RULES OF ICC AS APPOINTING AUTHORITY IN UNCITRAL OR OTHER AD HOC ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

Similar documents
Rules of ICC as Appointing Authority in UNCITRAL or Other Ad Hoc Arbitration Proceedings. in force as from 1 January 2004

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ARBITRATION LEADING DISPUTE RESOLUTION WORLDWIDE. Rules of ICC

Rules of Arbitration in force as from 1 January 1998

RULES OF ARBITRATION OF AMCHAM PERU (In force from September 1, 2008)

ICC INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ARBITRATION RULES

PROCEDURE AND SERVICES UNDER THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATION INVOLVING INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND STATES

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

CONTENTS. KLRCA ARBITRATION RULES (As revised in 2017) UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES (As revised in 2013) SCHEDULES. Part I. Part II.

FACTSHEET ICC COMMISSION ON ARBITRATION AND ADR

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION OPTIONAL RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND PRIVATE PARTIES

SCC PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CASES UNDER THE 2010 UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

Selection and Appointment of Arbitrators

Jurisdiction. Legis in effect. Legislation date. Topics. Source

LAC PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CASES UNDER THE UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

Arbitration Rules of the Sharm El-Sheikh International Arbitration Centre

PERMANENT COURT OF ARBITRATION ARBITRATION RULES 2012

Practical Tips on Commencement of Arbitration

የ}hhK < ¾ÓMÓM Å w The Revised Arbitration Rules

UNCITRAL ARBITRATION RULES

International Commercial Arbitration

General Conditions for Purchase (CG-2)

Uniform Rules for Forfaiting (URF 800)

ARBITRATION RULES LJUBLJANA ARBITRATION RULES. Dispute Resolution Since 1928

No Israel. and Kazakhstan

Jurisdiction. Legis in effect. Legislation date. Topics. Definitions. Source. (1) In this Agreement,

CEDRAC Rules. in force as from 1 January 2012

12 September 2011: Release of the New ICC Rules of Arbitration.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

Comparison between SCC arbitration and CIETAC arbitration

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE MAURITIUS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE

ARBITRATION RULES. of the Finland Chamber of Commerce

Suggested Changes to the ICSID Rules and Regulations. Working Paper of the ICSID Secretariat. May 12, 2005

AGREEMENT BETWEEN SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO AND THE REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS ON RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

THE SECRETARIAT s GUIDE TO ICC ARBITRATION

Choosing the right arbitration institution guidance for businesses on costs

the Swiss Federal Council and the Government of the State of Qatar on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF SWEDEN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES CONCERNING THE PROMOTION AND

THE JAPAN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES. CHAPTER General Provisions

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID)

Schedule of Arbitration Fees and Costs (effective 1 June 2003)

M&A DISPUTES AND ARBITRATION: THE ICC PERSPECTIVE

The Government of the State of Israel and the Government of the Republic of Georgiao (referred to hereinafter as the "Contracting Parties"),

Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce

INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - PALESTINE

RULES OF ARBITRATION 2016

NOTE TO PARTIES AND ARBITRAL TRIBUNALS ON THE CONDUCT OF THE ARBITRATION UNDER THE ICC RULES OF ARBITRATION

Agreement between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of Poland on encouragement and reciprocal protection of Investments

CIArb ARBITRATION RULES: ARBITRATOR APPOINTMENT FORM. Sole Arbitrator Second Arbitrator Presiding Arbitrator Substitute Arbitrator Other:

ARBITRATION RULES OF THE PDRCI (Effective as of 1 January 2015)

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SULTANATE OF OMAN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AUSTRIA

Shanghai International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (Shanghai International Arbitration Center) Arbitration Rules

PROTECTION AGREEMENT (IPPA)

RULES OF ARBITRATION 1 st March 2014

LOW VOLTAGE AGREEMENT GROUP (LOVAG) AGREEMENT

(Beijing, 9.XI.2006) Article 1. Definitions

ASEAN Law Association

ICC COMMISSION REPORT CONTROLLING TIME AND COSTS

Institutional vs. ad hoc arbitration: when and why?

Canberra, 12 November Entry into force, 14 March 2007 AUSTRALIAN TREATY SERIES [2007] ATS 22

2018 DIS ARBITRATION RULES. First Edition

Beijing Arbitration Commission Arbitration Rules

Volume 2239,

Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden and the Government of Romania on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection of Investments

between thé Polish People s Republic and thé Swiss Confédération on thé Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments

Law of the People's Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign Contractual Joint Ventures

ICC Model Subcontract

THE RULES OF ARBITRATION OF THE PERMANENT ARBITRATION COURT AT THE CROATIAN CHAMBER OF ECONOMY

Volume 2238, AGREEMENT ON ENCOURAGEMENT AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE KINGDOM OF NETHERLANDS AND THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA

A G R E E M E N T BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE STATE OF KUWAIT FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

AGREEMENT. Desiring to intensify economic cooperation to the mutual benefit of both countries,

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION COURT REGULATION "ON THE PROCEDURE OF ORGANIZATION AND CONDUCT OF "AD HOC" ARBITRAL PROCEEDINGS"

No Cyprus and Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL IN AD HOC ARBITRATIONS

AGREEMENT ON THE MUTUAL PROTECTION AND PROMOTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE LEBANESE REPUBLIC AND THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA ON THE PROMOTION AND RECIPROCAL PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

11th. Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Ukraine

AGREEMENT BETWEEN AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC

4. Drafting arbitration clauses

No Paraguay and Bolivia. Paraguay

1.5 Priority of Documents

Treaty. between. the Federal Republic of Germany. and... concerning. the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection. of Investments

Lao People's Democratic Republic and Cuba. R6publique d6mocratique populaire lao. No et Cuba

RULES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION

Intending to create favourable conditions for investments by investors of one Contracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party;

Part VII. Part V of the Polish Code of Civil Procedure Arbitration. [The following translation is not an official document]

COMMENTARY ICC Rules of Arbitration Come Into Force. Changes to Achieve Greater Speed and Cost-Efficiency JONES DAY

ANNEX III INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

No SPAIN and CUBA. Agreement on the promotion and reciprocal protection of investments. Signed at Havana on 27 May 1994.

THE ASSOCIATION OF ARBITRATORS (SOUTHERN AFRICA)

Agreement. Between. the Republic of Guatemala. and. the Kingdom of the Netherlands. on the Promotion and Reciprocal Protection.

ARBITRATOR S GUIDELINES

Georgian International Arbitration Centre

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2869/95 of 13 December 1995 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF LEBANON AND THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN ON THE RECIPROCAL ENCOURAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS. 1. Introduction

Bilateral Agreements for the Promotion and Protection of Investments between Cambodia and Malaysia

AGREEMENT between the Republic of Austria and the Republic of Macedonia on the Promotion and Protection of Investments

Legal Sources. 17 th Willem. C Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot / 7 th Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot (East)

Transcription:

RULES OF ICC AS APPOINTING AUTHORITY IN UNCITRAL OR OTHER AD HOC ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS In force as from January 004 Article : ICC as Appointing Authority in UNCITRAL or Other Ad Hoc Arbitration Proceedings... Article : Request for ICC to Act as Appointing Authority... Article : The Court Acting as Appointing Authority under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules... Article 4: The Court Acting as Appointing Authority in Ad Hoc, Non-UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceedings... Article 5: General Provisions... 4 Article 6 : ICC Costs for Services Rendered as Appointing Authority... 4 APPENDIX: ICC COSTS FOR SERVICES RENDERED AS APPOINTING AUTHORITY 5 Article... 5 Article... 5 Article : ICC as Appointing Authority in UNCITRAL or Other Ad Hoc Arbitration Proceedings If so empowered by an arbitration clause, a subsequent agreement of the parties, a designation by the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, or otherwise, the International Chamber of Commerce ( ICC ) shall act as appointing authority in accordance with the parties agreement and/or the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. The present Rules shall also apply where an authority within ICC is requested to act as appointing authority in accordance with the parties agreement or is designated by the Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague. References to ICC in these Rules include such other authorities. Where ICC is empowered or requested to act as appointing authority under Articles () or (), the function shall be carried out by the ICC International Court of Arbitration (the Court ). To fulfil this role, the Court shall create a special committee (the Special Committee ) consisting of the President [] of the Court and two other members of the Court. The President may designate a Vice-President of the Such as the Chairman or Secretary General of ICC or the President or Secretary General of the ICC International Court of Arbitration. [ ] Editor s note: Originally Chairman. Replaced by President in keeping with the change of terminology in the ICC Rules of Arbitration in force as from January 0. International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) 00 All rights reserved. ICC holds all copyright and other intellectual property rights in this collective work. No part of this work may be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, translated or adapted in any form or by any means except as permitted by law without the written permission of ICC. Permission can be requested from ICC through copyright.drs@iccwbo.org.

Court to replace him at a meeting of the Special Committee. Unless otherwise provided, the Special Committee shall carry out the functions of the Court under these Rules. The Special Committee s decisions shall be taken unanimously. In the event that a unanimous decision cannot be reached, the matter shall be referred to the Court sitting as a special plenary session (the Special Plenary Session ). When making decisions upon challenges pursuant to these Rules, the Court shall do so at a Special Plenary Session. Article : Request for ICC to Act as Appointing Authority In cases referred to in Article of these Rules, a party wishing ICC to act as appointing authority shall submit a request (the Request ) to the Secretariat of the Court (the Secretariat ), which shall notify the other party or parties of the receipt of the Request and the date of such receipt. The Request shall contain all the information that the requesting party deems appropriate to allow the Court to make the requested appointment. The Request and all documents annexed thereto shall be supplied in a sufficient number of copies to provide one for each party and one for the Secretariat. When submitting its Request, the requesting party shall make the payment required by Article 6 of these Rules. Should the requesting party fail to comply with either of these requirements, the Secretariat may set a time limit for compliance. Failing compliance within the time limit, the file shall be closed without prejudice to the right of the requesting party to resubmit its Request at a later date. Article : The Court Acting as Appointing Authority under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules When acting as the appointing authority for the purpose of appointing a sole or presiding (third) arbitrator pursuant to Articles 6() and 7() of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Court shall follow the list-procedure set forth in Article 6() of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, unless all parties agree that the list-procedure should not be used or the Court determines in its discretion that the use of the list-procedure is not appropriate for the case. When following the list-procedure, the Court shall prepare a list of at least three candidates which shall be communicated to the parties by the Secretariat. Within 5 days of receiving this list, each party may return the list to the Secretariat after deleting the name or names to which it objects and numbering the remaining names on the list in the order of its preference. After expiration of the aforementioned 5-day time limit, the Court shall appoint the sole or presiding arbitrator from among the names approved on the list returned to the Secretariat and in accordance with the order of preference indicated by the parties. If for any reason the appointment cannot be made according to this procedure, the Court may exercise its discretion in appointing the sole or presiding arbitrator. In accordance with Article 6(4) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, when making the appointment, the Court shall have regard to such considerations as are likely to secure the appointment of an independent and impartial arbitrator and shall take into account as well the advisability of appointing an arbitrator of a nationality other than that of the parties. ICC 00

4 When appointing an arbitrator on behalf of a party in default under Article 7 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Court may exercise its discretion in making the appointment. 5 When making decisions upon challenges submitted by any party under Article of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Court will do so at a Special Plenary Session after the Secretariat has afforded an opportunity for the arbitrator concerned, the other party or parties and any other members of the arbitral tribunal to comment in writing within a suitable period of time. Such comments shall be communicated to the parties and to the arbitrators, before being submitted to the Court. 6 When appointing a substitute arbitrator under Articles () and of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Court shall follow the procedure set forth in the preceding paragraphs. 7 At the request of any party and pursuant to Article 9(4) of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Court may, on a consultative basis, provide a statement concerning the fees of the arbitrators, taking into account the ICC Scale of Arbitrator s Fees for cases conducted under the ICC Rules of Arbitration. 8 At the request of any party and pursuant to Article 4() of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the Court may, on a consultative basis, give the arbitral tribunal any comments it deems appropriate concerning the amount of any deposit or supplementary deposit to be made under Article 4 of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. Article 4: The Court Acting as Appointing Authority in Ad Hoc, Non-UNCITRAL Arbitration Proceedings Where the parties have agreed or where an applicable text provides that ICC shall act as appointing authority in ad hoc, non-uncitral (hereafter, non-uncitral) arbitral proceedings, the Court, exercising its discretion within the limits fixed by the parties in their agreement(s), or the limits contained in the applicable text, shall appoint an arbitrator independent of the parties involved in the arbitration. The parties to non-uncitral arbitral proceedings may agree that the Court, as appointing authority, shall have the power to decide upon a challenge made by any of the parties against any member of the arbitral tribunal. A challenge shall be made by submitting to the Secretariat a written statement specifying the facts and circumstances on which the challenge is based. The Court shall decide on the challenge at a Special Plenary Session after the Secretariat has afforded an opportunity for the arbitrator concerned, the other party or parties and any other members of the arbitral tribunal to comment in writing within a suitable period of time. Such comments shall be communicated to the parties and to the arbitrators, before being submitted to the Court. ICC 00

Article 5: General Provisions When requested to act under these Rules, the Court shall proceed if it is satisfied that an agreement authorizing it to act as appointing authority may exist. If so empowered by an arbitration clause, a subsequent agreement of the parties, or otherwise, the Court shall consider providing services, besides those specifically indicated in these Rules, in accordance with the parties agreement. Before appointment in cases provided for under Articles and 4 of these Rules, a prospective arbitrator shall sign a declaration of acceptance and a statement of independence and disclose in writing to the Secretariat any facts or circumstances which might be of such a nature as to call into question the arbitrator s independence in the eyes of the parties. 4 The reasons for the decisions taken by the Court under these Rules shall not be communicated. 5 Neither the Court and its members, nor the International Chamber of Commerce and its employees shall be liable to any person for any act or omission in connection with the activities performed under these Rules. Article 6: ICC Costs for Services Rendered as Appointing Authority Each Request submitted to the Secretariat must be accompanied by payment to ICC of a nonrefundable sum, the amount of which shall be determined according to the Appendix to these Rules. For services provided pursuant to Article 5() of these Rules, the Court may fix administrative expenses commensurate with these services, which shall be paid by the requesting party or parties. ICC 00 4

APPENDIX ICC COSTS FOR SERVICES RENDERED AS APPOINTING AUTHORITY Article The non-refundable amount referred to in Article 6() of these Rules is US$,000. The nonrefundable amount is payable by the party or parties submitting the Request. No Request shall be processed unless accompanied by the requisite payment. Article The administrative expenses of ICC for the services rendered pursuant to Article 5() of these Rules shall be fixed at ICC s discretion depending on the tasks carried out by ICC. Such administrative expenses shall be commensurate with said services and shall not exceed the maximum sum of US$ 0,000. International Chamber of Commerce International Court of Arbitration -4 avenue du Président Wilson 756 Paris France Tel. + 49 5 9 05 Fax + 49 5 9 E-mail arb@iccwbo.org www.iccarbitration.org ICC 00 5