Mean Monthly Household Income and Expenditure, 2014 (RM)

Similar documents
INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN MARCH 2015

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN JULY 2014

Figure 1. Inflation measured by CPI by months

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN SEPTEMBER

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN NOVEMBER

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN AUGUST 2013

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN OCTOBER 2012

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN SEPTEMBER 2016

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN APRIL 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN JULY 2016

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN MARCH 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN AUGUST 2018

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN MARCH 2018

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN JULY 2018

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN AUGUST 2016

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN FEBRUARY 2018

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN SEPTEMBER 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN APRIL 2016

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN FEBRUARY 2016

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN MARCH

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN APRIL 2014

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN JULY 2015

Figure 1. Inflation measured by CPI by months

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN NOVEMBER 2011

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN APRIL 2018

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN MAY 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN AUGUST 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN JULY 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN DECEMBER 2017

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN JUNE 2011

INFLATION AND CONSUMER PRICE INDICES IN OCTOBER 2010

Federal Republic of Somalia Ministry of Planning, Investment and Economic Development Directorate of National Statistics CONSUMER PRICE INDEX

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Table 1.3 : Demand side growth in GDP, growth contribution and relative share (figures in per cent at market prices) Growth of GDP

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND MINISTRY OF NATIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT Central Statistics Department OFFICIAL RELEASE

Cost of Living Survey Report

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND Central Statistics Department OFFICIAL RELEASE

Implementing Goods and Services Tax in Malaysia

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Cost of Living Survey Report

Inflation rate rises modestly in November

NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS Highlights

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Cost of Living Survey Report

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Cost of Living Survey Report

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

Inflation rate in Camarines Sur decreases to 5.2 percent in June 2018

Cost of Living Survey Report

Namibia Consumer Price Index

Inflation rate in Camarines Sur increases to 5.3 percent in May 2018

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

Inflation rate in Camarines Sur increases to 6.8 percent in September 2017

Consumer Price Index, November, (Base year 2007) Detailed by: Expenditure groups Household welfare levels Household type.

Consumer Price Index

MINISTRY OF PLANNING, INVESTMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (MOPIED)

Cost of Living Survey Report

Consumer Price Index

Norma Chhab Alperin World Bank-ECLAC May 2018

D R L I M C H E E H A N M R T I M N I K L A S S C H O E P P M S O N G WO O I L E N G ECONOMIC S T U D I E S

Cost of Living Survey Report

Inflation rate in Camarines Sur decreases to 5.1 percent in December 2017

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

Cost of Living Survey Report

MINISRY OF NATIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND Central Statistics Department OFFICIAL RELEASE. Monthly Consumer Price Index

Consumer Price Index, August 2012

The national monthly CPI (2008=100) increased from per cent in September, 2017 to per cent

The annual CPI increased in Juba by 86.8% and in Wau by 118% from September 2014 to September 2015.

Camarines Sur Consumer Price Index

Deflation seen in January at -0.7%

The CPI annual average rate of change was 1.4% in 2017 and the rate of change on a year earlier was 1.5% in December

REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Central Statistics Department OFFICIAL RELEASE

Consumer Price Index (Base year 2014) Consumer Price Index

The annual CPI increased in Juba by 225.8% and in Wau by 255.5% from March 2015 to March 2016.

MINISTRY OF NATIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REPUBLIC OF SOMALILAND Central Statistics Department OFFICIAL RELEASE

The CPI annual average rate of change was 0.3% in 2013 and the rate of change on a year earlier was 0.2% in December

Norma Chhab Alperin World Bank/ECLAC May 2018

The annual CPI increased in Juba by 107.9% and in Wau by 115% from December 2014 to December 2015.

Headline and Core Inflation December 2009

Headline and Core Inflation December 2017

The CPI annual average rate of change was -0.3% in 2014 and the rate of change on a year earlier was -0.4% in December

Aggregate GCC Consumer Price Index inflation estimates

CPI annual rate of change increased to 1.5%

CPI annual rate of change was 2.0% in April

Namibia Consumer Price Index

CONSUMER PRICE INDEX

CPI annual rate of change increased to 0.7%

The practice of calculating the consumer price index in Georgia and the methodological issues for its improvement

Headline and Core Inflation March 2018

CPI annual rate of change increased to 1.5% in November

Transcription:

Be Prepared for Subsidy-Free System Zafri Zulkeffeli Research Officer Malaysian Institute of Economic Research (MIER) 1 According to the Department of Statistics Malaysia, low income group in Malaysia also known as B40 (Bottom 40%) group spends almost 80 percent of household income on routine essential expenses whereas T20 (Top 20%) and M40 (Middle 40%) spend about 64 and 48 percent respectively. The gap between household income and expenditure of B40 shows the cost of living is high and there is limited room for future savings. 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 Mean Monthly Household Income and Expenditure, 2014 (RM) 6,141 3,578 14,305 6,899 5,662 3,629 2,537 Malaysia T20 M40 B40 2,027 Mean Monthly Income Mean Monthly Expenditure Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia (Household Income & Expenditure Survey 2014) Consumer price index data shows 30 percent of average Malaysian s expenditure is on foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Those living in rural areas and income group below RM3,000 spend almost 40 percent on foods. 1 The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of MIER. 1

Weight by Group Category and Price Indexes, 2016 Type of Price Indexes Main Groups Urban Rural Income Below RM3,000 Food & Non-Alcoholic Beverages 30.2 29.1 36.3 38.6 Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco 2.9 2.8 3.7 3 Clothing & Footwear 3.3 3.3 3.8 3.4 Housing, Water, Electricity, Gas & Other Fuels 23.8 24.5 19.9 25.1 Furnishings, Household Equip & Routined Household Maintainence 3.8 3.9 3.6 3 Health 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.6 Transport 13.7 13.7 13.5 10.2 Communication 5.2 5.4 4.5 3.8 Recreation Services & Culture 4.9 5 3.9 3.2 Education 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.7 Restaurants & Hotels 2.9 2.9 2.3 2.2 Miscellaneous Goods & Services 6.5 6.5 6.3 5.2 Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia In October 2016, the Malaysian government reduced the subsidy on cooking oil price. It is part of the rationalization program in order to adjust federal government s balance sheet while improving market efficiency and to curb the smuggling of subsidized cooking oil into neighboring countries. The government spends about 20 percent of operating expenditure on subsidies and social assistances in 2013. In the latest 2017 Budget, government is expected to spend about RM22 billion on subsidies and social assistances. That is approximately 10 percent of total operating expenditure. 2

Source: Annual Economic Report Ministry of Finance Starting on January 2017, there will be no subsidy on cooking oil except for 1 kg polybag packet. The ceiling price of 1 kg polybag will rise by 40 cents from RM2.50 to RM2.90 due to subsidy cut. The subsidy rationalization plan also aims at restructuring income distributions by providing social assistances to targeted groups especially the B40. By cutting subsidies, Malaysia is transitioning into free market system. One aspect of free market system is price volatility. Therefore, one question remains pertinent to be answered is whether Malaysians in general are ready to accept a free market system and price volatility. Having high and steady income is the best cushion against the shock from skyrocketing and volatile prices. The latest cut in cooking oil subsidy will directly impact the price of cooking oil to rise. Consequently, the effects of higher cooking oil price will also affect other food-related products. That the prices of food-related products including food in restaurants and stalls, will go up inevitable. This is because businesses will try to maintain profit margins and pass the higher cost to consumers. The headline inflation was low level for the past 9 months. However, food inflation was higher. For instance, average food inflation is 4.1 percent while the headline inflation recorded only 2.2 percent in the period of January until September 2016. This was before the cooking oil subsidy cut. It goes to show that the price of food rises faster than for other goods. The pressure from higher food cost is inevitable and the low-income group is the most affected. 3

Source: Department of Statistics Malaysia The pressure felt by T20 and M40 is less than the B40 due to income level. Increase in cooking oil price has less impact on the consumption pattern of the rich. On the other hand, the poor feel the pinch even with a slight increase in cooking oil price. Those with high income have more room to cushion the higher food prices. Cooking oil is one of the basic items needed by every household. Price movements of basic goods affect the low-income group more than those in the higher-income bracket. Thus, a slight drop in prices of basic goods will see demand from low-income consumers increase and vice versa. To continue subsidies for long term is economically inefficient. It is akin to spoon-feeding. Subsidy provision is not sustainable for long term as it could stifle productivity and lead recipients to become over-dependent on the subsidy. The funds spent on subsidies could be used productively, such as building roads, schools, hospitals, providing scholarships and on programs to expand the economy. The disadvantage of subsidy provision is deadweight loss to the economy where inefficient allocation of resources occur. With the subsidy rationalization plan, the cut in cooking oil subsidy can be used on improving productivity in cooking oil production activities in particular or improving overall productivity in general. For example, to invest in productive infrastructure such as machinery and employing technology to lower production the production cost. Lowering the price of cooking oil by cutting production cost is much more efficient than subsidy. The subsidized cooking oil for the 1kg polybag can be regarded as an exception as it is aimed for the low income group. However, there is no guarantee that the polybag cooking oil will be purchased solely by the B40 group. Better delivery system might be required for example through a coupon system. Only those under-privileged and low income group 4

should be given the coupon to purchase the subsidized polybag cooking oil. Plus, the purchase of the polybag cooking oil shall be limited in order to control and ensure fair distribution. To ensure that the coupon system works efficiently, there must be effective monitoring and screening of recipients. If the coupon system is not transparent, the objective will not be achieved and those in low income group will suffer more. Ultimately, uplift the income and earning power of the B40 is one way to alleviate pressures from cost of living. The transition towards free market must be balanced or compensated by higher household income. Bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia (BR1M) is not an impactful tool to compensate the low income group with the rising cost of living. BR1M is a one-off transfer payment given once a year and the effect is temporary at most. Apart from BR1M or one-off payment, monthly cash transfer even with smaller value may assist the B40 to adapt with the increased in cost of living in the short term. For the medium and long terms, the government should gradually increase national minimum wage and human capital development via education and skills enhancement. Nevertheless, subsidy rationalization is a good move for the long term economic development. Prior to that, a smooth transition from controlled-price system to free market system should be put in place. It is better to have stable economic growth coupled with healthier economic development by ensuring market stability, income equality and wealth distributions as well as affordable cost of living. 5