Constructing Investor Benchmarks for Responsible Investors

Similar documents
S&P Shariah Indices Dow Jones Islamic Market Indices QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

Review of 2018 S&P GSCI Index Rebalancing

Variable Annuity Volatility Management: An Era of Risk Control

A Case for Dividend Growth Strategies

S&P Target Risk Index Series Methodology

S&P Balanced Equity and Bond Indices Methodology

Indexing Solutions For Retirement

Dow Jones Target Date Indices Methodology

Persistence of Australian Active Funds

Laddering a Portfolio of Municipal Bonds

S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Methodology

Global Property & REIT Quantitative Analysis

Dow Jones Sustainability Europe Diversified Low Volatility High Dividend Index Methodology

S&P MLP Indices Methodology

Mid Cap: A Sweet Spot for Performance

S&P Global Luxury Index Methodology

S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index Methodology

S&P 500 Buyback Index Methodology

S&P 500 Carry Adjusted Total Return Index Methodology

S&P/TSX Venture Composite Methodology

March Construction and Methodology Document. Schwab 1000 Index

Dow Jones Target Date Indices Methodology

S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index Methodology

S&P Global 1200 Methodology

S&P 500 High Beta High Dividend Index Methodology

S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index Methodology

Global ETP Market Landscape

S&P China Convertible Bond Index Methodology

S&P 500 Capex Efficiency Index Methodology

S&P UK / Euro High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Methodology

S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index Methodology

SPIVA Senior Loans Scorecard

S&P All STARS Indices Methodology

S&P/TSX Composite Shareholder Yield Index Methodology

S&P/TSX Composite Buyback Index Methodology

S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Methodology

S&P/IFCI Carbon Efficient Index Methodology

S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index Methodology

S&P Float Adjustment Methodology

S&P Global 1200 Methodology

Dow Jones Composite All REIT Indices Methodology

Dow Jones Global Composite Yield Index Methodology

S&P Target Date Index Series Methodology

Does Past Performance Matter? The Persistence Scorecard

S&P Sri Lanka 20 Methodology

S&P/TSX Canadian Dividend Aristocrats Index Methodology

S&P/TSX Revenue Exposure Indices Methodology

S&P/TSX Venture Composite Methodology

Index Dashboard: S&P Europe 350 Factor Indices

Mexico s Fixed Income Markets

Does Past Performance Matter? The Persistence Scorecard

S&P Dow Jones Indices: S&P/TSX Venture 30 Index Methodology

S&P INDICES VERSUS ACTIVE FUNDS (SPIVA ) SCORECARD

S&P/BM&F Brazil Government Bond Indices Methodology

April 10,

RMBS ARREARS STATISTICS

S&P Equity Futures and Currency Futures Indices Methodology

S&P China A-Share Quality Value Index Methodology

S&P/ASX Bank Bill Index Methodology

Big Things Come in Small Packages: Looking Into the S&P SmallCap 600

S&P Dow Jones Indices: S&P/TSX Preferred Share Laddered Index Methodology

NYSE Collar Index (NYSECL)

The Equal Time Weighted Constant Portfolio Methodology

S&P Environmental & Socially Responsible Indices Methodology

S&P Enhanced Value Indices Methodology

28 ИЮНЯ 2012 Г. 1

S&P/BOVESPA Momentum Index Methodology

S&P/TSX Venture Composite Methodology

PPPs, Contingent Liabilities And Sovereign s Credit Quality

DJSI Diversified Family

ESG Investing: Research & Benchmarks. Thomas Kuh, PhD Executive Director and Global Head of ESG Indexes, MSCI

S&P/TSX Equal Weight Indices Methodology

NYSE Dynamic U.S. Large Cap Buy-Write Index (NYBW)

Sovereign Rating Trends In Central America

S&P/TSX Equal Weight Indices Methodology

NYSE Technology Index (NYTECH)

NYSE Arca Equal Weighted Pharmaceutical Index (DGE)

NYSE Arca North American Telecommunications Index (XTC)

MSCI Prime Value Indexes Methodology

CONSENSUS OPERATING EARNINGS for the S&P 500, MidCap 400 and SmallCap 600 Indices, as well as the Sectors in the S&P /02/18

Mont Blanc Capital Corp. (As Of June 2014)

METHODOLOGY BOOK FOR: - MSCI USA SELECT QUALITY YIELD INDEX - MSCI EMERGING MARKETS SELECT QUALITY YIELD INDEX - MSCI UNITED KINGDOM

Interactive Brokers LLC

S&P BSE AllCap Methodology

NYSE R&D Innovation Index (NYINOV8 / NYINOV8T)

NYSE U.S. Treasury Futures Index Series

A VIX for Canada. October 14, 2010

MSCI SIZE TILT INDEXES METHODOLOGY

NYSE Arca Tech 100 Index TM (PSE)

Asia-Pacific Credit Outlook 2017: Banks and Corporates

Standard & Poor s Presentation Virginia GFOA

MSCI AUSTRALIA SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND YIELD INDEX

MSCI CUSTOM RISK WEIGHTED INDEXES

MSCI VALUE WEIGHTED INDEXES METHODOLOGY

S&P BSE India Infrastructure Methodology

MSCI Diversified Multi-Factor Indexes Methodology

Dow Jones BRIC Indices Methodology

MSCI ALL PAKISTAN SELECT 25/50 INDEX METHODOLOGY

MSCI USA ESG SELECT INDEX METHODOLOGY

S&P/TSX 60 VIX Methodology

Transcription:

Constructing Investor Benchmarks for Responsible Investors JULIA KOCHETYGOVA Senior Director, Product Management RI Asia Conference Tokyo. March 6, 2014 For Financial Professionals. Not for Public Distribution. PROPRIETARY. Permission to reprint or distribute any content from this presentation requires the written approval of S&P Dow Jones Indices.

BENCHMARKING SUSTAINABLE INVESTMENTS HOW BIG IS THE NEED? The investment world is going increasingly passive The percentage of equity funds globally outperformed by established benchmarks varies from 63 to 75 percent depending on the period (S&P Dow Jones Indices, SPIVA. For 1, 3 and 5-year periods ended July 31, 2013) ETFs: 31% growth p.a. in the last 10 years; 56% in 2012 up to $1.7 trillion, more than $2 trillion in 2013 (ICI Factbook; BlackRock ETP report) Index mutual funds in the US were growing by 10% p.a. in the last 5 years, while all mutual funds in the US have been growing by 0.1% p.a. (ICI Factbook 2013) According to the Boston Consulting Group (Global Asset Management 2013: Capitalizing on the Recovery), funds under passive management have increased 25% in the last four years. Asset management companies had $7,900 billion under passive management in 2012, or 13% of assets under management worldwide. It is believed that 50% of the new pension money go passive US Passive Investments, % of total funds assets Source: 2013 Investment Company Factbook issued by Investment Company Institute (ICI). www.icifactbook.org The IMA Annual Survey by Investment Management Association www.investmentuk.org Source: Boston Consulting Group. Solutions include target date, absolute return, global asset allocation, income, volatility, LDI, etc. Alternatives include hedge funds, PE, real estate, infrastructure, and commodities. Active specialties include equity specialties (global, international, emerging markets, small cap, sectors, etc) and fixed income specialties (credit, emerging markets, global, high yield, and convertibles). Active core includes active domestic large cap equity, active government fixed income, money markets, and traditional balanced 2

KEY FEATURES OF TODAY S SUSTAINABILITY BENCHMARKING LANDSCAPE Growing interest, but small amounts. Novethic study 2013: 45% of the investors interviewed using passive management said they applied a responsible investment strategy to this management style. But total amount of passive sustainability investments is just $19 billion (Bloomberg, February 2013) Transparency and Consistency. The only way to apply metrics to sustainability investments; the only systematic instrument of rules-based selecting and weighting stocks Diversity and Complexity. There are 160 sustainability indices according to the 2014 Novethic report. S&P Dow Jones Indices have around 60. The methodologies encompass the sustainability assessment and index construction rules Trade-off between high sustainability profile and low tracking error. Scissors of ESG benchmarking: if highly sustainable profile, then tracking error too high. Too far from the mainstream index 3

TWO GENERATIONS OF SUSTAINABILITY INDICES BY S&P DOW JONES INDICES: DJSI AND DJSI DIVERSIFIED SELECTION PROCESSES 1G Assessed Universe Large and Midcap companies of global S&P BMI Benchmark (Over 2600 developed and emerging market companies) DJSI «Classic» DJSI Diversified 2G Select 10% most sustainable companies per industry (333 components) Select most sustainable 33% Market Cap per country and per GICS sector (664 components) Regional break-down (Developed, Emerging, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific) Regional break-down (Developed, Emerging, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific) Family of market cap weighted benchmark indices Family of score weighted bluechip indices Family of market cap weighted benchmark indices 4

Jan/10 Mar/10 May/10 Jul/10 Sep/10 Nov/10 Jan/11 Mar/11 May/11 Jul/11 Sep/11 Nov/11 Jan/12 Mar/12 May/12 Jul/12 Sep/12 Nov/12 Jan/13 Mar/13 May/13 Jul/13 Sep/13 Nov/13 Jan/14 DJSI WORLD AND DJSI WORLD DIVERSIFIED COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE WITH THE STANDARD BENCHMARK 180% 160% 140% and Diversified versus the Benchmark 2010-2013 Risk/Return Performance Diversified S&P Global LargeMidCap 1Yr Return 12.80% 11.57% 13.13% 1Yr Risk 10.59% 11.64% 10.33% 3Yr Return 7.62% 6.79% 8.12% 3Yr Risk 14.42% 15.92% 14.39% 5Yr Return 15.63% 14.92% 16.74% 5Yr Risk 17.31% 18.81% 17.26% 120% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% S&P Global LargeMidCap Diversified Tracking Error (As of Jan 31, 2014) Diversified 1Yr Tracking Error 1.15% 2.29% 3Yr Tracking Error 1.27% 2.61% 5Yr Tracking Error 1.28% 2.85% Annualized Tracking Error (As of Jan 31, 2014) Diversified 2010 1.65% 2.42% 2011 0.85% 3.87% 2012 1.38% 2.83% 2013 1.35% 2.87% 2014 1.15% 2.29% Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and/or its affiliates. Data as of December 31, 2013. Index performance is based on USD total net return index levels. Charts and graphs are provided for illustrative purposes. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. These charts and graphs may reflect hypothetical historical performance. Please see the Performance Disclosure at the end of this document for more information regarding the inherent limitations associated with back-tested performance. 5

DJSI DIVERSIFIED SUSTAINABILITY PROFILE VERSUS THE BENCHMARK AND DJSI WORLD Comparative CSA Scores for Key Sustainability Criteria Source: RobecoSAM. Data as of November 11, 2013. 6

SUSTAINABILITY INDICES IN THE DJSI PRODUCT RANGE DESIGNED TO MEET VARIOUS INVESTOR NEEDS DJSI DJSI Diversified S&P Global ESG Tilted* Sustainability Approach Best-in-class per sector Best-in-class per country & sector ESG tilt Threshold Top 10% per Industry & top 15 % by float adjusted Market Cap per GICS Industry Group Minimum score threshold of 20; then top 50% of companies in the assessed universe ranked by ESG score & top 33 % by float adjusted Market Cap per RobecoSAM GICS Sector and Country None, all components of benchmark are included Deviation from benchmark Higher tracking error Lower tracking error Moderate tracking error Number of components Variable (333 World) Variable (664 World) Fixed (i.e. 500) Target audience Assessment Corporate rating; pure SRI Investors; active managers Annual web-based questionnaires; supporting docs and media & stakeholder analysis from RepRisk (both company participation as well as assessment based on publicly available information) Conservative risk-averse pension funds interested in sustainability Annual web-based questionnaires; supporting docs and media & stakeholder analysis from RepRisk (both company participation as well as assessment based on publicly available information); scores converted into relative scores for GICS sector and market cap peer groups SRI investors covering broad markets; active managers Annual web-based questionnaires; supporting docs and media & stakeholder analysis from RepRisk (more companies with assessment based on publicly available information); their scores are adjusted on "What's Available" basis); all scores are size-adjusted on the basis of regression Research Provider RobecoSAM RobecoSAM RobecoSAM Weighting Scheme Float adjusted Market Cap Float adjusted Market Cap Benchmark S&P Global LargeMidCap Index S&P Global LargeMidCap Index Weighting based on a combination of Float adjusted Market Cap and ESG score, achieved via re-weighting around the average S&P Global 1200 and subsets, plusl Australia 200, Korea LargeMid Cap *The indices are not yet in existence; the information is being back-tested 7

Appendix 1. HISTORY OF INDICES IN ONE PAGE Sustainability indices begin with DJSI, 1999 New ways to select securities, weight stocks and use derivatives, 2000- Volatility becomes a focus, 2011 Index funds, 1970s Global expansion begins with MSCI, 1970s S&P 500 futures and options, 1982 Emerging market indices, the World Bank, now S&P/IFC indices, 1980s ETFs beginning with the SPDR, 1993 Growth, value, styles, sectors and industries, 1990s S&P 500, 1957 replaced S&P 90 Stock Composite Modern history Recent history Medieval history FT-30, 1935, joined by the FTSE-100 in 1984 Ancient history Standard Statistics Company 90 Stock Composite, 1926 Beginning of history Dow Jones Industrials, 1896 Pre-history PROPRIETARY. PERMISSION TO REPRINT OR DISTRIBUTE ANY CONTENT FROM THIS PRESENTATION REQUIRES THE WRITTEN APPROVAL OF S&P DOW JONES INDICES. 8

PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE The DJSI Diversified Family of Indices was launched on May 30, 2013. All information presented prior to the launch date is back-tested. Backtested performance is not actual performance, but is hypothetical. The back-test calculations are based on the same methodology that was in effect when the index was officially launched. Complete index methodology details are available at www.spdji.com. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. S&P Dow Jones Indices defines various dates to assist our clients in providing transparency on their products. The First Value Date is the first day for which there is a calculated value (either live or back-tested) for a given index. The Base Date is the date at which the Index is set at a fixed value for calculation purposes. The Launch Date designates the date upon which the values of an index are first considered live: index values provided for any date or time period prior to the index s Launch Date are considered back-tested. S&P Dow Jones Indices defines the Launch Date as the date by which the values of an index are known to have been released to the public, for example via the company s public website or its datafeed to external parties. For Dow Jones-branded indicates introduced prior to May 31, 2013, the Launch Date (which prior to May 31, 2013, was termed Date of introduction ) is set at a date upon which no further changes were permitted to be made to the index methodology, but that may have been prior to the Index s public release date. Past performance of the Index is not an indication of future results. Prospective application of the methodology used to construct the Index may not result in performance commensurate with the back-test returns shown. The back-test period does not necessarily correspond to the entire available history of the Index. Please refer to the methodology paper for the Index, available at www.spdji.com for more details about the index, including the manner in which it is rebalanced, the timing of such rebalancing, criteria for additions and deletions, as well as all index calculations. Another limitation of using back-tested information is that the back-tested calculation is generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. Back-tested information reflects the application of the index methodology and selection of index constituents in hindsight. No hypothetical record can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, there are numerous factors related to the equities, fixed income, or commodities markets in general which cannot be, and have not been accounted for in the preparation of the index information set forth, all of which can affect actual performance. The Index returns shown do not represent the results of actual trading of investable assets/securities. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC maintains the Index and calculates the Index levels and performance shown or discussed, but does not manage actual assets. Index returns do not reflect payment of any sales charges or fees an investor may pay to purchase the securities underlying the Index or investment funds that are intended to track the performance of the Index. The imposition of these fees and charges would cause actual and back-tested performance of the securities/fund to be lower than the Index performance shown. As a simple example, if an index returned 10% on a US $100,000 investment for a 12-month period (or US $10,000) and an actual asset-based fee of 1.5% was imposed at the end of the period on the investment plus accrued interest (or US $1,650), the net return would be 8.35% (or US $8,350) for the year. Over a three year period, an annual 1.5% fee taken at year end with an assumed 10% return per year would result in a cumulative gross return of 33.10%, a total fee of US $5,375, and a cumulative net return of 27.2% (or US $27,200). 9

GENERAL DISCLAIMER S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a part of McGraw Hill Financial 2014. All rights reserved. Standard & Poor s and S&P are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor s Financial Services LLC ( S&P ), a part of McGraw Hill Financial. Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC ( Dow Jones ). Trademarks have been licensed to S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. Redistribution, reproduction and/or photocopying in whole or in part are prohibited without written permission. This document does not constitute an offer of services in jurisdictions where S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, Dow Jones, S&P or their respective affiliates (collectively S&P Dow Jones Indices ) do not have the necessary licenses. All information provided by S&P Dow Jones Indices is impersonal and not tailored to the needs of any person, entity or group of persons. S&P Dow Jones Indices receives compensation in connection with licensing its indices to third parties. Past performance of an index is not a guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Exposure to an asset class represented by an index is available through investable instruments based on that index. S&P Dow Jones Indices does not sponsor, endorse, sell, promote or manage any investment fund or other investment vehicle that is offered by third parties and that seeks to provide an investment return based on the performance of any index. S&P Dow Jones Indices makes no assurance that investment products based on the index will accurately track index performance or provide positive investment returns. S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC is not an investment advisor, and S&P Dow Jones Indices makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in any such investment fund or other investment vehicle. A decision to invest in any such investment fund or other investment vehicle should not be made in reliance on any of the statements set forth in this document. Prospective investors are advised to make an investment in any such fund or other vehicle only after carefully considering the risks associated with investing in such funds, as detailed in an offering memorandum or similar document that is prepared by or on behalf of the issuer of the investment fund or other vehicle. Inclusion of a security within an index is not a recommendation by S&P Dow Jones Indices to buy, sell, or hold such security, nor is it considered to be investment advice. These materials have been prepared solely for informational purposes based upon information generally available to the public and from sources believed to be reliable. No content contained in these materials (including index data, ratings, credit-related analyses and data, research, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse-engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P Dow Jones Indices. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P Dow Jones Indices and its third-party data providers and licensors (collectively S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties ) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED ON AN AS IS BASIS. S&P DOW JONES INDICES PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Dow Jones Indices Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. S&P Dow Jones Indices keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P Dow Jones Indices may have information that is not available to other business units. S&P Dow Jones Indices has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. In addition, S&P Dow Jones Indices provides a wide range of services to, or relating to, many organizations, including issuers of securities, investment advisers, brokerdealers, investment banks, other financial institutions and financial intermediaries, and accordingly may receive fees or other economic benefits from those organizations, including organizations whose securities or services they may recommend, rate, include in model portfolios, evaluate or otherwise address. 10

THANK YOU Julia Kochetygova Senior Director, Product Management Julia.kochetygova@spdji.com 11