic infractions. 7. As detailed herein, TIKD, a corporation headed by Christopher Riley, its CEO, and Tim Berthold, its COO, both of whom are non-lawyers, in addition to doing business in Florida without being properly registered to do so, is illegally operating a law firm run by non-lawyers to unfairly and improperly compete with The Ticket Clinic, while deceiving consumers in Florida in the process and while not being subject to Rules that properly licensed lawyers are bound by and obligated to follow which Rules are designed specifically to protect consumers such as those persons in Florida that have received a civil traffic infraction. 8. Consumers who choose The Ticket Clinic to represent them to defend a civil traffic infraction actually hire the law firm of their choosing. 9. Consumers who choose TIKD to deal with their civil traffic infraction are falsely led to believe that they are selecting an alternative to hiring a lawyer, when in fact said consumers choosing TIKD are obtaining legal representation chosen solely by TIKD not the consumer. 10. While TIKD, marketed as an app for your cell phone, falsely advertises on tikd.com that it is offering an alternative to hiring a lawyer, the consumers who actually submit their civil 2

traffic infractions to TIKD are, in turn, represented by lawyers chosen solely by TIKD without any discretion by the consumer. 11. A consumer that submits a civil traffic infraction to TIKD has no idea of the qualifications or expertise of the lawyer representing said consumer, while legitimate and properly licensed lawyers like those at The Ticket Clinic who advertise their services are required to provide such information about the qualification or expertise of its lawyers upon request at any time. 12. On its website, TIKD, while operating illegally as a law firm run by two nonlawyers, is making a myriad of false and deceptive advertising claims to deceive the public and to unfairly, improperly and illegally compete with The Ticket Clinic, which a legitimate and proper law firm would not be permitted to make, including: a) comparing TIKD services to other lawyers, claiming, among other things, that: with Tikd you save as much or more than if you hired a lawyer; b) making guarantees to pay financial penalties imposed by courts and/or the full cost of their ticket ; c) promising to get rid of your traffic ticket in 2 minutes or less; d) guaranteeing savings; e) promising that you can sit back and relax after retaining TIKD; f) claiming that, when using TIKD, you will always be better off than if you chose to not to challenge the ticket and just paid for it; g) promising to cover the full cost of your ticket no matter the price even if the cost is higher than what you paid us; 3

h) as to legitimate and duly licensed lawyers like The Ticket Clinic, claiming that lawyers get about the same outcome as individuals who challenge their own ticket; i) as to legitimate and duly licensed lawyers like The Ticket Clinic, claiming that [l]awyer costs vary but the average seems to be about $150 per ticket. j) as to legitimate and duly licensed lawyers like The Ticket Clinic, claiming that handling your ticket using a lawyer is more expensive than using TIKD. k) when comparing TIKD s services to other phone apps, claiming these apps are essentially the same thing as hiring a lawyer; l) improperly and illegally claiming that TIKD will absorb[ ] the risk of the outcome. m) improperly holding themselves out as a law firm, claiming: since we handle many cases, we can afford the randomness, and For all the tickets that TIKD accepts, we will handle the court appearance, if required, on your behalf with a fully licensed and qualified lawyer. Not only is this in violation, as are other matters claimed by Tikd in its advertisement, of the Florida Rules of Professional Responsibility, these matters constitute the Unauthorized Practice of Law pursuant to 454.23, which provides that a person holding themselves out as a lawyer commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083 or s. 775.084; and n) improperly guaranteeing results, claiming to Guarantee that you will not receive any points on your license. 13. The false and deceptive representations made by TIKD, in addition to being false and deceptive, are representations that duly licensed lawyers and legitimate law firms are not permitted to make to consumers or the general public. 4

14. Additionally, TIKD is improperly and illegally giving legal advice, claiming that the resolution of a ticket is random, rather than based upon the facts and circumstances of each case, as well as the defenses that may apply to particular facts. 15. While claiming, in a false and misleading manner, to be an alternative to hiring a lawyer, TIKD does: i) hire lawyers; ii) collect the entire legal fee; and iii) keep most of that fee after paying a fee to a covering attorney all in a manner that involves and constitutes illegal fee-splitting with a non-lawyer. 16. The Ticket Clinic, a business and law firm, is a Consumer within the meaning of 501.203(7), and is an entity or person that has been aggrieved, within the meaning of 501.211(1), thereby entitling The Ticket Clinic to seek and obtain relief under 501.201, et. seq., the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, especially where many of the deceptive practices and acts are directed at The Ticket Clinic to improperly compete with The Ticket Clinic. 17. Defendants are engaged in trade or commerce as defined in 501.203(8), by advertising, soliciting and offering services. 18. By the acts described above, including all quotations of advertising on TIKD s website, Defendants have engaged in unfair methods of competition, unfair and deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade and commerce, and unconscionable acts or practices in violation of 501.204(1). 19. All of the false and deceptive claims by TIKD, detailed in 12 above, have not been approved by The Florida Bar, nor has approval even been sought by TIKD. 20. The damages caused by TIKD s unfair and deceptive acts cannot properly be measured, and The Ticket Clinic does not have an adequate remedy at law. 5

21. Further, and notwithstanding whether or not The Ticket Clinic has an adequate remedy at law, The Ticket Clinic has the legal right to injunctive relief provided for in 501.211(1), by being a consumer who has been aggrieved by the deceptive and unfair practices of Defendants, as well as costs and attorney s fees under 501.2105. 22. Defendants have violated, are violating and will continue to violate the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, unless enjoined from doing so. 23. The Ticket Clinic, by being a consumer who has been aggrieved by the deceptive and unfair practices of Defendant, are also entitled to declaratory relief, in addition to injunctive relief, under 501.211(1). 24. The improper and illegal nature of TIKD cannot be cured by enjoining any single act or combination of acts by virtue of the fact that TIKD is tantamount to an illegal law firm run by two non-lawyers through a corporate entity, engaging in the unauthorized practice of law, with improper and illegal fee-splitting, while making deceptive and false claims in improper and illegal solicitations of consumers that a legitimate law firm could never make, all being carried out to illegally compete with The Ticket Clinic and other legitimate and proper law firms. 25. TIKD is not a law firm, and its founders and officers, RILEY and BERTHOLD are not lawyers; yet, TIKD, RILEY and BERTHOLD make legal representations about traffic law, accept fees from clients and make promises regarding the outcome. 26. TIKD, RILEY and BERTHOLD are not bound by or subject to any Rules or Regulations promulgated by The Florida Bar, including, but not limited to, Rules regarding advertising, and therefore are making outrageous, deceptive and false claims. 27. TIKD, RILEY and BERTHOLD are practicing law without a license, and the public consumers are their victims. While claiming to have a magic algorithm that takes the guesswork 6

out of defending traffic tickets, there is no substitute for a law degree and such defense is a legal matter left to lawyers under proper regulation and supervision for the benefit of the public. 28. In promising to pay a fine if they lose at no additional cost, TIKD, RILEY and BERTHOLD make a promise that a lawyer or law firm cannot possibly make, and they essentially rob Peter (those persons whose cases are dismissed with no fine or court cost after paying TIKD 75-80% of the fine stated in the citation) to pay Paul (those persons who are directed to pay the fine in full or greater, with costs) which is a house of cards that will eventually fall, leaving clients with no remedy. 29. In addition to unfairly and illegally competing with The Ticket Clinic in violation of Ch. 501.201, et. seq., TIKD, RILEY and BERTHOLD are damaging the public, as well, by operating a law firm that is not legitimate, and not subject to professional and ethical rules designed to protect the public, and said Defendants must, therefore, be enjoined. WHEREFORE The Ticket Clinic demands judgment against Defendants in the following manner: a) permanently enjoining each Defendant from operating TIKD through its mobile app and website; b) permanently enjoining the individual Defendants from creating another entity to run a similar business that operates as law firm engaging in the unauthorized practice of law with improper fee-splitting, while making deceptive and false claims; c) an award of attorney s fees and costs under 501.2015; and d) any other relief deemed just and proper. 7

8 /s/ Louis Arslanian LOUIS C. ARSLANIAN GOLD & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 5800 Sheridan Street Hollywood, Florida 33021 (954) 922-2926 Tel. arsgabriela@comcast.net FBN 801925