REDUCING THE RISK OF RISK-BASED CONTRACTS

Similar documents
How Bundled Payments Create Value in New Product Designs Cognizant

Creating Effective Reinsurance Programs

The Emergence of Value-Based Care: Present and Future Tense

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Overview

9/23/2016. Our Services. Transitioning from Fee-for-Service to Value-based Reimbursement. Key Trends and Strategies for Rural Health Providers

Managing the risk and unpredictable costs of transplants

Optum. Actuarial Toolbox Proven, sophisticated and market-leading actuarial models for health plans and benefits consultants

Enterprise Risk Management

Narrow, Tailored, Tiered and High Performance Networks: An Emerging Trend

Transitioning Into a Successful Risk-Based ACO

The three C s: How consolidation, customization and collaboration will continue to impact commercial brokers in 2018

Medicare Program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations Proposed Rule

Gulf Coast and LA HFMA Payer Summit Value-based contracts same healthcare business?

Reinsurance Section News

Building Actuarial Cost Models from Health Care Claims Data for Strategic Decision-Making. Introduction. William Bednar, FSA, FCA, MAAA

2018 STOP-LOSS SURVEY:

Reinsurance and Cost-Sharing Reductions Estimates

Value Based Contracting

than value. infrastructure for value-based payment, it is apparent that greater assumption of

CF Health Advisors: Partner Biographies

21% Total Medicare Beneficiaries (2017): 58 million

Delivering Value for All Health Care Stakeholders. Larry Merlo President & Chief Executive Officer

Modeling Extreme Event Risk

CONTAINING HEALTHCARE COSTS: IT S TIME TO RETHINK YOUR APPROACH

Large Limits Playbook. Building Successful Partnerships with Large Limit Clients

Projected Impacts of Adopting a Pharmacy Carve-In Approach Within Medicaid Capitation Programs

Clinical Episode Contracting for Commercial Payers January 2019

Introducing XL Catlin Five ways we ll power your business.

Health care affordability VBC transformation

When the Dust Settles-What s Next?

How Health Reform Saves Consumers and Taxpayers Money

Could an All-Payer System Improve the Affordability of US Health Care? Overview. David V. Axene, FSA, FCA, CERA, MAAA

Reinsurance / Stop-Loss and How You Can t Live Without It In Risk

A MERICAN ACADEMY of ACTUARIES

Commercial Insurance

Risk Contracting: What to Know About Stop Loss Insurance KATHRYN A BOWEN, EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT OCTOBER 27, 2016

Risk & Analytics. Trends within Insurance Companies Risk Management. Marc Paasch June Willis Towers Watson. All rights reserved.

Reference Pricing and Bundled Payments

New payment models: Withholds

FUNDS FLOW METHODOLOGY FOR RISK-BASED CONTRACTS

Shifting the Self-Pay Patient Paradigm: The Economic Management of the Patient Responsibility

Catastrophe Risk Modelling. Foundational Considerations Regarding Catastrophe Analytics

The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA): Unique Financing for a Unique Risk

Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending

National Association of ACOs. ACO Cost and MACRA Implementation Survey. May

ORGANIZING NORTH CAROLINA S SAFETY-NET SITES INTO A HEALTH SYSTEM. A Healthy Neighbors Assurance Plan. January 26, 2017

2017 STOP-LOSS SURVEY:

Assessing ACO Performance

developing a CIN for strategic value

The Self-Pay Gap: Growing Opportunity or Ticking Time Bomb?

The Pros and Cons of Self-Funding Health Coverage

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

Client Risk Solutions Going beyond insurance. Risk solutions for the Healthcare sector. Start

Point of View: Medicare Profitability in a Reform Market

Direct Contracting 101: Collaborations Between Employers and Health Care Providers

INSURANCE FOR THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY

Mergers, Acquisitions, Affiliations, and More

The Health Management Academy Strategic Survey Q1 2019: Defining Risk. March 2019

The Case For Value ACA to MACRA to MIPS

Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator User s Guide

Preliminary Report on a Secure Benefit Set for the Public Employees Insurance Program (PEIP)

Healthcare Financial Management Association Certification Program. Module I: The Business of Health Care Learner s Guide

MACRA: APPLICATIONS & IMPLICATIONS September 13, /13/2016. Mark Blessing, CPA, FHFMA Partner

2012 Workplace Benefits Report

Business Simulations for the Insurance Industry

MGA & Program Solutions

Valuation of Alternative Payment Models

Re: Comments on proposed rule for the Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations

Session 64PD, Risk-Sharing Arrangements in Medicare Advantage

White Paper. AMGA Advocacy. Taking Risk, 3.0: Medical Groups Are Moving to Risk Is Anyone Else? AMGA s Third Annual Survey on Taking Risk

March 28, Dear Administrator Slavitt:

Improving health care affordability Helping health plans bend the cost curve

Figure 1: Original APM Framework

Q Formulary Performance:

Medical Stop Loss Carriers Evaluation & Selection

Helping you improve your investment portfolio in challenging markets

Achieving Value-based Care in Rural Populations through Provider-Sponsored Health Plans. February 11, 2014

Problems with Current Health Plans

Public Sector Letter. Time to Take Another Look at Stop-Loss Insurance

Controlling Hospital Charges for Self-funded Plans

CHCS. Technical Assistance. Tool. Implementing the Medicaid Primary Care Rate. Increase: A Roadmap for States. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc.

Eight Indispensable Financial Considerations of Shifting from Volume to Value Reimbursement

Building a best-in-class global insurance and risk solutions provider

Maximizing Employee Benefits Through Multinational Pooling. Spring 2016 Presented by Lockton Companies

Embrace the Solvency II internal model

11/6/2017. How to Use Federal Regulations to Protect Your Revenue from MCOs. WHO WE ARE DISCLOSURE OF COMMERCIAL INTERESTS.

Commercial Insurance

Delivering Value-Based Care:

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. ECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING INITIATIVE & APPLICATIONS

ERM and Reserve Risk

Improving Innovation in Health Services Through Better Payment Reforms

LDI Fundamentals: Where to Begin?

Commercial Insurance

Risk Adjusted Episodes as Benchmarks for ACOs: A Society of Actuaries Sponsored Study

Managing Risk For Financially Successful Families

How are the State, Managed Medicaid Organizations and Providers Preparing for Medicaid Value-Based Payments?

BPCI Advanced: Updates from CMS and Details on the New Pricing Methodology. April 26, MedAxiom Consulting, LLC. All rights reserved.

Stakeholder Innovation Group (SIG):

Prospective vs. Retrospective. Will Bundled Payment Really Be.. Fee For Service

ECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING CARe Seminar JUNE 2016

Transcription:

REDUCING THE RISK OF RISK-BASED CONTRACTS Payers are promoting risk-based contracting as a solution for escalating health care costs. The question health care organizations must ask is, How much risk can we assume?

CONTENTS The Risk-based Contract Movement is Growing 1 How Health Care Organizations Assume Risk Risk-sharing Contract Types 5 5 Ways Health Care Organizations Mitigate Risk 7 Mitigating Risk through Insurance 8 Risk Mitigation Insurance Products Characteristics of Risk Mitigation Insurance 9 Conclusion 11 Why Partner with Risk Strategies 11 / 2

THE RISK-BASED CONTRACT MOVEMENT IS GROWING As health care inflation continues to escalate, payers are increasingly focused on controlling costs while simultaneously improving quality of care and patient experience. There is widespread belief that realigning provider financial incentives through risk-based contracting is part of the solution. As the movement grows, health care organizations find themselves questioning what forms contracts will take and how to protect themselves from potential financial perils associated with assuming risk. READINESS FOR RISK VARIES The appetite of health care organizations for entering into risk-based arrangements varies. At one end of the spectrum, organizations embrace the transition from fee-for-service to value-based reimbursement. They are prepared to make the necessary investments and maximize the opportunity. On the other end of the spectrum, other health care organizations can t see beyond the status quo fee-for-service model. Unprepared, they enter into risk-based contracts only when there is no other option. Most organizations fall somewhere in between these two extremes. TRADITIONAL FEE-FOR-SERVICE UNPREPARED VALUE-BASED PROGRAMS PREPARED / 3

HOW HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS ASSUME RISK Depending on market dynamics, health care providers assume risk for the delivery of health care services through a wide range of vehicles. 1. SHARED-SAVINGS/SHARED-LOSS CONTRACTS These contracts can be with commercial payers, Medicare Advantage plans, Medicaid health plans, or directly with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through one of their Accountable Care Organization (ACO) programs. Often, these contracts ease health care organizations into risk by delaying the shared-loss component until the second or third contract year. Surplus and deficits are most often shared in equal amounts and often there is a defined maximum for both. 2. FULL OR PARTIAL CAPITATION Under a capitated contract, health care organizations assume full financial risk for providing contracted services. There are rarely limitations to surpluses or deficits such as those seen in shared-risk contracts. This class of contracts was briefly popular in the 1990s, but many health care organizations suffered significant financial loss under these arrangements. Today, they re resurfacing in a few select geographies; however, a slow but cautious return to capitation is underway on a broader level. / 4

3. BUNDLED PAYMENTS The recent rollout in nearly 70 markets of CMS s Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CCJR) program is certain to fuel growth in bundled payments. Since CMS announced its Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative, momentum has grown significantly around bundled payment contracts for government programs and commercial payers. These contracts pay a fixed fee for an entire episode of care. The risk for provider organizations are potential outlier cases. 4. DIRECT TO EMPLOYER CONTRACTS Employers are considering a multitude of new options as they continually seek to control employee medical expenses. One option is to bypass the traditional payers and contract directly with health care providers. While still limited, employers and providers are intrigued by the concept. RISK-SHARING CONTRACT TYPES RISK-ASSUMPTION METHOD CHARACTERISTICS Shared-Saving/ Shared-Loss Contracts Full or Partial Capitation Bundled Payments Direct to Employer Contracts Surplus and deficits are most often shared in equal amounts Often there is a defined maximum for both Health care organizations assume full financial risk for contracted services There are rarely limitations to surpluses or deficits Fixed fee for an entire episode of care Health care providers at risk for outlier cases Employers bypass traditional payers and contract directly with health care providers / 5

5 WAYS HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS MITIGATE RISK For organizations that have invested in the necessary infrastructure, risk-based contracts represent an opportunity to share in the value they have created. However, these arrangements also come with financial risks. Under risk-based models, health care organizations can do much to help ensure their success. Risk-mitigation strategies can include: 1. Using outside experts, such as actuaries, care managers and information technology companies. 2. Incorporating risk-limiting factors into contracts. Examples include downside maximums, trend calculations and attribution methodology. 3. Avoiding unintentional settlement errors by incorporating a results-validation process into the contract. 4. Delaying risk contracting until the necessary infrastructure development and the clinical integration model is proven. 5. Mitigating risk through insurance. / 6

MITIGATING RISK THROUGH INSURANCE While the most effective strategies can reduce the likelihood of a poor result, it is impossible to eliminate it entirely. Most health care organizations have limited tolerance for volatility and insurance is an effective tool in managing that volatility. Health care organizations already in or considering some form of riskbased contracting should investigate insurance options for mitigating risk and helping to accomplish goals. A positive outcome of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 is a revitalization of somewhat stagnant health care service industry. To capitalize on this opportunity, health care system suppliers began innovating solutions for health care organizations. The insurance industry was part of this wave of innovation. New capital and talent flooded the insurance market. The result is many new insurance programs for managing risk in the rapidly evolving health care environment. / 7

RISK-MITIGATION INSURANCE PRODUCTS SPECIFIC EXCESS-OF-LOSS INSURANCE Specific insurance provides protection against the volatility associated with high-dollar or catastrophic claims on individual members. It s intended to address abnormal severity rather than frequency of claims. Catastrophic claims are rising rapidly. Specific excess-of loss coverage terms are very flexible. Organizations with a history of assuming risk and a tolerance for volatility can retain more risk, while organizations new to the risk business should consider transferring more risk to an insurance company. Nationally, the number of individual members with claim payments in excess of $1 million in a single year is estimated to have increased by 75% between 2011 and 2014. Any organization not protected within its contract should consider specific excess-of loss coverage, regardless of population type or size. Even if protection is provided within the contract, canvassing the commercial insurance market for insurance coverage may provide more flexible terms and lower overall cost. AGGREGATE STOP-LOSS INSURANCE Aggregate coverage protects against abnormal claims frequency in the aggregate. Organizations new to risk and/or those wanting to quantify the worst case contract scenario commonly consider this coverage. Aggregate policies allow health care organizations to transfer risk to an insurance company once expenses exceed a certain percentage of the budget. For example, a policy with an attachment point of 105 percent provides protection in the event actual claims exceed 105 percent of the budget. In this case, the organization has limited its risk to five percent of the budget amount. / 8

BUNDLED PAYMENT STOP-LOSS INSURANCE This insurance provides protection from outlier cases for organizations in bundled fee arrangements, whether with CMS or another payer. Bundled payment contracts can take many forms, so this insurance can accommodate many different variables. CHARACTERISTICS OF RISK MITIGATION PRODUCTS RISK- MITIGATION INSURANCE PRODUCTS: PROTECTS AGAINST: FOR HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS UNDER THESE CONTRACT AGREEMENTS: FLEXIBILITY: Specific Excess of Loss Insurance Abnormal severity of individual claims Risk-based contract w/o built in risk protection Flexible based on organization s risk tolerance Aggregate Stop-Loss Insurance Abnormal frequency of claims in the aggregate Risk-based contracts, to limit downside exposure Tailored to organization s budgetary goals Bundled Payment Stop-Loss Insurance Outlier cases whether with CMS or another payer. Any type of bundled payment contracts As flexible as bundled payment contracts are varied / 9

CONCLUSION CMS, state governments, private employers and individuals all expect health care organizations to partake in the challenge to control escalating costs. As risk-based contracting becomes a more common part of the solution, health care organizations need to consider a range of risk-mitigation strategies, including insurance. WHY PARTNER WITH RISK STRATEGIES? Risk Strategies is a privately held, national brokerage and consulting firm. Ranked in the top 25 brokers in the country, we offer riskmanagement advice and insurance and reinsurance placement for property and casualty, health care and employee-benefits risks. The Risk Strategies National Health Care Practice incorporates the experience and expertise of Dubraski & Associates, a national health care specialty broker, and Re-Solutions, one of the largest A&H reinsurance intermediaries in the United States. / 10

A TEAM OF EXPERIENCED INSURANCE PROFESSIONALS TO THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY Working with our national health care practice gives your organization access to one of the largest, most experienced, teams of health care insurance and reinsurance professionals operating across the country under one national profit center. We bring to our health care clients a focused, integrated and responsive liability and risk management service that is best in class, including an analytics group to helping clients better understand their risk and how best to protect that risk, and a proactive claims service center that ensures claim payments are expedited. We deliver experience and innovation to a wide array of health care liability and risk management challenges, including: Specific Excess of Loss Insurance Aggregate Stop-Loss Insurance Bundled Payment Stop-Loss Insurance Provider Excess of Loss Insurance ACO Insurance HMO Reinsurance Employer Self-Funded Stop Loss Insurance Medicare Supplement Insurance Carve-out Programs Managed Care Errors and Omissions Director & Officers Liability Health Care Professional Liability Health Care Property and Casualty Products For more information about Risk Strategies National Health Care Practice please visit www.risk-strategies.com/healthcare / 11