Broward County, Florida 100 -Year Flood Elevation Map and Associated Modeling. Bid No. R P1 September 27, 2017

Similar documents
Location: Tampa, Florida March 6, 2013

FEMA FLOOD MAPS Public Works Department Stormwater Management Division March 6, 2018

Non Regulatory Risk MAP Products Flood Depth and Probability Grids

Delaware River Basin Commission s Role in Flood Loss Reduction Efforts

Risk, Mitigation, & Planning

CITY OF PLANTATION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM NO

David A. Stroud, CFM AMEC Earth & Environmental Raleigh, NC

Flood Risk Resilience in Alabama: Challenges and Successes

Kentucky Risk MAP It s not Map Mod II

Thurston County, WA Flood Hazard Mitigation Plan Annual Progress Report CRS Activity 510

Canada s exposure to flood risk. Who is affected, where are they located, and what is at stake

Action Items for Flood Risk Management on Wildcat Creek Interagency success with floodplain management plans and flood forecast inundation maps

Volusia County Floodplain Management Plan 2012

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

The AIR Inland Flood Model for Great Britian

Technical Memorandum 3.4 E Avenue NW Watershed Drainage Study. Appendix E Floodplain Impacts and Implications Memo

Sea Level Rise and the NFIP

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program

Crediting Adaptation Strategies through the National Flood Insurance Program s Community Rating System Coordinator s Manual

Flood Smart Communities

Talk Components. Wharton Risk Center & Research Context TC Flood Research Approach Freshwater Flood Main Results

Martin County, Florida Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. March 22, 2018 Stuart, Florida

Planning for SLR Resiliency in Virginia Beach

Attachment B. King County Flood Control Zone District Work Program

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION MULTI-JURISDICTION HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN. Advisory Committee Meeting September 12, 2012

Skagit County Flood Insurance Study Update. Ryan Ike, CFM FEMA Region 10

FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Flood risk assessment for sustainable urban development : Case study of Marikina-Pasig-San Juan river basin, Manila

Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Community Rating System: A Comparative Analysis

THE $64,000 FLOOD INSURANCE BILL

Adapting Maine s coastal communities to sea level rise and storm surge (2015 State of the Bay Presentation)

ASFPM Partnerships for Statewide Mitigation Actions. Alicia Williams GIS and HMP Section Manager, Amec Foster Wheeler June 2016

Suwannee River Water Management District

SECTION V THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY BLUEPRINT

Piloting LAMP from Stream to Sea

NFIP Program Basics. KAMM Regional Training

Modernization, FEMA is Recognizing the connection between damage reduction and

Adaptation Practices and Lessons Learned

BUTTS COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

July 31, 2017 NFIP Flood Map Open House Flood Maps 101 Flood Mapping acronyms History of the NFIP Flood Mapping Updates Flood Insurance Fairhope,

Chemung HUC-8 Watershed Project. February 1, 2011

Flood Hazards and Flood Risk, the Impact of a Changing Climate

Flood Resilience Study Findings

Flood Risk Review (FRR) Meeting. Cumberland County, Pennsylvania Carlisle, Pennsylvania December 5, 2016

Coastal Flood Insurance Studies in Virginia and Climate Change

Use of FEMA Non regulatory Flood Risk Products in Planning

Workshop Summary: Adaptation to Sea Level Rise Best Practices Village of Key Biscayne. Presented by: AECOM May 26, 2017

National Coastal Outreach

CHAPTER THREE Natural Hazard Mitigation Strategy

Michael Taylor, PE, CFM Project Manager, AECOM August 25, 2015

Georgia Flood M.A.P. Program Risk MAP Plenary Session GAFM 2011

FLOOD STUDY Atlantic County, NJ. FEMA REGION II July 12, :00

ASFPM RECOMMENDED TASK FORCE ACTIONS

Using Non-Regulatory RiskMAP Products in Floodplain Management. Ferrin Affleck, PE, CFM, Water Resources Engineer Project Manager Atkins

Bucks County, PA Flood Risk Review Meeting. November 2014

Floodplain Management Plan

Flood Risk Assessment in the

New Tools for Mitigation & Outreach. Louie Greenwell Stantec

Oklahoma High Water Marks. CTP Community of Practice April 20, 2017

Cameron County, TX. Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) Meeting. Please sign in (sheet at front of the room) Meeting will begin at 9:00

SILVER JACKETS: TEAMING TO MITIGATE AND MANAGE STATE FLOOD HAZARD PRIORITIES

Impact of Climate Change and Population Growth on the National Flood Insurance Program. Mark Crowell 2/26/2014

FLOOD INSURANCE. Most mortgage lenders require flood insurance for

United States Government Accountability Office GAO. Report to Congressional Requesters. December 2010 FEMA FLOOD MAPS

King County Flood Control District 2015 Work Program

FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

RichSmith_slate-FEMA_320x240.wmv.

Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana Flood Insurance Study Update Risk Analysis March 3, Shona Gibson Project Monitor, FEMA Region VI

Delaware Bay / River Coastal Flood Risk Study. FEMA REGION II and III September 19, 2012

Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS) Program

Technical Appendix: Protecting Open Space & Ourselves: Reducing Flood Risk in the Gulf of Mexico Through Strategic Land Conservation

Erie County Flood Risk Review Meeting. January 18, 2018

Southwest Florida Discovery Kick-Off Meeting. February 4, 2014

Accounting for Long-Term Erosion and Sea Level Rise in New England: A TMAC Recommendation

National Capitol Region HAZUS User Group Call

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION ABOUT FLOODPLAINS Michigan Department of Environmental Quality

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK MANAGEMENT UTILIZING HYDRAULIC MODELING AND GIS TECHNOLOGIES IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT

Findings/Debrief Meeting September 9, CDOT R4 Headquarters Big Thompson Conference Room W 10 th St. Greeley, CO 80634

2. We continue to work on the year end close in preparation of the audits commencement.

N.C. Floodplain Mapping Program

Mapping flood risk its role in improving flood resilience in England

Leveraging HAZUS for Risk Assessment Analysis within Risk MAP

Development of an Integrated Simulation Model for Flood Risk Evaluation and Damage Assessment

FEMA s Flood Map Modernization Preparing for FY09 and Beyond: Integrated Flood Data Update, Risk Assessment, and Mitigation Planning

Coastal Flood Maps. Chris Penney. Program Manager USACE Baltimore District 2 June US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Discovery Report. Cache River Watershed, Alexander, Johnson, Pulaski, and Union Counties, Illinois

CRISP COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

Public Outreach Strategy

Aquidneck Island Resilience Strategy Issue Paper 4. Issue: RESIDENTIAL FLOODING

Mapping Flood Risk in the Upper Fox River Basin:

The AIR Inland Flood Model for the United States

Flood Risk Products. New Techniques for Identifying and Communicating Flood Risk

Chapter 7 Appendix B: National Flood Insurance Program Summary for Kaua'i County, 2015 Update

Integrating Hazus into the Flood Risk Assessment

G318 Local Mitigation Planning Workshop. Module 2: Risk Assessment. Visual 2.0

Wildfire and Flood Hazards, Using GIS Tools to Assess Risk

MAKING THE MOST OF LOCAL FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLANNING IN MELBOURNE S MUNICIPALITIES AND THE PORT PHILLIP AND WESTERNPORT REGION

Community Rating System. National Flood Insurance Program

IRWM Plan Update Quarter 4 Status Report, 2013 Monterey Peninsula, Carmel Bay, and South Monterey Bay Grant Agreement No.

GIS - Introduction and Sample Uses

Transcription:

Broward County, Florida 100 -Year Flood Elevation Map and Associated Modeling Bid No. R2114367P1 September 27, 2017

Meet the AECOM Team 2

Key Team Roles and Responsibilities Key Benefit: AECOM has assembled a proven technical team capable of adding value with innovations. Pradeep Nagarajan, PE Project Manager Maria Loinaz, PhD, PE Modeling Technical Lead Pamela Adams Stakeholder Coordination Lead Davicka Thompson Public Education & Information Lead 3 Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, PhD, PE, BCEE, DWRE/PMP Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Technical Lead

Team Qualifications Developers of current MIKE SHE / MIKE 11 model for the 100-year Flood Elevation Map Knowledge of all major drainage basins in the County Prepared 100-year Flood Elevation Maps for: - Palm Beach County, FL - Brevard County, FL - St. Lucie County, FL - Indian River County, FL - Clay County, FL Key Benefit: Tools and team to perform this work. 4

AECOM Relevant Projects 5

Benefits Relevant Projects Bring Kissimmee Basin Modeling and Operations Study South Florida Water Management District Benefit: Continuity Team that developed the KBMOS model also worked on the Broward County s MIKE SHE / MIKE 11 model, will also work on the 100-year Flood Model Original tools and routines Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map and Flood Insurance Study Report, FEMA Region IV Broward County, FL Benefit: Knowledge Transfer Team has all internal tools used to develop County Digital Flood Insurance Rate Maps Team understands sensitivities of the model and how they react to events Key Benefit: Ability to integrate and deliver modeling, improve CRS rating and stakeholder involvement. 6

Relevant Projects Community Rating System National Flood Insurance Program / Community Rating System / Local Mitigation Strategy Assistance Sarasota County, FL Benefit: Reduced Flood Insurance Rates National Flood Insurance Program and the Community Rating System Program Development of Community Involvement Plan Stormwater Regulations Qualified for Flood Mitigation Funds Sarasota County Watershed Model Maintenance and GIS Update Lemon Bay Model Sarasota County, FL Benefit: Proven Approach National Flood Insurance Program and the Community Rating System Program Floodplain Management Plan Model calibration utilizing data from major storm events Hydrologic and Hydraulic modeling 7

Project Understanding and Approach 8

Project Understanding The Main Objective Update Broward County 100-year Flood Elevation Map through: Refinement of the latest Countywide integrated MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 H&H Model that includes: - Future climatic conditions - Sea Level Rise The Team Brings Consistency performed in 2014 model update and precursor models(nada, SADA, CADA) Thorough understanding of the MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 model (complexities; constraints; and performance) Knowledge and lessons learned during the previous updates Key Benefit: Each update is unique and adaptive. 9

Overall Innovative Project Approach Development / Update of Existing Conditions FEMA MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 Model Public Engagement and Stakeholder Involvement Key Benefit: Proactive, collaborative stakeholder approach to identify and address concerns. Existing Conditions Model Calibration \ Validation \ and Simulation Development / Update of Future Conditions FEMA MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 Model Development of Future Conditions 100-Year Floodplain Delineation 10

Public Engagement Approach Purpose - Introduce project and highlight benefits - Communicate early and often - Listen to stakeholders - Address outstanding concerns County Benefits - Feedback from stakeholders early in the development process - Public education - Community support of the project Stakeholder workshop for Kissimmee Basin project Key Benefit: Inform and garner stakeholder support. 11

Public Engagement and Key Stakeholders Educate and inform stakeholders on the importance of developing and delivering solutions to efficiently address flooding concerns; and work collectively to improve the Community Rating System. Key Stakeholders Residents Civic and Business Organizations Government Partners Academia/Schools Healthcare Systems Environmental Advocates Utilities and Regulators (e.g., SFWMD, FPL) Elected Officials 12

Engagement Tools and Activities Stakeholder meetings Traditional media outreach Social media Interactive webpage Short educational video Mobile applications Brochures / newsletters / infographics Utility bill inserts Planning model simulations Key Benefit: Utilize as many platforms as are available and appropriate to convey messages efficiently. 13

Project Approach Data Collection Activities Development / Update of Existing FEMA MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 Model Data Collection and Review Topo, Land Use and H&H Info/Reports Field Reconnaissance Confirm the existence or non-existence of data Survey and Mapping (WSM) Sub-Consultant: Whidden 14

Project Approach Update of Existing Conditions Model Update of MIKE SHE Model Development of Rainfall Events for Existing Conditions Existing conditions: for calibration and validation - Review historical rainfall records (Past 10 years) - Identify storms with maximum intensity over 3-day period, possibly Hurricane IRMA - Evaluate rainfall patterns - Convert to the precipitation rate file in MIKE SHE format 15

Project Approach Update of Existing Conditions Model Update Model Software Version to 2017 - Check against old results - Possibly re-conceptualize representation of rainfallrunoff processes based on new options in the code. Update Time Varying Data to Simulation Period (based on the Selected Calibrated Event) - Rainfall - Reference evapotranspiration - Measured stages and flow (calibration and boundary conditions) - Structure operations Update Input Data with the Latest Available Information - Topography with Latest LiDAR - Survey Information: canal cross-sections and structures - Land use (if applicable) 16

Project Approach Existing Conditions Model Calibration/Validation Quality Checks Sub-basin Stage Storage: LiDAR versus model topography input file Remove numerical instabilities Mass balance conservation in surface water - groundwater exchanges Modify Parameters for Calibration Horizontal and vertical hydraulic conductivity (Kh and Kv) Surface water groundwater exchange features (flood codes, leakage coefficients) Surface and sub-surface runoff parameters (drainage, paved- areas) Manning s n (overland flow and MIKE 11 cross sections) 17

Project Approach Future Conditions Model Development Model Development for Future Conditions (2060 and 2100) Updated and approved 10-yr, 25-yr, 50-yr, 100-yr and 500-yr design storm events for Future Conditions (2060 and 2100) - Inclusion of sea level rise from Compact 2015 - Climate change adaptation Key challenges: - Tidal and groundwater boundary Inclusion of sea level rise - Non-Stationarity of IDF Curves Future Climate Conditions Key Benefit: County gains future conditions model with climate change and sea level rise factors. 18

Addressing Key Challenges Inclusion of SLR Tidal Boundaries - SFWMD future tidal conditions development - Zone A Coastal modeling Antecedent (Initial) Conditions and Groundwater Boundaries - USGS MODFLOW models 19

Addressing Key Challenges Future Climate Conditions Acknowledging Non-Stationarity Current IDF curves assumes stationarity and statistics are constant (independent of time) Increasing/decreasing trends already observed due to lower frequency climate variability (e.g., El Nino Southern Oscillation or Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation) Stationary assumptions potentially result in lower IDF curves (USACE 2016) 20

AECOM Toolbox to streamline analysis and development AECOM Forecasting Local Extremes (FLEx) Tool Stre amline Download and Analysis of His torical Station Data Fle xible Large Downscaled GCM Datasets Compute Compute Range of Pre cipitation Statis tics e.g., 95 th perc. 5 day max Anytime Epoch Diffe re nt Statis tical Te ch. Generate IDF Curves Any GCMs Time Horizon Different RCP Scenarios Key Benefit: Automated postprocessing tool to develop future IDF curves and visualize spatial variation in precipitation. GIS Toolbox Post-process and Vis ualize SpacialVariation in Pre cipitation Analyze Changes in SpacialVariation ove rtime 21

Unique Data Processing Tools 22

100-Year Flood Elevation Map and Associated Modeling Home Set Up IDF, His torical data IDF, Unde r climate change Reports & Output Home Unique Data Proce s s ing Tools Future IDF (FLEx) 23 Rainfall Conve rs ion Terrain Processing Groundwater Conversion Wis e -Floodplain Automate the processing of rainfall data for any design event to different rainfall patterns to be utilized in MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 model Automatically merge the changes with recent aerial photography, land cover GIS feature classes, as-built and data from survey to create a single topography file from the existing LiDAR data This specific utility is to easily convert the updated MODFLOW output files to MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 input files to allow for future updates based on changes to the groundwater model or sea level rise projections. The merging tool is to integrate the results from the updated MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 model and Coastal Zone A Model by comparing the elevation results within a single grid, optimize the results and finally develop a single grid file that will eventually be used to develop the 100-year Flood Elevation Map

Community Rating System (CRS) 24

Broward s Community Rating System Score = 7 Goals Reduce flood damages to insurable property Strengthen and support the insurance aspects of the NFIP Encourage a comprehensive approach to floodplain management Activities Public Information Activities (Under 300) Elevation certificates Map information service Outreach projects Hazard disclosure Mapping and Regulation Activities (Under 400) Flood hazard mapping Higher regulatory standards Flood data maintenance Stormwater management Elements Prepare and deliver presentations Hazard Disclosure Category Flood Hazard Mapping Higher Regulatory Standards Flood Data Maintenance and Stormwater Management Activity 25

When the County partners with Our Team, you will: Access to modeling resources Proven QA/QC program - ISO 9001 certification for more than 10 years Improve your Community Rating System Major benefit: - Future Planning - Infrastructure Investments - Development Requirements 26