December 31 st, décembre 2015

Similar documents
Life Insurance Companies Portfolio Summary Overview

Percentiles One way to look at quartile points is to say that, for a sorted list of values, Q 1 is the value that has 25% of the rest of the values

September 30, 2013

F 10 STANDING COMMITTEES. Finance and Asset Management Committee. Comparative Performance and Asset Allocation INFORMATION

Respondent name: Sample Health Care Company name: Info-Tech Respondant Executive Summary

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 6-1

AAP LIFE SETTLEMENT MARKET REVIEW

Chapter 3 Descriptive Statistics: Numerical Measures Part A

Applications of Data Dispersions

Statistical Literacy & Data Analysis

Tactical Money Management-- Strategy Overviews and Forecasting 2016

D ATA PA C K Full Year Results JUPITER FUND MANAGEMENT PLC

2017 Investment Management Fee Survey

Some estimates of the height of the podium

Investment Cost Effectiveness Analysis Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global

Asset Allocation and Fund Performance of U.S. Defined Benefit Pension Plans ( )

Financial Report. Prepared for presentation to the Board of Trustees. March 15, 2018

Percentiles, STATA, Box Plots, Standardizing, and Other Transformations

Chapter 4-Describing Data: Displaying and Exploring Data

F 5 STANDING COMMITTEE. B. Finance and Audit Committee. Quarterly Investment Report, 1 st Quarter FY05. See Attached F 5/211 11/18/04

Actuarial Joke of the Day

Descriptive Statistics

Endowment 101. Gary Barnes, Vice Chancellor and CFO. June 26, 2017

This benchmarking report compares your cost and return performance to CEM's extensive pension database.

International Fund Awards Methodology, Malaysia

Building Hedge Fund Portfolios Capable of Generating Absolute Return within Stressful Market Environments

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

Today s plan: Section 4.1.4: Dispersion: Five-Number summary and Standard Deviation.

Norwegian Government Pension Fund - Global Investment Benchmarking Results For the 5 year period ending December 2009

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

International Fund Awards Methodology, Norway

State Board of Administration

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Tail Factors for Loss Development

Pension Crisis and Solutions. Ryan ALM, Inc. - The Solutions Company RyanALM

Senior Director, Research and Policy Analysis

Investment Management Services

D ATA PA C K Full Year Results JUPITER FUND MANAGEMENT PLC

Man Group Stock Performance. US$ Per Share 35

U.T. System Board of Regents Report on Investments Fiscal Quarter Ending May 31, 2004

Exploratory Data Analysis

MeasureIT Benchmarking Report IT Budgeting Metrics

Chapter 4-Describing Data: Displaying and Exploring Data

Romero Catholic Academy Gender Pay Reporting Findings

SUMMARY STATISTICS EXAMPLES AND ACTIVITIES

Chapter 3. Lecture 3 Sections

Minnesota State Board of Investment. Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement

Margin Management Tools. Commodity & Ingredient Hedging, LLC

The Range, the Inter Quartile Range (or IQR), and the Standard Deviation (which we usually denote by a lower case s).

UK Portfolio Barometer

Lecture 07: Measures of central tendency

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE SURVEY OF CANADIAN INSTITUTIONAL POOLED FUNDS SUMMARY

Published May As of March 31, 2008 F-4

SIX Corporate Bonds AG. Directive 3: Trading. Dated 16 March 2018 Entry into force: 27 March 2018

Week 1 Variables: Exploration, Familiarisation and Description. Descriptive Statistics.

Investment Cost Effectiveness Analysis (for the 5 years ending December 31, 2017) New Zealand Superannuation Fund

Sources of Hedge Fund Returns: Alphas, Betas, Costs & Biases. Outline

Private Motor Insurance Statistics

Fund Structure Trustee Educational Seminar. You re a New Trustee. Now What?

Risk and Return: Past and Prologue

2013 Hedge Fund. Compensation Report SAMPLE REPORT

F1 Results. News vs. no-news

Labor Supply and Taxation in Europe

Social trends and dynamics of poverty and social exclusion. ESDE conference Brussels 06/02/2013

Presentation of the AREF/IPD UK Quarterly Property Fund Index (UK PFI)

Chapter 3. Numerical Descriptive Measures. Copyright 2016 Pearson Education, Ltd. Chapter 3, Slide 1

line of Sight October 2015

Montana Board of Investments. CEM Benchmarking Results

2014 Active Management Review March 24, 2015

International Fund Awards Methodology, Italy

2014/2015 Survey of Results and Assumptions for Actuarial Valuations of Defined Benefit Schemes in accordance with

20 Years of School Funding Post-DeRolph Ohio Education Policy Institute August 2018

2013 Annual Report of the Investment Committee

Handout 4 numerical descriptive measures part 2. Example 1. Variance and Standard Deviation for Grouped Data. mf N 535 = = 25

Who Is a Top Earner and For How Long? Top Income Mobility in Switzerland

Legg Mason, Inc. Second Quarter FY 2010 Review October 22, 2009

Chapter 15: Graphs, Charts, and Numbers Math 107

International Fund Awards Methodology, South Africa

2010 Annual Report of the Investment Committee

BOSTON PRIVATE: A National Wealth Management Franchise

Features of Korean Hedge Funds and Their Implications

Session 5: Associations

Presentation to University of South Florida Board of Trustees

Board of Trustees. Budget Update 04/13/2012

GOALS. Describing Data: Displaying and Exploring Data. Dot Plots - Examples. Dot Plots. Dot Plot Minitab Example. Stem-and-Leaf.

Compensation of Executive Board Members in European Health Care Companies. HCM Health Care

UWINCO Investment Performance Quarterly Report Quarter Ended December 31, 2017

Pension and Savings Program Investment Review as of December 31, 2017

Historical Pricing PJM COMED, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Measures of Center. Mean. 1. Mean 2. Median 3. Mode 4. Midrange (rarely used) Measure of Center. Notation. Mean

Credit Suisse Swiss Pension Fund Index Q1 2017

Per capita represents the average amount or value per person, such as per capita income. Per capita figures are to make comparisons.

BOYNTON BEACH POLICE PENSION FUND INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2013

Government Pension Fund Norway Investment Benchmarking Results For the 5 year period ending December 2011

BOSTON PRIVATE: A National Wealth Management Franchise

Income and Longevity: Implications for Retirement and Disability Programs

Description of Data I

2016 FINANCIAL COMPENSATION SURVEY FINDINGS AND RESULTS. November 2016

Describing Data: Displaying and Exploring Data

2018 FINANCIAL COMPENSATION SURVEY FINDINGS AND RESULTS NOVEMBER 2018

Historical Pricing PJM PSEG, Around the Clock. Cal '15 Cal '16 Cal '17 Cal '18 Cal '19 Cal '20 Cal '21 Cal '22

Transcription:

December 31 st, 2015 31 décembre 2015 1

2015 Endowment survey Highlights HIGHLIGHTS Total Asset Growth since 2008 ENDOWMENTS 88 % of total assets Median 2015 return 5,0 % Median 2015 10 yrs annualized return Median return by fund size : 1 yr Median return by fund size : 10 yrs Main asset allocation divergence by fund size Total allocation to Equity Total allocation to Alternative Alternative investment main allocation 6,0 % Advantage 1st quartile 7,3 % vs 4th quartile 2,7 % Advantage 1st quartile 6,6 % vs 4th quartile 5,0 % 1st quartile : lowest into bond highest into alternative 4th quartile : the exact opposite Reducing by -2,1 % Increasing by 1,9 % Mostly seen into 1st quartile : Real Estate 7,4 % Hedged Funds 7,3 % 2

Survey Statistics - Endowments 72 Participants (Endowment) 67 69 67 67 66 64 68 66 68 69 Stable 61 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year 7.9 Total Endowment Assets Under Management ($ billions) 9.0 10.4 10.9 8.7 10.8 11.0 10.8 12.1 14.0 15.3 Total = 18,4 Endowment = 16,4 88 % of total assets growth since 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year 3

Changes to the funds sub-grouping : Endowment Quartiles Fund sub-groups are now based on quartiles : To keep an even number of funds per group : Endowments Quartiles 2014 2015 1st = 25 th largest funds Above $ 220 M Above $ 300 M 2 nd = 25 th next largest $ 55 M to $ 220 M $ 80 M to $ 300 M 3rd = 25 th next $ 20 M to $ 55 M $ 25 M to $ 80 M 4th = 25 th smallest Below $ 20 M Below $ 25 M For historical comparison, I suggest that we match the new quartiles grouping to each sub-groups definitions we used prior to 2015 we used to separate funds based on a static value of assets under management Endowments subgroups 2014 sub-groups definitions 2015 quartile definitions Group 1 = 1 st quartile Above $ 100 M Above $ 300 M Group 2 = 2 nd quartile $ 30 M to $ 100 M $ 80 M to $ 300 M Group 3 = 3 rd quartile $ 10 M to $ 30 M $ 25 M to $ 80 M Group 4 = 4 th quartile Below $ 10 M Below $ 25 M 4

2015 Endowment: Average Asset Allocation (Dollar Weighted within each Group) December 2015 - in quartiles by fund size 70.0% 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 4th Quartile 3rd Quartile 2nd Quartile 1st Quartile Equity 49.8% 62.8% 60.9% 55.0% Alternatif 7.3% 3.5% 5.2% 22.7% Bond 38.2% 29.0% 29.5% 21.0% Cash 4.7% 4.7% 4.4% 1.3% Equity Alternatif Bond Cash 1 st quartile is > $ 300 M 2 nd quartile is $ 80 to 300 M 3 rd quartile is $ 25 to 80 M 4 th quartile is < $ 25 M 5

2003 Endowment: Average Asset Allocation (Dollar Weighted within each Group) December 2003 - in quartiles by fund size 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 - smallest 25% med-small med-large largest 25% Equity 41.3 53.9 55.8 60.1 Alternative - 0.2 2.3 8.2 Fixed Income 45.9 42.3 36.4 29.5 Cash 12.9 3.6 5.5 2.3 Equity Alternative Fixed Income Cash 6

Compare Asset Allocation Endowments : 2015 vs 2014 Endowments 2015 2014 Changes Equity 56,1% 58,1% -2,1% Alternative 19,3% 17,4% 1,9% Fixed Income 22,7% 22,7% 0,0% Cash 1,9% 1,8% 0,1% Total 100,0% 100,0% 0,0% 7

December 2015 Alternative Investment profile Total Asset by Endowment Quartiles % of total AUM 1 st quartile 2 nd quartile 3 rd quartile 4 th quartile Real Estate 1 144 495 6,2% 1 056 308 60 989 18 535 8 663 Hedge Funds 1 120 692 6,1% 1 080 407 33 501 6 784 Private Equity 653 153 3,5% 650 566 2 586 Others 560 332 3,0% 519 140 32 538 2 107 6 547 Commodity 76 441 0,4% 76 441 Total Alternative 3 555 113 19,3% 3 382 863 127 028 30 012 15 211 Weights vs sub-total 22,7 % 5,2 % 3,5 % 7,3 % Weights vs total allocation to the asset class 95,2 % 3,6 % 0,8 % 0,4 % Total Assets 18 420 497 14 902 126 2 440 722 870 398 207 251 Weights vs Total Asset 18,4 % 0,7 % 0,2 % 0,1 % December 2014 Alternative Investment profile by Endowment size Total Asset % of total AUM > 100 millions $ > $30 Million to $100 Million > $10 Million to $30 Million $10 Million Real Estate 973 390 6,3% 908 269 54 842 10 279 Hedge Funds 969 656 6,3% 951 166 18 490 Private Equity 467 801 3,1% 466 368 1 433 Others 413 376 2,7% 370 420 35 470 7 486 Commodity 90 074 0,6% 90 074 Total Alternative 2 914 296 19,0 % 2 786 296 110 235 17 765 0 Weights vs total allocation to the asset class 95,6 % 3,8 % 0,6 % 0,0 % Weights vs sub-total 20,5 % 7,3 % 10,6 % 0,0 % Total Assets 15 329 200 13 598 682 1 512 927 167 223 50 368 Weights vs Total Asset 18,2 % 0,7 % 0,1 % 0,0 % 8

Endowment - Historical Annual Returns for each year, ending December 31 st 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 5,0 % 0.0% -10.0% -20.0% 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile -30.0% 9

2015 Annual Return Distribution by Endowment Quartiles 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 26.1% High Median Low 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% -5.0% 7.3% 2.2% 11.6% 4.9% 9.5% 5.4% 1.0% 8.8% 2.7% -2.6% Overall median = 5,0 % -10.0% -10.4% -15.0% 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile 10

Historical Median One Year Returns by Endowment Quartiles 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile Year 11

Endowment - Annualized Returns (December 31 st, 2015) 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 11.2% 10.6% 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile 8.0% 7.8% 8.6% 6.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 2.0% 0.0% 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 10 Year 12

16.0% 14.0% 12.0% Endowment - Historical Ten Year Annualized Returns for each period, ending December 31 st 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 6,0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 13

2015 Ten Year Returns Distribution by Endowment Quartiles 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 13.1% High Median Low 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 7.6% 7.7% 6.6% 6.2% 5.7% 4.5% 4.4% 4.4% 6.9% 5.0% Overall median = 6,0 % 2.0% 1.4% 0.0% 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile 14

December 31 st, 2015 31 décembre 2015 15

2015 Pension survey Highlights HIGHLIGHTS Total Asset Growth since 2008 PENSIONS 66 % of total assets Median 2015 return 6,2 % Median 2015 10 yrs annualized return Median return by fund size : 1 yr Median return by fund size : 10 yrs Main asset allocation divergence by fund size Total allocation to Equity Total allocation to Alternative Alternative investment main allocation 6,3 % Advantage 1st quartile 7,4 % vs 4th quartile 4,5 % Advantage 1st quartile 6,8 % vs 4th quartile 6,0 % 1st quartile : lowest into equity highest into alternative 4th quartile : the exact opposite Reducing by -1,9 % Increasing by 1,6 % Mostly seen into 1st quartile : Real Estate 5,8 % Hedged Funds 3,3 % 16

Survey Statistics 54 52 57 55 Participants (Pension) 56 54 56 55 56 54 Stable 50 50 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year 25.4 Total Pension Assets Under Management ($ billions) 34.4 34.3 34.4 35.4 30.1 31.3 31.4 28.1 44.5 39.4 46.7 66 % of total assets growth since 2008 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year 17

Changes to the funds sub-grouping : Pension Quartiles Fund sub-groups are now based on quartiles to keep an even number of funds per group : Pensions Quartiles 2014 2015 1st = 25 th largest funds Above $ 1 250 M Above $ 1 256 M 2 nd = 25 th next largest $ 355 M to $ 1 250 M $ 370 M to $ 1 256 M 3rd = 25 th next $ 123 M to $ 355 M $ 150 M to $ 370 M 4th = 25 th smallest Below $ 123 M Below $ 150 M For historical comparison, I suggest that we match the new quartiles grouping to each sub-groups definitions we used prior to 2015 we used to separate funds based on a static value of assets under management Pensions Quartiles 2014 sub-group definitions 2015 quartile definitions 1st = 25 th largest funds Above $ 500 M Above $ 1 256 M 2 nd = 25 th next largest $ 150 M to $ 500 M $ 370 M to $ 1 256 M 3rd = 25 th next $ 30 M to $ 150 M $ 150 M to $ 370 M 4th = 25 th smallest Below $ 30 M Below $ 150 M 18

2015 70.0% Pension: Average Asset Allocation Dollar Weighted within each Group December 2015 - in quartiles by fund size 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 4th quartile 3rd quartile 2nd quartile 1st quartile Equity 61.6% 55.6% 54.5% 47.6% Alternative 4.1% 5.9% 12.0% 18.1% Fixed Income 31.2% 36.3% 32.5% 31.8% Cash 3.2% 2.2% 1.1% 2.5% Equity Alternative Fixed Income Cash 1 st quartile is > $ 1 256 M 2 nd quartile is $ 370 to 1 256 M 3 rd quartile is $ 150 to 370 M 4 th quartile is < $ 150 M 19

2003 70.0 Pension: Average Asset Allocation Dollar Weighted within each Group December 2003 - in quartiles by fund size 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 - smallest 25% med-small med-large largest 25% Equity 60.8 63.2 59.9 56.9 Alternative 1.4 0.2 2.3 3.5 Fixed Income 34.1 34.1 35.2 37.6 Cash 3.7 2.5 2.6 2.0 20

Compare Asset Allocation Pensions : 2015 vs 2014 Pensions 2015 2014 Changes Equity 50,2% 52,1% -1,9% Alternative 15,4% 13,8% 1,6% Fixed Income 32,3% 31,9% 0,4% Cash 2,1% 2,3% -0,2% Total 100,0% 100,0% 0,0% 21

December 2015 Alternative investment profile by Pension size Total Asset % of total AUM 1 st quartile 2 nd quartile 3 rd quartile 4 th quartile Real Estate 2 520 403 5,4% 1 757 716 563 788 172 431 26 468 Hedge Funds 1 282 313 2,7% 1 010 132 272 181 Private Equity 1 142 784 2,4% 867 127 275 656 Others 2 086 137 4,5% 1 722 985 331 853 26 853 4 446 Commodity 154 480 0,3% 152 658 1 822 Total Alternative 7 186 117 15,40% 5 510 618 1 445 301 199 284 30 914 Weights vs total allocation to the asset class 76,7% 20,1% 2,8% 0,4% Weights vs sub-group 18,1 % 12,0 % 5,9 % 4,1 % Total Asset 46 701 500 30 523 082 12 040 944 3 384 830 752 644 Weights vs Total Asset 11,8% 3,1% 0,4% 0,1% December 2014 Alternative investment profile by Pension size Total Asset % of total AUM Pension > 500 millions $ Pension > $150 Million to $500 Million Pension > $30 Million to $150 Million Pension $30 Million Real Estate 2 052 935 4,6% 1 803 378 224 958 24 599 Hedge Funds 1 613 684 3,6% 1 580 880 32 804 Others 1 337 212 3,0% 1 309 862 27 350 0 Private Equity 693 291 1,6% 693 204 87 Commodity 202 955 0,5% 202 955 Total Alternative 5 900 077 13,3 % 5 590 279 285 199 24 599 0 Weights vs total allocation to the asset class 94,7% 4,8% 0,4% 0,0% Weights vs sub-group 14,4 % 5,9 % 2,7 % 0,0 % Total Asset 44 659 562 38 783 316 4 808 554 926 309 189 987 Weights vs Total Assets 12,6% 0,6% 0,1% 0,0% 22

Pension - Historical Annual Returns for each year, ending December 31 st 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 6,2 % -10.0% -20.0% 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile -30.0% 23

2015 Annual Return Distribution by Pension Quartiles 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 10.2% 7.4% 9.3% 6.2% 10.2% 6.0% 7.4% High Median Low Overall median = 6,2 % 4.0% 3.0% 3.9% 3.2% 4.5% 2.0% 0.0% -0.2% -2.0% 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile 24

Historical Median One Year Returns by Pension Quartiles 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Year 25

14.0% Pensions - Annualized Returns (December 31 st, 2015) 12.0% 10.0% 10.7% 10.5% 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile 8.0% 8.4% 8.6% 6.0% 6.2% 6.3% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 10 Year 26

Pensions - Ten Year Annualized Returns for each period, ending December 31 st 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 10th percentile 25th percentile Median 75th percentile 90th percentile 8.0% 6.0% 6,3 % 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 27

2015 Ten Year Returns Distribution by Pension Quartiles 14.0% 12.0% High Median Low 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 7.3% 7.4% 6.8% 6.4% 5.5% 4.7% 6.9% 6.2% 4.7% 7.2% 6.0% 3.8% Overall median = 6,3 % 2.0% 0.0% 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile 28

2015 Investment Survey Highlights HIGHLIGHTS PENSIONS ENDOWMENTS Total Asset Growth since 2008 66 % of total assets 88 % of total assets Median 2015 return 6,2 % 5,0 % Median 2015 10 yrs annualized return 6,3 % 6,0 % Median return by fund size : 1 yr Median return by fund size : 10 yrs Main asset allocation divergence by fund size Total allocation to Equity Total allocation to Alternative Alternative investment main allocation Advantage 1st quartile 7,4 % vs 4th quartile 4,5 % Advantage 1st quartile 6,8 % vs 4th quartile 6,0 % 1st quartile : lowest into equity highest into alternative 4th quartile : the exact opposite Reducing by -1,9 % Increasing by 1,6 % Mostly seen into 1st quartile : Real Estate 5,8 % Hedge Funds 3,3 % Advantage 1st quartile 7,3 % vs 4th quartile 2,7 % Advantage 1st quartile 6,6 % vs 4th quartile 5,0 % 1st quartile : lowest into bond highest into alternative 4th quartile : the exact opposite Reducing by -2,1 % Increasing by 1,9 % Mostly seen into 1st quartile : Real Estate 7,4 % Hedge Funds 7,3 % 29