The Effects of Student Loans on Long-Term Household Financial Stability

Similar documents
Understanding Changes in the Distribution

Discussion of Gicheva & Thompson, The Effects of Student Loans on Long- Term Household Financial Stability

Issue Brief September 2004 Debt Burden: Repaying Student Debt

ECO671, Spring 2014, Sample Questions for First Exam

Enrollment Type. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Fox Valley

Is a Student Loan Crisis on the Horizon? Understanding Changes in the Distribution of Student Loan Debt over Time

Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Marathon County. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type

Enrollment Type. UW Colleges Campus Profile: UW Manitowoc. Proportion of Non AAS Students by Enrollment Type

Loan Aversion in Education: What We Know and What Remains To Be Learned

Online Appendix for: Minimum Wages and Consumer Credit: Lisa J. Dettling and Joanne W. Hsu

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean. Population Entire MSA

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

The Impact of Credit Counseling on Consumer Outcomes: Evidence from a National Demonstration Program

SDs from Regional Peer Group Mean. SDs from Size Peer Group Mean

The current study builds on previous research to estimate the regional gap in

Reemployment after Job Loss

CSBG Scholarship/Trade Training. Please PRINT clearly

The State of Young Adult s Balance Sheets: Evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances

HOUSEHOLD DEBT AND CREDIT CONSTRAINTS: COMPARATIVE MICRO EVIDENCE FROM FOUR OECD COUNTRIES

Do Households Increase Their Savings When the Kids Leave Home?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur Millennial Financial Literacy and Fin-tech Use adipiscing elit, aliquam tincidunt dui.

Figure 2.1 The Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics Program

Wealth Inequality Reading Summary by Danqing Yin, Oct 8, 2018

How House Price Dynamics and Credit Constraints affect the Equity Extraction of Senior Homeowners

Demographic and Economic Characteristics of Children in Families Receiving Social Security

Demographic Trends and the Older Workforce

Policy Brief. protection?} Do the insured have adequate. The Impact of Health Reform on Underinsurance in Massachusetts:

Jamie Wagner Ph.D. Student University of Nebraska Lincoln

Demographics, Wealth and Opportunity

$1,000 1 ( ) $2,500 2,500 $2,000 (1 ) (1 + r) 2,000

KENTUCKY BOARD of EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES

Town Profiles: Demographic, Economic, and Housing Statistics for De Smet City and Wall Town, SOuth Dakota

Ministry of Advanced Education Student Aid Fund. Annual Report for saskatchewan.ca

The Role of Exponential-Growth Bias and Present Bias in Retirment Saving Decisions

Unlocking the Risk-based Pricing Puzzle: Five Keys to Cutting Credit Card Costs

Income Inequality and Household Labor: Online Appendicies

Changes in Economic Mobility

Labor Economics Field Exam Spring 2014

Name: 1. Use the data from the following table to answer the questions that follow: (10 points)

Saving for Retirement: Household Bargaining and Household Net Worth

The social costs of dropouts in upper secondary education in Norway

Snapshots of Financial Coaching. Bank of America & Annie E. Casey Foundation Meeting April 26, 2010

Independence, MO Data Profile 2015

Income and Assets of Medicare Beneficiaries,

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

CRIF Lending Solutions WHITE PAPER

ESTIMATING THE RISK PREMIUM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. Brandon Payne East Carolina University Department of Economics Thesis Paper November 27, 2002

The Relationship Between Income and Health Insurance, p. 2 Retirement Annuity and Employment-Based Pension Income, p. 7

Three Essays in Applied Microeconomics. Elizabeth J. Akers

Credit Crunched? The Relationship between Credit Denials and the Use of Alternative Financial Institutions

LECTURE: MEDICAID HILARY HOYNES UC DAVIS EC230 OUTLINE OF LECTURE: 1. Overview of Medicaid. 2. Medicaid expansions

Perspectives on the Youth Labour Market in Canada

By Derek V. Price Director of Higher Education Research Lumina Foundation for Education SYNOPSIS

DO YOUNG ADULTS WITH STUDENT DEBT SAVE LESS FOR RETIREMENT?

Economic Contribution of

The Effect of Macroeconomic Conditions on Applications to Supplemental Security Income

Using Randomized Evaluations to Improve Policy

Survive and Thrive From Stress to Strength

2017 Regional Indicators Summary

Predicting Student Loan Delinquency and Default. Presentation at Canadian Economics Association Annual Conference, Montreal June 1, 2013

Information Use and Attention Deferment in College Student Loan Decisions

Tyler Area Economic Overview

The looming student loan default crisis is worse than we thought

NAME DATE CLASS. Directions: Answer each of the following questions. Include in your answers the vocabulary words in parentheses.

COMMUNITY ADVANTAGE PANEL SURVEY: DATA COLLECTION UPDATE AND ANALYSIS OF PANEL ATTRITION

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics and Information Department

Trend Analysis of Changes to Population and Income in Philadelphia, using American Community Survey (ACS) Data

Investment, Human Capital and Growth

Commission District 4 Census Data Aggregation

LAKE FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

Transcription:

The Effects of Student Loans on Long-Term Household Financial Stability Dora Gicheva 1 Jeffrey Thompson 2 1 UNC Greensboro 2 Federal Reserve Board October 26, 2013 Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 1 / 26

Introduction Motivation Unintended consequences of student loan program that we should be aware of Need to take into account all costs for cost-benefit analysis Less is known about long-term consequences of holding student debt Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 2 / 26

Introduction Motivation Are growing debt burdens in the right tail of the distribution manageable? Should not ignore positive return to student borrowing What about borrowers who do not complete degree? Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 3 / 26

Introduction Research Questions How do student borrowers fare financially after graduation, compared to similar non-borrowers? Are borrowers who do not complete Bachelor s degree more likely to experience financial hardship? How can we address bias from omitted variables and simultaneity/reverse causality? Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 4 / 26

Introduction Empirical Approach Data from Survey of Consumer Finances Student loans that originated between 1970 and 2010 Observe outcomes in 1995-2010 Instrument for amount borrowed using variations in aggregate borrowing trends Exogenous policy-induced changes in eligibility and take-up Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 5 / 26

Introduction Overview of Findings Conditional on broad measures of educational attainment, student debt linked to credit constraints and bankruptcy $10,000 in student loans increases probability of being turned down by creditors by about 6 percentage points Home ownership rates may also be affected Relationship stronger for non-completers Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 6 / 26

Introduction Post-Graduation Outcomes Affected by Student Debt: Existing Evidence Graduate school attendance (mixed evidence) Career choice and starting salary Specialized studies: Physician specialty choice (limited impact) Law school graduates choice to enter public sector law Entry into marriage Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 7 / 26

Methodology Specification Empirical Model Want to estimate Omitted variable bias: E(Y ) = α(loans) + Xβ Student loans correlated with many unobservables that contribute to financial stability Type of education, academic success, family background,... Possible reverse causality Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 8 / 26

Methodology Specification Empirical Model Two-stage least squares approach First stage: E(Loans) = Xδ + γz The instrument Z equals average amount borrowed per full-time equivalent student (including non-borrowers) in constant dollars in year when respondent was 17 years old From Trends in Student Aid 2012 Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 9 / 26

Methodology Specification Aggregate Borrowing Trends Reauthorizations of the HEA of 1965 New types of aid Expand loan limits and eligibility Interest rate changes Private loan market Increasing gap between costs and grant aid Information availability Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 10 / 26

Methodology Specification Aggregate Borrowing Trends Federal/Private Loans per FTE Student $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Federal Loans per FTE Student Total (Federal+Private) Loans per FTE Student Year Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 11 / 26

Methodology Specification Aggregate Borrowing as Instrument Captures exogenous changes in eligibility and take-up rates Relationship between prevalent borrowing behavior in year of high school graduation and individual s borrowing decisions Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 12 / 26

Methodology SCF Data Survey of Consumer Finances Sample Six cross-sectional surveys conducted between 1995 and 2010 Full student borrowing histories Very detailed information about assets and liabilities Respondents born in 1954 or later - entered college after 1970 Age 29 or older N = 12, 037 Weights make sample nationally representative Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 13 / 26

Methodology SCF Data Student Loans in the SCF All debt accumulated by household members Exact amount and year of each education loan Adjusted for inflation Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 14 / 26

Methodology SCF Data Gicheva Borrowing and Thompson is in constant 2010 Student dollars. Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 15 / 26 Student Loans in the SCF 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% $40.0 $35.0 $30.0 $25.0 $20.0 $15.0 $10.0 $5.0 0.0% 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Share of PEU with any atudent loan debt Average borrowing ($1,000) among those with debt $0.0

Methodology SCF Data Outcomes of Interest Whether denied credit, granted less credit than applied for initially, or did not apply because feared rejection - previous 5 years At least one late payment of bills (60 days or more) - previous 5 years Payment to income ratio over 40% All loans Excluding education loans Excluding education loans and mortgage Whether filed for bankruptcy - previous 10 years Whether owns primary residence Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 16 / 26

Methodology SCF Data Summary Statistics, Outcome Variables (N = 12,037) 60.78% 36.76% 8.56% 11.40% 10.77% 2.15% 8.29% Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 17 / 26

Methodology SCF Data Summary Statistics, Explanatory Variables (N = 12,037) College degree 0.198 Masters degree 0.061 Doctorate 0.012 Female respondent 0.559 White 0.683 Black 0.141 Hispanic 0.111 Age 39.5 (7.2) Any college-age kids in PEU (18-24) 0.109 Disabled (either R or SP) 0.065 Normal income ($1,000) 86.7 (211.8) Predicted wage ($1,000) 51.6 (65.2) Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 18 / 26

Methodology SCF Data Aggregate and Derived Controls Annual average county-level unemployment rate from the BEA County per-capita personal income, relative to national average Predicted wage income Using occupation, demographics, full-time or part-time and self-employment status, years of education Current Population Survey data Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 19 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit 0.0063 *** Bankrupt 0.0068 *** Late Payments 0.0036 ** Home Owner -0.0018 Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 20 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit 0.0063 0.0068 *** *** Bankrupt 0.0068 0.0071 *** *** Late Payments 0.0036 0.0037 ** ** Home Owner -0.0018-0.0023 Education X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 20 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit 0.0063 0.0068 0.0082 *** *** *** Bankrupt 0.0068 0.0071 0.0074 *** *** *** Late Payments 0.0036 0.0037 0.0041 ** ** *** Home Owner -0.0018-0.0023-0.0055 ** Education X X Disabled X College-age kids X Normal income X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 20 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit 0.0063 0.0068 0.0082 0.0073 *** *** *** ** Bankrupt 0.0068 0.0071 0.0074 0.0079 *** *** *** *** Late Payments 0.0036 0.0037 0.0041 0.0027 ** ** *** Home Owner -0.0018-0.0023-0.0055-0.0035 ** Education X X X Disabled X X College-age kids X X Normal income X X County UR X County income X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 20 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (Second Stage) Denied Credit 0.0063 0.0068 0.0082 0.0073 0.0060 *** *** *** ** ** Bankrupt 0.0068 0.0071 0.0074 0.0079 0.0072 *** *** *** *** ** Late Payments 0.0036 0.0037 0.0041 0.0027 0.0023 ** ** *** Home Owner -0.0018-0.0023-0.0055-0.0035-0.0021 ** Education X X X X Disabled X X X College-age kids X X X Normal income X X County UR X X County income X X Predicted wage X Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 20 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (First Stage) F statistic of excluded instrument 57.47 Average loans per FTE 0.00317*** Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 21 / 26

Results Main Sample Results (First Stage) F statistic of excluded instrument 57.47 Average loans per FTE 0.00317*** Female 0.381 College degree 3.601*** Masters degree 9.074*** Doctorate 16.15*** White 3.239** Black 4.280** Hispanic -0.121 Age -0.680** Age sq 0.00679* Any college-age kids 2.356*** Disabled -0.357 County relative per-capita income 1.560* County unemployment rate 0.350*** Predicted earnings 0.912*** Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 21 / 26

Only 2% of students Results who first Non-completers enrolled at a postsecondary institution than $50,000 by 2009. Over 40% did not borrow and another 25% borr Student Debt and College Completion FIGURE 11A Educational Attainment by 2009 of Students First Enrolling in 2003-04, by Total Amount Borrowed (and Overall Percentage of Students in Debt Category) FIGURE 11B Sector Last Attended Recipients Who First Borrowed (and Overa Attained Bachelor s Degree Attained Associate Degree Attained Certificate No Degree, Still Enrolled No Degree, Left Without Return Total 31% 9% 9% 15% 36% Total Cumulative Debt Level $75,001 or more (1%) $50,001 to $75,000 (1%) $30,001 to $50,000 (5%) $20,001 to $30,000 (8%) $10,001 to $20,000 (16%) $1 to $10,000 (25%) Did Not Borrow (43%) 15% 26% 42% 9% Source: Trends in Student Aid, 2012 58% 53% 9% 65% 17% 9% 85% 10% 1% 0% 5% 9% 15% 10% 1% 11% 15% 14% 2% 10% 16% 18% 3% 10% 7% 17% 24% 16% 14% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Percentage NOTE: Percentages in the parentheses on the vertical axis correspond to percentage of all students with th 43% 43% Cumulative Debt Level $75,001 or More (2%) $50,001 to $75,000 (3%) $25,001 to $50,000 (16%) $1 to $25,000 (42%) Did Not Borrow (36%) Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 22 / 26 0%

Results Non-completers Results by College Completion Status 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00-0.02 Denied Credit Bankrupt Late Payments Home Owner -0.04-0.06-0.08-0.10-0.12-0.14 R or SP attend, drop out R & SP attend, R and/or SP drop out R or SP attend, complete R & SP attend, complete Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 23 / 26

Discussion Summary of Findings Student debt likely associated with decreased financial stability Additional $10,000 in student loans predicts 6 percentage point increase in probability of being denied credit over 5 year period and 7 percentage point increase in probability of bankruptcy over 10 year period Borrowers more likely to be late on bill payments Home ownership rates may also be affected Debt management seems particularly hard for non-completers Many confounding factors make establishing causality hard Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 24 / 26

Discussion Why Does Student Debt Lead to Observed Financial Distress? Impact on disposable income, combined with liquidity constraints Debt-to-income ratio and mortgage availability Changing aggregate labor market conditions? If continued decline in the returns to postsecondary education combined with policy-induced increase in borrowing Unlikely - evidence of increasing high school-college wage differential Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 25 / 26

Discussion Why Does Student Debt Lead to Observed Financial Distress? High uncertainty in ex post return to a degree Cannot tell if borrowers are making optimal choices ex ante Particularly bad for non-completers Focus on expected return or better safety net? What is the correct counterfactual? Gicheva and Thompson Student Loans and Financial Stability October 26, 2013 26 / 26