Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool MODULE 11: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

Similar documents
TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION LETTER. ID/No: Regulatory Integrity Date: August 17, 2009

Audit manual - general part

The TADAT Framework:

PROGRAM-FOR-RESULTS FINANCING INTERIM GUIDANCE NOTE TO STAFF: FIDUCIARY SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT. Operations Policy and Country Services

Overview of the Budget Cycle. Karen Rono Development Initiatives

Compliance Audit Guidelines. General Introduction I N T O S A I ISSAI 4000

Practice Note 10: Audit of financial statements of public sector bodies in the United Kingdom

Oversight Committee Mandate: Audit and Finance Committee

CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT BANK STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRITY, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY PILLARS I AND II INTEGRITY AND ETHICS POLICY

Statement of Recommended Practice. Practice Note 10: Audit of financial statements of public sector bodies in the United Kingdom

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool. Module 7: TIMELY PAYMENT OF TAXES

Establishing an Anti-Corruption Compliance Program in Canada

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool. Module 3: INTEGRITY OF THE REGISTERED TAXPAYER BASE

WHISTLE BLOWER/ VIGIL MECHANISM POLICY. Definitions of some of the key terms used in this mechanism are given below:

Legislative Oversight: The Role of Program Evaluation. October 2008 Workshop for Nigerian National Assembly Committee Staff

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERNAL CONTROL USING THE THREE LINES OF DEFENSE MODEL IN CONTROLLING CORRUPTION IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF INDONESIA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN ONTARIO PLACE CORPORATION AND THE MINISTER OF TOURISM

STRATEGY OF PUBLIC INTERNAL FINANCIAL CONTROL DEVELOPMENT IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR THE PERIOD OF

WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY

INSPECTORATE OF GOVERNMENT POLICY STATEMENT PRESENTATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY AND LEGAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENT

Existing Score. Proposed Score

WIPO General Assembly

Natural Resource Funds. Texas. Austin. Texas. Permanent University Fund

Revenue Scotland Framework Document. Agreement between the Scottish Ministers and Revenue Scotland

Draft Policy Brief: Revised Indicator 9a for the Global Partnership Monitoring Framework

Performance Audits of Proposition 39 Bonds

PROCUREMENT IN WORLD BANK INVESTMENT PROJECT FINANCE PROCUREMENT POLICY (DRAFT)

The Australian National University Fraud Control Framework. Corporate Governance & Risk Office

INCLUSIVE HOUSING FINANCE PROGRAM

Audit and Financial Risk Committee Charter

Auditor-General s Auditing Standards 2017

PERBAIKAN BISNIS KESEHATAN: PERSPEKTIF MASYARAKAT SIPIL. Natalia Soebagjo Board Member, Transparency International

DYCOM INDUSTRIES, INC. CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

UNSW GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES

PART I - DEFINITIONS & PRINCIPLES. Date 11 May 2015

Strengthening Stakeholder Participation

FRASER & NEAVE HOLDINGS BHD

Additional reporting and disclosures

NN Group. Whistleblower. Policy. Version 2.3 Date September 2015 Department. Corporate Compliance

Preface. ISSAI 4000: A general introduction to guidelines on compliance audit presenting an overall view on compliance audit

THEMATIC COMPILATION OF RELEVANT INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY RWANDA ARTICLE 9, PARAGRAPHS 2 AND 3 UNCAC MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC FINANCES

Title: Anti-Bribery Policy

REPORT 2014/051 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION. Audit of the process of reporting cases of fraud or presumptive fraud in financial statements

Region 10 PIHP FY Corporate Compliance Program Plan

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA POLICY ON REPORTING AND INVESTIGATING ALLEGATIONS OF SUSPECTED IMPROPER GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES (WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY)

1. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT AND MECHANISMS TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE (ARTICLE III, PARAGRAPHS 1 AND 2 OF THE CONVENTION)

Executive Board Annual Session Rome, May 2015 POLICY ISSUES ENTERPRISE RISK For approval MANAGEMENT POLICY WFP/EB.A/2015/5-B

ANTI-BRIBERY AND ANTI-CORRUPTION POLICY

Office of the City Auditor 2018 Annual Work Plan and Long Term Audit Plan

Anti-Bribery Policy. The Company Compliance Officer is the Director of Organisational Effectiveness.

AUDIT DEPARTMENT SUPREME AUDIT INSTITUTION OF GRENADA

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ( MOU ) dated as of, BETWEEN:

4/7/2015. Group. Governance and Legislation

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA

White Paper Conducting Fraud and Corruption Investigations

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF PARLIAMENT BILL

Anti-Fraud and Corruption Policy

SOMERVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY ANTI- FRAUD POLICY. April 3, 2013

QUESTIONNAIRE ON FISCAL INSTITUTIONS [COUNTRY]

Inter-Parliamentary Forum on Security Sector Governance (IPF-SSG) in Southeast Asia

CODE OF ETHICS FOR TAX AGENTS

Risk Oversight Committee

Recommendation of the Council for Further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions

WHISTLE-BLOWER POLICY AZURE POWER GLOBAL LIMITED

CARIBBEAN DEVELOPMENT BANK STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRITY, COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY PILLARS I, II AND III WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY

INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET CONCEPT STAGE

Examples/Suggestions: How Inspectors General/Internal Auditors Present Themselves/Their Work John A. Carey INSPECTOR GENERAL

The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises

Does the Ethiopian Budget encourage participation?

Principle 1: Ethical standards

Natural Resource Funds. North Dakota. Bismarck. North Dakota. North Dakota Legacy Fund

Bribery and Corruption

Survey on the effectiveness of Anticorruption Authorities

OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL FISCAL YEAR 2019 BUDGET TESTIMONY

Whistle Blower Policy

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool

Whistleblowers Protection Act 2001 Policy and Procedures ABN

Anti - Fraud and Corruption Policy

THE ASIA-PACIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REVIEW

External Audit of State Funds in Finland

Category: BOARD POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE PARAMETERS

Hundred and Thirty-fourth Session. Rome, October WFP Anti-Fraud and Anti-Corruption Policy

Whistleblowing Policy & Procedures. GFH Financial Group

Kansas Department of Commerce Workforce Services Policy and Procedures Manual

Beneficial ownership in Ukraine. Description and road map. EITI requirements and status of beneficial ownership implementation in Ukraine

FRAUD CONTROL AND CORRUPTION POLICY

CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP AIDE MEMOIRE AUDITING FOR SOCIAL CHANGE

AGSA Strategic plan and budget SCoAG engagement 17 November 2017

Securities Commission. Role & Functions

Fiscal Year 2018 Internal Audit Annual Report

Trinidad. and Tobago. Heritage and Stabilization Fund. Natural Resource Funds VALE COLUMBIA CENTER ON SUSTAINABLE INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT.

Law enforcement and anti corruption agencies (pillars 5 and 9)

EXTERNAL AUDIT AND OVERSIGHT TOPIC GUIDE COMPILED BY THE ANTI-CORRUPTION HELPDESK

Financial Policies and Procedures Preventing Bribery, Corruption and Money Laundering (August 2018)

5. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES

WHISTLE- BLOWER SCHEME

CSE s ANTI-FRAUD POLICY (AFP-CSE) MARCH 2015

April 2015 FC 158/12 E. Hundred and Fifty-eighth Session. Rome, May Anti-Fraud and Anti-Corruption Policy

RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

Conducting Fraud and Corruption Investigations

Transcription:

Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool MODULE 11: ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

Desired Outcome of POA 9 The tax administration is : transparent in the conduct of its activities, and accountable to the government and the community. Background Accountability and transparency are the two central pillars of good governance. Their institutionalization reflects the principle that tax administration should be answerable for the way they use public resources and exercise authority. To enhance public confidence and trust, tax administration should be openly accountable for its actions within a framework of responsibility to the minister, legislature and the general public.

Engagement of citizens through stakeholder consultation and client surveys External oversight of the tax administration s financial and operational performance by parliament and supreme audit body Independent and impartial investigation by an ombudsman or equivalent Internal mechanisms to formulate and execute integrity/ethics policy and investigate misconduct International Good Practice in Accountability and Transparency POA 9 Regular reporting to senior management of actions on recommendations of ombudsman and anticorruption agency Internal audit ensuring adherence to internal control, risk management and governance framework Internal controls to protect the systems from fraud and error Embracing ethical standards and procedures to prevent misuse of office

Performance Indicators: P9 Accountability and Transparency High Level Indicators P9-25: Internal assurance mechanism M2 P9-26: External oversight of tax administration M2 P9-27: Public perception of integrity M1 P9-28: Publication of activities, results and plans M2 The level of assurance provided by internal audit Staff integrity assurance mechanism Extent of independent external oversight of the tax agency s operations and financial performance The investigation process for suspected wrongdoing or maladministration The mechanism for monitoring public confidence in the tax administration Extent to which the financial and operational performance of the tax administration is made public, and the timeliness of publication Extent to which tax administration s future directions and plans are made public, and the timeliness of publication Dimensions

Scoring P9-25-1: Level of assurance provided by internal audit IT system controls detect incidents that threaten the confidentiality and integrity of tax administration data; audit trails of user access exist; reports and audit tools available and used by internal audit There is a central repository of all internal control policies, processes and procedures The tax administration has an independent internal audit unit reporting directly to the audit committee A Systematic and independent review of internal audit operations and systems at least once every five years Annual internal audit program comprise of internal control checks, performance audits, IT systems audit and financial audits for all key operations. There is regular training of internal auditors in audit methodologies

Scoring P9-25-1: Level of assurance provided by internal audit IT system controls detect incidents that threaten the confidentiality and integrity of tax administration data; audit trails exist; reports and audit tools available and used by internal audit Internal control policies, processes, and procedures are adequately documented The tax administration has an independent internal audit unit reporting directly to the head or board B Systematic and independent review of internal audit operations and systems at least once every seven years Annual internal audit program comprise of internal control checks, performance audits, IT systems audit and financial audits for all key operations. There is regular training of internal auditors in audit methodologies

Scoring P9-25-1: Level of assurance provided by internal audit Audit trails of user access and changes made to taxpayer data exist There is NO central repository of all internal control policies, processes and procedures The tax administration has an independent internal audit unit reporting BUT does not report directly to the head or board C Systematic and independent review of internal audit operations does not exist Annual internal audit program comprise of internal control checks, and financial audits BUT NOT performance audits, IT systems audit There is ad hoc training of internal auditors in audit methodologies

Scoring P9-25-2: Staff integrity assurance mechanisms * The integrity statistics are publicly reported. * Maintains integrityrelated statistics for the agency, while preserving confidentiality. The tax administration has an independent internal affairs unit reporting directly to the head or deputy head. A * Cooperates with relevant enforcement and prosecution agencies. The internal affairs unit: * Has appropriate investigative powers, and exercises these powers with due process. * Provides leadership to the formulation of integrity and ethics policy, including codes of conduct.

Scoring P9-25-2: Staff integrity assurance mechanisms * The integrity statistics are NOT publicly reported. DOES NOT maintain integrity-related statistics for the agency, while preserving confidentiality. The tax administration has an independent internal affairs unit reporting directly to the head or deputy head. B * Cooperates with relevant enforcement and prosecution agencies. The internal affairs unit: * Has appropriate investigative powers, and exercises these powers with due process. * Provides leadership to the formulation of integrity and ethics policy, including codes of conduct.

Scoring P9-25-2: Staff integrity assurance mechanisms * The integrity statistics are NOT publicly reported. DOES NOT maintain integrity-related statistics for the agency, while preserving confidentiality. The tax administration has an independent internal affairs unit BUT DOES NOT report directly to the head or deputy head. C * DOES NOT Cooperates with relevant enforcement and prosecution agencies. The internal affairs unit: * Has appropriate investigative powers, and exercises these powers with due process. * DOES NOT provides leadership to the formulation of integrity and ethics policy, including codes of conduct.

Scoring P9-26-1: The extent of independent external oversight of operational and financial performance Annual external audit of the tax administration s financial statements by an external review body government auditor or other independent entity) External review findings and the response of the tax administration or ministry of finance are publically reported A Annual program of operational performance audits by an external review body (e.g., government auditor) External review findings are responded to by the tax administration

Scoring P9-26-1: The extent of independent external oversight of operational and financial performance Annual external audit of the tax administration s financial statements by an external review body government auditor or other independent entity) External review findings and the response of the tax administration or ministry of finance are NOT publically reported B Annual program of operational performance audits by an external review body (e.g., government auditor) External review findings are responded to by the tax administration

Scoring P9-26-1: The extent of independent external oversight of operational and financial performance Annual external audit of the tax administration s financial statements by an external review body government auditor or other independent entity) External review findings and the response of the tax administration or ministry of finance are NOT publically reported C NO program of operational performance audits by an external review body (e.g., government auditor) External review findings are responded to by the tax administration

Scoring P9-26-2: Investigation process for wrongdoing and maladministration A tax ombudsman investigates unresolved complaints from taxpayers. Systematic service and fairness problems are reported to the tax administration and minister. There is regular (i.e., monthly) and systematic monitoring to senior management and reporting of actions taken in response to recommendations of ombudsman or anti-corruption agency. A An anti-corruption agency oversees tax administration anticorruption policies and investigates alleged corrupt conduct

Scoring P9-26-2: Investigation process for suspected wrongdoing and maladministration A tax ombudsman investigates complaints from taxpayers. Systematic service and fairness problems are not reported to the tax administration and government. There is regular (i.e., monthly) and systematic monitoring and reporting of actions taken in response to recommendations of ombudsman or anti-corruption. B An anti-corruption agency oversees tax administration anticorruption policies and investigates alleged corrupt conduct

Scoring P9-26-2: Investigation process for suspected wrongdoing and maladministration A tax ombudsman or equivalent authority exists BUT on an AD HOC basis Limited evidence that findings and recommendations of investigative agencies are acted upon systematically. C An anti-corruption agency exists BUT only investigates cases of alleged corrupt conduct. Does NOT oversee the anti-corruption policies

Scoring P9-27: Mechanism of monitoring public confidence in the tax administration A B C D Independent third party survey based on statistically valid sample to monitor level of public confidence Conducted at least every 2 years Results of survey are made public within 6 months of completion Tax administration takes the survey results into account for reviewing its integrity framework and public relations Independent third party survey based on statistically valid sample to monitor level of public confidence Conducted at least every 3 years Results of survey are made public within 9 months of completion Tax administration takes the survey results into account for reviewing its integrity framework and public relations Asurvey -conducted by tax administration itself or independent third party - based on statistically valid sample to monitor level of public confidence Conducted at least every 4 years Results of survey are made public within 9 months of completion Tax administration takes the survey results into account for reviewing its integrity framework and public relations The requirements for a C rating or higher are not met.

Scoring P9-28-1: Extent to which the financial and operational performance of the tax administration is reported A B C D A report to the government is produced on an annual basis outlining the full financial and operational performance of the tax administration for the immediate past fiscal year. The report is made public within 6 months of the end of the fiscal year A report to the government is produced on an annual basis outlining the full financial and operational performance of the tax administration for the immediate past fiscal year. The report is made public within 9 months of the end of the fiscal year A report to the government is produced on an annual basis outlining the full financial and operational performance of the tax administration for the immediate past fiscal year. The report is made public within 12 months of the end of the fiscal year The requirements for a C rating or higher are not met.

Scoring P9-28-2: Extent to which the tax administration s future directions and plans are published A B C D Strategic and operational plans are made public in advance of the period covered by the plans. Strategic and operational plans are made public within 3 months of the start of the period covered by the plans. Elements of the plan are made public within 3 months of the start of the period covered by the plans. The requirements for a C rating or higher are not met.