EITI - THE NORWEGIAN ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2014

Similar documents
Validation of Zambia Validation Report Adam Smith International Independent Validator 10 August 2017

EITI Board 11 January Board decision on the Validation of Nigeria. Decision reference: /BC-224

Guidance note 18: SOE participation in EITI Reporting

Board decision on the Validation of Burkina Faso

Board decision on the Validation of Côte d Ivoire

Validation of Mali Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

BEST PRACTICES IN IMPLEMENTING EITI

Validation Report Sustainable Development Strategies Group (SDSG), Independent Validator 20 January 2017

Validation of Burkina Faso Draft Validation Report Adam Smith International Independent Validator December 11 th 2017

Validation of Tanzania Draft Validation Report Adam Smith International Independent Validator 27 July 2017

TOR FOR A TARGETED EFFORT ON TRANSPARECY IN COMMODITY TRADING

AUSTRALIA COMMITS TO THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE

Norway. Extractive Industries. EITI Reporting. Seeing results from natural resources. EITI Countries

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Cash flows from the petroleum industry in Norway 2013

STRENGHTENING GOVERNANCE IN TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO S EXTRACTIVE SECTORS The role of the EITI. TTEITI Secretariat April 2013

From Reports to Reforms: Formulating Country Strategies for Implementing Recommendations from EITI Reports

Framework and organization

Field Development Plan. Jan Bygdevoll Discipline leader Reservoir Engineering Norwegian Petroleum Directorate Manila 7.

Papua New Guinea Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

The benefits for Uganda of joining the emerging global transparency standard for extractive industry revenues

STATE ORGANISATION OF PETROLEUM ACTIVITIES

Revenue Transparency in Extractive Economies: Innovations and Assessment Tools

Contents. I. General Assessment of Year s Performance... 1 A. Summary of Activities... B. Developing The Fourth and Fifth EITI Report...

Guidance note 15 on infrastructure provisions and barter arrangements Requirement 4.1(d)

Draft Natural Resource Fiscal Transparency Code

Prior to submitting the BO roadmaps, Honduras and Trinidad and Tobago have started approaching BO disclosures in practice.

FINAL REPORT. Scoping Study for the EITI in Kazakhstan

MONGOLIA EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE MONGOLIA NINTH EITI RECONCILIATION REPORT 2014 DECEMBER 2015

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Improving EI: Emerging Lessons and Results from EITI implementation in the GAC context

PRESIDENTIAL REGULATION REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 26 YEAR 2010 REGARDING TRANSPARENCY OF NATIONAL/LOCAL EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY REVENUES

Project Information Document/ Identification/Concept Stage (PID)

Making it add up. A constructive critique of the EITI Reporting Guidelines and Source Book

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative

Strengthening systematic disclosures related to State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and Commodity Trading. EITI Partner Retreat, Norway September 2018

The Norwegian experience

8/8/2012. Workshop Sharing on Transparency Yangon, July FABBY TUMIWA INSTITUTE FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICES REFORM

ACTIVITY COMPLETION SUMMARY (ACS)

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP ROADMAP FOR THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES IN AZERBAIJAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. December 2016

Re: EITIMDTF Grant No. TF Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Indonesia - Phase 2

2016 Annual Work Plan For the EITI Implementation in Azerbajan

Validation of Iraq Draft Validation Report Adam Smith International Independent Validator 10 August 2017

INTEGRATED SAFEGUARDS DATA SHEET CONCEPT STAGE. Energy and Extractive Industries Transparency and Accountability

MONGOLIA EITI MSWG MEETING MINUTES. August

ZAMBIA EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRASPARENCY INITIATIVE

A short guide for our stakeholders

EITI and challenges associated with resource development

Mongolia EITI 2018 Work Plan

Assessment of Angolan Oil Sector - Final Report VOLUME 4c - Review of the Regulatory roles of State owned Oil Companies in Norway and Indonesia

Report on initial data collection and stakeholder consultation

RWI Index Questionnaire: Equatorial Guinea 2012

Petroleum Revenue Bill

MYANMAR LEGAL. Myanmar Upstream Oil & Gas Sector. July 2013

LIBERIA EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE (LEITI)

Public Disclosure Copy

APPENDIX TERMS OF REFERENCE. Terms of Reference for Consultant services in accordance with the EITI Standard 2013 OIL & GAS AUDIT

Papua New Guinea Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (PNG EITI)

Validation of Madagascar Draft Validation Report Adam Smith International Independent Validator April 5th 2018

Guidance note 26 - Reporting on first trades in oil

4. Forest Revenues. GFI Guidance Manual 182

The World Bank MW: Mining Governance and Growth Support Project (P120825)

Zambia EITI Beneficial Ownership Roadmap

Reforming State-Owned Enterprises in the Extractive Industries: International Experiences and Implications for Myanmar

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) IDENTIFICATION/CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: PIDC Tanzania: EI Accountability and Governance Enhancement Project

1 Introduction. 2 What is the EITI?

Oil for Development in South Sudan. Program Document for an Institutional Cooperation between

HOW SHOULD COUNTRY-BY-COUNTRY REPORTING FOR COMPANIES IN THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES BE INTRODUCED IN NORWAY?

The Importance of Transparency and Macroeconomic Management in Extractive Industries Economies

Report on initial data collection and stakeholder consultation

OPEN BUDGET INITIATIVE, EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES TRANSPARENCY INITIATIVE (EITI) and OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP

Norwegian code of practice for corporate governance

Project Information Document/ Identification/Concept Stage (PID)

Session 2: Operational Aspects of Fiscal Policy in Resource-Rich Countries (21 March at 11.30am)

ENGLISH FRANÇAIS РУССКИЙ

Fiscal Rules and Natural Resource Funds

Managing oil revenues Norway s experience

Who s who in Zambian mining?

Disclosing government payments update. July 2013

T R A N S P A R E N C Y R E P O R T

Financial reporting for companies listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange

GLOBAL VOTING GUIDELINES

Norges Bank s regional network. Round National charts Interviews carried out 5 November through 30 November, 2012

Regulation on the implementation of the European Economic Area (EEA) Financial Mechanism

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) IDENTIFICATION/CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: PIDC Project Name

LEITILiberia Extractive

UKF Project Monitoring Guidelines Version 4

Communication Program to Support Fiscal Reform and Decentralization in Mongolia. Stakeholder Mapping Analysis (Summary of the report)

2017 ZEITI ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY AND THE NORWEGIAN PETROLEUM DIRECTORATE CONCERNING

THE NATIONAL TREASURY AND PLANNING

EITI Implementation in Nigeria: Outcomes, Impacts and Challenges

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE POLICY. Scanship Holding ASA. Adopted by the Board of Directors on 14 March 2014

A Structured Approach to Modernising Government Financial Reporting

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Validation of Ghana

MINISTRY OF MINING REPORTING OF MINING AND MINERAL RELATED ACTIVITIES 2016 MEMORANDUM

The World Bank NEITI Reporting Compliance (P162344)

EITI INDONESIA PROGRESS REPORT

Methodology of the Resource Governance Index

EITI International Secretariat December EITI and CONNEX: Lessons, Challenges and Complementarity

Svein Gjedrem: From oil and gas to financial assets Norway s Government Pension Fund Global

Bilateral Guideline. EEA and Norwegian Financial Mechanisms

Transcription:

EITI - THE NORWEGIAN ANNUAL ACTIVITY REPORT 2014 1. Background Leaders from a group of governments, companies and civil society came together a little more than ten years ago and agreed that the prudent use of natural resource wealth should be an important engine for sustainable economic growth that contributes to sustainable development and poverty reduction. EITI s principles are that public understanding of government revenues and expenditure over time could help public debate and inform choice of appropriate and realistic options for sustainable development. Norway became an EITI candidate in 2009 and delivered our first EITI-report the same year. The country has been compliant with EITI requirements since March 2011. Compliance means that Norway has published satisfactory EITI Reports and has a functioning EITI process to oversee the level of transparency and accountability. The reports from the Norwegian multi stakeholder group (MSG) have described the activities that are relevant for implementation of EITI in Norway. Each country owns its own EITI process and sets its own objectives. The new EITI standard approved in 2013 has further strengthened the process and encourage more information about the extracive industy sector in each country. The MSG should have a national approach. The Norwegian MSG has focused on developing a high quality report containing the relevant information about revenues and companies payments to the government. The EITI-reports have all confirmed payments published in other sources like i.e. the state account. The Norwegian MSG has now raised the question if it's meaningful to continue the reporting and reconciliation of payments. The way ahead and alternatives to the reporting are being discussed. A vital part of EITI is the disclosure of information. The EITI Standard will require countries to disclose production figures, the ownership of license holders and

government participation in the extractive sector. The Standard encourages countries to disclose ultimate beneficial ownership as well as production contracts. Information about the Norwegian petroleum related activities have been available to the public since the discovery of oil and gas 45 years ago. One important source of information has been the Petroleum Register published by Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) ( http://www.npd.no/en/news/news/2013/the-petroleum-register-on-the- NPDs-Fact-Pages/ ) and Facts Reports published by The Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy in cooperation with Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. This spring the Facts Reports were replaced by a new more user-friendly website (www.norskpetroleum.no ) where readers can learn more about Norwegian petroleum history, current activity and framework conditions. Data from NPD is synchronised daily. The Government is also preparing for an updated electronic and public available shareholder register register of companies registered in Norway. Further, Norwegian companies in the extractive industry sector and forest industry will according to new regulations implemented January 2014, have to disclose payments to governments in third couuntries (country by country reporting) The public debate in Norway is not about transparency in revenues and expenditures, but more about the activity level, opening new acreage for exploration, and with high focus on safety and the environment. Implementing the new EITI Standards will not change significantly the public's access to information or the public debate. The Norwegian multi stakeholder group is appointed by the King in Council for a period of 2 years in line with EITI requirements. A new MSG was appointed in June 2014 after each sub-group within the MSG had nominated their candidates and the whole MSG agreed on the composition of the group. Multi stakeholder group work on EITI in 2014 The multi stakeholder group s main activity in 2014 was preparing and finalizing the sixth Norwegian EITI-report The sixth report was carried out in accordance with the new EITI Standard. The MSG also finished the nomination process for appointment of a new MSG. The contract with the Administrator ended in

2014 and the MSG took active part in preparing the tender for a new contract and the selection process afterwards. A new contract was signed between Deloitte and the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. The Norwegian MSG has discussed if a continuation of reporting and reconciliation is the best way forward. The multi stakeholder group held one meeting during 2014. Members of the group used emails to exchanged information and make required decisions. The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy published the EITI-report on its website. Companies and governmental entities who had been reporting were provided the report. Norsk olje & gass (the Norwegian Oil and Gas Association) informed their members about EITI and the report. The data from the EITI-report have been made available on the Norwegian MSG's web site ( www.eiti.no )in Excel format. The data has also been made available on a public web site (www.data.norge.no) where people are invited to share data. Reporting and reconciliation of the 2013 data has been the main priority of MSG in 2014 as the report was the first under the new EITI-standards. A draft report was sent to the MSG in November and a MSG meeting was held 10. December to discuss the report. The Administrator, Deloitte Norge, presented the main conclusions and in which area the report might not be in compliance with the new EITI-standards. The following EITI Requirements was mentioned by the Administrator and discussed by the MSG; EITI Requirement 4.1.b dividend from Statoil EITI Requirement 3.6 SOEs Disclosure of Quasi fiscal expenditure such as payments for social services EITI Requirement 4.1 e and d infrastructure and barter arrangements and social expenditure EITI Requirement 3.5 value of production and export by commodity EITI Requirement 3.9 b iii) date of application and award and 3.12 Contracts Ad EITI Requirement 4.1 The MSG pointed to the fact that Statoil is listed at the Oslo Stock Exchange. Dividend is paid per share and the information is publicly available. It's reported among other places in the state account as well as on Statoil's website. The EITI-report publish Statoil dividend in its report but the number is not reconciled. Ad EITI Requirement 3.6; The MSG concluded this is not relevant to Statoil. It is a company listed on at the stock exchange, operating as a commercial company and subject to the same laws and regulations as all (oil and gas ) other companies active in Norway.

EITI Requirement 4.1 d and e; The MSG concluded this is not relevant to Norway. Our understanding of this requirement is that only payments related to contract/license obligations shall be reported. Norwegian production licenses do not have such obligations. Further, expenditures related to sponsorships (NGOs, sport, culture etc.) are numerous, each immaterial and they are volunteer not contractual. EITI Requirement 3.5 The MSG concluded that public available information in this area is already satisfying. For the purpose of EITI dividing payments by commodity is not relevant. Companies on the Norwegian Continental Shelf market and sell their own equity oil and/or gas. Tax payments are based on the company's net income and does not divide between fields or commodities. Companies do not pay royalties. EITI Requirement 3.9 b iii and 3.12). Available at the Petroleum Register is extensive information about each production license and licensee i.e. when the production license was awarded, working program, operator, etc. The award of a production license is according to a standard license agreement Contract (which is available at the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy's website https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/oed/pdf_filer_2/og/utvinningstillatelse.pdf ) The MSG concluded that already available information was extensive and satisfying. Further, according to The EITI Guidance note; Annual Activity Report this report should include any actions undertaken to prepare for implementation of the EITI Standard, including addressing issues such as revenue management and expenditure (3.7-3.8), transportation payments (4.1.f), discretionary social expenditures (4.1.e), ad-hoc subnational transfers (4.2.e), beneficial ownership (3.11) and contracts (3.12). The requirements marked in bold have not been included in the MSG's activities because they've not been seen as relevant in a Norwegian context. As regard revenue management and expenditure (3.7-3.8) all the state's revenues from petroleum activities and gas sector are transferred into The Government Pension Fund Global. The expected return from the fund can be spent over the fiscal budget. There are no specific transportation payments to the Government. Companies pay taxes based on their net income whether revenues come from selling oil and gas and/or pipeline tariffs. All income streams are treated the same an included in the reporting. There are no ad-hoc subnational transfers. Regarding beneficial ownership the Governnet is currently working on establishing an electronic register of ownership of Norwegian companies which will be open to the public. MSG approved the report. The report was published at http://www.eiti.no early January 2014. A printed version in both Norwegian and English is available. The MSG agreed not to organize any specific event in relation to the release of the report.

After the 5 th EITI-report and where none of them had any unexplained discrepancies the MSG agreed there is little value in continuing with these reports. The civil society group presented a position paper to the MSG by early summer 2014. The subject was debated at the MSG meeting later the same year without a conclusion. The process continued into 2015. The mining sector is not included in the Norwegian EITI-report due to lack of materiality in the country. The MSG had however expressed an interest in learning more about the mining sector in Norway. At a MSG meeting in 2014 Norsk Bergverksindustri (an association of the Norwegian mineral resource based industry) gave a presentation about the mineral and mining sector as well as their view on including this sector in the EITI reporting. The MSG maintained their previous decision not to include Norwegian mining industry in the EITI-reporting. The MSG s work plan for 2014, including cost, is available on the EITI web site. The reporting templates are available on the web as well. Follow-up of validation team recommendations and/or recommendations. Regulations of 26.6.2009 (856) are guiding the work in the MSG. The multi stakeholder group has agreed on the terms of reference and made them available on the website. The companies chief executive director (CEO) had to sign the EITI submission according to the initial requirements. The multi stakeholder group has agreed to accept that companies chief financial officer (CFO) can sign the report. Companies are also required to enclose an auditor s statement to ensure that they have produced and delivered an audit report without any comments from the auditor with relevance for the EITI. Norway has had an open and transparent system since the early 1970s. Relevant information was available to the public. Parliament had frequent discussions on the oil and gas policies and strategies. Media had from the early years and still has - wide coverage of the sector due to its major role in the Norwegian economy. Members of the MSG contribute to the debate through their different organizations.

The Norwegian EITI website was established early 2011. It contains information relevant to the Norwegian implementation of EITI, as well as links to relevant information of the domestic upstream oil and gas activities. The website contains general EITI information and explanation and/or links to where information is available. Minutes from MSG meetings are available on the EITI website. Reporting process and templates have been discussed both within in the MSG and with the reporting entities and is under constant review. The ambition has been from the beginning to deliver simple and efficient, but sufficient reporting. The Norwegian MSG has delivered five EITI-reports without any unexplained differences in reported numbers by companies and government. It confirms Norway has in place a system of high standards of transparency and accountability. The multi stakeholder group has discussed the benefits of continuing the current EITI-reporting since the information is publically available without the EITI report. The report has limited value for the Norwegian public, but may have some value as a reference for stakeholder groups in other EITI implementing countries. The Norwegian EITI report has found its format. It is difficult to see how it can be further simplified and at kept at the same disaggregated level. Reconciliation of the data is the most time consuming part of the work. The group has discussed using the Bureau of Statistic Norway to do the work, but the bureau does not focus on the disaggregated level required by EITI and it is difficult to see how the Bureau or other agencies will use less time. One of the multi stakeholder group s objectives has been to find a fair balance between the different interests group; civil society, trade unions, oil companies and the ministries. The most relevant Ministries are members of the group, and these members represent the government and secure the full depth of political engagement in the process. The oil industry has nominated their candidates, as has civil society organizations and the trade unions.

The multi stakeholder group has not seen a need for a separate EITI secretariat. The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy has functioned as the secretariat. It has worked well. Most of the work related to the Norwegian implementation of EITI have to be done by the Ministry, independent to how the secretariat function is organized. The multi stakeholder group will continue to discuss the best way to meet and implement the new EITI standards in Norway.