Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction of Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited

Similar documents
Regulated Investment Companies

Hong Kong Rewrites Its Companies Ordinance

Real Estate Investment Trusts

Clearing Exemption for Inter-Affiliate Swaps

Corporate Expatriation Transactions

Tax Election to Treat Disposition of Stock of a Subsidiary as a Sale of Its Assets

IRS Finalizes Regulations Relating to Allocations of Partnership Items Involving Partners That Are Look-Through Entities

Depositary Receipts Program Payments

IRS Replaces Proposed Regulations on Disguised Sale Rules and Allocation of Partnership Liabilities

Bona Fide Hedge Exemptions for Commodity Swap Dealers

Corporate Expatriation Transactions

House and Senate Pass NOL Carryback Legislation

Corporate Reorganizations

Tax Reform and State and Local Taxation

New Disclosure Requirement for Derivatives Over Basket Positions That Are Controlled by the Counterparty

COBRADesk Same Day Clearance

Auction Rate Preferred Stock

New York State Paid Family Leave

Most of the provisions described below will be effective for tax years beginning after 2017.

Tax Reform Bill Proposes Significant Compensation Changes

Proposed Dodd-Frank Section 943 Rules

IRS Releases Initial Guidance on the 2017 Amendments to the Internal Revenue Code s Limitation on Deduction for Certain Executive Compensation

Proposed Dodd-Frank Section 945 Rules

Reporting Requirements for Foreign Financial Accounts Including Foreign Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

Final Regulations Ease Compliance with the Loss Trafficking Rules

Proposed Rules Under the Investment Advisers Act

Amendments to the New York Non-Profit Revitalization Act

SEC Guidance on Reporting for U.S. Tax Reform

German and Austrian Merger Control

CFTC Proposes to Amend CCO Rules

New SEC Staff Guidance on Shareholder Proposals

Proposed Treasury Exemption for Foreign Exchange Swaps and Forwards

SEC Work Plan for Consideration of IFRS Adoption

Money Market Fund Regulation

Proposed Roadmap For IFRS Adoption

Amendments to the UK Bank Levy Regime and its Interaction with French and German Bank Levies

SEC Exemptive Relief in Connection with Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Brexit: U.S. Agencies Facilitate Legacy Swap Transfers

Legislation Affecting Energy Trading: Recent Developments

SEC Provides Relief to Security-Based Swap Dealers From Business Conduct Rules

Judicial Deference to the IRS

Internal Revenue Service Directive to Examiners on Equity Swaps

Regulatory Capital Requirements

SEC Approves NYSE Proposal to Facilitate Listings of Companies Without a Trading History

Proposed Tax Extenders Legislation Would Limit Opco/Propco Spinoffs, Modify FIRPTA and Affect Treatment of REITs

Agencies Promulgate Final Regulations on Internet Gambling

Anti-Tax Haven Measures to be Introduced in France

Property Disclosure Rules for Mining Registrants

Security-Based Swap Execution Facilities

Economic Substance Doctrine: New Directive for IRS Examiners and Managers

Reporting Requirements for Foreign Financial Accounts

New York State Budget

Proposed Regulations Would Greatly Expand Reach of ERISA Fiduciary Exposure

SEC Reopens Comment Period on Proposed Rules Regarding Security-Based Swaps

UK Bank Levy. Rates and Update SUMMARY. December 13, 2010

ERISA Fiduciary Rule. Fifth Circuit Vacates New ERISA Fiduciary Rule SUMMARY BACKGROUND. March 19, 2018

Noncontrolling Investments in Banking Organizations

FINRA Corporate Financing

SEC Proposes Rule Regarding Communications Involving Security- Based Swaps Entered Into Solely by Eligible Contract Participants

SEC and CFTC Adopt Product Definitions Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Implementing Workforce Reductions

New York Department of Financial Services Addresses Use of External Consumer Data. and Information Sources in Underwriting for Life Insurance

President Obama s Fiscal Year 2012 Revenue Proposals

Court of Appeals Affirms NatWest Decisions

United States Withdraws from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran

Failed Bank Acquisitions

Money Market Fund Regulation

Tax Extenders 2015 SUMMARY. December 21, 2015

UK Controlled Foreign Company Rules and Taxation of Non-UK Branches

CFTC Exemptive Relief Upon Effective Date of Title VII of Dodd-Frank

SEC Finalizes Guidance to Stock Exchanges on Compensation Committee and Adviser Independence

European Commission Proposes Disclosure Requirements for Payments to Governments for the Development of Natural Resources

FATCA: Updates and Coordinating Regulations

Nasdaq Compensation Committee Independence Requirements

SEC Approves New PCAOB Auditing Standard Relating to Communications Between Auditors and Audit Committees

Conflicts of Interest in Securitizations

Corporate Disclosure of Government Enforcement Developments

NYSE Corporate Governance Standards

IRS Acquiesces in Xilinx Decision but only for Pre-2003 Cases

Creditability of Foreign Taxes

Royalty Rates for Standard-Essential Patents

Regulatory Capital Requirements

Mandatory CFIUS Filings for Foreign Investment in Specified Critical Technologies Companies

Ninth Circuit Holds That Non-U.S. Issuers Can Be Liable in U.S. for Unsponsored American Depositary Receipt Facility

Emergency SEC Orders Concerning Short Sales

President Obama s Fiscal Year 2012 Revenue Proposals

Proposed Assessment Rate Adjustment Guidelines for Large and Highly Complex Institutions

UK Enacts Finance Act 2010 Effecting 50% Tax on Bankers Bonuses

CFTC Federal Register Notice

Swap Execution Facility Requirements

U.S. Tax Reform. Individual Taxation SUMMARY. January 8, 2018

IRS Issues Proposed Regulations on Qualified Opportunity Funds

New York s Highest Court Endorses Application of Separate Entity Rule to International Banks

Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein Announces Revisions to Yates Memo

SEC Adopts New Rules Affecting Public Company Reporting

Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Executive Order Imposes New Terms for Federal Contractors

Commercial Mortgage Modifications

LabCFTC Releases Primer on Virtual Currencies

Joint Committee on Taxation Releases Summary of Senate Finance Committee s Tax Reform Plan

Transcription:

Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction of Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited Spin-Off by U.S.-Listed Companies via a Listing by Introduction on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange 1 SUMMARY China Natural Resources, Inc. ( CHNR ), a natural resources company based in the People s Republic of China (the PRC ) with shares listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market, recently completed the spin-off (the Spin-Off ) and listing by introduction (the Listing by Introduction ) on The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the Hong Kong Stock Exchange ) of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited ( Feishang Anthracite ), which operated CHNR s coal mining and related businesses prior to the Spin-Off. S&C represented CHNR and Feishang Anthracite in connection with the Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction, which is the first-of-its-kind where a U.S.-listed company successfully spun off and listed shares of its businesses on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, including advising on the U.S. and Hong Kong legal issues that arose in connection with this transaction. TRANSACTION OVERVIEW In connection with the Spin-Off, the ordinary shares of Feishang Anthracite were distributed on a pro rata basis to holders of record of the common shares of CHNR (the Distribution ). In particular, holders of CHNR common shares ( CHNR Shareholders ) received five Feishang Anthracite ordinary shares for each CHNR common share held on the record date. CHNR Shareholders did not pay any consideration for the Feishang Anthracite ordinary shares that they received in the Distribution. No CHNR Shareholder approval was required for the Spin-Off or Distribution. New York Washington, D.C. Los Angeles Palo Alto London Paris Frankfurt Tokyo Hong Kong Beijing Melbourne Sydney www.sullcrom.com

Corporate structure pre-spin-off/listing by Introduction Controlling Public 59.33% 40.67% CHNR (NASDAQ listed) 100% Metal mining operations 100% Feishang Anthracite Corporate structure post-spin-off/listing by Introduction Controlling Public Controlling Public 59.33% 40.67% 59.33% 40.67% 100% CHNR (NASDAQ listed) Feishang Anthracite (HKSE listed) Metal mining operations CONSIDERATIONS UNDER THE U.S. FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS The Spin-Off raised a number of key considerations under the U.S. federal securities laws, including the following: Registration under the Securities Act of 1933 A key threshold question revolved around whether a spin-off transaction would be subject to registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act ). In particular, the conditions and requirements set forth in Staff Legal Bulletin No. 4 ( SLB 4 ) issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) needed to be carefully analyzed and considered in the context of the Spin-Off. 2 Disclosure requirements under the Exchange Act Under SLB 4, adequate information relating to the entity being spun off must be provided to the parent company s and the trading markets. Where both the parent company and the spun-off entity are non-u.s. companies, which is the case for CHNR and Feishang Anthracite, the parent company would -2-

prepare an information statement that substantially complies with Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C. In addition, depending on the specific facts and circumstances, the spun-off entity may also be required to register its securities under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act ). 3 In the case of Feishang Anthracite, the information statement included: (i) the listing document which was also submitted to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange; and (ii) additional disclosure required under SLB 4 as well as the Exchange Act. As a result, the information statement met the relevant requirements under the Hong Kong Listing Rules, SLB 4 and the Exchange Act. Confidential treatment for foreign private issuers Foreign private issuers listed in the United States should consider requesting confidential treatment in connection with a spin-off transaction where the need to deal with, as well as harmonize, the differing regulatory requirements of multiple jurisdictions is expected to arise. In the case of Feishang Anthracite, which had to register its ordinary shares under the Exchange Act, the ability to obtain confidential review of its registration statement by the SEC staff 4 was very helpful in ensuring that any differing or potentially conflicting regulatory requirements could be addressed in an appropriate manner. Moreover, by obtaining confidential treatment, the 60-day period for automatic effectiveness of a registration statement filed under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act does not commence until the registration statement has been publicly filed. This has the added benefit of helping harmonize any transaction timing differences that may arise when multiple regulatory regimes are implicated. HONG KONG LISTING CONSIDERATIONS In connection with the Listing by Introduction, the key considerations under the listing rules of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (the HK Listing Rules ) included the following: Waiver from Rule 8.05 of the HK Listing Rules Under Rule 8.05 of the HK Listing Rules, the spun-off entity must satisfy certain financial tests, including the profit test, the market capitalization/revenue/cash flow test and the market capitalization/revenue test. In its listing application, Feishang Anthracite applied for a waiver from strict compliance with Rule 8.05 that is available to qualified mineral companies. Such waiver is granted by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange at its sole discretion. As a result, the granting of the waiver will depend to a significant extent on the persuasiveness of the waiver application. Among other factors, the spun-off entity should demonstrate that its management has sufficient management experience and expertise and that there is a clear path to commercial production as well as profitability where the mining businesses are still at pilot run or construction stages. Competing businesses of controlling Rule 8.10 of the HK Listing Rules requires detailed disclosure regarding any business of the controlling shareholder that competes with those of the spun-off entity. The disclosure should address, among other things, the reasons for not including such competing business in the spun-off entity, a description of the -3-

competing business and its management and facts demonstrating that the spun-off entity is able to carry on its business independently of the competing business. In addition, under certain circumstances, contractual arrangements as well as related undertakings would need to be devised and structured among the controlling shareholder and the spun-off entity in order to address the Hong Kong Stock Exchange s concern over arrangements to manage conflicts of interest and delineation of businesses between the spunoff entity and other businesses under the common control of the controlling shareholder. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS The Spin-Off and Listing by Introduction also raised other important disclosure and other issues, including: disclosure of the mining consultant s report that is required to be included in the listing document under the HK Listing Rules (also referred to as the competent person s report under the HK Listing Rules) and issues relating to compliance with SEC Industry Guide 7; dealing with issues arising as a result of the financial statements included in the spun-off entity s registration statement in connection with the Spin-Off being prepared under the applicable U.S. auditing and accounting standards, while the financial statements used for purposes of the Listing by Introduction were prepared under the applicable Hong Kong financial reporting standards; appropriate treatment of certain pro forma financial information prepared in accordance with the requirements of the HK Listing Rules and harmonization with the requirements of Article 11 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act; disclosure of certain non-gaap financial measures included in the listing document submitted to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and the appropriate reconciliations in accordance with Regulation G under the Exchange Act; and structuring the mechanics and procedures for the Distribution, including addressing the differing requirements of NASDAQ, The Depository Trust Company and the share registrars of the applicable non-u.s. jurisdictions, the Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands. * * * Copyright Sullivan & Cromwell LLP 2014-4-

ENDNOTES 1 2 3 4 Sullivan & Cromwell represented China Natural Resources, Inc., the parent company, and Feishang Anthracite Resources Limited, the spun-off entity, and was the architect behind the spin-off/listing by introduction structure. The relevant conditions as stipulated under SLB 4 are: (i) no consideration provided to the parent company for the subsidiary shares; (ii) spin-off must be pro rata to the parent ; (iii) the spun-off entity shares must be registered under the Exchange Act, and adequate information about the spin-off and the spun-off entity must be made public; (iv) there must be a valid business purpose for the spin-off; and (v) restricted securities that are spun off must have been held by the parent company for at least two years. SLB 4 also provides that there may be situations where the spun-off securities would not have to be registered under the Exchange Act (for example, the Rule 12g3-2(a) or 12g3-2(b) exemption from registration may be available). The SEC will consider requests for no-action positions from non-u.s. companies that do not intend to register the spun-off securities under the Exchange Act. Under the current policy of the SEC staff, confidential review of initial registration statements of foreign private issuers is available only under limited circumstances, including situations where a foreign private issuer is listed or is concurrently listing its securities on a non-u.s. securities exchange, or a foreign private issuer is able to demonstrate that the public filing of an initial registration statement would conflict with the laws of an applicable foreign jurisdiction. -5-

ABOUT SULLIVAN & CROMWELL Sullivan & Cromwell is a global law firm that advises on major domestic and cross-border M&A, finance, corporate and real estate transactions, significant litigation and corporate investigations, and complex restructuring, regulatory, tax and estate planning matters. Founded in 1879, Sullivan & Cromwell has more than 800 lawyers on four continents, with four offices in the United States, including its headquarters in New York, three offices in Europe, two in Australia and three in Asia. CONTACTING SULLIVAN & CROMWELL This publication is provided by Sullivan & Cromwell as a service to clients and colleagues. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Questions regarding the matters discussed in this publication may be directed to any of our lawyers listed below, or to any other Sullivan & Cromwell lawyer with whom you have consulted in the past on similar matters. If you have not received this publication directly from us, you may obtain a copy of any past or future related publications from Karen Cheung (+852-2826-8650; cheungk@sullcrom.com) in our Hong Kong office. CONTACTS Hong Kong William Y. Chua +852-2826-8632 chuaw@sullcrom.com Kay Ian Ng +852-2826-8601 king@sullcrom.com Beijing Gwen Wong +86-10-5923-5967 wonggw@sullcrom.com -6- HONGKONG:126727.8