AHLA. W. Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition. Tony R. Maida McDermott Will & Emery LLP New York, NY. Catherine A. Martin Ober Kaler Baltimore, MD

Similar documents
Physician Rockstars Toolkit - Common Models and Legal Considerations for Securing the Services of Rockstar physicians. Item 3

The Impact of the Finalized Modifications to the Stark Law

Complying With New 2016 Stark Law Amendments

UNDERSTANDING AND WORKING WITH THE LATEST STARK LAW DEVELOPMENTS

Stark, AKS, FCA Primer

PHASE II OF THE FINAL STARK REGULATIONS: WHAT DO THEY MEAN FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

Complying With 2016 Stark Law Amendments and Possible Changes in the Horizon for 2017

Physician Lease Arrangements: New Rules

Stark and the Anti Kickback Statute. Regulating Referral Relationship. February 27-28, HCCA Board Audit Committee Compliance Conference.

Stark Law Making the Confusion Understandable

Impact of Stark II, Phase II Regulations on Existing and Future Hospital/Physician Arrangements

FY 2009 IPPS Rule. Recent Stark Developments. Recent Stark Developments. Edwin Rauzi Partner Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Seattle, WA

WHAT EVERY NEW PRACTITIONER SHOULD CONSIDER

A Conversation About Stark

PROPOSED STARK LAW REVISIONS COULD AFFECT MANY EXISTING BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS AND OTHER PROVIDERS

How to Determine Commercial Reasonableness of Hospital- Physician Compensation Arrangements

Stark Law Exceptions and Anti-Kickback Safe Harbors

Physician Relationship Compliance Issues

Physician Relationship Compliance Issues. Charles Oppenheim Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC

Compensation Paid by Healthcare Providers

Auditing Physician Arrangements

Investigator Compensation: Motivation vs. Regulatory Compliance

N R a v e n s w o o d A v e, S t e C h i c a g o, I L w w w. a e g i s - c o m p l i a n c e.

Overview of Phase III Final Rule for Federal Physician Self-Referral (Stark) Law. Table of Contents

Ober Kaler Health Law Client Alert

ANCILLARY services: How to Stay Out of Trouble. The neurosurgical minefield Informed consent

PHYSICIAN PRACTICES IN A STARK WORLD. David E. Matyas. A. The Statutory Prohibition (Social Security Act 1877; 42 U.S.C. 1395nn)

Hancock, Daniel & Johnson, P.C., P.O. Box 72050, Richmond, VA , ,

Law Department Policy No. L-8. Title:

AHLA. A. Stark Law Primer. Troy A. Barsky Crowell & Moring LLP Washington, DC

Gainsharing Is it Still Feasible? May 14, 2010

Gifts to Referral Sources. Kim C. Stanger (11-17)

PHYSICIAN ALIGNMENT: LEGAL AND FAIR MARKET VALUE COMPLIANCE

Hospital Incentive Payments to Physicians for Quality and Cost Savings

4/1/2014. Proof of Intent is Not Required

Organization. 4 Health Texas Senior Centers. VP, Internal Audit Team of 11 Auditors

Structuring Physician Timeshare Arrangements: Leveraging the New Stark Exception, Navigating the Limitations

Why Physicians and Physician Organizations Should be Concerned about Stark Compliance

COMMERCIAL REASONABLENESS AND FINANCIAL ARRANGEMENTS WITH PHYSICIANS

FRAUD AND ABUSE LAW IMPLICATED BY COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS. Lee Rosebush, PharmD, RPh, MBA, JD

FAST BREAK : HOLIDAY GIFTS Jake Harper December 18, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

7/25/2018. Government Enforcement in the Clinical Laboratory Space. The Statutes & Regulations. The Stark Law. The Stark Law.

Anti-Kickback Statute Jess Smith

Summary of Presentation

Provider and Provider Relationships. Primary Fraud and Abuse Issues

Compliance in Physician Employment and Hospital- Physician Integration

2014 Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP Lathrop & Gage LLP

Leah Guidry, Managing Director, Huron Consulting Group Lisa Ohrin, Esq., Partner, Katten Muchin Rosenman

HCCA Compliance Institute Dallas, Texas Session 401- Monday, April 19, 2010

Practical Considerations for Medical Practices Considering Converting Their Vascular Access Centers Into Medicare-Certified Ambulatory Surgery Centers

AHLA. U. Physician Relationship Audit Workshop: A Practical Guide to Auditing Physician Relationships and Addressing Identified Issues

Final Rule for Phase III of the Stark Regulation

Legal Issues: Fraud and Abuse Navigating Stark and Kickback. Reece Hirsch, Esq. Jordana Schwartz, Esq. HIT Summit West March 7, 2005

AHLA. CC. Cutting Edge Stark Issues. Julie E. Kass OBER KALER Washington, DC. David E. Matyas Epstein Becker & Green PC Washington, DC

Health Law 101: Issue-Spotting In Dealing With Health-Care Providers. by William H. Hall Jr.

HEALTH CARE FRAUD. EXPERT ANALYSIS HHS OIG Adopts New Anti-Kickback Safe Harbor and Civil Monetary Penalty Exceptions

Stark Law Contracting Tips and Problem-Solving May 14, 2015

Stark/Anti- Kickback Fundamentals

appendix B physician self-referral exceptions 4/13

Stark Self-Disclosure. Thomas S. Crane 1/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC

Proposed ACO Rule: A Giant Step Toward Reform or a Leap of Faith for Providers? April 27, 2011

MARSHALL L. MATZ MARK L. ITZKOFF *PRACTICE WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IS LIMITED TO MATTERS AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE FEDERAL COURTS AND AGENCIES

LIFEBLOOD OF THE SUCCESSFUL PHARMACY: MARKETING, JOINT VENTURES, AND ARRANGEMENTS WITH REFERRAL SOURCES WHILE REMAINING WITHIN LEGAL PARAMETERS

Fundamentals and Practicalities of Identifying and Returning Overpayments

Physician Care: Physician Compensation. Presented by Albert R. Riviezzo, Esq. Fox Rothschild LLP Exton, PA

(2017 Update) By R. Gregory Cochran, Nossaman LLP

Check Your Physician Contracts

HOSPITAL COMPLIANCE POTENTIAL IMPLICATION OF FRAUD AND ABUSE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR HOSPITALS

The Anti-Kickback Statute. May 3, 2013 Tennessee Hospice Organization Compliance Forum

Deciphering the Self-Disclosure Puzzle

Stark Prevention A Practical Approach to Physician Transactions. Paul Belton, VP Corporate Compliance Sharp Healthcare

Fraud and Abuse Primer Hypotheticals

42 USC 1395nn. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Physician Contracting An Overview of Legal Policy No. 9

Certifying Employee Training Navicent Health s Corporate Integrity Agreement Year Two

MANAGING HOSPITAL/PHYSICIAN FINANCIAL RELATIONSHIPS

2012 Health Law Education Program: Anatomy of a Self- Disclosure Telling CMS About Your Stark Law Problems

Beyond the Cover Story Part 2: The Final ACO Regulations November 9, 2011

Stark Self-Disclosure 1/ Thomas S. Crane 2/ Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, PC

42 CFR Ch. IV ( Edition)

This Webcast Will Begin Shortly

STARK LAW BASICS Presented by The American Bar Association Health Law Section, Young Lawyers Division and the

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Office of Inspector General s Use of Agreements to Protect the Integrity of Federal Health Care Programs

Introduction & Overview

Supplemental Special Advisory Bulletin: Independent Charity. Patients who cannot afford their cost-sharing obligations

Laissez les Bons Temps Rouler: Hope for Potential Stark Law Changes

HEALTHCARE BULLETIN. July 8, 2008 CMS PROPOSES NEW STARK EXCEPTION FOR INCENTIVE PAYMENT AND SHARED SERVICES PROGRAMS

Federal Fraud and Abuse Enforcement in the ASC Space

Avoiding an October Surprise: Strategies for Complying with the New Stark Law Rules

Life Sciences Health Industry Group

Contracting With Research Sites And Investigators: A Fraud And Abuse Primer

Telemedicine Fraud and Abuse Under the Microscope

Building a Strategic Plan for Physician Employment and Practice Acquisition

ISDN. Over the course of the last couple of years, the National Association. Recent Developments in Federal Tax, Antitrust and Fraud and Abuse Law

Stark Update HCCA Hawaii Conference

COMPENSATING EMPLOYED PHYSICIANS Tax Law, Stark and Anti-Kickback Implications. AHLA Tax Issues for Healthcare Organizations October 20-22, 2013

RUC Practice Expense Recommendations. Proposed Non- Facility

Fraud and Abuse Laws. Kim C. Stanger. Compliance Bootcamp (5/18)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Have Financial Relationships: Exception for Certain Electronic Health Records

Ohio Hospital Association 2014 Annual Meeting. Compensating Employed Physicians In An Evolving Health Care Environment

Transcription:

AHLA W. Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition Tony R. Maida McDermott Will & Emery LLP New York, NY Catherine A. Martin Ober Kaler Baltimore, MD Lisa Ohrin Wilson Senior Technical Advisor Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Windsor Mill, MD Fraud and Compliance Forum September 27-29, 2015

Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition American Health Lawyers Association Fraud & Compliance Forum September 28 & 29, 2015 Tony Maida McDermott Will & Emery Catherine Martin Ober Kaler Lisa Ohrin Wilson Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Disclaimers The views expressed today are those of the speakers in their personal capacities and not the official position(s) of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services or any other governmental agency; Ober Kaler or its clients; or McDermott Will & Emery or its clients. 2 1

Today s Presentation Remuneration: What is and what is not remuneration? The intricacies of nonmonetary compensation Recruitment and retention: Anomalies and roadblocks Challenging compliance issues: office space, rental charges, rural providers, and more Clarifications and proposals from the CY 2016 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule 80 Fed. Reg. 41686 (Jul. 15, 2015) 3 Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition 4 2

Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition 5 Remuneration Any payment or other benefit made directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind Exceptions Forgiveness of amounts owed for inaccurate tests or procedures, mistakenly performed tests or procedures, or the correction of minor billing errors Items, devices or supplies (other than surgical items, devices or supplies) that are used solely for specified purposes Payment made by an insurer or a self insured plan to a physician to satisfy a claim submitted on a fee for service basis for the furnishing of health services by the physician to an individual who is covered by a policy with the insurer or self insured plan (under certain conditions) 42 C.F.R. 411.351 6 3

Remuneration Guidance on carveouts CMS advisory opinions CMS AO 2008 01 CMS AO 2010 01 CMS AO 2013 01 CMS AO 2013 02 CY 2016 PFS Proposed Rule 7 Remuneration Item, device or supply must be used solely for the entity that furnished the item, device or supply Item, device or supply must be used for one or more of the 6 purposes in order to qualify for the used solely carveout Collect specimens for the entity furnishing the items, devices, or supplies Transport specimens for the entity furnishing the items, devices, or supplies Process specimens for the entity furnishing the items, devices, or supplies Store specimens for the entity furnishing the items, devices, or supplies Order tests or procedures for the entity furnishing the items, devices, or supplies Communicate the results of tests or procedures for the entity furnishing the items, devices, or supplies Surgical items, devices or supplies are always remuneration 80 Fed. Reg. at 41918 8 4

Remuneration Split billing scenarios There is no remuneration where Physician provides professional services to the patient on site at a DHS entity and bills the appropriate payor for his or her services; and DHS entity provides its resources and services to the patient and bills the appropriate payor for the resources and services Caution If a physician or a DHS entity bills a non Medicare payor globally for both the physician s services and the hospital s resources and services, a benefit is conferred on the party receiving payment 80 Fed. Reg. at 41918 9 Remuneration Primarily for the benefit of the DHS entity or its patients The free use of a dedicated computer terminal used only for the hospital patients and services strikes us as unlikely to involve remuneration to the physician so long as the computer terminal has no independent value to the physician. 69 Fed. Reg. 16054, 16114 (Mar. 26, 2004) Letters from CMS to ACCME and AMA 10 5

Remuneration What about: Training on use of gamma knife or MAKOplasty procedure? Is the training reasonable? Does it require travel or can it be done on site? Is it contemplated in the physician s agreement? What impact will it have on the physician s reimbursement? Direct mailboxes EHR secured transmissions? Restricted use vs. allowing personal use Is there a value to the physician? Have you crossed the threshold into remuneration Are there exceptions available to protect the relationship Nonmonetary compensation Medical staff incidental benefits 11 Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition 12 6

Nonmonetary Compensation Definition: compensation in the form of items or services (not including cash or cash equivalents) The provision of NMC that does not exceed the limit set by CMS does not constitute a financial relationship if The compensation is not determined in any manner that takes into account the volume or value of referrals or other business generated between the parties; The compensation is not solicited by the physician or the physician s practice; and The compensation arrangement does not violate the antikickback statute or any Federal or State law or regulation governing billing or claims submission 13 Nonmonetary Compensation Calendar year limit Resets each January 1 Longest period of noncompliance runs through December 31 (absent unusual circumstances) Adjusted each calendar year by the increase in the CPI U for the 12 month period ending the previous September 30 $392 limit for 2015 NMC that exceeds the annual limit may be deemed to be within the limit if The value of the excess is no more than 50 percent of the limit; and The physician returns to the entity the excess NMC (or an amount equal to the value of the excess NMC) by the earlier of The end of the calendar year in which it was received; or 180 consecutive calendar days following the date the excess NMC was received by the physician Deeming provision may be used by an entity only once every 3 years with respect to the same referring physician 14 7

Nonmonetary Compensation Divisibility of NMC Artwork Plants Sandwich trays Doctors Day Ugly holiday sweaters and other compliance issues NMC to immediate family members 15 Nonmonetary Compensation Allocating NMC to physicians in a physician organization The exception for nonmonetary compensation up to $300 protects only gifts to individual physicians. Thus, gifts given to a group practice would not qualify for this exception. 66 Fed. Reg. 856, 921 (Jan. 4, 2001) Stand in the shoes rules deem a gift to a physician organization to be a gift to each physician who stands in the shoes of the physician organization. Indirect compensation arrangement analysis for physicians who do not stand in the shoes of the physician organization 16 8

Nonmonetary Compensation Allocating nonmonetary compensation to physicians in a physician organization luncheons How many people were present at the luncheon provided as NMC?» How many of the attendees were physicians?» How many physicians are in the physician organization? Did the DHS entity (or its representative) participate in the luncheon? Does the physician organization usually provide lunch for its staff? 17 Nonmonetary Compensation Doctors Day and other medical staff functions In addition to NMC up to the annual limit, an entity may provide one medical staff appreciation event per year, provided that The entity has a formal medical staff Physician organizations are deemed to have formal medical staffs The event is local The event is for the entire medical staff Door prizes and favors DO count as NMC If the entity has more than one event, only one is exempt from the NMC annual limit. Choose wisely. These events generally do not qualify as medical staff incidental benefits because the physicians are not making rounds or engaged in other services or activities that benefit the hospital or its patients. 18 9

Nonmonetary Compensation Best practices for monitoring compliance Maintain a Stark Log Centralize the process/routine monitoring Be mindful of the year end events and gifts and the annual limit Establish clear guidelines on how to assign value Valuing free things Valuing discounted things Floccinaucinihilipilification The estimation of something as valueless In physician self referral terms, how to value something the physician says has no value Gift cards and travelers checks cash equivalents Immediate family member issues 19 Nonmonetary Compensation Why do immediate family members have a separate annual NMC limit? Step 1: Has an physician made a prohibited referral when an immediate family member has been provided NMC? Look to the prohibition on referrals at 42 C.F.R. 411.353(a) Physician who has a financial relationship with an entity OR who has an immediate family member who has a financial relationship with an entity Step 2: Does the immediate family member have a financial relationship with the hospital and, if so, which type? Direct financial relationship exists if remuneration passes between the referring physician (or a member of his or her immediate family) and the entity furnishing DHS without any intervening persons or entities between them (42 CFR 411.354(a)(2)(i)) Definition of financial relationship includes an ownership or investment interest and a compensation arrangement (42 CFR 411.354(a)(1)) A compensation arrangement is any arrangement involving remuneration, direct or indirect, between a physician (or a member of a physician's immediate family) and an entity (42 CFR 411.354(c)) A direct compensation arrangement exists if remuneration passes between the referring physician (or a member of his or her immediate family) and the entity furnishing DHS without any intervening persons or entities (42 CFR 411.354(c)(1)) 20 10

Nonmonetary Compensation Step 3: Does the compensation arrangement between the immediate family member and the hospital satisfy the requirements of the exception for nonmonetary compensation at 42 C.F.R. 411.357(k), thus rendering it NOT a financial relationship that implicates the physician self referral law? For purposes of 42 C.F.R. 411.353, the following compensation arrangements do not constitute a financial relationship Compensation from an entity in the form of items or services (not including cash or cash equivalents) that does not exceed an aggregate of $300 per calendar year, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with paragraph (k)(2) of this section where all of the requirements of the exception are satisfied. 21 Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition 22 11

Physician Recruitment Exception Remuneration by a hospital to a physician Intended to induce the physician To relocate his or her medical practice to the hospital s geographic service area To become a member of the hospital s medical staff Writing signed by all parties (hospital, physician, and group if joining) 23 Physician Recruitment Exception Compensation Not conditioned on referrals Hospital does not determine the amount of remuneration in any manner that takes into account the volume or value of any actual or anticipated referrals by the physician or other business generated between the parties Physician must be permitted to establish staff privileges at other hospitals 24 12

Physician Recruitment Exception Geographic Service Area (GSA) Lowest number of contiguous zip codes from which the hospital draws at least 75% of inpatients Donut hole exception for surrounded Zero Zip Code All contiguous zip codes from which the hospital draws inpatients if fewer than 75% Rural hospitals Contiguous zip codes with 90% If less than 90%, noncontiguous zip codes available 25 Physician Recruitment Exception Relocation: Moves practice into GSA and 25 miles or New practice derives at least 75% of its professional revenues from new patients (not seen in last 3 years) During year 1, can have reasonable expectation Exceptions to relocation requirement for residents or new physicians 26 13

Physician Recruitment Exception Joining Existing Practice Remuneration stays with physician If there is an income guarantee, the parties can only allocate actual incremental costs attributable to physician Special rule for recruitment into a rural area or HPSA Remuneration is not determined in any manner that takes into account the volume or value of referrals from the recruited physician or the practice Includes the referrals of any physician affiliated with the practice Actual or anticipated referrals The practice may not impose practice restrictions that unreasonably restrict the recruited physician s ability to practice medicine in the hospital s GSA 27 Exception for Physician Recruitment Important limitations Intended to induce the physician to come to the area and join the medical staff Pre existing obligation to move to the area and become employed by a physician organization could negate the hospital s ability to recruit the physician Cannot add remuneration after it s been decided and agreed upon Use caution when recruiting residents with significant time remaining in residency Only covers remuneration from the hospital to the physician (not providing the physician practice assistance to recruit) What about hiring the physician practice to perform recruitment services? Must comply with an available exception Personal service arrangement Fair market value compensation 28 14

Physician Recruitment Hospital under construction What is the hospital s GSA if the hospital does not exist? Limit what you give the doctor If you get it wrong, cancel the agreement and repay? (better be in contract for that option) Quit medical staff and start over? 25 miles 75% new patient revenue 29 Physician Recruitment Part time recruitment Not prohibited No FMV requirement Practice tips must consider AKS Shared recruitment by two hospitals GSA overlap issue Timing issues 30 15

Physician Recruitment Loans Not required but common Hospital must enforce terms Forgiving loan outside of terms may be considered remuneration to the physician or group for which there is no exception 31 Errata Physician Recruitment No definition of GSA for FQHCs or RHCs Addressed in CY 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule 80 Fed. Reg. at 41913 CMS proposed two alternative definitions Retention payment guidance mismatch Addressed in CY 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule 80 Fed. Reg. at 41914 15 32 16

Anomaly Physician Recruitment Joining a practice after the individual recruited physician has relocated and the arrangement exists In the case of a physician who joins a physician practice, 42 C.F.R. 411.357(e)(4)(i) requires that the physician practice has signed the writing that evidences the arrangement regardless of when the physician joins 33 Recruitment of Nonphysician Practitioners The physician recruitment exception in 411.357(e) applies only to payments made directly (or, in some circumstances, passed through) to a recruited physician. Recruitment payments made by a hospital directly to a nonphysician practitioner would not implicate the physician self referral law, unless the nonphysician practitioner serves as conduit for physician referrals or is an immediate family member of a referral physician. 72 Fed. Reg. 51012, 51049 (Sep. 5, 2007) In the CY 2016 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, CMS proposed a limited exception for assistance to employ a nonphysician practitioner. 80 Fed. Reg. at 41910 34 17

Proposed Exception for Assistance to Employ Nonphysician Practitioners Proposed to protect arrangements Between a DHS entity and a physician (either directly or standing in the shoes of his or her physician organization Where remuneration from the DHS entity does not exceed the lower of 50 percent of the actual salary, signing bonus and benefits paid by the physician to the NPP; or Salary, signing bonus and benefits paid to the NPP minus receipts attributable to services furnished by the NPP Not conditioned on the referrals of the physician or NPP Where remuneration does not take into account the volume or value of the referrals by the physician, NPP, or any other physician or NPP in the practice (or other business generated between the parties) 35 Proposed Exception for Assistance to Employ Nonphysician Practitioners Proposed requirements for protected arrangements include Geographic service area NPP must not have practiced in the GSA within 3 years of becoming employed by the physician (or the physician organization in whose shoes the physician stands) NPP must not have been employed or otherwise engaged to provide patient care services by a physician or a physician organization that has a medical practice site located in the GSA, regardless of whether the nonphysician practitioner furnished services at the medical practice site located in the GSA Employment status of NPP: bona fide employee Services furnished by NPP: only primary care services Physician may not impose practice restrictions that unreasonably restrict the NPP s ability to provide patient care services in the GSA Arrangement does not violate the anti kickback statute or any Federal or State law governing billing or claims submission Records made available to the Secretary upon request for at least 6 years 36 18

Retention Payments Disconnect between Phase III preamble and regulation text Preamble: A retention payment based on a physician certification may not exceed the lower of the following: (1) an amount equal to 25 percent of the physician s current annual income (averaged over the previous 24 months) using a reasonable and consistent methodology that is calculated uniformly; and (2) the reasonable costs the hospital would otherwise have to expend to recruit a new physician to the geographic area served by the hospital in order to join the medical staff of the hospital to replace the retained physician. 72 Fed. Reg. at 51066 Regulation text: A retention payment based on a physician certification may not exceed the lower of: (1) an amount equal to 25 percent of the physician s current income (measured over no more than a 24 month period), using a reasonable and consistent methodology that is calculated uniformly; or (2) the reasonable costs the hospital would otherwise have to expend to recruit a new physician. Proposed regulation text would mirror the Phase III preamble. 37 Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition 38 19

Compliance Challenges Office space: Item or service? Or neither? Proposal to interpret other items or services in the exception for payments by a physician to mean any kind of items or services that a physician might purchase, but not include clinical laboratory services or those specifically excepted under another provision in 411.355 through 411.357 63 Fed. Reg. 1659, 1703 (Jan. 9, 1998) Phase II response to a commenter disagreeing with CMS s interpretation stated that CMS s position is consistent with the overall statutory scheme and purpose, and is necessary to prevent the exception from negating the statute. 69 Fed. Reg. at 16099 CMS does not believe that the lease of office space is an item or service. A space lease must qualify under the exception for the rental of office space. 72 Fed. Reg. at 51059 39 Compliance Challenges Office space: Lease or license? Comment: One commenter described a time share leasing arrangement under which a physician or group practice pays the lessor for the right to use office space exclusively on a turnkey basis.... The commenter suggested that, although this arrangement may qualify under the exceptions for the rental of [office] space and equipment, it would be addressed more appropriately in the fair market value exception or payments by a physician exception. The commenter urged us to clarify that such time share arrangements may qualify under [these exceptions]. Response: We disagree with the commenter. As we stated in Phase II, we decline to permit space leases to be eligible for the fair market value exception in 411.357(l). Similarly, we are not persuaded that [the exception for payments by a physician] should protect space leases. 72 Fed. Reg. at 51044 45 (emphasis added) 40 20

Proposed Exception for Timeshare Arrangements CMS proposed a new exception for timeshare arrangements in the CY 2016 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule 80 Fed. Reg. at 41921 Proposed to protect arrangements for the license (or use) of premises, equipment, personnel, items, supplies or services Licensor must be a hospital or physician organization Licensed premises, equipment, personnel, items, supplies or services must be used predominantly for the provision of evaluation and management services Licensed equipment must be located in the office suite where the evaluation and management services are furnished and may not be Advanced imaging equipment Radiation therapy equipment Clinical or pathology laboratory equipment (other than equipment used to furnish CLIA waived tests) Used to furnish DHS other than those incidental to the evaluation and management services furnished by the physician at the time of the patient s evaluation and management visit The proposed regulatory text does NOT say incident to the evaluation and management services Proposed exception would not permit license fees that are percentage based or per unit of servicebased, but would protect per hour, per day, or other time based formulas Usual requirements to protect against program or patient abuse included Cannot violate the anti kickback statute Compensation may not take into account the volume and value of referrals Etc. 41 Compliance Challenges Amending arrangements and preserving compliance Material vs. nonmaterial amendments Rental charges and financial terms 72 Fed. Reg. at 51044 73 Fed. Reg. 48434, 48697 (Aug. 19, 2008) Other terms and conditions Notice and pay to address Payment frequency Space creep Employment status of physician 42 21

Compliance Challenges Live agreements and curing is it even possible? Live lease arrangement with past due rent Can you seek repayment and bring lease current during the existing lease term to cure the non compliance? Live lease with space creep issue rental charge remains the same, but amount of space leased increases Can you amend the amount of space (which is not a financial term) and cure the non compliance? Is there a series of writings to support the additional space? Has the tenant been paying for the additional space at the rate set forth in the lease agreement? Live lease with inflation index not collected Can you collect inflation increase to cure? 43 Compliance Challenges Breach of contract claims and other disputes: Settling disputes to avoid litigation Have you evaluated the anticipated cost of litigation? Have you evaluated the likelihood of success/failure? Is the settlement amount reasonable? Is the Isolated Transaction Exception (42 C.F.R. 411.357(f)) available to protect the relationship? Legally enforceable agreement but Stark violation Don t submit claims for the services rendered; Prohibit referrals 44 22

Compliance Challenges Impact on the period of non compliance Waiving and/or compromising the amount owed may extend the period of disallowance What is the practice/pattern? Are amounts owed routinely waived? Have you made reasonable collection efforts? Have you received for the compromised amount? Unringing the Stark bell is it possible to retroactively cure noncompliance? 45 Compliance Challenges Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) responsible for the development and testing of innovative health care payment and delivery models for example ACOs Episode Based Payment Models (Bundled Payments) Fraud and Abuse Waivers Issued by CMS and OIG Waive Stark, AKS, and CMP rules don t apply if acting within the scope of the waivers; protects the financial arrangement Shared Savings Program Waivers currently at OPM! Different rules of play depending on payment model be mindful of impact on hospital operations, training, compliance, policies and procedures, etc. 46 23

Miscellaneous Explanations and Important Citations Rural provider exception Must meet both parts of the 2 part test The DHS must be furnished in a rural area The entity must furnish substantially all (not less than 75 percent) of the DHS that it furnishes to residents of a rural area Productivity bonuses for hospital employed physicians The fact that corresponding hospital services are billed would not invalidate an employed physician s personally performed work, for which the physician may be paid a productivity bonus (subject to the fair market value requirement). 69 Fed. Reg. at 16088 09 Inpatient and outpatient hospital services converts otherwise non DHS to DHS by virtue of provider of service Exception: lithotripsy 47 Trivial Pursuit: Stark Law Edition 48 24

Clarifications and Proposals from the CY 2016 PFS Proposed Rule Clarifications vs. proposals what s the difference? Writing requirements, term requirements, and holdover arrangements Applying the exceptions where a physician stands in the shoes of his or her physician organization Signature requirements Timing Form Physician owned hospitals Public advertising and public website for the hospital Physician ownership Web site vs. website 49 Contact Information Tony Maida Partner, McDermott Will & Emery LLP tmaida@mwe.com 212 547 5492 Catherine Martin Principal, Ober Kaler camartin@ober.com 410 347 7320 Lisa Ohrin Wilson Senior Technical Advisor, CMS lisa.wilson2@cms.hhs.gov 410 786 8852 50 25