Zoom microfinance. Refinancing guarantees: calculated risks on behalf of small rural farmers. A model based on the use of intermediaries

Similar documents
Zoom microfinance. Overview. Advantages and disadvantages of the different financial actors. Strategies to increase the scope of financial services

A FINANCIAL TOOL FOR AGRICULTURE IN LATIN. Wilfredo Necochea President of FOGAL

September. EMN POLICY NOTE on the EMN Overview of the Microcredit Sector in the European Union

An ethical investment with financial and social performance

Building partnerships between fair trade and rural micro-finance

Republic of Djibouti. President s memorandum. Microfinance and Microenterprise Development Project. Amendment to the loan agreement

Francesco Rispoli, IFAD, Italy

EVALUATIONS OF MICROFINANCE PROGRAMS

Loans for rural development , Estonia. Case Study. - EAFRD - EUR 36 million - Rural enterprise support - Estonia

EN 1 EN. Annex. Sector Policy Support Programme: Sector budget support (centralised management) DAC-code Sector Trade related adjustments

Characteristics and Tendencies of the Market of Microfinance Suppliers in Nicaragua

Draft COMMISSION DECISION

MicroBank. Facilitating the access to microfinance

Ex post evaluation Pakistan

Understanding Rural Finance Issues and the Macro and Micro Operating Environment. Module 2 Rural Finance & Microfinance Actors and approaches

WSBI s contribution to the Consultation of the Basel Committee on Microfinance activities and the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision

Venture capital for the development of your institution. Luxembourg Microfinance

Title: Rabobank in developing countries Toon Bullens Number: 22

DEVELOPMENTS OF MICROFINANCE IN WEST AFRICA AND TRENDS FOR THE DECADE. I Brief introduction to the microfinance sector in West Africa

The Revolution of Peer to Peer Lending in Microfinance

Rural and Agricultural Finance: Emerging Practices from Peruvian Financial Institutions. A. Introduction

the 12 th EMN Annual Conference Microfinance and banks: Are we the right partners?

The DAC s main findings and recommendations. Extract from: OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews

advancing with ESIF financial instruments Financial instruments working with personal loans

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities DG DRAFT NOTE ON

BancoEstado. Social Bond Framework

The Strategy for Development of the. Microfinance Sector in Sudan. A Central Bank Initiative

Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka. Smallholder Agribusiness Partnerships (SAP) Programme. Negotiated financing agreement

International Agricultural and Natural Catastrophe Insurance Forum. Experience by GIZ Matthias Range

6 th FIVE YEAR PLAN ( ) HIGHLIGHTS

President s report. Proposed loan to the Republic of Mali for the. Rural Microfinance Programme

Rikolto vzw/asbl. Financial Support: Volunteers in Belgium. Blijde Inkomststraat /

1BSUOFST GPS %FWFMPQNFOU T "QQSPBDI UP.JDSPöOBODF

Ex post evaluation Georgia

Update on the design of the Smallholder and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Investment Finance Fund (SIF) at IFAD

Session C Ownership and Alignment. Gender responsive Budgets in Morocco: illustration of the Paris Declaration Alignment and Ownership principles

Financial Instrument for Fisheries and Aquaculture , Estonia

ANNUAL REPORT

Financing Small Scale Irrigation in Sub-Sahara. Sahara Africa. Key Results from the Kenya Case Study. Wolfgang Hannover Washington DC, 1 March 2007

Strategy for Establishment of the Smallholder and SME Investment Finance (SIF) Fund

COMMODITY RISK MANAGEMENT IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES:

TRAINING CATALOGUE ON IMPACT INSURANCE Building practitioner skills in providing valuable and viable insurance products

Ex Post-Evaluation Brief SENEGAL: Supply of credit to promote the development of the financial system - SME upgrading

Evaluation of Budget Support Operations in Morocco. Summary. July Development and Cooperation EuropeAid

Ex Post-Evaluation Brief MOZAMBIQUE: Rural Microfinance Bank

Microfinance Institutions Ratings

Job creation: Progress Microfinance implementation report frequently asked questions

Achieve financial performance through ethical investments

Food security and linking relief, rehabilitation and development in the European Commission

The excellent results achieved by Belfius in 2015 validate its customer satisfaction strategy

Benchmarking Microfinance in Romania

Our Vision Secure and equitable access to and control over land reduces poverty and contribute to identity, dignity and inclusion

MEMO. Why a European promotion policy for agricultural products?

European Progress Microfinance Facility for employment and social inclusion - MICROCREDIT COUNTER-GUARANTEES -

Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) Initiative East

Evaluation of the European Union's Cooperation with Bolivia. Summary. December 15, Development and Cooperation EuropeAid

State policies are converging in this direction and in this context, access to capital is one of the paramount conditions:

- ESF - EUR 14.5 million - Loan + training - SME - Lithuania. Entrepreneurship Promotion Fund (EPF) sustainable business.

THE MICROFINANCE SECTOR IN CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC. February 2005

European Development Fund Procedures - A Guide. By Dr C. Manyeruke. TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES CENTRE Harare, Zimbabwe

YES NO NOT SURE NOT APPLICABLE MOST IMPORTANT IMPORTANT. 1.2 If YES, please rate the importance of the following driving forces behind these changes:

Impact analysis summary

Ex Post-Evaluation Brief Democratic Republic of the Congo: ProCredit Bank Congo (Fiduciary Holding)

EQUITY PARTNERSHIP TRUST

Joint IFI/DFI Action Plan to Respond to the Financial Crisis in Africa

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

2018/SMEWG/DIA/008 National Financial Inclusion Strategy

YES NO NOT SURE NOT APPLICABLE MOST IMPORTANT IMPORTANT. 1.2 If YES, please rate the importance of the following driving forces behind these changes:

BRINGING FINANCE TO RURAL PEOPLE MACEDONIA S CASE

Al-Amal Microfinance Bank

Briefing Paper. Social Policies. Fiscal space and public spending for children in Senegal. social protection. inequality. social exclusion.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

ECUADOR. 1. General trends

Rural Development Programmes. Financial Instruments: making funding go further

Central Bank of Sudan Microfinance Unit

Proposed Luxembourg-WHO collaboration: Supporting policy dialogue on national health policies, strategies and plans in West Africa

Zeti Akhtar Aziz: Strategic positioning in a changing environment

Ex Post-Evaluation Brief INDIA: Microfinance Facility

The main objectives of the eu rural development policy for

We seek to assist our partners, without substituting them in their efforts to progress. To this end, our agency develops its skills in different

Productive Accompanying Measures to Safety Nets in the Sahel ASP Program: the case of Niger

BANKING WITH THE POOR

CARE GLOBAL VSLA REACH 2017 AN OVERVIEW OF THE GLOBAL REACH OF CARE S VILLAGE SAVINGS AND LOANS ASSOCIATION PROGRAMING

IFC Trust Funds Trust Fund Annual Report. Overall Trends. its standard-setting, and its work to promote a business-enabling environment.

PROPARCO MARKS 40 TH ANNIVERSARY BY ADOPTING A NEW STRATEGY FOR ACTION AND SCALING UP OBJECTIVE 2020

Leader approach and local development strategies in Slovenia

Survey on the Access to Finance of Enterprises in the euro area. April to September 2017

Simplify the management and administrative processes of the programme; Mainstream / simplify the structure of the programme.

Overview. Financial Systems approach to microfinance Basic roles and functions of government and donors at various points within the financial sector

What funding for EU external action after 2013?

Screening report. Serbia

Oikocredit International Support Foundation Plans, Objectives and Activities for the period 2014 to 2018

Financing Natura 2000

Micro Insurance Management by Mutual Health Organizations Operational issues

CREATING PERMANENT LINKS BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE

TREATY ESTABLISHING THE LATIN AMERICAN INTEGRATION ASSOCIATION (LAIA) * [excerpts]

Infrastructure Development Fund

PRI REPORTING FRAMEWORK 2018 Direct Inclusive Finance

Warsaw Stock Exchange Strategy

Labour. Overview Latin America and the Caribbean. Executive Summary. ILO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean

Transcription:

October 2009 n 28 Zoom microfinance Refinancing guarantees: calculated risks on behalf of small rural farmers A model based on the use of intermediaries Various partners Recent development: encouraging growth Social aspects of FOGAL s success A measure of FOGAL s impact In 1992, SOS FAIM, a Belgian development NGO took the initiative of creating a loan guarantee fund for Latin America. Initially, this program aimed to facilitate locally sourced financing for SOS Faim s southern partners, by providing first class guarantees, which would be acceptable to commercial banks. The times were characterised by the widespread withdrawal of the state: the dismantling of many development banks and the implementation of structural adjustment programmes that had been imposed by international institutions. The partners for whom the international guarantee fund was designed were both rural farmers associations in need of working capital (for collecting and / or marketing produce) and micro finance institutions that required additional funds in order to serve a larger number of farmer and micro entrepreneur clients.??? A model based on the use of intermediaries Originally, this innovative fund managed by SOS Faim was established with contributions from the Belgian public, the Belgian government s development arm (Directorate-General for Development Cooperation) and the European Commission. After a little over 10 years of direct management by SOS Faim, the challenge was taken up of incorporating the fund. In 2004, with the agreement of the fund s original donors, a non-profit entity based in Lima (Peru) was established to take over control, called FOGAL. With its prior experience and with a view to ensuring continuity of mission and vision, SOS Faim got involved in this new association, which was created in partnership with a cooperative of rural farmers

p 2 Zoom microfinance n 28 october 2009 (La Florida, Peru) and a microfinance institution (CEPE- SIU, Ecuador). FOGAL uses intermediaries for its guarantees. The diagram below shows the main actors, their relationships and the roles played by each in a guarantee operation Offer an International Guarantee European Banks Request a Guarantee Local Banks or European Social Investor Information Exchange FOGAL Credit In this model, it is clear that the quality of the selected intermediary (FOGAL s partner) is of fundamental importance. The intermediary organisation, using an appropriate methodology, manages the selection of end customers, and is in charge of monitoring and recovering loans. The intermediary is also responsible for obtaining the loan from the financial entity that benefits from the guarantee issued, at the request of FOGAL, by the bank which holds the guarantee fund s assets 1. Client Member Credit or Advance Intermediary Partnership In all cases, the model is designed to enable people excluded from the formal banking system to gain access to sustainable and timely financial services. In the intermediary selection process great importance is attributed to the institutional strength and dynamic of the candidates. In addition, where farmer organisations are concerned, representation and social issues are also subject to scrutiny. 1: FOGAL s assets are mostly held in a European bank for security reasons but also to facilitate the international acceptance of the letters of guarantee. The model is designed to enable people excluded from the formal banking system to gain access to sustainable and timely financial services Various partners FOGAL establishes partnerships either with rural farmers associations or with micro finance institutions (MFIs). From 2005 to 2008, during the first four years following the incorporation of the fund, the number of partners rose from 18 to 30. They are spread across 3 Andean countries: Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. When working with MFIs, the guarantee fund has set a maximum ceiling for its loan portfolio of 5 million dollars. FOGAL mainly aims at relatively young MFIs, which, however, are in the process of consolidating. How accessible the MFI is to the rural sector and its willingness to work with organised groups are also positive selection criteria of. In 2008, FOGAL worked with 18 MFIs (7 savings & loans cooperatives and 11 foundations or NGOs) in the 3 Andean countries where it currently operates. Furthermore, FOGAL has worked with 12 farmers organisations, mainly in export related sectors: coffee, cocoa and bananas. All of these organisations are engaged in the fair trade movement and organic production processes or transitioning to organic farming. These organisations are involved in sustainable development as they exhibit both a desire to preserve the environment and create a sustainable approach to business (the search for niche markets that ensure their products sell at an attractive price) and social concerns (cooperative or associative approach). Recent development: encouraging growth Since its incorporation, guarantees issued by FOGAL have increased from US$ 1,422,500 to US$ 2,851,000. These are the figures from the year-end accounts on 31st December 2008. They show an increase of over 100%. Meanwhile, credit lines opened with these guarantees rose from US$ 2.902.914 to US$ 7,566,000 (a multiple of 2.6).

p 3 Loans enable farmers to diversify production. Laurent BIOT - SOS Faim The following graph illustrates this growth over the last 4 years of operation. In 2008, the average leverage effect on the guarantees given was 2.65, a 31% increase over 2007. This growth was achieved thanks to collaborations with European social investors such as ALTERFIN and ETIMOS (who «offer» leverage multiples of up to 3 or 4) and with the Micro Enterprise Support Programme (PAME) run by Banco de la Nación, in Peru (which offers a leverage multiple of 10). On the other hand, it is still very difficult to obtain a real leverage effect from local commercial banks (credit amounts to 120% of the guarantee at best). In these situations, the advantage often is the availability of a more favourable rate of interest. Growth of guaranties and loans 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 In $ 1,000,000 0 2005 Credits Garantees 2006 2007 2008

p 4 Zoom microfinance n 28 october 2009 Collaboration with local banks (about 52% of the portfolio) and solidarity funding entities from the North 2 (48%) is relatively balanced. Choices are based on a number of criteria: the interest rate, the size of the required guarantee, the opportunity costs... For FOGAL, there is nevertheless an advantage to working with solidarity financing entities: their involvement in the review and monitoring of applications is often much greater than that of local commercial banks and so there are economies of scale with regard to their monitoring obligations. However, this arrangement distances FOGAL from their initial remit to raise capital available locally. In any event, the choice of partner as part of its strategy is of fundamental importance. The financial situation FOGAL had US$ 3,467,000 in assets at end-2008. Capital employed was therefore 82% of assets. Despite its limited size, the FOGAL guarantee fund has been profitable since 2006, based on its two main sources of revenue: a commission paid up front of 2.5% on the net amount of the guarantee; income from the invested capital (term or fixed interest deposits): FO- GAL does not invest in any risk-based assets given its origins and orientations. In total, 133,000 has been accumulated over the last three years, allowing the institution to establish a reserve of 5% of its capital in case of a call on a guarantee. Portfolio quality and guarantee calls The job of managing a guarantee fund is ultimately to ensure a risk that a financial partner is not ready to take on by providing a guarantee to an organisation from the South. In this context, the quality of the portfolio is a key factor for institutional sustainability. The risk assumed by FO- GAL may be diverse in nature: it depends on the political and socio-economic stability of the countries concerned, how sectors evolve (especially where farmers organisations are closely linked to one sector), and finally the development and evolution of the institution itself. These organisations are involved in sustainable development From this perspective, performance has been satisfactory over the past 5 years, given that only one guarantee 3 has been the subject of a call, to the tune of US$ 50,000, which represented 1.75% of outstanding guarantees as at December 31 st 2008. Social aspects of FOGAL s success If FOGAL s financial results have been convincing in recent years, its «social audit» is no less important a consideration. The scope of activities supported by FOGAL is significant: in 2008, FOGAL s MFI partners represented more than 86,000 members and / or customers for a loan portfolio of US$ 69.35 million. The current average loan size is about US$ 806 and is therefore much lower than the gross domestic product per capita of the countries concerned, which is respectively US$ 1,260 for Bolivia, US$ 3,080 for Ecuador and US$ 3,450 in Peru. Farmer associations, meanwhile, had 8,025 active members and annual revenues exceeding US$ 25 million. FOGAL targets support to vulnerable populations: in fact, it works specifically with farmer associations and with rural or semi-rural MFIs. A very large part of its activities is therefore in this area that is considered more difficult and riskier than others. In addition, at FOGAL s partner MFIs in Bolivia and Ecuador, women beneficiaries make up 51.87% and 72.48% of the respective totals. Finally, all FOGAL s farmer association partners are engaged in sustainable development practices, based on three pillars: economic, social and environmental. Indeed the practice of fair trade and organic production to ensure both a fairer price offered to farmers (of coffee, cocoa, bananas) and better social conditions of production, unlock margins that are spent on social investments (schools, sourcing water...) and preserve the environment for future generations. 2: Besides ALTERFIN and ETIMOS, FOGAL works with CRESUD and OIKOCREDIT. 3: This was a guarantee provided to a Chilean MFI.

p 5 Loans often support expanded marketing strategies. Laurent BIOT - SOS Faim A measure of FOGAL s impact An impact study was conducted in 2005 among a sample of FOGAL s partners. It was confined to a view of the impact on the partner institutions and not on the ultimate beneficiaries of the service. A number of effects of having access to a guarantee have been identified by this work: Direct effects: an increase in funds available for partner entities has enabled a greater volume of transactions to be guaranteed, more customers to be taken on, services to be offered to a larger number of members, but also new types of customers be integrated (risk taking), or new products or services developed; in some cases, presenting international guarantees has meant access to a better interest rate or more flexible credit terms (particularly with regard to their duration). Indirect effects: the guarantee has been the foundation of a lasting relationship with the financial system; the possibility of accessing new sources of financing (diversification); improving the profitability of the institution (better use of installed capacity); development of the institution itself. These effects are illustrated by two examples: CEPESIU, a non-governmental organisation in Ecuador, says that FOGAL s guarantee was key to it being able to re-launch its activities after the country s financial crisis (2000); it has helped grow the loan portfolio on average by 63% per year. Having access to guarantees has also made it easier to work with sectors that are considered higher risk. And finally, it has consolidated the relationship with a number of financial actors such as ALTERFIN, ETIMOS, CRESUD and BANCO SOLIDARIO. CONFIANZA, a Peruvian regulated entity (with EDPYMES, or, Small Business and Microenterprise Development Agency status) gained access to FOGAL guarantees very

p 6 Zoom microfinance n 28 october 2009 early in its history. The guarantee fund is associated with the early development of an institution that grew exponentially thereafter; CONFIANZA has diversified its sources of funding and established links with 18 funding partners. The guarantees have also given it access to a preferential rate (better by 1 or 2 points) and covered higher risk lending, specifically oriented towards the rural productive sector (agriculture). Conclusion and outlook The first job of a guarantee fund is to take risks that other financial institutions do not wish to assume, either in part or in whole. This risk needs to be measured and reasonable if one wishes to maintain the tool over time and ensure sustainability. FOGAL s experience shows that it is both possible to ensure a balanced finances despite a small amount of available capital, and service relatively high risk partner institutions: start-up or early growth MFIs with a portfolio below US$ 5 million, which prioritise rural areas; Having access to guarantees has also made it easier to work with sectors that are considered higher risk farmers organisations which have difficulty securing working capital financing from local banks or international social investors. Despite current satisfactory results, FOGAL faces three main challenges in the coming years of its development: attracting new financial backers in order to increase the fund s scale of operations; this increased activity should go hand in hand with diversification of geographical risk; adapting to a changing «market», in which it clearly strengthens its work in favour of farmer and producer organisations, while more and more microfinance investors refinance institutions based on the quality of their portfolios as evidenced by ratings; improving negotiating outcomes with local banks on behalf of the fund s partners, both in terms of the multiplier effect (better and more equitable sharing of risk) as well as preferential interest rates (better leveraging the existence of a guarantee, given that risk is a component in setting an interest rate).

p 7 Two case studies: FOGAL works closely with its partners A Microfinance Institution: FONDESURCO FONDESURCO works in southern Peru, in the Arequipa region. It was set up by 4 national development NGOs. FONDESURCO eceived a guarantee from FOGAL of US$ 75,000. This guarantee enabled it to take a loan from ALTERFIN cooperative (a Belgian social investor). Initially, the amount was US$ 150,000, rising to US$ 355,000 in 2009. The table below shows the positive evolution of a partner FO- GAL works with. FONDESURCO s specific distinction is that it targets a mainly rural audience (95%) but also largely productive activities (78%), with agriculture and livestock accounting for 61% and 17%, respectively, of its loan portfolio. Year Portfolio (US$) Number of Clients PAR 30j 4 2004 1,350,000 1,182 5.3% 2005 1,582,000 1,405 3.2% 2006 2,121,000 1,818 2.9% 2007 3,716,000 2,815 1.8% 2008 7,773,000 4,939 1% 4: PAR 30 refers to the portfolio at risk: it is the total of outstanding loans that are 30 days or more overdue divided by the total of all outstanding loans. PAR measures the current risk and potential losses as it takes into account all outstanding balances of overdue loans. An offshoot of farmer organisations: CAFE PERU Chimbote Pucallpa Huancayo Location of CAFE PERU s partners. CAFE PERU requires significant working capital in order to buy the produce from the various farmers, which it part pays for up front (maximum 80%). The table below shows how the guarantees granted to CAFE PERU and its members have evolved in size in tandem with annual turnover, sales volume and average coffee prices. Year Intervention FOGAL (US$) Turnover (US$) Volumes sold (quintals) Average price (US$) 2004 510,000 2,380,000 19,911 119.81 2005 560,000 4,150,000 29,513 140.74 2006 650,000 4,220,000 31,643 133.48 CAFE PERU was founded in 2001 by 5 of the country s major coffee farmer cooperatives. Currently, 7 cooperatives are shareholders in the company s stock. The main activity of the company is to process and commercialise its partners crops, its partners being the associated cooperatives, but it also services other small cooperatives. The goal is to get as attractive a price as possible for its 5,783 affiliated farmers and their families, while maintaining a high level of quality and seeking high value added niche markets. CAFE PERU s members generally have farms of 3 to 4 hectares in size. 46% of their produce is sold through fair trade channels and 35% is certified organic. 2007 1,110,000 6,750,000 48,952 137.98 2008 1,205,000 15,520,000 111,693 139.08 Forecast 2009 1,205,000 29,060,000 200,000 145.33 In recent years, CAFE PERU has been able to both pay farmers a fairer price, «erasing» or moderating the fluctuations in the global coffee market by targeting niche markets (fair trade, organic, gourmet,...) and turn a profit that has enabled the company to capitalize and invest in facilities more suited to its size and ambitions.

This issue of Zoom Microfinance was written by Marc Mees (who manages SOS Faim s Partner Support Service). SOS Faim and microfiance For several years, SOS Faim supports different microfinance institutions in Africa and Latin America. As with all development tools, we have to analyse the aims, models and implementation conditions of supports to farmers organisations. With this frame of mind, SOS Faim edits Zoom Microfinance. This publication is available for download in French, English and Spanish on SOS Faim s website: www.sosfaim.org. Apart from Zoom Microfinance, SOS Faim publishes another newsletter, Farming Dynamics, which deals with the challenges faced by agricultural producers and farmers organisations in their development. This publication is also available for download in French, English and Spanish SOS Faim s website: www.sosfaim.org. The last issues of Zoom Microfinance have dealt with the following topics: n 27 Serve remote rural zones: The experience of Buusaa Gonofaa MFI in Ethiopia n 26 Legal status and good governance - is there a clear link? n 25 Alliances with financial institutions: the best solution for financing needs of farmer organisations and their members? Editor: Freddy Destrait, rue aux Laines 4, B-1000 Brussels (Belgium). Coordinator: Marine Lefebvre Graphism: Marmelade Studio Zoom Microfinance is printed on recycled paper SOS Faim Agir avec le Sud Rue aux Laines, 4 B - B-1000 Brussels - Belgium Phone 32-(0)2-511.22.38 Fax 32-(0)2-514.47.77 E-mail info.be@sosfaim.org SOS Faim Action pour le développement 88, rue Victor Hugo L-4141 Esch-sur-Alzette - Luxembourg Phone 352-49.09.96 Fax 352-49.09.96.28 E-mail info-luxembourg@sosfaim.org Web site www.sosfaim.org Zoom Microfinance is produced with support from the Belgian Directorate-General for Development Cooperation and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Luxembourg. n 24 Popular investment associations in Ecuador: A case of solidarity-based micro-investment n 23 Equipment loans provided by Kafo Jiginew (Mali): investing in family farms n 22 Moving towards a structured microfinance sector in Senegal: the experience of FONGS n 21 Buusaa Gonofa in Ethiopia : marketing vision and fighting against poverty