RICHARD A. EASTERLIN. Is Reported Happiness Five Years Ago Comparable to Present Happiness? A Cautionary Note

Similar documents
Happiness of Women and Men in Later Life: Nature, Determinants, and Prospects. Richard A. Easterlin University of Southern California.

Looking Backward and Forward, Americans See Less Progress in Their Lives

Assessing Correlation Between Macro and Regional Economic Indicators and the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index

Explaining the Easterlin paradox

The Social Costs of Unemployment: Accounting for Unemployment Duration

The Relative Income Hypothesis: A comparison of methods.

Unemployment and Happiness

The Effects of Transition on Life Satisfaction in Poland. Laura Angelescu 1 University of Southern California January 2008

FINANCIAL MODELING OF FOREIGN EXCHANGE RATES USING THE US DOLLAR AND THE EURO EXCHANGE RATES: A PEDAGOGICAL NOTE

Should a government target real income growth or devote more resource's to the reduction of unemployment? Which will yield more happiness?

Does Growth make us Happier? A New Look at the Easterlin Paradox

EC989 Behavioural Economics. Sketch solutions for Class 2

Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 10 Number 2 Summer 1997 AN ANALYSIS OF VALUE LINE S ABILITY TO FORECAST LONG-RUN RETURNS

JALAL EL OUARDIGHI & FRANCIS MUNIER FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES ECONOMIQUES ET DE GESTION UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: BIG CARROT, SMALL STICK

Can Happiness Data Help Evaluate Economic Policies?

DISCRETIONARY DELETIONS FROM THE S&P 500 INDEX: EVIDENCE ON FORECASTED AND REALIZED EARNINGS Stoyu I. Ivanov, San Jose State University

Final Report on MAPPR Project: The Detroit Living Wage Ordinance: Will it Reduce Urban Poverty? David Neumark May 30, 2001

The Effects of Income Losses and Gains on Happiness: Do Temporary Trends Matter? An Exploratory Note

Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model

Employment protection: Do firms perceptions match with legislation?

SOCIAL SECURITY AND SAVING: NEW TIME SERIES EVIDENCE MARTIN FELDSTEIN *

Comparison Income Effect on Subjective Well-Being

University of Southern California. Institute of Medicine May, 2013

Social Security and Saving: A Comment

Risk Tolerance and Risk Exposure: Evidence from Panel Study. of Income Dynamics

Life Satisfaction and Preferences over Economic Growth and Institutional Quality

ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY AND SMALL BUSINESS DECISIONS

Do Living Wages alter the Effect of the Minimum Wage on Income Inequality?

The Use of Market Information in Bank Supervision: Interest Rates on Large Time Deposits

Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 9 Number 3 Fall 1996 THE JANUARY SIZE EFFECT REVISITED: IS IT A CASE OF RISK MISMEASUREMENT?

Happiness and House Prices in Canada:

Productivity and Sustainable Consumption in OECD Countries:

Does Inequality Reduce Happiness? Evidence from the States of the USA from the 1970s to the 1990s

STX FACULTY WORKING! PAPER NO An Error-Learning Model of Treasury Bill Future* and Implications for the Expectation Hypothesis. nun.

Interrelationship between Profitability, Financial Leverage and Capital Structure of Textile Industry in India Dr. Ruchi Malhotra

Does consumer sentiment forecast household spending? The Hong Kong case

Challenging Belief in the Law of Small Numbers

THE CHANGING SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF U.S. TRADE UNIONS AND ITS DESCRIPTION BY PARETO S DISTRIBUTION. John Pencavel. Mainz, June 2012

URL:

DOES RELATIVE INCOME MATTER? ARE THE CRITICS RIGHT?

Comprehensive Project

The intervalling effect bias in beta: A note

REGULATION, INVESTMENT, AND GROWTH ACROSS COUNTRIES

Modeling Federal Funds Rates: A Comparison of Four Methodologies

Exports and Economic Growth: Further Evidence

Inflation can have two principal kinds of redistributive effects. Even when

Cross-country Differences in Well-being Consequences of Unemployment in Europe

The incidence of the inclusion of food at home preparation in the sales tax base

How Your Bank Balance Buys Happiness: The Importance of Cash on Hand to Life Satisfaction

RISK AMD THE RATE OF RETUR1^I ON FINANCIAL ASSETS: SOME OLD VJINE IN NEW BOTTLES. Robert A. Haugen and A. James lleins*

The impact of changing diversification on stability and growth in a regional economy

The Macroeconomics of Happiness

David N.F. Bell Division of Economics Stirling Management School, University of Stirling and IZA

Building a Better Mousetrap: Enhanced Dollar Cost Averaging

International evidence of tax smoothing in a panel of industrial countries

Effect of new benchmark PPPs on the PPP time series. Bettina Aten Bureau of Economic Analysis, Washington, DC, USA

Chinese Firms Political Connection, Ownership, and Financing Constraints

The Market Approach to Valuing Businesses (Second Edition)

Volume 30, Issue 4. Credit risk, trade credit and finance: evidence from Taiwanese manufacturing firms

Investment in Information Security Measures: A Behavioral Investigation

Estimating Terminal Values with Inflation: The Inputs Matter It is not a Formulaic Exercise

Ideal Bootstrapping and Exact Recombination: Applications to Auction Experiments

Do people adapt to changes in income and other circumstances? The discussion is not finished yet.

Canary Wharf Case Analysis

Does labor force participation rates of youth vary within the business cycle? Evidence from Germany and Poland

Julio Videras Department of Economics Hamilton College

Incorporation of Fixed-Flexible Exchange Rates in Econometric Trade Models: A Grafted Polynomial Approach

Answers To Chapter 6. Review Questions

res Key Ideas great or Over the

The Economics of Happiness

A Survey of the Relationship between Earnings Management and the Cost of Capital in Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

Survey of Capital Market Assumptions

It s Simpler Than It Seems: An Alternative Explanation for the Magnitude Effect in Tipping. Michael Lynn & Michael Sturman

RECENT TRENDS IN CONSUMPTION IN JAPAN AND THE OTHER GROUP OF SEVEN (G7) COUNTRIES

Comment on Counting the World s Poor, by Angus Deaton

Introduction. Learning Objectives. Chapter 8. Measuring the Economy s Performance

Volume 29, Issue 3. Application of the monetary policy function to output fluctuations in Bangladesh

How Do You Measure Which Retirement Income Strategy Is Best?

THE DESIGN OF THE INDIVIDUAL ALTERNATIVE

This is a repository copy of Asymmetries in Bank of England Monetary Policy.

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Change in Capital Gains Tax Rates and IPO Underpricing

Journal Of Financial And Strategic Decisions Volume 10 Number 3 Fall 1997 CORPORATE MANAGERS RISKY BEHAVIOR: RISK TAKING OR AVOIDING?

Is the UK Moving Up the International Wellbeing Rankings?

The Effect of Macroeconomic Conditions on Applications to Supplemental Security Income

CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND THE 2003 TAX CUTS Richard H. Fosberg

IS THERE A KINK IN THE HAPPINESS LITERATURE?

Inflation Uncertainty, Investment Spending, and Fiscal Policy

Austerity and Military Expenditures in Developing Countries: The Case of Venezuela

VARIABILITY OF THE INFLATION RATE AND THE FORWARD PREMIUM IN A MONEY DEMAND FUNCTION: THE CASE OF THE GERMAN HYPERINFLATION

APPENDIX (EASTERLIN, WANG, & WANG, GROWTH AND HAPPINESS IN CHINA, )

A Test of the Normality Assumption in the Ordered Probit Model *

Conservative Impact on Distributable Profits of Companies Listed on the Capital Market of Iran

How Does Education Affect Mental Well-Being and Job Satisfaction?

Chapter URL:

WORKING PAPER MASSACHUSETTS

The Impact of Foreign Capital Transfers on Developing Country Agriculture. Donald W. Larson and Robert C. Vogel * ABSTRACT

STATE PENSIONS AND THE WELL-BEING OF

CHAPTER 2. Hidden unemployment in Australia. William F. Mitchell

The Velocity of Money and Nominal Interest Rates: Evidence from Developed and Latin-American Countries

Transcription:

RICHARD A. EASTERLIN Is Reported Happiness Five Years Ago Comparable to Present Happiness? A Cautionary Note ABSTRACT: In the United States reported happiness five years ago is not comparable to present happiness. The improvement in happiness over the last five years obtained by differencing current reports of happiness today and happiness five years ago is not significantly related to the actual improvement in happiness over the same period. The currently reported five-year change in happiness is highly sensitive to current economic conditions, varying inversely with both the inflation and unemployment rates. Ordinarily, happiness five years ago as currently reported is less than present happiness, but the worse current economic conditions are, the better the past looks relative to the present. If current economic conditions get bad enough, past happiness will be rated higher than present. Reports of happiness five years ago are not telling us about the utility respondents actually experienced at that time; they are telling us, instead, about respondents current decision utility which situation, today s or that five years ago, they would opt for if given the choice today. KEY WORDS: past happiness, present happiness, decision utility, experienced utility. If any evidence were needed, the fascinating issue of the Journal of Happiness Studies (2001, vol. 2, no. 2) on Happiness in Russia demonstrates the unique value of this new journal. I want to express a concern, however, about the time series of happiness (and life satisfaction) presented in the issue, specifically the use of happiness in

2 1988 as reported in 1993 as comparable to actual happiness in 1993 and subsequent years. 1 The basic problem is that reports today of happiness five years ago tell us, not how the respondents actually felt five years ago, but how they would feel now if placed in conditions like those five years ago. In short, they are essentially responding to the question how happy would you be today if conditions were like those five years ago? In countries experiencing long term economic growth, material conditions trend upwards; hence people typically rate past happiness as less than present happiness, because they would not want to go back to the inferior conditions of five years ago (Easterlin 2001, pp. 471-472). In the United States in the 21 years between 1964 and 1985 for which data are available the average difference between today s happiness and happiness five years ago as currently reported, with happiness measured on a 0-10 scale, is 0.4, ranging from -0.1 to 0.9 (Table 1, column 1). But happiness as actually reported in each year exhibits little trend over time, positive or negative; the average difference for the same five year intervals is 0.1, ranging from -0.3 to 0.5 (column 2). There is little indication of a long-term trend in actual happiness, as other studies of the United States have consistently found (Blanchflower and Oswald, 2001; Easterlin 1995; Kenny 1999). 2 If one were to use current reports of present and past happiness to infer the change in happiness over the last five years, one would mistakenly conclude that there had been an upward trend. Statistically, the change in happiness over the past five years as currently reported (column 1) provides no basis for estimating the actual change (column 2). The ordinary least squares regression coefficient of column 2 on column 1 is not significantly different from zero.

3 A recent study of the United Kingdom and the United States has demonstrated that current subjective well-being tends to vary inversely with both the inflation rate and the unemployment rate (DiTella, McCulloch and Oswald, 2001). Reports today of happiness five years ago are also quite sensitive to current economic conditions, and if conditions have recently worsened, people tend to look at the past more favorably. In Table 1 the years are rank ordered in terms of the improvement in happiness over the last five years implied by current reports. As one goes from top to bottom in the table there is a clear tendency for the magnitude of improvement in happiness to be smaller the higher the current rate of inflation and the higher the current unemployment rate. In other words, the worse current economic conditions are, the better the past looks relative to the present (compare cols. 1, 3, and 4). is: The ordinary least squares regression of column 1 on columns 3 and 4 in Table 1 Δrh = 1.704 -.0457 Δcpi -.1388 ur (5.879) (-3.429) (-3.900) where Δrh is the currently reported change in happiness since 5 years ago, Δcpi is the inflation rate in the past year, and ur is the current unemployment rate. The coefficients on both the inflation and unemployment rates are negative and significant (t-statistic in parentheses), confirming that the reported improvement is lower the higher the inflation and unemployment rates. The relative magnitude of the coefficients implies that a one point change in the unemployment rate has three times the impact of a one point change in the inflation rate. This is offset, however, by the greater

4 variability in the inflation rate, which has a standard deviation about three times that in the unemployment rate. It is the reported difference between present and past happiness that is chiefly sensitive to current economic conditions. If current happiness and reported happiness five years ago the minuend and subtrahend of the difference in column 1 are separately regressed on columns (3) and (4), only the coefficient of past happiness on the unemployment rate is statistically significant, and then barely so. 3 And it is economic conditions in the last year, not the last five years that chiefly explain the reported change in happiness. If column (1) is regressed on the increase in consumer prices and the average unemployment rate over the last five years, only the coefficient on the consumer price index is statistically significant. If current conditions become bad enough, the past will actually be rated more favorably than the present. In Table 1 the one year in which past happiness is rated higher than present happiness is 1982, the year in which the United States experienced its highest rate of unemployment in the entire post-world War II period (see columns 1 and 4). The deterioration in United States economic conditions that reached its worst in 1982 is nothing like the deterioration of the Russian economy between 1988 and 1993. It should come as no surprise, therefore, to find that Russians in 1993 say that they were happier in 1988. But what they are telling us is that, given a choice today that is, in 1993 between the economic conditions of 1988 and 1993, they would be happier under those prevailing in 1988. They are not telling us how happy they actually were in 1988 when they experienced the conditions of that year, any more than Americans reporting on

5 their happiness five years ago are telling us how happy they actually were at that time. In the absence of 1988 survey data, we will probably never know the actual happiness of Russians in 1988. The distinction drawn by psychologists between decision utility and experienced utility helps explain why reports today of happiness five years ago can not be taken as comparable to present happiness (Kahneman et al., 1997; Tversky and Griffin, 1991). Decision utility is the satisfaction that people anticipate when choosing among alternatives; experienced utility is the satisfaction actually realized in any given situation. People s actual happiness today or five years ago is the utility they actually enjoy at that time their experienced utility. But when asked today about well-being five years ago, people are telling us, not about their experienced utility, but about their decision utility which situation they would prefer if they were to choose today between present conditions and those five years ago. Simply put, decision utility what people say today about their happiness five years ago should not be assumed to be the same as experienced utility how happy they actually felt at that time. This does not mean that retrospective evaluations of happiness are meaningless. They do tell us how people feel today about past conditions relative to the present, and, in Russia s case, clearly suggest dissatisfaction with the present. I have used here the inflation and unemployment rates in Table 1 as indicators of economic conditions in the United States, because they are known to influence subjective well-being. But they do not exhaust the economic circumstances potentially relevant to well-being. Additionally, current social and political conditions may affect judgments of past well-being. Clearly, there is opportunity for further research. My aim has been to

6 demonstrate that there is good reason to be wary of treating current judgments of past happiness as substitutes for actual happiness at that time. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Donna H. Ebata and Paul Rivera for excellent assistance, to two anonymous referees for helpful comments, and to the University of Southern California for financial support. NOTES 1 See, for example, Saris and Andreenkova (2001), p. 103, Figure 3 and Table II, and Veenhoven (2001), p. 114, Figure 1, and p. 116, Figure 2. 2 In Easterlin (2001), I propose a theory to explain both the constancy over time in actual happiness and the usual evaluation of past happiness as less than present. 3 The DiTella, McCulloch, and Oswald (2001) study cited above that does find a significant inverse relation of current subjective well-being to the unemployment and inflation rates regresses life satisfaction residuals on these rates. The residuals are obtained after controlling for a number of person-specific characteristics. REFERENCES Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A.J., 2001. Well-being Over Time in Britain and the USA, unpublished manuscript, October. Available by request at blanchflower@dartmouth.edu and Andrew.Oswald@warwick.ac.uk. Di-Tella, R., MacCulloch, R.J. and Oswald, A.J., 2001. Preferences over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness, American Economic Review 91:1 (March), 335-341. Easterlin, R.A., 2001. Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory, Economic Journal, 111:473 (July), 465-484. Easterlin, R.A., 1995. Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27:1 (June), 35-48. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P.P. and Sarin, R., 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112:2 (May), 375-405.

7 Kenny, C., 1999. Does Growth Cause Happiness or Does Happiness Cause Growth? Kyklos, 52:1, 3-26. Lipset, S.M. and Schneider, W., 1987. The Confidence Gap: Business, Labor, and Government in the Public Mind, revised edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Saris, W.E., 2001. What Influences Subjective Well-Being in Russia? Journal of Happiness Studies, 2:2, 137-146. Tversky, A. and Griffin, D., 1991. Endowment and Contrast in Judgments of Well-Being, in F. Strack, M. Argyle and N. Schwarz, eds., Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 101-18. U.S. Council of Economic Advisers, 1993. Economic Report of the President, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office. Veenhoven, R., 2001. Are the Russians as Unhappy as They Say They Are? Comparability of Self-Reports Across Nations, Journal of Happiness Studies, 2:2, 111-136. Address for Correspondence: RICHARD A. EASTERLIN Department of Economics University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-0253 USA easterl@usc.edu

8 Table 1 Reported and Actual Change in Happiness since Five Years Ago, And Current Economic Conditions, United States, Selected Years 1964-85 (1) (2) (3) (4) Increase in Present Minus Past Happiness consumer price Unemployment Reported Actual improve- index since rate in current Current improvement ment since 5 1 year ago year year a since 5 yrs ago b years ago b (percent) (percent) 1964 0.9 0.3 1.3 5.2 1984 0.7 0.5 4.3 7.5 1978 0.5 n.a. 7.6 6.1 1977 0.5-0.2 6.5 7.1 1976 0.5-0.3 5.8 7.7 1985 0.3-0.2 3.6 7.2 1979 0.3 0.3 11.3 5.8 1983 0.3 0.4 3.2 9.6 1980 0.2 0.2 13.5 7.1 1981 0.1 0.0 10.3 7.6 1982-0.1 0.1 6.2 9.7 Average 0.4 0.1 6.6 7.3 Sources: Happiness from Lipset and Schneider, 1987, p. 131. Respondents rated present and past happiness on a ladder of life with a 0-10 integer scale. Multiple entries for the same year in the source have been averaged. Consumer price index and the unemployment rate are from U.S. Council of Economic Advisers, 1993, pp. 383, 411. n.a. = not available. a. Years are ranked in order of column (1). b. Negative entry indicates decline in happiness since five years ago.