Training on EU policies for Directors of the Region of Sicily. Brussels Office of the Region of Sicily Rue Belliard 12

Similar documents
Cohesion Policy Czech Perspective

Experiences with the implementation of Evaluation plans in structural funds programmes in the Czech Republic

Programming Period. European Social Fund

MTR - Legislative changes affecting the ESI Funds

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

European Union Regional Policy Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

Financial Instruments supported by the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds in

OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME under THE FUND FOR EUROPEAN AID TO THE MOST DEPRIVED

THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS DECREED:

4th MEETING of the High Level Expert Group on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds Gold-plating

The impact of the ESIFs for Lithuanian economy in and the evaluation of development priorities for the programming period

Generating successful projects, developing and managing the project pipeline Trainer: Robin Smail Independent Consultant & Visiting Expert EIPA

Katarina Ivanković Knežević, Assistant Minister Ministry of Labour and Pension System, Republic of Croatia European Parliament, Bruxelles, 7 April

Integrating Europe 2020 in European Territorial Cooperation programmes and projects in the new programming period

Evaluation in : Challenges and Opportunities First annual conference of the National Coordination Authority s Evaluation Unit

Commission services reply to audit-related conclusions and recommendations on gold-plating

Intervention Strand(s)

Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic

Skills and jobs: transnational cooperation and EU programmes Information note (28 February 2013)

From INTERREG IVC to INTERREG EUROPE Info Day

Major projects in the programming period

DRAFT REPORT. EN United in diversity EN. European Parliament 2015/2282(INI)

Challenges of ESIF Implementation. Intermediate Body s perspective

Czech Perspective on Future of Cohesion Policy after 2020

COMMON COMMUNICATION STRATEGY OF EUROPEAN STRUCTURAL AND INVESTMENT FUNDS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC

Overview of the Northern Ireland Ireland - Scotland VA Programme. Electric Vehicles Call Workshop

Cross-cutting audit issues

Public Procurement Action Plan and Study on administrative capacity

3 rd Call for Project Proposals

Simplification and cutting red tape in European Structural and Investment Funds

JASPERS in the programming period

EU FUNDS AFTER THE ACCESSION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION - TOWARDS A NEW FINANCIAL PERSPEKTIVE

Līga Baltiņa Latvia

Energy efficiency obligation schemes, monitoring impacts of eligible measures

Report to the. Contact Committee. of the heads of the Supreme Audit Institutions. of the Member States of the European Union

Welcome and Introduction

The approved ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. ESPON ECP Meeting 9-10 December 2015 in Luxembourg

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

JASPERS Networking Platform

EU Cohesion Policy : proposals from the EU Commission - research & innovation issues -

Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Solidar EU Training Academy. Valentina Caimi Policy and Advocacy Adviser. European Semester Social Investment Social innovation

COHESION POLICY

EU Funds investments and projections, preparation for the period December, 2014

Ensuring result-orientation in Operational Programmes

PLANNING BUREAU SUMMARY. December 2009

WORKING DOCUMENT. EN United in diversity EN

Reporting on financial instruments (FI) in the annual implementation report for the programming period

1. Financial instrument KOFFI

Appendix 7 TERM SHEET

2.European Funding Opportunities

EU Cohesion Policy Proposals from the European Commission

STAKEHOLDER VIEWS on the next EU budget cycle

Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future European Social Fund

L 201/58 Official Journal of the European Union

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of

Investing in regions: The reformed EU Cohesion Policy

ESF Evaluation Partnership 17 November Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF

STANDARD SUMMARY PROJECT FICHE

Index. Executive Summary 1. Introduction 3. Audit Findings 11 MANDATE 1 AUDIT PLAN 1 GENERAL OBSERVATION AND MAIN CONCLUSIONS 1 RECOMMENDATIONS 2

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291 thereof,

Synergies FP7- SFs for Research Infrastructures

THE GREEK ANTI-FRAUD STRATEGY FOR STRUCTURAL ACTIONS - ACTION PLAN (update 2017)

JASPERS Advisory and capacity building support for projects and investment

IPA National Programme 2009 Part II - Bosnia and Herzegovina Fiche 3 Preparation for IPA components III and IV

Setting up a database to assess impacts and effects of certain thresholds and limits in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 (CPR)

This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents

Financial Instruments

Simplifying. Cohesion Policy for Cohesion Policy

ESF Committee - Plenary Session 30 May 2007

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU)

MONTENEGRO. Enhanced control and management of fisheries INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II)

Capital split between compartments

Regional Policy in the Czech Republic in the Period Around Its Accession to the European Union

Interregional cooperation

Prospects for the review of the EU 2020 Strategy, the Juncker Plan and Cohesion Policy after 2020

Implementation of the Technical Assistance measure Brussels, 14 December 2018

Guidance document on. management verifications to be carried out by Member States on operations co-financed by

Challenges Of The Indirect Management Of Eu Funds In Albania

Action Fiche for Syrian Arab Republic. 1. IDENTIFICATION Support to the EU-Syria Association Agreement Programme (SAAP I)

Cost-benefit analysis in the context of EU Cohesion funding - tools, methodology and available support

Table of contents. Introduction Regulatory requirements... 3

Operational Program Innovations and Competitiveness (Draft)

1.Financial Instruments under ESIF Synergies between ESIF and EFSI (Juncker Plan) 3. Commission Guidance on Financial Instruments

amended from time to time concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises

Standard Summary Project Fiche. The project meets the following Accession Partnership priorities:

L 347/174 Official Journal of the European Union

EN 1 EN. Rural Development HANDBOOK ON COMMON MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK. Guidance document. September 2006

Selection of bodies implementing financial instruments under ESIF

AUDIT REFERENCE MANUAL FOR THE STRUCTURAL FUNDS

MONTENEGRO. Support to the Tax Administration INSTRUMENT FOR PRE-ACCESSION ASSISTANCE (IPA II) Action summary

COMMISSION DECISION. of

Screening report Montenegro

LITHUANIAN EXPERIENCE IN IMPLEMENTING EUSBSR

ANNEX ICELAND NATIONAL PROGRAMME IDENTIFICATION. Iceland CRIS decision number 2012/ Year 2012 EU contribution.

POLICY AREA: RESEARCH AND INNOVATION

Standard Summary Project Fiche. Project PL : Improved Tax Administration

Funding opportunities for biodiversity and nature in the EU funding regulations COHESION POLICY

Cohesion Policy Territorial Co-operation

Special Report 1/2004 FP5 (1998 to 2002)

Transcription:

Training on EU policies for Directors of the Region of Sicily Brussels Office of the Region of Sicily Rue Belliard 12

EU Budget CZ state budget Other public budgets Direct gains to contractors Transfers to the EU 15 MSs Indirect benefits import consumption multipliers benefits Cohesion Policy in the CZ 1-2% points CZ GDP GROWTH Private sources Non tangible effects in the CZ - Cultivation of processes; - Measurability, result-oriented approach; - Partnership cooperation.

81.000 new jobs 50.000 co-financed projects Cohesion Policy in the CZ (EU contribution 26,7 bil. EUR) 8 new R&D centres of excellence 1-2% points CZ GDP growth

Physical progress Code Indicator Unit Baseline Target Commitment Actual value 070100 Number of newly created jobs in total Number of jobs 0.0 81 548,0 69 227,4 78 563,9 380100 Number of projects to support SME Number 0.0 4 200,0 4 519,0 3 219,0 110700 111100 370200 370701 370703 610100 610241 632200 Number of supported centres of excellence and regional R&D centres Length of new roads in total (motorways, expressways and roads class I.) Length of reconstructed railway lines (TEN-T outside TEN-T) Length of new and reconstructed roads II and III class in total Number of newly purchased environmentfriendly public transport vehicles Number of reconstructed historical monuments Number 0.0 25,0 40,0 16,0 Number of km 0.0 350,0 137,0 101,0 Number of km 0.0 172,0 257,7 244,0 Number of km 0.0 453,2 460,1 328,1 Number 0.0 1 746,0 2 410,9 1 649,3 Number 0.0 510,0 679,0 608,0

Macroeconomic value of the EU funds Entrepreneurship - improvement of the business environment, creation of new businesses and their development. Innovation - increase in the number of product innovations on the market and creation of jobs (mostly scientific), in the area of technology transfer then setting up of 8 centres of excellence and 40 regional R&D centres. One third of clusters out of the total number of clusters were supported by the EU Funds Significant improvement of transport infrastructure of regional and national importance. Energy sector - higher use of renewable sources and increase energy efficiency and reduction of consumption.

Effect of Cohesion Policy in the CZ for EU-15 countries Estimation for the whole period 2007-2013 6.5 bil EUR in total. Direct + indirect gains from the implementation of Cohesion Policy in the CZ for EU-15 countries: Direct gains emerge from companies contracts in projects cofinanced from Cohesion Policy s programmes (e.g. through daughters of foreign mothers ) - France, Sweden, Germany and Austria in particular. Indirect gains emerge from spill-over effects (imported goods and services from the EU-15 countries) + in the form of consumption multiplier benefits (consequence of extra spending of the CZ consumers).

Comparison of the programming periods 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 Programming period 2007-2013 Programming period 2014-2020 Total allocation 26,7 bilions EUR 20,5 bilions EUR Numbers of OPs Number of the information system Number of types of electronic application Number of Managing autorities 7 Regional OPs 8 Thematic OPs 2 Prague OPs 9 ETC OPs 3 1 3 1 8 Thematic OPs 1 Prague OP 9 ETC Ops 17 (+ intermediate bodies) 10 (+ intermediate bodies)

National Coordination Authority MoRD was appointed as the central methodological and coordination authority for economic, social and territorial cohesion in the 2004-2006, 2007-2013 and 2014-2020 period. European Commission official partner for Cohesion policy; Administrator of the monitoring system; Central methodological authority in the area of the EU funds implementation; Central authority for the area of publicity and building of the absorption capacity; Central authority for the area of the administrative capacity (human resources development).

The European Commission s Partner in the Czech Republic MoRD acted as the EC s central official partner already in 2004-2006 and 2007-2013 programming period. It was in charge of the overall coordination of preparations in the Czech Republic for the 2007-2013 period, which included drawing up the National Development Plan (NDP) and the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF). It is also the EC s primary partner in the Czech Republic for the current programming period (preparation of the Partnership Agreement and overall coordination). Responsible for submitting reports on the implementation of Cohesion policy in the Czech Republic to the EC and working with the EC to resolve any issues that may arise.

Administrator of the monitoring system MoRD makes sure that a uniform information system is in place for managing, coordinating, monitoring and assessing (evaluation) operational programmes and their projects on all administrative and financial management levels. It also manages the information system settings in the following areas: information and data collection, processing, storage, output, assessment and transfer; management systems; and monitoring and communication with the European Commission. It also adds new functional elements to the monitoring system as needed for the implementation of the operational programmes.

Methodological and Coordination Role MoRD is further in charge of coordinating a uniform implementation environment (i.e., an environment in which all institutions engaged in Cohesion policy management in the Czech Republic operate) and managing consulting and other committees and the thematic working groups. The central methodological role of the NCA is carried out by the preparation of methodological documentation in cross-sectional areas common for all operational programmes, such as horizontal topics, public aid, and eligible expenditure. These methodologies (instructions) are imperative (binding) for all managing authorities.

Publicity, Absorption and Administrative Capacity MoRD is in charge of organising a uniform and comprehensible information campaign about utilising resources from the structural funds and the Cohesion Fund in the Czech Republic and coordinating the activities of the managing authorities in this area. The coordination role in the area of institutional capacity ensures that quality personnel exist in the implementing structures. Training of staff contributes to improving administrative capacity, i.e., the ability of the managing authorities to process project applications and programme management. Motivation system is set up to prevent educated and experienced employees from leaving for the private sector.

Principles of single methodological environment for new programming period simplification, digitalization, monitoring system

Why single methodological environment? New principles Thematic concentration and contribution to the EU 2020 strategy Conditionalities Result oriented policy Performance framework necessity to manage Partnership Agreement.

Reduction of administrative burden The basis for setting up the unified methodological environment: Mid-term evaluation 2007-2013; Specific evaluation of OPs; The survey at level of MAs, IB, beneficiaries (2011); Ongoing discussion with partners and stakeholders; Experience of the NCA from two programming periods 2004-2006 and 2007-2013.

Implementation system 2014-2020 Experience of 2007-2013 inconsistent rules on providing subsidies within the program, involving more intermediate bodies (IB); poor enforcement of delegated functions; different administrative procedures with different deadlines within operational programmes involving more IBs; understaffing and lack of experience caused by considerable fluctuations and low motivation of programme administrators. New requirements of new programming period - pressure on functional and quality management and control system MoRD carried out the assessment of different implementation models 2007-2013 Aim: identification of optimal delivery system and specifying the minimum standards of IB.

Recommendation for the implementation system set up MA the only authorizing officer that determinates the strategy within the principle of partnership and the conditions of OP implementation, manages and carries out the control of one IB. IB administration of projects, regional branch consider the scope of the delegated competencies MA IB minimize the number of bodies involved in the management of OP establish minimum requirements due to IB - experienced and sufficient administrative capacity, independence subsidy beneficiaries comprehensive system for applicants and beneficiaries

Reduction of administrative burden 1. Elimination of legislative barriers 2. Simplification of administrative process 3. Ensuring of sufficient administrative capacity Simplification Rules of carrying out the checks and audits

Ad 1. Elimination of legislative barriers Preparation of the legislative environment The obligations laid down in EU legislation. The aim is to ensure a) Compliance of national and EU legislation, b) Reduction of redundant administrative burden. Activities of MoRD Continual analysis of problematic issues, establishment of a platform for discussion, submitting of proposal solutions (main areas of interest financial management and control).

Ad 2. Simplification of administrative process Basic phases of the project cycle (based on analysis of the functioning of the implementation system 2007-2013). Call for submission of projects applications Submission of project application Evaluation and selection of project Implementation of the project, payments, checks The aim: effective management and coordination

Ad 2. Simplification of administrative process The transparency of the implementation system (Improving the selection criteria and the transparency of the selection process, set up the system of consultancy within the preparation phase of projects, carrying out the controls of public procurement) Control system (methodology of procedures, harmonization of control plans, elimination of duplicity in carrying out the controls) Uniform and clear terminology and rules Individual processes and procedures shall be continuous and have a clearly defined deadlines (clear rules, monitoring and assessment) Project administration should be fully computerized

Single Methodological Environment (SME) Approved by Government on 15 May 2013 The MoRD was entrusted with the preparation of methodical environment in areas of programmes preparation, management and monitoring of ESIF. The MF was entrusted with the preparation of methodical environment in areas of financial flows, control and audit. The principle of partnership is respected in the preparation of guidelines (experts of MAs, regional stakeholders and potential applicants and beneficiaries). Instructions binding, issued by the gov. resolution. Guidelines recommendations, best practice. Opinion issued by the minister in case of urgent need to amend the instruction.

Single methodological environment Standardization of the rules and procedures shall lead to: - Effectiveness and economy of the ESIF use - Low administrative burden - Transparency of the ESIF management Tools: Clear distinction of roles and responsibilities in the MS2014+; Mainstreaming of the methodological guidance; Reduction of the number of instruction and guidance documents; Reduction of the need to amend methodologies; Introduction and use of the uniform terminology; Set up of the harmonized, binding and enforceable rules; Streamlining of the information flow to the beneficiaries and Transparent publicity of the ESIF management

Examples of the simplification - harmonisation of the requirements related to the rules and conditions for beneficiaries; - stronger emphasis on management of the calls for proposals and their coordination; - stronger emphasis on two round selection; - opportunity to appeal against decision of the MA; - common database of the project evaluators and automatic (random) selection; - maximum length for administrative processes set up; - possibility to use CBA;

Examples of the simplification - harmonisation and simplification of monitoring reports models; - templates and models for public tenders; - central planning of the financial controls and their coordination; - standardized control checklists; - introduction of the negligible amount (irregularities under 40 EUR not treated); - simplification of requirements related to publicity and harmonisation of sanctions for breaching the publicity rules.

Computerization of the administration Single monitoring system should provide for significant reduction of the administrative burden through computerization of the administration. Based on the requirements of e-governement (e-account, e-mail, e- comunication between other information systems of public administration). Simplification of the ESIF management (templates, trial applications, CBA). Thorough monitoring ensures up to date information about the state of the play. Improves management and control role of the NCA (monitoring of the administrative processes, alert system, risk management).

Ad 3. Administrative capacity The aim is to ensure stable, competent and experienced administrative capacity able to support effective EU funds implementation. Sufficient capacity (plan of administration capacity) Competencies and responsibilities (stabilization of administration capacity and development of HR) Instruction covers themes as: Personnel Planning Methodology Staff recruitment and adaptation Management and assessment of working abilities Professional training Remuneration of employees Dismissal of employees

Thank you for your attention!