GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2015 Legislative Retirement Note

Similar documents
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Retirement Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Retirement Note

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2017 Legislative Retirement Note

Decisions on Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

Decisions on Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

Discussion and Analysis of Proposed Election Assumption Conduent Human Resource Services

NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD PENSION FUND Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2012

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2016

Consolidated Judicial Retirement System of North Carolina Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Report on the Annual Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Exhibit 1. Morningstar, State of North Carolina Pension Overview (Nov. 20, 2013).

Legislative Retirement System of North Carolina. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2015

Pension Plan of Town of West Warwick Management Summary of 7/1/2013 Actuarial Valuation

National Guard Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2014

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund. Report on the Annual Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2014

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2014

Decisions on Local Governmental Employees Retirement System (LGERS)

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, Maine Public Employees Retirement System Retiree Group Life Insurance. Presented by Cheiron

Teachers and State Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

North Carolina Local Governmental Employees Retirement System. Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2015

City of Marine City Retirement

Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial. Actuarial

Teachers Retirement Association of Minnesota A Pension Trust Fund of the State of Minnesota. Actuarial

IPERS Actuarial Assumptions and Methods 2015

June 30, Additional Factors. Dear Mr. Watts:

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2016

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System

West Virginia Teachers Retirement System

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

State of Wyoming Retirement System Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Beginning January 1, 2018

Wyoming Volunteer Firefighter and Emergency Medical Technician Pension Fund Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Beginning January 1, 2018

DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER. August 13, 2003

City of Marine City Retirement

Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Virginia Retirement System. Prepared as of June 30, 2014

December 4, Minnesota State Retirement System Legislators Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

Guidance on Return-to-Work Laws for Members of the Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS)

City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

FBS Summer Conference July 19, 2018

Registers of Deeds Supplemental Pension Fund Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2015

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

January 31, Retirement Board 40 Fountain Street, First Floor Providence, RI Dear Members of the Board:

June 30, Full Actuarial Cost Factors. Dear Mr. Watts:

North Carolina Firefighters and Rescue Squad Workers Pension Fund Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013

March 26, The purpose of the valuation of the City of Eastpointe Employees Death Benefit Plan as of November 1, 2012 is to:

El Paso County Retirement Plan

E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M O F R H O D E I S L A ND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 3

Presented by Steve Toole & Sam Watts, N.C. Department of State Treasurer

Local Governmental Employees Retirement System Principal Results of Actuarial Valuation as of December 31, 2017

Maine Public Employees Retirement System Judicial Retirement Program. Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2017

MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

June 2, 2016 City #00048

City of Dover, Delaware General Employee Pension Plan. July 1, 2016 Actuarial Valuation Report

REPORT ON THE JANUARY 1, 2012 ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE BELMONT CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM

State Universities Retirement System of Illinois. Actuarial Valuation Report as of June 30, 2018

Sample Notes to the Financial Statements Single Plan Political Subdivision Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2016

SUCCESS STRATEGIES. for Well-Funded Pension Plans

Wyoming Law Enforcement Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report for the Year Beginning January 1, 2018

Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

PENSION BOARD CONSULTANTS, INC. Actuarial Report as of October 1, 2015

Re: Public Education Employee Retirement System of Missouri ("PEERS") Cost Estimate of Proposed Benefit Changes

A R K A N S A S P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M ( I N C L U D I N G D I S T R I C T J U D G E S ) G A S B S T A T E M E

DISCUSSION ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Actuarial Section ARLINGTON COUNTY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM. Arlington County Employees Retirement System

The City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System

Minnesota State Retirement System

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio

Report on the Actuarial Valuation of the Health Insurance Credit Program

C AROLINA D EPARTMENT OF S TATE T REASURER N ORTH. Dear Fellow North Carolinians:

Anne Arundel County Fire Service Retirement Plan

Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio

Anne Arundel County Employees Retirement Plan

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

Respectfully submitted,

Sample Notes to the Financial Statements Cost-Sharing Employer Plans VRS Teacher Retirement Plan For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

2012 Spring Conference. Retirement and OPEB Plans -What s Changing Here (Virginia) And There (Other States) May 24, 2012

GASB STATEMENT NO. 67 REPORT

CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH FIREFIGHTERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL IMPACT STATEMENT #2 (MEMBERS USE EXCESS STATE MONIES RESERVE) March 14, 2017

November 6, Board of Trustees State Universities Retirement System of Illinois 1901 Fox Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820

June 19, Compute the City s recommended contribution rate for the Fiscal Year beginning July 1, 2015.

Re: Public Education Employee Retirement System of Missouri ("PEERS") Cost Estimate of Proposed Benefit Changes

WYOMING JUDICIAL RETI R E M E N T S Y S T E M ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T FOR T H E Y E A R B E G I N N I N G J A N U A R Y 1,

Bills Being Recommended

This letter has been prepared pursuant to the engagement letter dated October 27, 2008, between

November Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

Minnesota State Retirement System. State Patrol Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

Introduction 1-2. Summary of Results and Comments 3-15

Teachers Pension and Annuity Fund of New Jersey. Experience Study July 1, 2006 June 30, 2009

NC Department of Public Safety. Orientation Manual Page: 24

Virginia Retirement System Modernization and Pension Reform Changes

March 25, Mr. Randall Blum Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

September 15, Mr. Randall Blum Deputy Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

December Mr. Randall Blum Finance Director City of Eastpointe Eastpointe, Michigan Dear Mr. Blum:

RETIREMENT PLAN FOR T H E E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T FUND OF THE CITY OF D A L L A S ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF D E C E M B E R

LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS YOUR RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Actuarial Basics. Presented by Mike Overley, Regional Manager Tony Radjenovich, Regional Manager

The City of Cranston Fire and Police Department Pension Plans

Transcription:

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session 2015 Legislative Retirement Note BILL NUMBER: SHORT TITLE: SPONSOR(S): House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 2015 Appropriations Act. Representatives Dollar, L. Johnson, McGrady, and Lambeth FUNDS AFFECTED: State General Fund, State Highway Fund, other State employer receipts SYSTEM OR PROGRAM AFFECTED: Teachers and State Employees Retirement System (TSERS), Consolidated Judicial Retirement System (CJRS), Legislative Retirement System (LRS), Separate Insurance Benefits Plan (SIBP), special separation allowance, and the National Guard Pension Fund (NGPF). BILL SUMMARY: Section 30.21: Grants cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) of two percent (2%), effective July 1, 2015, for retirees in the TSERS, CJRS, and LRS. Section 30.23: Defines a probation/parole officer for retirement benefit purposes and changes the definition of law-enforcement officer in G.S. 135-1(11c) to include probation/parole officers with respect to service rendered on or after July 1, 2015. Changing the definition of law-enforcement officer has the following impacts in other areas of the General Statutes: G.S. 135-5(b19) says A member who is a law enforcement officer will be eligible for unreduced retirement at age 55 with 5 years of service as a law-enforcement officer or reduced retirement at age 50 with 15 years of service as a law-enforcement officer. Because G.S. 135-5 is in the same chapter as G.S. 135-1(11c), changing the definition of law-enforcement officer extends those retirement age provisions to probation/parole officers. G.S. 143-166.41(a) says that the separation allowance is available to every sworn lawenforcement officer as defined by G.S. 135-1(11c). By changing the definition in G.S. 135-1(11c), this section causes probation/parole officers to start earning service toward the separation allowance. While only service on or after July 1, 2015 counts toward the requirement to have 5 years of law enforcement service immediately prior to retirement, probation/parole officer service prior to July 1, 2015 will count toward the requirement that half of an employee s career be as a law enforcement officer. G.S. 143-166.60 says that the SIBP is established for all law enforcement officers, as defined in G.S. 135-1(11c) By changing the definition in G.S. 135-1(11c), the bill makes probation/parole officers eligible for the SIBP. House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 1

The bill does not change the definition of law enforcement officer in G.S. 143-166.30(a)(4). That is the definition that applies to the NC 401(k) Plan. Thus, the bill does not extend the lawenforcement 401(k) benefits to probation/parole officers. Because the bill only changes the definition of law-enforcement officer with respect to service rendered on or after July 1, 2015, most probation/parole officers would have to work for at least five more years to be eligible to retire at a different age or receive the separation allowance. Section 30.24: Amends G.S. 127A-40 to increase the monthly benefit in the NGPF to $105 for 20 years of service and $10.50 for each additional year of service, up to a maximum of $210. The benefit is currently $99 for 20 years of service and $9.90 for each additional year of service, up to a maximum of $198. No other sections of the bill modify retirement benefits or statutes. EFFECTIVE DATE: All of these sections are effective July 1, 2015 ESTIMATED IMPACT ON STATE: Section 30.21 Buck Consultants, the actuary for the TSERS, CJRS, and LRS, estimates that the provisions of this bill will have an annual cost in FY 2015-16 and subsequent years as follows: TSERS CJRS LRS Percent of Payroll 0.78% 1.28% 1.60% General Fund $ 77,329,200 $ 908,800 $ 57,920 Highway Fund $ 2,457,000 $ 0 $ 0 Receipt Funds $ 33,015,224 $ 0 $ 0 Total Annual Cost $ 112,801,424 $ 908,800 $ 57,920 Buck Consultants estimates that this Section will increase the unfunded liability of TSERS by roughly $758 million, a little over 1% of the accrued liability of $65,806 million. The TSERS liability was 94.8% funded at the end of 2013. The additional unfunded liability is projected to be paid off over 12 years by the increased contributions shown above. Hartman & Associates, the actuary for the General Assembly, estimates that the provisions of this bill will have an annual cost in FY 2015-16 and subsequent years as follows: TSERS CJRS LRS Percent of Payroll 0.76% 1.26% 1.56% General Fund $ 75,346,400 $ 894,600 $ 56,472 Highway Fund $ 2,394,000 $ 0 $ 0 Receipt Funds $ 32,168,680 $ 0 $ 0 Total Annual Cost $ 109,909,080 $ 894,600 $ 56,472 House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 2

The figures above assume that no actuarial gains are used to cover the cost of the COLA provisions. TSERS and CJRS have sufficient gains available to cover a portion of the cost of the COLA and the bill uses those gains for that purpose. Section 30.23 Buck Consultants, the actuary for the Retirement System, estimates that the change to the TSERS retirement ages will result in an increase in the annual required contribution of 0.02% of payroll, or $2.0 million from the General Fund. Buck estimates an increase in the SIBP liability of $0.1 million, which would not eliminate the surplus in the SIBP. Buck also estimated negligible decreases in the contributions and/or liability for the Disability Income Plan and Death Benefit Plan due to the expected change in retirement patterns. Hartman & Associates, the actuary for the General Assembly, estimates that the change to the TSERS retirement ages will result in an increase in the annual required contribution of 1.39% of the probation/parole officer payroll, or roughly $1.0 million. Hartman & Associates estimates an increase in the SIBP liability of $0.2 million, which would not eliminate the surplus in the SIBP. The actuaries estimated the following cash flow impact due to the additional separation allowances: Year Buck Consultants Hartman & Associates FY 2015-16 $0 $0 FY 2016-17 $0 $0 FY 2017-18 $0 $0 FY 2018-19 $0 $0 FY 2019-20 $0 $0 The separation allowances paid after FY 2020-21 would be expected to increase as retiring probation/parole officers become eligible for the benefit. Estimates for the 5 years following the years shown in the table are not available based on the wording in Section 30.23, but based on other estimates the additional annual payouts are expected to be less than $3 million in each year. Section 30.24 Buck Consultants, the actuary for the NGPF, and Hartman & Associates, the actuary for the General Assembly, estimate that the provisions of Section 30.24 will increase the normal cost and accrued liability contributions in FY 2015-16 and subsequent years as follows: Buck Consultants Hartman & Associates Normal Cost $ 32,214 $ 32,000 Accrued Liability Contribution $ 1,161,150 $ 1,161,000 Total Annual Cost $ 1,193,364 $ 1,193,000 The contributions above are paid entirely from the General Fund. House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 3

Appropriations The bill appropriates funds and sets contribution rates sufficient to cover the increased cost of these three sections and contribute the amount recommended by the actuary to properly fund existing benefits. ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGY: The cost estimates of the System's Actuary are based on the employee data, actuarial assumptions and actuarial methods used to prepare the December 31, 2013 actuarial valuations. Significant membership and financial statistics, assumptions, and methods are shown in the following tables: Membership Statistics (as of 12/31/2013 unless otherwise noted, M = millions) TSERS CJRS LRS NGPF Active Members Count 310,370 566 170 5,535 General Fund Compensation $9,914M $71M $4M Valuation Compensation (Total) $13,608M $71M $4M Not applicable Average Age 45 55 57 38 Average Service 10.6 13.1 5.9 15.9 Inactive Members Count 125,513 53 94 5,117 Retired Members Count 187,448 584 311 4,354 Annual Benefits $3,871M $35M $2M $8M Average Age 70 72 76 70 New Retirees During 2014 11,500 30 3 150 Financial Statistics (as of 12/31/2013 unless otherwise noted, M = millions) TSERS CJRS LRS NGPF Accrued Liability (AL) $65,806M $549M $25M $140M Actuarial Value of Assets $62,364M $507M $29M $103M (AVA) Market Value of Assets $62,789M $512M $30M $104M (MVA) Unfunded Accrued Liability $3,442M $43M ($5M) $37M (AL - AVA) Funded Status (AVA / AL) 95% 92% 119% 74% Annual Required 8.69% 26.37% 1.80% $5.9M Contribution (ARC) for FY 2015-16 (as % of pay) Assumed Rate of Investment Return 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% 7.25% House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 4

Salary Increase Assumption (includes 3.50% inflation and productivity) Cost Method 4.25% - 9.10% 5.00% - 5.95% 7.50% Not applicable Entry Age Normal Projected Unit Credit Projected Unit Credit Amortization 12 year, 12 year, 8 year, open, closed, flat $ closed, flat $ flat $ Demographic assumptions based on 2005-2009 experience, RP-2000 mortality with age adjustments, and projection of future mortality improvement with scale AA Entry Age Normal 12 year, closed, flat $ Benefit Provisions Formula Unreduced retirement age/service Employee contribution (as % of pay) TSERS CJRS LRS NGPF 3.02% to 4.02% 4.02% $99 to $198 x Service x Service per month x Final Pay x Highest 1.82% x Service x 4 Year Avg Pay Any/30; 60/25; 65 (55 for LEO)/5 Pay 50/24; 65/5 65/5 60/20 6% 6% 7% None Further detailed information concerning these assumptions and methods is shown in the actuary's report, which is available upon request from David Vanderweide. SOURCES OF DATA: Buck Consultants, Teachers and State Employees Retirement System of North Carolina, Report on the Seventy-First Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013, October 2, 2014, which is available on the Department of State Treasurer website. Buck Consultants, Consolidated Judicial Retirement System of North Carolina, Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013, October 2, 2014, which is available on the Department of State Treasurer website. Buck Consultants, Legislative Retirement System of North Carolina, Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2013, October 6, 2014, which is available on the Department of State Treasurer website. Hartman & Associates, LLC, 1% COLA for Retirees in the TSERS, LGERS, CJRS, and LRS Systems, March 10, 2015, original of which is on file in the General Assembly s Fiscal Research Division. Buck Consultants, Probation/Parole Officers Retirement (House Bill 555), April 10, 2015, original of which is on file in the General Assembly s Fiscal Research Division. House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 5

Hartman & Associates, LLC, House Bill 555: An Act to Enhance the Benefits of Probation/Parole Officers Who Are Members of the TSERS, April 8, 2015, original of which is on file in the General Assembly s Fiscal Research Division. Buck Consultants, Actuarial Impact of $6 Benefit Increase for the North Carolina National Guard Pension Fund, May 15, 2015, original of which is on file in the General Assembly s Fiscal Research Division. Hartman & Associates, LLC, Increase Maximum Pension for Retired Members of the North Carolina National Guard, May 15, 2015, original of which is on file in the General Assembly s Fiscal Research Division. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS: FISCAL RESEARCH DIVISION: (919) 733-4910. The above information is provided in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 120-114 and applicable rules of the North Carolina Senate and House of Representatives. PREPARED BY: David Vanderweide APPROVED BY: Mark Trogdon, Director Fiscal Research Division DATE: May 21, 2015 Signed Copy Located in the NCGA Principal Clerk's Offices House Bill 97 (Third Edition) 6