Economic Capital Modeling

Similar documents
ERM Tools & Techniques 2007 ERM Symposium ERM Essentials Workshop Francis P. Sabatini

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

American Academy of Actuaries Webinar: The Practice of ERM in the Insurance Industry. Enterprise Risk Management Committee November 19, 2013

Enterprise Risk Management

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

Solvency II Insights for North American Insurers. CAS Centennial Meeting Damon Paisley Bill VonSeggern November 10, 2014

ORSA An International Development

The Challenges of Solvency II

Least Squares Monte Carlo (LSMC) life and annuity application Prepared for Institute of Actuaries of Japan

Critical Reflection of Two State-of-the-Art Risk Management Frameworks (SRM004)

Own Risk and Solvency Assessment

RED 2.1 & 4.2: Quantifying Risk Exposure for ORSA. Moderator: Presenters: Lesley R. Bosniack, CERA, FCAS, MAAA

ECONOMIC CAPITAL MODELING CARe Seminar JUNE 2016

MODELLING INSURANCE BUSINESS IN PROPHET UNDER IFRS 17

New Actuarial Standards of Practice No. 46 Risk Evaluation in ERM No. 47 Risk Treatment in ERM

ERM and ORSA Assuring a Necessary Level of Risk Control

ERM/ORSA Training Thai General Insurance Association (TGIA)

Embedding Stress Testing as Part of an Integrated Risk Management Framework

ERM and Reserve Risk

Article from: Risk Management. March 2014 Issue 29

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Enterprise Risk Management Individual Life & Annuities Extension Exam ERM-ILA

ERM Implementation and the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)

US Life Insurer Stress Testing

Exploring the New Era of ORSA Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)/ Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Committee

NAIC OWN RISK AND SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT (ORSA) GUIDANCE MANUAL

OIC & ORSA. Thanita Anusonadisai Director of Capital and Solvency Standard Department Office of Insurance Commission, Thailand

Own Risk Solvency Assessment (ORSA) Linking Risk Management, Capital Management and Strategic Planning

Keeping Pace With Solvency II

SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB European Embedded Value

Capturing Risk Appetite Through ERM - Implementation Challenges

Economic Capital. Implementing an Internal Model for. Economic Capital ACTUARIAL SERVICES

Economic Capital: Recent Market Trends and Best Practices for Implementation

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Enterprise Risk Management General Insurance Extension Exam ERM-GI

SWEDBANK FÖRSÄKRING AB European Embedded Value

Guideline. Own Risk and Solvency Assessment. Category: Sound Business and Financial Practices. No: E-19 Date: November 2015

Session 2: Value Management under a Risk-Based Capital Regime. Moderator: Mark W Griffin FSA,CERA. Presenters: Thomas C Wilson

Life under Solvency II Be prepared!

Economic Capital Modeling Implementation

Advancements in Implementing Operational Risk, Stress Testing and Risk Appetite for ORSA Institute of Actuaries of Japan

ILA LRM Model Solutions Fall Learning Objectives: 1. The candidate will demonstrate an understanding of the principles of Risk Management.

Enterprise Risk Management. University of Nebraska Max J. Rudolph, FSA CFA CERA Rudolph Financial Consulting, LLC February 15, 2008

Emerging Trends in Quantitative ERM

ORSA: Prospective Solvency Assessment and Capital Projection Modelling

Milliman STAR Solutions - NAVI

Economic Capital Follow-up from November 12 ERRC

Session 3B: Stress Testing from Macro-environment, to Scenario to Impacts and Decision. Moderator: Dariush A. Akhtari, FSA, MAAA, FCIA

Solvency projections: what s the point unless you get some value from the results?

Market Risk Disclosures For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013

Statement of Guidance for Licensees seeking approval to use an Internal Capital Model ( ICM ) to calculate the Prescribed Capital Requirement ( PCR )

The ORSA opportunity:

Overview and context

Guidance paper on the use of internal models for risk and capital management purposes by insurers

Risk and capital management: the changing environment

Guidance Note System of Governance - Insurance Transition to Governance Requirements established under the Solvency II Directive

UNIQA Insurance Group AG. Group Embedded Value 2017

Market Risk Disclosures For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2014

CASE STUDY DEPOSIT GUARANTEE FUNDS

Principles of Scenario Planning Under Solvency II. George Tyrakis Solutions Specialist

Session 3B, Stochastic Investment Planning. Presenters: Paul Manson, CFA. SOA Antitrust Disclaimer SOA Presentation Disclaimer

Risk Appetite. What is risk appetite?

Sections of the ORSA Report

Academy Presentation to NAIC ORSA Implementation (E) Subgroup

IAIS: Enterprise Risk Management for Capital Adequacy & Solvency Purposes. George Brady. IAIS Deputy Secretary General

We referred to ICP 20 which deals with public disclosures and is therefore directly comparable to the SFCR.

2004 European Embedded Value for Life & Savings activities. December 12, 2005

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

by Aurélie Reacfin s.a. March 2016

ERM in the Rating Process: A Practical Perspective

Embedded Value for Insurance Company

Guidance consultation FSA REVIEWS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT BY CCPS. Financial Services Authority. July Dear Sirs

BERMUDA INSURANCE (GROUP SUPERVISION) RULES 2011 BR 76 / 2011

Enterprise Risk Management Symposium. Embedding ERM in the DNA of an insurer

SOLVENCY II INSIGHTS FOR NORTH AMERICAN INSURERS. CAS Centennial Meeting Melissa Salton November 10, 2014

LEGAL & GENERAL GROUP PLC risk management supplement

Solvency II. Building an internal model in the Solvency II context. Montreal September 2010

DEVELOPING A GROUP CAPITAL CALCULATION

CAPITAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE

Embrace the Solvency II internal model

A (personal) view. Philip Whittingham, European Chief Enterprise Risk Officer. 22 March 2010

ORSA An international requirement

ASSET-LIABILITY MANAGEMENT AND STRESS TESTING - GUIDELINES ON ASSET LIABILITY MANAGEMENT REPORTING

Stress Testing Beyond DCAT

CATTOLICA LIFE DAC SOLVENCY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT 31 ST DECEMBER 2017

Terms of Reference Risk Committee. Prepared by: Company Secretary Version Date: 16/03/2017

Growing the Value Capital & Risk Management

Solvency II: Implementation Challenges & Experiences Learned

General questions 1. Are there areas not addressed in the Guidance that should be considered in assessing risk culture?

International Trends in Regulatory Capital & Target Surplus. Caroline Bennet - Trowbridge Deloitte Jennifer Lang - CBA

Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA)

The New Risk-Based Capital

SOCIETY OF ACTUARIES Enterprise Risk Management Investment Extension Exam ERM-INV

LLOYD S MINIMUM STANDARDS

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE SUPERVISORS

GUIDELINE ON ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT

An Overview of the Enterprise Risk Management Process

Group risk management update

The Changing face of ERM: The Insurance Company s Perspective

Subject ST9 Enterprise Risk Management Syllabus

Does the ORSA add value? Challenges and initial achievements. Lukas Ziewer Risk Management Perspectives, 18/11/2014

How to review an ORSA

Transcription:

Economic Capital Modeling Proxy Model Implementation Experience Clint Thompson Chief Risk Officer, Hannover Life Reassurance Co. of America ERM Symposium June 2015

Agenda 1. Risk appetite and linkage to economic capital modeling 2. Overview of types of economic capital models 3. Hannover Life Re America proxy modeling implementation experience 2

Risk Appetite Everything in ERM links back to overall risk appetite (that s why there s an E in ERM) Corporate Strategy & Risk Strategy (Appetite) are set at Group and Local board levels 3

Risk Appetite Hannover Life Reassurance Co. of America has 5 core risk appetite statements: 1. Minimum expected return on capital 2. Minimum expected intrinsic value creation (change in present value of earnings less cost of capital) 3. Positive economic capital solvency ratio 4. Positive current and stressed regulatory capital ratio 5. Adequate collateral and liquidity in current and stressed scenarios These risk appetite statements are very much aligned between group and local management and entity levels. Risk report and compliance is standing agenda item for Board of Directors. Risk committee owns and manages the System of Limits and Thresholds that link tolerances for all the relevant risks back to the core appetite statement. Our economic capital models are foundational to measuring many aspects of the enterprise risks we are exposed to in our business model Quality timely models are therefore key to a successful & effective ERM framework 4

Model Governance in Practice Requirements and uses for models are only growing 5

Models in Practice Requirements and uses for economic capital models are only growing Risk management Pricing of new business Inforce analysis & steering Regulatory valuation (Solvency II) Asset-liability management Financial planning Internal economic balance sheet ORSA and prospective solvency assessment 6

Model Governance in Practice Model runs, control, validation, and governance is multi-layered and time consuming Primary Owner Internal Control Framework Secondary Oversight Internal Audit Senior Mgmt External Audit Board NB / Transaction Pricing Internal Economic Balance Sheet Internal Economic Capital Pricing Actuary Financial reporting actuary Risk management Actuary Business Process & IT system controls, reporting, and documenta tion Risk management Risk management Peer Reviews and validation back to business models Processindepend ent quality assurance CEO & CFO Business Unit heads Risk Committee External independ ent quality assurance (Currently utilized primarily for externally disclosed IFRS & Statutory) Board of Directors and Audit Committee Establishes and Approves risk and internal control frameworks 7

Hannover Re's Economic Model and Other Approaches Hannover Re s internal capital model starts with stochastic cash flow projections over many combinations of scenarios across all variations of risk drivers (mortality, morbidity, financial markets, property and casualty, etc.) The dependencies and interactions between all the different risk drivers are built into the many scenarios using copulas and other dependency modeling techniques Many scenarios are required at the Group level given the myriad risk drivers (~100 thousand) The life and health business centers need to produce ~2,500 scenarios to capture potential variation for life and health specific risks. Separate model runs with additional risk neutral scenarios are used to value financial options and guarantees for product lines where relevant. Our scenario approach generates a full probability distribution of results and enables bottom-up valuation of diversification benefits. Results are aggregated and used for different purposes at asset, liability, product type, business center, entity, and Group level. There are other approaches to economic capital models 1. Regulatory capital ratios at risk across selected scenarios 2. Run-off cash flow testing approach to assess initial total balance sheet requirements 3. Solvency II style (value at risk, 99.5% confidence, economic valuation) but using a few independent stress scenarios and then a correlation matrix to combine (rather than bottom-up many-scenario interaction approach) 8

Need for Proxy Model Hannover Re s internal economic capital and balance sheet model has been developed over many years and is now deeply integrated into most aspects of the business In some ways the economic capital model is a victim of its own success because results now need to be generated faster and more frequently with more time for analysis and explanations for use in business steering and Solvency II compliance Results that are produced after-the-fact are not as useful and may result in missing the boat in terms of both identifying opportunities and management of risks 9

Proxy Model Overview Proxy models are one example of how companies are focusing on producing materially correct results more quickly and efficiently Generically proxy models are light models that are periodically calibrated from the real heavy models. They run much faster and can be integrated into production reporting cycles more easily. Traditional generalized regression proxy models don t work for us. The non-linear effects and interactions are difficult to capture accurately in one model; but we don t give up easily. We (finally) found an approach that can quickly generate 1000 s of new scenarios for different combinations of stresses and economic environments from previously run seeds Liabilities across stresses and scenarios are complex 10