Dallas Independent School District

Similar documents
Municipal Market Update

NCSHA 2018 HFA Institute. Municipal Market Update

Texas Market Update Week of December 10, 2018

Texas Market Update Week of July 9, 2018

Texas Market Update Week of January 21, 2019

National Market Update Week of December 10, 2018

Bond Market Update. 112 th Annual Conference. John Hallacy. Michael Decker. Cindy Harris. Patrick Early. 10:30 12:10 May 7, 2018 Ferrara Theater

Looking at a Variety of Municipal Valuation Metrics

September 9, Geneva Community Unit School District 304, Kane County, Illinois. Update on Debt Restructuring Options

January 25, 2017 Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update Contra Costa Transportation Authority Introduction Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM),

National Market Update Week of January 21, 2019

Economic Calendar. Time CST Release Period

UPDATE ON THE MUNICIPAL BOND MARKET: LANDSCAPE, TRENDS & OPPORTUNITIES

BONDS 101 AND MARKET UPDATE

Fixed Income Update: June 2017

Asset Liability Management Report 4 Q 2018

Municipal Market Update

Orange Unified School District

5-yr Investment Grade Corporate CDS Markit (bps) 500

Division of Bond Finance Interest Rate Calculations. Revenue Estimating Conference Interest Rates Used for Appropriations, including PECO Bond Rates

REFUNDING OPPORTUNITIES IN A RISING RATE ENVIRONMENT

Monthly Mutual Fund Report

April 2014 Investment Report

State and Local Government Debt Since the Financial Crisis

Municipal market: How rates rise matters

2018 Investment and Economic Outlook

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Attachment A Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update October 21, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc. (PFM), financial advisor to the

2013 Hot Topics in Higher Education Finance

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

Capital Markets Overview ACI-NA Finance Committee Meeting

East Sandoval County Arroyo Flood Control Authority ( ESCAFCA )

Monthly Mutual Fund Report

Municipal Finance Healthcare Group Weekly Update

Muni Fortnightly. Treasury curve bear-flattens on tax policy advancement and Flynn plea. Munis generally underperform.

4th - Asian Fixed Income Summit Investing in Asia s Fixed Income Market

Financial Markets & Debt Portfolio Update August 23, 2016 Introduction Public Financial Management Inc., (PFM), financial advisor to the Contra Costa

Muni Fortnightly. December 18, 2017

Trends & Long-Term Outlook for Fixed and Stable Value Funds

Peru: Capital Market and Infrastructure Themes

Angel Oak Capital Advisors, LLC

Fixed Income Portfolio Management

Municipal Market: How Rates Rise Matters

Mexico s Fixed Income Markets

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CALIFORNIA PUBLIC FINANCE ROADSHOW

Moving On Up Investing in Today s Rate Environment

Federal Bank BUY. Performance Highlights. Target Price. 1QFY2018 Result Update Banking. Stock Info Sector

High Dividend Stocks In Rising Interest Rate Environments

The total return for ibonds ETFs that have matured was within 3 to 21 bps from the initial yield less fund expenses at inception.

Ohlone Community College District

Santa Margarita Water District

Mark to Market. The Impact of Interest Rate Changes on Portfolio Market Value. John F. Grady III Managing Director February 2, 2018

CALLABLE BONDS: FRIEND AND FOE GIOA INVESTMENT CONFERENCE George E.A. Barbar Mesirow Financial William M. Quinn, CFA FTN Financial

Fund (An open ended debt scheme predominantly investing in debt instruments of Banks, Public Sector Undertakings & Public Financial Institutions)

Monthly Market Update August 2016

Factors Impacting Investment Opportunities. Market Environment. Agenda. Economic Update and Investment Tips

Hays Consolidated Independent School District

Municipal Market Weekly Ramirez Municipal Strategy

Market Update Overview of Market Conditions & California Land- Secured Sector Update. February 17, 2017

SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA SERIES 2014 TAN SALE

Investment Grade Fixed Income Review

HFC NEUTRAL. Performance Highlights CMP. `678 Target Price - 1QFY2013 Result Update HFC. Investment Period - Key financials

FIXED INCOME UPDATE 1

CDO Market Overview & Outlook. CDOs in the Heartland. Lang Gibson Director of Structured Credit Research March 25, 2004

2018 The year of promise

Russell 2000 Index Options

Visaka Industries Ltd

FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs equity market capitalization = $986.8 billion

Bonds 101. Michigan Association of School Boards. November 10, PFM Financial Advisors LLC. 555 Briarwood Circle Suite 333

June 26, Geneva Community Unit School District Number 304, Kane County, Illinois. Financing Update

Moving On Up Today s Economic Environment

Market and Economic Charts. Retail Fund Management Team Investec Asset Management

Municipal Bond Monthly Market Strategy

Amber Enterprises India Ltd

December Employment Report: Further Deterioration of Labor Market Conditions January 9, 2009

Data current as of: April 4, % 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 250, , , ,000 50, , , , , ,000

Industrial orders, Nov'18, y/y (WDA) -2.7% Industrial production, Nov'18, y/y (WDA) -0.8% Industrial production, Nov'18, y/y 5.0%

Dallas Austin Chicago Houston Miami New York San Antonio San Diego

LOAN MARKET DATA AND ANALYTICS BY THOMSON REUTERS LPC

Report to the Finance Committee 2018 Year End Review. MTA Finance Department Patrick McCoy, Director January 22, 2019

CLOs Today. Moderator: Meredith Coffey, LSTA

Palm Beach County School District

Municipal Bonds v. U.S. Treasury & Corporate Bonds December 3, 2018 JR Rieger (516) straighttalkaboutbonds.

Interest Sensitive Fixed Income Market Data

The Greek Bond Market in 2007

Looking to the medium term

Cavanal Hill Fixed Income Insights 1 st Quarter, 2018

2017 Tax Cuts & Jobs Act Summary & Implementing Legislation Impacting Facilities Financing for Community Colleges

Loan Pricing Structure and the Nature of Interest Rates

EUROPEAN LEVERAGED LOAN MARKET IMPACT OF THE CREDIT CRISIS

A Compelling Case for Leveraged Loans

Axis Corporate Debt Fund. (An open ended debt scheme predominantly investing in AA+ and above rated corporate bonds)

State of the Muni Markets

Municipal Bonds. Mid-Atlantic Association for Financial Professionals. Municipal Capital Markets Group September 17, 2014

Of Interest: Fixed Income Strategy Weekly Fixed Income Strategy

Economic and Financial Markets Monthly Review & Outlook Detailed Report January 2018

Market Impact of TLAC Requirements. FIG DCM Bank Capital Solutions

Bond Election is called by the Board of Trustees Bonds are authorized by the voters Bonds are sold

Interest Sensitive Fixed Income Market Data

Portola Valley School District

Transcription:

Dallas Independent School District Municipal Market Update, Outstanding Debt Profile and Preliminary Growth Rate/Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis for November 2015 Bond Election October 6, 2015

Disclaimer Disclaimer: By acceptance of these materials, and notwithstanding any other express or implied agreement, arrangement, or understanding to the contrary, RBC Capital Markets, LLC ( RBCCM ), Estrada Hinojosa & Co., its affiliates, and the recipient agree that the recipient (and its employees, representatives, and other agents) may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind from the commencement of discussions, the tax treatment, structure or strategy of the transaction and any fact that may be relevant to understanding such treatment, structure or strategy, and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to the recipient relating to such tax treatment, structure, or strategy. The information and any analyses contained in this presentation are taken from, or based upon, information obtained from the recipient or from publicly available sources, the completeness and accuracy of which has not been independently verified, and cannot be assured by RBCCM or Estrada Hinojosa. The information and any analyses in these materials reflect prevailing conditions and RBCCM s and Estrada Hinojosa s views as of this date, all of which are subject to change. To the extent projections and financial analyses are set forth herein, they may be based on estimated financial performance prepared by or in consultation with the recipient and are intended only to suggest reasonable ranges of results. The printed presentation is incomplete without reference to the oral presentation or other written materials that supplement it. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: RBCCM, Estrada Hinojosa & Co., and its affiliates do not provide tax advice and nothing contained herein should be construed as tax advice. Any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained herein (including any attachments) (i) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties; and (ii) was written in connection with the promotion or marketing of the matters addressed herein. Accordingly, you should seek advice based upon your particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. 1

Table of Contents 1. Municipal Market Update 2. Outstanding Debt 3. Preliminary Growth Rate/Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis for November 2015 Bond Election 2

Municipal Market Update SECTION 1

Long-Term Market Market Overview Marco Market Overview Municipal GO AAA MMD Yield Curve Changes Equity markets worldwide initially sold off when the weak jobs report was released on Friday. However there was a large turnaround as the day went on, and stocks ended up on the day. The markets apparently came to the view, for one day at least, that weak economic news is good because it could work to keep the Fed on hold into 2016 with any plan to start increasing its short-term interest rate targets. For the week as a whole, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 Index both increased 1%, while the NASDAQ was up 0.5%. Equities had a tough third quarter, with both the Dow Jones and the S&P declining 7%. Treasury yields declined the entire week, giving up some of those gains on Friday as stocks recovered, but still finished with lower yields for the day. For the week as a whole, the yield on the 10-yr bond was down 17bps (closing on Friday at less than 2%), and the yield on the 30-yr bond was down 13bps. 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Year 09/30/2015 09/30/2014 Municipal Market Overview Municipal bond yields decreased last week, underperforming the sharp decreases in yield experienced by Treasuries. Muni yields on the Municipal Market Data (MMD) AAA GO curve decreased by between 8bps and 11bps for maturities of 10-yrs and longer. Historically, Munis have underperformed Treasuries on sharp Treasury rallies, and then sometimes made up the lost ground in coming trading days. The market was aided in September by the decline in new issue volume, which was $18.3bn for the month, down by 27% from the $25.2bn in September of 2014. This upcoming week sees a return to a more robust new issue calendar, with more than $8bn in new issues slated to sell. Municipal bond mutual funds saw outflows during the week, basically reversing the inflows seen in the previous week. According to data from Lipper, overall funds saw outflows of $252mm for the week vs. $231mm of inflows in the previous week. U.S. Treasury Yield Curve Changes 3.50% 3.00% 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 3 mo 6 mo 1 yr 2 yr 3 yr 5 yr 7 yr 10 yr 15 yr 20 yr 30 yr 09/30/2015 09/30/2014 Source: Bloomberg and Thomson Municipal Market Data 4

Current Municipal Market Conditions: AAA MMD After closing at 3.10% the previous week, the 30-year AAA MMD decreased by 8 bps from September 25 October 2 to a current rate of 3.02% AAA MMD January 1, 2007 to Present Shift in AAA MMD Since September 2014 6.000% 5.000% 4.000% 3.500% 3.300% 3.100% 2.900% 2.700% 2.500% 3.000% 2.300% 2.100% 2.000% 1.900% 1.700% 1.000% Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15 10 Yr 20 Yr 30 Yr 1.500% Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan FebMar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct January 1, 2007 to Present 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year Maximum Minimum Current 4.860% 1.470% 1.980% 5.740% 2.100% 2.760% 5.940% 2.470% 3.020% Shift in 30-year "AAA" MMD 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 0.790% -0.900% 0.520% -1.130% -0.740% 1.330% -1.340% September 2, 2014 to Present 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year Maximum 2.380% 3.110% 3.360% Minimum 1.720% 2.350% 2.500% Average 2.110% 2.792% 3.016% Source: TM3, Thomson Reuters 10, 20, and 30 year AAA MMD shown to represent different average lives of municipal transactions Rates as of October 2, 2015 5

Bond Buyer 20 General Obligation Bond Index 54 Year Historical Perspective Bond Buyer 20 GO Index since January 1961 % of Time in Each Range Since 1961 14.0% Bond Buyer 20 GO Bond Index Today's Rate at 3.67% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% Yield Range Less than 3.50% 8.86% 3.50% - 4.00% 7.81% 4.01% - 4.50% 11.24% 4.51% - 5.00% 10.57% 5.01% - 5.50% 14.74% 5.51% - 6.00% 10.26% 6.01% - 6.50% 7.95% 6.51% - 7.00% 7.25% 7.01% - 7.50% 6.55% 7.51% - 8.00% 3.85% Greater than 8.00% 10.96% Total 100.00% 2.0% 0.0% Source: Bloomberg as of October 1, 2015 Weekly yields and indexes released by the Bond Buyer. Updated every Thursday at approximately 6:00pm EST. 20 Bond General Obligation Yield with 20 year maturity, rated AA2 by Moody's Arithmetic Average of 20 bonds' yield to maturity. Today s 3.68% level is lower than 89.85% of historical rates since January 1961 6

RBC Economic Outlook Municipal Supply in 2014: $334 billion RBC Municipal Supply Forecast for 2015: $335 billion ($303 billion YTD) The Current Market: US equities gained last week, with the DJIA and SPX advancing 1% and the Nasdaq rising 0.45%. August payrolls were revised lower, and the unemployment rate held at 5.1%. UST10 yield hit an intra-day low of 1.90% on Friday morning (-13bp) but retraced gains to close at 1.99% (-4bp). Municipal supply averaged $4.7bn per week in September, totaling $23.5bn for the month. New-issue volume totaled $6.3bn last week and will rise to $10.3bn this week. Investors continue to direct the majority of their cash and focus to the primary market versus the secondary. US Treasuries: 10 year: 2.45% forecasted for end of 2015 (1.99% as of Oct. 2, 2015) 30 year: 3.20% forecasted for end of 2015 (2.82% as of Oct. 2, 2015) RBC Economic Outlook and Interest Rate Forecasts (1) Q3'15 Q4'15 Q1'16 Q2'16 Q3'16 Q4'16 Real GDP (QoQ) 3.00 2.90 3.00 2.80 3.00 2.70 Core Inflation (YoY) 1.80 2.00 2.10 2.00 2.00 2.10 Unemployment 5.20 5.10 5.10 5.10 5.00 5.00 IOER (2) 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.75 2-Year Notes 0.75 1.05 1.30 1.60 1.80 2.15 5-Year Notes 1.50 1.80 1.95 2.15 2.35 2.50 10-Year Notes 2.10 2.45 2.60 2.80 3.00 3.15 30-Year Bonds 2.90 3.20 3.30 3.40 3.60 3.75 Markets Have Experienced Significant Volatility Over the Last Year 4.50 4.00 30 Year MMD: 3.02% as of 10/02/15 30 Year Treasury: 2.82% as of 10/02/15 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 10/2/14 11/2/14 12/2/14 1/2/15 2/2/15 3/2/15 4/2/15 5/2/15 6/2/15 7/2/15 8/2/15 9/2/15 10/2/15 (1) RBC Rate and Economic Forecast as of October 2, 2015. (2) Interest on Excess Reserves RBC expects IOER, not the Fed Funds effective rate, to be the targeted policy rate in the initial stages of the tightening cycle. 7

Outstanding Debt SECTION 2

2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 Debt Service ($000s) Outstanding Debt Debt by Principal & Interest Dallas Independent School District Outstanding Debt by Principal & Interest 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Principal Interest FYE (8/31) Principal Interest Total 2016 $ 96,975,000 $ 119,091,210 $ 216,066,210 2017 64,630,000 114,813,829 179,443,829 2018 69,680,000 111,313,105 180,993,105 2019 73,455,000 107,834,569 181,289,569 2020 78,315,000 104,297,245 182,612,245 2021 85,555,000 100,634,748 186,189,748 2022 88,120,000 96,998,759 185,118,759 2023 94,305,000 92,957,100 187,262,100 2024 100,885,000 88,202,730 189,087,730 2025 105,195,000 82,835,169 188,030,169 2026 111,165,000 77,542,128 188,707,128 2027 118,905,000 72,475,375 191,380,375 2028 125,285,000 66,451,598 191,736,598 2029 129,830,000 59,961,250 189,791,250 2030 141,415,000 52,520,403 193,935,403 2031 148,025,000 46,017,244 194,042,244 2032 156,580,000 38,298,418 194,878,418 2033 168,490,000 28,713,491 197,203,491 2034 169,950,000 18,416,263 188,366,263 2035 193,165,000 6,229,571 199,394,571 Total $ 2,319,925,000 $ 1,485,604,201 $ 3,805,529,201 9

Outstanding Debt Debt by Series FYE (8/31) School Building Bonds, Series 2006 School Building Bonds, Series 2008 Refunding Bonds, Series 2010 Refunding Bonds, Series 2010B Dallas Independent School District Outstanding Debt Service by Series School Building Bonds Taxable, Series 2010C Refunding Bonds, Series 2011 Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Refunding Bonds Taxable, Series 2012A Refunding Bonds, Series 2014 Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 Total Annual Debt Service 2016 $ 8,725,600 $ 6,695,263 $ 16,698,725 $ 10,034,550 $ 58,161,423 $ 25,299,350 $ 25,943,750 $ 3,272,550 $ 38,499,350 $ 22,735,650 $ 216,066,210 2017 7,790,719 6,670,825 28,979,188 58,161,423 12,407,975 28,684,150 3,695,300 14,839,350 18,214,900 179,443,829 2018 8,153,556 20,305,300 27,038,663 61,046,786 10,948,600 23,703,150 2,933,550 17,904,350 8,959,150 180,993,105 2019 26,945,800 84,257,969 10,967,725 24,092,400 2,865,300 17,356,100 14,804,275 181,289,569 2020 26,142,425 85,874,520 10,940,100 23,734,150 2,937,550 17,947,600 15,035,900 182,612,245 2021 29,166,900 77,211,148 23,196,600 20,953,650 2,663,300 24,665,750 8,332,400 186,189,748 2022 77,646,334 29,059,725 31,096,050 4,069,550 25,575,000 17,672,100 185,118,759 2023 76,308,975 27,674,225 32,671,050 4,107,800 38,368,250 8,131,800 187,262,100 2024 76,361,105 23,932,975 33,816,300 4,442,800 42,402,750 8,131,800 189,087,730 2025 76,025,744 24,046,350 33,687,900 4,461,000 25,663,000 24,146,175 188,030,169 2026 77,953,253 21,993,100 34,527,700 4,578,400 25,364,500 24,290,175 188,707,128 2027 77,779,150 21,776,675 34,770,700 4,545,800 46,068,250 6,439,800 191,380,375 2028 76,122,723 22,524,375 33,932,900 4,658,800 48,058,000 6,439,800 191,736,598 2029 75,705,500 56,488,650 4,656,400 29,101,000 23,839,700 189,791,250 2030 74,915,353 57,063,650 4,717,800 4,090,000 53,148,600 193,935,403 2031 81,156,294 41,431,750 5,985,200 4,090,000 61,379,000 194,042,244 2032 129,003,218 33,480,000 32,395,200 194,878,418 2033 162,607,991 34,595,500 197,203,491 2034 160,194,763 28,171,500 188,366,263 2035 199,394,571 199,394,571 Total $ 8,725,600 $ 22,639,538 $ 125,929,975 $ 66,052,400 $ 1,845,888,239 $ 264,767,775 $ 536,597,900 $ 64,591,100 $ 516,240,250 $ 354,096,425 $ 3,805,529,201 10

2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 Debt Service ($000s) Outstanding Debt Debt by Series 250,000 Series 2006 Series 2008 Series 2010 Series 2010B Series 2010C Series 2011 Series 2012 Series 2012A Series 2014 Series 2015 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 11

Preliminary Growth Rate/Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis for November 2015 Bond Election SECTION 3

Growth Rate/Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis - Background The School Board called an election for November 2015 in the amount of $1,600,000,000 (the 2015 Bond Authorization ). As part of the discussion on the potential tax rate impact of this election, administration presented its projections of future tax base growth to substantiate its belief that the full authorization could be issued without an increase in the District s existing debt tax (Interest & Sinking Fund or I&S tax) rate. Separately, administration has requested a Sensitivity analysis to determine the minimum levels of growth that must be achieved to meet the goal of maintaining the existing I&S tax rate of 24.2 cents. That is the purpose of this presentation. It is important to note that there are a variety of factors that impact the tax rate. These include the existing tax base and the projected growth in that tax base(the subject of this analysis); and a number of other factors including but not limited to: The structure of the bonds meaning whether the bonds are long-term fixed rate bonds or some form of shorter term variable rate bonds, market conditions at the time of issuance, total amount of bonds issued, available surplus I&S fund balances to manage the tax rate and still other factors. In order to focus specifically on the issue of the minimum growth rates required to meet the target, assumptions must be made to hold all the other factors constant. In that regard, administration required that the most conservative assumptions be made in regards to those factors: Fixed rate long-term current interest bonds This analysis shows two scenarios; one at a 20-year final maturity and the other at a 30-year final maturity. Note that State Law permits the issuance of bonds with up to 40-year final maturities but administration does not wish to consider such an option as it would have a negative impact on the total amount of interest paid on an issue. Relatively high interest rate assumptions The current market interest rates for a 20-year fixed rate Aaa/AAA/AAA rated Permanent School Fund guaranteed bond issue is approximately 3.30%. For purposes of this analysis, we have assumed an interest rate of 4.5% for the 20-year scenario and 5.0% for the 30-year scenario. Issuance of the total amount of authorization (if approved by the voters) of $1,600,000,000 over 4 years as follows: $400,000,000 in FY 2016, $600,000,000 in FY 2018 and $600,000,000 in FY 2020. If the projected growth rate assumptions are not realized, the actual sale of bonds could be delayed somewhat to allow additional time for growth. It should be noted that the structures assumed for this analysis are for the sole purpose of determining the minimum tax base growth rates required. This should not be taken as a Plan of Finance or a commitment to adopt a specific plan of action. Final structuring decisions will be made at the time of issuance and will be based on a combination of factors including targeting the existing tax rate (no tax rate increase); lowering overall interest expense to the District and its tax payers and maintaining reasonable levels of flexibility to manage potential unforeseen circumstances. All assumptions are preliminary and subject to change. 13

Growth Rate/Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis Summary of Financial Findings for Minimal Required TAV Growth Scenarios 2015 Bond Authorization Description Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Amortization Period 20 Years 30 Years Bond Installments Three Sales Three Sales Final Maturity 2040 2050 Resulting Tax Rate Structure Maintained Maintained Outstanding Debt Service Base Year* $3,805,529,201 $3,804,329,201 Plus: Projected New Debt Service 2,713,140,345 3,412,990,025 Total Projected Outstanding Debt Service $6,518,669,546 $7,217,319,226 Base Year I&S Tax Rate (FY2015/16) $0.2420 $0.2420 Projected I&S Tax Rate Following Bond Election $0.2420 $0.2420 Increase from Bond Election $0.0000 $0.0000 Tax Increase on Taxable Home Value Year 1 Annual Tax Increase Per Homeowner $0.00 $0.00 Year 1 Monthly Tax Increase Per Homeowner $0.00 $0.00 Year 2 Annual Tax Increase Per Homeowner $0.00 $0.00 Year 2 Monthly Tax Increase Per Homeowner $0.00 $0.00 Total Tax Increase over Base Year $0.00 $0.00 *Assumes the base year outstanding debt service is reduced in FY2035 from utilizing assumed surplus I&S Fund balances in the amount of $1.2 million collected for purposes of prior debt for Scenario 2. 14

Growth Rate/Tax Rate Sensitivity Analysis Statement of Assumptions General Assumptions: Bond election in November 2015 for authorization amount of $1,600,000,000 (the 2015 Bond Authorization ). The District issues the 2015 Bond Authorization in three sales - $400,000,000 in FY 2016, $600,000,000 in FY 2018 and $600,000,000 in FY 2020. Fixed rate current interest bond structures. The tax rate is calculated based on estimated Taxable Assessed Valuations (these numbers vary depending on growth rate assumptions). Assumes a tax collection rate of 98.75%. The District s 2015/16 taxable assessed valuation ( TAV ) is $91,173,603,390, which reflects a 6.47% increase over 2014/15. This value is based on the certified report from Dallas Central Appraisal District and takes into account the possible new homestead exemption level of $25,000 that will be voted on in November 2015. All new money bonds are sold based on the underlying rating of the District (Aa1/AA/AA+) with the enhancement of the Texas Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program (Aaa/AAA/AAA). Ratings shown in order of Moody s/s&p/fitch. Scenario One: The maximum maturity for each bond sale will be 20 years from the respective bond sale dates noted above. An interest rate of 4.50% for each bond sale. RESULT OF ANALYSIS: TAV growth of 6.0% in 2016/17, 3.50% growth in 2017/18, 3.0% growth in 2018/19, 2.50% growth in 2019/20 and 2020/21, 2.0% growth in 2021/22 through 2023/24, 1.50% growth in 2024/25 through 2026/27, and 0.50% growth thereafter. Scenario Two: The maximum maturity for each bond sale will be 30 years from the respective bond sale date. An interest rate of 5.00% for each bond sale. The currently existing debt service shown is reduced in FY2035 by $1.2 million utilizing surplus Interest & Sinking (I&S) fund balances in the amount of $1.2 million collected for purposes of prior debt. RESULT OF ANALYSIS: TAV growth of 6.0% in 2016/17, 3.50% growth in 2017/18 through 2019/20, 2.50% growth in 2020/21, 1.00% growth in 2021/22 through 2023/24 and constant (zero %) thereafter. All assumptions are preliminary and subject to change. 15