July The Economic Impact of The Children s Home of Cincinnati on the Greater Cincinnati Area,

Similar documents
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TALBERT HOUSE on greater cincinnati

A Tutorial for Understanding Your Hospital s Economic and Community Impact Report. Healthcare Association of New York State April 2003

Economic Impact of The Bradley Center. Prepared by: Bret J. Mayborne Economic Research Director Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce

Economic Impacts of the First 5 Placer Children & Families Commission s Funded Programs

Margaretville Memorial Hospital. Community

00DRAD002AdirondackMedicalCenter. Oneida Healthcare. on the. January Direct and Indirect Impact on Our Community beyond direct patient care.

Longview Economic Development Corporation Program Performance Overview

Economic Impact Of Ohio Aerospace Institute, FY

Quantifying the Economic Impact of the Florida Museum of Natural History on Alachua County and Florida

Tulip Time 2015: Economic Impact and Attendee Profile

LAFAYETTE, LOUISIANA SMALL FILMS ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY LAFAYETTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of St. Elizabeth Healthcare System (Hospitals and Physician Offices)

Economic Impact Analysis

The Impacts of Construction and Operation of Three Generation Alternatives on the Economy of the Commonwealth of Virginia

A Vital Force in Ohio s Economy

A Vital Force in Florida s Economy

Key Findings. THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF PeaceHealth IN L ANE COUNT Y

The American Beverage Licensees Economic Impact Study. Methodology and Documentation Prepared for: American Beverage Licensees

The American Beverage Licensees Economic Impact Study. Methodology and Documentation Prepared for: American Beverage Licensees

The Economic Impact of Flagstaff Unified

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE ARKANSAS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY VENTURE CAPITAL INVESTMENT TRUST

Economic Consequences of Layoffs at the Red River Army Depot in 2018

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE ROUND ROCK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Green County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Morgan County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lawrence County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Daviess County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Jefferson County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Lyon County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Boone County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hancock County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Woodford County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Caldwell County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Hardin County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Summer Youth Employment Program Impact Analysis. Kansas

Table 1 Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on Estill County. Multiplier Type Direct Impact Multiplier Total Impact

Economic and Fiscal Impact of the Arizona Public University Enterprise

Economic Impact of the Commercial Construction Industry on the Economy of the State of Alabama

Economic Impact of the Oklahoma Manufacturing Sector Winter 2018 Prepared by Prepared for

New Orleans Ernest N. Morial Convention Center

The Economic Impact Of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2015

COLORADO FILM INCENTIVES

Measuring the economic pulse of Health Care and Related Industries on the Wichita Regional Economy

Steven C. Agee Economic Research and Policy Institute

Economic Impact of JumpStart Inc. Portfolio and Client Companies, 2010

Summer Youth Employment Program Impact Analysis. Kansas WorkforceONE Local Area I

Gigafactory #1 Employment Ramp

TRS Benefit Payments by Illinois Legislative District & Their Impact on the Illinois Economy

Avoid creating the perception that any OFS funding has been spent inappropriately. Ensure that revenues earn the maximum interest possible

Impacts of the Commercial Gaming Industry in Iowa. November 2014

Impacts of the Commercial Gaming Industry in Indiana. November 2014

FANNIE BATTLE DAY HOME FOR CHILDREN, INC. AND AFFILIATE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT. June 30, 2013 and 2012

The Economic Impact of Population Growth in Great Falls, Montana

AFL-CIO Housing Investment Trust s Construction Jobs Initiative THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS. of the

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE ROUND ROCK CHAMBER

The Economic Benefits of the Cherry Creek School District

The 2015 Economic Impact Study of the Recreation Vehicle Industry

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACT OF A WAL-MART DISTRIBUTION CENTER IN OPELOUSAS, LOUISIANA AUGUST 2008

Summer Youth Employment Program Impact Analysis. Heartland Works Local Area II

Financial Guidelines for Child Care Centers Receiving State Subsidies:

The Economic Contribution of Maine s Hospitals

2016 Upstate Venture CEO Survey Economic Footprint

NLPES Excellence in Evaluation Award Submission New Mexico Legislative Finance Committee Program Evaluation Unit Narrative

Economic Impact. Naval Air Station. Patuxent River. Naval Surface Warfare Center. Indian Head. Analysis of the. of the. and the.

The Economic Impact of Short-Term Rentals In the State of Texas 2018 Update

The Economic Impact of Allergan

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LOCAL PARKS FULL REPORT

Comprehensive Community Child Care Organization, Inc. (4C for Children)

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS KING INSTITUTE FOR REGIONAL ECONOMIC STUDIES (KIRES) KIRES Report No. 14, September 2015

The Economic Value of San Diego & Imperial Counties Community Colleges Association

Jul - Dec 14 Budget $ Over Budget % of Budget Ordinary Income/Expense Income Special Parcel Tax 453, , ,

Aurora Public Schools Foundation

TAMPA SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION d/b/a TRINITY SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN. Financial Statements and Supplementary Information Year Ended June 30, 2017

Vermont Legislative Joint Fiscal Office

Economic and fiscal impacts of the Michigan film tax credit

Economic Impact on Riverside County of the Proposed Palen PV Solar Project

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AMAZON S MAJOR CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

The Local Economic Impact of Short Term Rentals in Galveston, Texas

EBRI Databook on Employee Benefits Appendix D: Explanation of Sources

Minnesota Printing Industry Economic & Fiscal Contribution

Economic Impact of Tennessee HOUSE Grants

The Economic Impact of the Cherokee Nation: Fiscal Year 2016 Impact Report. April 3, 2017

POTENTIAL ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF A PENNSYLVANIA HOUSING TRUST FUND

The Economic Impact of Nevada s Community Health Centers

Economic Impacts of the UNM Health Sciences Center on the New Mexico Economy

The Economic Impact of Travel on Massachusetts Counties 2009

The Importance of the Health Care Sector to the Kansas Economy

ECONOMIC AND REVENUE IMPACTS

2015 Economic Impact of Companies Funded and/or Assisted by the Northeast Ohio Entrepreneurial Signature Program

The Induced Economic Impact of Melwood Wages on State and Regional Economies

The Economic Impact of the 2014 Alberta Winter Games

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH ALABAMA ON COLBERT AND LAUDERDALE COUNTIES

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FEARRINGTON PLACE

Economic Impact of State Farm Insurance s Michigan Operations Center on the Marshall Area and Calhoun County

The Economic Impact of the Local Healthcare System on the Woodford County Economy

FANNIE BATTLE DAY HOME FOR CHILDREN, INC. AND AFFILIATE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INDEPENDENT AUDITOR S REPORT. June 30, 2012 and 2011

THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF A NESTLÉ WATERS NORTH AMERICA PROPOSED BOTTLING FACILITY IN CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

The Economic Impact of the 2012 Alberta Cross Country Ski World Cup

KENTUCKY STATE FAIR BOARD 2014 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY KENTUCKY EXPOSITION CENTER KENTUCKY INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTER

South Carolina First Steps to School Readiness. Financial Statements. For the Year Ended June 30, 2017

Transcription:

July 2016 The Economic Impact of The Children s Home of Cincinnati on the Greater Cincinnati Area, 2011-2015

INTRODUCTION The Children s Home of Cincinnati (The Children s Home) has been an invaluable asset to the Cincinnati Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) for over 150 years by offering services ranging from a traditional orphanage to adoption services to presently providing education and therapeutic treatment to children facing social, behavioral, and learning challenges. These impacts reach across all social and socioeconomic lines and truly make Cincinnati a more prosperous and equitable place to live. Each year The Children s Home helps nearly 7,000 children overcome social and educational barriers. The impacts of these efforts reach far beyond the children and their families the community benefits greatly from the direct efforts of The Children s Home as well as through having more people in the area that are confident and able to be part of the regional economy. The Economics Center determined the economic impacts that The Children s Home had on regional jobs, earnings, and output between 2011 and 2015. The Center relied on data provided by The Children s Home to determine the direct impacts for the past five years. Then the Economics Center calculated the indirect impacts using the direct impacts and RIMS-II multipliers provided by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. THE CHILDREN S HOME OF CINCINNATI FISCAL YEARS 2011-2015 EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION & BENEFITS $180 MILLION OTHER AGENCY EXPENDITURES $24 MILLION $204 MILLION During fiscal years 2011-2015, the direct and indirect economic impacts created by The Children s Home on the Cincinnati MSA resulted from its operational expenditures, capital improvements, and revenues. The Children s Home of Cincinnati Economic Impact Report, July 2016 1

THE CHILDREN S HOME ECONOMIC IMPACT The Children s Home of Cincinnati has significant economic impacts on the Cincinnati MSA through its efforts in behavioral health treatment and therapeutic education services. Additionally, The Children s Home provides broad benefits to the Cincinnati MSA through its operations, capital improvements, and overall expenditures. Additionally, The Children s Home provides fiscal benefits to the City of Cincinnati through earnings taxes. This study analyzes the direct and indirect economic impacts created by The Children s Home on the Cincinnati MSA resulting from its operational expenditures, capital improvements, and revenues during the fiscal years (FYs) 2011-2015 timeframe. The direct impacts resulted from the expenditures or revenues associated with the operations of The Children s Home, whereas the indirect impacts resulted from interindustry purchases made as a result of the operations of The Children s Home as well as the purchases resulting from take-home pay by employees associated directly or indirectly with The Children s Home. Further economic impacts stem from new money, which is revenue received in the form of gifts, endowments, and grants from various organizations located outside of the Cincinnati MSA. These new money benefits exist only due to the existence of The Children s Home. While one could assume that local money spent within the Cincinnati MSA is inevitable, exogenous or outside funding was raised and spent entirely due to The Children s Home efforts and existence. Analyzing this new money is a way to communicate that, but for The Children s Home, these economic impacts would not have existed in the local economy. TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT $204M (2011-2015) DIRECT $92 MILLION THE CHILDREN S HOME PAYROLL $81.2M PURCHASES OF GOODS & SERVICES $10.8M 1,557 JOBS The Children s Home impact is 1.2 times greater than its direct expenditures. 2,909 TOTAL JOBS INDIRECT $112 MILLION ADDITIONAL PAYROLL SUPPORTED IN THE COMMUNITY & PURCHASES BY THOSE EMPLOYEES $98.9M VENDOR SPENDING IN THE COMMUNITY $13.1M 1,352 JOBS The Children s Home of Cincinnati Economic Impact Report, July 2016 2

Economic Impacts of Expenditures and Operations The Economics Center divided the impacts associated with expenditures and operations into two categories: compensation and benefits; and other expenditures. Compensation and benefits includes all of the salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes, and all professional fees and contract service payments. Other expenditures include such things as supplies, travel, printing and publications, and membership dues. These expenditures (both compensation and benefits as well as other expenditures) were split in order to better assess and estimate the economic impact of The Children s Home. From 2011 through 2015, The Children s Home had a significant impact on the Cincinnati MSA in terms of jobs, economic output, and earnings as demonstrated in Table 1 (see Appendix A). Between 2011 and 2015, The Children s Home had an economic impact of over $200 million dollars (in 2015 dollars). This average impact of $40 million per year primarily stems from the compensation and benefits of employees and contract workers (approximately $35 million per year) and the remainder is comprised of the other expenditures (approximately $5 million per year). In addition to the impact of the economic output on the Cincinnati MSA, The Children s Home also drives a significant amount of local employment. Between 2011 and 2015, an average of 582 individuals were employed each year due to the direct and indirect employment and expenditures of The Children s Home (see Table 2, Appendix A). Of these 582 jobs, an average of 311 were directly employed by The Children s Home. These jobs consist of any employment created directly through the operations of The Children s Home such as teachers, administrative, or facilities operations. The remaining 271 jobs on average consist of indirect jobs. The indirect jobs came from the numerous business-to-business transactions involved with The Children s Home (buying supplies, printing, and other expenditures), as well as due to the take-home wages of The Children s Home employees and how they spend their money in the local economy. For example, an employee of The Children s Home still purchases goods and services from others in the local economy due to their wages earned at The Children s Home. This means that for every individual employed by The Children s Home between 2011 and 2015, almost one other individual within the Cincinnati MSA had a job due to The Children s Home s expenditures and their employees daily spending. ANNUAL AVERAGE OF 311 271 CHILDREN S HOME JOBS SUPPORTS ANNUAL AVERAGE OF JOBS IN THE COMMUNITY THE CHILDREN S HOME ANNUALLY SUPPORTS DIRECT & INDIRECT JOBS IN THE 582 GREATER CINCINNATI REGION In addition to the number of jobs that the Children s Home provides directly and indirectly, its employees also contribute to the fiscal well-being of the City of Cincinnati. Table 3 outlines the income tax revenues generated from direct wages at Children s Home. Between 2011 and 2015, the employees of Children s Home contributed more than $1.1 million in tax revenue to the City of Cincinnati. This comes out to an average of $227,000 per year. These fiscal benefits support roads, city services, and many other amenities in the City of Cincinnati. The Children s Home of Cincinnati Economic Impact Report, July 2016 3

Economic Impact of New Money A significant portion of the revenues generated between 2011 and 2015 by the Children s Home came from outside sources. This money would not exist in the local economy without the existence of the Children s Home. Local funds that support the Children s Home have been netted out of the following calculations as it can be assumed that any local dollars that help fund the Children s Home could support another local service provider. Therefore, the separating out of this new money exemplifies the importance and unique impact of the Children s Home on the local economy. These figures are part of the above mentioned total economic impacts. More than half of revenue received between 2011 and 2015 by the Children s Home consists of new money. This money came in the form of grants, foundations, donations, federal and state support (netting out the local contributions), and contributions from other groups. This $57 million of exogenous money paid for more than just the salaries of employees of the Children s Home it provided for funding for programming, education, and services for children across the Greater Cincinnati area. Between 2011 and 2015, The Children s Home directly spent over $57 million of exogenous funds, which resulted in an additional $68 million of indirect economic impact (all dollar figures have been adjusted to 2015 dollars). These indirect activities include inter-industrial ripple effects, for example the grants used for The Children s Home s operations within the region and purchases from other local producers. In total, The Children s Home created a local impact of $125 million due to bringing exogenous funds to the Greater Cincinnati area. Over the past five years, there has been a gradual growth in the external revenues received, with notable increases in fiscal years 2013 and 2015. A significant portion of this exogenous funding comes from Medicaid payments through the State of Ohio. Other sources of the new money consist of revenues such as investment returns and the Every Child Succeeds Program. $57M New Money $68M Indirect Impact New Money Created a Significant Local Impact $125 Million (2011-2015) CONCLUSION As a leading provider of behavioral health and therapeutic education services, The Children s Home of Cincinnati provides invaluable benefits to participants and the community at large. These services provide training and preparation for job-readiness, life-skills, early childhood education, and support and therapy to improve quality of life. Between 2011 and 2015, The Children s Home supported total employment for more than 2,000 people, over $1.1 million of tax revenue for the City of Cincinnati, and $204 million of total economic impact of which $125 million came from outside funding sources, or new money. This is in addition to changing the lives of nearly 7,000 children and families who benefit annually from services provided. The Children s Home of Cincinnati Economic Impact Report, July 2016 4

APPENDIX A: Data Tables Table 1. Economic Impacts of Expenditures and Operations, 2011-2015 (2015 Dollars) Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Compensation and Benefits Direct Impact $14,871,000 $15,845,000 $16,789,000 $17,048,000 $16,626,000 $81,179,000 Indirect Impact $18,106,000 $19,291,000 $20,440,000 $20,756,000 $20,242,000 $98,835,000 Total $32,977,000 $35,136,000 $37,229,000 $37,804,000 $36,868,000 $180,014,000 Other Agency Expenditures Direct Impact $1,929,000 $2,141,000 $2,597,000 $2,016,000 $2,105,000 $10,788,000 Indirect Impact $2,348,000 $2,607,000 $3,163,000 $2,454,000 $2,562,000 $13,134,000 Total $4,277,000 $4,748,000 $5,760,000 $4,470,000 $4,667,000 $23,922,000 Economic Impact $37,254,000 $39,884,000 $42,989,000 $42,274,000 $41,535,000 $203,936,000 Table 2. Economic Impact on Employment due to Expenditures Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Direct Jobs 300 369 337 296 255 1,557 Indirect Jobs 249 291 302 258 252 1,352 Total 549 660 639 554 507 2,909 Table 3. Earnings Tax Collected from Children's Home of Greater Cincinnati Employees Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Local Earnings Tax Collected by the City of Cincinnati $207,000 $222,000 $227,000 $236,000 $244,000 $1,135,000 Table 4. Economic Impacts of New Money (2015 Dollars) Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Direct Impact $10,980,000 $10,907,000 $11,322,000 $11,257,000 $12,079,000 $56,545,000 Indirect Impact $13,367,000 $13,280,000 $13,784,000 $13,705,000 $14,707,000 $68,843,000 Total $24,347,000 $24,187,000 $25,106,000 $24,962,000 $26,786,000 $125,388,000 The Children s Home of Cincinnati Economic Impact Report, July 2016 6

APPENDIX B: Methodology Economic impact figures represent the effects that a given development project and its associated economic activities have upon a surrounding community. The dollars spent by an organization and its employees circulate within a local economy by being spent on goods and services provided by local businesses, which are in turn spent at other establishments and by local households. The Economics Center calculated the impact of The Children s Home of Cincinnati s expenditures and operations from fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2015 using budgetary data provided by the client. These data were used in an input-output model, which measures goods and services produced in each industry and the use of those goods and services by other industries and households. Input-output models give a picture of the direct and indirect impacts of a given business or organization. The direct impacts of the project are measured in terms of the total costs of operating The Children s Home, and in terms of the wages paid to its employees. In turn, operating The Children s Home supports jobs and spending in other industries, which comprise the indirect impacts. Finally, the direct and indirect impacts of inter-industry spending create induced impacts due to the spending of private households. Multipliers are figures that represent all the inter-industry and household economic relationships measured in the input-output model. For every dollar spent by a given organization in a particular industry, multipliers reflect how many more dollars will be spent in a local economy by other businesses and households, thereby determining the total economic impact of a project or investment. The multipliers reflect two sets of economic impacts: first, the direct number of jobs and wages; and second, the final effects, which add the indirect and induced impacts to the direct ones. This model, its constituent tables, and resulting multipliers are part of the BEA s RIMS II project (Regional Industrial Multiplier System), which covers both the state and County levels throughout the United States. Each industry in a given locale has its own multiplier, reflecting its relationship to the rest of the local economy. Applying the relevant multipliers for each industry allowed the Economics Center to give a realistic picture of the economic impact of The Children s Home added to the local economy between fiscal years 2011 and 2015. For instance, Construction has an industry code of 23, and this industry has a final-demand spending multiplier of 1.55, which means that for every $1 million spent by that industry in the MSA, another $550,000 of economic activity results. Additionally, this industry has an employment multiplier of 6.9 so, for every $1 million spent in Construction, approximately 7 jobs are supported annually in the rest of the economy. The Children s Home of Cincinnati Economic Impact Report, July 2016 7