COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF COLORADO 2 East 14 th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203

Similar documents
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11AP-266 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR )

In re the Marriage of: CYNTHIA JEAN VAN LEEUWEN, Petitioner/Appellant, RICHARD ALLEN VAN LEEUWEN, Respondent/Appellee. No.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIRST DISTRICT. Appellant, CASE NO. 1D vs. AHCA NO

ORDER AFFIRMED. Division VI Opinion by JUDGE HAWTHORNE Loeb and Lichtenstein, JJ., concur. Announced November 25, 2009

RUSSELL L. HALL, CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: CEB

STAND-UP MRI OF ORLANDO, CASE NO.: CVA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 22, 2005

Supreme Court of the State of New York Second Department Appellate Term 9th and 10th Judicial Districts Appellate Term

Case bjh11 Doc 168 Filed 12/20/18 Entered 12/20/18 12:51:25 Page 1 of 9

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY RULES OF PROCEDURE

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2017

Supreme Court of Florida

COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF COLORADO 101 West Colfax Ave., Suite 800 Denver, Colorado 80202

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CASE NO. 1D Roy W. Jordan, Jr., of Roy W. Jordan, Jr., P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

CA NOS , IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 15, 2004 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. January 2019 Term. No PENN VIRGINIA OPERATING CO., LLC, Petitioner Below, Petitioner

101 Central Plaza South, Ste. 600 Tzangas, Plakas, Mannos, & Raies

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. DCA Case No. 2D L.T. Case No CA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 16, 2010 Session

WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been submitted to the Board of Directors of the District for its consideration; and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC Fifth DCA Case No. 5D10-19, Lake County

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA. January 2001 Term. No

SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 KERRY WEST NO CA-0148 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SCIOTO COUNTY BRIEF OF APPELLANT C.D.

JUDGE WATSON'S NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OMNIBUS ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS DATED DECEMBER 20, 2013

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS.

Judgment Rendered October

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. EAGLE AIRCRAFT CORP. and CENTURION AVIATION COMPANY Petitioners, Case No DOR No.

BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE DECISION OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

In the Matter of Barbara Hertz vs. Morris County Agriculture Development Board SADC No. 699 OAL Docket No. ADC

1. Provide a copy of any document which Appellant has submitted since his removal from the Agency in search of employment.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 5D v. L.T. Case No.

Appellant/Cross-Appellee, CASE NO. 1D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. CASE NO.: 2D v. L.T. CASE NO.: 2D THE HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation,

JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Division I Opinion by JUDGE KAPELKE* Taubman and Bernard, JJ., concur. Announced February 3, 2011

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P : : : : : : : : :

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case No. 2018SC694. COLORADO SUPREME COURT 2 East 14th Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80203

STATE OF OHIO LASZLO KISS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO: SC v. THIRD DCA CASE NO.: 3D Lower Tribunal No.:

RESPONSE TO THE FEE EXAMINER S REPORT AND STATEMENT OF LIMITED OBJECTION TO THE THIRD INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OF KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS. Appeal of -- ) ) Allstate Products Company ) ASBCA No ) Under Contract No. DAKF06-96-D-0008 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC th DCA Case No. 5D

2014 CO 31. No. 12SC911, Western Logistics, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office Colorado Employment Security Act Employment Law.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC08- Lower Tribunal No. 3D BEATRICE PERAZA, Appellant, vs. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION,

COURT OF APPEALS PERRY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Peggy Hunt (6060) Gregory J. Adams (6159)

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 19, 2012

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

before September 1 following the date of notice of tax under RSA 72:1-d, to the

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

FEB 17 ZOiZ CLERK OF COURT SUPREMECOURT FOHBO FEH "L IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CASE NO IN RE:

LETTER OF BUDGET TRANSMITTAL. Division of Local Government 1313 Sherman Street, Room 521 Denver, Colorado 80203

CASE NO. 1D Melissa Montle and Seth E. Miller of Innocence Project of Florida, Inc., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

ALEXANDER HUNTING, CASE NO.: 2011-CV-50

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA COA

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO : 9/14/07

COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

mg Doc 3836 Filed 05/28/13 Entered 05/28/13 10:24:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 11

R. RUEL MORRISON. CASE NO R D E R. the record submitted herein and the report of the Hearing Dfficer, a copy

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY

v. CAUSE NUMBER: 2010-TS-00020

THE HANDBOOK OF THE LICENSE APPEAL COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO

Case 1:14-ml RLY-TAB Document 2659 Filed 09/23/16 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 7006

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

In the Supreme Court of Florida

WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been submitted to the Board of Directors of the District for its consideration; and

No. 07SA50, In re Stephen Compton v. Safeway, Inc. - Motion to compel discovery - Insurance claim investigation - Self-insured corporation

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

CASE NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS, TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF D. H.

STATE OF OHIO MIGUEL A. JIMENEZ

Agency: Denver Sheriff's Department, Department of Safety, and the City and County of Denver, a municipal corporation.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY. v. No CA ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

2014 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1

No COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 1979-NMCA-007, 92 N.M. 480, 590 P.2d 179 January 16, 1979 COUNSEL

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 12, 2014 Session

State of New Jersey OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : vs. : Released: June 1, 2006 : APPEARANCES:

COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2012 COA 160. Kyle W. Larson Enterprises, Inc., Roofing Experts, d/b/a The Roofing Experts,

PEGGY WARD CASE NO.: CVA LOWER COURT CASE NO.: 06-CC-3986 Appellant,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00062

Transcription:

COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF COLORADO 2 East 14 th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 Appeal from Board of Assessment Appeals, State of Colorado Presiding Judges Diane M. Devries and Amy J. Williams Case No. 59454 Petitioner/Appellant: WILLIAM L. COYLE, v. Respondent/Appellee: COLORADO STATE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, DIANE M. DEVRIES and AMY J. WILLIAMS, as members of said Board, DOUGLAS COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, DOUGLAS COUNTY ASSESSOR S OFFICE, TERI COX, as Douglas County Assessor, and VIRGINIA WOOD, as an employee of said Assessor's Office. EFILED Document CO Court of Appeals 13CA0907 Filing Date: May 17 2013 02:12PM MDT Transaction ID: 52347561 COURT USE ONLY Board of Assessment Appeals Case Number: 59454 Margaret R. Pflueger, #39780 Campbell Killin Brittan and Ray, LLC 270 St. Paul St., Ste. 270 Denver, CO 80206 Telephone: 303-394-7202 Facsimile: 303-322-5800 Email: mpflueger@ckbrlaw.com Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant NOTICE OF APPEAL

Petitioner/Appellant William L. Coyle ( Petitioner or Coyle ), through counsel, hereby submits the following Notice of Appeal pursuant to C.A.R. 3(b), 3(e) and the provisions of C.R.S. 24-4-106(11). I. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY INFORMATION Court: Board of Assessment Appeals, State of Colorado Presiding Judges: Diane M. Devries and Amy J. Williams Party Initiating Appeal: Petitioner William L. Coyle Board of Assessment Appeals Case No.: 59454 II. NATURE OF THE CASE A. Nature of Controversy Petitioner owns 33.861 acres of land owned located at 7800 Crowfoot Valley Road, Parker, CO 80134, Douglas County, Colorado (the Property ). The Property has been classified as agricultural for more than 30 years. Petitioner planted trees on the Property in the mid-1980s and installed a drip irrigation system to water the trees. Petitioner has utilized the Property as a tree farm consistently from the mid- 1980 s to the present. In 2012, Petitioner received notice from the Douglas County assessor s office of the removal of the Property s agricultural classification for tax year 2011, the 2

reclassification of the Property as residential, and the assignment of a value of $530,893 for the Property based on this new residential classification. Petitioner requested administrative review of the decision. The Douglas County Board of Equalization ( BOE ) upheld the assessor's reclassification of the Property and determination as to its value. Petitioner then timely filed an appeal of the BOE s decision with the Colorado State Board of Assessment Appeals ( Board of Assessment Appeals ). A hearing on Petitioner s appeal was conducted before the Board of Assessment Appeals on March 11, 2013. On April 5, 2013, the Board of Assessment Appeals issued an order denying Petitioner s appeal of the reclassification of the Property from agriculture to residential and the valuation of the Property based on residential standards. B. Order Being Appealed and Basis for the Appellate Court s Jurisdiction Petitioner is appealing the Board of Assessment Appeals April 5, 2013 Order ( April 5 th Order ) denying the Petitioner s appeal of the reclassification of the Property from agricultural to residential and the valuation of the Property using residential standards. The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over the Board of Assessment Appeals April 5th Order pursuant to provisions of C.R.S. 24-4-106. 3

C. Whether the Order Resolved All Issues Pending Before Trial Court Yes. D. Finality of Order The Board of Assessment Appeals April 5th Order is final for purposes of C.R.S. 24-4-106. E. Date of Order and Date of Service of Order April 5, 2013 F. Extensions for Filing Post-Trial Motions Not applicable. G. Date Motion for Post-Trial Relief Was Filed Not applicable. H. Date of Denial of Post-Trial Motions Not applicable. I. Extensions to File Notice of Appeal No extensions to file this Notice of Appeal have been sought or granted. III. ADVISORY LISTING OF ISSUES ON CROSS-APPEAL Petitioner/Appellant William D. Coyle may raise the following issues in his Appeal: 4

1. Whether the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in refusing to continue the hearing despite Petitioner s request. 2. Whether the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in admitting certain evidence offered by the BOE at the March 11, 2013 hearing despite the fact that the evidence was not timely submitted by the BOE in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act. 3. Whether the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in excluding photographs offered as evidence by Petitioner at the March 11, 2013 hearing. 4. Whether the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in permitting Virginia Wood, a Certified Residential Appraiser, to offer opinion testimony with regard to the health, maintenance and/or cultivation of tress located on the Property. 5. Whether there was sufficient evidence the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in denying Petitioner s appeal of the reclassification of his property from agricultural to residential. 6. Whether, because the Board of Assessment Appeals denial of the Petitioner s appeal of the reclassification of the Property from agricultural to residential was in error, its approval of the BOE s use of a market approach for purposes of valuation of the Property was also in error. 5

7. Whether the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in failing to consider evidence offered by the Petitioner regarding the income approach for purposes of valuation of the Property. 8. Whether the Board of Assessment Appeals erred in finding that the comparable sales and adjustments offered by the BOE accurately reflected the Property s value and that the BOE applied the appropriate methodology for valuing the Property. IV. TRANSCRIPT With regard to the issue raised in this Notice of Appeal, the transcript of the May 11, 2013 hearing is necessary. V. PRE-ARGUMENT CONFERENCE Petitioner/Appellant does not request a pre-argument conference. Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant is: Margaret R. Pflueger, #39780 Campbell Killin Brittan and Ray, LLC 270 St. Paul St., Ste. 270 Denver, CO 80206 Telephone: 303-394-7202 Facsimile: 303-322-5800 Email: mpflueger@ckbrlaw.com Counsel for Respondent/Appellee is: VI. COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES 6

Robert D. Clark Douglas County Attorney s Office 100 Third Street Castle Rock, CO 80104 Telephone: 303-660-7414 Facsimile: 303-688-6596 Email: attorney@douglas.co.us VII. APPENDIX TO THIS NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL Copy of the Board of Assessment Appeals April 5, 2013 Order. Respectfully submitted this 17 th day of May, 2013. CAMPBELL KILLIN BRITTAN AND RAY, LLC s/margaret R. Pflueger Margaret R. Pflueger, #39780 Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant William D. Coyle 7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 17 th day of May, 2013, a true and correct copy of the foregoing NOTICE OF APPEAL was delivered via Lexis/Nexis File and Serve to the following: Board of Assessment Appeals State of Colorado 1313 Sherman Street, Room 315 Denver, CO 80203 Robert D. Clark Douglas County Attorney s Office 100 Third Street Castle Rock, CO 80104 s/andrea Davis Andrea Davis 8