Network losses in the Swedish network regulation. Kristina Östman The Swedish Energy Markets Inspectorate

Similar documents
The Finnish gas market from regulatory point of view

Scope and policy options for Framework Guidelines on Harmonised transmission tariff structures. -Public Hearing -

DSO tariffs Current issues in Finland. NordREG seminar on DSO tariffs in the Nordic countries November 3rd 2016 Matti Ilonen

12 Months Master Pay Scale Salary Table

Regulatory asset base (RAB) for network tariff setting

Regulation and network losses in Finland. NordREG 27th April 2017 Mikko Friipyöli

Reviewing and Approving Investments and Network Development Plans. Casestudy: Lithuania

European Distribution System Operators for Smart Grids

Proposed Smart Solutions in the Clean Energy package Proposed smart solutions in the Clean Energy package

CEER Report on Investment Conditions in European Countries

3 rd Technical Workshop: Gas Market Design and Natural Gas Transmission Grid Codes

Congestion Management Guidelines. Compliance report

DEFINITION AND PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS TO SUPPORT EUROPEAN GRID OPERATORS TO ENABLE THE ENERGY POLICY GOALS

SINGLE ELECTRICITY MARKET COMMITTEE

Decision on Electricity Network Connection Policy

We appreciate your feedback

It is essential that the QCA reality checks its assumptions and calculations prior to making its final Determination.

I-SEM Interconnector Losses. Information Paper

Quick Guide to the Integrated Single Electricity Market. Version 1

Reviewing and approving capital investment plans: The Lithuanian experience

The current ETSO ITC Model and possible development

Gas Market Modelling for the Quo Vadis Project 26 July, Budapest, Hungary. Memo on the Q&A session of the Workshop

Year-End Report. January December 2016.

MAIN REGULATORY ISSUES FOR INVESTORS

EVALUATION OF INVESTMENTS IN ELECTRICITY AND GAS TRANSMISSION NETWORKS

CEER Workshop on Power Losses European experiences in the treatment of losses / Summary of a survey among NRAs

The Role of Investment Philosophy In Evaluating Investment Managers

Features of tariffs in electricity sector in Serbia

Summary of the CEER Report on Investment Conditions in European Countries

Irish Water 2019 Revenue Control

BNetzA s role in energy infrastructure regulation and planning/permitting

WEIGHTED AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL

Report on regulation and the electricity market. Norway

(7) This proposal is submitted for the approval of all National Regulatory Authorities (hereafter referred to as the NRAs ) of the CCR GRIT.

BETTER EUROPEAN STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP. Results from the EC project RES Support Schemes and Cooperation Mechanisms in Europe

ENTSO-E Network Code on Electricity Balancing

Attachment C: How capital expenditure is proposed and approved under the capex IM

20 December Fluxys Belgium SA

Economics of Price Regulation

Work Programme Nordic Energy Regulators (NordREG)

The EU Framework for Deposit Guarantee Schemes

Tariff for Virtual Reverse Flow Product at Moffat

South East Europe Electricity Market options paper

Understanding the Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC)

Vision Paper LT UIOLI

On 30 July, Ofgem published Draft Determinations (DDs) for the remaining 10 electricity distribution

Publication according to Art. 30 Regulation (EU) 2017/460 (NC Tariffs)

All Baltic CCR TSOs Common Proposal for Regional Design of Long-Term Transmission Rights in Accordance with Article 31 of the Commission Regulation

The Concept of Baltic CoBA

Methodology and criteria for evaluating investments in electricity and gas infrastructure projects (Article 13(6) Infrastructure Regulation 1 )

2018 EX-ANTE CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE SINGLE RESOLUTION FUND (SRF)

Response to ENTSOE public consultation. Network Code on Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for. Electricity

ON TRANSFER CAPACITY ALLOCATION OVER THE GRID INTERCONNECTING ITALY WITH FRANCE FOR THE YEAR 2004

Kontakt DW Unser Zeichen Ihr Zeichen Datum Alexandra Gruber 211 AG/Ha 19/

Treatment of Losses by Network Operators an ERGEG Position Paper for public consultation

Management recommends the following enhancements to these modifications to the provisions for commitment costs:

Deep dive Grid & Infrastructure Sell Slide Brunch, Essen. innogy SE Bernd Böddeling CFO Grid & Infrastructure 1 December 2016

CALCULATION THE REVENUE REQUIREMENTS. prof. Vidmantas Jankauskas honorary ERRA member

Why cross-border markets for frequency control are necessary

Offshore transmission investments How to regulate these investments? Who should act?

INQUIRY INTO THE FUNDING ARANGEMENTS OF HORIZON POWER

Enexis Holding N.V. Annual results Maarten Blacquière, CFO 8 March 2016

APPROVAL BY ALL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AGREED AT THE ENERGY REGULATORS FORUM

C2-102 COMMON NORDIC BALANCE MANAGEMENT. K.LINDSTRÖM FINGRID (Finland)

Guidelines for improvement network regulation for enhancing the share of DG DSO revenues and incentives to integrate DG

Provisions on the management of the Government Pension Fund

1. Foreword Main developments in the gas and electricity market The electricity market Wholesale...

Smart Contracts for Smart Grid: Harnessing the Potential of Blockchain Technology for Future Energy Systems

Approach to Assessing Capital Expenditure for Price Reviews

Link to the simplified model Parameters applied for the simplified model:

NordREG s status update to EMG July June Approved by NordREG Board

Draft price control determination notice: company-specific appendix South West Water

MIC Administration Policy for customers connected to the Transmission System

DS3 System Services Protocol Regulated Arrangements

Integration of the Nordic Electricity Grids

South West Water Business Plan Update Ofwat s Draft Determination

Technical Assistance to Develop Policy Guidelines for the Distribution Network Tariffs

MYPD Methodology Eskom Response to Consultation Paper

Issues Paper on Proposed Revisions to the Western Power Network Access Arrangement (2017/18 to 2021/22 - AA4)

Downstream natural gas in Europe the role of upstream oil and gas companies

Developments in Polish Electricity and Gas Market. EFET Board Brainstorming August 29, 2013, Warsaw

GIBRALTAR EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND INVESTMENT FOR GROWTH AND JOBS GOAL MONITORING COMMITTEE

Case study on the application of TOTEX benchmarking model in Germany

ERGEG Public Consultation on Guidelines on Transmission Tarification 1. - Evaluation of the Comments Received

EIS in January Edition

Gas Networks Ireland Transmission Tariffs and Tariff Information 2018/19

Order Handling and Execution Policy Asset Class Specific Appendices Rates Appendix

Decentralised energy trading first results of the Enerchain project Michael Merz - PONTON GmbH

Guidance and Implementation Document

Imbalance Settlement and Reconciliation: Experiences with a New Market Process

- a leading energy company in the Nordic area

Smart Electricity Grid Security and Interoperability Gianluca Fulli - 25/10/16, Rome

Financial Instruments DG Regional and Urban Policy Budapest 24th April 2015

EgyptEra Regulatory Framework to Develop RES Projects in Egypt

AA4 submission No. 5: Western Power s proposed price control mechanisms 11 December 2017

The Nordic Market Model 10 Years of Experience

MYPD 3 (Year 2013/14) Regulatory Clearing Account Submission to NERSA

GZC Investment Management Limited. Disclosure under Pillar 3 of Capital Requirements Directive. Date: March 2015

FINANCIAL ANALYSIS. A. Background

Evaluation of responses to the public consultation on the proposal for pricing intraday cross-zonal capacity

Transcription:

Network losses in the Swedish network regulation Kristina Östman The Swedish Energy Markets Inspectorate

A regulated revenue cap The revenue cap sets the upper limit on how much the DSO or TSO is allowed to charge their customers Reasonable coverage for their operational costs and reasonable return on the invested capital Ex-ante regulation: if forecast does not match the outcome input to the next period (can save surplus one period)

The Swedish revenue cap Average: Controllable costs Controllable operational costs Non-controllable operational costs Capital base (age adjusted) Non-controllable costs Capital costs Efficiency requirement Depreciation Return (WACC) 44% 23% 33% Operational costs Capital costs Adjustment for quality and efficient network utilisation Adjustments for earlier periods over or under charging 4-year revenue cap

Losses in the Swedish revenue cap Controllable operational costs Non-controllable operational costs Capital base (age adjusted) Efficiency requirement Depreciation Return (WACC) Adjustment for quality and efficient network utilisation Operational costs Capital costs Adjustments for earlier periods over or under charging 4-year revenue cap

Non-controllable operational costs Operational costs that the network companies cannot influence Includes: Costs for network losses Costs for connections to and tariffs for overlying and neighbouring networks Costs for reimbursing production units who reduce network costs ( nätnytta ) Agency fees Based on forecast by the DSO Adjusted after revenue period based on outcome

Losses in the Swedish revenue cap Controllable operational costs Non-controllable operational costs Capital base (age adjusted) Efficiency requirement Depreciation Return (WACC) Adjustment for quality and efficient network utilisation Operational costs Capital costs Adjustments for earlier periods over or under charging 4-year revenue cap

Incentive regulation adjustment for quality and efficient network operation Ei shall take into account the performance of the DSOs when calculating the revenue cap Reliability of supply incentive scheme Introduced in 2012, but more detailed method from 2016 Efficient network utilisation (smart grid) incentive scheme New from 2016

Incentive scheme for efficient network utilisation EU Energy Efficiency Directive requirement to incentivise DSOs to utilise networks efficiently Ei has developed two indicators to measure efficient network utilisation: (a) network losses and (b) load factor combined with the cost to overlying network Losses and cost for overlying network are categorised as non-controllable costs, not 100 % non-controllable with the incentive

Incentive for reducing network losses Incentive scheme: The adjustment is proportional to 0.5 [changed cost for losses between the own norm period and the outcome] Can be an addition or a reduction to the revenue cap 0.5 DSO and customers equally share savings and cost increases

Integrating adjustments in the revenue cap The outcomes from reliability and efficient utilization (losses and load factor) calculations are summarised potential addition or reduction on the return Can give a maximum change of the revenue cap of ±5 % (changed from ±3 % in 2016), but never more than the return, for the four year period

Ongoing regulatory work on network losses Government assignment on overseeing the economic regulation for network companies Network losses is one part Deadline October 2017 Project on developing the incentives for quality and efficient network utilisation Two master thesis projects on efficient network usage: Developing a benchmarking norm for losses? Aim to give long-term incentive for loss reduction Higher weighting for days with high demand when calculating average load factor?

Any questions?