A pricing model for the Guaranteed Lifelong Withdrawal Benefit Option

Similar documents
Policyholder Exercise Behavior for Variable Annuities including Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits 1

Matematisk statistik Tentamen: kl FMS170/MASM19 Prissättning av Derivattillgångar, 9 hp Lunds tekniska högskola. Solution.

The Impact of Stochastic Volatility on Pricing, Hedging, and Hedge Efficiency of Variable Annuity Guarantees

INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA

MAFS Quantitative Modeling of Derivative Securities

Equivalent Martingale Measure in Asian Geometric Average Option Pricing

The Mathematics Of Stock Option Valuation - Part Four Deriving The Black-Scholes Model Via Partial Differential Equations

Option Valuation of Oil & Gas E&P Projects by Futures Term Structure Approach. Hidetaka (Hugh) Nakaoka

Black-Scholes Model and Risk Neutral Pricing

Fee Structure and Surrender Incentives in Variable Annuities

Analyzing Surplus Appropriation Schemes in Participating Life Insurance from the Insurer s and the Policyholder s Perspective

Risk Management of a DB Underpin Pension Plan

Introduction to Black-Scholes Model

Pricing FX Target Redemption Forward under. Regime Switching Model

FINAL EXAM EC26102: MONEY, BANKING AND FINANCIAL MARKETS MAY 11, 2004

Pricing Guaranteed Annuity Option with Surrender Rates Consideration

Constructing Out-of-the-Money Longevity Hedges Using Parametric Mortality Indexes. Johnny Li

(1 + Nominal Yield) = (1 + Real Yield) (1 + Expected Inflation Rate) (1 + Inflation Risk Premium)

Models of Default Risk

FAIR VALUATION OF INSURANCE LIABILITIES. Pierre DEVOLDER Université Catholique de Louvain 03/ 09/2004

Tentamen i 5B1575 Finansiella Derivat. Måndag 27 augusti 2007 kl Answers and suggestions for solutions.

A dual approach to some multiple exercise option problems

Stochastic Interest Rate Approach of Pricing Participating Life Insurance Policies with Embedded Surrender Option

Risk Management of Variable Annuities

LIDSTONE IN THE CONTINUOUS CASE by. Ragnar Norberg

IJRSS Volume 2, Issue 2 ISSN:

MA Advanced Macro, 2016 (Karl Whelan) 1

INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA

Li Gan Guan Gong Michael Hurd. April, 2006

CURRENCY TRANSLATED OPTIONS

Pricing formula for power quanto options with each type of payoffs at maturity

An Analytical Implementation of the Hull and White Model

Proceedings of the 48th European Study Group Mathematics with Industry 1

Single Premium of Equity-Linked with CRR and CIR Binomial Tree

Pricing options on defaultable stocks

Hull-White one factor model Version

HEDGING SYSTEMATIC MORTALITY RISK WITH MORTALITY DERIVATIVES

May 2007 Exam MFE Solutions 1. Answer = (B)

Principles of Finance CONTENTS

The Binomial Model and Risk Neutrality: Some Important Details

Financial Econometrics (FinMetrics02) Returns, Yields, Compounding, and Horizon

Fair Valuation of Participating Policies in Stochastic Interest Rate Models: Two-dimensional Cox-Ross-Rubinstein Approaches

UCLA Department of Economics Fall PhD. Qualifying Exam in Macroeconomic Theory

Optimal Early Exercise of Vulnerable American Options

A Method for Estimating the Change in Terminal Value Required to Increase IRR

Optimal Funding of a Defined Benefit Pension Plan

Volatility and Hedging Errors

Description of the CBOE S&P 500 2% OTM BuyWrite Index (BXY SM )

Foreign Exchange, ADR s and Quanto-Securities

Spring 2011 Social Sciences 7418 University of Wisconsin-Madison

MATURITY GUARANTEES EMBEDDED IN UNIT-LINKED CONTRACTS VALUATION & RISK MANAGEMENT *

Economic Growth Continued: From Solow to Ramsey

The Effect of Open Market Repurchase on Company s Value

1. To express the production function in terms of output per worker and capital per worker, divide by N: K f N

Erratic Price, Smooth Dividend. Variance Bounds. Present Value. Ex Post Rational Price. Standard and Poor s Composite Stock-Price Index

Corporate Finance. Capital budgeting. Standalone risk of capital project

Market Models. Practitioner Course: Interest Rate Models. John Dodson. March 29, 2009

Incorporating Risk Preferences into Real Options Models. Murat Isik

Final Exam Answers Exchange Rate Economics

Extended MAD for Real Option Valuation

The Interaction of Guarantees, Surplus Distribution, and Asset Allocation in With Profit Life Insurance Policies

On the Interaction between Transfer Restrictions and Crediting Strategies in Guaranteed Funds

Betting on Death and Capital Markets in Retirement: A Shortfall Risk Analysis of Life Annuities versus Phased Withdrawal Plans

COOPERATION WITH TIME-INCONSISTENCY. Extended Abstract for LMSC09

Description of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index (BXR SM )

Labor Cost and Sugarcane Mechanization in Florida: NPV and Real Options Approach

Bond Prices and Interest Rates

How Risky is Electricity Generation?

Origins of currency swaps

Black-Scholes and the Volatility Surface

Synthetic CDO s and Basket Default Swaps in a Fixed Income Credit Portfolio

Valuation and Hedging of Correlation Swaps. Mats Draijer

EFFICIENT POST-RETIREMENT ASSET ALLOCATION

Risk-Neutral Probabilities Explained

A Note on Missing Data Effects on the Hausman (1978) Simultaneity Test:

An Indian Journal FULL PAPER. Trade Science Inc. The principal accumulation value of simple and compound interest ABSTRACT KEYWORDS

Online Appendix. Using the reduced-form model notation proposed by Doshi, el al. (2013), 1. and Et

Appendix B: DETAILS ABOUT THE SIMULATION MODEL. contained in lookup tables that are all calculated on an auxiliary spreadsheet.

CHAPTER 3 How to Calculate Present Values. Answers to Practice Questions

Introduction. Enterprises and background. chapter

Pricing Vulnerable American Options. April 16, Peter Klein. and. Jun (James) Yang. Simon Fraser University. Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6.

Option pricing and hedging in jump diffusion models

Lecture: Autonomous Financing and Financing Based on Market Values I

Forwards and Futures

Early Default Risk and Surrender Risk: Impacts on Participating Life Insurance Policies

If You Are No Longer Able to Work

Fundamental Basic. Fundamentals. Fundamental PV Principle. Time Value of Money. Fundamental. Chapter 2. How to Calculate Present Values

Valuing Real Options on Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Projects

Financial Econometrics Jeffrey R. Russell Midterm Winter 2011

1 Purpose of the paper

VALUATION OF THE AMERICAN-STYLE OF ASIAN OPTION BY A SOLUTION TO AN INTEGRAL EQUATION

Modeling of Tradeable Securities with Dividends

Acceleration Techniques for Life Cash Flow Projection Based on Many Interest Rates Scenarios Cash Flow Proxy Functions

Change of measure and Girsanov theorem

Evaluating Projects under Uncertainty

A UNIFIED PDE MODELLING FOR CVA AND FVA

HEDGING VOLATILITY RISK

Numerical probabalistic methods for high-dimensional problems in finance

Modern Valuation Techniques. Stuart Jarvis Frances Southall FIA Elliot Varnell

AN EASY METHOD TO PRICE QUANTO FORWARD CONTRACTS IN THE HJM MODEL WITH STOCHASTIC INTEREST RATES

Transcription:

A pricing model for he Guaraneed Lifelong Wihdrawal Benefi Opion Gabriella Piscopo Universià degli sudi di Napoli Federico II Diparimeno di Maemaica e Saisica

Index Main References Survey of he Variable Annuiy Producs and embedded opions Pricing model for GLWB opions Applicaion of he model o USA marke

Index Main References Survey of he Variable Annuiy Producs and embedded opions Pricing model for GLWB opions Applicaion of he model o USA marke

Main References Bauer D., Kling A., Russ J., 2008. A universal pricing framework for guaraneed minimum benefi in variable annuiies. ASIN Bullein 38 (2), 621-651 Boyle P.P, Schwarz E., 1977. Equilibrium prices of guaranees under equiy-linked conracs. Journal of Risk and Insurance 44 (2), 639-680 Clemens J., 2004. For a conservaive invesmen, variable annuiies are oo cosly. Wall Sree Journal C1, January 21 Dai M., Kwok Y.K., Zong J., 2008. Guaraneed minimum wihdrawal benefi in variable annuiies. Mahemaical Finance ( in press). Holz D., Kling A., Rub J., 2006. GMWB For Life. An Analysis of Lifelong Wihdrawal Guaranees. Working Paper ULM Universiy Milevsky M.A., Salisbury.S., 2006. Financial valuaion of guaraneed minimum wihdrawal benefis. Insurance: Mahemaics and Economics 38, 21-38

Index Main References Survey of he Variable Annuiy Producs and embedded opions Pricing model for GLWB opions Applicaion of he model o USA marke

Wha is a Variable Annuiy? As VAs are essenially a new produc class in he U.K., an indusry sandard definiion does no ye exis We shall define a VA as any uni-linked or manage fund vehicle wich offers opional guaranee benefis. ( Ledlie e al., 2008, Insiue of Acuaries, London) Uni Linked policy Embedded Opions Variable Annuiy

he embedded opions GMDB: he Guaraneed Minimum Deah Benefih opion guaranees a minimum reurn of he principal invesed upon he deah of he policyholder GMAB: he Guaraneed Minimum Accumulaion Benefih opion offers he policyholder a guaraneed minimum a mauriy if he is sill alive GMIB: he Guaraneed Minimum Income Benefih opion offers a minimum income sream from a specified fuure poin in ime. GMWB: he Guaraneed Minimum Wihdrawal Benefih opions gives he policyholder he possibiliy o wihdraw a pre-specified amoun annually unill he mauriy even if he fund value has fallen below his value.

Wha is a GLWB? he GLWB opion is a GMWB for Life opion: i offers a lifelong wihdrawal guaranee; herefore, here is no limi for he oal amoun ha is wihdrawn over he erm of he policy, because if he accoun value becomes zero while he insured is sill alive he can coninue o wihdraw he guaraneed amoun annually unil deah.

he aims of he work Develop a pricing model and define a fair price for he GLWB opion Verify if he curren GLWB price on he USA marke is fair or he marke seems o be underpriced or overpriced.

Index Main References Survey of he Variable Annuiy Producs and embedded opions Pricing model for GLWB opions Applicaion of he model o USA marke

he financial assumpion he single premium 0 paid by he policyholder is invesed in a fund. Following he sandard assumpion in he lieraure (Boyle and Schwarz 1997), we model he evoluion of he fund as: dw ( ) W d d W dz Where Z is a Brownian moion, he GLWB opion and approach where g is he guaraneed rae. is he insurance fee paid for is he wihdrawal a ime. In a saic G g0

he GLWB payoff he policyholder receives he amoun guaraneed unill he is sill alive; moreover, a he dae of deah he beneficiary will receive any remaining fund value. he discouned value a =0 of he GLWB V0 is he sum of he discouned values of living and deah benefis: V 0 LB0 DB0 LB 0 is he discouned value of a life annuiy. Since he random ime τ of deah and he fund value a his ime are independen DB 0 E E e r Max W ;0

he Deah Benefi (1) If we fix he dae, he deah benefi can be calculaed by Io s Lemma and rewrien as a payoff of a Quano Asian Pu (QAP) Opion: ;0 max 0 2 0 2 2 2 d e G e DB Z Z ;0 1 max 0 ) 2 ( 0 ) 2 ( 2 2 d e G G e DB Z Z

he Deah Benefi (2) Using a sandard echnique in lieraure, he No-arbirage imezero value of he deah benefi a ime is: where he expecaion is under he risk neural measure Q. If we do no fix he dae of deah and consider boh he expecaions: where x is he policyholder s age and n is he final age Q Z r Z r Q QAP E DB d e G G e E DB ) ( ;0 1 max ) ( 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 x n x x QAP E q p DB 0 0 0

he pricing formula he zero-value of he GLWB opion if he policyholder assumes a saic sraegy is: V n x r 0 pxge pxqxe0( QAP ) 0 Our main conribuion lies in bifurcaing he GLWB opion ino a life annuiy plus a porfolio of QAP opions wih decreasing srikes and increasing mauriies, where he weighs of composiion are he deferred probabiliies of deah

Index Main References Survey of he Variable Annuiy Producs and embedded opions Pricing model for GLWB opions Applicaion of he model o USA marke

Applicaion: he USA marke he guaraneed raes offered for GLWB opions are: Guaraneed Rae 0.05 60-69 0.06 70-79 0.07 80-85 Policyholder s age able 1: he guaraneed rae in he Usa Marke he average of he sub-accoun volailiy for he universe of VA producs is 0.18 (Morningsar Principia Pro) We use he laes USA moraliy able (Human Moraliy Daabase); we consider x=60 and n=110 We se and r 0. 05 0 100

he ruin probabiliy Le P(ξ ) he probabiliy ha W his zero a some poin < ω-x. We compue P(ξ ) wih Mone Carlo simulaions if g is 5% and he insurance fee is 60 b.p., which are hypohesis consisen wih he curren marke. P(ξ) μ = 4% μ = 6% μ = 8% μ = 10% μ = 12% σ = 10% 52.1% 45.1% 39.2% 30.9% 24,6% σ = 15% 58.5% 52.9% 48% 43.7% 39,5% σ = 18% 61.9% 57% 52.1% 48.1% 44,5% σ = 20% 64.3% 60% 54.9% 51% 48% able 1: he probabiliy ha he insurer has o pay he guaraneed amoun

Mone Carlo simulaion We have carried ou many Mone Carlo Simulaion under differen scenarios generaing for each of hem 1000 pahs of evoluion of he fund We have calculaed he fair insurance fee: once r, g and σ have been fixed we have searched he fair value of he fee making equal he iniial premium o he zero value of he fuure cash flows V 0.

Numerical Resuls Guaraneed Rae σ = 0.18 σ = 0.20 σ = 0.25 0.04 43 b.p. 54.5 b.p. 83 b.p. 0.05 79 b.p. 96.5 b.p. 138 b.p. 0.06 143 b.p. 167 b.p. 226 b.p. 0.07 270 b.p. 308 b.p. 389 b.p. able 3: he fair fees for a policyholder aged 60

Remarks We pay aenion o he fair insurance fee under he hypohesis g=5% and σ=18%, which are consisen wih he marke. In his case he fair insurance is equal o 79 b.p., whereas he curren marke fee ranges beween 60 b.p. and 70 b.p. Alhough here is a common belief ha he guaranees embedded in variable annuiy policies are overpriced (see Clemens (2004)), our analysis shows ha he USA marke of GLWB is underpriced, in line wih he resuls obained by Milevsky and Salisbury (2005) for he GMWB marke.

Furher Seps Dynamic Sraegy he policyholder can wihdraw more or less han G. We analyze wo cases: 1) o widraw less han G or an amoun equal o G 2) o wihdraw more han G

Furher Seps 1) In conras o a GMWB, for a GLWB wihdrawing nohing or less han G can never be opimal. In fac, for a GMWB his sraegy exends he life of guaranee; insead, in a GLWB here is a lifelong guaranee and no adjusmens are made for fuure guaraneed wihdrawals. Hence, when he policyholder wihdraws less han G, he fuure guaranees are he same, bu heir values F s are lower because W is greaer. In addiion, we have o consider ha wihdraw less han G involves a smaller LB and a greaer DB. However, due o he maringale propery of he fund process and he fee deduced from he accoun value, he expeced value of he addiional deah benefi is never greaer han he wihdrawal amoun. So, he raional policyholder wihdraws a leas G.

Furher Seps 2) In his case, we have o balance wo effec: on one hand, wihdraw more han G involves a greaer LB and a smaller D. However, due o he maringale propery of he fund process and he fee deduced from he accoun value, he expeced value of he decrease of he deah benefi is never greaer han he increase of he wihdrawal amoun. So, if i is opimal for he policyholder o wihdraw more han G, han i has o be opimal o wihdraw he mos i is possible, i.e. compleely surrender he conrac. hus, we have o define a decision rule in order o esablish he surrender ime: for each possible scenario he raional policyholder would wihdraw exacly he annual guaraneed amoun unil he value of he fund less he penaly exceeds he value of fuure benefis; hen, he would surrender he conrac.