RMSC 4005 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk. 1 Exercises. (c) Let X = {X n } n=0 be a {F n }-supermartingale. Show that.

Similar documents
1.1 Basic Financial Derivatives: Forward Contracts and Options

STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND BLACK-SCHOLES MODEL

AMH4 - ADVANCED OPTION PRICING. Contents

Risk Neutral Measures

The stochastic calculus

PAPER 27 STOCHASTIC CALCULUS AND APPLICATIONS

Brownian Motion. Richard Lockhart. Simon Fraser University. STAT 870 Summer 2011

4 Martingales in Discrete-Time

Exam Quantitative Finance (35V5A1)

An Introduction to Stochastic Calculus

Lecture 17. The model is parametrized by the time period, δt, and three fixed constant parameters, v, σ and the riskless rate r.

Basic Arbitrage Theory KTH Tomas Björk

Stochastic modelling of electricity markets Pricing Forwards and Swaps

Martingale Approach to Pricing and Hedging

Economathematics. Problem Sheet 1. Zbigniew Palmowski. Ws 2 dw s = 1 t

PAPER 211 ADVANCED FINANCIAL MODELS

Valuation of derivative assets Lecture 8

Drunken Birds, Brownian Motion, and Other Random Fun

Pricing theory of financial derivatives

Chapter 3: Black-Scholes Equation and Its Numerical Evaluation

Introduction to Probability Theory and Stochastic Processes for Finance Lecture Notes

Lecture 3: Review of mathematical finance and derivative pricing models

Continuous Time Finance. Tomas Björk

Option Pricing. 1 Introduction. Mrinal K. Ghosh

Stochastic Calculus, Application of Real Analysis in Finance

Hedging under Arbitrage

Equivalence between Semimartingales and Itô Processes

Martingale representation theorem

Lecture Notes for Chapter 6. 1 Prototype model: a one-step binomial tree

25857 Interest Rate Modelling

Black-Scholes Model. Chapter Black-Scholes Model

Stochastic calculus Introduction I. Stochastic Finance. C. Azizieh VUB 1/91. C. Azizieh VUB Stochastic Finance

Stochastic Differential equations as applied to pricing of options

Lecture 8: The Black-Scholes theory

Change of Measure (Cameron-Martin-Girsanov Theorem)

Computational Finance

PDE Approach to Credit Derivatives

Financial Economics & Insurance

The Black-Scholes PDE from Scratch

θ(t ) = T f(0, T ) + σ2 T

Risk Neutral Valuation

Partial differential approach for continuous models. Closed form pricing formulas for discretely monitored models

1 Mathematics in a Pill 1.1 PROBABILITY SPACE AND RANDOM VARIABLES. A probability triple P consists of the following components:

S t d with probability (1 p), where

is a standard Brownian motion.

THE MARTINGALE METHOD DEMYSTIFIED

BIRKBECK (University of London) MSc EXAMINATION FOR INTERNAL STUDENTS MSc FINANCIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, MATHEMATICS AND STATIS- TICS

KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET (Blok 2, 2011/2012) Naturvidenskabelig kandidateksamen Continuous time finance (FinKont) TIME ALLOWED : 3 hours

MSc Financial Engineering CHRISTMAS ASSIGNMENT: MERTON S JUMP-DIFFUSION MODEL. To be handed in by monday January 28, 2013

CONVERGENCE OF OPTION REWARDS FOR MARKOV TYPE PRICE PROCESSES MODULATED BY STOCHASTIC INDICES

Path Dependent British Options

CONTINUOUS TIME PRICING AND TRADING: A REVIEW, WITH SOME EXTRA PIECES

Last Time. Martingale inequalities Martingale convergence theorem Uniformly integrable martingales. Today s lecture: Sections 4.4.1, 5.

Economics has never been a science - and it is even less now than a few years ago. Paul Samuelson. Funeral by funeral, theory advances Paul Samuelson

Lecture Note 8 of Bus 41202, Spring 2017: Stochastic Diffusion Equation & Option Pricing

Martingales. by D. Cox December 2, 2009

An Introduction to Point Processes. from a. Martingale Point of View

Option Pricing Models for European Options

Lecture 11: Ito Calculus. Tuesday, October 23, 12

The Use of Importance Sampling to Speed Up Stochastic Volatility Simulations

Optimal robust bounds for variance options and asymptotically extreme models

Remarks: 1. Often we shall be sloppy about specifying the ltration. In all of our examples there will be a Brownian motion around and it will be impli

A note on the existence of unique equivalent martingale measures in a Markovian setting

Optimal stopping problems for a Brownian motion with a disorder on a finite interval

A No-Arbitrage Theorem for Uncertain Stock Model

Insiders Hedging in a Stochastic Volatility Model with Informed Traders of Multiple Levels

Lévy models in finance

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 11 10/9/2013. Martingales and stopping times II

Risk, Return, and Ross Recovery

MAS452/MAS6052. MAS452/MAS Turn Over SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS. Stochastic Processes and Financial Mathematics

Stochastic Dynamical Systems and SDE s. An Informal Introduction

Advanced topics in continuous time finance

Stochastic Processes and Stochastic Calculus - 9 Complete and Incomplete Market Models

An overview of some financial models using BSDE with enlarged filtrations

Stochastic Volatility

Non-semimartingales in finance

MATH3075/3975 FINANCIAL MATHEMATICS TUTORIAL PROBLEMS

BROWNIAN MOTION II. D.Majumdar

Credit Risk in Lévy Libor Modeling: Rating Based Approach

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 6.265/15.070J Fall 2013 Lecture 19 11/20/2013. Applications of Ito calculus to finance

Sensitivity Analysis on Long-term Cash flows

************* with µ, σ, and r all constant. We are also interested in more sophisticated models, such as:

Introduction to Stochastic Calculus

Basic Concepts and Examples in Finance

Continuous time; continuous variable stochastic process. We assume that stock prices follow Markov processes. That is, the future movements in a

Black-Scholes Option Pricing

The Valuation of Bermudan Guaranteed Return Contracts

M5MF6. Advanced Methods in Derivatives Pricing

Introduction to Stochastic Calculus

Stochastic Processes and Financial Mathematics (part two) Dr Nic Freeman

Structural Models of Credit Risk and Some Applications

DYNAMIC CDO TERM STRUCTURE MODELLING

The British Russian Option

Conditional Full Support and No Arbitrage

Extended Libor Models and Their Calibration

MARTINGALES AND LOCAL MARTINGALES

Advanced Stochastic Processes.

Hedging under arbitrage

Lecture 4. Finite difference and finite element methods

Modeling via Stochastic Processes in Finance

Transcription:

1. EXERCISES RMSC 45 Stochastic Calculus for Finance and Risk Exercises 1 Exercises 1. (a) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-martingale. Show that E(X n ) = E(X ) n N (b) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-submartingale. Show that E(X ) E(X 1 ) E(X 2 ) (c) Let X = {X n } n= be a {F n }-supermartingale. Show that E(X ) E(X 1 ) E(X 2 ) 2. Let X be an integrable random variable defined on (Ω, F, P), and G is a sub-σ-field of F. Show that the random variable E(X G) is also integrable. 3. Given a filtered probability space (Ω, F, {F n } n=, P), and an integrable random variable X. Show that Y n E(X F n ) is a {F n }-martingale. 4. Let N(t) be a Poisson process with intensity λ. Show that M(t) N(t) λt is a martingale. 5. Let Y, Y 1,... be a Markov Chain process with transition probability matrix P and state space {1, 2,..., s}. Suppose f is a bounded function defined on {1, 2,..., s} and satisfies s f(i) = p ij f(j). j=1 Set X n = f(y n ) and F n = σ{y, Y 1,..., Y n } for n =, 1, 2,.... Show that {X n } is a {F n }-martingale. 1

1. EXERCISES 6. Show that T is a stopping time if and only if {T = n} F n n 7. If T 1 and T 2 are two stopping times on (Ω, F, {F n } n=, P), show that is also a stopping time. T min {T 1, T 2 } = T 1 T 2 8. Given a filtered probability space (Ω, F, {F n } n=, P). Suppose a stochastic process X = {X n } n= is adapted. Let B be a Borel set and define Show that τ is a stopping time. τ = min {n X n B}. 9. Suppose t is a positive constant (deterministic). Show that T t is a stopping time. 1. Let ξ 1, ξ 2,... be a sequence of independent random variables with P(ξ n = 1) = P(ξ n = 1) = 1/2. Define X =, X n = n i=1 ξ i, and F n = σ{x 1, X 2,..., X n } for n = 1, 2,... (i.e. X is a symmetric random walk). Let τ = min {n X n = K} where K is a positive integer and Show that (a) τ is a stopping time, (b) {Y n } n= is a martingale, Y n = ( 1) n cos [π(x n + K)] n. (c) E(( 1) r ) = ( 1) K, using the version of Optional Stopping Theorem stated in Question 5. 11. Let {W t } t be a P-Brownian motion. Show that (a) Cov(W s, W t ) = s t, (b) {cw t/c 2} t is also a P-Brownian motion. 2

1. EXERCISES 12. Let {W t } t be a Brownian motion, and define a random variable T a inf {t W t = a}, which is the hitting time of level a, where a is positive. Show that P(T a t) = 2P(W t a). 13. Let {W t } t be a Brownian motion, and < t < t 1 <. Show that the probability that W t has at least one zero (i.e. the path of the Brownian motion intersect the t-axis) in the interval (t, t 1 ) is given by 2 π arccos t. t 1 14. Show that B sdb s = 1 2 B2 t 1 2 t. 15. Show that (a) sdw s = tw t W sds (b) W s 2 dw s = 1 3 W t 3 W sds 16. For constant c and α, define Prove that X t = e ct+αw t. (1) dx t = (c + 1 2 α2 )X t dt + αx t dw t (2) 17. Use Itô lemma to prove that the following stochastic processes are martingales: (a) X t = e 1 2 t cosw t (b) X t = e 1 2 t sinw t (c) X t = (W t + t)exp( W t.5t) 18. Show that if θ is a fixed constant, then the process L t = exp( 3 θdw s 1 2 θ 2 ds)

is a martinglae. Hence show that. E(L t ) = 1 t 19. Derive the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Formula for a European Call Option, S Φ(d 1 ) Ke rt Φ(d 2 ), where d 1 = ln(s K ) + (r + σ2 /2) σ, d 2 = d 1 σ T ; T with exercise price K, expiration date T, current stock price S, and the stated market dynamics. 2 Solutions 1. (a) Since X is a martingale, E(X n+1 F n ) = X n, n =, 1, 2,.... Taking expectation on both sides yields E(E(X n+1 F n )) = E(X n ). Hence E(X n+1 ) = E(E(X n+1 F n )) = E(X n ), n =, 1, 2,... This means that E(X ) = E(X 1 ) = E(X 2 ) =.... (b) Since X is a submartingale, E(X n+1 F n ) X n, n =, 1, 2,.... Taking expectation on both sides yields E(E(X n+1 F n )) E(X n ). Hence E(X n+1 ) = E(E(X n+1 F n )) E(X n ), n =, 1, 2,.... This means that E(X ) E(X 1 ) E(X 2 ).... (c) The proof is similar to that of part (b). 4

2. The random variable X is integrable means that E( X ) <. Define X + = max(x, ), X = max( X, ). Observe that both X + and X are positive random variables, and X = X + X, X = X + + X. To show that E(X G) is integrable, we have to show that This can be done as follows: E( E(X G) ) <. E( E(X G) ) = E( E(X + X G ) = E( E(X + G) E(X G) ) E( E(X + G) E(X G) ) = E(E(X + G) + E(X G)) = E(E(X + + X G)) = E(E( X G)) = E( X ) < 3. To show that the process Y is a {F n }-martingale, we need to check the three defining properties of a martingale. By the properties of conditional expectation, Y n = E(X F n ) is F n -measurable. Since X is integrable, Y n = E(X F n ), which is a conditional expectation of X, is also integrable by Exercise 2. Finally, we show the martingale identity: E(Y n+1 F n ) = E(E(X F n+1 ) F n ) = E(X F n ) = Y n for n = 1, 2,..., in which the second equality follows from the tower property of conditional expectation. 5

4. Let F t = σ{n(s); s t} = σ{m(s); s t}. The adaptability and integrability of the process M are trivial, so we only show the martingale identity. For s t, we have E(M(t) F s ) = E(N(t) λt F s ) = E(N(t) F s ) E(λt F s ) = E(N(t) N(s) + N(s) F s ) λt = E(N(t) N(s) F s ) + E(N(s) F s ) λt = E(N(t) N(s)) + N(s) λt = λ(t s) + N(s) λt = N(s) λs = M(s) 5. Again, we have to show the three defining properties of a martingale. Since Y n is F n -measurable and X n = f(y n ), X n is also F n -measurable. This means that the process X is {F n }-adapted. Since f is bounded, there exists a positive constant C such that f(i) < C for i = 1, 2,..., s. Then E( X n ) = E( f(y n ) ) < E(C) = C < for n =, 1, 2.... Hence X n is integrable. Now we show the martingale identity. For n =, 1, 2,..., E(X n+1 F n ) = E(f(Y n+1 ) F n ) = E(f(Y n+1 ) σ{y, Y 1,..., Y n }) s = f(j)p Yn j j=1 = f(y n ) = X n where the third equality follows from the fact that Y is a Markov Chain with transition probability matrix P = (p ij ). 6. ) Observe that {T = n} = {T n}\{t n 1} = {T n} {T n 1} c 6

As T is a stopping time, we have {T n} F n and {T n 1} F n 1 F n. This implies that {T = n} F n. ) Now assume that {T = n} F n for n =, 1, 2,.... Observe that {T n} = {T = } {T = 1} {T = n 1} {T = n}. For any k n, we have by assumption that Hence {T n} F n. {T = k} F k F n. 7. To show that T = T 1 T 2 is a stopping time, we only need to show that {T n} F n for any positive integer n. This can be seen easily from the following relationship: {T n} = {T 1 T 2 n} = {T 1 n} {T 2 n} 8. By Exercise 6, we only have to show that {T = n} F n for any positive integer n. First we can decompose the set {T = n} as: {T = n} = {X / B} {X 1 / B} {X n 1 / B} {X n / B}. Next, we make the following observations: For k =, 1, 2,..., n 1, we have {X k / B} = {ω Ω X k (ω) / B} = {ω Ω X k (ω) B c } = X 1 k (Bc ) F k F n since B c is a Borel set and X k is F k -measurable (X is {F n }- adapted). Again, as X is {F n }-adapted, X n is F n -measurable. This implies that {X n B} = {ω Ω X n (ω) B} = Xn 1 (B) F n Combining the above two points, we know that {T = n} F n, hence T is a stopping time. 7

9. If T always equals to a positive constant t, then for any n N, we have { Ω if t n; {T n} = {t n} = if t > n. which is F n -measurable since the empty set and the whole sample space Ω belong to the σ-field F n. 1. (a) We apply the result of Exercise 8 by letting the Borel set B be the { K, K}. (b) To show that Y is a {F n }-martingale, we have to check the three defining conditions for a martingale: Since we are dealing with the natural filtration, obviously X n is F n -measurable for any positive integer n. As Y n is a function of X n, it is also F n -measurable, i.e. the process Y is adapted. Since the cosine function is bounded by 1, we have E( Y n ) = E( ( 1) n cos(π(x n + K)) ) 1 <. This means that each Y n is integrable. For the martingale equality: E[Y n+1 F n ] = E[( 1) n+1 cos(π(x n+1 + K)) F n ] = ( 1) n+1 E[cos(π(X n + K + ξ n+1 )) F n ] = ( 1) n+1 E[cos(π(X n + K)) cos(πξ n+1 ) sin(π(x n + K)) sin(πξ n+1 ) F n ] = ( 1) n+1 cos(π(x n + K))E[cos(πξ n+1 ) F n ] ( 1) n+1 sin(π(x n + K))E[sin(πξ n+1 ) F n ] = Y n E[cos(πξ n+1 )] ( 1) n+1 sin(π(x n + K))E[sin(πξ n+1 )] = Y n (cos(π) + cos( π)) 2 ( 1)n+1 sin(π(x n + K))(sin(π) + sin( π)) 2 = Y n 8

11. (a) (c) In order to apply the version of Optional Stopping Theorem, we first show that the martingale Y and the stopping time T in the current question satisfy the three conditions in OST: i. It is a well-known fact that τ < a.s. (Recall what you have learned in the PM course!) ii. It is obviously that Y τ 1 and hence it is integrable. iii. Using the fact that E(X) E( X ), we have E(Y τ I {τ>n} ) E( Y τ I {τ>n} ) E( I {τ>n} ) = E(I {τ>n} ) = P(τ > n) P(τ = + ) Since τ <, P-a.s., we have P(τ = + ) =. squeezing principle, we obtain the desired result: E(Y τ I {τ>n} ). Now by OST, the following is true: E(Y r ) = E(Y ). As X =, we have Y = cos(πk) = ( 1) K, and hence ( 1) K = E(( 1) τ cos(π(x r + K))) { E(( 1) τ cos(2kπ)) if X τ = K, = E(( 1) τ cos()) if X τ = K. = E(( 1) r ). Cov(W s, W t ) = E(W s W t ) E(W s )E(W t ) = E(W s W t ) = E(W s (W t W s ) + W 2 s ) = E(W s )E(W t W s ) + E(W 2 s ) = E(W 2 s ) = s = t s 9 By the

(b) Let Y t = cw t/c 2. (i) Y = cw = (ii) For each ω Ω Y t (ω) = cw t/c 2(ω). Since W t (ω) is continuous in t, therefore Y t (ω) is continuous in t. (iii) For t t 1... t n, Y t Y = cw t /c 2 cw Y t1 Y t = cw t1 /c 2 cw t /c 2. Y tn Y tn 1 = cw tn /c 2 cw t n 1 /c 2 Since t t 1... t n, we have t c t 1 2 c... t n 2 c 2. Therefore, Y t Y, Y t1 Y t,..., Y tn Y tn 1 are independent. (iv) For t >, s, as W t c 2 + s c 2 12. Note that W s c 2 Y t+s Y s N(, t c 2 ). = cw t+s c ( 2 = c W t c 2 + s c 2 N(, t) cw s c 2 W s {W t a} {T a t} by path continuity of W T a is stopping time Y t = W t+ta W Ta motion W Ta = a P(W t a) = P(W t a and T a t) c 2 ) = P(W t W Ta and T a t) is also a P-Brownian = P(T a t)p(w t W Ta T a t) = 1 2 P(T a t) 1

13. (i) Given W t = a >, Since P(W s = for some s (t, t 1 )) ( ) = P min (W t +t W t a) < t < t 1 t ( ) = P min Wt a < t < t 1 t ( ) = P max Wt a < t < t 1 t = P (T a t 1 t ) = 1 t P(T a t) = 2P(W t a) = f Ta (t) = a 2π t 3/2 e a2 /2t f Ta (s)ds P(W s = for somes (t, t 1 ) W t = a) = a 2 2 e x2 2t dx = 2πt π a/ e y2 2 dy t a 2π 1 t s 3/2 e a2 /2s ds We have, by symmetry, a similar result for a <. In this case, we have to replace a 2π in the above equation by a 2π. for a R, P(W t has at least one zero W t = a) = g(a) a 2π 1 t s 3/2 e a2 /2s ds 11

(ii) = = 2 = 2 = = = = 2 π P(W t has at least 1 zero in (t, t 1 )) 1 π t 1 π t P(W t = a)g(a) da P(W t = a)g(a) da 1 e a2 /2t a t1 t [ s 3/2 e a2 /2s ds] da 2πt 2π 1 t 1 t 1 t t π (t 1 t )/t as 3/2 e a 2 2 ( 1 t + 1 s ) ds da s 3/2 ds (t + s) s dv 1 + v ) 2 = 2 π tan 1 ( t1 t t 14. (a) We want to compute ae a 2 2 ( 1 t + 1 s ) da ds = 2 π cos 1 t t 1 B s db s Let Π = { = t, t 1, t 2,..., t n = t} be a partition of interval [,t], the above integral can be approximated by n B tj 1 (B tj B tj 1 ). j=1 (Note: In Itô integral, we ALWAYS use left point, that is n n B tj 1 (B tj B tj 1 )instead of B tj (B tj B tj 1 )) j=1 As δ (π), B sdb s. j=1 n j=1 B t j 1 (B t j B tj 1 ) will converge in L2 to 12

Observe that B 2 t j B 2 t j 1 = (B tj B tj 1 ) 2 + 2B tj B tj 1 2B 2 t j 1 = (B tj B tj 1 ) 2 + 2B tj 1 (B tj B tj 1 ) B tj 1 (B tj B tj 1 ) = 1 2 [(B2 t j Bt 2 j 1 ) (B tj B tj 1 ) 2 ] n B tj 1 (B tj B tj 1 ) = 1 n [(Bt 2 2 j Bt 2 j 1 ) (B tj B tj 1 ) 2 ] j=1 j=1 = 1 2 B2 t 1 2 n (B tj B tj 1 ) 2 j=1 Since as δ (π), n (B tj B tj 1 ) 2 t in L 2 j=1 (Quadratic Variation of {B t } is [B] t = t!) As δ (π), n j=1 B t (B j 1 t j B ) 1 tj 1 2 B2 t 1 2t in L2 B sdb s = 1 2 B2 t 1 2 t 15. (a) d(tw t ) = W t dt + tdw t tw t = ( W ) + ie sdw s = tw t (g(t, x) = tx) W s ds + W s ds sdw s 13

(b) d(w 3 t ) = 3W 2 t dw t + 1 2 (6W t)(dw t ) 2 (g(t, x) = x 3 ) = 3Wt 2 dw t + 1 2 (6W t)dt Wt 3 = W 3 + ie 3W 2 s dw s + W 2 s dw s = 1 3 W 3 t W s ds 1 2 (6W s)ds 16. 17. (a) X t = e ct+αw t (g(t, x) = tx) dx t = ce ct+αw t dt + αe ct+αw t dw t + 1 2 α2 e ct+αw t (dw t ) 2 = cx t dt + αx t dw t + 1 2 α2 X t dt = (c + α2 2 )X tdt + αx t dw t X t = e 1 2 t cosw t (g(t, x) = e 1 2 t cosx) dx t = 1 2 e 1 2 t cosw t dt e 1 2 t sinw t dw t 1 2 e 1 2 t cosw t (dw t ) 2 ie X t = 1 2 e 1 2 t cosw t dt e 1 2 t sinw t dw t 1 2 e 1 2 t cosw t dt = e 1 2 t sinw t dw t = X X t is a martingale. (b) Similar to (a). (c) Similar to (a). e 1 2 s sinw s dw s Remarks: In general, if we want to check whether a process X t = g(t, W t ) 14

is a martingale, we use Itô lemma to write down dx t = dt + dw t. if is zero, then X t is a martingale!! 18. (a) Let By Itô s lemma, Y t = θdw s 1 θ 2 ds 2 { dyt = 1 2 θ2 dt θdw t = e Y t L t dl t = e Y t dy t + 1 2 ey t dy t dy t = L t ( 1 2 θ2 dt θdw t ) + 1 2 L tθ 2 dt = L t θdw t which is driftless. L t is a martingale E(L t ) = E(L ) = E(e Y ) = 1 Problem: Is L t θ H T? We don t know! Hence the above proof is not correct, strictly speaking. That s why we need the Novikov s condition. Another Method: L t = exp( θdw s 1 θ 2 ds) 2 = exp( θw t 1 2 θ2 t) 15

i. W t F t and L t is a function of W t, L t F t ii. E( L t ) = E(L t ) = E(e θw t )e 1 2 θ2 t = e 1 2 ( θ)2t e 1 2 θ2 t = 1 < iii. L t is integrable. E(L t F s ) = E(e θ(w t W s +W s ) F s )e 1 2 θ2 t t s = e 1 2 θ2t e θw s E(e θ(w t W s ) F s ) e θw s F s = e 1 2 θ2t e θw s E(e θ(w t W s ) ) Indep. Increment = e 1 2 θ2t e θw s e 1 2 ( θ)2 (t s) W t W s = N(, s) = e θw s 1 2 θ2 s = L s {L t } is a martingale. 19. { dbt = rb t dt ds t = µs t dt + σs t dw t X = max{s T K, } Step 1: Find a probability measure Q the discounted stock price: Details: Z t = e rt S t. Z t = Bt 1 S t = e rt S t is a Q-martingale. 16

By Itô lemma, dz t = re rt S t dt + e rt ds t = rz t dt + e rt (µs t dt + σs t dw t ) Define Q by = rz t dt + µz t dt + σz t dw t = σz t [ µ r σ dt + dw t] dq dp = exp{ By Girsanov s Thm, T From W t = W t + µ r σ t, we obtain µ r σ dw s.5 T W t = W t + µ r t is a Q-B.M. σ ( µ r σ )2 ds} d W t dz t = dw t + µ r dt,hence σ = σz t [ µ r σ dt + dw t] = σz t d W t Z t is a Q - martingale. Step 2: Define E t e rt E Q (X F t ). Show that E t is a Q -martingale, and that de t = φ t dz t for some {φ t } Details: E t is a Q-martingale is easy to show! (c.f. Tutorial 4 Q3). By Martingale Representation Theorem, φ t s.t. ie de t = φ t d W t. E t = E + φ s d W s. 17

From Step 1, we know that dz t = σz t d W t de t = φ 1 t dz t σz t = φ t dz t Step 3: Find (φ t, θ t ) a self-financing, replicative portfolio Details: { θt : number of bonds φ t : number of shares For φ t, we use the φ t in step 2. For Q t, we use : Q t E t φ t Z t Check Self-Financing: V t = Q t B t + φ t S t = (E t φ t Z t )B t + φ t S t = E t B t φ t Z t B t + φ t S t = E t B t dv t = E t db t + B t de t (φ t, Q t ) is self-financing. = E t db t + B t φ t dz t = (θ t + φ t Z t )db t + B t φ t dz t = Q t db t + φ t (Z t db t + B t dz t ) = Q t db t + φ t d(z t B t ) = Q t db t + φ t ds t 18

Check replicate X : V T = E T B T = B T e rt E Q (X F T ) = E Q (X F T ) = X ( X F T ) Step 4: In step 3, we have found a SF, replicative portfolio. Hence, the value of option at time t is V t. Find V. Details: From Step 3, V t = B t E t V = B E = E = e rt E Q (X F ) = e rt E Q (X) = e rt E Q [max(s T K, )] We need to know the dist n of S T expectation: under Q in order to compute the ds t = µs t dt + σs t dw t = µs t dt + σs t (d W t µ r σ dt) = rs t dt + σs t d W t S t = S exp { (r- σ2 2 )t + σ W t } Hence S T = S exp { (r- σ2 2 )T + σ W t } and 19

W t is distributed as N(, T ) under Q. V = e rt E Q (max(s T K, )) = e rt σ2 (r max(s e 2 )T +σx K, ) 1 e x2 2T dx 2πT = e rt ln K S (r σ2 /2)T σ [S e (r σ2 /2)T +σx K] e x 2 2T dx 2πT d2 = e rt [S e (r σ2 /2)T +σy T K] e y 2 dy 2π = S d2 1 2π e.5(y σ T ) 2 dy Ke rt φ(d 2 ) = S φ(d 2 + σ T ) Ke rt φ(d 2 ) = S φ(d 1 ) Ke rt φ(d 2 ) 2 Remarks: where d 1 = ln s k + (r + σ2 /2)T σ T, d 2 = ln s k + (r σ2 /2)T σ T (a) The Q so constructed is called Equivalent Martingale Measure (EMM) or Risk-Neutral Measure. (b) A EMM turns the discounted stock price a martingale, ie fair game (c) For general X, we have P t = V t = E t B t = e r(t t) E Q (X F t ), ie P t is the expected discounted value of X, but not expected under P!! 2