CHAPTER - 5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIVIDEND POLICY

CHAPTER - 5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIVIDEND POLICY 67

CONTENT 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Analysis of selected Companies 5.2.1 Dabur India Ltd. 5.2.2 Nestle India Ltd. 5.2.3 Britannia Industries Ltd. 5.2.4 NTPC Ltd. 5.2.5 PowerGrid Ltd. 5.2.6 Tata Power 5.2.7 Cipla GlobalLtd. 5.2.8 Dr.ReddyLtd. 5.2.9 SunPharma Ltd. 5.2.10 Infosys 5.2.11 TCS Ltd. 5.2.12 Wipro Ltd. 5.2.13 HDFC Bank Ltd. 5.2.14 SBI 5.2.15 Axis Bank 5.2.16 Eicher Motors Ltd. 5.2.17 TVS Ltd. 5.2.18 Heromotocorp Ltd 5.2.19 JSW Steel Ltd. 5.2.20 Tata Steel Ltd. 5.2.21 Bhushan Steel 5.2.22 ACC Ltd. 5.2.23 Ambuja Cement Ltd. 5.2.24 J.K.Cement Ltd. 5.2.25 IDFC 5.2.26 Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Ltd. 5.2.27 J.M.Financial Ltd. 5.2.28 DLF Ltd. 5.2.29 NBCC Ltd. 5.2.30 JMC Projects Ltd. 5.3 Summary Details 68

5.1 INTRODUCTION A number of researchers have advanced theories and provided empirical evidence regarding determinants of a firm s dividend policy. The dividend policy issue, however, is yet unresolved. There are many factors that could affect a firm s dividend payout behaviour. According to partington,1987 36 these reasons include profitability, stability of dividend payout and retained earnings, liquidity and cash flows, investment variables and financial variables. According to Lintner,1956,Rozeff 1992,and Barclay 1995,investment opportunities, agency costs, financial leverage, last year s dividend and firm size influence the dividend policy of a company.megginson,1957 37 states that there are worldwide industrial patterns in the dividend policy and important factors affecting the dividend payouts are regulations, industry growth rate, capital investment needs, profitability, earnings variability and asset characteristics such as the composition of tangible and intangible assets. Moreover research in the past also shows that there are significant influence of growth rate of firm, systematic risk, retained earnings, liquidity, cash availability, provision for tax and firm size on dividend payout. In this chapter, issues related to dividend policies have been analysed within many framework including profitability, growth rate, liquidity, leverage and provision for taxation etc. The major focus of the research, however is to find out whether there is dividend policy of all companies,to know the relationship between the variables and with dividend payout and the technique of correlation matrix analysis is used for the purpose, the scope, methodology used and interpretation of the result of correlation matrix are presented after discussion and an analysis of the impact of least related variable on the dividend policy of a firm, that has either been made by merely observing the data of the selected companies or hereby to go further analysis to know the extent of impact of least correlated variable on dividend payout simple regression analysis has been run. Based on application of correlation matrix least correlated variable has been 36 37 Partington, G. H. (1987). Variables influencing dividend policy in Australia:Survey Results. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 16, p.165-182. Megginson, W. (1997). In Corporate Finance Theory,Reading,Addison-Wesley ( p.355). 69

found. Least correlated variable refers low value (correlation coefficient). The study is based on five years data of thirty selected companies of ten industries. The period concerned is from 2007-2012. For the purpose of simple regression analysis, dividend payout rate, which is defined as the ratio of dividends per share for the firms dividend policy is as under: Dividend Payout Ratio: It measures the relationship between dividends and earnings.i.g. What percentage shares of dividend is to be distributed from profit. It is to be calculated, D/P Ratio = Dividend Per Share *100 Earnings per Share The factors or explanatory variables are considered for the study purpose are as under: 1) Liquidity: Although dividend is related to earnings, the actual payment of dividend is made from available cash. Thus, liquidity always plays an important role in any cash payment by a firm. This usually happens in case of high growth firms or firm which requires more funds for expansion purposes, which have very low liquidity because of substantial investment like profitability, liquidity etc. Also has positive relationship with dividend. Hence, greater the cash position and overall liquidity of a company, greater is the ability to pay dividend. The Current-Ratio is one of the best-known measures of financial strength and liquidity. It is calculated as shown below: Current-Ratio = Total Current-Assets Total Current-Liabilities 2) Size and Growth: Jahera, Lioud and Modani (1986) 38 find that size is the major factor that determines a company s policy. Big companies are usually in mature industries with higher credit levels. Therefore, due to the fact that the cost of dividend policy is relatively large companies have a stable dividend policy and moreover have a higher payout than small companies. In order to study the influence of size on dividend. Various measures such as Total Assets, Paid-up Capital, and Net worth etc. have been 38 Jahera, J. L. (1986). Growth,Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of Dividend. Akron Business and Economic Review 17, p.55-69. 70

used by researchers to represent size. James Bales said that many arguments may be advanced against the use of any of the above measures for size. So, no measures are perfect. Moreover, since all the above mentioned measures are correlated to each other any measures may be used. Larger firms should be able to pay higher dividends. Therefore expect to see the positive relationship between size and dividend payment. Higher Growth companies have lots of investment opportunities and are likely to pay low dividends because they have profitable uses for the capital. Therefore, high growth companies prefer to capitalize on their favourable investment prospects and have clear disincentive s in paying operating cash flows and profits as dividends.(gaver and Gavert,1993) 39 this ratio indicates the rate of growth of the total assets in the business and is expressed in percentage. 3) Leverage: A firm with large amounts of debts will follow a more conservative dividend policy. The reason is that if a firm has relatively high financial leverage, its dependence on external finance is increased. Therefore, such firms pay low dividends to avoid borrowing i.e. a firm with higher leverage will pay a lower fraction of earnings in order to lower its dependence on external financing leverage can be calculated by Debt/Equity Ratio. The Debt/Equity or Leverage Ratio indicates the extent to which the business is reliant on debt financing. Debt/Equity Ratio =Long-term funds/shareholder s fund 4) Provision for Taxation: In India, dividends were taxed in the hands of investors. Since investor did not give significance to tax matter individual tax rates were irrelevant while determining dividend policy in the Indian context. However, shareholders in the high tax bracket may have preferred dividend income rather than capital gains. This is because, though dividend income for the individual was free, capital gains are taxable in India. Under the Finance Act 1997 40, no tax was payable on dividends by a company and consequently there was no withholding tax on dividends paid by a company to its shareholders. However, a company declaring a dividend was required to pay incometax at the rate of 10% on the amount of dividend distributed. If, tax on dividends is 39 40 Gaver, J. a. (1993). Additional Evidence on the Association between Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing,Dividend and Compensation plocies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, p.185-209 T.N.Pandey,Budget 1997:New Tax Concept Relating to Dividend Income, Chartered Secretary, April 1997,p.365-366 71

viewed from point of view of the corporate sector, they have to pay dividend tax and changes individual tax rates may influence the company s dividend policy. For Example, a cut in dividend tax from 20% to 10% on the dividend declared by companies had been viewed as positive. This variable shows that how much amount from profit is kept for payment of tax. This is a provision from profit formula used for calculation of provision taxation is, = Amount provided for tax Net Profit 5.2 ANALYSIS OF SELECTED COMPANIES Hypothesis No-1 H 0 = There is no significant influence of least related variable on dividend payout of selected companies. H 1 = There is significant influence of least related variable on dividend payout of selected companies. Values for different variables are calculated for different companies which are as follows: 5.2.1 DABUR INDIA LTD. YEAR LEVERAGE LIQUIDITY PROVISION DIVIDEND SIZE & GROWTH (DEBT- (CURRENT FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL ASSETS) EQUITY RATIO) TAXATION RATIO) 2007-08 38.46 0.948818 31.19367 0.032815 13.25648 2008-09 41.96 1.121894 57.04753 0.191405 12.10353 2009-10 40.24-1.06165 60.6 0.146824 17.77887 2010-11 49.24 1.512513 177.2301 0.347733 20.93885 2011-12 52.04 1.513449 17.97409 0.352974 21.08751 (Table 5.1: Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of DABUR INDIA LTD.) 72

In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1.589.282.961 **.815 DPY Sig. (2-tailed).296.645.009.093.589 1.173.485.118 LQ Sig. (2-tailed).296.781.408.850.282.173 1.435.387 SG Sig. (2-tailed).645.781.464.520.961 **.485.435 1.794 LV Sig. (2-tailed).009.408.464.108.815.118.387.794 1 PT Sig. (2-tailed).093.850.520.108 **. is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). POSITIVE CORRELATION: The correlation Matrix shows that dividend payout ratio is significantly and strong positively correlated with leverage. It is also nearer to strong positively correlated with provision for taxation. It is partially correlated with liquidity. It also shows weak correlation with growth. Liquidity is weakly correlated with growth, leverage and provision for taxation. Growth is also weakly correlated with leverage and provision for taxation. Leverage is weakly correlated with liquidity and growth. Leverage is also nearer to strong positively correlated with provision for taxation. Considering above correlation matrix, least correlated value is 0.282 which indicates that there is low correlation between dividend payout and growth. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of growth on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. 73

YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT SIZE & GROWTH(TOTAL ASSETS) 2007-08 38.46 31.19 2008-09 41.96 57.05 2009-10 40.24 60.6 2010-11 49.24 177.23 2011-12 52.04 17.97 TABLE 5.1.1: SIMPLE RERESSION ANALYSIS FOR DABUR INDIA LTD. Output of Simple Regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.282 a.080 -.227 6.56110 a. Predictors: (Constant),SG The above table indicates that the value of R for Dabur India Ltd. 28.2% that refers there is a weak linear correlation between explanatory variables such as growth and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. The R2 value (the "R Square" column) indicates how much of the total change in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variable. Value of adjusted R- Square for Dabur India Ltd. is -0.227. It indicates that there is no change in dividend payout due to the changes in growth. ANOVA a Sum of Model Df Mean Square F Sig. Squares Regression 11.193 1 11.193.260.645 b 1 Residual 129.144 3 43.048 Total 140.337 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), SG 74

The F-ratio in the ANOVA table tests whether the overall regression model is a good fit for the data. The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 0.260, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of size and growth on the dividend payout for Dabur Company. Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Model T Sig. Std. Lower Upper B Beta Error Bound Bound (Constant) 42.566 4.624 9.206.003 27.851 57.281 1 GR.026.052.282.510.645 -.139.192 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from growth can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 42.566 + (0.026*growth) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for growth is equal to 026Which means for every additional increase in growth, dividend payout increases by 0.026. 75

5.2.2 NESTLE INDIA LTD. YEAR LEVERAGE LIQUIDITY PROVISION DIVIDEND SIZE & GROWTH (DEBT- (CURRENT FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL ASSETS) EQUITY RATIO) TAXATION RATIO) 2007-08 41.52 0.673967 13.56818 0.001727 30.89238 2008-09 71.39 0.602199 20.00081 #VALUE! 28.56924 2009-10 57.12 0.626476 44.91131 #VALUE! 28.50777 2010-11 48.63 1.143477 61.16 1.3033 30.72267 2011-12 43.79 1.0154 17.31337 1.243925 31.2186 (Table 5.2: Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of NESTLE INDIA LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1 -.525.050 -.469 -.885 * Sig. (2-tailed).364.936.426.046 -.525 1.453.983 **.710 Sig. (2-tailed).364.444.003.180.050.453 1.368 -.140 Sig. (2-tailed).936.444.542.822 -.469.983 **.368 1.675 Sig. (2-tailed).426.003.542.211 -.885 *.710 -.140.675 1 Sig. (2-tailed).046.180.822.211 *. is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 76

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows weak positive correlation with Growth ratio. Liquidity and leverage are significant and strongly positively correlated. Liquidity is also partial positive correlated with growth and provision for taxation. Growth and leverage are also partially correlated. Leverage is also partially correlated with provision for taxation. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows negative correlation with liquidity, leverage and provision for taxation. Growth and provision for taxation are negatively correlated. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.885 that indicates low correlation between dividend payout and provision for taxation. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of provision for taxation on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT PROVISION FOR TAXATION 2007-08 41.52 30.89 2008-09 71.39 28.57 2009-10 57.12 28.51 2010-11 48.63 30.72 2011-12 43.79 31.22 TABLE 5.2.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR NESTLE INDIA Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.885 a.782.710 6.53942 a. Predictors: (Constant), PT The above table indicates that the value of R for NESTLE INDIA LTD.88.5% that refers there is a Positive linear correlation between explanatory variables such as provision for taxation and the dependent variable i.e. dividend payout of the company. 77

Value of adjusted R- Square for Nestle India Ltd. is 0.710. It indicates that there is 71% change in dividend payout due to the changes in Provision for taxation. ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 461.285 1 461.285 10.787.046 b 1 Residual 128.292 3 42.764 Total 589.577 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), PT The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 10.787, p <0.05 (i.e., the regression model is fit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is significant impact of provision for taxation on the dividend payout of the NESTLE INDIA LTD. Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Model T Sig. Std. Lower Upper B Beta Error Bound Bound 1 (Constant) 294.570 73.766 3.993.028 59.815 529.326 TX -8.074 2.458 -.885-3.284.046-15.898 -.250 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from provision for taxation can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 294.570 - (8.074*prov.for taxation) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. 78

In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for provision for taxation is equal to-8.074. This means that for every additional in increase provision for taxation, dividend payout decreases by 8.074. YEAR 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 5.2.3 BRITANNIAINDUSTRIES LTD. LIQUIDITY SIZE & LEVERAGE(DEB PROVISION DIVIDEND (CURRENT GROWTH(TOTA T-EQUITY FOR PAYOUT RATIO) L ASSETS) RATIO) TAXATION 22.51 1.589052 41.1866 0.140376 17.7632 52.97 1.304996-0.67749 0.030517 22.41447 51.26 1.073139-0.85606 1.0842 3.532209 53.44 0.647407 79.50668 1.275161 26.64344 54.37 1.141355 12.80616 0.332744 26.00547 (Table no.5.3: Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: 79

DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1 -.713 -.212.395.165 Sig. (2-tailed).177.732.511.791 -.713 1 -.469 -.847 -.209 Sig. (2-tailed).177.425.070.736 -.212 -.469 1.448.478 Sig. (2-tailed).732.425.450.415.395 -.847.448 1 -.257 Sig. (2-tailed).511.070.450.677.165 -.209.478 -.257 1 Sig. (2-tailed).791.736.415.677 POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows partial positive correlation with leverage and provision for taxation. Liquidity is partially correlated with leverage and provision for taxation. Leverage and growth are also partially correlated. Provision for taxation and growth are also partially correlated. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows negative correlation with liquidity and growth. Liquidity is negatively correlated with growth, leverage and provision for taxation. Growth and leverage are also negatively correlated. 80

Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.713 that indicates low correlation between dividend payout and liquidity. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Liquidity on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LIQUIDITY(CURRENT RATIO) 2007-08 22.51 1.59 2008-09 52.97 1.30 2009-10 51.26 1.07 2010-11 53.44 0.65 2011-12 54.37 1.14 TABLE 5.3.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR BRITANNIA LTD. Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.713 a.508.344 11.08297 a. Predictors: (Constant), LQ The above table indicates that the value of R for BRITANNIA LTD. is 71.3% that refers there is a Positive linear correlation between explanatory variables such as liquidity and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for BRITANNIALTD. is 0.344. It indicates that there is 34.4% change in dividend payout due to the changes in liquidity. ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 380.802 1 380.802 3.100.177 b 1 Residual 368.497 3 122.832 Total 749.299 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LQ 81

The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 3.100, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of liquidity on the dividend payout of the BRITANNIA LTD. Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Model T Sig. Std. Lower Upper B Beta Error Bound Bound 1 (Constant) 79.492 19.157 4.149.025 18.525 140.459 LQ -28.303 16.075 -.713-1.761.177-79.460 22.854 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from liquidity can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 79.492 - (28.303*liquidity) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for liquidity is equal to - 28.303. This means that for every additional increase in liquidity, dividend payout decreases by 28.303. 82

5.2.4 NTPC LTD YEAR SIZE & LIQUIDITY LEVERAGE(DEB PROVISION DIVIDEND GROWTH (CURRENT T-EQUITY FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL RATIO) RATIO) TAXATION ASSETS) 2007-08 46 3.221831 10.47 0.516558 27.69505 2008-09 42 2.893298 16.055 0.602541 6.745018 2009-10 42 2.864418 8.017458 0.605362 24.65849 2010-11 42 2.572039 23.13398 0.632637 24.45643 2011-12 41 2.257266 12.00821 0.666903 25.16632 (Table no: 5.4 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of NTPC LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1.826 -.259 -.955 *.308 Sig. (2-tailed).085.674.011.614.826 1 -.313 -.954 * -.095 Sig. (2-tailed).085.608.012.879 -.259 -.313 1.329 -.256 Sig. (2-tailed).674.608.588.678 -.955 * -.954 *.329 1 -.107 Sig. (2-tailed).011.012.588.865.308 -.095 -.256 -.107 1 Sig. (2-tailed).614.879.678.865 *. is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). 83

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows strong positive correlation with liquidity. And it shows partial correlation with provision for taxation. Growth and leverage are partially correlated. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows negative correlation with growth and leverage. Liquidity is negatively correlated with growth, leverage and provision for taxation. Growth is negatively correlated with liquidity and provision for taxation. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.955 that indicates low correlation between dividend pay-out and leverage. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Liquidity on dividend pay-out which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LIQUIDITY(CURRENT RATIO) 2007-08 46 3.22 2008-09 42 2.89 2009-10 42 2.86 2010-11 42 2.57 2011-12 41 2.26 TABLE 5.4.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR NTPC LTD. Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.955 a.912.883.66650 a. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table indicates that the value of R for NTPC LTD. is 95.5% that refers there is a positive linear correlation between explanatory variables such as leverage and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend pay-out of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for NTPC is 0.883. It indicates that there is 88.3% change in dividend payout due to the changes in leverage. 84

ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 13.867 1 13.867 31.218.011 b 1 Residual 1.333 3.444 Total 15.200 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 31.218, p <0.05 (i.e., the regression model is fit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is significant impact of leverage on the dividend payout of the NTPC LTD. Unstandardized Standardized Model T Sig. Std. B Beta Error 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Upper Bound Bound (Constant) 62.806 3.629 17.308.000 51.258 74.354 1 LV -33.410 5.980 -.955-5.587.011-52.439-14.380 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend pay-out from leverage can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend pay-out = 62.806 - (33.410*leverage) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for leverage is equal to - 33.410. This means that for every additional increase in leverage, dividend payout decreases by 33.410. 85

5.2.5 POWER GRID LTD YEAR SIZE & LIQUIDITY LEVERAGE PROVISION DIVIDEND GROWTH (CURRENT (DEBT-EQUITY FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL RATIO) RATIO) TAXATION ASSETS) 2007-08 33.16 1.07005 19.73614 1.648134 12.01618 2008-09 33.16 1 20.4088 1.946458 24.13638 2009-10 30.93 0.953829 16.22362 2.158888 22.27723 2010-11 30.04 0.915628 41.61321 2.053105 29.4902 2011-12 30.01 0.623215 21.78231 2.356522 29.20835 (Table no: 5.5 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of POWERGRID LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1.739 -.482 -.814 -.762 Sig. (2-tailed).154.411.094.134.739 1 -.088 -.867 -.704 Sig. (2-tailed).154.888.057.185 -.482 -.088 1.057.520 Sig. (2-tailed).411.888.927.369 -.814 -.867.057 1.826 Sig. (2-tailed).094.057.927.085 -.762 -.704.520.826 1 Sig. (2-tailed).134.185.369.085 86

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows partial positive correlation with liquidity. Growth is partially correlated with leverage and provision for taxation. Leverage and provision for taxation are significant and strong positively correlated. And it is partially correlated with growth. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows negative correlation with growth, leverage and provision for taxation. Liquidity is negatively correlated with growth, leverage and provision for taxation. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.814 that indicates low correlation between dividend pay-out and leverage. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Leverage on dividend pay-out which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LEVERAGE(DEBT-EQUITY RATIO) 2007-08 33.16 1.65 2008-09 33.16 1.95 2009-10 30.93 2.16 2010-11 30.04 2.05 2011-12 30.01 2.36 TABLE 5.5.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR POWERGRID LTD. Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.814 a.663.550 1.06994 a. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table indicates that the value of R for POWER GRID ltd. 81.4% that refers there is a positive linear correlation between explanatory variables such as leverage and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of 87

adjusted R- Square for POWER GRID LTD. is 0.550. It indicates that there is 55% change in dividend payout due to the changes in leverage. ANOVA a 1 Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 6.746 1 6.746 5.892.094 b Residual 3.434 3 1.145 Total 10.180 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 5.892, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of leverage on the dividend payout of the POWER GRID LTD. 1 (Constant) 41.499 4.163 9.968.002 28.250 54.748 LV -4.939 2.035 -.814-2.427.094-11.414 1.536 Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from growth can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend pay-out with an Model = 41.499 - (4.939*leverage) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for leverage is equal to4.939. This means that for every additional in increase leverage, dividend payout decreases by 4.939. Unstandardized B Std. Error Standardized Beta T Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Bound Upper Bound 88

5.2.6 TATA POWER YEAR LIQUIDITY SIZE & LEVERAGE(DEB PROVISION DIVIDEND (CURRENT GROWTH(TO T-EQUITY FOR PAYOUT RATIO) TAL ASSETS) RATIO) TAXATION 2007-08 27.17 2.107667 0.407174 15.33292 10.30928 2008-09 26.32 2.260261 0.640981 25.54908 17.45748 2009-10 30.39 2.74631 0.587298 19.27169 25.417 2010-11 31.55 2.177834 0.696231 10.41667 15.3777 2011-12 27.59 1.323855 0.730604 36.18521 30.48128 (Table no: 5.6 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of TATA POWER) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1.390.273 -.580.071 Sig. (2-tailed).516.657.306.910.390 1 -.378 -.640 -.330 Sig. (2-tailed).516.530.244.588.273 -.378 1.443.641 Sig. (2-tailed).657.530.455.243 -.580 -.640.443 1.753 Sig. (2-tailed).306.244.455.142.071 -.330.641.753 1 Sig. (2-tailed).910.588.243.142 89

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows partial positive correlation with liquidity and growth. It shows weak correlation with provision for taxation. Growth is partial positive correlated with liquidity and provision for taxation. Leverage is partially correlated with growth and provision for taxation. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows negative correlation with growth and leverage. Liquidity ratio is negatively correlated with growth, leverage and provision for taxation. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.580 that indicates low correlation between dividend pay-out and leverage. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Leverage on dividend pay-out which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LEVERAGE(DEBT-EQUITY RATIO) 2007-08 27.17 15.33 2008-09 26.32 25.55 2009-10 30.39 19.27 2010-11 31.55 10.42 2011-12 27.59 36.19 TABLE 5.6.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR TATA POWER Output of simple regression: Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.580 a.336.115 2.11277 a. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table indicates that the value of R for TATA POWER is 58% that refers there is a partial linear correlation between explanatory variables such as leverage and the dependent variable i.e. dividend pay-out of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for TATA POWER is 0.115. It indicates that there is 11.5% change in dividend pay-out due to the changes in leverage. 90

ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 6.779 1 6.779 1.519.306 b 1 Residual 13.391 3 4.464 Total 20.170 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 1.519, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of leverage on the dividend pay-out of the TATA POWER. Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Model T Sig. Std. Lower Upper B Beta Error Bound Bound (Constant) 31.391 2.451 12.806.001 23.590 39.192 1 LV -.131.106 -.580-1.232.306 -.468.207 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend pay-out from leverage can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend pay-out = 31.191 - (0.131*leverage) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for leverage is equal to 0.131. This means that for every additional increase leverage, dividend pay-out decreases by 0.131. 91

5.2.7 CIPLAGLOBAL LTD. YEAR LEVERAGE LIQUIDITY PROVISION DIVIDEND SIZE & GROWTH (DEBT- (CURRENT FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL ASSETS) EQUITY RATIO) TAXATION RATIO) 2007-08 22.18 3 29.20507 0.154568 16.34845 2008-09 20.00 3.491736 21.60053 0.216055 13.76249 2009-10 14.85 3.584843 11.78735 0.000857 18.41509 2010-11 16.67 2.841776 38.53723 0.03569 16.59427 2011-12 14.23 4.067797 6.463068 0.034964 20.90077 (Table no: 5.7 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables CIPLA GLOBAL LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1 -.576.550.859 -.758 Sig. (2-tailed).309.337.063.138 -.576 1 -.963 ** -.206.589 Sig. (2-tailed).309.009.740.296.550 -.963 ** 1.268 -.617 Sig. (2-tailed).337.009.663.267.859 -.206.268 1 -.786 Sig. (2-tailed).063.740.663.115 -.758.589 -.617 -.786 1 Sig. (2-tailed).138.296.267.115 **. is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 92

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows strong positive correlation with leverage. It shows partial positive correlation with growth. Liquidity and provision for taxation are partially correlated. Growth and leverage are partially correlated with leverage. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend pay-out shows negative correlations with liquidity and provision for taxation. Liquidity is negatively correlated with growth and leverage. Growth and provision for taxation are negatively correlated. Leverage and provisions for taxation are also negatively correlated. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.758 that indicates low correlation between dividend pay-out and provision for taxation. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Provision for Taxation on dividend pay-out which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT PROVISION FOR TAXATION 2007-08 22.18 16.35 2008-09 20.00 13.76 2009-10 14.85 18.42 2010-11 16.67 16.59 2011-12 14.23 20.90 TABLE 5.7.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR CIPLA LTD. Output of Simple Regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.758 a.575.433 2.56805 a. Predictors: (Constant), PT The above table indicates that the value of R for CIPLA LTD. is 75.8% that refers there is a Positive linear correlation between explanatory variables such as provision for taxation and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for CIPLA LTD. is 0.433. It indicates that there is 43.3% change in dividend payout due to the changes in Provision for taxation. 93

Model Sum of Squares ANOVA a Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 26.735 1 26.735 4.054.138 b 1 Residual 19.785 3 6.595 Total 46.520 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), PT The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 4.054, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of provision for taxation on the dividend payout of the CIPLA LTD. Model Unstandardized B Std. Error Standardized Beta T Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Bound Upper Bound (Constant) 34.373 8.416 4.084.027 7.589 61.157 1 TX -.976.485 -.758-2.013.138-2.518.567 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from provision for taxation can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 34.373 - (0.976*provision for taxation) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for provision for taxation is equal to 0.976. This means that for every additional increase in provision for taxation, dividend payout decreases by 0.976. 94

5.2.8 DR.REDDY LTD YEAR LIQUIDITY SIZE & LEVERAGE(DEB PROVISION DIVIDEND (CURRENT GROWTH(TOT T-EQUITY FOR PAYOUT RATIO) AL ASSETS) RATIO) TAXATION 2007-08 13.35 3.850041 12.60179 0.096078 18.64069 2008-09 18.88 3.25057 11.72978 0.121751 23.11172 2009-10 22.59 2.146451 9.399312 0.095222 22.00406 2010-11 21.42 1.402888 41.36552 0.106226 15.06797 2011-12 25.67 1.607844 11.62856 0.083435 27.5413 (Table no: 5.8 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables DR.REDDY LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1 -.879 *.076 -.365.506 DPY Sig. (2-tailed).049.903.546.385 -.879 * 1 -.508.342 -.061 LQ Sig. (2-tailed).049.382.573.922.076 -.508 1.231 -.743 SG Sig. (2-tailed).903.382.709.150 -.365.342.231 1 -.354 LV Sig. (2-tailed).546.573.709.559.506 -.061 -.743 -.354 1 PT Sig. (2-tailed).385.922.150.559 *. is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). 95

POSIVIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout ratio shows weak correlations with growth and partial correlations with provision for taxation. Liquidity and leverage are weakly correlated whereas growth and leverage are also weakly correlated. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout ratio shows negative correlation with liquidity and leverage. Liquidity, growth and provision for taxation are negatively correlated. Provision for taxation and leverage are also negatively correlated. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.879 that indicates low correlation between dividend payout and liquidity. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Liquidity on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LIQUIDITY(CURRENT RATIO) 2007-08 13.35 3.85 2008-09 18.88 3.25 2009-10 22.59 2.15 2010-11 21.42 1.40 2011-12 25.67 1.61 TABLE 5.8.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR DR.REDDY LTD. Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.879 a.773.698 2.54408 a. Predictors: (Constant), LQ Th0.e above table indicates that the value of R for DR.REDDY LTD. is 87.9% that refers there is a positive linear correlation between explanatory variables such as liquidity and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for DR.REDDY LTD. is 0.698. It indicates that there is 69.8% change in dividend payout due to the changes in liquidity. 96

Model Sum of Squares ANOVA a Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 66.204 1 66.204 10.229.049 b 1 Residual 19.417 3 6.472 Total 85.621 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LQ The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 10.229, p <0.05 (i.e., the regression model is fit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is no significant impact of liquidity on the dividend payout of the DR.REDDY LID. Model Unstandardized B Std. Error a Standardized Beta T Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Bound Upper Bound (Constant) 29.786 3.153 9.447.003 19.752 39.821 1 LQ -3.836 1.199 -.879-3.198.049-7.653 -.019 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from liquidity can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 29.786 - (3.836*liquidity) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for liquidity is equal to 3.836. This means that for every additional increase in liquidity, dividend payout decreases by 3.836. 97

5.2.9 SUNPHARMA LTD YEAR SIZE & LEVERAGE LIQUIDITY PROVISION DIVIDEND GROWTH (DEBT- (CURRENT FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL EQUITY RATIO) TAXATION ASSETS) RATIO) 2007-08 14.03 2.836518 10.01318 0.02436 3.630489 2008-09 22.51 2.991477 19.65418 0.004581 2.323607 2009-10 31.6 2.780125 10.77772 0.005159 5.32027 2010-11 26.12 5.966569 29.74347 0.020867 4.828061 2011-12 25.93 3.898773 20.04312 0.029779 1.639819 (Table no: 5.9 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of SUNPHARMA LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1.225.244 -.377.331 Sig. (2-tailed).716.692.532.586.225 1.905 *.398.199 Sig. (2-tailed).716.035.507.749.244.905 * 1.210 -.086 Sig. (2-tailed).692.035.735.891 -.377.398.210 1 -.340 Sig. (2-tailed).532.507.735.575.331.199 -.086 -.340 1 Sig. (2-tailed).586.749.891.575 *. is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). 98

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows weak correlation with liquidity; growth and provision for taxation. Liquidity and growth are significant and strong positively correlated. Whereas liquidity, leverage and provision for taxation are weakly correlated. Growth and leverage also weakly correlated. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows negative correlation with leverage. Provision for taxation, growth and leverage are negatively correlated. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.377 that indicates low correlation between dividend payout and leverage. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Leverage on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LEVERAGE(DEBT-EQUITY RATIO) 2007-08 14.03 0.02 2008-09 22.51 0.00 2009-10 31.6 0.01 2010-11 26.12 0.02 2011-12 25.93 0.03 TABLE 5.9.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR SUNPHARMA LTD. Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.377 a.142 -.144 6.92298 a. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table indicates that the value of R for SUN PHARMA LTD. is 37.7% that refers there is a weak linear correlation between explanatory variables such as leverage and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for SUN PHARMA LTD. is -0.144. It indicates that there is no change in dividend payout due to the changes in leverage. 99

Model Sum of Squares ANOVA a Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 23.810 1 23.810.497.532 b 1 Residual 143.783 3 47.928 Total 167.593 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LV The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 0.497, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of leverage on the dividend payout of the SUN PHARMA LTD. a Unstandardized Standardized 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Model T Sig. Std. Lower Upper B Beta Error Bound Bound (Constant) 27.641 5.977 4.625.019 8.621 46.661 1 LV -212.590 301.617 -.377 -.705.532-1172.472 747.291 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from leverage can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 27.641 - (212.590*leverage) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for leverage is equal to 212.590. This means that for every additional increase in leverage, dividend payout decreases by 212.590. 100

5.2.10 INFOSYS YEAR SIZE & LIQUIDITY LEVERAGE PROVISION DIVIDEND GROWTH (CURRENT (DEBT-EQUITY FOR PAYOUT (TOTAL RATIO) RATIO) TAXATION ASSETS) 2007-08 16.94 6.703399 20.85648 #VALUE! 12.35294 2008-09 23.12 4.718003 25.29 #VALUE! 13.33035 2009-10 24.91 4.457346 24.77866 #VALUE! 22.97912 2010-11 41.87 5.282334 29.57607 0.00102 26.95839 2011-12 43.14 4.880819 24.1249 0.000706 28.02812 (Table no: 5.10 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of INFOSYS) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1 -.376.652.933 *.906 * Sig. (2-tailed).533.233.021.034 -.376 1 -.500 -.090 -.473 Sig. (2-tailed).533.391.885.421.652 -.500 1.689.582 Sig. (2-tailed).233.391.198.303.933 * -.090.689 1.795 Sig. (2-tailed).021.885.198.108.906 * -.473.582.795 1 Sig. (2-tailed).034.421.303.108 *. is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). 101

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows significant strong positive correlations with leverage and provision for taxation. It shows partial correlation with growth. Growth, leverage and provision for taxation are partially correlated. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows negative correlation with liquidity. Liquidity, Growth and provision for taxation are negatively correlated. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.376 that indicates low correlation between dividend payout and liquidity. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Liquidity on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LIQUIDITY(CURRENT RATIO) 2007-08 16.94 6.70 2008-09 23.12 4.72 2009-10 24.91 4.46 2010-11 41.87 5.28 2011-12 43.14 4.88 TABLE 5.10.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR INFOSYS Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.376 a.141 -.145 12.63098 a. Predictors: (Constant), LQ The above table indicates that the value of R for INFOSYS is37.6% that refers there is a weak linear correlation between explanatory variables such as liquidity and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for INFOSYS is -14.5. It indicates that there is no change in dividend payout due to the changes in liquidity. 102

ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression 78.738 1 78.738.494.533 b 1 Residual 478.625 3 159.542 Total 557.363 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LQ The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 0.494, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of liquidity on the dividend payout of the INFOSYS LTD. Model Unstandardized B Std. Error. a Standardized Beta T Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Bound Upper Bound (Constant) 56.026 37.481 1.495.232-63.255 175.307 1 LQ -4.998 7.114 -.376 -.703.533-27.638 17.642 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from liquidity can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend pay out = 56.026 - (4.998*liquidity) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for liquidity is equal to -4.998.This means that for every additional increase liquidity, dividend payout decreases by 4.998. 103

YEAR 5.2.11 TCS LTD DIVIDEND PAYOUT LIQUIDITY (CURRENT RATIO) SIZE & GROWTH (TOTAL ASSETS) LEVERAGE (DEBT- EQUITY RATIO) PROVISION FOR TAXATION 2007-08 31.9 2.040646 36.40147 0.001636 9.892086 2008-09 30.5 1.887053 21.94903 0.003049 8.638132 2009-10 32.7 1.489709 11.78808 0.002381 11.78964 2010-11 35.2 1.71814 71.42575 0.015935 12.98851 2011-12 37.2 1.871647 31.54782 0.022811 17.88119 (Table no: 5.11 Dividend payout ratio and all independent variables of TCS LTD.) In order to know the correlation of different variables with dividend payout above table is used and on the basis of that, below correlation matrix is as follows: DPY LQ SG LV PT s DPY LQ SG LV PT 1 -.122.431.945 *.967 ** Sig. (2-tailed).845.469.015.007 -.122 1.168.023 -.133 Sig. (2-tailed).845.787.971.831.431.168 1.488.192 Sig. (2-tailed).469.787.404.758.945 *.023.488 1.905 * Sig. (2-tailed).015.971.404.034.967 ** -.133.192.905 * 1 Sig. (2-tailed).007.831.758.034 *. is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **. is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 104

POSITIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout is significant and strong positively correlated with leverage and provision for taxation. Dividend payout is weakly correlated with growth. Liquidity, growth and leverage are weakly correlated. Growth, leverage and provision for taxation are also weakly correlated. Leverage shows significant and strong positive relationship with provision for taxation. NEGATIVE CORRELATION: Dividend payout shows negative correlation with liquidity. Provision for taxation and liquidity are negatively correlated. Considering above correlation matrix least correlated value is -0.122 that indicates low correlation between dividend payout and liquidity. Simple regression method is used in order to know the Influence of Liquidity on dividend payout which can be extracted from below table. YEAR DIVIDEND PAYOUT LIQUIDITY(CURRENT RATIO) 2007-08 31.9 2.04 2008-09 30.5 1.89 2009-10 32.7 1.49 2010-11 35.2 1.72 2011-12 37.2 1.87 TABLE 5.11.1: SIMPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS FOR TCSLTD. Output of simple regression Model Summary Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate 1.122 a.015 -.314 3.07429 a. Predictors: (Constant), LQ The above table indicates that the value of R for TCS LTD. is 12.2% that refers there is a weak linear correlation between explanatory variables such as liquidity and the dependent variable i.e. Dividend payout of the company. Value of adjusted R- Square for TCS LTD. is -0.314. It indicates that there is no change in dividend payout due to the changes in liquidity. 105

ANOVA a Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. Regression.426 1.426.045.845 b 1 Residual 28.354 3 9.451 Total 28.780 4 a. Dependent Variable: DPR b. Predictors: (Constant), LQ The above table shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, F (1, 3) = 0.045, p >0.05 (i.e., the regression model is unfit for the data). It indicates that null hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is no significant impact of liquidity on the dividend payout of TCS. Model Unstandardized B Std. Error a Standardized Beta T Sig. 95.0% Confidence Interval for B Lower Bound Upper Bound (Constant) 36.323 13.363 2.718.073-6.205 78.850 1 LQ -1.567 7.379 -.122 -.212.845-25.049 21.915 a. Dependent Variable: DPR From the above table, the general form of the equation to predict dividend payout from liquidity can be obtained as under: Predicted dividend payout = 36.323 - (1.567*liquidity) Unstandardized coefficients indicate how much the dependent variable varies with an Independent variable when all other independent variables are held constant. In the above table, the unstandardized coefficient for liquidity is equal to -1.567. This means that for every additional increase in liquidity, dividend payout Decreases by 1.567. 106