Estimated Federal Impact of a Proposal to Shift Hospice Spending to Medicare Advantage

Similar documents
Medicare Advantage (MA) Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2020: In Brief

Medicare Advantage: Program Overview and Recent Experience. James Cosgrove, Ph.D. Director, Health Care U.S. Government Accountability Office

Medicare payment policy and its impact on program spending

Exhibit 2. Medicare Enrollment,

Dual-eligible beneficiaries S E C T I O N

Affordable Care Act Update: Implementing Medicare Costs Savings

Federal Spending on Brand Pharmaceuticals. April 2011

2018 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

The 2018 Advance Notice and Draft Call Letter for Medicare Advantage

The Independent Payment Advisory Board And its Limited Impact on Medicare Spending

Deep Dive Medicare Advantage Advance Notices Part I and II

S E C T I O N. National health care and Medicare spending

Medicare Overview. James Cosgrove, Director U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) February 8, 2013

Introduction to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payment Process

An Overview of the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefit

Medicare Advantage Plan Payment Rates and Plan Bids Relative to Traditional Medicare, 2009 and 2017

The Fundamentals of Medicare. Jim Hahn, CRS National Health Policy Forum February 11, 2011

Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) January Meeting Summary

Modifying Medicare s Benefit Design:

2016 ADVANCE NOTICE: CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS AND BENEFICIARIES

Medicare Cost Sharing and Supplemental Coverage

2019 Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Cost Performance Category Fact Sheet

Cal MediConnect CY 2017 Draft Medicare Rate Report May 31, 2016

HEALTH CARE COSTS ARE THE PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE DEBT

Medicaid Funding Reform: Impact on Dual Eligible Beneficiaries

Part One: FEDERAL POLICY AND MEDICARE S IMPACT ON THE ECONOMY

National Health Expenditure Accounts

Medicare Comprehensive ESRD Care (CEC) Initiative

Provisions of the Medicare Modernization Act

What Every Actuary Should Know About Medicare From Structure to Reform

New Options in Medicare Advantage: Addressing the Social Determinants of Health and More

HEALTH CARE COSTS ARE THE PRIMARY DRIVER OF THE DEBT

Appendix B. LDO Financial Methodology (LDO CEC Model)

Medicare Advantage Benefit Flexibility (Supplemental Benefits and Uniformity)

H.R. 849 Protecting Seniors Access to Medicare Act

MEDICARE ADVANTAGE MA Plans. to $28 per month 46% HOW HEALTH SYSTEMS CAN THRIVE WITH. Developing Your Medicare Advantage Strategy PRODUCT

Medicare Program Structure

Focus Report The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) April 2016 Meeting April 2016

Medicare Advantage: 2015 National Snapshot

Medicare: The Basics

Medicare s different models for caring for beneficiaries with chronic conditions. Mark E. Miller, PhD March 11, 2015

How the Congressional Budget Office Uses Demographic Data

SECTION 6. Health Care Spending

CHRONIC Care Act: Making the Case for LTSS in Medicare Advantage Supplemental Benefits


Cal MediConnect CY 2014 Rate Report

Medicare and the New Health Care Law

An Overview of Medicare

Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative CY 2015 Final Rate Report March 20, 2015

The Medicare Advantage program: Status report

TRACKING MEDICARE HEALTH AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLANS Monthly Report for April 2007

Understanding Private- Sector Medicare

MEDICARE PART D POLICY FORMULARY: TRANSITION PROCESS Policy Number: 6-C

ARE THE 2004 PAYMENT INCREASES HELPING TO STEM MEDICARE ADVANTAGE S BENEFIT EROSION? Lori Achman and Marsha Gold Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.

Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

CHIA METHODOLOGY PAPER MASSACHUSETTS TOTAL HEALTH CARE EXPENDITURES AUGUST center for health information and analysis

Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA): Summary and Timeline

National Health Policy Forum April 28, 2005 Sally Burner CMS

2016 Medicare Deductibles and Premiums

Coverage Expansion [Sections 310, 323, 324, 341, 342, 343, 344, and 1701]

REPORT 10 OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE (A-07) Strategies to Strengthen the Medicare Program (Reference Committee A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

How Health Reform Saves Consumers and Taxpayers Money

Medicare Program Changes in Senate-Passed H.R. 3590

Making the most of Medicare

NOTE TO: Medicare Advantage Organizations, Prescription Drug Plan Sponsors, and Other Interested Parties

Part II: Medicare Part C and Part D

TRACKING MEDICARE HEALTH AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLANS Monthly Report for March 2007

The Basics of Medicare, Updated With the 2005 Board of Trustees Report

BACKGROUNDER. Medicare Advantage (MA) offers seniors the option of private

Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Reform / Estimating the Federal Budgetary Effects of the AHCA/NCAL/Alliance Proposal

First a word about the rising cost of retiree healthcare

Comparing Traditional Medicare to Medicare Advantage

Eighteen years ago, Henry Aaron, Barry Bosworth, and

The Under Age 65 Project

Session 1: Mandated Report: Medicare Payment for Ambulance Services

SNF Market Trends. Understanding the Changes Impacting Our Business. Trend 1: Medicaid Managed Care

Medicare. Presented by Courtney Henderson Medicare Sales Specialist

2017 Medicare Basics. Module 1

Proposed Changes to Medicare in the Path to Prosperity Overview and Key Questions

CMS 2016 Call Letter Summary

Prospective vs. Retrospective. Will Bundled Payment Really Be.. Fee For Service

Medicare-Medicaid Alignment Initiative CY 2016 Final Rate Report November 1, 2016

Medicare Advantage Value-Based Insurance Design Model Test. Responses to Stakeholder Inquiries. Last updated: November 10, 2015

Public Sector Plans: Medicare & Medicaid

Choosing Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage

Douglas W. Charnas, Esq. 900 Lawyers 19 Offices

Understanding the Bidding Process

Better Medicare Alliance Webinar: Medicare Advantage and Part D 2019 Advance Notice and Draft Call Letter. February 8, 2018

Medicare: Changes, Challenges, and Opportunities for Grantmakers

Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013

Changes to Medicare under the Affordable Care Act

2019 ADVANCE NOTICE: CHANGES TO MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PAYMENT METHODOLOGY AND THE POTENTIAL EFFECT ON MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ORGANIZATIONS

Overview of New Benefit Flexibilities in Medicare Advantage

TRACKING MEDICARE HEALTH AND PRESCRIPTION DRUG PLANS Monthly Report for October 2007

Paying More for Less

Medicare and Budget Sequestration

CHAPTER 1. Trends in the Overall Health Care Market

Medicare: Part B Premiums

Estimate of Federal Payment Reductions to Hospitals Following the ACA

ONLINE APPENDIX. Can Health Insurance Competition Work? Evidence from Medicare Advantage. by Curto, Einav, Levin, and Bhattacharya

Transcription:

To: National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization From: Avalere Health Date: Re: Estimated Federal Impact of a Proposal to Shift Hospice Spending to Medicare Advantage Summary The National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (NHPCO) asked Avalere Health (Avalere) to estimate the federal costs or savings from a proposal to modify spending on hospice care for Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan. Under current law, if a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in an MA plan elects hospice care, the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) program is responsible for payments to hospice providers as well as for any medical care unrelated to the terminal diagnosis rather than the MA plan. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) has recently developed a policy recommendation that would instead require the MA plan to maintain primary payer responsibility for all payments for hospice enrollees. We estimate this proposal would increase federal spending by $1.3 billion over the 2015-2024 federal budget window. This amount reflects a combination of an estimated $64.9 billion in new payments to MA plans to account for the estimated costs of hospice enrollees, offset by an estimated $63.6 billion in lower spending on hospice enrollees in the traditional FFS program. Since MA plans provide care on a calendar year basis, these estimates assume implementation starting in CY 2015. Estimated Change in Federal Spending due to Shifting Hospice Spending to Medicare Advantage $ in billions, by fiscal year Total change in Federal spending 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2015-2024 Increase in MA payments 3.9 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.9 6.4 7.1 7.8 8.6 9.4 64.9 Decrease in FFS spending -3.8-5.1-5.1-5.4-5.8-6.3-7.0-7.7-8.4-9.1-63.6 Net change due to proposed legislation 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.3

Page 2 Background Once a Medicare beneficiary is diagnosed with a terminal condition, he or she may elect to enroll in hospice to receive palliative care and forgo aggressive curative treatments. All care related to the terminal condition is provided by the hospice provider, which receives a daily payment from the Medicare fee-for-service program (FFS) to cover the costs of providing this care. The Medicare FFS system also covers the payment for any treatment outside of the hospice system for conditions that are unrelated to the hospice enrollee s terminal diagnosis. Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are not responsible for covering the costs of hospice care nor any spending on care unrelated to the terminal diagnosis for hospice enrollees. Once an MA enrollee elects to receive hospice care, the traditional FFS program assumes the primary payer responsibility for these individuals. However, the individual is still considered enrolled in the MA plan. The MA plan remains responsible for providing any supplemental benefits to the hospice enrollee, including services such as vision and dental care. In addition, if the hospice enrollee receives care unrelated to the terminal diagnosis from an in-network provider with the MA plan, the enrollee is only required to pay the MA plan cost sharing amount, and the MA plan is required to pay the difference between the in-network and the traditional FFS cost sharing amounts. If the hospice enrollee receives care from an out-of-network provider, the enrollee is responsible for the entire FFS cost sharing amount. 1 MA plans submit a bid to cover traditional FFS costs in each of their markets. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) compares each plan s bid to a local benchmark which reflects the average FFS spending for individuals residing in the same market area. This benchmark ranges from 95 percent to 115 percent of the local FFS costs, depending on a variety of factors. If a plan bids below the benchmark, it receives a portion of the difference in the form of a rebate. The rebate must be used by the plan to offer additional benefits to enrollees. Importantly, the benchmark for each market does not include any payments made by the FFS program for hospice enrollees, including payments to hospice providers as well as payments for care unrelated to the terminal diagnosis. 2 Once an MA enrollee elects hospice care, the plan no longer receives the portion of payment that was based on its bid. However, the MA plan still receives the rebate portion of the payment for hospice enrollees, minus any amounts that the MA plan allocated to reduce the enrollee s Part B or Part D premium. The MA plan is expected to use the rebate dollars to cover any supplemental benefits that a hospice enrollee requires, as outlined above. Recently, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) developed a recommendation to Congress that would require MA plans to cover the costs for MA enrollees who elect hospice care. At its November 2013 meeting, MedPAC staff noted that such a policy would promote coordination and care management and synchronize Medicare policy across delivery systems, while also noting that the policy could reduce the number of hospices that MA 1 Medicare Managed Care Manual, Chapter 8 Payments to Medicare Advantage Organizations, available at https://www.cms.gov/regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/mc86c08.pdf. 2 Advance Notice of Methodological Changes for Calendar Year (CY) 2012 for Medicare Advantage (MA) Capitation Rates, Part C and Part D Payment Policies and 2012 Call Letter, available at http://cms.gov/medicare/health- Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Downloads/Advance2012.pdf.

Page 3 enrollees could choose from as well as increase administrative costs for MA plans and hospice providers. 3 Data Sources We used the following data sources to develop our estimate: 2013 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplemental Medical Insurance Trust Funds. Congressional Budget Office. May 2013 Medicare Baseline. 2010-2012 Medicare 5 Percent Limited Data Sets for all settings of care Assumptions and Methodology Hospice Spending and Utilization under Current Law The 2013 Medicare Trustees Report estimates that hospice spending will be $17 billion in 2015, increasing to $37 billion by 2024. In addition, historical data suggests that approximately 2.5 percent of all Medicare enrollees use hospice services each year; we have assumed this ratio will remain constant over the next 10 years. We separately developed an estimate of Medicare spending on hospice enrollees for care unrelated to the terminal diagnosis. Using the Medicare claims data, we identified all Medicare beneficiaries who elected hospice in 2011 or 2012. In order to measure the total spending on unrelated care after the election of hospice, we excluded any hospice enrollee who had a live discharge. The analysis therefore includes enrollees who died in either year or were still alive and receiving hospice care at the end of 2012. We then measured total Medicare payments to non-hospice providers for this group of hospice enrollees. In order to avoid counting claims from providers for care prior to the election of hospice that may have been submitted for payment after the hospice start date, we included the spending for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and physicians if the date of service was seven or more days after the election of hospice. Due to the monthly claims submission process for home health or durable medical equipment providers, we only included Medicare spending from these providers if the date of service was 30 or more days after election of hospice. After these adjustments, we estimate that Medicare paid approximately $443 million in 2012 on hospice enrollees for care unrelated to their terminal diagnosis. This represents 0.2 percent of all non-hospice FFS spending. Since we estimate a relatively stable percentage of the Medicare population will use hospice services over the next 10 years, we also assumed that spending for unrelated care on hospice enrollees would represent the same percentage of total FFS spending. Using the expected growth in total FFS cost from the CBO, we estimate that Medicare will spend $583 million for this care in 2015, increasing to $1.2 billion in 2024. Hospice Use by MA Enrollees A recent study found that, after controlling for various demographic factors, MA enrollees had a higher rate of hospice use in the year preceding death than FFS enrollees. 4 The study found 3 MedPAC Medicare managed care topics. Presentation to the Commission on November 8, 2013. Available online at http://www.medpac.gov/transcripts/ma_topics11_13l.pdf.

Page 4 that the difference in election rates had narrowed between 2003 and 2009. MedPAC recently reached a similar conclusion using 2011 claims data, finding that 49 percent of MA decedents and 44 percent of FFS decedents used hospice. 5 For purposes of determining the federal impact of this proposal, however, we investigated the percentage of hospice enrollees who were enrolled in an MA plan versus traditional FFS. Using the same sample of beneficiaries as described above, we found that 24.2 percent of hospice enrollees in 2011 and 25.6 percent of hospice enrollees in 2012 were also MA enrollees at the time of hospice election. In the entire Medicare program, 25.5 percent of beneficiaries were enrolled in MA in 2011 and 27.0 percent were enrolled in MA in 2012. This suggests the distribution of MA-to-total enrollment in hospice is approximately 5 percent lower than the distribution of MA-to-total enrollment in the overall Medicare program. To estimate hospice participation for MA enrollees in the future, we assumed the distribution would remain approximately 5 percent lower than the overall rate of MA enrollment. We calculated the adjusted ratio using the expected MA distribution from the CBO through 2023, and then applied this rate to our total expected hospice enrollment as described above. Using this process, we estimate in 2015 that 373,000 hospice enrollees will be enrolled in MA, increasing to 433,000 hospice enrollees in MA by 2024. MA Payments for Hospice Enrollees under Current Law Since MA plans are paid the rebate amount for MA enrollees who elect hospice, we determined the average rebate amount that will be paid to plans over the next 10 years. We first used the average bid and rebate amount as published in the 2013 Medicare Trustees Report. These estimates suggest that rebates will represent between five and six percent of total payments to MA plans over the next decade. We then applied this ratio to the total estimated payment to MA plans from the CBO. Based on this analysis, we estimate the average MA plan will receive an annual rebate payment of $539 per enrollee in 2015, increasing to $935 per enrollee in 2024. Estimating MA Payments for Hospice Enrollees under MedPAC Proposal In order to determine how payments to MA plans would change if all spending on hospice enrollees remained the responsibility of the MA plan, we determined how the MA benchmarks would change if FFS spending on hospice enrollees was added to the calculation. We excluded the estimated spending associated with MA enrollees, in order to determine the amount only applicable to individuals in the FFS program. We assumed that both hospice spending as well as spending on care unrelated to the terminal condition is the same for the average FFS hospice enrollee as well as the average MA hospice enrollee. This assumption is based on an analysis of the Medicare claims data for these individuals wherein we determined that the average length of hospice stay was the same in 2011 and 2012 for both types of enrollees. To calculate the expected increase in MA benchmarks, we took the total estimated spending on all hospice enrollees minus the estimated spending on MA hospice enrollees in each year. We assumed this entire amount would be added to the MA benchmarks. Since MA benchmarks are expressed on a per capita basis, we divided this total spending by the estimated number of FFS 4 Stevenson, David et. al. Service Use at the End-of-Life in Medicare Advantage Versus Traditional Medicare. Medical Care. 2013; 51(10): 931-937 5 MedPAC Medicare managed care topics. Presentation to the Commission on November 8, 2013.

Page 5 enrollees in the entire Medicare program in each year. Using this process, we estimate that MA benchmarks would increase by an average of $341 in 2015 and $531 in 2024. This represents an approximate 3.5 to 3.7 percent increase relative to the current estimated benchmark amounts. We then estimated the increase in payments to MA plans. We assumed that plans will bid at the same ratio to FFS costs as under baseline expectations. According to estimates from the 2013 Medicare Trustees Report, the average MA plan bid will range from 97 to 98 percent of FFS costs over the next 10 years. We applied these ratios to the estimated increase in MA benchmarks and multiplied the new estimated bid by the total MA enrollment to calculate the increase in MA payments. Notably, since MA plans are already paid the rebate amounts for hospice enrollees, we did not assume any change in the rebate payments to plans. We have not included any additional administrative costs that plans may occur from contracting and paying for hospice providers, not have we included any assumed efficiencies that plans may develop from creating networks of lower-cost hospice providers. In addition, we have not assumed any fundamental change in the risk adjustment methodology that CMS uses to adjust payments to plans. Estimating FFS Payments for Hospice Enrollees under MedPAC Proposal After estimating the increase in MA payments, we next determined the expected decrease in FFS spending. Using the same assumptions as described above, we estimate that approximately 27 percent of FFS spending on hospice enrollees in 2015 would be for individuals in MA plans, and that this ratio would vary depending on the percentage of MA enrollees in the overall Medicare program. We reduced total FFS spending by the annual percentage of MA hospice enrollees.