Peabody Coal Leases What s Wrong with this Picture? Changing the Way We Do Business

Similar documents
The Federal Indian Trust Responsibility as Defined in the U.S. v. Navajo Nation Coal Leasing Cases

Economic Benefit Analysis of the Navajo Generating Station to the Central Arizona Water Conservation District and Its Customers

The Industry Perspective: The Pros and Cons of Mineral Development in Indian Country

Case 3:18-cv ESW Document 1 Filed 06/14/18 Page 1 of 27

NAVAJO GENERATING STATION AND KAYENTA MINE: An Economic Impact Study

DOE-LM Uranium Leasing Program Overview

Discussion and Consideration of Action to Recommend that the Board approve the 2016 Final Rate Schedule

Chapter 35. General Provisions

CAGRD Agenda Number 4.

CAGRD Agenda Number 2.

Economic Impact of the Arizona Mining Industry. Arizona Mining Association 916 W. Adams Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Analysis of Revenue from U.S. Natural Resources BPC STA FF

This graph is based on extremely preliminary estimates and is likely to change substantially. It is intended to be conceptual to illustrate the

RNS Number : 2310X Atlantic Coal PLC 27 August 2015

Gregg is a frequent lecturer for the continuing legal education seminars on mineral law, conveyancing and land use topics.

STATEMENT OF THE NAVAJO NATION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General AUDIT REPORT

tes for Guidance Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 Finance Act 2017 Edition - Part 24

FY 2014 PRIORITY RANKING

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C FORM 10-K

The Economic Contribution of the Navajo Generating Station (NGS) on the City of Page

FAP Agenda Number 5 & 6.

As Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No

Tribal Benefits from Tribal Water Rights. Colorado River Water Users Association Caesar's Palace December 11 13, 2013 Margaret J.

SLIDES: Gila River Indian Community Water Settlement

URANIUM RESOURCES INC /DE/

Taxpayer information: Enter the taxpayer name, contact person, address, and telephone number in the spaces provided.

Management. BLM Funding

CHAPTER 367 PDF p. 1 of 7 CHAPTER 367 (HB 457) AN ACT relating to income taxation. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of

CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT SYSTEM USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND THE CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Business Overview and Strategy. Handout. March, 2005

ARIZONA WATER BANKING AUTHORITY

Agriculture and the Central Arizona Project

Obsidian Management Policy

PRELIMINARY DRAFT -- FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

MESA URANIUM CORP. QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS... i BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO CAGRD Enrollment and Activation... 5

FORM F4 BUSINESS ACQUISITION REPORT. Karl W. Smith Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (709)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE INTEGRA RESOURCES TO ACQUIRE DELAMAR PROJECT FROM KINROSS GOLD

TITLE Subtitle B Geothermal Energy

Water Rates Adjustments Phase 2

Energy BUSINESS PLAN ACCOUNTABILITY STATEMENT THE MINISTRY

Gone with the Wind: How Taxpayers Are Losing from

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VAIL WATER COMPANY AND THE CITY OF TUCSON RELATING TO THE DELIVERY OF CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT WATER

Summary of Tax Provisions in Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018

Total Resource (Employees Transferring) Solution Terms Annex to the EE Mobile Schedule

COAL MINE RECLAMATION

Southern California Edison Company

Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements of

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Total Resource (No Employees Transferring) Solution Terms Annex to the EE Mobile Schedule

Subject: Discretionary Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement to Modernize the Federal Coal Program

LOST PINES GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT OPERATING PERMIT

NEWMONT MINING CORP /DE/

MESA URANIUM CORP. QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010

Mineral Revenue Collections January - December 2000

Opportunity to Comment.

Entergy, NorthStar Reach Settlement Agreement with State of Vermont and Other Parties on Terms for the Approval of the Sale of Vermont Yankee

GOLD RESOURCE CORPORATION REPORTS 2017 NET INCOME OF $4.2 MILLION, OR $0.07 PER SHARE; PROVIDES 2018 PRODUCTION OUTLOOK

PERSHING RESOURCES COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

(An Exploration Stage Company) CONDENSED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited Prepared by Management) (Expressed in Canadian dollars)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Advancing Angola s Mining Sector: Reform and Investment

The Crown Mineral Royalty Regulations

White Paper. Copyright 2018 RESERVE

NORDIC GOLD INC. (Formerly Firesteel Resources Corp.)

NEWMONT MINING CORP /DE/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. Arizona Public Service Company ) Docket No. ER

CASH RESERVE POLICY ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON DECEMBER 8, 2016

Petroteq Energy Inc. (Formerly MCW Energy Group Limited)

Application for Services The Miners Hospital and Clinic, University of Utah

MCW Energy Group Limited

KANSAS STATUTES AND REGULATIONS FOR MINERALS SEVERANCE TAX

Investment Overview. Present Value

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND 2007 (UNAUDITED)

FORM 10-K SIERRA PACIFIC RESOURCES /NV/ - SRP. Exhibit: Filed: March 16, 2005 (period: December 31, 2004)

Southern California Edison Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No E Rosemead, California (U 338-E) Cancelling Revised Cal. PUC Sheet No.

Taxation on Indian Reservations: To Balance or Not to Balance, That Is the Question

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act International Aspects. Al Hudec Farris, Vaughan, Wills & Murphy September 30, 2010

LOUISIANA SEVERANCE TAX

CONDENSED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. March 31, (Unaudited - Prepared by Management)

VOLUNTARY IRRIGATION SUSPENSION PROGRAM OPTION FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT (five-year term) AGREEMENT

(3) received less than $200,000 in payments from the LIHEAP program for propane

NEWS RELEASE NR: October 11, 2017

!!! CALIFORNIA! !!!! !! STYLE PALMS, Inc.! !! DISCLOSURE INFORMATION JANUARY 10, 2017!

DENISON MINES CORP. Financial Statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2012

White Energy Company Limited

Key factors in determining investment in mining

FORM 6-K/A SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WHAT IS THE OUTLOOK FOR THE MINING INDUSTRY INTERNATIONALLY?

Except as otherwise provided in this title, 1 for purposes of this title, 1 the following definitions shall apply:

WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. Management s Discussion and Analysis For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 (Stated in $USD)

AVIDIAN GOLD INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND (Expressed in US Dollars)

Massey Energy Company February 2007

URANIUM MARKET AND STRATEGY. Robert van Niekerk Senior Vice President: Organisational Effectiveness

Coeur Files Technical Report for Kensington Mine

TITLE 18. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 14. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PERMIT AND COMPLIANCE FEES ARTICLE 1. WATER QUALITY PROTECTION FEES

Update Report August 17, 2017 SILVER SPRUCE RESOURCES INC.

WHAT IS THE OUTLOOK FOR THE MINING INDUSTRY INTERNATIONALLY?

FIDUCIARY ISSUES AND HOW TO AVOID BEING A DEFENDANT

Transcription:

Peabody Coal Leases What s Wrong with this Picture? Changing the Way We Do Business

Shortcomings of Peabody Coal Leases 2 Since the beginning of Peabody Coal Leases (mid-1960 s), Peabody has not paid Hopi and Navajo at Fair Market Value for coal and water No appraisal or valuation is made of coal and water that will be leased before leases are signed Coal leases are measured by surface acres not by tons of coal deposits and gallons of water (N-Aquifer) This results in tribes not receiving compensation for fair market value of the resources

Shortcomings of Peabody Coal Leases Coal leases do not provide for inflation factor locks in the present value of coal and water although price of a resource like coal & water are highly volatile Coal leases give Peabody Coal full subsurface rights to minerals (except oil and gas) for which it pays nothing 3 Coal leases lock in the coal and water for the duration of the leases This keeps the tribes from opportunities to market coal (and other mineral) resources and diversify their economy

Shortcomings of Peabody Coal Leases 4 Coal leases do not provide for tribal taxation (value taxes) Peabody pays minimal annual fixed bonuses and scholarships Peabody has not complied with the conditions of leases Finding alternative sources of water Treat and release water used for mining Many other lease violations

Leases Give Peabody Big Advantage 5 Commodities, like coal and water, have a value determined by the futures market (supply-demand) but Peabody leases: are different. The leases: Give Peabody incredible leverage it can use in the market because they receive subsurface rights to all minerals and kindred products, except oil and gas. Coal, Water, Copper, Uranium, Silver, Gold Significantly builds Peabody s company portfolio without Peabody paying anything for coal and water

Leases Give Peabody Big Advantage 6 Peabody Leases (continued): Gives Peabody one buyer (NGS) which reduces Peabody s risk Gives Peabody a lock on the market creates a Monopoly Gives Peabody and its holding companies huge control over tribal resources and profits from use of these resources Takes away tribal control of their resources

So What is Value Chain? 7 Most products change hands many times before they reach the final consumer Input suppliers, producers, processors, wholesalers and retailers produce, transform, store, transfer or market the product, adding to its value at each step in the process ( Value Chain ) Value Chain refers to this range of activities that brings a product or a service from its conception to its end use in a particular industry

Value Chain Process 8 Production of electricity is no different: Supplier of Coal & Water (Hopi & Navajo) Producer of Mined Coal (Peabody Coal) Manufacturer of Electricity (Navajo Generating Station) Marketer /Distributor of Electricity (Navajo Generating Station Public Utilities Bureau of Reclamation) Customers (Cities in Arizona, Nevada & Southern California, Central Arizona Project, Industry, Southern Arizona Tribes, Households) Owners of Navajo Generating Station (Manufacturers) are also Customers of Navajo Generating Station

What is Wrong with this Picture? 9 But, there is a big difference in how the Value Chain model is applied regarding Hopi and Navajo Coal and Water Leases and processes are structured to keep tribes from receiving fair compensation and do not allow tribes to participate in the Value Chain Peabody is taking advantage because tribes do not have a railroad, and do not have ability to do their own mining; and do not tax Peabody NGS and customers benefit greatly from the Value Chain, e.g. SRP s 26% profit in 2011

Value Chain Economic Model Mining & Marketing of Hopi & Navajo Coal & Water 10 Peabody Mines Peabody Sells NGS Produces NGS Sells Utilities Buy/Sell FMV Leases Signed based on Surface Acres (Not Tons of Coal & AFY) - - - - - No Valuation of Assets No Payment to Tribes on Value Peabody Coal Mined (e.g. 8MT/Yr) N-Aquifer Pumped Peabody Peabody Sells Coal to NGS NGS NGS Produces Electricity Burns Coal N-Aquifer Pumped NGS NGS Sells Electricity to Utility Companies (SRP, APS, SCE, TGE, NP, BOR) Utility Companies Utility Companies Sell Electricity to Customers - - - - - - - - - Industry, Agriculture, Cities, Homeowners Sell/Use Electricity Coal Deposit (1.8BTs) N-Aquifer (Billions of Gallons) Minimal Fees Paid to Tribes For Mining Leases Small Royalty to Tribes (12.5% & 6.25%) No Value Tax Paid To Tribes No Fees & Value Tax Paid To Tribes Small Royalty To Navajo (None to Hopi) No Value Tax Paid To Tribes State Gets Tax Revenues

Peabody Coal Lease Reopener Coal Leases Require Negotiation Every Ten Years Lease requires a renegotiation every 10 years 11 1987 1997 2007 2017 2011 What is Gross Realization? Gross sales price at mining site without any deductions of overhead sales costs or any other business expense. Peabody pays 12.5% and 6.25% of monthly gross realization to Navajo and Hopi

Where Our Coal Goes Coal from Kayenta Mine goes to Navajo Generating Station via electric rail 12 Coal from Black Mesa Mine went to Mohave Generating Station (now closed) via coal slurry. MGS shut down in 2005 About 400 million tons have been mined since mid-1960 s Millions, if not billions, of pristine N-Aquifer was withdrawn to slurry coal to MGS

Overview Hopi/Peabody Lease Hopi Lease, No. 14-20-0450-5743 (Sentry Royalty) Now No. 14-20-0603-9910: Signed June 6, 1966 Royalty paid 6.25% (Shared equally with Navajo Nation) 40,000 acres for $1.00 for 10-Years Peabody has Exclusive Right to prospect, mine, strip lands, develop water wells for coal and kindred products including other minerals except oil & gas Water for slurry purposes from depths greater than 1,000 feet for $1.67 per acre-foot per year Peabody required to find alternative sources of water Current Reopener Not Approved by Hopi 13

Overview Hopi/Peabody Lease Initial Royalty Payments: 14 o 3.335% of Monthly Gross Realization (not to exceed 12.5 cents per ton) off the 1882 Executive Order Area o 2.665% of Monthly Gross Realization (not to exceed 10.0 cents per ton) on the 1882 Executive Order Area o $0.50 cents per acre per year paid in advance during first 5 years o $1.00 dollar per acre per year paid in advance for remaining 5 years o Peabody liable for damages o Wanted additional 200 million tons by the end of the 10 Year Lease

Hopi & Peabody Coal Lease (Alternative Source of Water Provision) 15 Should the Secretary of the Interior determine, at any time, that the operation of wells by Lessee is endangering the supply of underground water in the vicinity or so lowering the water table that other users of such water are being damaged, he may, at his option, either (1) require Lessee or Peabody Coal Company, at its sole expense, to provide water in quantity and of quality equal to that formerly available from such underground supply to such other users, by deepening the letter s (sic) wells or otherwise, or (2) require Lessee or Peabody Coal Company, at its own sole expense, to obtain water for its mining and pipe line operations from another source, that will not significantly affect the supply of underground water in the vicinity.

Overview Navajo/Peabody Leases 16 Navajo Nation entered into a Coal Lease No. 14-20-0603-8580 with Sentry Royalty (Navajo Exclusive) Signed February 1, 1964 Amended in 1987 Renewed April 2011 Royalty Rate 12.5% Navajo Nation entered into a Coal Lease, No. 14-20-0603-9910 (Shared with Hopi) Signed June 6, 1966 Amended in 1987 Renewed April 2011 by Navajo Nation Shared with Hopi Tribe Royalty Rates 6.25% for Each Tribe

Navajo Leases Combined Reopener Approved by Navajo April 2011 17 Lease 8580 Navajo Exclusive Lease 9910 Shared 50-50 with Hopi Royalties 12.5% Scholarships - $165,000 Bonus - $1,750,000 Annually One Time Signing Bonus - $775,000 Royalties 6.25% Scholarships - $83,000 Bonus - $1,750,000 Annually One Time Signing Bonus - $775,000

Repener Comparison (Hopi-Navajo) Navajo Nation (9910) Royalties 6.25% Scholarships - $83,000 Bonus - $1,750,000 Annually One Time Signing Bonus - $775,000 18 Hopi Tribe (9910) - Proposed Royalties 6.25% Scholarships - $85,000 Bonus - $1,365,000 Annually One Time Signing Bonus - $700,000 Note: Navajo Nation s 1999 RICO Lawsuit against Peabody Coal, Southern Cal Edison and SRP. Hopi intervened in the Navajo lawsuit in 1999. Navajo earlier filed suit against Federal government in 1993 for breach of fiduciary duty for approving the 12.5% Royalty Rate when Navajo claims the rate should have been 20.0%. Information on recent purported settlements of the RICO lawsuits by both tribes is being investigated.

Suggested Ways We Change the Process 19 Change basis of leases to provide for tons of coal and acre feet of water in addition to surface acres upon lease signing Require Peabody to pay upfront each year for coal to be mined and water to be withdrawn based on current Fair Market Value Provide for annual price adjustments based on market prices ( mark to market ) Example: 8.0 Million Tons Mined Each Year at Current Market Price Prohibit pumping of N-Aquifer for mining purposes

Suggested Ways We Change the Process Increase royalties, annual bonuses, and scholarships 20 Provide for tribal taxation ( value taxes ) on: Coal and Water Deposits that are subject to leases Mining and Withdrawal of Coal and Water Sale of Coal to NGS Sale of Electricity by NGS Notify Peabody that leases will be advertised and negotiated with highest bidder after 2017 And/or tribes can enter the Carbon Credits market

Change the Way We Do Business 21 Now is the time to change the way coal leases are structured Tribes must dictate the pricing and process exercise Economic Sovereignty Demand upfront annual payment for coal and water at Fair Market Value Limit leases to coal and water only and exclude other kindred products

Change the Way We Do Business Prohibit use of N-Aquifer Require Peabody to comply with the lease and develop alternative sources of water It is time we start considering alternative uses of our natural resources Diversify use and market for coal resources 22 Create a Tax Ordinance and impose appropriate taxes on Peabody

Hold Peabody Accountable It is time tribes hold Peabody accountable for damage done to resources 23 Require Peabody to reclaim mine area and restore N- Aquifer If Peabody cannot live up to tribal demands, then advertise and open the leases to competition

Thank you for your time 24 Prepared and presented by: Benjamin Nuvamsa Member of Inter-Tribal COALition Former Hopi Tribal Chairman