SE A T T L E T R A NSPO R T A T I O N B E N E F I T DIST RI C T R ESO L U T I O N 5

Similar documents
Legislation Passed July 14, 2015

CITY OF SEATTLE ORDINANCE

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

NOTICE AND CALL OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE KERMAN CITY COUNCIL. The sole business to be conducted is as follows:

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

1 (b) Reconstruct and rehabilitate state highways to better maintain 2 them and prevent and avoid costly future repairs; 3 (c) Support local

CITY OF MOUNTLAKE TERRACE ORDINANCE NO. 2711

BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 303 KITSAP COUNTY, WASHINGTON

MOTION NO. M Agreement with the City of Seattle and King County Metro for Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel Mitigation

Frequently Asked Questions County Road Maintenance Sales Tax Proposition 403: Your Roads. Your Decision.

RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION OF LEVY (Multi Year)

DEBT POLICY Policy 520

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

CLAREMONT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. A Refresher on CIP s

Transportation Trust Fund Overview

RESOLUTION NO. R Baseline Budget and Schedule, and Approve Gates 5 and 6 for the East Link Extension

Cancelled. Final Action

ORDINANCE NO Project

Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study. Minneapolis Public Works Transportation Infrastructure Study

ACTION STRATEGIES. Aurora Places is the guidebook

Removed Projects TR th Way SE (Snake Hill) Improvements o Will be completed in TR th Ave SE Gap Project

AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

MONTE SERENO BETTER STREETS COMMISSION AGENDA 7:00 P.M. Thursday March 8, 2018 Regular Meeting

Ballot Measure F2018. To establish a reasonable tax on the operation of an allowed cannabis business within the City. What is it?

RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution approving the Debt Management and Disclosure Policy.

RESOLUTION. WHEREAS, the City Attorney has presented the following ballot title and question for the proposed general obligation bond proposition:

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT HILLS TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE (# ) TO REPEAL SENATE BILL 1 THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

Legislation Passed February 5, 2013

Analysis of the Alameda County Transportation Expenditure Plan Prepared by Alameda County Transportation Commission

RESOLUTION NO. RES

CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT. Agenda No. Key Words: Marijuana Tax Meeting Date: April 26, 2016 PREPARED BY: Douglas L. White, City Attorney

STATE OF WASHINGTON ) County of Kittitas )

CITY OF HEALDSBURG RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BONNEY LAKE, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

2018 Property Tax Levy $28,699, Estimated Property Tax Levy $30,200,000 FINANCIAL IMPACT:

January 25, 2016 M E M O R A N D U M MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL BRETT ESTES, CITY MANAGER LOCAL OPTION TAX - MARIJUANA RETAILERS DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS

REVENUE BOND Policies & Procedures

Good people creating a good transportation value for a better quality of life.

City of Portsmouth Portsmouth, New Hampshire Department of Public Works

Chapter 13 FISCAL MANAGEMENT. Article 1. Fiscal Management

Chapter 3: Regional Transportation Finance

DRAFT for Typesetter Legal Text of Local Ballot Measures for November 6, 2018, Consolidated General Election

ORDINANCE NO. STA-16-01

TAX LEVY A. TAX AT A GLANCE B. TAX LEVY SOURCES VIII-1

Council Agenda Report

RIDOA STATEWIDE PLANNING PROGRAM Transportation Planning

ALAMEDA COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS LIST OF LOCAL MEASURES November 6, 2012 GENERAL ELECTION MEASURE I

SB 83 Additional Vehicle Registration Fee Expenditure Plan (July 15, 2010)

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 148

THE VILLAGE OF SAUK VILLAGE COOK AND WILL COUNTIES, ILLINOIS ORDINANCE NUMBER

Updated 5/17/2018 8:30 AM Oakland County Official Proposal List August 7, 2018 Primary Election

Board of Directors Meeting Monday March 26, :30 p.m.

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

WHEREAS, if the Special Sales Tax is approved by the voters on November 8, 2011, it will be imposed on April 1, 2012; and

Report to the City Council

ISSAQUAH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 411 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON UNLIMITED TAX GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, 2017 RESOLUTION NO. 1095

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FISCAL POLICY

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO No

Establishing an Estimated Annual Tax Levy Ceiling for the Tax Year 2017.

CITY OF BURBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: AUGUST 31, 2010 TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMISSION (TAC)

CITY OF TEXARKANA, TEXAS

EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO.

STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Jefferson. City Council of Port Townsend Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County } } } } } } }

RECEIVED On in I #2. 3tPm

pm»i»i fh <m L'* f * u 1g I05n II I t \ MICHAEL N. FEUER CITY ATTORNEY REPORT RE:

10-Year Capital Highway Investment Plan DRAFT

AGENDA REPORT. 1. Resolution. Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Item Number: D 7 To: From:

RESOLUTION 16/17-4 A RESOLUTION OF GREATER ALBANY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.

TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT

ORDINANCE NUMBER:

MEASURE J: CHARTER AMENDMENT REGARDING USE OF LEASE REVENUE FROM MISSION BAY PARK October 2016

77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2800 CHAPTER... AN ACT

University Link LRT Extension

WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS WHEREAS

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA

ORDINANCE NO. 511 THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ALTURAS DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

Analysis of Act 89 of 2013

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH70631-LBxz-401T (1/22) Short Title: Congestion Relief/Intermodal Transport Fund.

Black Lake Special District

School District of Green Lake

CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 6, 2015 FOCUS SESSION RESULTS. City Council s 2015 Priorities

Audit Committee Terms of Reference

ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF BURIEN AGENDA BILL

RFP ADDENDUM # 1 CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 455 NORTH REXFORD DRIVE BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210

AGENDA REPORT. DATE: November 27, City Commission. Kim D. Leinbach, Interim City Manager

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY, IN THE COUNTY OF ESSEX, NEW JERSEY, AS FOLLOWS: NON-UNION EMPLOYEES

MEETING DATE: 3/06/2018 ITEM NO: 07 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL

RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ST. CHARLES COUNTY AMBULANCE DISTRICT, AS FOLLOWS:

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

Village Plan Commission Ordinances

BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY CERTIFICATION NARRATIVE FY 2016

City of Woodinville, Washington 2018 WORK PLAN - MAJOR PROJECTS. Draft presented to City Council 01/16/2018. First Quarter 2018 Jan-Mar

STAFF REPORT. MEETING October 24, City Council. Regan M. Candelario, City Manager Jessica Deakyne, Senior Management Analyst

Chapter 4: Regional Transportation Finance

Transcription:

August 0, 0 SE A T T L E T R A NSPO R T A T I O N B E N E F I T DIST RI C T Form last revised on //0 R ESO L U T I O N A RESOLUTION of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District concerning a voter-approved license tab fee to pay for transportation needs; submitting a ballot measure regarding transportation funding to the qualified electors of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District at an election to be held on November, ; requesting that the King County Director of Elections call a special election in conjunction with the November, general election and submit the proposition to Seattle Transportation Benefit District voters; requesting that the King County Prosecutor prepare a ballot title; requesting that the Seattle City Attorney prepare an explanatory statement ; and appointing a committee to prepare the pro statement for voter's pamphlet. WHEREAS, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), Chapter., provides for the establishment of transportation benefit districts by cities and counties and authorizes those districts to levy and impose various taxes and fees to generate revenues to support transportation improvements that benefit the district and that are consistent with state, regional or local transportation plans and necessitated by existing or reasonably foreseeable congestion levels; and WHEREAS, City of Seattle Ordinance established the Seattle Transportation Benefit District (STBD) for preserving and maintaining transportation infrastructure, improving public safety, implementing elements of the Seattle Transportation Strategic Plan and other planning documents, investing in bicycle, pedestrian, freight mobility and transit enhancements and providing people with choices to meet their mobility needs; and WHEREAS, the City of Seattle and the STBD entered into an interlocal agreement in delineating roles and responsibilities and coordinating efforts to pursue each municipal needs of the City of Seattle; and WHEREAS, a Transportation Benefit District may authorize a twenty-dollar vehicle license fee (VLF) pursuant to RCW A.; and WHEREAS, a Transportation Benefit District may authorize a one hundred-dollar VLF pursuant to RCW A. with approval of a majority of Transportation Benefit District voters; and WHEREAS, the STBD adopted Resolution, authorizing a twenty-dollar VLF; and WHEREAS, in the last several years, new transportation challenges have emerged, including a prolonged recession, declining general fund and gas-tax receipts, and new statutory obligations;

August 0, 0 WHEREAS, the City of Seattle adopted Resolution 0 on September, 0 creating the Citizens Transportation Advisory Committee III (CTAC-III) for the express purpose of advising the Mayor and the City Council on transportation funding alternatives and priorities; and WHEREAS, CTAC-III has convened thirteen times since being created to conduct open, public meetings; CTAC-III has solicited input from the public about preferences and priorities for potential new transportation funding needs and options in a variety of ways including but not limited to conducting a statistically valid telephone survey, an on-line survey, three widely advertised public open house workshops; and WHEREAS, CTAC-III has concluded its work by presenting a proposal for funding priorities to be supported by a ballot measure that if approved by voters would provide approximately $. million annually for transportation purposes by increasing the existing VLF by $0 per vehicle per year from the existing $ per vehicle per year to a total of $00 per vehicle per year; and WHEREAS, Council Bill established a Bridging the Gap Oversight Committee to monitor City revenues, expenditures, and program and project implementation, and to advise the City Council, the Mayor and the Seattle Department of Transportation on transportation issues; and WHEREAS, the STBD has concluded that the best approach for ensuring accountability and oversight of an increased Vehicle License Fee is to establish a fixed term of ten years during which the Vehicle License Fee will be collected and progress can be evaluated in meeting the goals established for use of the revenues; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SEATTLE TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT: Section. The City Clerk is directed promptly to certify to the Director of Records and Elections of King County, Washington, as ex officio Supervisor of Elections, a copy of this resolution and the proposition to be submitted at the November,, special election in the form of a ballot title as follows, or as modified by the King County Prosecuting Attorney pursuant to his duties under RCW A..0: SEATTLE TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT Form last revised on //0

August 0, 0 PROPOSITION NO. The Proposition concerns an increased Vehicle License Fee for transportation improvements. If approved, this proposition would fund transportation facilities and services benefitting the City of Seattle, including: street and bridge repairs and maintenance; transit infrastructure improvements to increase speed, reliability and access; and pedestrian, bicycle and freight mobility programs as provided for in STBD Resolution [ ]. It would authorize a $0 increase in the Vehicle License Fee beginning in, allowing collection of approximately $. million annually for ten years. Should this Vehicle License Fee be approved? Vehicle License Fee, Yes Vehicle License Fee, No Section. Pursuant to RCW A..0, the following three persons are designated to be on the committee to draft for the King County local vot the argument advocating passage of STBD Proposition : Form last revised on //0

August 0, 0 Section the City of Seattle, is requested to draft an explanatory statement for the King County local Section. Transportation Improvements will occur in three categories: () Transportation System Repair, Maintenance and Safety; () Transit Speed, Reliability and Access Improvements; and () Pedestrian, Bicycle and Freight Mobility. Conditioned upon voter approval of the ballot proposition submitted by this resolution, proceeds from the $0 Vehicle License Fee shall be allocated on a cumulative basis during the ten-year period as follows: A. Approximately twenty-nine percent (%) will be allocated for Transportation System Repair, Maintenance and Safety consistent with the Seattle Department of Asset Management Plan and Transportation Strategic Plan; B. Approximately forty-nine percent (%) will be allocated for implementing Transit Speed, Reliability and Access Improvements projects and programs included in the Seattle Transit Plan, or its potential successor the Transit Master Plan, to improve speed, reliability and access; and C. Approximately twenty-two percent (%) will be allocated for implementing Pedestrian, Bicycle and Freight Mobility projects and programs included in the City Pedestrian Master Plan, the Bicycle Master Plan, and the development of a Freight Master Plan. Form last revised on //0

August 0, 0 Section. The STBD expects that revenues from the increased Vehicle License Fee will be generally consistent with Planned Spending Priorities, included as Attachment A to this Resolution. Section. Conditioned upon voter approval of the ballot proposition submitted by this resolution: (a) The STBD requests that the City of Seattle create a new Seattle Transportation Oversight Committee to provide and project priorities, spending and revised financial plans. (b) The STBD requests that the Seattle Transportation Oversight Committee consider whether to make recommendations to the STBD Board regarding the spending of STBD revenues. (c) The STBD requests that the membership of the Seattle Transportation Oversight Committee be the same as that of the Bridging the Gap Oversight Committee as set forth in Seattle Ordinance, and that the Seattle Transportation Oversight Committee be subject to the same provisions in that ordinance relating to the adoption of rules for its procedures, staff and logistical support, members serving without pay, reimbursement for member expenses and the length of its existence. Section. The STBD anticipates that annual allocations of the $0 Vehicle License Fee revenues will be determined in annual budgets or in separate resolutions, subject to the restrictions imposed in Section and after considering any recommendations that may have been made by the Seattle Transportation Oversight Committee. Form last revised on //0

August 0, 0 Section s review and approval in ding plan shall: (a) Adhere to the Percentage Allocations identified in this Resolution; and (b) Support and implement the goals of the Initiative. Section ould: (a) Identify whether the proposed annual spending plan is substantially consistent with the lan is not substantially consistent with the Percentage Allocations, SDOT shall provide a narrative explaining the rationale for the proposal and either (a) a plan for spending allocations in future years that will on balance lead to a cumulative allocation substantially consistent with the Percentage Allocations or (b) a proposal and rationale for the STBD to consider adopting new Percentage Allocations consistent with Section 0 of this Resolution. (b) Identify whether the proposed annual spending plan together with cumulative actual spending from previous years (if any) is substantially consistent with the Percentage cumulative actual spending from previous years (if any) is not substantially consistent with the Percentage Allocations, SDOT shall provide a narrative explaining the rationale for the proposal and either (a) a plan for spending allocations in future years that will on Form last revised on //0

August 0, 0 balance lead to a cumulative allocation substantially consistent with the Percentage Allocations or (b) a proposal and rationale for the STBD to consider adopting new Percentage Allocations consistent with Section 0 of this Resolution. (c) Include a narrative describing the particular projects that will be supported in each category of expenditure and identifying how these projects support and implement the The narrative should clearly identify whether and how projects were selected to support and improve transportation infrastructure and programs for economically disadvantaged residents of the City of Seattle. Section 0. The STBD may act to change the Percentage Allocations for cumulative allocations through a majority vote held during a public meeting of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District Board. The STBD may act to change the Planned Spending Priorities through a majority vote held during a public meeting of the Seattle Transportation Benefit District Board. Adopted by the Seattle Transportation Benefit District the day of,, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its adoption this day of,. Chair of the STBD Board Filed by me this day of,. City Clerk Form last revised on //0

August 0, (Seal) ATTACHMENT A: Planned Spending Priorities 0 Form last revised on //0

Attachment A - Transportation Benefit District (TBD) - $0 Vehicle License Fee (VLF) 0- Year Spending Plan TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM INVESTMENT AREA Total System Repair, Maintenance and Safety Improvements Pavement Preservation $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $0,000,000 Traffic Safety $,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,000 $,00,000 Category Subtotal: $,0,000 $,00,000 Transit Speed, Reliability and Access Improvements Transit Master Plan Bus Corridor Speed and Reliability Improvements $,00,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,00,000 Planning, alternatives analysis, environmental review, design and possible matching funds for construction for () connecting the First Hill streetcar to the South Lake Union streetcar and () extending the First Hill streetcar to Aloha St. $00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $,00,000 $00,000 $,000,000 Electric Trolley Bus Expansion Projects $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 Transit Access Projects $00,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $,000,000 $00,000 $0,000,000 Neighborhood Transit Connections Fund $00,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $00,000 $,000,000 Category Subtotal: $0,000,000 $,00,000 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Freight Mobility Improvements Neighborhood Street Fund $0,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $00,000 $0,000 $,000,000 Safety and Access Projects $,,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,0,000 $,,000 $,00,000 Freight Mobility Plan $00,000 $00,000 Category Subtotal: $,0,000 $,00,000 0- Year $0 VLF Total: $,00,000 $,000,000 Note: This spending plan assumes a ten- year period of VLF collection starting in July and ending in June. file: 0 Attachment A - 0- Year Spending Plan for $0 VLF for.xlsx