FORECLOSURE NOTICES SOAR, FORECLOSURE SALES DROP

Similar documents
CALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE FILINGS DROP

> 801 to 1600 OJT Hours. 1st Semester. Addt'l Wage or Approved ERISA Plan. 1 Alameda $30.08 $19.55 $2.00 $8.53 $33.69 $21.90 $2.00 $9.

Enrollment Statistics Northern Counties Region 1

SJ JUMBO PROGRAM. Single Family, PUD, Detached/Attached Condo with Loan Score >720. Attached Condo with Loan Score <720 Min.

DEDUCTIONS EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, NOVEMBER 30, MONTHLY PREMIUM

California s Unemployment Rate Increases To 10.5 Percent

Superior Court of California, County of Monterey PUBLIC NOTICE

2-50 Small Group BeneFits Monthly Rates

2-50 Small Group EmployeeChoice Monthly Rates

SAN LORENZO VALLEY WATER DISTRICT SUMMARY OF RESERVE FUNDS TARGET FUND LEVELS 6/30/2015 (*)

APPLICATION FOR CREDIT

WAGES AND FRINGES SCHEDULE 2-A

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA LABORERS MASONRY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA AGREEMENT JULY 1, 2010 WAGE INCREASE

QDP Certification Application for Plan Year 2019 Attachment C1 Current & Projected Enrollment

Special Single Shift $29.04 $ /1/2008 7/1/2009 7/1/2010 Wages plus Vac./Holiday/Dues Supp. $28.31 $29.31

The full Lost Dollars, Empty Plates report (including statewide data) is available at:

Catholic Charities of California Poverty Data by County within Diocese within California July 2013

Children s Dental Insurance Plan Rates 2014

California $ Monthly Rent Affordable to Selected Income Levels Compared with Two-Bedroom FMR

Superior Court of California, County of San Bernardino PUBLIC NOTICE

Capitol Association Plans PO Box , Sacramento, CA Phone: Fax:

November 21, Fadel Lawandy Director of the Hoag Center for Real Estate and Finance (714)

Lost Dollars, Empty Plates. The Impact of Food Stamp Participation on State and Local Economies

Under the Patient Protection and Affordable

These allocations are based on the best information available at this time.

CCIP Year-end Webinar

December 22, 2017 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Medicare Supplement Outline of Coverage

Family Dental Plans and Rates for 2015

Section 5. Trends in Public Health Insurance Programs

California Mental Health Services Authority FINANCE COMMITTEE TELECONFERENCE AGENDA

COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND WAGES IN CALIFORNIA - FOURTH QUARTER 2012

FIELD RESEARCH CORPORATION

Since 2014, California implemented multiple program changes and expansions, bringing millions of uninsured Californians into coverage, including:

Since 2008, California has experienced

OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY COMMERCIAL LINES MANUAL DIVISION FOUR FARM RULES

Health Policy Research Brief

Odyssey efileca Overview Santa Barbara Attorneys and Legal Professionals

Medicare Supplement Outline of Coverage

Utah 8:00 AM 12/21/ Wateridge Circle, Suite 250 San Diego, CA (877)

Blue Shield Medicare Supplement plan rates

PROGRAM EFFICIENCY 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 5 BR 6 BR

T J FINANCIAL PROGRAM MATRIX/GUIDELINE

FMG TRUCKING CLAIMS EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM

Medicare Supplement Outline of Coverage

Medicare Supplement Outline of Coverage. Plans A, F, Innovative F, G & N Anthem Blue Cross California 2018

Lost Dollars, Empty Plates

Annual Mental Health Services Act Revenue and Expenditure Report Fiscal Year ARER Instructions

California Foreclosure Starts Second-Lowest Since Early 2006

System Failure: California s Loophole- Ridden Commercial Property Tax May 2010

System Failure: California s Loophole- Ridden Commercial Property Tax May 2010

Danielle Johnson-Kutch, Deputy Chief Homeownership Preservation Office U.S. Treasury

GSFA PLATINUM DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE

2017 California Hospitals Workers Compensation Benchmarking Report

California Tax Credit Allocation Committee Low Income Housing Tax Credits. Lisa Vergolini Deputy Director

Health Policy Research Report

California Travel Impacts by County, p

County s Responses to Questions for RFP No. DHHS from Proposer #02

Blue Shield Medicare Supplement plan rate schedule

Blue Shield Medicare Supplement plan rate schedule

The Affordable Care Act The Bottom Line Facts

California Travel Impacts by County, p

CAPA IHSS Health Dental Benefit Information - December 8, 2015 Page 1 of 7

Odyssey efileca Overview Attorneys and Legal Professionals

REALIGNMENT - BACKGROUND

Current PCFD Code # Home Address City State Zip Code

2018 Health Benefit Summary. Manage Your Health Benefits Online

Geography of Child Poverty in California Technical Appendices

Danielle Johnson-Kutch, Deputy Chief Homeownership Preservation Office U.S. Treasury

Income Inequality and the Safety Net in California Technical Appendices

2017 Health Benefit Summary. Helping you make an informed choice about your health plan

General Prevailing Wage Determinations: Journeyman Determinations

Let Me Out.. Contingency Clauses and Collective Bargaining with In-Home Supportive Services Workers Introduction Background IHSS History

Hoover Institution Golden State Poll Fieldwork by YouGov April 14-28, List of Tables

2013 Outline of. Coverage. Individual Medicare Supplement plan. Janis E. Carter Health Net M51102 (CA 7/12)

For More Information

2016 IFP. Broker Cycle Guide. Effective: January 1, 2016

2015 Health Benefit Summary. Helping you make an informed choice about your health plan

California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission


BUSINESS FORECASTING CENTER. May California & Metro UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

Program Reference Guide

Cost Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual of the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Commission

HOMELESS EMERGENCY AID PROGRAM (HEAP)

CALIFORNIA UNIFORM PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION COST ACCOUNTING ACT

2016 California Small Business Owner Work and Save Survey (n=896, MoE +/-3.2%)

Health Insurance Companies for Making the Individual Market in California Affordable

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY STANDARD CONTRACT LANGUAGE: ALL CONTRACTS AND SUBCONTRACTS. A. The Civil Rights, HCD, and Age Discrimination Acts Assurances:

Department of Social Services:

COMMITMENT INTEGRITY LEADERSHIP. Workers Compensation Insurance. December The State Needs to Strengthen Its Efforts to Reduce Fraud

BUSINESS FORECASTING CENTER. January California & Metro UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

The Sonoma County Pension Crisis

California Plan guide

Enrollment in Health and Nutrition Safety Net Programs among California s Children

CENTER FOR BUSINESS AND POLICY RESEARCH. May California & Metro UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

Medi-Cal Enrollment Report Fiscal Year Comparison

Medicare facts and figures. A California Perspective

CENTER FOR BUSINESS AND POLICY RESEARCH. January California & Metro UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

Certified Enrollment Entity Application Worksheet

The California Poverty Measure

Transcription:

FORECLOSURE NOTICES SOAR, FORECLOSURE SALES DROP Government Intervention Continues to Play Havoc in Foreclosure Market Discovery Bay, CA, April 14, 2009 ForeclosureRadar (www.foreclosureradar.com), the only website that tracks every California foreclosure, and provides daily auction updates, issued its monthly California Foreclosure Report for March 2009. Notices of Default, the first step in the foreclosure process, reached a record level nearly 26 percent higher than the previous historic peak in April 2008. Notices of Trustee sale, which set the auction date and time, rose 82.3 percent from the prior month, though not yet reaching the prior record level set in July 2008. While foreclosure notices rose dramatically, sales at auction decreased 41.4 percent, to reach the lowest levels seen since the third quarter of 2007. While there is a lag between foreclosure filings and foreclosure sales, these dramatic differences are likely best explained by the unintended consequences of government intervention in the foreclosure process. High-level findings for March include: o Notices of Default increased 29.3 percent over February, to a record 54,268 filings, a 26.3 percent increase over March 2008 and a 25.8 percent increase from the peak level reached in April 2008. o Notices of Trustee Sale increased from February by 82.3 percent to 33,178 filings, a 19.6 percent increase from the prior year, but still 15 percent below the peak reached in July 2008. o March auction sales decreased 41.4 percent from February, to 10,040 properties sold at auction, representing $5.3 Billion in loan value. Year over year sales decreased by 36.6 percent. o The percentage of properties sold to third parties increased again in March to 10.7 percent of properties taken to auction, or 1,073 properties. While banks still take back the majority of foreclosures at trustee sale, third party bidding has continually increased since January 2008. o Lender discounts at auction increased substantially from February, reaching an average of 44.1 percent. The largest percentage discounts were seen in Monterey County with an average discount of 56.1 percent, while San Mateo County was among the lowest at 20.7 percent.

Not one government program aimed at addressing the foreclosure problem has dealt with the core issue of negative equity; and there can be no doubt these programs are having dramatic impacts on the foreclosure process, says Sean O Toole, founder and CEO of ForeclosureRadar. Unfortunately, the only tangible effect of these programs so far is a significant increase in uncertainty for homeowners, lenders, investors and even government officials trying to make sense of these wild swings in activity. Government programs currently impacting the foreclosure numbers in California: o California Senate Bill 1137, which requires lenders to contact homeowners before filing a Notice of Default. This bill resulted in a significant, but temporary, drop in foreclosure filings starting in September of 2008. While the bill failed to address the issue of negative equity that many Californians now face, it did likely create a backlog of foreclosure filings, which may partially explain the recent rise in filings. More significantly this law perfectly explains at least a portion of the decrease in sales, as the average time from the filing of a Notice of Default to foreclosure sale was 176 days in March, which aligns exactly with the September drop in Notice of Default filings. o The California Foreclosure Prevention Act, which goes into effect this summer, adds an additional 90 days to the foreclosure process if lenders fail to take certain actions. It is quite possible that the dramatic rise in foreclosure notices occurring now is an attempt by lenders to process as many foreclosures as possible before this law takes effect. o U.S. Congressional requests for foreclosure moratoriums many lenders instituted foreclosure moratoriums, at the request of Congress, to allow the incoming Administration time to put housing programs in place. Many of these moratoriums were in full force through March, although some are now being lifted notably Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac which both lifted their moratoriums effective March 31, 2008. o U.S. efforts to stabilize financial institutions, including TARP, PPIP and changes to mark-tomarket accounting practices, among others, may be leading some lenders to avoid completing foreclosures in the hopes of selling the troubled loans, to gain government guarantees for those loans or to continue avoiding losses by holding the assets on their books at higher values than they could get in today s real estate market. Combined, these programs have created significant turmoil in foreclosure filings and sales, as can be seen in the dramatic swings in foreclosure activity that began in September 2008. At this point, the only

thing that is clear is that there are still a large number of properties in default; and to date, there is little evidence that these programs will result in anything but delays. The core problem of negative equity remains unaddressed. ForeclosureRadar March Report by County: Change Population % Change % Change Rank in Rank County NOD NTS Sales Per Sale Feb 2009 Mar 2008 1 4 Yuba 172 134 56 1284-23% -16% 2-1 Merced 592 460 185 1380-44% -45% 3 16 San Benito 37 26 36 1605 13% -22% 4-2 Riverside 6838 3904 1276 1637-47% -30% 5-1 San Joaquin 1638 1146 409 1676-44% -54% 6-3 Stanislaus 1169 909 311 1691-45% -53% 7 8 Colusa 2 2 12 1826-14% -20% 8 2 Kern 1652 1215 444 1841-29% -24% 9 4 Calaveras 47 24 25 1845-17% -17% 10 1 Sacramento 2789 1910 716 1989-31% -48% 11-5 San Bernardino 5275 3464 989 2079-47% -23% 12 37 Plumas 11 12 10 2092 150% 0% 13 18 Amador 49 40 18 2108 38% 20%

14-7 Solano 878 604 199 2145-45% -49% 15-3 Imperial 304 236 80 2202-33% 3% 16-8 Madera 246 148 66 2286-48% -41% 17 11 Mariposa 1 1 8 2301 0% 167% 18-2 Contra Costa 1912 1343 405 2597-35% -53% 19 2 Lake 71 48 23 2785-36% -50% 20-2 Sutter 146 99 33 2905-39% -46% 21 22 Glenn 15 15 10 2920 25% 400% 22-8 Monterey 565 405 145 2956-47% -34% 23 10 Nevada 138 75 31 3200-3% 19% 24-4 Placer 609 395 104 3206-41% -34% 25-2 Fresno 1320 796 269 3461-35% -29% 26 4 Shasta 170 115 52 3505-21% -17% 27-3 Yolo 242 135 56 3555-34% -38% 28-3 Tulare 573 368 122 3568-33% -36% 29-7 El Dorado 321 163 47 3824-47% -8% 30 2 Sonoma 499 337 113 4287-31% -47% 31 19 Kings 136 84 35 4412 25% -8% 32-15 Mono 1 4 3 4586-67% 0% 33 5 Alameda 1912 1077 328 4704-23% -44% 34-7 Tuolumne 83 33 12 4733-45% -29% 35-9 San Diego 3892 2499 662 4753-48% -41% 36 4 Napa 169 101 25 5468-31% -52% 37 0 Butte 96 60 40 5510-38% -2% 38-3 Ventura 1032 579 143 5815-44% -38% 39 2 Santa Barbara 391 202 71 5938-33% -31% 40-1 Los Angeles 12318 6789 1599 6481-43% -32% 41 3 San Luis Obispo 278 127 41 6569-36% -9% 42 4 Santa Cruz 202 117 40 6663-35% -23% 43 10 Trinity 8 3 2 6983 0% -50% 44 3 Santa Clara 1556 780 247 7438-41% -28% 45-3 Orange 2591 1578 376 8301-50% -39% 46-17 Tehama 1 0 7 8917-74% -75% 47 7 Lassen 10 3 4 8939-56% 0% 48 7 Inyo 1 0 2 9076 0% 100% 49-1 Siskiyou 42 22 5 9194-50% 150% 50 2 San Mateo 720 317 79 9360-31% -13% 51 6 Del Norte 2 4 3 9806 50% 0% 52-1 Marin 142 82 26 9900-37% 8% 53 3 Humboldt 51 32 9 14758-25% 0% 54-9 Mendocino 67 42 6 15027-71% 50% 55 3 San Francisco 281 114 25 32981-31% -49% 56-22 Modoc 3 0 0-100% -100% 57-21 Sierra 1 0 0-100% -100% 58-49 Alpine 1 0 0-100% -100% Sign up to receive the California Foreclosure Report

CALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE REPORT METHODOLOGY Rankings are based on population per foreclosure sale. NOD indicates the number of Notices of Default that were filed at the county, and NTS indicates filed Notices of Trustee Sale. Sales indicates the number of properties sold at foreclosure auction. Percentage changes are based on monthly Sales. The data presented by ForeclosureRadar is based on county records and individual sales results from daily foreclosure auctions throughout the state not estimates or projections. ABOUT FORECLOSURERADAR.COM ForeclosureRadar is the only web site that tracks every foreclosure in California with daily updates on all foreclosure auctions. ForeclosureRadar features unprecedented tools to search, manage, track and analyze preforeclosure, foreclosure auction, short sale and bank owned real estate. The web site was launched in May 2007 by Sean O Toole, who spent 15 years building and launching software companies before entering the foreclosure business in 2002 where he successfully bought and sold more than 150 foreclosure properties. ForeclosureRadar is an indispensable resource for real estate agents, brokers, investors, lenders, mortgage brokers, attorneys and other real estate professionals specializing in the California real estate market. ###