Natural Gas & Electricity Procurement Program

Similar documents
Natural Gas & Electricity Procurement Program

Natural Gas & Electricity Procurement Program

Derivatives Use Report

Derivatives Use Report

Business & Financial Services December 2017

Derivatives Use Report

Large Commercial Rate Simplification

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2017 compared to March 2016.

FUEL PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY REPORT "FUEL HEDGE"

FUEL PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY REPORT "FUEL HEDGE"

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at January 2018 compared to January 2017.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at September 2017 compared to September 2016.

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 85/14 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) July 24, 2014

The year to date is less than budget and prior year by 15.4 million and 11.6 million, respectively.

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at June 2018 compared to June 2017.

Energy Budgeting and Procurement: Securing Stable Energy Prices in Today s Volatile Markets

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at March 2018 compared to March 2017.

Additional Agenda. City of Mississauga. General Committee. Date June 27, 2018 Time 9:00 A.M. Location Council Chamber 2 nd Floor 300 City Centre Drive

HUD NSP-1 Reporting Apr 2010 Grantee Report - New Mexico State Program

DECEMBER KPI REPORT. Service Provider SLA Performance Core and Non-Core Settlement Systems Core and Non-Core BSC Systems. Supplier Performance

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at February 2017 compared to February 2016.

CONTENTS COMMENTARY CHARTS TABLES GLOSSARY. Section 1: Headline Inflation Section 2: Core Inflation

Optimizing FX Risk Management Using Options

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at December 2017 compared to December 2016.

Financial & Business Highlights For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Economic Activity Index ( GDB-EAI ) For the month of May 2013 G O V E R N M E N T D E V E L O P M E N T B A N K F O R P U E R T O R I C O

Common stock prices 1. New York Stock Exchange indexes (Dec. 31,1965=50)2. Transportation. Utility 3. Finance

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at August 2018 compared to August 2017.

Regional overview Gisborne

PARADISE IRRIGATION DISTRICT

City of Joliet 2014 Revenue Review. October 2013

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana Low Load Factor (LLF) customers December 2016

AEP REPORTS 2016 FIRST-QUARTER EARNINGS; PERFORMANCE ON TRACK DESPITE MILD WEATHER FOR THE QUARTER

General Fund Revenue

Chapter 6. Solution: Austin Electronics. State of Economy Sales Probability

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana High Load Factor (HLF) customers December 2016

Cash & Liquidity The chart below highlights CTA s cash position at July 2016 compared to July 2015.

NATIONAL SUMMARY OF FIRST-TIME CLAIMANTS FOR UI

Regional overview Hawke's Bay

Monthly Broker Webinar. November 12, 2014

Review of Registered Charites Compliance Rates with Annual Reporting Requirements 2016

Key IRS Interest Rates After PPA

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 147/09 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) October 29, 2009

Commodity and Interest Rate Hedging Overview

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report November 2018

Electric price outlook for Indiana Low Load Factor (LLF) customers February 2013

March 2019 ARP Rate Call Package

FDD FIRM STORAGE SERVICE NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY

XML Publisher Balance Sheet Vision Operations (USA) Feb-02

Quarterly Financial Review

RWE s Commodity Risk Management

Arise Windpower AB. Company presentation February 2013

Executive Summary. July 17, 2015

Derivatives Use Report

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report December 2017

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report December 2016

Managing Risk of a Power Generation Portfolio

(Internet version) Financial & Statistical Report September 2017

Big Walnut Local School District

BMO Mutual Funds 2017

AEP REPORTS 2017 FIRST-QUARTER EARNINGS; PERFORMANCE ON TRACK DESPITE MILD WEATHER FOR THE QUARTER

The Australian national electricity market

Spheria Australian Smaller Companies Fund

MESA ROYALTY TRUST FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION

U.S. Natural Gas Storage Charts

Derivatives Use Report

Continuing Disclosure Report Supplement: Prepared by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board

FOR RELEASE: MONDAY, MARCH 21 AT 4 PM

First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. May 2, 2018

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 81/10 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) July 28, 2010

SaskEnergy Commodity Rate 2011 Review and Natural Gas Market Update

Regional overview Auckland

FY2014 Operating Budget Performance Report

WESTWOOD LUTHERAN CHURCH Summary Financial Statement YEAR TO DATE - February 28, Over(Under) Budget WECC Fund Actual Budget

Search - Finance Home - Yahoo! - Help. More Info: Quote News Reports SEC

Contact: Marybeth Flater FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Exelon Investor Relations

Electric Price Outlook for Indiana High Load Factor (HLF) customers September 2015

Affordable Care Act Implementation Alert

Matthew F. Hilzinger Chief Financial Officer

Contact: JaCee Burnes FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Exelon Investor Relations

DTE Energy reports third quarter 2008 earnings

Media Release 9 th March 2015

Contact: Chaka Patterson FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Investor Relations

Management Reports. June for PREPARED BY POWERED BY

Purpose The purpose of the Controller s Report is to provide summarized financial information on a monthly basis to the Board of Directors.

Table of Contents. Page 1-3 Page 4-5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8-10 Page 11

Exelon Announces Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2006 Results and Continued Superior Nuclear Operating Performance

2014 F-22 Raptor Fighter Jet

CPA Australia Plan Your Own Enterprise Competition

EB Union Gas January 1, 2019 QRAM Application

Quarterly Financial Review First Quarter 2003

The Summary of Financial Results for FY2016

MANAGING NATURAL GAS PRICE VOLATILITY

Credit Suisse 5 th Annual Industrials Conference November 29, 2017

Proposed Direction to Bord Gáis Energy Supply regarding the application of the Regulated Tariff Formula

Gas storage: overview and static valuation

Washington Gas Light Company Utility Rate Requests District of Columbia Formal Case No Decision May 15, 2013

Fiscal Year 2010 Packwood Annual Operating Budget

Schedule of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position (Income Statement) Page 4

Docket No. DE Dated: 06/16/2017 Attachment CJG-1 Page 1

Transcription:

Reported to the Board of Trustees May 31, 2012 Natural Gas & Electricity Procurement Program Status Report to the Board of Trustees May 31, 2012

PROGRESS TO DATE The procurement activity under the Board approved Natural Gas Cost Management Policy began in August 2008. At its March 2009 meeting, the Board approved the Energy Cost Management Policy ( Policy ) to replace the Natural Gas Cost Management Policy. The new policy expanded purchasing authority to include other energy commodities (electricity and coal) and expanded the timeframe to a rolling three-year period. Through March 2012 progress continues to be made in securing natural gas and electricity at a fixed price for fiscal years 2013-2015. All transactions have been reviewed by the Energy Management Committee ( Committee ). The University expects FY12 total fuel costs to be less than FY12 fuel budget at year end, in part due to the unseasonably warm weather experienced during this fiscal year. NATURAL GAS The natural gas transactions were executed using forward fixed-price purchase contracts with Sequent Energy Management. No futures contracts or other derivative products were employed. Recent refinements to the process governed by the Energy Cost Management Policy included new terminology that assists in clarifying the amounts of gas allowed to be hedged. The new term, Hedgeable Volumes, is campus specific. The term Hedgeable Volumes for the UIUC campus is defined as 75% of Must-Run natural gas for the operational month. The term Hedgeable Volumes for the UIC campus is defined as 55% of the Total Gas Requirements for the operational month. Table 1 below summarizes the Natural Gas hedging transactions through March 2012. Table 1: Summary of Natural Gas Procurement Program Thru 3/31/12 unless otherwise noted FY2011 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 Volumes Committed to Date 5,423,247 5,221,348 4,225,963 3,204,372 1,769,777 Percent of Total Gas Budget Committed 90.3% 77.8% 73.8% 56.0% 30.9% Landed Price (per mmbtu) $ 7.10 $ 6.51 $ 6.18 $ 4.95 $ 4.71 Total $ Committed to Date (millions) $ 38.51 $ 33.99 $ 26.13 $ 15.87 $ 8.33 1 Landed Price = field price + basis + Nicor Enerchange fee + NGPL fees. 1

A graphical analysis of FY12 natural gas cost and volume activity is included on the following pages. FY13-FY15 activity is reported in Table 1 above. The graphs included in this report present the natural gas hedging pricing activity as directed by the Policy and the inherent impact of any changes to the demand forecast on the total procurement activity. The Total Gas Costs Graph presents a comparison between the actual delivered cost of total gas required and the delivered cost of the hedge gas commitments providing a view of the financial impact of the Policy. The total gas budget is included to highlight the budget to actual results. Total Gas Costs $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $4,000,000 Total Budget Costs $3,000,000 Actual Costs $2,000,000 Hedge Costs $1,000,000 $- Total Budget is defined as all natural gas anticipated to be consumed during each month. Natural gas transactions continue to result in below budget costs through March 2012. Total Budget Costs through March 2012 is $34.5m with Actual Costs equaling $31.6m providing an 8% favorable variance. 2

The Budget Volume Analysis Graph presents the total gas volumes budgeted, separated between hedge gas commitments and the amount of expected spot purchases required to meet the University s total natural gas requirements. The graph is intended to provide a view of the gas hedging activity as directed by the Policy and the inherent impact of any changes to the demand forecast on the total procurement activity. Actual volumes consumed are included to highlight the budget to actual results. 900,000 Budget Volume Analysis 800,000 700,000 Expected Spot Volumes 600,000 500,000 Hedge Volumes 400,000 300,000 Actual Volumes 200,000 100,000 0-100,000 Hedge Volumes plus Expected Spot Volumes is defined as all natural gas anticipated to be consumed during each month. Differences between Hedged Volumes and Actual Volumes is a result of purchases or sales made in the spot market to satisfy the natural gas requirements. Asset availability also affects the variance. Actual volumes burned through March 2012 are approximately 10% less than budget. 3

The Price Comparison $/MMBTU Graph presents a comparison between the per-unit delivered cost of the hedge gas commitments and the actual per-unit delivered cost of total gas burned (hedge purchases plus spot purchases) providing a view of the impact of the spot market transactions on the effective per-unit price of natural gas. The total gas budget price is included to highlight the budget to actual results. Although the per unit price through March 2012 is slightly higher (see graph notes) total costs are below budget by almost $3.0m. $7.80 $7.40 $7.00 $6.60 $6.20 $5.80 $5.40 $5.00 $4.60 Price Comparison $/MMBTU FY 2012 Total Budget Gas Price Actual Gas Price Landed Hedge Price The Total Budget Gas Price is defined as the blended price of the hedging activity and the expected spot purchases. Differences between Hedge Price and Actual Gas Price is a result of purchases or sales made in the spot market to satisfy the natural gas requirements. Asset availability also affects the variance. The Actual Gas Price is less than Hedge Price in some months due to daily spot prices being less than hedged price. The average Total Budget price of natural gas for FY 2012 is $6.56/mmbtu while the average Actual Gas Price through March 2012 is $6.84/mmbtu. This higher actual price per unit is due in part to the unseasonably warm weather which has decreased the volumes required which in turn has caused hedged gas to be sold back at a lower price than the original purchase price. 4

The Cumulative Mark to Market Graph provides a review of the cumulative difference between the market price of natural gas and the forward contract prices paid by the University for all open contracts as of March 2012. CUMULATIVE MARK-TO-MARKET GAIN/LOSS $2,000,000 $0 -$2,000,000 -$4,000,000 -$6,000,000 -$8,000,000 -$10,000,000 -$12,000,000 -$14,000,000 University of Illinois 2011-2012 Prairieland 2012 2013 Prairieland 2013 2014 Prairieland 2014 2015 Mark to Market depicts the unrealized cumulative difference between the market price and the hedge price. The university initiated its hedging program when prices were relatively high versus today s prices but as the program continues the difference is decreasing. ELECTRICITY The electricity transactions were executed using fixed price block purchases with American Electric Power Service Corp and Exelon Generation. Fixed price block purchases of electricity have been contracted for delivery during fiscal years 2012-2014 as outlined in Table 2 below. No futures contracts or other derivative products were employed. Block Electricity Purchasing Activity through March 31, 2012 FY2013 FY2014 UIUC UIC UIUC UIC UIUC UIC Volumes Committed to Date (mwh) 105,900 109,967 87,256 76,190 21,088 9,509 % of Forecasted Electric Load 24.56% 34.42% 20.73% 23.85% 5.01% 2.98% Total Dollars Committed (millions) $3.19 $3.64 $2.68 $2.59 $0.77 $0.37 Block Price for Committed Volumes ($/mwh) $30.09 $33.08 $30.75 $34.02 $36.44 $38.60 Table 2: Summary of Electricity Procurement Program 5

A graphical analysis of FY12 electricity cost and volume activity is included in the following pages. FY13-FY14 activity is reported in the above Table 2. These campus specific graphs present the power hedging activity as directed by the Policy and the inherent impact of any changes to the demand forecast on the total procurement activity. The graphs are presented as campus specific in order to replicate the procurement transactions which are campus specific. Graph 1 and Graph 2 present the results of all purchased electricity transactions for FY12 through March 2012. This now includes the electricity requirements of the Bluewaters Petascale Computer at UIUC. The total expected electricity load, the total load expected to be purchased and of that forecast how much has been purchased with fixed price block purchases are identified. Actual volumes consumed are included to highlight the budget to actual results. Graph 3 and Graph 4 present the results of all purchased electricity transactions for FY12 through March 2012. The costs of the total load expected to be purchased and the actual cost of volumes purchased electricity are included to highlight the budget to actual results. 6

Graph 1 UIUC Purchased Electricity - Volumes (KWH) 60,000,000 Total Expected Load 50,000,000 Total Purchases Forecast 40,000,000 30,000,000 Block Purchases 20,000,000 Actual Purchased KWH Consumed 10,000,000 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Differences between Block Purchases and Total Purchases Forecast is a result of purchases that are expected to be made in the spot market to satisfy the campus electricity requirements based on the operating plans. Actual consumption of purchased electricity through March 2012 is approximately 34% less than budgeted purchased electricity. Graph 2 UIC Purchased Electricity - Volumes (KWH) 35,000,000 30,000,000 Total Expected Load 25,000,000 20,000,000 Total Purchases Forecast 15,000,000 Block Purchases 10,000,000 Actual Purchased KWH Consumed 5,000,000 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Differences between Block Purchases and Total Purchases Forecast is a result of purchases that are expected to be made in the spot market to satisfy the campus electricity requirements based on the operating plans. Actual consumption of purchased electricity through March 2012 is approximately 6% less than budgeted purchased electricity. 7

Graph 3 UIUC Purchased Electricity Costs FY 2012 $2,000,000 $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 Forecasted Total Purchased Costs $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 Actual Total Purchased Costs $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Actual costs of purchased electricity through March 2012 are approximately 27% below budgeted purchases. The Mark to Market position for UIUC is slightly unfavorable by approximately $1.0m or 24%. Graph 4 UIC Purchased Electricity Costs $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 Forecasted Total Purchased Costs $1,000,000 $800,000 Actual Total Purchased Costs $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Actual costs of purchased electricity through March 2012 are approximately 5% less than budgeted purchases. The Mark to Market position is slightly unfavorable by approximately $600k or 20%. 8

PREVIOUSLY SUPPLIED BACKGROUND INFORMATION OVERVIEW At the September 2008 meeting of the Board of Trustees, Walter Knorr, Vice President/Chief Financial Officer and Comptroller, presented and received approval of the Natural Gas Cost Management Policy. Among other things, the policy authorized natural gas purchases for fiscal years 2010 and 2011, with certain restrictions. At its March 2009 meeting, the Board approved the Energy Cost Management Policy to replace the Natural Gas Cost Management Policy. The new policy expanded purchasing authority to include other energy commodities (electricity and coal) and expanded the timeframe to a rolling three-year period. A strategy for procuring natural gas and electricity within the policy framework was developed with assistance from our external advisors, Nicor Enerchange, Brubaker and Associates, Inc., and Larry Altenbaumer. The primary objectives of the strategy are to provide budget certainty and to stabilize the price of purchased fuel/energy to the University. The strategy has three primary components - (i) a rolling 36-month series of regularly timed purchases, (ii) budget management for the 36 months, and (iii) an opportunistic purchase program based on aggressive pricing targets. i. The program is designed to even out over time the University s exposure to the spot market and the risk of price spikes; it functions similarly to a dollar-cost averaging investment strategy. ii. The 36 month term provides a high degree of budget certainty (financial risk management) for the fiscal budget periods affected by allowing purchases up to 95% for the first 12 months, 90% for the second 12 months, and 85% for the third 12 months of the natural gas required to meet the University s thermal load. (See addition of definition, Hedgeable Volumes, on page 1 under Natural Gas Section) iii. The opportunistic purchases program incorporates a capability to increase purchases for a particular period. Consideration is based on variances between currently available market pricing and the established budgeted target price coupled with consideration of levels of actual committed purchases relative to target purchase commitments levels for the specified period. BACKGROUND ON SUPPLIERS Natural Gas Supply The forward purchase contracts for natural gas are with Nicor Enerchange, who stands between the University and the originating field suppliers. Nicor Enerchange is contractually responsible for covering damages if it fails to deliver the nominated amount of gas to 9

the University s specified delivery points under an existing agreement with the University that runs through June 2016. Nicor Enerchange is owned by Nicor, Inc. In December 2010, Nicor, Inc. was purchased by AGL Resources, Inc., an energy services holding company whose principal business is the distribution of natural gas in six states. Based on customer count, over 2.3m, AGL is the largest natural gas distributor in the Southeast and mid-atlantic regions. Natural Gas Transportation The natural gas referred to above is transported between the gas fields and the University by Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America ( NGPL ). NGPL owns in whole or in part over 10,000 miles of interstate pipelines and is a subsidiary of Kinder Morgan (one of the largest pipeline transportation and energy storage companies in North America with approximately 37,000 miles of pipelines). The two firm transportation agreements between the University and NGPL expire April 30, 2015 (MDQ of 5,000 MMBTU/day) and June 30, 2015 (MDQ of 10,000 MMBTU/day). The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company, a regulated local gas distribution company, provides transportation from the Chicago City Gate to the UIC campus and storage services under a contract which expires June 30, 2015. Power Supply Fixed price block purchases of electricity are transacted under a Master Power Purchase and Sale Agreement ( MPSSA ) between American Electric Power Service Corp. ( AEP ) and under a MPPSA with Exelon Generation for fiscal years 2011-2014. AEP, the parent, owns over 39,000 megawatts of generating capacity in the U.S. and a 39,000-mile transmission network that includes 2,116 miles of 765 kilovolt transmission lines. Exelon Generation has one of the industry s largest portfolios of electricity generation capacity, with a nationwide reach in the Midwest and MidAtlantic. It is the largest owner/operator of nuclear plants in the United States. Exelon, the parent company, has U.S. Generating Resources/Capacity of 31,003 megawatts (2009). Power Delivery Delivery of the contracted block purchases is provided by AmerenIP to the UIUC campus and by Commonwealth Edison to the UIC campus. The creditworthiness of these suppliers is monitored regularly to review their financial positions and to ensure counterparties do not become a risk to the University. This monitoring is consistent with the requirements of the Derivatives Use Policy approved by the Board of Trustees in July 2010. 10