Tax incentives on Research and Development (R&D) 16 September 2014

Similar documents
Software and innovation deduction: Belgium is the place to be! 23 November 2017

1. Corporate Income Tax

Belgian R&D tax incentives

RSM InterTax Tax Insights February Belgian corporate income tax reform

Is it time for your country to consider the "patent box"?

Investment deduction for R&D

BELGIUM GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

The International Tax Landscape

THE FUTURE OF TAX PLANNING: TRANSPARENCY AND SUBSTANCE FOR ALL? Friday, 26 February AM PM Conrad Hotel, Hong Kong

Cyprus Tax Update. Kyiv May 2018

Competition for R&D tax incentives in the European Union how an optimal R&D system shall be designed

International Tax Belgium Highlights 2018

BEPS and ATAD: Where do we stand?

THE KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT BOX Public Consultation JANUARY 2015

International Tax Planning and Prevention of Abuse. A Study under Domestic Tax Law, Tax Treaties and EC Law in relation to Conduit and Base Companies

The Knowledge Development Box ( KDB ) Public Consultation Paper. We are writing to respond to the above named document issued on 14 January 2015.

continued on page 14 BY OLIVER FELSENSTEIN AND CHRISTOPH KUEPPERS (LOVELLS) continued on page 2

BUSINESS IN THE UK A ROUTE MAP

Comparison of Key Anti-Base Erosion Rules in the Tax Reform Act of 2017 and under UK Tax Law Calum Dewar, PwC Mike Williams, HM Treasury

GERMANY GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

New Swiss corporate tax developments : A paradigm shift?

THE INTERSECTION OF TAX & TREASURY

IMPACT OF TAX ON M&A. Simon Fletcher 14 October 2016

Cross-border Outsourcing

REVISED SWISS CORPORATE TAX REFORM WILL KEEP SWITZERLAND A TOP CORPORATE LOCATION

IBFD Course Programme Current Issues in International Tax Planning

Gijs Fibbe (Baker Tilly / Erasmus University) Bart Le Blanc (Norton Rose Fulbright) Andrew Roycroft (Norton Rose Fulbright) September 25, 2017

Skatteverket International Tax Planning 2016 CORIT

Tax Obstacles in Cross Border Planning

Impact of BEPS and Other International Tax Risks on the Jersey Funds Industry

1. What are recent tax developments in your country which are relevant for M&A deals?

European Commission publishes Anti Tax Avoidance Package

Belgian corporate tax reform takes effect

International Tax Poland Highlights 2018

Information Sheet No. 66. The New Intellectual Property (IP) Tax Regime in Cyprus

CYPRUS GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

The UAE has joined the Inclusive Framework on BEPS

Tax Reform (TRAF / Tax Proposal 17) Webcast of 2 October 2018

THE NETHERLANDS GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Analysis of New Law UK CORPORATE TAX REFORM. Nikol Davies *

ROMANIA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

Robert Pasternak, Attorney at law and Partner in Charge of Deloitte Legal. Poland

BEPS Action 5 Harmful Tax Competition A developing country perspective. Prof. Dr. Luís Eduardo Schoueri

21% 21% The Regional Finance Law provides that RAM can set a rate 20% lower than that applicable in Mainland Portugal 2.

Summary and conclusions

Tax Planning International Review

International Tax Portugal Highlights 2018

IBFD Course Programme Current Issues in International Tax Planning

BEPS ACTION 2: NEUTRALISE THE EFFECTS OF HYBRID MISMATCH ARRANGEMENTS

FOCUS INTERNATIONAL. October 2015 Cyprus edition. New legislation opens Cyprus for more business. Cyprus citizenship and residency schemes

The Finance Act for Enactment of a new timetable for the decrease of the rate of the corporate income tax. Repeal of the 3% tax on dividends

EU Commission approves enhancements to Madeira International Business Center Tax Regime

Plenary: global trends impacting international tax planning and a US tax update

Parent Subsidiary Directive and Interest and Royalty Directive

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Building a fair, competitive and stable corporate tax system for the EU

Transfer Pricing Forum

Executive summary. EY Global Tax Alert Library

SWITZERLAND GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

International Tax Malta Highlights 2019

International Tax South Africa Highlights 2018

EU state aid and other developments. 18 November 2016

SWISS CORPORATE TAX REFORM POSTPONED

IFA Congress 2012 Boston Subject 1: Enterprise Services

LUXEMBOURG GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2018 EDITION

EU CONSTRAINTS ON RECENT AND EXPECTED CHANGES IN SPAIN. María Teresa Soler Roch

SELECTED ASPECTS OF THE TAXATION OF FOREIGN ENTITIES IN SLOVAK TAX LAW

Intellectual property in the age of BEPS

Study on Structures of Aggressive Tax Planning and Indicators

PAPER 3.01 EU DIRECT TAX OPTION

The Canton of Solothurn a fiscally attractive business location

International tax competition: Research and development

1. What are recent tax developments in your country which are relevant for M&A deals?

International Tax Italy Highlights 2018

FINLAND GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

STEP Silicon Valley Ireland: Gateway to Accessing the EU Market

International Tax Malta Highlights 2018

ARGENTINA GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX: 2017 EDITION

Headquarter Jurisdictions Around the World: A Comparison

Intellectual Property Box Regimes

CPA Esther Wahome. Thursday, 16 August 2018

Annual International Bar Association Conference Sydney, Australia. Recent Developments in International Taxation. France

Ireland Country Profile

To what extent does Cyprus still present advantages in international tax planning? The Switzerland EC savings tax agreement: a positive result?

Luxembourg Parliament adopts new IP regime

International Tax Slovakia Highlights 2019

OECD releases final BEPS package

TEI Tax Summit Asia Pacific. Hong Kong 31 August Baker & McKenzie

Despite being among the

Hybrid Entities; avoidance of double (non-) taxation under the Parent-Subsidiary Directive and the OECD Model Tax Convention

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document. Proposal for a Council Directive

A paper issued by the European Federation of Accountants (FEE)

International Tax Canada Highlights 2018

Withholding tax in the era of BEPS, CIVs and digital economy IFA 2018 Korea Congress / Main subject 2 Luxembourg branch Report

Tax Summit 2017 THE EU ANTI-TAX-AVOIDANCE DIRECTIVE taking a further look at the GAAR 27 October 2017

International Tax Spain Highlights 2018

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

LEGAL ALERT LUXEMBOURG UPCOMING TAX CHANGES NOVEMBER

Belgium Country Profile

A8-0189/ Proposal for a directive (COM(2016)0026 C8-0031/ /0011(CNS)) Text proposed by the Commission

International Tax Latvia Highlights 2019

Transcription:

www.pwc.com Tax incentives on Research and Development (R&D) 16 Belgian Branch reporters Marc De Mil International Tax Expert, Federal Public Service Finance Tom Wallyn Tax Director, Agenda 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Brief overview of business income taxation 1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.6 Procedural requirements Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.1 Introduction 2.2. Eligible taxpayers and territorial scope of R&D incentives 2.3. Patent box regimes and harmful tax competition 2.4 Intangibles and BEPS situations 2 1

Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 3 Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 1.1 Introduction 4 2

Introduction EU 2020 Strategy 3% GDP spent on R&D incentives (currently 2%) Belgian company Acquisition of patents One-time R&D investment deduction / R&D tax credit External contract R&D In house R&D One-time or spread R&D investment deduction / R&D tax credit Payroll tax exemption Expat regime R&D funding R&D centre Funding Licensing Sales Licenses to third parties Patent income deduction on patent license fees Sales to customers Patent income deduction on patent remuneration embedded in sales price of patented products Notional interest deduction Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 1.2 Brief overview of business income taxation 6 3

1.2 Brief overview of business income taxation P.M. 7 Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 8 4

1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.1 General tax climate for R&D 1.3.2 Reasons for introducing R&D incentives 1.3.3 R&D incentives, equality of treatment and ability to pay 1.3.4 Subjective scope 1.3.5 R&D incentives: MNEs versus SMEs? 1.3.6 Definition of R&D for tax purposes 9 1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.1 General tax climate for R&D Profit centre >< cost centre Competitive location Cost centre - Investment deduction - Personnel Expat Reduction of withholding tax Upfront certainty 10 5

1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.2 Reasons for introducing R&D incentives European pressure National policy - Regional policy - Stimulating research and manufacturing - Extension of all companies 11 1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.3 R&D incentives, equality of treatment and ability to pay Almost absence of discussion Belgian >< foreign 12 6

1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.4 Subjective scope Incentives - Limited to companies Patent income deduction Tax exoneration for regional grants) - Limited to non-resident personal taxation Expat status for foreign researchers - Applicable in corporate taxation and in personal income taxation but applicable in a different way Investment deduction, tax credit for R&D 13 1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.4 Subjective scope - Applicable in corporate taxation and in personal income taxation and applicable in the same way Wage withholding tax exemption for researchers, tax allowance for additional employees, innovation premiums 14 7

1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.5 R&D incentives: MNEs versus SMEs? In general, no specific R&D incentives tailored to SME s Discussion PID - Policy - Practice - Change in tax legislation 15 1.3 Tax policy considerations relating to R&D incentives 1.3.6 Definition of R&D for tax purposes OECD 2002 Frascati Manual European Regulation N 800/2008 R&D: Creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new application Fundamental, industrial and experimental research 16 8

Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 1.4 R&D input incentives 17 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.1 General overview of R&D input incentives 1.4.2 Privileged R&D expenditures 1.4.3 Tax credit versus allowance 1.4.4 Territorial scope 1.4.5 Anti-avoidance provisions 18 9

1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.1 General overview of R&D input incentives R&D investment deduction - Deduction from the taxable basis (after losses and before the "stock" of excess NID stemming from previous years, i.e. tax years 2012 and before) - Available for investments made in: Patents Fixed assets used in Belgium in the research and development of new products and forward-looking technologies not harming the environment or the purpose of which is to reduce environmental damage as much as possible - Alternative: tax credit 19 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.1 General overview of R&D input incentives Payroll withholding tax exemption - 80% of the payroll tax on salaries of researchers should not be remitted to the Belgian Treasury => Employment cost of a researcher is reduced => No impact for the employee - Accounting treatment: exempted amounts are recorded as a profits of the year => Net benefit for the company = (WHT exemption * (100% - 33,99%)) - Qualifying researchers working in qualifying projects / programs P.M.: exemption of certain regional grants 20 10

1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.2 Privileged R&D expenditures R&D investment deduction / tax credit - New amortizable assets Tangible fixed assets: buildings, equipment, etc. Intangible fixed assets: capitalized R&D expenses, etc. Amortizable assets (under Belgian GAAP) Minimum 3 year depreciation period See also CAS advice, nr. 2012/13 Quid contract R&D? - Exclusively used for professional purposes 21 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.2 Privileged R&D expenditures R&D investment deduction / tax credit - R&D investments need to be environment friendly - Used in an R&D centre Separate branch of activity (cf. article 46 RD BITC) With separate accounts Universality of goods that is able to operate autonomously Assets are only eligible to the extent that they do not exceed the normal limit necessary for the operation of the R&D centre Should also apply to companies as a whole 22 11

1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.3 Tax credit versus allowance R&D tax credit = R&D investment deduction * 33,99% (always!) - Same conditions as for the investment deduction, but irrevocable option - Rationale: guaranteed cash reimbursement - Existing stock of ID of three previous assessment years is converted to R&D tax credit - Not refundable ID can be carried-forward indefinitely to future profitable years, but limitations TC can be carried-forward to future profitable years, but limitations If not deducted for 5 subsequent tax years (including the investment year) reimbursement of the tax credit 23 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.3 Tax credit versus allowance One-shot Spread Patents and R&D R&D 13,5 % of the acquisition value (ID) 20,5 % of the yearly amortization (ID) Tax benefit (TC): 4,59 % Tax benefit (TC): 6,97% Example Acquisition equipment in 2014 Price: 1.000.000 EUR ID: 135.000 EUR Tax benefit: 45.887 EUR Example R&D expenses in 2014 Capitalization of EUR 1.000.000 Depreciation over 3 years: 3 X 333.333 EUR ID: 3 x 68.333 EUR Tax advantage: 3 x 23.226 EUR Tax benefit: 69.678 EUR 24 12

1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.3 Tax credit versus allowance Parameters Tax benefit Discount factor 7% Nominal tax benefit spread R&D ID /tax credit 69.679,50 Total capitalised R&D (EUR) 1.000.000,00 As % of capitalized R&D 6,97% Tax depreciation period 3 NPV tax benefit spread R&D ID/tax credit 65.220,43 Belgian corporate tax rate 33,99% As % of capitalized R&D 6,52% Spread increased R&D investment deduction rate* 20,50% NPV total tax benefit spread R&D ID/tax credit (taken into account spread of P&L cost) 43.468,89 As % of capitalized R&D 4,35% Option 1: Immediately expensed Amounts in EUR Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Capitalised R&D 1.000.000,00 1.000.000,00 Net tax effect 339.900,00 339.900,00 Option 2: Spread R&D investment deduction ("ID") /tax credit Amounts in EUR Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Depreciation on capitalised R&D 333.333,33 333.333,33 333.333,33 1.000.000,00 Tax benefit spread R&D ID/tax credit ** 23.226,50 23.226,50 23.226,50 69.679,50 NPV Tax benefit spread R&D ID/tax credit 23.226,50 21.707,01 20.286,92 65.220,43 Tax benefit cost in P&L *** 113.300,00 113.300,00 113.300,00 339.900,00 NPV Tax benefit cost in P&L 113.300,00 105.887,85 98.960,61 318.148,46 Difference net tax effect Option 1 versus Option 2 (NPV) -203.373,50 127.594,86 119.247,53 43.468,89 * Rate for tax year 2015 ** Tax benefit = Depreciation on capitalised R&D x spread increased R&D investment deduction rate x Belgian corporate tax rate *** Tax benefit = capitalised R&D x Belgian corporate tax rate 25 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.3 Tax credit versus allowance Parameters Tax benefit Discount factor 7% Nominal tax benefit one-shot R&D ID/tax credit 45.886,50 Total capitalised R&D (EUR) 1.000.000,00 As % of capitalized R&D 4,59% Tax depreciation period 3 NPV tax benefit one-shot R&D ID/tax credit 45.886,50 Belgian corporate tax rate 33,99% As % of capitalized R&D 4,59% Spread increased R&D investment deduction rate* 13,50% NPV total tax benefit one-shot R&D ID/tax credit (taken into account spread of P&L cost) 24.134,96 As % of capitalized R&D 2,41% Option 1: Immediately expensed Amounts in EUR Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Capitalised R&D 1.000.000,00 1.000.000,00 Net tax effect 339.900,00 339.900,00 Option 2: One-shot R&D investment deduction/tax credit Amounts in EUR Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Depreciation on capitalised R&D 333.333,33 333.333,33 333.333,33 1.000.000,00 Tax benefit one-shot R&D investment deduction/tax credit** 45.886,50 0,00 0,00 45.886,50 NPV Tax benefit one-shot R&D investment deduction/tax credit 45.886,50 0,00 0,00 45.886,50 Tax benefit cost in P&L *** 113.300,00 113.300,00 113.300,00 339.900,00 NPV Tax benefit cost in P&L 113.300,00 105.887,85 98.960,61 318.148,46 Difference net tax effect Option 1 versus Option 2 (NPV) -180.713,50 105.887,85 98.960,61 24.134,96 * Rate for tax year 2015 ** Tax benefit = Acquisition value (Capitalised R&D) x one-shot increased R&D investment deduction rate x Belgian corporate tax rate 26 *** Tax benefit = capitalised R&D x Belgian corporate tax rate 13

1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.4 Territorial scope R&D investment deduction / tax credit - Used in Belgium (at least partly) - This requirement is likely incompatible with EU law (ECJ Laboratoires Fournier, C-039/04, 10 March 2005) - But new Comm.ITC 68/18 27 1.4 R&D input incentives 1.4.5 Anti-avoidance provisions List of assets that do not qualify R&D tangible and acquired intangible assets (other than patents) to be used during entire depreciation period - If used for another purpose: recapture rule comes into play - Not in case of spread regime - Situation in which assets are sold or put out of use in this case even additional investment deduction or tax credit is possible 28 14

Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 29 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.1 General overview of output incentives 1.5.2 Definition of privileged IP rights 1.5.3 Acquired IP 1.5.4 Pre-existing IP 1.5.5 Development condition 1.5.6 Privileged IP income 1.5.7 Anti-avoidance provisions 1.5.8 Credit for foreign withholding taxes 30 15

1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.1 General overview of output incentives After the NID the PID - Corporate taxpayers, irrespective of their size or industry, are entitled to an 80 per cent deduction of their gross patent income from their taxable base 31 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.2 Definition of privileged IP rights Patents and supplementary protection certificates PID is not restricted to Belgian patents Applies to variable income streams, fixed income streams, as well as upfront fees, milestones, etc. PID is also not restricted to the so-called research centres laboratories The tax deduction is only applicable when a patent is granted by the competent organism 32 16

1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.2 Definition of privileged IP rights For reasons of manageability (the budgetary point of view > BITC) : Patents fully or partly self-developed by Belgian companies (or branches of foreign companies), either in R&D centres in Belgium or abroad, constituting a separate branch of activity of the company Patents acquired by a Belgian company or branch provided they are being further developed in R&D centres in Belgium or abroad, constituting a separate branch of activity of the company Patents licensed to the Belgian company or branch provided they further develop in R&D centres in Belgium or abroad, constituting a separate branch of activity of the company As of January 1st 2013, SME s are not required to fulfil the R &D centre requirement. 33 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.3 Acquired IP PID is not limited to self-developed patents, but also acquired IP - By acquisition or - By licensing The additional condition to benefit from the PID is to further improve the patent. Ratio legis No obligation that this further improvement of the patent should lead to a new patent. 34 17

1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.4 Pre-existing IP PID is applicable starting in the tax year 2008 (income year 2007) To avoid abuse and to limit the scope of the incentive, the tax incentive is only applicable to new income from patents - New means income from patents that have not been used by the Belgian company, a licensee or a related company, for the purpose of the supply of goods or services to third parties before 1 January 2007 35 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.5 Development condition This condition is paraphrased in a different way - For new patents the law mentioned the wording completely or partially developed - For patents that are acquired or licensed to a Belgian company the wording is further improved Improvement = leading to an added value for instance if the value of the patented product or procedure was raised Income from know-how, related to this improvement, should therefore also classify as patent income that can benefit from the PID 36 18

1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.6 Privileged IP income income received by the owner, the usufructuary and the licence holder The BITC gives a definition of the privileged IP income. - Income streams, from whatever nature, for licensees granted by the company on patents insofar the income is included in the Belgian taxable result of the company or branch. Only the income related to the patent can be considered as privileged IP income (f.i. know-how not directly related to the patent can not benefit from PID) - The so-called embedded royalty (what income would have been received from a third party by the company having exploited patents on his own behalf) 37 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.6 Privileged IP income The PID can only be granted for income received during the period that the company has a patent - Before - After Multiple patents Opposition > revocation of the patent > PID is no longer granted Only applicable if the income is taxable in Belgium 38 19

1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.7 Anti-avoidance provisions Anti-abuse provisions apply to acquired patents to avoid - A double deduction of the costs and - A double dip because of successive licences and sublicenses Acquirement - Property, co property, usufruct or a licence agreement The income from these acquired patents must be reduced by - Compensations paid to third parties for obtaining the ownership of the patent and - The amortizations applied to the acquisition value of the patents. The cost related to research and development (activated or not), however, need not to be deducted from the patent income 39 1.5 Output R&D fiscal incentives (patent box or similar incentive) 1.5.8 Credit for foreign withholding taxes If royalties are subject to a foreign withholding tax, Belgium will grant a lump-sum tax credit limited to the foreign tax rate, with a maximum of 15 per cent The foreign tax credit can only be set off against the tax on the patent income and is not refundable 40 20

Part 1: R&D incentives under domestic tax taw 1.6 Procedural requirements 41 1.6 Procedural requirements R&D investment deduction / tax credit - Form to added to the corporate tax return (275U 275W) - Certificate Flemish Region - Defence file Payroll withholding tax exemption - Notification requirement (department of Scientific Policy) - Simplified registration procedure - Possibility to ask for a binding opinion Patent income deduction - Form to added to the corporate tax return (275P) - Defence file 42 21

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 43 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.1 Introduction 44 22

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.1 Introduction Discrimination BITC - The word Belgium is not mentioned, or - It is clearly stipulated Belgian and foreign 45 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.2 Eligible taxpayers and territorial scope of R&D incentives 46 23

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.2 Eligible taxpayers and territorial scope of R&D incentives 2.2.1 Compatibility with the non-discrimination provision of DTCs 2.2.2 Compatibility with EU fundamental freedoms 2.2.3 Compatibility with EU State aid rules 47 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.2 Eligible taxpayers and territorial scope of R&D incentives 2.2.1 Compatibility with the non-discrimination provision of DTCs Belgium extended the benefit of R&D incentives to permanent establishments of foreign companies 48 24

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.2 Eligible taxpayers and territorial scope of R&D incentives 2.2.2 Compatibility with EU fundamental freedoms No limitation of the application of the R&D incentives to the Belgian territory Administrative practice elucidates - Administrative commentary on the deduction for investment where, in this new commentary, is clearly explained that the assets used by a taxpayer must be linked to the professional activity in Belgium, but where it is of no importance in which country, Belgium or abroad, the asset is bought and where it is of no importance whether the asset is effectually used in Belgium or abroad 49 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.2 Eligible taxpayers and territorial scope of R&D incentives 2.2.3 Compatibility with EU State aid rules Policy of the legislator in harmony with the target group However, Young Innovative Companies - Not paying a part of the payroll taxes of the remuneration paid to their scientific personnel - 2006 : Commission approved this support scheme - 2011 : screening by the Commission found that Belgian had not introduced the definitions of the types of research eligible for this break in its legislation - 2013 : EU decision to investigate - 2014 : a formal investigation is taking place 50 25

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.3 Patent box regimes and harmful tax competition 51 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.3 Patent box regimes and harmful tax competition 2.3.1 Under the OECD BEPS Action Plan 1998 OECD Report Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue Action n 5 of the OECD BEPS action plan - Improving transparency - Substantial activity test for preferential regimes (so as to counter purely tax-driven transaction) Quid application to the Belgian patent income deduction? 52 26

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.3 Patent box regimes and harmful tax competition 2.3.2 Under EU State aid rules and the Code of Conduct for business taxation 2.3.2.1 Under the Code of Conduct for business taxation 1998 Code of conduct for business taxation Activity test which seems to be even more stringent Cfr. EU investigation of UK patent box (test requires real and substantial activities in the UK) Is this in line with EU fundamentel freedoms? Quid application to the Belgian patent income deduction? 53 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.3 Patent box regimes and harmful tax competition 2.3.2 Under EU State aid rules and the Code of Conduct for business taxation 2.3.2.2 Under State aid rules Belgian patent income deduction aims at stimulating R&D activities Not selective Should be considered as in line with EU State aid rules 54 27

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.3 Patent box regimes and harmful tax competition 2.3.2 Under EU State aid rules and the Code of Conduct for business taxation 2.3.2.3 Harmful tax competition and fundamental freedoms In order to benefit from Belgian patent income deduction, patent should be developed or improved in an R&D centre, in Belgium or abroad This seems to be in line with EU fundamental freedoms 55 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.4 Intangibles and BEPS situations 56 28

Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.4 Intangibles and BEPS situations 2.4.1 Transfer of intangible to low tax jurisdictions Transfer implies taxation Quid application of article 344 2 BITC? - Company - Branch structure Legitimate transfer to a branch Exit taxation 57 Part 2: R&D incentives in an international context 2.4 Intangibles and BEPS situations 2.4.2 Royalty payments to intermediary IP companies Beneficial ownership concept: - Legal versus economic approach - Belgian position - Tax treaties - EU interest and royalty directive GAAR Sham doctrine 58 29

Thank you! 2014 PricewaterhouseCoopers. All rights reserved. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. 30