New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Similar documents
Raising the New Mexico Minimum Wage

Citizen s Guide to New Mexico s Tax System

Citizen s Guide to the New Mexico State Budget

Fiscal Policy Project

Expanding New Mexico s Working Families Tax Credit Would Generate Economic Activity and Help Hard-Working Families

Economic Recovery. Lessons Learned From Previous Recessions. Timothy S. Parker Alexander W. Marré

Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009

20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph Ohio Education Policy Institute August 2018

LANE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J (EUGENE PUBLIC SCHOOLS) LONG-TERM FINANCIAL FORECAST. January 2015

No Jobs Recovery? The Connecticut Economic Outlook: August 2009

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 2013

Centennial School District Budget Message April 19, CENTENNIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 2017/2018 BUDGET MESSAGE April 19, 2017

October Persistent Gaps: State Child Care Assistance Policies Karen Schulman and Helen Blank

Food poverty in London: A submission from Child Poverty Action Group

City of Modesto Economic Indicators December 2014 Edition

A Health Impact Assessment of a Food Tax in New Mexico

Poverty Rises, Median Income Falls and More Minnesotans Go Without Health Insurance in 2010

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION IN SCOTLAND 2015

Who Pays? The Unfairness of Connecticut s State and Local Tax System

HUMBOLDT COUNTY: FINANCIAL TRENDS AND INDICATORS

Notes Numbers in the text and tables may not add up to totals because of rounding. Unless otherwise indicated, years referred to in describing the bud

Health Insurance Coverage in 2013: Gains in Public Coverage Continue to Offset Loss of Private Insurance

Local Government Snapshot

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE CBO. The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022

2003 Tax and Budget Review. In 2003 legislative sessions, 18 states made significant tax increases totaling almost $6.2 billion for fiscal year 2004.

Just What the Doctor Ordered How Medicaid Stimulus Funding is Helping Iowa s Economic Recovery

SPECIAL REPORT. TD Economics CONDITIONS ARE RIPE FOR AMERICAN CONSUMERS TO LEAD ECONOMIC GROWTH

Economic Outlook, January 2016 Jeffrey M. Lacker President, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond

A Briefing on Georgia s Budget FY14-FY15. Dr. Carolyn Bourdeaux Andrew Young School of Policy Studies at Georgia State University

Demystifying the Chapter 70 Formula: How the Massachusetts Education Funding System Works

CEPR CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH

Asda Income Tracker. Report: December 2015 Released: January Centre for Economics and Business Research ltd

by Jeanie Donovan labudget.org

THE COLORADO WAY. How Your Vote Can Create Widespread Economic Prosperity

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Business Commons

Health Insurance Data

A DECADE OF WELFARE REFORM: FACTS AND FIGURES

State Budget Update: Summer 2011

Florida: An Economic Overview

Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

SPECIAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ELECTION TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2012

Fiscal Policy Project

Poverty in Our Time. The Challenges and Opportunities of Fighting Poverty in Virginia. Executive Summary. By Michael Cassidy and Sara Okos

THE RESOURCES BOOM AND MACROECONOMIC POLICY IN AUSTRALIA

chapter: Income and Expenditure

TRENDS IN FSP PARTICIPATION RATES: FOCUS ON SEPTEMBER 1997

Survey of Emerging Market Conditions

Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment and Beyond

The State of Working Utah, Looking Back on the Boom

STATE INCOME TAX BURDENS ON LOW-INCOME FAMILIES IN By Bob Zahradnik and Joseph Llobrera 1

Savannah :: Chatham. August rd Edition COMMUNITY INDICATORS DATABASE COUNTY CHATHAM. produced by the Armstrong Public Service Center

The State of Working New York 2011: Smaller Incomes, Fewer Opportunities, More Hardship

Colorado s Uninsured Children

Briefing Paper. Business Week Restates the Nineties. By Dean Baker. April 22, 2002

Fiscal Policy Project

The Impact of the Recession on Employment-Based Health Coverage

Alaska s Oil Production Tax: Comparing the Old and the New By Scott Goldsmith Web Note No. 17 May 2014

The Purple Book D B P E N S I O N S U N I V E R S E R I S K P R O F I L E

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per re

The Real Estate Report Volume 41, Number 2 Fall 2017 GENERAL SUMMARY

Internal Review of Organizational Efficiency Presented March 9, 2016 Revised March 11, 2016

The Cost of Ownership of New Mexico s Public School Facilities

Trends in the finances of UK higher education libraries:

Section One: K-5 ENROLLMENTS. Actual and Projected K-5 Enrollments

An Analysis of the Impact of Penalty Rate Cuts on National Growth Trends. December 2017

ABOUT THE URBAN INSTITUTE

North Carolina s Uninsured Children

The 2008 Statistics on Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage by Gary Burtless THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION

Perspectives JAN Market Preview: U.S. Economy

Submission to Ontario s Minimum Wage Advisory Panel

AUGUST 2012 An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022 Provided as a convenience, this screen-friendly version is identic

Historical Effective Tax Rates, Preliminary Edition

Economic Recovery Will Be Tied to Changes in Washington State s Revenue System

EMPIRE CENTER RESEARCH & DATA. P.O. Box 7113, Albany, New York PH: www. empirecenter.

Socio-economic Series Changes in Household Net Worth in Canada:

STATE BUDGET TROUBLES WORSEN By Elizabeth McNichol and Iris J. Lav

Infrastructure Spending Trends

General Fund Revenue Update State of North Carolina

States Tax Portfolios Drive Differences in Revenue Volatility What different tax types mean for fiscal stability

Labour. Overview Latin America and the Caribbean EXECUT I V E S U M M A R Y

Savings Patterns and Asset Accumulation in New Mexico s Prosperity Kids Children s Savings Account (CSA) Program: 2017 Update

Don t Raise the Federal Debt Ceiling, Torpedo the U.S. Housing Market

THE TAX ADEQUACY PROBLEM IN THE NEW ENGLAND STATES: WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT?

STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

Consumer Debt and Money Report Q making business sense

Revising the State Fiscal Plan to Account for Petroleum Wealth by Scott Goldsmith Web Note No. 9 May 2011

Mandatory Spending Since 1962

Health Policy Research Brief

REPORT #02-04 O L A OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR STATE OF MINNESOTA PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT. Financing Unemployment Insurance

State Budgets in 2015 and 2016: Most States Show Continued Growth, Some Face Significant Challenges

OBSERVATION. TD Economics EUROPE S LOST GENERATION

A Historical Perspective of State Aid, Tuition and Spending for State Universities in Kansas

MONITORING POVERTY AND SOCIAL EXCLUSION 2015

Research Brief on America s Cities

UNDER ATTACK TEXAS' MIDDLE CL ASS AND THE OPPORTUNITY CRISIS

COMMENTARY NUMBER 776 November Durable Goods Orders, New-Home Sales December 23, 2015

Revised November 16, 2007

2000s, a trend. rates and with. workforce participation as. followed. 2015, 50 th

BGR Outlook on Orleans

Financing Education In Minnesota A Publication of the Minnesota House of Representatives Fiscal Analysis Department

Transcription:

Fiscal Policy Project New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond by Gerry Bradley, MA August 2016 The constitution of New Mexico provides for a system of free public schools in Section 1 of Article 12 - Education: Free Public Schools A uniform system of free public schools sufficient for the education of, and open to, all the children of school age in the state shall be established and maintained. The New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty, a nonprofit law firm, and the Rosebrough Law Firm, in Gallup, NM, are representing New Mexican parents and students in a legal challenge to the sufficiency and equity of the funding of the New Mexico public education system. The lawsuit asserts that state government has failed to provide a uniform system of school funding sufficient for the education of all the children of school age in the state, as required by the New Mexico constitution. This failure is evident, the suit shows, in the poor academic performance across racial, ethnic, and socio-economic classifications. This report supports the arguments made by the lawsuit. 1 The lawsuit demonstrates that the poor and disparate educational performance of New Mexico s children is connected to a lack of resources provided to schools. Schools are not given the resources that they need, as they are in states with better student outcomes, to help children succeed. Numerous educational experts and legislative task forces and committees, as well as studies, have drawn attention to the insufficiency of funding for public education in New Mexico. A 2008 report by the American Institutes of Research (AIR) 2 found that operational expenditures were underfunded statewide by about $350 million, or nearly 15 percent, at that time. Since then, the budget for public education remained below the 2009 level for four years before recovering to the 2009 level in fiscal year 2015 (FY15). Despite this increase, funding still had not recovered to 2008 levels on a per-student, inflation-adjusted basis. Since the FY17 appropriation was $2.648, the base budget would need to increase by $400 million to reach the 15 percent increase recommended in the AIR report. Also, a recent report from the state Legislature found that New Mexico and Mississippi direct less funding to serving at-risk students than do all other states, despite the large numbers of at-risk students in these two states. Notably, both New Mexico and Mississippi consistently rank at the bottom in assessments of student outcomes. New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 1

Public School Appropriations and the State Equalization Guarantee Like school systems in almost all of the 50 states, New Mexico public school revenue fell sharply during the Great Recession that started in December 2007. New Mexico policy-makers addressed the revenue crisis by slashing state spending on public schools and temporarily plugging the gap with federal revenues from the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The availability of federal ARRA funds in the 2010 and 2011 school years helped mitigate the state cuts to the school system. The purpose of this report is to fill in that broad brush story and bring the story up to date with a discussion of revenues from the 2007-08 school year (SY 07-08) up to budgeted appropriations for SY 16-17. Figure I (below) provides a history of the New Mexico Legislature s appropriations for public school by fund source (state general fund, other state fund source, and federal) from FY08 forward. Most years, the number of students enrolled in public education grows and inflation chips away at the value of educational expenditures. Given the past eight years of experience, the number of students can be expected to grow by about 0.34 percent per year. A forecast of the Consumer Price Index by the state of New Mexico s Consensus Revenue Estimating Group shows an inflation increase of 2.9 percent in FY17, 2.5 percent in FY18, 2.3 percent in FY19, and 2.4 percent in FY20. A recent report from the state Legislature found that New Mexico and Mississippi direct less funding to serving at-risk students than do all other states, despite the large numbers of at-risk students in these two states. Figure I Public Education Appropriations (FY08 to FY17; in millions) $3,500 $3,000 Dollars in Millions $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $500 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 Federal $484.3 $438.4 $627.1 $536.2 $420.5 $414.2 $414.2 $414.2 $414.2 $414.2 Other State.75.75.85.85.85.90 $1.50 $2.18 $5.70 $5.70 State $2,430.7 $2,551.0 $2,230.4 $2,309.2 $2,338.4 $2,402.8 $2,498.7 $2,608.4 $2,639.1 $2,648.0 Total $2,915.8 $2,990.0 $2,953.8 $2,936.7 $2,786.3 $2,817.8 $2,914.4 $3,024.8 $3,059.0 $3,067.9 Source: Post Session Review, Legislative Finance Committee, various editions 2 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Figure II (below), shows the percent change in the general fund operating budget for public schools since FY04. Given that the public school appropriation from the state general fund was $2.648 billion in FY17, general fund appropriations for the next three years would need to grow by $74 million (2.84 percent) in FY18, $72 million (2.64 percent) in FY19 and $76 million (2.74 percent) in FY20 merely to keep pace with inflation and growth in the number of students, given expected increases in enrollment and prices. Public school finance in New Mexico is quite centralized: most funding comes from state-level sources rather than local sources, as would be the case in a state that relied heavily on the property tax. Figure III (below) shows that the operating budget for the state s public school system dropped sharply during the recession and has gradually recovered since then. Figure II Year-to-Year Percent Change in Public Education Operating Budget (FY04 to FY17) 9% 6% 3% 0% -3% -6% -9% -12% -15% FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 Source: Post Session Review, Legislative Finance Committee, various editions Figure III Public Education Operating Budgets (FY08 to FY17; in millions) $3,000 Dollars in Millions $2,750 $2,500 $2,250 $2,000 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 FY 17 $2,915.8 $2,990.0 $2,953.8 $2,936.7 $2,786.3 $2,817.8 $2,914.4 $3,024.8 $3,059.0 $3,067.9 Source: Post Session Review, Legislative Finance Committee, various editions New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 3

The State Equalization Guarantee (SEG) is the formula that New Mexico uses to distribute funds to the state s 88 school districts. The SEG is driven mainly by school average daily membership or student counts. Total appropriations for the public schools are divided by the number of projected units to derive the SEG unit value. The SEG makes it possible for there to be some local control over how funds are spent even though the funding system is centralized. The blue line in Figure IV (below) shows that the SEG increased smoothly for almost three decades from 1983 to 2008 before dropping at the onset of the current recession, from which New Mexico is still struggling to recover. The last three fiscal years show a slight increase, but that is before adjusting for inflation. The orange line in Figure IV provides a picture of the value of the SEG adjusted for inflation. The SEG peaked at an inflation-adjusted $4,256 (in 2014 dollars) per unit in SY 08-09 just as the current recession started to crush revenues. Figure IV Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted State Equalization Guarantee (SY 1984-85 to SY 2014-15) $5,000 $4,500 $4,000 $3,500 $3,000 $2.500 $2,000 $1,500 Nominal Inflation adjusted SY 84-85 SY 86-87 SY 88-89 SY 90-91 SY 92-93 SY 94-95 SY 96-97 SY 98-99 SY 00-01 SY 02-03 SY 04-05 SY 06-07 SY 08-09 SY 10-11 SY 12-13 SY 14-15 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) Figure V Public School Student Population by School Year (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) 340,000 Student Membership 330,000 320,000 310,000 323,760 322,679 324,104 327,561 330,414 331,365 330,857 331,363 Source: New Mexico Public Education Department 4 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Over the time that the real value of the SEG was falling and then flat lined, student enrollment in the state s public schools was still trending slowly upward at an average rate of about 0.34 percent (see Figure V, page 4). The state s public schools were expected to do more with less. Revenues for Public Schools Operational Revenues Broadly speaking, there are four uses of revenues in the Public Education Department accounting system: operational, special projects, capital outlay, and debt service. Each of the uses relies on revenues from different sources. Revenues going to each of the four classifications fluctuated in different ways during the past eight years. For the first and largest classification revenues to pay for operational expenses total revenues rose from $2.56 billion in SY 07-08 to $2.637 billion in SY 08-09 (see Figure VI, below). The recession then took its toll on New Mexico revenues in SY 09-10 and operational revenues dropped to $2.376 billion in that year. Operational revenues began a slow recovery in SY 10-11 ($2.445 billion) and SY 11-12 ($2.475 billion), reaching $2.752 billion in SY 14-15. Figure VI also pictures per-pupil (membership) operational revenues on both a nominal and inflationadjusted basis. By this measure, per-pupil operational revenues fell from $7,907 in SY 07-08 to a low point of $6,923 in SY 11-12. The inflation-adjusted per-pupil revenue then began a slow climb back to $7,319 in SY 14-15. Inflation-adjusted per-pupil estimate for SY 14-15 is still 7.4 percent lower than SY 07-08 level. Clearly, operational revenues have not been keeping up with inflation and student increases since the recession. Figure VI Operational Revenues, Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) Total Revenues (in billions) $3.00 $2.50 $2.00 $1.50 $1.00 $.50 Total Revenues (in billions) Nominal $2.560 $2.637 $2.376 $2.445 $2.475 $2.544 $2.611 $2.752 Inflation-Adjusted $2.560 $2.540 $2.297 $2.328 $2.287 $2.306 $2.333 $2.425 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 Nominal Inflation adjusted $6,000 Nominal $7,907 $8,172 $7,331 $7,464 $7,491 $7,677 $7,892 $8,308 Inflation-Adjusted $7,907 $7,873 $7,090 $7,109 $6,923 $6,959 $7,053 $7,319 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 5

Special Projects Title I and Other The next category is revenues for special projects, which includes a wide array of programs, from school lunches to Title I funds for schools in high-poverty neighborhoods. Federal funding accounts for a significant share of revenues for special projects. The impact of the federal stimulus is especially clear in this category. This is because much of the ARRA revenues arrived to shore up Title I spending, support for schools in high-poverty areas. Figure VII (below) shows that federal ARRA funding helped boost special projects revenues in SY 08-09 and SY 09-10. Funding for special projects had fallen back to $510 million in SY 11-12 after reaching $775 million in SY 09-10 and $691 million in SY 10-11. The intent of the federal stimulus was to prevent school funding from dropping sharply due to the recession, especially for schools in high-poverty areas. In New Mexico, funding for special projects went up by $275 million or almost 55 percent between SY 07-08 ($499.7 million) and SY 09-10 ($775.3 million). The increase in revenues for special projects helped to offset the drop in operational revenues. Figure VII also shows per-pupil special projects revenues on both a nominal and inflationadjusted basis. Figure VII Special Projects Revenues, Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) $800 Total Revenues (in millions) Total Revenues (in millions) $600 $400 $200 Nominal $499.7 $562.1 $775.3 $691.4 $510.3 $542.5 $516.4 $567.9 Inflation-Adjusted $499.7 $541.5 $749.8 $658.4 $471.6 $491.8 $461.4 $500.4 Nominal Inflation adjusted $2,500 $2,000 $15,00 Nominal $1,543 $1,742 $2,392 $2,111 $1,544 $1,637 $1,561 $1,714 Inflation-Adjusted $1,543 $1,678 $2,313 $2,010 $1,427 $1,484 $1,395 $1,510 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) 6 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Operational and Special Projects Combined By combining operational and special projects revenues we get a more focused picture of the resources available to school districts. Taking operational and special projects funding together, combined revenues rose from $3.059 billion in SY 07-08 to $3.199 billion in SY 08-09 (see Figure VIII, below). Operational funding and special projects funding combined had fallen to pre-recession levels by SY 10-11 ($3.136 billion) and fell further in SY 11-12 ($2.895 billion). The figure was $3.086 billion in SY 12-13. Combined revenues for operational and special projects purposes had finally recovered past the SY 09-10 level in SY 13-14 ($3.127 billion) and SY14-15 ($3.321 billion). Figure VIII-B (below) shows per-pupil operational plus special projects revenues on both a nominal and inflation-adjusted basis. On an inflation-adjusted, perpupil basis, combined operational and special projects revenues reached their peak of $9,551 in SY 08-09, fell to their lowest point in SY 11-12 ($8,350), and recovered to $8,528 in SY 14-15. By SY 14-15, then, inflationadjusted, per-pupil revenues for operational and special projects spending had fallen by nearly 10 percent from their peak of seven years earlier in SY 08-09. Figure VIII Operational and Special Projects Revenues Combined, Nominal and Inflation- Adjusted (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) Total Revenues (in billions) $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $.5 Total Revenues (in billions) Nominal $3.059 $3.199 $3.151 $3.136 $2.895 $3.086 $3.127 $3.320 Inflation-Adjusted $3.059 $3.082 $3.047 $2.987 $2.759 $2.789 $2.798 $2.825 $12,000 $11,000 $10,000 $9,000 Nominal Inflation adjusted $8,000 Nominal $9,451 $9,914 $9,723 $9,575 $8,763 $9,315 $9,453 $10,021 Inflation-Adjusted $9,451 $9,551 $9,403 $9,119 $8,350 $8,418 $8,458 $8,528 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 7

Capital Outlay The remaining two revenue categories are related to capital outlay the upkeep and construction of school buildings, which are crucial to the learning process. There was no apparent pattern to revenues for capital projects in the early years, as SY 08-09 and SY 10-11 both saw peaks. However, SY 14-15 saw a large decrease in revenues for capital outlay purposes from $628 million in SY 13-14 to $583 million in SY 14-15 for a 7.2 percent decrease. Figure IX (below) shows that capital outlay on a per-pupil, inflation-adjusted basis in SY 14-15 ($1,551) was below SY 08-09 ($2,521). Figure IX Capital Projects Revenues, Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) Total Revenues (in millions) $800 Total Revenues (in millions) $600 $400 $200 Nominal $599.0 $844.4 $552.5 $711.9 $458.7 $470.1 $628.4 $583.4 Inflation-Adjusted $599.0 $813.4 $534.3 $678.0 $423.9 $426.2 $561.5 $514.1 Nominal Inflation adjusted $3,500 $3,000 $2,500 $2,000 $1,500 Nominal $1,850 $2,617 $1,705 $2,173 $1,388 $1,419 $1,899 $1,761 Inflation-Adjusted $1,850 $2,521 $1,649 $2,070 $1,283 $1,286 $1,517 $1,551 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) 8 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Debt Service Debt service, revenues for payments on borrowing for capital projects, rose gradually from $238.5 million in SY 07-08 to $302.7 million in SY 11-12. Figure X (below) shows that debt service revenues on a nominal basis rose to $311.7 million in SY 14-15. Inflation-adjusted, per-pupil revenues available for debt service spending rose to $829 in SY 14-15 from $789 in SY 13-14. Figure X Debt Service Revenues, Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) Total Revenues (in millions) $350 $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 Total Revenues (in mllions) Nominal $238.5 $245.1 $257.4 $294.4 $302.7 $270.7 $292.0 $311.7 Inflation-Adjusted $238.5 $236.1 $248.9 $280.2 $279.8 $245.4 $260.9 $274.6 Nominal Inflation adjusted $800 $600 Nominal $737 $760 $794 $899 $916 $817 $883 $941 Inflation-Adjusted $737 $732 $768 $855 $847 $741 $789 $829 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 9

Total Revenues Figure XI (below) provides a picture of total revenues on both a nominal and inflation-adjusted basis. Total revenues experienced peaks in SY 08-09 ($4.288 billion) and SY 10-11 ($4.142 billion). Total revenues were $4.047 billion in SY 13-14 before increasing 4.1 percent to $4.215 billion in SY 14-15. The increase in SY 14-15 was from operational, special projects and debt service revenues. Capital outlay fell in SY 14-15. The total revenue picture is more informative after looking at a recap of revenues by spending type: operational, special projects, capital outlay and debt service, as shown in Figure XII (page 11). Taken together, revenues peaked in SY 08-09, fell in SY 09-10, then rose to $4.142 billion in SY 10-11, and increased slowly to $4.215 billion SY 14-15. Capital outlay and debt service revenues rose in a jagged pattern, while operational revenues collapsed in SY 09-10 and special projects revenues rose to compensate. Again, the increase in special projects revenues in the earlier years was largely due to the infusion of federal ARRA funds in the Title I program. The final summary graph (Figure XIII, page 11) shows public school revenues from a different perspective: that of sources of total revenues by level of government. This perspective clarifies further the role of federal ARRA funds in stabilizing revenue for the New Mexico public school system. (The latest year available for revenues by level of government is SY 14-15.) Figure XI Total K-12 Revenues, Nominal and Inflation-Adjusted (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15) $5 Total Revenues (in billions) Total Revenues (in billions) $4 $3 $2 $1 Nominal $3.897 $4.288 $3.961 $4.142 $3.746 $3.827 $4.047 $4.215 Inflation-Adjusted $3.897 $4.131 $3.830 $3.945 $3.462 $3.469 $3.617 $3.714 $15,000 $10,500 $10,000 $5,500 Nominal Inflation adjusted $5,000 Nominal $12,037 $13,291 $12,222 $12,647 $11,339 $11,550 $12,235 $12,723 Inflation-Adjusted $12,037 $12,804 $11,820 $12,044 $10,480 $10,470 $10,933 $11,210 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) 10 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Figure XII Public Education Revenue by Spending Category (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15; in millions) $5,000 Dollars in Millions $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 Debt Service $238.5 $245.1 $257.3 $294.2 $302.9 $270.7 $292.0 $311.7 Capital Outlay $599.0 $844.4 $552.5 $711.9 $458.7 $470.1 $628.0 $583.4 Special Projects $499.7 $562.1 $775.3 $691.4 $510.3 $542.5 $516.0 $567.9 Operational $2,560.0 $2,638.0 $2,376.0 $2,445.0 $2,475.0 $2,544.6 $2,611.0 $2,752.8 Source: NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. (inflation calculations by NM Voices for Children based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers produced by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics) Figure XIII Public Education Revenue by Fund Source (SY 07-08 to SY 14-15; in millions) $5,000 $4,000 Dollars in Millions $3,000 $2,000 Other Financing $333.2 $567.4 $304.9 $466.3 $224.9 $224.2 $369.0 $321.3 Federal $472.6 $545.4 $764.6 $696.5 $512.5 $537.2 $481.6 $528.0 State $2,550.0 $2,633.0 $2,339.0 $2,413.0 $2,417.0 $2,500.0 $2,602.4 $2,725.7 Local $541.2 $543.7 $552.3 $566.3 $581.8 $566.6 $595.1 $627.0 Source: Post Session Review, Legislative Finance Committee, various editions New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 11

Below-the-Line Funding An issue that has come to the fore in the school funding discussion in the past five years is that of the amount of school funding provided through the School Equalization Guarantee (SEG) and the amount appropriated apart from the SEG, which is referred to as below-the-line funding. The fact that an increasing amount of funding does not go through the SEG may be seen as a problem for local school districts, because non-seg funding is earmarked for specific purposes and cannot be used for the priorities of the local school districts. Arguably, local school districts are closest to their local problems and may be better able to respond to local issues. Figures XIV and XV (below) show the changes in SEG and belowthe-line funding levels over recent years. As shown in Figure XIV (below), the SEG unit value has risen from $3,871.79 in FY 09 to $4,027.75 in FY16. This represents an increase of $156 or 4.03 percent over that time period. Figure XIV State Equalization Guarantee (SEG) Unit Value (FY09 to FY16) $4,200 $3,975 Dollars $3,750 $3,525 $3,300 Figure XV Below-the-Line (non-seg) Appropriations (FY09 to FY16; in millions) $120 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 $3,871.79 $3,792.65 $3,712.17 $3,598.87 $3,673.54 $3,817.55 $4,007.75 $4,027.75 Source: School Budget and Finance Analysis Bureau Stat Book New Mexico Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public School Finance Statistics, NM Public Education Dept. $100 Dollars in Millions $80 $60 $40 $20 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 $39.60 $30.20 $16.10 $17.10 $41.80 $57.00 $95.10 $101.00 Sources: Post-Session Review, Legislative Finance Committee, various years; additional calculations by NM Voices for Children 12 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond

Below the line or non-seg appropriations have increased from $39.6 million in FY09 to $101 million in FY16 (see Figure XV, page 12). The disproportionate increase in non-seg funding poses challenges to local school districts. In addition, the increase in non-seg funding represents movement away from the principles of state s system for funding public schools, which is intended to provide equality of opportunity irrespective of the relative wealth of individual school districts, has been in place since the early 1970s, and has served the state well. Conclusion The Great Recession inflicted a serious blow to New Mexico funding for public education. It has taken eight years to emerge from the havoc created by that economic earthquake. Total revenues on a nominal basis have been rising since SY 11-12 (shown in Figure XI, page 10). The best measure of classroom revenue is the combination of revenues for operations and special projects. Per-pupil inflation-adjusted revenues for operations and special projects reached $8,528 in SY 14-15, still below the peak reached in SY 08-09 ($9,551). Each year, the number of students enrolled in public education grows and inflation chips away at the value of educational expenditures. As noted above, in order to keep pace with student growth and inflation, general fund appropriations for the next three years would need to grow by $56 million (3.28 percent) in SY 16-17, $101 million (3.68 percent) in SY 17-18 and $98 million (3.48 percent) in SY 18-19 to merely keep pace with inflation and growth in the number of students. The lawsuit filed by the New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty has described the problems facing the state s public education funding system in detail. This report maps out the recent history of public school funding and the continued erosion of the resources going to the school system. Following the recommendations of the 2008 American Institute for Research study to increase public school funding by at least 15 percent would be a way to begin solving the funding problem faced by the New Mexico public school system. This would add about $400 million to the FY17 appropriation of $2.648 billion. This increase would establish a new base of $3.048 billion from which to build in future years. Endnotes 1. Complaint: Lawsuit Filed Challenging Sufficiency of State Education, New Mexico Center on Law and Poverty, July 2015, http://nmpovertylaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/complaint- Yazzie-Second-Amended-Complaint-2015-07-14.pdf 2. An Independent Comprehensive Study of the New Mexico Public School Funding Formula Final Report, American Institutes for Research, January 2008 The disproportionate increase in non-seg funding poses challenges to local school districts. New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond 13

Follow us online www.nmvoices.org The Fiscal Policy Project, a program of New Mexico Voices for Children, is made possible by grants from the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the McCune Charitable Foundation, and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. This report is available for download and use with proper citation at www.nmvoices.org New Mexico Voices for Children James Jimenez, MPA, Executive Director James Aranda, Healthy Places for New Mexico Team Coordinator Gerry Bradley, MA, Senior Researcher and Policy Analyst Stephanie Brinker, Ph.D., Volunteer Armelle Casau, Ph.D., Policy and Research Analyst Cathy Cavin, Fund Development Support Matthew Cross-Guillen, Healthy Places for New Mexico Community Outreach and Education Coordinator Martha Files, Operational Support Bill Jordan, MA, Senior Policy Advisor and Government Relations Officer Sharon Kayne, Communications Director Raphael Pacheco, State Priorities Partnership Fellow Brian Urban, Operations Manager Amber Wallin, MPA, KIDS COUNT Director Joseph M. West, Special Projects and Fund Development Specialist 625 Silver Ave, SW, Suite 195 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 505.244.9505 www.nmvoices.org NM Voices for Children is a proud member of the following networks: 14 New Mexico Public School Funding through the Great Recession and Beyond