Case Study: Asset Forfeiture Steve West (Moderator) Assistant US Attorney Eastern District of North Carolina Lester Joseph Manager, Global Financial Crimes Intelligence Group Wells Fargo & Co. Douglas Miller Special Agent, US Treasury Dept. IRS Criminal Investigations Timothy Reilly Supervisory Special Agent IRS Criminal Investigations
AN INTRODUCTION TO ASSET FORFEITURE Steve West Assistant U.S. Attorney Eastern District of North Carolina (919) 856-4530 Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 3
WHAT IS ASSET FORFEITURE? Asset forfeiture is the taking of property derived from a crime, "involved in" a crime, or that which makes a crime easier to commit or harder to detect. Asset forfeiture is either punitive or remedial. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 4
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF ASSET FORFEITURE? Punish the criminal. Deter the illegal activity. Remove the tools of the trade. Disrupt the organization. Return the assets to the victim. Protect the community. Use the money for law enforcement. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 5
STATUTORY BASES FOR FORFEITURE Forfeitures must be authorized by specific statute: Controlled substance offenses Money laundering, mail and wire fraud, other financial crimes Organized crime/ racketeering Structuring and other currency violations Crimes listed as specified unlawful activity Terrorism, financing of terrorism Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 6
THEORIES OF FORFEITURE Proceeds Facilitation Property "Involved In" Money Laundering Terrorism Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 7
THEORIES OF FORFEITURE: PROCEEDS Proceeds means: Any property that is traceable to the illegal activity for which the applicable statute provides forfeiture authority. Any property traceable to the original proceeds. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 8
THEORIES OF FORFEITURE: PROPERTY INVOLVED IN MONEY LAUNDERING Money laundering statutes authorize forfeiture of all property "involved in" a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956, 1957, or 1960, including: all the property used to commit the offense; or any property used to facilitate the underlying offense. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 9
THEORIES OF FORFEITURE: TERRORISM The forfeiture statute for terrorism was enacted in October 2001. If someone is engaged in planning or perpetrating acts of domestic or international terrorism, the government may seize and forfeit all assets, foreign or domestic. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 10
SEIZURES UNDER THE MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL ACT: PROCEEDS Authorizes forfeiture of the proceeds of many federal crimes and some state crime, like Mail and wire fraud; Bank fraud; Arson; Gambling; and Interstate transport of stolen property. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 11
SEIZURES UNDER THE MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL ACT: MONEY LAUNDERING (1956) Also forfeits all property involved in a money laundering violation. Money laundering is: SUA (Specified Unlawful Activity) + FT Intent) = $$$$$ (Forfeiture). (Financial Transaction) + SI (Specific Specific intent means using the ill-gotten gains of crime in a financial transaction with the intent to Conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of the proceeds; or Promote the carrying on of further illegal activity. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 12
SEIZURES UNDER THE MONEY LAUNDERING CONTROL ACT: MONEY LAUNDERING (1957) Does not require specific intent Functions as a money spending forfeiture Requires: Knowing engagement in monetary transaction Criminally derived property > $10,000 Which is in fact proceeds from an SUA Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 13
TYPES OF FORFEITURES Administrative Criminal Judicial Civil Judicial Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 14
ADMINISTRATIVE FORFEITURE Property forfeited to the United States without judicial involvement. Seizures must be based on probable cause. Makes up the majority of forfeiture proceedings and can seize any amount of currency. Includes personal property valued up to $500,000. No administrative forfeiture of real property. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 15
CRIMINAL JUDICIAL FORFEITURE In personam action that includes forfeiture of property in a criminal indictment. Requires a conviction of the crime for which the forfeiture is authorized. Can only forfeit defendant s interest. Requires preponderance of the evidence. Allows for substitute assets. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 16
CIVIL JUDICIAL FORFEITURE In rem proceeding brought against property. No criminal conviction required. Connection between the crime and the property must be proven. Limited to property traceable to the offense. No substitute assets. Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 17
POINTS OF CONTACT GOVT/BANKS 1. Investigative for example, SARs 2. Service of seizure warrant or restraining order 3. Protection of bank s interest by virtue of deed of trust on real property or UCC filing Identifying Assets for Forfeiture 18
Subpoenas Big banks get thousands of subpoenas Serve your subpoena properly Be specific about what you want Ask for everything but work with the bank to get what you really want. Find someone to talk to at the bank. Ask for expedited service only when you need it. Banks will be happy to join the investigative team.
ASSETS FORFEITURE FUND AND SEIZED ASSET DEPOSIT FUND ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FISCAL YEAR 2012 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division Audit Report 13-07 January 2013
Note 7. Forfeited and Seized Property (continued) (page 44 & 45) Analysis of Changes in Seized Property -- For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2012 FY 2011 FY 2012 Difference % Change Total Seizures44,534 43,566-968 -2.17% Total amount seized $4,041,929,000 $1,785,240,000 $2,256,689,000-55.83%
Federal Money Laundering Enforcement Efforts Lag Article published on December 14, 2012. Persons citing the information should credit TRAC, Syracuse University. (Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse) Source: http://www.trac.syr.edu/tracreports/crim/303/ Drug Related Other All Money Laundering Number FY 2012 88 222 310 % Change from previous year -12% 0% -3.7% % Change from 7 years ago -60% -24% -40% % Change from 10 years ago -30% 30% 4.7% The data obtained by TRAC as a result of a multi-year effort under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) categorizes the money laundering cases under two broad groups: narcotic-related matters ("drug") and non-drug-related ("other"). The latest available data from the Justice Department show that for the recently ended 2012 fiscal year the federal government prosecuted 310 individuals for criminal money laundering offenses. According to the case-by-case information analyzed by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), this number is down 4% from the previous fiscal year when the number of prosecutions totaled 322.
Drug Related ML Prosecutions In the drug area, however, money laundering prosecutions in FY 2012 were at an all time low, 12 percent lower than the previous year, down 60 percent from the high reached seven years ago and down 30 percent from a decade ago. Article published on December 14, 2012 Persons citing the information should credit TRAC, Syracuse University. (Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse)
Non Drug Related ML Prosecutions For the larger group of non-drug cases, the annual total of individuals charged in federal court are significantly down from the highs that were achieved during the first two years of President Bush's second term. Article published on December 14, 2012 Persons citing the information should credit TRAC, Syracuse University. (Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse)