Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Similar documents
Guelph/Eramosa 2016 Budget Presentation. Thursday, February 18, 2016

The City of Owen Sound Asset Management Plan

2018 BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN

City of Markham Asset Management Plan

2016 Asset Management Plan

2017 ENTERPRISE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Town of Huntsville Municipal Asset Management Plan

Asset Management Plan

Asset Management Plan 2016 Township of King

TOWN OF COLLINGWOOD ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

Strategic Asset Management Policy

Building Better Parks: An Asset Management Plan for Parks

ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Year Tax Supported Capital Budget Forecast Investing In Welland

TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON 2017 BUDGET

MUNICIPALITY OF MISSISSIPPI MILLS. plan. December, 2016

Township of Melancthon Asset Management Plan

TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER / WASTEWATER JUNE WSP 100 Commerce Valley Drive West Thornhill, ON L3T 0A1

Comprehensive Reserve Fund Study and Building Condition Assessment for Wellington Standard Condominium Corporation No. 149

South Huron Asset Management Program. Spending the right amount of money, on the right assets, at the right time

The Three Planning Windows of Asset Management John Murray City of Hamilton May 9 th, 2012 CNAM - Montreal. Hamilton Asset Management Plan

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH GLENGARRY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Subject: Audited Reserves and Reserve Fund Balances for Paul Gandhi, Senior Financial Analyst, Finance and Infrastructure Services

TOWNSHIP OF CENTRE WELLINGTON

Asset Management Investment Plan

Village of Point Edward Asset Management Plan Page 1

Scope Criterium Engineers was hired to update a reserve study for the Reston Association. The specific tasks included: Review the previous study perfo

Building Detail and Buy-in For Your Long-Term Multi-Asset Investment Plan

ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d. 30 Saint Patrick Street, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON, M5T 3A3

THE DISTRICT OF MUSKOKA ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ROADS, BRIDGES, WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS

Reserve Fund Study My Condominium Plan

City of Welland. Comprehensive Asset Management Plan. GMBP File: January 13, Prepared By:

Asset Management Plan - Introduction

That the report from the Director of Finance regarding the Strategic Asset Management Policy, dated June 20, 2018, be received; and

RATE STUDY. Town of Midland. HEMSON C o n s u l t i n g L t d.

SURFSIDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION RESERVE STUDY LEVEL III: UPDATE WITH NO VISUAL SITE INSPECTION 2016

THE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CITY OF NIAGARA FALLS

AMP2016. i t r i g e s t. c o w w w. p u b l i c s e c t o r d i g e s t. c o m. The 2016 Asset Management Plan for the Township of Hamilton

Asset Management Plan

COUNTY OF LAMBTON ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2013

What Is Affecting The 2017 Budget

Norfolk County Asset Management Plan Roads

PW25. REPORT FOR ACTION

Bylaw No The Capital Reserve Bylaw. Codified to Bylaw No (December 18, 2017)

APPROVED CAPITAL BUDGET

PUBLIC MEETING DOCUMENTATION 2011 BUDGETS AND RATES

Asset Management Plan The Corporation of the Town of Wasaga Beach

MUNICIPALITY OF CHATHAM-KENT CORPORATE SERVICES

TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON 2018 BUDGET

CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. Meadow Wood Commons. City, State

2018 Asset Report Cards

2017 Draft Budget Presentation

2015 Budget. Public Works, Parks and Fleet Maintenance Departments

SUBJECT/REPORT NO: Ontario Ministry of Infrastructure Asset Management Plan Requirements (FCS13077/PW13077) (City Wide)

Instructions for Completing the Annual Road and Street Finance Report

The Corporation of the Municipality of Strathroy-Caradoc Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2017

BUDGET PRESENTATION DAY 2 - MAY 10, 2017

Connecting Risk and Levels of Service at the Region of Peel BY LEANNE BRANNIGAN, THE REGION OF PEEL

CITY OF ROSEBURG, OREGON TABLE OF CONTENTS ENTERPRISE FUNDS

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CORNWALL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FULL RESERVE STUDY FUNDING ANALYSIS PLAN Level I

metrovancouver METRO VANCOUVER FINANCIAL INFORMATION ACT FILING STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BROCK IN THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM 2019 CAPITAL BUDGET

TAX INCREMENT FINANCING (T.I.F.)

Draft Strategic Asset Management Plan

MUNICIPALITY OF ARRAN-ELDERSLIE CHESLEY DRINKING WATER SYSTEM FINANCIAL PLAN

2018 Budget Public Budget Consultation Meeting November 16 th, 2017

Overview of the 2016 Proposed Budget

The Corporation of the County of Prince Edward

Our Focus: Your Future

Building Markham s Future Together. Angus Glen Tennis Facility Budget. Community Consultation Meeting

Background. Request for Decision. Asset Management Plan. Resolution. Presented: Tuesday, Dec 13, Report Date Tuesday, Nov 29, 2016

PUBLIC WORKS $ 2,354,370 $ 2,247,370 $ 1,872,000 $ 375,370 $ 305,600 $ - $ 39,770 $ - $ 30,000 $

The 2018 Budget Table of Contents

PROPERTY RISK ENGINEERING IN THE CHEMICAL SECTOR. August 2016

21289 E. Lords Way Queen Creek, AZ Tel: (480) Fax: (888) October 27, Sample Association

Report to Committee of the Whole

MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT

Common budget and Forecast Terms

We want to hear from you! 2019 Financial Plan Feedback

Capital Asset Policy

SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BUDGET AMENDMENT ANALYSIS FISCAL YEAR

Reserves and Reserve Funds

Township of Essa. Asset Management Plan

Municipal Asset Management Plans

Asset Management Planning: Legislation & Integration

City of Vacaville FY 2017/2018 CIP Budget, General Plan Consistency and CEQA Review Parks and Recreation

Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)

Arizona Nevada Texas Utah New Mexico

Using Reserves and Reserve Fund Strategies to meet your challenging needs ahead!

2016 WATER SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT & 2017 OPERATING BUDGET

WATER ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

2015 Draft Budget. Budget Overview and Public Input February 12, 2015

City of Hartford Capital Improvement Program Share Total Project Cost. General Obligation Debt

INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOBAL Solution Partners, LLC - Toll free phone and fax: (844)

DRAFT CAPITAL RESERVE STUDY. The Piano Works Condominium Association. Deep River, Connecticut FOR THE. Project Number:

CITY OF WEYBURN GENERAL OPERATING FUND/ UTILITY FUND 2017 BUDGET

ASSET MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT PLAN

ACCOUNTING FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS

Transcription:

Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3 OVERVIEW 8 FACILITIES 12 FLEET 16 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 19 ROADWAYS 23 BRIDGES 26 WATER RELATED ASSETS

One of the goals outlined in the Township's strategic plan is financial stewardship. A key element of ensuring financial stewardship is through proper asset management. Achieving the goals of the municipality is dependent on sustainable infrastructure. An Asset Management Plan is developed for the management of the municipality's assets over the lifecycle of the assets to a specified level of service in the most cost-effective manner. The objective of Asset Management is to maximize benefits, manage risk and provide satisfactory levels of service to the public in a sustainable manner. The Asset Management Plan needs to identify a financial plan over the long term to ensure that sufficient monies are available. These monies provide the resources required to operate, rehabilitate and ultimately replace the asset at the optimal time with the intention of achieving the lowest lifecycle cost. An asset management plan incorporates the existing preventative maintenance and risk management programs to preclude the risk of failure. The implementation of an Asset Management Plan provides the municipality with a decision making tool to analyze new demands and deliver fiscally responsible options in an environmentally sustainable framework that supports preserving quality of life. There will be a correlation between an asset management plan and the municipality's other financial planning documents such as the annual budget and the long term capital plan. Benefits associated with an Asset Management Plan are: Facilitates the establishment and subsequent implementation of policy objectives and the related measurement of performance - Avoids problems and potential crises Provides better and consistent levels of service to the public Leads to more effective communications with ratepayers, elected officials and regulatory agencies Reduces life cycle costs Allows for better decision-making regarding resource allocation - Better management of risk to the municipality - Allows for more effective financial planning Leads to more efficient data management 3

The municipality utilizes its various tangible capital assets in the delivery of services. In becoming PASB 3150 compliant, an asset inventory was compiled. The municipality's assets are grouped into six classes. These classes with components, where applicable, are: LAND LAND IMPROVEMENTS - Multi-use pads - Trails - Sports Fields - Parking Lots - Fencing - Landscaping FACILITIES FLEET EQUIPMENT Playground Equipment Communication Equipment - Computer Hardware/Software Streetlights Generators Water Monitoring Equipment Other INFRASTRUCTURE Water Mains Roads Surfaces Roads Sub-surfaces Dry Hydrants Bridges - Reservoirs - Dock/Wharves - Wells Septic systems - Retaining Walls Guard Rails Storm Management Ponds - Culverts - Drains/Storm sewers 4

The municipality has developed replacement schedules for some assets. These replacement schedules have been determined based on the following assumptions: Assets will be replaced at the end of their useful lives Replacement cost will increase by an annual inflation factor of 2% Each Asset in class or subclass will be replaced at least once during the span of replacement schedule. As such, replacement schedules can be for a period of 20 to 80 years. Assets for which replacement schedules have been completed and as such asset management plans are included herein are: Facilities Fleet Playground Equipment Road Surfaces and Sub-surfaces Bridges In April, 2010, Council approved a long-term financial plan for water system related assets. Water systems are financed from user fees rather than property taxes. A separate reserve is maintained to finance the replacement of water system related assets. For these reasons, water related assets are considered jointly in the Asset Management Plan. As replacement schedules are completed for other assets, asset management plans for those assets will be developed accordingly. It should be noted that the asset management plans presented herein relate to over 90% of the net book value of the municipality's total assets. The municipality has established reserves to finance replacement of non-water related assets. A reserve exists for each class of asset outlined above. An annual contribution is made to each of these reserves to ensure funds are available to finance asset replacement. The adequacy of these annual contributions is discussed in each of the subsequent sections of the asset management plan and a financing strategy considered addressing any funding shortfalls. The municipality also maintains a budget stabilization reserve. Funds from this reserve are utilized to fund unforeseen major repairs or premature replacement of assets. The Township's policy is to maintain a balance for this reserve of 10% to 15% of the annual tax levy. 5

The municipality is aware that in some instances asset replacement or rehabilitation will require the issuance of debt. Debt levels have been managed in such a manner as to ensure flexibility exists if and when debt issuance may be required. The measures above address the financing of asset replacement or rehabilitation. Funds must also be expended annually for repair and maintenance of assets to maintain the condition of the assets so that they can deliver the level of service intended and maximize the life cycle of the assets. The municipality's annual budget provides allocations for repair and maintenance costs for all of the municipality's assets. There is a need to determine the relationship between the level of repair and maintenance investment to the asset condition and the asset's ability to deliver the intended level of service. Documenting and tracking annual costs for repairs becomes key in assessing asset condition. The municipality presently tracks costs related to repair and maintenance on an annual basis but must consider acquiring software to track the nature of the repair and maintenance over time on an asset by asset basis. This information will be essential in assessing asset condition and precluding the risk of asset failure. A key element of asset management is the assessment of risk. Risk is the chance of an event that will positively or negatively impact the achievement of objectives. Risk has been defined as: Probability of failure x consequence of failure Risk should be managed in any decision making process. As part of its emergency planning, the municipality has identified critical infrastructure as being those that would have the most significant impact on the municipality's ability to deliver services in the event of asset failure. A methodology is needed to identify where the most cost effective risk reductions lie, how to identify the true level of additional risk that an asset is imparting and what amount of risk can be mitigated. 6

The following levels of risk can exist in relation to any asset: Inherent Risk: The level of risk that the asset presents to the service before undertaking any mitigation measures. Inherent risk can also indicate the most critical assets to the quality of service delivery. (unmitigated risk) Residual Risk: The remaining risk after desired mitigation measures are put into effect. Mitigation measures include achieving the levels of service at which the assets need to perform, undertaking proactive maintenance practices, adhering to regulatory requirements, or enacting service improvement objectives. Residual risk is often the organization's risk objective. (mitigated risk) Current Risk: The level of risk the assets currently present to service delivery. The current risk is calculated based on how well the organization is meeting its levels of service, regulatory requirements, maintenance practices and service improvement objectives today. (today's risk) The gap between Residual Risk and Current Risk represents the unmet asset needs. The range between the Residual Risk and Inherent risk measures become directly linked to the range between the asset level of service requirements and the asset failure point. Both asset condition and performance Technical Level of Service (TLOS) are used to assess the state of the assets and are combined to provide overall asset risk values. Condition and performance TLOS provide the basis for strategic planning purposes. In recent years, the municipality's annual budget has been presented such that services that are being delivered are identified and costs required in the delivery of those services quantified. As this budget process evolves, key performance indicators will be established for each service. As stated previously, the municipality's assets are utilized in the delivery of various services. As such, TLOS should be established for the municipality's assets. TLOS are defined as the condition and performance thresholds at which assets should be maintained to cost effectively manage service risks and meet customer service expectations. The development of TLOS, a methodology for risk assessment and rating condition of assets will occur as the municipality's asset management program continues to evolve. The asset management plans contained herein will continue to be enhanced as the above are developed. Asset management plans are living documents that must constantly be revised to reflect changes in asset inventory, asset conditions, risk tolerance and service expectations. 7

Thwnship of Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FACILITIES

INVENTORY As of December 31, 2015, The Township of Oro-Medonte's facilities consist of 34 units that are utilized in the provision of municipal services. These facilities can be categorized as follows: Administration Centre 1 Fire Halls 6 OPP Substation/Nurse Practioner Clinic 1 Public Works Depots/ Salt/Sand Domes 4 Arena/Community Centre 1 Community Halls 6 Storage-Buildings 5- Picnic Pavilions /Shelters 7 Change room / Washrooms 3 Total 34 LIFE EXPECTANCY As part of Oro-Medonte's asset inventory compilation, useful life of facilities was determined through discussion with senior managers and comparison to other municipalities. Useful life of the Township's facilities was determined to be 50 years. CONDITION ASSESSMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte will determine asset condition based on remaining useful life of the asset. As the asset management process evolves, a condition rating system will be developed. 9

As such, the condition of the municipality's facilities can be summarized as follows: No useful life remaining 3 0.01% to 20% useful life remaining 0 20.01% to 40% useful life remaining 8 40.01% to 60% useful life remaining 9 60.01% to 80% useful life remaining 9 80.01% to 100% useful life remaining 5 Total 34 The average useful life remaining is 52.56%. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Periodic visual inspections are undertaken. For facilities with public occupancy, a structural inspection is conducted every five years in the later stages of the asset's lifecycle. FACILITY MAINTENANCE RESERVE The municipality recognizes that during the lifecycle of the facilities, significant repairs or rehabilitation will occur such as roof or window replacement. As such, the municipality allocates $100,000 annually to a facility Maintenance Reserve to finance these significant costs as they occur. 10

FINANCING ASSET REPLACEMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte maintains a facility replacement reserve to finance asset replacement. An annual contribution is made to the reserve to ensure sufficient funds are available when replacement of facilities is required. The adequacy of the annual contribution is assessed below: Estimated replacement cost of assets 2016-2064 $34,203,571 Reserve balance at 2015/12/31 $ 1,463,037 $32,740,534 Annual contribution to reserve required $ 682,094 Current annual contribution to reserve $ 450,000 Annual Contribution Shortfall $ 232,084 Current annual contribution as % of required contribution 65.97% Financing Strategy: Contribution to reserve will increase annually by $25,000 until funding shortfall has been eliminated. 11

Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN FLEET 12

INVENTORY As of December 31, 2015, The Township of Oro-Medonte's fleet consists of 70 units that are utilized in the provision of municipal services. These vehicles can be categorized as follows: Light Truck/Passenger Vehicles 23 Heavy trucks 14 Equipment (graders, loaders, backhoes, sweepers) 13 Ice resurfacer 1 Airboat -1- Fire/Emergency vehicles 18 Total 70 LIFE EXPECTANCY As part of Oro-Medonte's asset inventory compilation, useful life of vehicles was determined through discussion with senior managers and comparison to other municipalities. Useful life of the Township's vehicles is as follows: Light Truck/Passenger Vehicles 5 to 7 years Heavy trucks 12 years Equipment (graders, loaders, backhoes, sweepers) 20 years Ice resurfacer 10 years Airboat 20 years Fire/Emergency vehicles 20 years 13

CONDITION ASSESSMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte will determine asset condition based on remaining useful life of the asset. As the asset management process evolves, a condition rating system will be developed. As such, the condition of the municipality's fleet can be summarized as follows: No useful life remaining 13 0.01% to 20% useful life remaining 9 20.01% to 40% useful life remaining 9 40.01% to 60% useful life remaining 12 60.01% to 80% useful life remaining 15 80.01% to 100% useful life remaining 12 Total 70 The average useful life remaining is 43.87%. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Regular maintenance is undertaken. Annual safety inspections are conducted. Remedial action is taken as required. 14

FINANCING ASSET REPLACEMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte maintains a vehicle replacement reserve to finance asset replacement. An annual contribution is made to the reserve to ensure sufficient funds are available when replacement of vehicles is required. The adequacy of the annual contribution is assessed below: Estimated replacement cost of assets 2016-2034 $13,987,296 Reserve balance at 2015/12/31 $ 1,596,773 $12,384,523 Annual contribution to reserve required $ 651,817 Current annual contribution to reserve $ 612,400 Annual Contribution Shortfall $ 39,417 Current contribution as % of required contribution 93.95% Financing Strategy: Contribution to reserve will increase annually by $30,000 until funding shortfall has been eliminated. 15

7Zplof Proud Heritage, Exciting Future AS SET MANAGEMENT PLAN PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 16

INVENTORY As of December 31, 2015, the Township of Oro-Medonte's has 14 sets of playground equipment located throughout the municipality. LIFE EXPECTANCY As part of Oro-Medonte's asset inventory compilation, useful life of facilities was determined through discussion with senior managers and comparison to other municipalities. Useful life of the Township's facilities was determined to be 20 years. CONDITION ASSESSMENT The Townsh-ip of Oro-Medonte will determine asset condition based on remaining useful life of the asset. As the asset management process evolves, a condition rating system will be developed. As such, the condition of the municipality's facilities can be summarized as follows: No useful life remaining 2 0.01% to 20% useful life remaining 1 20.01% to 40% useful life remaining 1 40.01% to 60% useful life remaining 4 60.01% to 80% useful life remaining 4 80.01% to 100% useful life remaining 2 Total 14 The average useful life remaining is 51.88%. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Weekly visual inspections are conducted (except during off season). Remedial action is taken as required. 17

FINANCING ASSET REPLACEMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte maintains an equipment replacement reserve to finance asset replacement. This reserve has a playground equipment component. An annual contribution is made to this component of the reserve to ensure sufficient funds are available when replacement of playground equipment is required. The adequacy of the annual contribution is assessed below: Estimated replacement cost of assets 2016-2036 $891,182 Reserve balance as at 2015/12/31 $ 84,000 $807,182 Annual contribution to reserve required $ 38,437 Current annual contribution $ 30,000 Annual Contribution shortfall $ 8,437 Current annual contribution as % of required contribution 78.05% Financing Strategy Contribution to reserve will increase annually by $1,000 until funding shortfall has been eliminated. 18

shipof Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN ROADWAYS

INVENTORY The Township's road infrastructure is divided into the following components: Road Surface Road Subsurface As of December 31, 2015 the Township's road surface inventory consisted of the following: Kilometers Asphalt 472.083 Concrete 1.542 Gravel 20.317 Surface treated 94.951 Total 588.893 As of December 31, 2015 the Township's road subsurface inventory totaled 563.829 kilometers. LIFE EXPECTANCY As part of Oro-Medonte's asset inventory compilation, useful life of roadways was determined through discussion with senior managers and comparison to other municipalities. Useful life of the Township's roadways is: Surface 15 years Subsurface 40 years CONDITION ASSESSMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte will determine asset condition based on remaining useful life of the asset. As the asset management process evolves, a condition rating system will be developed. As such, the condition of the municipality's roadways can be summarized as follows. 20

Road Surface: Kilometers No useful life remaining 185.927 0.01% to 20% useful life remaining 60.427 20.01% to 40% useful life remaining 44.844 40.01% to 60% useful life remaining 169.244 60.01% to 80% useful life remaining 85.951 80.01% to 100% useful life remaining 42.500 Total 588.893 The average useful-life remaining is 29.27%. Road Subsurface: Kilometers No useful life remaining 258.021 0.01% to 20% useful life remaining 69.693 20.01% to 40% useful life remaining 36.147 40.01% to 60% useful life remaining 42.933 60.01% to 80% useful life remaining 90.021 80.01% to 100% useful life remaining 67.014 Total 563.829 The average useful life remaining is 33.57%. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Road surfaces are inspected on a periodic basis. Maintenance activities such as crack sealing and hot and cold mix patching are undertaken to address any deficiencies identified. 21

The above measures, as well as addressing drainage issues as required, contributes to maximizing the useful life of road subsurfaces. FINANCING ASSET REPLACEMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte finances the replacement of road infrastructure from the following sources of revenue: Tax levy $1,227,700 Federal gas tax allocation $ 610,435 Gravel royalties $140,000 Total $1,978,135 The adequacy of the annual contribution is assessed below: Roātl Surfaces Capital requirement 2016-2030 $39,583,352 Annual funding required $2,638,890 Road subsurface Capital requirement 2016-2055 $56,530,685 Annual funding required $1,413,267 $4,052,157 Total current annual funding $1,978,135 Annual Funding shortfall $2,074,022 Current annual funding as % of required funding 51.18% Financing Strategy: The municipality will continue its current annual dedicated tax increase of 1% relating to road infrastructure. As debt charges related to road infrastructure expire, funds no longer required for debt charges will be re-allocated to road infrastructure replacement. 22

Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN BRIDGES

INVENTORY As of December 31, 2015, The Township of Oro-Medonte's inventory of bridges consists of 22 structures. LIFE EXPECTANCY As part of Oro-Medonte's asset inventory compilation, useful life of bridges was determined through discussion with senior managers and comparison to other municipalities. Useful life of the Township's vehicles was determined to be 60 years. CONDITION ASSESSMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte will determine asset condition based on remaining useful life of _the acset_as_th_e_asse_t_management process-evolve-s,a-condition-eating-system-will-be- - developed. As such, the condition of the municipality's bridges can be summarized as follows: No useful life remaining 15 0.01% to 20% useful life remaining 2 20.01% to 40% useful life remaining 1 40.01% to 60% useful life remaining 1 60.01% to 80% useful life remaining 3 80.01% to 100% useful life remaining 0 Total 22 The average useful life remaining is 14.86%. 24

LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Provincial legislation requires that an inspection of each structure be conducted by a qualified engineer every other year. Any identified deficiencies are remedied in a prompt manner. Periodic inspections are conducted by Township staff for possible signs of deterioration. FINANCING ASSET REPLACEMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte maintains a bridge replacement reserve to finance asset replacement. An annual contribution is made to the reserve to ensure sufficient funds are available when replacement of bridges is required. The adequacy of the annual contribution is assessed below: Estimated replacement cost of assets 2016-2063 $ 43,703,242 Reserve balance at 2015/12/31 $ 893,002 $ 42,810,240 Annual contribution to reserve required $ 891,880 Current annual contribution to reserve $ 225,000 Annual Contribution Shortfall $ 666,880 Current annual contribution as % of required contribution 25.23% Financing Strategy: Contribution to reserve will increase annually by $25,000 until funding shortfall has been eliminated. 25

Township of Proud Heritage, Exciting Future ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER RELATED ASSETS

INVENTORY As of December 31, 2015, the Township of Oro-Medonte's water related assets that are utilized in the provision of municipal services consists of the following: Wells 24 Chlorine Contact Mains 6 Services Lines 1,218 Distribution Pipe 53,679 M Hydrants 155 Buildings: Pumphouses 13 Booster Stations 3 Water Tower 1 Vehicles 5 Ha rdwa re/softwa re: Programmable Logic Controller 12 Meter Reader 1 DWQMS software 1 Generators 12 Water Monitoring Equipment: Analyzers 12 Chemical Feed System 1 Magnetic Flow Meter 11 Well Level Meter 9 Reservoirs 10 Pumps 23 27

LIFE EXPECTANCY As part of Oro-Medonte's asset inventory compilation, useful life of assets was determined through discussion with senior managers and comparison to other municipalities. Useful life of water related assets was determined to be as follows: Wells 50 years Chlorine Contact mains 80 years Service Lines 80 years Water Mains 80 years Hydrants 80 years Buildings 50 years Vehicles 5 to 7 years Hardware/Software 10 years Generators 25 years Water Monitoring equipment 25 years Pumps 25 years Storage container 20 years Reservoirs 50 years CONDITION ASSESSMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte will determine asset condition based on remaining useful life of the asset. As the asset management process evolves, a condition rating system will be developed. As such, the condition of the municipality's water related assets can be summarized as follows: 28

USEFUL LIFE REMAINING Average 0.01% 20.01 60.01 useful to % to % to 80.01 life Non 20.00 40.00 40.01% to 80.00 % to remainin e % % 60.00% % 100% Total g Wells 6 3 8 4 3 24 46.43% Chlorine Contact Mains 1 5 6 81.04% Service Lines 89 738 391 1218 83.46% 24535 15091 53679 Water Mains 14053 M M M 1 M 73.55% Hydrants 105 50 155 83.84% Buildings 2 4 4 4 3 17 52.04% Vehicles 2 1 0 1 1 5 40.95% Hardware/Softwar e 10 2 2 14 15.71% Generators 8 3 1 12 65.78% Water Monitoring Equipment 30 3 33 48.12% Pumps 1 2 7 1 12 23 68.10% Reservoirs 1 2 3 1 3 10 58.47% 29

LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT Wells: A video inspection is undertaken every ten years. Remedial action is taken as required. Water Mains: Regular flushing of mains is performed. Hydrants: Regular annual maintenance is performed. Remedial action is taken as required. Pumphouses, Reservoirs, Booster Stations: Periodie-visual-inspeetions are-undertaken - - Generators: Maintenance inspections are undertaken every six months. Remedial action is undertaken as required. Pumps: A flow test is conducted every ten years. Flow rates are monitored and declining rates followed up upon. Vehicles: Regular maintenance is undertaken. Annual safety inspections are conducted. 30

FINANCING ASSET REPLACEMENT The Township of Oro-Medonte maintains a water infrastructure renewal reserve to finance asset replacement. An annual contribution is made to this reserve from funds generated from the imposition of a water infrastructure renewal fee to ensure sufficient funds are available when replacement of water related assets is required. The adequacy of the annual contribution is assessed below: Estimated replacement cost of assets 2016-2096 $108,621,726 Reserve balance as at 2015/12/31 $ 3,063,785 $105,557,941 Annual contribution to reserve required $ 1,303,185 Cūrrent-annual-contribution -5-30,619- Annual contribution shortfall $ 772,566 Current annual contribution as % of required contribution 40.72% Financing Strategy: The water infrastructure renewal fee will be increased annually by $6 as outline in the Water Systems Financial Plan prepared in March, 2011. 31