Municipal Levies- A Developers Perspective

Similar documents
OFF-SITE LEVIES UDI ALBERTA & CHBA ALBERTA RECOMMENDATIONS

Industrial Infrastructure Cost Sharing Program

BYLAW NO LEDUC COUNTY

BY-LAW 1052/05 WATER AND SANITARY SEWER OFF-SITE LEVY BY-LAW STURGEON VALLEY AREA STURGEON COUNTY, ALBERTA

THE CITY OF SPRUCE GROVE BYLAW C OFF-SITE LEVY BYLAW

*NEW REGULATION (THIS REGULATION REPLACES THE PRINCPLES AND CRITERIA FOR OFF-SITE LEVIES REGULATION) FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY

AREA STRUCTURE PLAN PROCESS

Town of Rocky Mountain House: Offsite Levy Review

City of Cold Lake: Offsite Levy Review

2019 THREE YEAR OPERATING PLAN APPROVED BY COUNCIL DECEMBER 10, 2018

Region of Peel. Review of Growth Infrastructure Financing Strategy. Growth Management Committee

City of Spruce Grove: Offsite Levy Review

Strategic Growth in the Rangeview Area Structure Plan

GUIDELINES FOR ESTABLISHING SECURITY IN SERVICING AGREEMENTS

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO

CITY OF MODESTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (HETCH HETCHY) CFD REPORT

MUNICIPAL BONDED INDEBTEDNESS LIMITS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THOSE LIMITS

Brunswick Crossing Special Taxing District City of Brunswick, Maryland

Finance and Audit Committee April 4, 2018

Consolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

FUNDING SOURCES Restricted vs. Un-Restricted Funding Sources Fund Balances and Projected Funding Availability IBank Loan

City of Vacaville FY 2017/2018 CIP Budget, General Plan Consistency and CEQA Review Parks and Recreation

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY UPDATE. General Committee May 1, 2017

Development Securities Review April 12, 2013

Township of Georgian Bay Water & Sewer Capacity Allocation Strategy. MacTier. November, Jointly prepared by the

TOWN OF MORINVILLE MORINVILLE, ALBERTA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER

1. Committed Balance - Funding approved as per FIN : Financial Reserves policy to be applied towards specific expenditures.

TITLE 18. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 14. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY PERMIT AND COMPLIANCE FEES ARTICLE 1. WATER QUALITY PROTECTION FEES

CITY OF SAULT STE. MARIE 2016 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY. Draft for Public Circulation and Comment

Guelph/Eramosa 2016 Budget Presentation. Thursday, February 18, 2016

Where are your taxes going?

LEGEND Bridges Parks Fire Stations Project Locations Libraries Schools A

CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW TAX PENALTY, INTEREST AND MONTHLY PAYMENT BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON JANUARY 1, 2018)

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Special Finance Committee FINANCE AND CORPORATE SERVICES DIVISION

CITY OF CALGARY RIVERS DISTRICT COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION LEVY REGULATION

VILLAGE OF MARSHALL TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICT NO. 1 Marshall, Wisconsin

Subject: Audited Reserves and Reserve Fund Balances for Paul Gandhi, Senior Financial Analyst, Finance and Infrastructure Services

Province of Nova Scotia Service Nova Scotia and Municipal Relations

Mayor and Council Randy Millard, Financial Planning and Reporting Manager Development Cost Charge Reserve Fund Expenditure Bylaws

City of London Development Charges Background Study. April 2009

2016 Budget Highlights

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE. Financial Statements. December 31, 2015

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE. Financial Statements. December 31, 2016

CONTEXT SETTING THE WAY WE FINANCE DEBT WHITE PAPER. THE WAY WE FINANCE - DEBT WHITE PAPER - October 2014

STATE AND LOCAL TAXES AND SPENDING

STRATHCONA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Development Charges. Someone Has to Pay, But Who?

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF KINGSTON

2017 Capital Budget Presentation. October 11, 2016

City of Prince Albert YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN

RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN EXCESS CAP A CITY CREDIT POLICY FOR WATER AND SEWERFACILTIIES

8 th Concession Road Sanitary Sewer Outlet

VILLAGE OF BOTHA VIABILITY PLAN

City of Kamloops Provisional Budget including supplemental items

City of Lancaster Sewer Fund

The following is a list of the City s Funds other than General Fund:

Audited Financial Statements and Other Financial Information of. The Corporation of the City of Kingston

Reserves & Reserve Funds Business Plan & 2016 Budget

Audited Financial Statements and Other Financial Information of. The Corporation of the City of Kingston

D E F I N I T I O N S

ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Township Manager s Proposed 2016 Municipal Budget

REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY

Consolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

Township Manager s Proposed 2017 Municipal Budget

2018 Bill 32. Fourth Session, 29th Legislature, 67 Elizabeth II THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ALBERTA BILL 32 CITY CHARTERS FISCAL FRAMEWORK ACT

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Consolidated Financial Statements of CITY OF LANGFORD. Year ended December 31, 2009

Toukley District Development Contributions Plan No 6

The Municipality of North Perth Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2016

Environment and Climate Protection Committee. Tax Supported Programs

DRAFT MULTI-YEAR Water and Wastewater & Treatment Budget December 17, ANNUAL UPDATE INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE. london.

Appendix A Financial Principles

STRATHCONA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. Year ended December 31, 2017

REPORT TO THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FROM THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT

City of Kelowna Regular Council Meeting AGENDA

VILLAGE OF MARSHALL TAX INCREMENTAL DISTRICT NO. 1 Marshall, Wisconsin

Report Purpose To provide Council with an overview of the recommended Business Plan and 2013 Budget.

Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

City of Penticton: Financial Plan Reporting Structure

TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K-1

The Corporation of the Town of Hanover Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2005

2015 Preliminary Operating and Capital Budgets. March 3, 2015

Nith Peninsula, Brant County Fiscal Impact Study

OVERVIEW OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE SOURCES. Joint House and Senate Finance, February 2, 2011 Rodney Bizzell, Fiscal Research Division

2003 Federal Budget Commentary

Condensed Unconsolidated Financial Statements of. The City of Spruce Grove

The Corporation of Haldimand County. Consolidated Financial Statements

FY 2016 FY 2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Executive Summary

2016 Annual Financial Report

CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF CORNWALL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT

Debt Management Policy Effective Date: September 19, 2017 Revised Date: Revised Date:

CITY OF EDMONTON BYLAW DEFERRAL RIDER BYLAW (CONSOLIDATED ON MARCH 20, 2001)

2009 Financial Report to Citizens

2018 CAPITAL BUDGET CAPITAL PLAN

THE CORPORATION OF THE COUNTY OF BRANT CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Transcription:

Municipal Levies- A Developers Perspective

Background Shelter is a basic necessity Serviced land is essential to shelter Cost of lot paid by homebuyer Increased costs =decreased affordability 2

Levy Definition the enlistment or conscription of men for military service the imposition or collection of an assessment 3

Synonyms Assessment, Duty, Imposition, Impost, Tax 4

Related Words direct tax, personal tax; capitation, custom(s), excise, hidden tax, income tax, poll tax, property tax, sales tax, single tax, sin tax, tariff, toll, tribute, value-added tax, withholding tax; supertax, surcharge, surtax; death tax, estate tax, inheritance tax; flat tax, proportional tax 5

When should you use a Levy? To help facilitate the development or redevelopment of land 6

why the need to facilitate development? Lack of development Developers unwilling to develop in Municipality Expensive upfront infrastructure makes development economically unfeasible...ie. Sewer trunk, water transmission line, arterial road, lift station, reservoir, bridge, major intersection Redevelopment area requires a park or school site to encourage development 7

Levy Principals Those who benefit should pay proportionately Off-site levies shall be used for Sanitary, storm-sewer, water and roads Redevelopment levies should be used for land for a park or land for school buildings, and/or land for new or expanded recreation facilities Off-site Levies should only include Capital facilities required for basic services to lands 8

Levy Process Establish a need** Conduct preliminary engineering Obtain cost estimate for infrastructure Determine benefiting area Calculate per hectare levy rate Prepare bylaw for council Three readings of bylaw Collect money at DP or DA stage Administer and update 9

Levy Project 10

11

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $5,000,000 100 ha Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 12

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $4,600,000 100 ha 8 ha $400,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 13

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $3,800,000 100 ha 16 ha $800,000 8 ha $400,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 14

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $3,200,000 100 ha 12 ha $600,000 16 ha $800,000 8 ha $400,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 15

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $2,750,000 100 ha 9 ha $450,000 8 ha $400,000 12 ha $600,000 16 ha $800,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 16

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $2,100,000 100 ha 9 ha $450,000 13 ha $650,000 8 ha $400,000 12 ha $600,000 16 ha $800,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 17

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $1,250,000 100 ha 17 ha $850,000 9 ha $450,000 13 ha $650,000 8 ha $400,000 12 ha $600,000 16 ha $800,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 18

LEVY METHOD Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $700,000 100 ha 17 ha $850,000 9 ha $450,000 13 ha $650,000 11 ha 8 ha $400,000 12 ha $600,000 16 ha $800,000 $550,000 Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 19

LEVY METHOD 17 ha $850,000 9 ha $450,000 13 ha $650,000 8 ha $400,000 14 ha $700,000 12 ha $600,000 16 ha $800,000 11 ha $550,000 Municipality Investment in Trunk Sewer $0 100 ha Levy Rate = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha +interest Paid by each development in 20

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha Trunk Cost $2,800,000 10 ha $500,000 $2,300,000 Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 21

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha 10 ha $500,000 $805,000 18 ha $900,000 $595,000 Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 22

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD 10 ha 7 ha $500,000 $350,000 $475,000 18 ha $900,000 $428,000 Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha $147,000 Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 23

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha 10 ha 7 ha $500,000 $350,000 $250,000 $65,000 9 ha $450,000 18 ha $0 $900,000 $286,000 Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 24

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 Trunk Cost $1,000,000 10 ha 7 ha $500,000 $350,000 $250,000 $65,000 9 ha 12 ha $600,000 $400,000 $450,000 18 ha $0 $900,000 $286,000 100 ha Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 25

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD 10 ha 7 ha $500,000 $350,000 $45,000 $9,000 9 ha 12 ha $600,000 $78,000 $450,000 18 ha $0 $900,000 $68,000 16 ha $800,000 $0 Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 26

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD Trunk Cost $1,200,000 15 ha $750,000 $450,000 12 ha $600,000 $78,000 10 ha 7 ha $500,000 $350,000 $45,000 $9,000 9 ha $450,000 18 ha $0 $900,000 $68,000 16 ha $800,000 $0 Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 27

DEVELOPER FUNDED METHOD 13 ha $650,000 $0 15 ha $750,000 $0 10 ha 7 ha $500,000 $350,000 $0 $0 9 ha 12 ha $600,000 $0 $450,000 18 ha $0 $900,000 $0 16 ha $800,000 $0 Estimated Trunk Sewer Cost $5,000,000 100 ha Cost per hectare = $5,000,000/100 ha = $50,000/ha Developers construct Trunk as required and have Over Expenditures (OE) repaid by future development 28

Off-site Levy Issues approval of the off-site levy for compliance with regulations by provincial watch dog before by-law becomes enforceable; improvement must be contemplated in an ASP or other capital program; construction of the improvements cannot be interminably delayed; the improvements for which off-site levies are assessed (particularly roads) requires better definition; how the benefit is to be assessed among various beneficiaries must be better regulated;

Off-site levy Issues an appeal mechanism must be provided; cost calculations interest should specifically be included as part of the capital cost; greater accountability, and better reporting on collection and use of funds is required; and imposition of off-site levies one-time only needs review. Regular updates What is leviable 30

How to solve the Problems Municipalities, Provincial Gov t and the Development Community must work together Amendments to the MGA to clarify and define the gray areas, and More efficient Design standards Innovative ways to finance infrastructure Remember the goal and purpose of the levy facilitate and encourage development or redevelopment 31

Exploring Options 2009 Gasoline Sale Edmonton 1,287,231,000 litres 1 cent per litre is $12.87 million 2009 Diesel Sales Edmonton 858,447,000 litres 1 cent per litre is $8.58 million

Thank you Ray Watkins G3 Development Services Inc. Suite 204, 17220 Stony Plain Rd. Edmonton, AB. T5S 1K6 Cell: 780-907-9663 Office: 780-701-7563 Email: ray.watkins@g3development.ca Twitter: LanddeveloperAB 33

Can they really do that? Section 648 Off-Site Levy RSA 2000 cm-26 s648;2003 c43 s3 (2) An off-site levy may be used only to pay for all or part of the capital cost of any or all of the following: (a) new or expanded facilities for the storage, transmission, treatment or supplying of water; (b) new or expanded facilities for the treatment, movement or disposal of sanitary sewage; (c) new or expanded storm sewer drainage facilities; (c.1) new or expanded roads required for or impacted by a subdivision or development; (4) An off-site levy imposed may be collected only once in respect of land that is the subject of a development or a subdivision. (5) An off-site levy (a) must be accounted for separately from other levies collected under this section, (b) must be used only for the specific purpose for which it is collected Section 649 Levy Bylaws 1995 c24 s95 A bylaw that authorizes a redevelopment levy or an off-site levy must set out the object of each levy and indicate how the amount of the levy was determined.

Regulation AR 48/2004 Principles and criteria specifically 3(1) In determining the levy costs, the municipality is to retain the flexibility to negotiate the levy in good faith and in a manner that recognizes the unique or special circumstances of the municipality. (3) There is a shared responsibility between the municipality and developers for addressing and defining existing and future infrastructure requirements and all beneficiaries of development are to be given the opportunity to participate in the cost of providing and installing infrastructure in the municipality on an equitable basis related to the degree of benefit. (5) There is to be a correlation between the levy and the impacts of new development. (10) Calculation of the levy is to be determined in consultation with affected landowners and developers.