IP DUE DILIGENCE. Mark I. Feldman DLA Piper US LLP (312)

Similar documents
Peter S. Weissman Blank Rome LLP (202)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ISSUES OF THE STARTUP VENTURE. TEIGE P. SHEEHAN, Ph.D.

IP ISSUES IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

Intellectual Property and the Franchising Business Model

TEI School - Houston. Intangible Property ( IP ) - Basics in IP Planning. May 3, 2017

IP ISSUES IN MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

PATENT BOX HOW TO REDUCE UK CORPORATION TAX

Valuation and Due Diligence in Acquiring Intellectual Assets

Due Diligence in Transactions Involving Intellectual Property

THE TWILIGHT ZONE BETWEEN TRADEMARK LICENSING AND FRANCHISING

South Korea. Contributing firm Kim & Chang. Authors Gene Kim Senior Partner In H Kim Foreign Legal Counsel

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

The Recipe for IP Licensing Agreements

Phillip Beutel, Bryan Ray, Steven Schwartz

Fun with IP Clauses in Agreements as Part of Global Strategy to Enable Your Business Model, Financing, and Deal-Making

Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace 2016

2017 Copyright The Sequoia Project. All rights reserved.

Intellectual Property Valuation, Monetization, and Disposition in Bankruptcy

CHAPTER 5 TRADE SECRET LICENSING: ARE YOU ADEQUATELY PROTECTING YOUR MOST PRIZED ASSETS? THE NEED FOR A TRADE SECRET AUDIT IN AN AIA WORLD

Top 11½ Mistakes in License Agreements. Top 11½ Mistakes in License Agreements. Introduction. Explanation of Title. 10. Not Conducting Due Diligence

zspace PROGRAMS MASTER TERMS & CONDITIONS

Transfer pricing and intangible planning

Pirelli Intellectual Property Policy (or IPR) INTRODUCTION

Implications of the America Invents Act for Income Tax Patent Valuations

What Small and Emerging Government Contractors Must Know to Win Business with the U.S. Government, Part 3: Building Contractor Teaming Agreements

Approver: Dr. Robert Steiner Executive Director, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Robert F. Reilly, CPA Willamette Management Associates

Draft Supplement to the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Secured Transactions dealing with security rights in intellectual property

NORDIC ROAD SHOW. United States Legal System for Foreign Investors Lutzker & Lutzker LLP

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: How to Deal with Bankruptcy in Contracts

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

DAVID L. GOING. PARTNER St. Louis, MO

Negotiating and Drafting Patent Indemnification Provisions. October 6, 2011 Ira Schreger Vinson & Elkins LLP

IP Assets and Infringement Claims: Insurance Coverage Considerations What IP Counsel Needs to Know

BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB GLOBAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR HEALTHCARE CONSULTANCY SERVICES (Version dated May 15, 2015)

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

Supported by. Yearbook 2014/2015. A global guide for practitioners. Fish & Richardson PC

Tax Issues Impacting Intellectual Property Transactions 101 & 102

Gene Ferraro, Mazars USA LLP New York, NY William D. James, BKD, LLP St. Louis, MO

A guide to intellectual property and intangible assets

WELCOME TO OUR WEBINAR

Transpacific IP Group Limited

Exhibit D. Valuation Analysis

Case Study: Life Cycle of a Successful VC- Funded Global High-Tech Venture

Doing business in the United States: New York

The Firm. Mission. Clients

UNCITRAL Instruments for MSMEs in Supply Chain Finance

2015 ROBINS KAPLAN LLP

eskbook Emerging Life Sciences Companies second edition

Axosoft Software as a Service Agreement

mew Doc 2896 Filed 03/20/18 Entered 03/20/18 15:26:23 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

Getting Started Legal Considerations

ANNEX III INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

4. List of states or countries in which the Company has offices, employees, a significant customer or otherwise transacts business.

Trading Overseas. Driven by results

GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURES Manual of Policy Directives POLICY NAME: Greenville Health System

Negotiating and Enforcing Complex IP Indemnification Provisions. Eleanor M. Yost Shareholder Carlton Fields Jordan Burt, PA

Business Risk Management Checklist

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS

ROBERTA F. HOWELL AND MARK A. SALZBERG

DATA SHARING AGREEMENT

PURCHASE ORDER TERMS & CONDITIONS

CORNELL STANDARD PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR EXTERNAL COLLABORATIONS (CSP-EC)

IP valuation, exploitation and finance

U.S. Tax Benefits for Exporting

Contracts & Compliance

Customised matching for your business needs. HKTDC Business Matching advantage. What you get. Act NOW

06/22/2017. acceptance by Provider. The terms of this Order also apply to any Corrective Action required by Company pursuant to Section 3 hereof.

Knowledge Development Box Utilising it for maximum benefit

Buying An Existing Business

Tackling the Unique Challenges in a Cross-Border Joint Venture

Cloudscanner Marketplace Terms v.1.0 / October 2016

Third Party Royalties and Licence Fees C O M M E N T A R Y

Transurban Standard Terms and Conditions

Accurate IP valuation in multiple environments

UNIVERSITY LICENSING IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS

Hot News for Financial Index Issuers: Southern District Decision in

Common Errors Committed When Valuing Patents Part 1

Application of Policy This policy applies to all PSU employees.

Are You Prepared for the California Consumer Privacy Act?

TRADEMARK INVESTIGATIONS

Standard Terms & Conditions for Purchase Order

UK Terms & Conditions (for Goods and Services)

Patent Indemnification Provisions Negotiating Indemnification Clauses to Allocate Patent Infringement Risk

Legal DELOITTE TAXLAB Peter Kits & Pim Gerritsen van der Hoop

SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES PATENT AND INVENTION POLICY

By Ian G. DiBernardo and William W. Rosenblatt

Software and Software Tools Ownership and Use Contracting Considerations When Creating Digital, Online and Mobile Content

Introduction. The Political Environment. Political Risk The Political, Legal, and Regulatory Environments of Global Marketing

M&A ACADEMY TECHNOLOGY M&A ISSUES. April 5, 2016 Steve Browne and Laurie Cerveny

GOING GLOBAL AVOIDING THE INADVERTENT FRANCHISE IN U.S. AND INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION

Business Transition Checklist

VALUATION OF TRADEMARKS AS INTANGIBLE ASSETS IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

Important Considerations In Licensing Know-How with Patents

AN INTERNATIONAL JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT CHECKLIST: DEAL POINTS (Revised and Expanded)

Reboots and Restarts: Understanding Tech M&A Transactions in Asia Pacific

Controlling Legal Risk: Business Formation, Taxes and Intellectual Property

Intellectual property rights in Luxembourg (IPR): tax exemption

Right of Publicity: How Much Is Your Client Really Worth? October Weston Anson, Chairman. CONSOR Intellectual Asset Management

DATA SHARING AGREEMENT

Transcription:

IP DUE DILIGENCE Mark I. Feldman DLA Piper US LLP (312) 368-7084 mark.feldman@dlapiper.com

Mark I. Feldman Mark I. Feldman is a partner at the Chicago office of DLA Piper US LLP where he was the national chair of the intellectual property practice group for many years. He is the immediate past president of the Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago. His practice focus on trademarks, patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and Internet and technology law. Mr. Feldman has extensive experience counseling clients on domestic and international intellectual property registration, enforcement and licensing. He was responsible for implementing the worldwide branded ingredient strategy for the famous NutraSweet trademark. Mr. Feldman has written a chapter on Trademark Law for The Franchisor in a course book from the Practicing Law Institute and has published various articles on trademark law in the Franchise Legal Digest. He has been a panelist and speaker on licensing, acquisitions, trademarks and trade regulation issues at a number of legal conferences. Mr. Feldman was ranked by Chambers USA: America s Leading Lawyers for Business-Intellectual Property (2006); nominated by his peers to appear in An International Who s Who of Trademark Lawyers (Law Business Research. Ltd. 2003-2006) and the Guide to the World s Leading Trademark Lawyers (Euromoney, 2002-2006); selected as a Leading Lawyer in intellectual property law by the Leading Lawyers Network in 2003-2006; designated an Illinois Super Lawyer (2005-2006), as the result of research projects conducted jointly by Law & Politics and Chicago magazines; and listed in the 2005 Who s Who Legal: The International Who s Who of Business Lawyers, and the 2007 edition of The Best Lawyers in America-Intellectual Property. 2

INTRODUCTION IP is often the most valuable asset Intangible nature IP often makes it difficult to analyze Gap between IP and corporate law practices complicates the legal transaction Corporate lawyers often lack detailed knowledge of IP law IP lawyers may lack a deep knowledge of corporate transactions for evaluating the IP issues in the context of the overall deal 3

GOALS OF DUE DILIGENCE Due diligence is about identifying, assessing and managing risk Customize the investigation Importance of the IP to the transaction Types of IP and products involved Budget Timing Addresses freedom to operate and exclusivity Helps allocate risk between parties through the negotiating and drafting of the agreement 4

GOALS FROM BUYER S PERSPECTIVE Does target company have any IP problems? Confirm what you are getting (IP audit) Is there anything affecting the target s title in or enforceability of the IP? What third-party rights affect the target s IP? Does anything affect the value of target s IP Due diligence analysis allows buyer to: Draft transaction documents appropriately Restructure deal Re-negotiate price Back out of deal 5

GOAL FROM TARGET S PERSPECTIVE Make sure the agreement you are signing has accurate reps and warranties Seller must represent and warrant that it owns the designated IP But what if copyright was created by an independent contractor who did not assign to Seller? 6

REPS AND WARRANTIES Allocation of risk Qualifiers To its knowledge To the best of its knowledge Material Except as would have a material adverse affect 7

IDENTIFY THIRD-PARTY IP ASSETS Outbound rights Inbound rights Assignability Are IP rights owned by employees or independent contractors Works made for hire Shop rights 8

DUE DILIGENCE STRATEGIES (I) Develop a plan adapted to the facts, business goals, value, and time constraints Prepare Inventory of IP Assets Categorize the IP Assets Wholly owned Encumbered Licensed in or out Third-party IP infringed by Seller Public domain IP used by Seller 9

DUE DILIGENCE STRATEGIES (II) Conduct IP audit to see if target owns its IP, adequately protected it, has rights to use it, and the liability risks Search public records for IP assets Research litigation Internet research Review public filings Request documents for each category of IP Tailored to the transaction Confirm receipt of all documents requested Send follow-up requests if necessary 10

DUE DILIGENCE STRATEGIES (III) Produce final report Explain factual basis for report Data sources Findings Potential issues if transaction proceeds Remedial actions that can lessen or eliminate risks 11

TARGET COMPANY AGREEMENTS Employment agreements Independent contractor agreements Was ownership transferred? 12

FOREIGN PROTECTION Are the IP assets being exploited in other countries? If so, is the IP protected in other countries? Foreign counsel as part of due diligence team Are there licenses outside the U.S.? 13

PATENTS A right to exclude others from making, using, selling, importing For a limited term - 20 years after filing Invention must be NOVEL, USEFUL, NON-OBVIOUS 14

U.S. PATENT Application must be filed within one year of first: Acts in U.S. Public use Sale or offer to sell Acts anywhere Printed publication describing invention Invention patented 15

FOREIGN PATENTS For most of the rest of the world, application must be filed before any public disclosure or use of invention BEST POLICY: FILE FIRST, if possible, to preserve foreign filing rights. Paris Convention priority 1 year from priority application. PCT - delay up to another 18 months 16

TRADEMARK Word, symbol, device, sound or smell which identifies a product/service as coming from a certain source. Also signifies quality level Strength of mark: Arbitrary or coined Suggestive Descriptive Not confusingly similar to third party s mark Other issues: Lawful use FDA issues 17

TRADEMARK RIGHTS Types of Rights: Common law (limited to areas of use) State law (similar to common law) Federal law Foreign Prevent use of confusingly similar marks Term: potentially forever if mark is in use 18

LOSS OF TM RIGHTS Aggressively police use of the mark Abandonment by uncontrolled third party use License with quality control Naked licensing Genericide (from use as noun) Use TM and symbols Lawful use 19

TRADE SECRETS Information which: Is not generally known to others Confers an economic or business advantage Is the subject of reasonable efforts to maintain secrecy Term: potentially perpetual Examples: formulas, manufacturing processes, customer lists Rights Prevent misappropriation Reverse engineering permitted unless contractually prohibited 20

HOW TO SECURE AND MAINTAIN TRADE SECRETS Maintain trade secrets in confidence. Catalog your trade secrets Implement secure procedures for facilities and computer systems Mark information confidential Have nondisclosure agreements signed by third parties before providing sensitive information Require employee nondisclosure agreements, hold training sessions and use an exit interview process 21

Famous IP Protection Mistakes or Problems Patents Monoclonal Antibodies: Failure by British Technology Group to file for patent protection Cohen-Boyer: Patent limited to US because of publication (filed in two weeks to avoid statutory bar in US) Failure to pay maintenance fees Prosecution problems Public use or disclosure Freedom to operate Do they cover current products/business? 22

Trademarks Infringement: ALTOCOR (Andrx) and ADVICOR (Kos) 60 cases of confusion out of 650,000 prescriptions Court found confusingly similar despite PTO and FDA approvals Preliminary injunction ordered. Kos v. Andrx, 369 F.3d 700 (3 Cir. 2004) FDA Approval: Searle s CELEBRA changed to CELEBREX because FDA first approved CELEXA for unrelated product even though Searle s PTO and FDA filings for CELEBRA predated CELEXA Volkswagen: VW paid almost $800 Million to acquire Rolls Royce but learned, after closing, that they did not acquire the ROLLS ROYCE trademark (BMW acquired it) Inadvertent Franchise: Too may controls in trademark license may create a franchise as a matter of law 23

IP Mistakes (II) Ownership: chain of title Ownership: assignability of licenses Ownership: prior employers and corporate opportunity Copyrights: ownership of works by independent contractors 24

IP Bankruptcy Values Trademark: Pan Am $1 million Patents: VPL Labs Sun paid $4 million for virtual reality patents Copyrights: Rhythm and Blues Legend Ronald Isley Financier paid $4.8 Million for Isley s right to receive royalties from Isley Brothers recordings (e.g., Twist and Shout ) 25

Bankruptcy Procedures Automatic stay DIP decision to accept or reject executory contracts Accept: must bring performance current and have reasonable ability to continue to perform Reject: licensee becomes creditor (generally unsecured) 26

IP Licenses as Executory Contracts in Bankruptcy A trustee or DIP must assume or reject any executory contract of the debtor (Bankruptcy Code Section 365(a)) Intellectual property licenses are generally executory contracts: both licensor and licensee usually have continuing obligations 27

Assignment Recordals: Priority Rules Patent (35 U.S.C. 261) and Trademark (15 U.S.C. 1068) First transfer prevails if recorded in PTO within 3 months of its execution or prior to second transfer Second transfer prevails if it is for: Valuable consideration Without notice Prior to recordation of first transfer (except for grace period) 28

Conclusion Start due diligence early It is a critical investment It identifies issues so both parties can best assess the deal, its risks and value Helps avoid future litigation 29 Chgo1\30905648.1