IMPLICATIONS OF LOW PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH FOR DEBT SUSTAINABILITY

Similar documents
Corrigendum. OECD Pensions Outlook 2012 DOI: ISBN (print) ISBN (PDF) OECD 2012

Approach to Employment Injury (EI) compensation benefits in the EU and OECD

The Outlook for the U.S. Economy and the Policies of the New President

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2016

PENSIONS IN OECD COUNTRIES: INDICATORS AND DEVELOPMENTS

8-Jun-06 Personal Income Top Marginal Tax Rate,

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2018

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2017

Empirical appendix of Public Expenditure Distribution, Voting, and Growth

Low employment among the 50+ population in Hungary

The Case for Fundamental Tax Reform: Overview of the Current Tax System

COMPARISON OF RIA SYSTEMS IN OECD COUNTRIES

Pension Fund Investment and Regulation - An International Perspective and Implications for China s Pension System

Recommendation of the Council on Tax Avoidance and Evasion

Statistical annex. Sources and definitions

Growth in OECD Unit Labour Costs slows to 0.4% in the third quarter of 2016

Burden of Taxation: International Comparisons

Reporting practices for domestic and total debt securities

OECD HEALTH SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS SURVEY 2012

Improving data on pharmaceuticals. Meeting of OECD Health Data National Correspondents 3-4 october 2011

Investing for our Future Welfare. Peter Whiteford, ANU

Ways to increase employment

Sources of Government Revenue in the OECD, 2014

LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS OF PUBLIC PENSION EXPENDITURE

Ageing and employment policies: Ireland

DANMARKS NATIONALBANK

A Comparison of the Tax Burden on Labor in the OECD, 2017

Tax Burden, Tax Mix and Economic Growth in OECD Countries

Statistical Annex ANNEX

Statistical Annex. Sources and definitions

Household Financial Wealth By Selected Country

10% 10% 15% 15% Caseload: WE. 15% Caseload: SS 10% 10% 15%

Priorities for Productivity and Income (PPIs) Country Results

Sources of Government Revenue across the OECD, 2015

Guidance on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting

The OECD s Society at a Glance Simon Chapple OECD ELS/SPD Villa Vigoni, Italy, 9-11 th March 2011

TAXATION OF TRUSTS IN ISRAEL. An Opportunity For Foreign Residents. Dr. Avi Nov

Financial wealth of private households worldwide

Double-Taxing Capital Income: How Bad Is the Problem?

Constraints on Exchange Rate Flexibility in Transition Economies: a Meta-Regression Analysis of Exchange Rate Pass-Through

Annuities: a private solution to longevity risk

Collective Bargaining in OECD and accession countries

OECD Report Shows Tax Burdens Falling in Many OECD Countries

2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MUNICIPAL FISCAL HEALTH U.S. Tax Reform and Its Impact on State and Local Government Finance Presented by Jane L.

Macroeconomic Theory and Policy

Slovak Competitiveness: Fundamentals, Indicators and Challenges

Austerity in the Aftermath of the Great Recession

BETTER POLICIES FOR A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION TO A LOW-CARBON ECONOMY

Performance Budgeting (PB) in OECD Countries

Budget repair and the size of Australia s government. Melbourne Economic Forum John Daley, Grattan Institute December 2015

Switzerland and Germany top the PwC Young Workers Index in developing younger people

FCCC/SBI/2010/10/Add.1

HEALTH LABOUR MARKET TRENDS IN OECD COUNTRIES

TAX POLICY CENTER BRIEFING BOOK. Background. Q. What are the sources of revenue for the federal government?

EMPLOYMENT RATE IN EU-COUNTRIES 2000 Employed/Working age population (15-64 years)

MODULE 9. Guidance to completing the Maturity Analysis module of BSL/2

Introduction to Public Finance

SWM. The impact of reducing pension generosity on schooling and inequality ECON. Miguel Sánchez-Romero 1,2 and Alexia Prskawetz 1,2

COVERAGE OF PRIVATE PENSION SYSTEMS AND MAIN TRENDS IN THE PENSIONS INDUSTRY IN THE OECD

STOXX EMERGING MARKETS INDICES. UNDERSTANDA RULES-BA EMERGING MARK TRANSPARENT SIMPLE

Basic Income as a policy option: Can it add up?

Provincial Government Health Spending and Value for Money: An Overview of Canadian Trends,

SESSION 4A: EXPATRIATES AND INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNEES

Declaration on Environmental Policy

Third Revised Decision of the Council concerning National Treatment

Fiscal Policy in Japan

The Economics of Public Health Care Reform in Advanced and Emerging Economies

Public Pension Spending Trends and Outlook in Emerging Europe. Benedict Clements Fiscal Affairs Department International Monetary Fund March 2013

Programme for Government Joe Reynolds Director Programme for Government and Delivering Social Change

Trust and Fertility Dynamics. Arnstein Aassve, Università Bocconi Francesco C. Billari, University of Oxford Léa Pessin, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Statistics Brief. Investment in Inland Transport Infrastructure at Record Low. Infrastructure Investment. July

Does One Law Fit All? Cross-Country Evidence on Okun s Law

Budget repair and the changing size of Australia s government. Crawford Australian Leadership Forum John Daley, Grattan Institute June 2016

Public Financial Management (PFMx) Module

DATA FOR R&D SPILLOVER PROJECT

Fiscal Projections in OECD Countries: What is produced and what lessons can be learned?

Economic Performance. Lessons from the past and a guide for the future Björn Rúnar Guðmundson, Director

American healthcare: How do we measure up?

American healthcare: How do we measure up?

Table 1. Statutory tax rates on capital income.

- 7 - INSTRUCTIONS FOR PART 2, CALCULATION OF RISK WEIGHTED ASSETS

Double Tax Treaties. Necessity of Declaration on Tax Beneficial Ownership In case of capital gains tax. DTA Country Withholding Tax Rates (%)

Social Expenditure in Japan: Trends and Backgrounds

Developing Housing Finance Systems

Enterprise Europe Network SME growth outlook

San Francisco Retiree Health Care Trust Fund Education Materials on Public Equity

Recommendation of the Council on the Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle

THE SEARCH FOR FISCAL SPACE AND THE NEW CHALLENGES TO BUDGETING. 34 th annual meeting of Senior Budget Officials Paris, 3-4 June, 2013

SKEMA BUSINESS SCHOOL Global risk and the mounting wealth gap Michel Henry Bouchet

Summary of key findings

Statistics Brief. OECD Countries Spend 1% of GDP on Road and Rail Infrastructure on Average. Infrastructure Investment. June

OECD HEALTH DATA 2012 DISSEMINATION AND RESULTS. Marie-Clémence Canaud OECD Health Data National Correspondents Meeting October 12, 2012

(1) employment, (2) informal employment, (3) wage distribution, (4) poverty, (5) labor productivity, and (6) inflation.

Extract from Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising

DEVELOPMENT AID AT A GLANCE

Political Developments & The 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act

International Statistical Release

Open Day 2017 Clearstream execution-to-custody integration Valentin Nehls / Jan Willems. 5 October 2017

Rev. Proc Implementation of Nonresident Alien Deposit Interest Regulations

Income support for older persons in the Republic of Korea : a perspective of older persons

Transcription:

IMPLICATIONS OF LOW PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH FOR DEBT SUSTAINABILITY Neil R. Mehrotra Brown University Peterson Institute for International Economics November 9th, 2017 1 / 13

PUBLIC DEBT AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH OECD ECONOMIES Japan Italy Portugal Belgium United Kingdom Spain France United States Austria Ireland Netherlands Finland New Zealand Canada Germany Australia Sweden Denmark Korea Switzerland Debt to GDP 2015 2000 0 50 100 150 200 Ireland Korea Australia Sweden Japan Denmark Spain Germany Canada France Portugal Austria Netherlands Finland Switzerland United States Belgium New Zealand United Kingdom Italy Labor productivity growth 2010-2016 1990-1999 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 2 / 13

DEBT SERVICING COSTS OECD ECONOMIES Portugal Italy Spain Slovenia Hungary Poland Finland New Zealand France Mexico Switzerland Chile Luxembourg Denmark Israel Korea Australia Sweden Czech Republic Slovak Republic Netherlands Iceland Germany Canada Latvia Belgium Norway Austria United States United Kingdom Japan Ireland Unit fiscal cost: r - g -4.0-2.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 Portugal Italy Spain Slovenia Hungary Poland Finland New Zealand France Mexico Switzerland Chile Luxembourg Denmark Israel Korea Australia Sweden Czech Republic Slovak Republic Netherlands Iceland Germany Canada Latvia Belgium Norway Austria United States United Kingdom Japan Ireland Debt servicing cost -4.00-2.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 US fiscal cost 3 / 13

RESEARCH QUESTION AND APPROACH: Key tradeoff: Persistent r < g implies the increases in debt raise revenues With a large stock of public debt, interest rate reversals impose sizable fiscal costs Approach: Empirical evidence on level and variability of debt servicing costs Interest rate and debt servicing cost projections for the G7 Employ a quantitative model to study implications for debt servicing cost of low productivity growth 4 / 13

Median 0.13-0.35-0.52-0.37 75th percentile 2.82 1.85 1.99 1.26 HISTORICAL DEBT SERVICING COST Fraction < 0 48.8% 55.3% 56.5% 59.7% Fraction < -2% 29.7% 31.7% 34.4% 32.8% Servicing the public debt: No. of observations 2107 1068 131 67 Real interest rate is the long-term nominal interest rate less a three-year moving average of inflation rates. Fraction < 0 is the percentage of years with T t + B g negative t+1 = G net fiscal cost. Fraction t + (1 + r t ) B g < -2% is the percentage of years with net fiscal cost of less than -2%. Statistics based on data set after observations with net fiscal t cost > 10% or less than -10% are dropped. T = G + (r g) B g Using five-year averages - winsorized at +- 10% 17 Advanced Countries United States 1870-2013 1946-2013 1870-2013 1946-2013 Net fiscal cost: r - (g+n) 25th percentile -2.64-2.74-2.15-1.72 Median 0.08-0.38-0.16-1.35 75th percentile 2.28 1.55 1.09 0.57 Fraction < 0 49.3% 54.3% 55.2% 69.2% Fraction < -2% 31.4% 32.6% 31.0% 23.1% No. of observations 493 221 29 13 Real interest rate is the long-term nominal interest rate less a three-year moving average of inflation rates. Fraction < 0 is the percentage of years with negative net fiscal cost. Fraction < -2% is the percentage of years with net fiscal cost of less than -2%. Statistics based on data set after observations with net fiscal cost > 10% or less than -10% are winsorized at thresholds. 5 / 13

DEBT SERVICING COST AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH ADVANCED ECONOMIES: 1870-2013 -.1 -.05 0.05.1 -.2 -.1 0.1.2 Real GDP per capita growth (5-year averages) Fiscal cost (5-year averages) Fitted values 6 / 13

REVERSION SCENARIOS CURRENT G7 COVARIATES Probit specification: P ( fisc i,t+j > 0 X ) = Φ ( c + β f fisc i,t + β p popgrwth i,t + β d dgdp i,t + ɛ i,t ) Reversion Scenarios Countries Likelihood of r > g 5-year forward 10-year forward Debt to GDP ratio Fiscal consolidation Current unit cost Current fiscal cost Fiscal cost if r-g = 1.55% Canada 41.2% 47.9% 67-1.54% -1.03 1.01 France 52.8% 54.8% 96-0.14% -0.14 1.44 Germany 49.0% 57.3% 68-1.62% -1.10 1.02 Italy 83.5% 71.7% 133 2.43% 3.23 2.00 Japan 24.9% 38.1% 198-1.51% -2.98 2.97 United Kingdom 38.2% 48.1% 90-1.84% -1.65 1.35 United States 41.1% 47.9% 76-1.42% -1.08 1.14 Reversion probabilities obtained as fitted values from regression specifications (2) - (3), and (5) - (6) with r - g - n = 0.0054, g = 0.007, n = 0.007, and debt to GDP ratio of 0.7. Optimistic and pessimistic scenarios consider alternatives with g = 0.015 and g = 0 respectively. Fiscal cost (% of GDP) is r - g - n multiplied by debt to GDP ratio of 70%. Probit estimates 7 / 13

DEBT SERVICING COST PROJECTIONS Scenario Summary Countries Canada France Germany Japan Italy UK USA Real interest rates Current: 2012-2017 0.41 0.70-0.25-0.28 2.10 0.26 0.74 Projection: 2018-2025 1.38 1.76-0.25-1.01 1.13 1.71 1.00 GDP per capita growth Current: 2012-2017 0.95 0.27 1.34 1.21-0.49 1.62 1.30 Downside (PIIE estimates) 0.70 0.50 0.50 0.10 0.10 0.50 0.70 Cost of servicing the debt (% of GDP) Current: 2012-2017 -1.00-0.10-1.12-2.93 3.19-1.66-1.08 Projection: 2018-2025 -0.35 0.92-1.12-4.38 1.90-0.35-0.88 Downside (PIIE estimates) -0.18 0.70-0.55-2.18 1.12 0.66-0.43 Real interest rates are averages from 2012-2017 of nominal rates on 10-year government debt less the average inflation rate as measured by a consumer price index (data from OECD). Interest rate projection are obtained from the bilateral VECM model for the G6 and 2-variable VECM for the US. GDP per capita growth rates and population growth are 5-year averages from the OECD and Jorda, Real Schularick interest and Taylor databases raterespectively. projections The debt to obtained GDP ratio is obtained from national 3-variable sources. The unit VECM cost of servicing the debt is simply r - g where g is the sum of population growth and GDP per capita growth. The fiscal cost of servicing the debt is the unit cost multiplied by the stock of debt. Uncertainty bands quite large for real interest rate projections VECM estimates 8 / 13

INTEREST RATE DETERMINATION IN A LIFECYCLE MODEL Debt servicing cost: (( 1 + r ( g, n, B g )) (1 + g) (1 + n) ) B g Quantitative 56-period lifecycle model Households face lifecycle profile of income, save for retirement, and face mortality risk Calibrate to US labor share, I/Y, real interest rate r, risk premia 9 / 13

EFFECT OF PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH ON US FISCAL COST MODEL INTEREST RATE ELASTICITIES 2.0% 1.5% Real Interest Rate 1.0% 0.5% IES = 0.5 IES = 1 IES = 2 45 degree line 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% Productivity Growth 10 / 13

EFFECT OF DEBT TO GDP RATIO ON US FISCAL COST 20.0% 19.8% 19.6% Taxes (% of GDP) 19.4% 19.2% 19.0% 18.8% 18.6% 18.4% 18.2% 18.0% 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Debt to GDP Ratio 11 / 13

DEBT SUSTAINABILITY IN SMALL OPEN Debt servicing cost: ECONOMIES ((1 + r (g, n )) (1 + g) (1 + n)) B g Evidence of a stronger common component in rates than growth Key determinant: deviation of g from global prod. growth g Indirect channels: real exchange rate and financial stability Evidence that when US real rates are low, RER appreciates, loan growth increases, house prices increase Int l spillovers 12 / 13

Lessons: KEY TAKEAWAYS On average, cost of servicing the debt is frequently negative Nevertheless, servicing cost shows substantial variability and a moderate likelihood of reversion in medium term Slower productivity growth may benefit debt sustainability by lowering real interest rate Even with r < g, revenue-maximizing level of debt is lower Limitations: r g not a sufficient statistic for optimal level of debt Abstracted from any constraints on real rates due to the ZLB 13 / 13

Additional Slides 14 / 13

COST OF SERVICING THE US PUBLIC DEBT 30% 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% Fiscal cost: r-g-n Fiscal cost, 5-yr MA -30% 1872 1882 1892 1902 1912 1922 1932 1942 1952 1962 1972 1982 1992 2002 2012 Back 15 / 13

REVERSION LIKELIHOODS Probit specification: ( P ) fisc i,t+j > 0 X Probit Regressions Using five-year averages - winsorized at +- 10% ) = Φ (c + β f fisc i,t + β p popgrwth i,t + β d dgdp i,t + ɛ i,t 5-year forward: (r > g+n) 10-year forward (r > g+n) Variable (2) (3) (5) (6) Current value: r - (g+n) 12.483*** 25.869*** 5.707*** 12.895*** (1.174) (3.430) (1.421) (3.281) Debt to GDP ratio -0.146-0.142-0.212-0.204 (0.183) (0.280) (0.189) (0.315) Population growth -29.185** -24.618-24.450** -28.148 (11.762) (23.497) (10.973) (22.866) Constant 0.363** 0.373* 0.300** 0.483** (0.145) (0.200) (0.143) (0.207) McFadden pseudo R-squared 0.120 0.260 0.037 0.110 No. of observations 448 204 431 187 The dependent variable is a dummy variable that takes a value of 1 if the fiscal cost measure is positive (i.e. r > g+n) in next period (1-5 years forward) and in the subsequent period (6-10 years forward) respectively. Columns (1) and (4) do not include population growth; columns (3) and (6) limit the sample to the postwar period. Each column presents a separate regression. Standard errors are clustered at the country level. *** are coefficients significant at the 1% level, ** are coefficients significant at the 5% level, and * are coefficients Back 16 / 13

EXTERNAL AND FINANCIAL SPILLOVERS TO SMALL OPEN ECONOMIES Fixed effects specification: y i,t = c i + δ1 t + δ lag 1 t 1 + ɛ i,t Fixed Effect Regressions External Real exchange rate Financial Mortgage loan growth Dependent variable Current account Loan growth House prices (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) US real rate (< 1%) 0.000-0.033*** 0.007 0.004 0.009 (0.003) (0.004) (0.006) (0.008) (0.006) US real rate (< 1%, 5 yr. lag) -0.012** 0.023*** 0.031*** 0.030*** 0.021* (0.005) (0.005) (0.007) (0.008) (0.010) H0: Sum of current and one lag -0.012* -0.010* 0.038*** 0.034*** 0.030** (0.006) (0.005) (0.008) (0.010) (0.012) Country fixed effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No. of observations 208 208 208 208 190 The dependent variable is described in the first row, the independent variable is a dummy variable that is equal to 1 when US real interest rates are below 1%. Each column presents a separate regression. Standard errors are clustered at the country level. *** are coefficients significant at the 1% level, ** are coefficients significant at the 5% level, and * are coefficients significant at the 10% level. Back 17 / 13

COMMON COMPONENT IN RATES AND GDP GROWTH 15.0% 15.0% 10.0% 10.0% 5.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% 0.0% -10.0% -5.0% -15.0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010-10.0% 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 18 / 13

VECM specification: VECM Estimates VECM ESTIMATES OF REAL RATES J y t = γ + αβy t 1 + Π j y t j + ɛ t j=1 Countries Canada France Germany Japan Italy UK USA Cointegration coefficients US real interest rate -0.96** -0.83** -0.76** -1.40** -1.58** -1.45** N/A (0.12) (0.14) (0.13) (0.28) (0.27) (0.35) N/A Local GDP per capita growth 0.82** 0.01-0.65** -0.06 0.26 2.62** -4.50** (0.13) (0.16) (0.11) (0.15) (0.23) (0.44) (0.89) Error-correction coefficients Local real interest rate -0.22** -0.44** -0.11-0.06-0.21** -0.07** N/A (0.07) (0.09) (0.08) (0.08) (0.07) (0.02) N/A US real interest rate -0.10-0.005 0.19** 0.19** 0.08-0.04 0.01 (0.08) (0.08) (0.09) (0.05) (0.06) (0.03) (0.02) Johansen trace statistic H0: No cointegrating relationship 65.93** 44.48** 40.98** 33.26* 27.81 63.40** 28.96** Lag specification Criterion AIC AIC AIC AIC AIC AIC AIC Lag length 2 2 2 2 4 2 3 No. of observations 64 64 64 64 62 64 63 Each column presents a separate estimation of a vector error correction model assuming 1 cointegration vector and consisting of the local long-term real interest rate, the long-term US real interest rate, and local GDP per capita growth. Data are from 1950-2015 and presents cointegration coefficients and error correction coefficients for local and US rates (error-correction term for GDP per capita and lag coefficients are suppressed). Estimates via maximum likelihood and Johansen trace statistic critical values are 29.68 and 35.65 at the 5% and 1% levels. ** are coefficients significant at the 1% level, and * are coefficients significant at the 5% level. 19 / 13

REAL INTEREST RATE PROJECTIONS: US AND UK 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 Real interest rate VECM forecast VECM (4 country) 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 0.00-2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00-1.00 Real interest rate VECM forecast VECM (4 country) -4.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025-2.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 20 / 13

REAL INTEREST RATE PROJECTIONS: JAPAN AND GERMANY 6.00 7.00 4.00 Real interest rate VECM forecast VECM (4 country) 6.00 5.00 Real interest rate VECM forecast VECM (4 country) 2.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00-2.00 0.00-4.00-1.00-2.00-6.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025-3.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 21 / 13

REAL INTEREST RATE PROJECTIONS: FRANCE AND ITALY 8.00 7.00 6.00 Real interest rate VECM forecast 10.00 8.00 Real interest rate VECM forecast 5.00 6.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00-1.00-2.00-2.00-3.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025-4.00 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Back 22 / 13