How to select, prioritize, & justify economically viable energy projects

Similar documents
Energy Efficiency Simple, Safe Investment. Tim Gasper, PE Brady Energy Services (919)

ECE 333 Green Electric Energy

The Real Meaning of Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

Richmond Building Energy Challenge

2009 ENERGY EFFICIENCY INDICATOR

August EEAC Small Business Offerings & Services. August 16, 2017

CUSTOMER BENEFITS. buildingrenewal.org

For the Instructor: Teaching Note on Green Lights Economics: Graphic Design Considers a Lighting Upgrade

Lecture in Energy Economics: Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Bankable Projects in Sustainable Energy

Saving Money On Electricity Bills With Solar

Solar is a Bright Investment

RENOVATE AMERICA GREEN BOND PRE-ISSUANCE REVIEW

AGENDA RI-PACE AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY FURTHERING EERMC S GOALS. What is C-PACE. What is it? Growing C-PACE Market

Part 2 Financial Metrics and Rates of Return

Capital Budgeting Decisions

Building Systems and Performance: an Introduction to Building Operator Certification Lesson 19: Energy Audits

PACE Financing. J. Caleb Bell, Partner Bricker & Eckler LLP

Pamwin Component Accounting User Manual December 2009

The Business Case For Energy Efficiency Viridian Glass Australia

Financing for Energy & Sustainability

What Is a Project? How Do We Justify a Project? 1.011Project Evaluation: Comparing Costs & Benefits Carl D. Martland

FIVE YEAR PLAN FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY

EEAC EM&V Briefing. Ralph Prahl EEAC Consultant EM&V Team Leader July 9th, 2013

False Dilemmas, Energy Projects and Value Creation

1.011Project Evaluation: Comparing Costs & Benefits

U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Public and Indian Housing

School Board of Palm Beach County

2003 ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS TECHNICAL APPENDIX

The Energiesprong concept is based on the assumption that the capital investment required to deliver net-zero-energy refurbishments is covered by:

Executive Director s Summary Report

Sustainable investments in real estate development and trends. The Fund Manager Perspective

Property Assessed Clean Energy Programs and How PACE Can Benefit Your Community

Innovative Tools for Estimating Robust Non-Energy Impacts that Enhance Cost-Effectiveness Testing and Marketing of Energy Efficiency Programs

Anthony Martin, PE, LEED AP Business Development Manager - Texas

APPLICATIONS Life Cycle Costing for HVAC Systems

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND LIFE CYCLE COSTING SECTION I

Net Zero Energy Feasibility Study Summary report

Solutions for Financing Local Government PV Projects September Nick Hylla, Executive Director Midwest Renewable Energy Association

Six Ways to Perform Economic Evaluations of Projects

Green Income Tax Incentives. By Colleen M. Berndt, CPA Meyers Brothers Kalicka, P.C. MBKCPA.COM

Project Evaluation. Carl D. Martland Senior Research Associate Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering

A billing mechanism to apply compensation to individual subscriber bills

Ibrahim Sameer (MBA - Specialized in Finance, B.Com Specialized in Accounting & Marketing)

The nature of investment decision

Prioritization of Climate Change Adaptation Options. The Role of Cost-Benefit Analysis

Performance & Financial Analysis

Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques 93. Chapter 7: Capital Budgeting Process and Techniques

Program Update Home Efficiency Program, Income Qualified

Cost Data in Decision Making

AMERESCO INVESTOR PRESENTATION JANUARY 2019

Economics of Distributed Resources

Economics of Distributed Resources

Yale Property Example

Exhibit DAS-1. Tucson Electric Power Company Demand-Side Management Program Portfolio Plan

1.133 M.Eng. Concepts of Engineering Practice Fall 2007

Natural Gas Avoided Cost Meeting. 10 a.m. 12 p.m. May 12, 2017

Profitability Estimates

S p r i n g F e r r y E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l

Grosse Pointe Public School System Facilities Town Halls. Spring 2018 Defer Elementary

The Business Case For Energy Upgrades

Rooftop Solar PV System Designers and Installers. Training Curriculum. APEC Secretariat

All In One MGT201 Mid Term Papers More Than (10) BY

Energy Efficiency Insurance. Product overview

Contractor Update September 1, 2012

PRESENTATION DOCUMENT

Asset Management and Energy Initiatives. Kathleen Berube Sustainable Development Manager

UNIDO EnMS Expert Training Module 1 Day 3. Trainers Location

MGT201 Lecture No. 11

International Project Management. prof.dr MILOŠ D. MILOVANČEVIĆ

It Don t Mean a Thing Without Good Marketing!! Marketing Solar for Agricultural Uses

FINAL ENERGY AUDIT. Nikolaevsk School Nikolaevsk Road. Nikolaevsk, AK ATTN: Kevin Lyon

USING LIFE CYCLE COSTING AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TO SELL GREEN BUILDING FEATURES

Implementing a Residential PACE Program

Energy Efficiency Portfolio Implementation Plan

Economic and Financial Viability in RE Projects

Revenue Requirement Application. 2004/05 and 2005/06. Volume 2. Appendix I. Power Smart 10-Year Plan

Contractor Guide. (314)

To: Mayor and City Council Through: Bill Monahan, City Manager. Subject: Proceeding with the ESCO Process

Province-Wide Whole Home Pilot Program Design: IESO response to input received

TEP Guarantee Program Tucson Electric Power

Conveying vs. Trucking Economics For Medium Sized Applications

Session 2, Monday, April 3 rd (11:30-12:30)

MGT201 Current Online Solved 100 Quizzes By

FortisBC Energy Inc. (FEI) Project No Demand Side Management Expenditures Plan (the Application) Errata dated September 20, 2018

Manufacturing/shop facility 5/20/2015

Steps to Success. Energy Efficiency Loans in Wales Applicant Supporting Information. Updated May 2018

COMPARING ALTERNATIVES

Why Real Estate Investing???

DTE Energy Multifamily Program


Economic Analysis Concepts

Can Simple Payback Justify Building Energy Improvements?

Disclaimer: This resource package is for studying purposes only EDUCATIO N

Energy Efficiency (EE) Financing Strategies and Considerations in Commercial Real Estate

Investment Primer. For Green Revolving Funds. Dano Weisbord Principal Author. Mark Orlowski Contributing Author. Sustainable Endowments Institute

Energy Efficiency Resource Ramping Assumptions

MENG 547 Energy Management & Utilization

KING FAHAD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS COLLEGE OF ENVIROMENTAL DESGIN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT

REELIH FINANCIAL MODELING OPTIONS FOR FINANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES IN TUZLA CANTON

A Utility Perspective: Subsidized Projects How Much Should You Pay?

Transcription:

How to select, prioritize, & justify economically viable energy projects Eileen Westervelt, Senior Energy Engineer U of I Business Presenter s Innovation name Services; Professional Naperville, Title (eg. IL architect/energy 10.30.12 specialist..) Smart Energy Design Assistance Center (SEDAC), University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Providing effective strategies for public and private buildings in Illinois

Economics Brings Context to Grand Efficiency Plans We tend to get started with energy efficiency w/ a Let s Go Green enthusiasm windmill, solar panel, green roof - Sticker shock can cause a stall or derailing of efforts. - There is a time and place for windmills, usually not first

Outline Start with option and impact table Select your projects Prioritize projects Justify projects

Sample Options and Impact Table Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Natural Gas (therms) Building Energy (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) Lighting 274,500 150 0 5% $28,524 $107,000 24% $72,870 3.8 Heat pump -4,009 5.6 3,320 30% $2,919 $148,515 2% ($88,000) 50.9 Boiler 0 0 6,729 16% $7,572 $45,000 14% $12,287 5.9 Window #1 7,827 0 4,539 21% $4,336 $244,530-8% ($207,618) 56.0 Window #2 46,289 29 8,022 11% $9,861 $123,750 5% ($819) 13.0 Roof Insulation 6,003 1.4 840 6% $1,598 $20,136 17% $4,454 12.6 T-Stat 2254 0 902 8% $1206 $600 201% 9,705 0.5 VSD 31,166 7 0 2.8% $3,445 $20,000 15% $45,000 5.8 What to do? What first? Priorities?

Outline Start with option and impact table Select/Screen your projects Prioritize projects Justify projects

Select Projects for Further Consideration - Key Ideas 1. Instead of first cost, look at life cycle 2. Set and screen for criteria that matches your business model (cash flow, MARR, planning horizon) 3. Consider overriding criteria (comfort)

Select Projects First blush desires: Low First Cost Quick payback Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Building Natural Gas Energy (therms) (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) But first cost screening doesn t capture the nature of energy projects

Select Projects: Recognize the long term nature of energy projects Project Life: Lighting, Controls (~10yrs) Envelope, HVAC Equipment (~25yrs) Benefits returned over many years $30,000 $25,000 $176,695 $135,887 $20,000 $15,000 First Cost $10,000 Operations $5,000 $0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Select Projects: Recognize the long term nature of energy projects Life Cycle Cost Analysis More fitting, comprehensive approach than first cost Accounts for Time value of money Lifetime of projects (laptop vs. roof) Persistence of savings SEDAC Level 3 assessments includes life cycle cost analysis (available on larger projects), Level 2 quantifies energy savings.

Select Projects: to set criteria, review your business model Cash flow Planning horizon (long or short haul) Discount rate (self determined time value of money) Typically 5% public, 10% private institution Minimum acceptable rate of return (get real)

Select Projects: Example Other Investments Type APR Time commitment RISK Prime Rate 3.25% n/a n/a Savings Account 0.50% None low 1 year CD 0.75% 1 year Low 5 year CD 1.40% 5 year Low 24% 1 year S&P 500, average 38% 3 year -5% 5 year Med/high Energy Efficiency Loan 5% Varies Med

Select Projects: Investment Horizons help ID target projects Quick SPB Longer SPB ECRM Computer Power Mgt. Programmable T- Stat Typical Simple Payback (Median-Average) <1yr Lifetime 1-5 yrs 0.2-1 yr 10 yrs Boiler Tune Up 1 yr 1-2 yrs Motion Sensors 2-3 yrs 10 yrs Sealing 2-4 yrs 3-5 yrs Lighting 4-3 yrs 10 yrs HVAC replacement 7-14 yrs 20 yrs Insulation 7-16 yrs 25 yrs Window Films 8-10 yrs 10 yrs Windows 8-21 yrs 25 yrs Renewable Energy 30-20 yrs 25 yrs

Select Projects: Choosing Economic Indicators Meaning Example Simple Payback (SPB) # of years to recoup capital from annual savings 5 year simple payback Simple Cash Flow Annual Saving finance costs Net Present Value (NPV) Total value of project in today's dollars Net annual cost $1.5 million NPV 10% IRR Internal Rate of Return (IRR & ROI) Annual interest yield of project during its lifetime Criteria Payback < n years Positive cash flow vs negative Positive indicates profitable project IRR > discount rate Comment Misleading Ignores financing & long-term cash flows Use when cash is tight Real flow of money Looks at strategies in financing timeframe Good Measure User must specify discount rate Long time horizon Can be fooled when cash flow goes positivenegative-positive Shorter horizon

Select Projects: Set Criteria Common Thresholds on Economic Indicators: IRR> discount rate (maybe > finance rate) NPV>0 (Monetary value added to organization) Positive cash flow in X years Overrides for Essential Services (heating, lighting, comfort)

Select Projects: ID: Go/No-Go/Hold Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Natural Gas (therms) Building Energy (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) Lighting 274,500 150 0 5% $28,524 $107,000 24% $72,870 3.8 Heat pump -4,009 5.6 3,320 30% $2,919 $148,515 2% ($88,000) 50.9 Boiler 0 0 6,729 16% $7,572 $45,000 14% $12,287 5.9 Window #1 7,827 0 4,539 21% $4,336 $244,530-8% ($207,618) 56.0 Window #2 46,289 29 8,022 11% $9,861 $123,750 5% ($819) 13.0 Roof Insulation 6,003 1.4 840 6% $1,598 $20,136 17% $4,454 12.6 T-Stat 2254 0 902 8% $1206 $600 201% 9,705 0.5 VSD 31,166 7 0 2.8% $3,445 $20,000 15% $45,000 5.8

Select Projects: Sample Options Selected (short list) Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Natural Gas (therms) Building Energy (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) Lighting 274,500 150 0 5% $28,524 $107,000 24% $72,870 3.8 Boiler 0 0 6,729 16% $7,572 $45,000 14% $12,287 5.9 T-Stat 2254 0 902 8% $1206 $600 201% 9,705 0.5 VSD 31,166 7 0 2.8% $3,445 $20,000 15% $45,000 5.8

Outline Start with option and impact table Select your projects Prioritize projects Justify projects

Prioritize Projects - Key Ideas Essential Needs come first (e.g. failed equipment) Incorporate efficiency into planned projects (insulate with new roof) Strategic Ordering for cost savings Max/min your Criteria

Prioritize Projects: Strategic ordering reduces long term costs -Seize the window of opportunity Start w/ orientation and envelope for new construction Start with end-use requirements for existing buildings Reduce loads & improve equipment efficiencies before renewables

Prioritize Projects: Sample Options Strategically Ordered Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Natural Gas (therms) Building Energy (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) 1. T-Stat 2254 0 902 8% $1206 $600 201% 9,705 0.5 2. Lighting 274,500 150 0 5% $28,524 $107,000 24% $72,870 3.8 3. VSD 31,166 7 0 2.8% $3,445 $20,000 15% $45,000 5.8 4. Boiler 0 0 6,729 16% $7,572 $45,000 14% $12,287 5.9

Prioritize Projects: Sample Options Ordered to Maximize Cost Savings Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Natural Gas (therms) Building Energy (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) 1. Lighting 274,500 150 0 5% $28,524 $107,000 24% $72,870 3.8 2. Boiler 0 0 6,729 16% $7,572 $45,000 14% $12,287 5.9 3. VSD 31,166 7 0 2.8% $3,445 $20,000 15% $45,000 5.8 4. T-Stat 2254 0 902 8% $1206 $600 201% 9,705 0.5 Maximizing cost savings usually minimizes carbon footprint

Prioritize Projects: Sample Options Ordered by Impact (NPV) Annual Savings Measure Electricity (kwh) Electric Demand (kw) Natural Gas (therms) Building Energy (%) Cost Savings Installation Costs IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) 1. Lighting 274,500 150 0 5% $28,524 $107,000 24% $72,870 3.8 2. VSD 31,166 7 0 2.8% $3,445 $20,000 15% $45,000 5.8 3. Boiler 0 0 6,729 16% $7,572 $45,000 14% $12,287 5.9 4. T-Stat 2254 0 902 8% $1206 $600 201% 9,705 0.5

Outline Start with option and impact table Select your projects Prioritize projects Justify projects

Justify Projects - Key Ideas Meet Economic Criteria by Bundling projects Accounting for additional factors (e.g. maintenance) Marginal cost analysis Incorporate incentives Establish Funding Stream Cash on hand Cash accumulated over time Other people s cash Guaranteed savings with performance contracting

Justify Projects Bundle projects to achieve desired economics Quick Returns Medium Returns Long Returns Tune up Thermostats Occupancy Sensors Timers Variable Speed Drive Insulation Lighting Insulation Boiler Windows

Justify Projects: Some factors add additional weight to efficiency projects Reduced Maintenance Usable Floor Space (near windows) Worker/student comfort and productivity Aesthetics (better appearances) Functionality (working systems) Controllability (dimming lighting) Reduced global warming Reduced vulnerability to markets Public relations The table of impacts is just one piece of the decision.

Justify Projects: w/ Marginal Cost Analysis Energy Cost Reduction Measure (ECRM) Natural Gas Savings Annual Cost Savings Energy Cost Savings Cost IRR NPV SPB (therms/yr) ($/yr) (%) (yrs) Boiler Upgrade (High Efficiency 95%) 9,669 $8,957 22% ($5,722 in fuel, $3,235 in Maintenance) of NG heating costs Full First Cost Net Cost after Incentive Incremental Cost (above standard 80% system) Net Incremental Cost after Incentive $161,760 2.7% ($35,520) 18 $149,760 3.4% ($23,520) 17 $80,880 10% $45,360 9 $68,880 12% $57,360 8

Justify Projects: by Incorporating Incentives Annual Facility Savings Financial Analysis Energy Cost Reduction Measure Electric kwh Electric Demand kw Natural Gas Therms $ Cost % Estimated Cost IRR (%) NPV Simple Payback (yrs) ECRM1: Upgrade Gym Lighting from MH to T8 Fluorescent With $1,350 in Incentives 2,318 3 (17) $243 0.3% $1,800 6% $77 7.4 $450 12% $527 1.9

Justify Projects: Cash Flow Techniques Upgrade Financing Monthly Utility Costs Savings Save for Long Term investments Time Use your own money, or other people s money Allow savings to pay for financing Roll quick savings into long term investments Purchase energy savings performance contracts

Cash Flow Techniques $45,000 Roll quick savings into long term investments $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $- Yr Yr Yr Yr Yr 1 2 3 4 5 T-Stat Lighting VSD Boiler Accumulating Wealth

Key Ideas - Review 1. Identify Projects (for further consideration) a) Look at life cycle b) Set and screen for your criteria ( cash flow, MARR, planning horizon) c) Consider overriding criteria (comfort) 2. Prioritize Projects (order) a) Needs b) Strategic order c) Maximize impact over life cycle (typically NPV) 3. Justify a) Meet criteria by Bundling, Adding externalities, Marginal cost, with Incentives b) Identify a funding stream Cash on hand, Accumulated cash over time, Other people s cash, Allow savings to pay for financing, Get guaranteed svgs w/ ESPC

Presentations will be available at: presentations.sedac.org Web site: www.sedac.org Contact: info@sedac.org 1-800-214-7954