Volcker Rule: Hedging, Market Making and Regulatory Oversight January 14, 2014 Presented By Julian E. Hammar

Similar documents
The Volcker Rule and Capital Markets Offerings

Summary of Final Volcker Rule Regulation Proprietary Trading

A User s Guide to The Volcker Rule February 2014

CFTC Reporting and Recordkeeping Obligations: What General Counsels Need to Know AGA Legal Forum 2014 July 14, 2014 Presented By Julian E.

Proposed Regulations Implementing the Volcker Rule

Client Alert July 3, 2014

Impact of Volcker Rule on Foreign Banking Organizations

Volcker Rule: An Initial Look at Significant Changes

Volcker: The Final Rule

Federal Banking Agencies Issue Recommendations as Part of Their Section 620 Report to Solidify the Safety and Soundness of the U.S.

The Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Securitization Investors and Sponsors

The Federal Reserve Board s Final Dodd-Frank Systemic Prudential Regulations for Domestic Banks

Understanding the Requirements and Impact of the Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. February 11, 2014

Bubble, Bubble Toil and Trouble:

Volcker Rule: The Final Rule

Separation Anxiety: Structural Reform of EU Credit Institutions

The Volcker Rule. Charles M. Horn Christopher Laursen Matthew Richardson Dwight Smith. July 7, 2011 DC

MMI Legal & Compliance Webinar: The Volcker Rule and the Final Regulations. January 15, Charles M. Horn Julie A. Marcacci

Table of Contents. August 2010 Arnold & Porter LLP

A Lexis Practice Advisor Practice Note by Eric S. Yoon, Partner at K&L Gates LLP

The Volcker Rule: Impact of the Final Rule on Banking Institutions

A Fiduciary Duty for Broker-Dealers?

Direct and Significant Connections: CFTC Provides Guidance on Extraterritoriality

The Dodd-Frank Act implementation of the Volcker Rule

The Volcker Rule as Proposed: Questions For Comment Nos and SEC Questions Nos October 11, 2011

Federal Agencies Approve Final Volcker Rule

CFTC Approves Supplemental Proposal on Position Limits to Permit Exchanges to Recognize Non-Enumerated Bona Fide Hedges

JANUARY 26, 2012 JANUARY 30, Contact. Treatment of bridge financing under the Volcker rule. Proprietary trading restrictions in the Volcker rule

Practical guidance at Lexis Practice Advisor

The Treasury Report s Recommendations for Derivatives Regulation

Proposed Amendments to the Volcker Rule Regulations June 18, 2018

Proposed Revisions to the Volcker Rule s Implementing Rules Select Proposals and Open Questions

Enforcement and Compliance Priorities and Developments: SEC, FINRA, CFTC and CFPB

October 17, Brent J. Fields, Secretary Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC File No.

CFTC s and U.S. Prudential Regulators Margin and Segregation Rules for Uncleared Swaps Definition of Financial End User

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

Comment Letter on the Proprietary Trading Portion of Study

Implications of the DOL Fiduciary Rule for Structured Products

What should be of interest in Dodd-Frank to non-u.s. banks wanting to do business in the United States?

Private Offerings: Questions that Might Frequently be Asked Sometime Soon

Dodd-Frank Title VII: Reforms for the Swaps Marketplace

TLAC, and Then Some. A Preliminary Assessment of the Federal Reserve Board s NPR

The Volcker Rule: A Redline Comparison of the Final Rule Against the Proposal

SEC Staff Issues New C&DIs Related to Foreign Issuers

Fraud, Manipulation and Deception: CFTC/SEC Proposed Rules

A View From the Street

News Bulletin June 28, 2012

U.S. Banking Law and the FBO What You Need to Know

Proposed Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps Under Dodd-Frank

13 February 2012 USA.

OCIE to Target Adviser Payments for Fund Distribution, Funds with Alternative Strategies and New Advisers

INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL BANKERS IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DODD-FRANK ACT KEY ISSUES FOR INTERNATIONAL BANKS

September 7, The Honorable Spencer Bachus Chairman, House Financial Services Committee U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C.

FINRA Notice Regarding Complex Products

Volcker Rule Materials Proprietary Trading. February 13, Comment Letter. SIFMA AMG Proposed Rule. # v1

THE SECURITIES AND CAPITAL MARKETS IMPLICATIONS OF THE REFORM OF THE U.S. FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY

New PROP Trading Act Would Expand Volcker Prohibitions

FINRA S Proposed Rules 2210 and 2211

President Signs Dodd-Frank Reform Legislation

Client Update CFTC Adopts Margin Rules for Non-Cleared Swaps

The Effects of the Dodd-Frank Act on Foreign Banks: Where We Are in 2013

Re: Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests In, and Relationships With, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds

Volcker Rule: Past the Compliance Date, but Not Over the Hump

ADVISORY Dodd-Frank Act

Client Update Volcker Rule: Temporary Relief for Foreign Excluded Funds

BLX Group LLC. 777 S. Figueroa St., Suite Los Angeles, California CRD Number

MEMORANDUM December 13, 2018 Page 1 of 9

October 17, By Electronic Submission

Securities Developments Medley Session One

SEC Adopts New FINRA Rule Governing Communications with the Public

Business Development Companies

Comments on Volcker Rule Proposed Regulations

Considerations for End-Users January 2014

Private Secondary Markets and Rule 15c2-11

Comments on Notice Seeking Public Input on the Volcker Rule issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

Bank Regulatory Practice

The Volcker Rule contained in the Dodd-Frank

CFTC and SEC Issue Final Swap-Related Rules Under Title VII of Dodd-Frank

Dodd-Frank Act Section PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES. [As amended by Omnibus Spending Bill]

Interest Rate Risk Management Refresher. April 29, Presented to: Howard Sakin Section I. Basics of Interest Rate Hedging?

The Volcker Rule: Proprietary Trading and Private Fund Restrictions

Domestic Systemically Important Banks: New Framework Published

Practice Pointers on EU Market Abuse Regulation: Requirements for U.S. Issuers

Regulatory Implementation Slides

Status of US Financial Reform Legislation: Protection and Investment Advisers. Alan Avery April 6, 2010

Following the Wisdom of the Crowd?

The de minimis exception to designation as a Swap Dealer should be available to regional banks and dealers that intermediate regional Swap markets.

A DODD-FRANK UPDATE CAROL BEAUMIER MANAGING DIRECTOR, PROTIVITI TIM LONG MANAGING DIRECTOR, PROTIVITI

E-ALERT Dodd-Frank Act

Derivatives Regulation Update: Latest Developments and What to Expect in 2016

Final Rules & Studies (by DFA Section) April 30, 2012

SANTANDER INVESTMENT SECURITIES INC.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Treasury Report, Part II: Regulation of the Capital Markets

Volcker Rule Action Plan and Model Board Documents: The Conformance and Compliance Effort Begins

MERRILL LYNCH PROFESSIONAL CLEARING CORP. (S.E.C. I.D. No ) BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 27, 2008 (UNAUDITED) * * * * * * *

Dodd-Frank Reform. January 01, 2017

The Volcker Rule s impact on infrastructure

Volcker Rule Federal Register Version January 31, 2014

SEC PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS OF SWAPS ENTITIES.

Transcription:

2014 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved mofo.com Volcker Rule: Hedging, Market Making and Regulatory Oversight January 14, 2014 Presented By Julian E. Hammar

Background On December 10, 2013, the five relevant U.S. regulatory agencies (Federal Reserve Board (FRB), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) approved the final version of the Volcker Rule. Very detailed release of almost 900 pages. The rule, promulgated pursuant to section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), will substantially limit the circumstances in which many banking entities may enter into derivatives. Because of prohibitions of trading activities of banking entities, the rule could substantially reduce market liquidity. 2

Overview The Volcker Rule applies to a very broad range of banking entities, including insured depository institutions, companies controlling an insured depository institution, foreign banking organizations with U.S. operations, and any affiliate or subsidiary of any of the foregoing. Two primary parts: 1) Prohibition on proprietary trading and 2) Prohibition on ownership interests in, or sponsorship of, certain investment companies and commodity pools, known as covered funds. This presentation will focus on: proprietary trading, permitted risk-mitigating hedging, permitted market making, and regulatory oversight under the Volcker Rule. 3

Proprietary Trading Prohibition: The Volcker Rule generally provides that a banking entity may not engage in proprietary trading engaging as principal for its own trading account in a purchase or sale of one or more financial instruments, including derivatives. Definition of trading account includes, among other things: any account used by a banking entity to purchase or sell financial instruments for short-term resales, price movements or arbitrage profits and any account of a banking entity that is a dealer, swap dealer or security-based swap dealer in connection with its dealing. Definition of financial instrument includes most derivatives (e.g., futures, swaps and options) as well as nonfinancial forwards. Rebuttable Presumption: Rebuttable presumption that if a banking entity holds a financial instrument for less than 60 days, the purchase or sale of such instrument is for the banking entity s trading account. 4

Proprietary Trading Exclusions The following are excluded from proprietary trading: Repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements; Securities borrowed pursuant to a written securities lending agreement meeting certain conditions; Positions for liquidity management purposes; Certain positions held by derivatives clearing organizations or clearing agencies; Excluded clearing related activities by clearing house members; Satisfying an existing delivery obligation or an obligation in connection with a judicial, administrative, self regulatory organization or arbitration proceeding; Transactions when acting solely as an agent, broker or custodian; Deferred compensation plans; and Collecting a debt previously contracted. 5

Permitted Proprietary Trading The prohibition on proprietary trading does not apply to: Certain risk-mitigating hedging activities. Certain market-making activities (as well as certain underwriting activities). Trading in certain instruments: U.S. government or government agency securities; municipal bonds; and for U.S. affiliates of foreign banking entities or foreign affiliates of U.S. banking entities, certain foreign sovereign debt obligations. Trading in certain capacities: On behalf of customers as fiduciary or riskless principal. Banking entities that are regulated insurance companies acting for their general or separate insurance account. Trading by Foreign Banking Organizations solely outside the U.S. 6

Risk-Mitigating Hedging Activities Specific Risks: Exemption from proprietary trading prohibition extends to risk-mitigating hedging activities designed to reduce specific risks of the banking entity. Portfolio Hedging: Although portfolio hedging is not expressly allowed, a banking entity may engage in hedging activities that are in connection with and related to individual or aggregated positions, contracts or other holdings (emphasis added). Hedges of General Risks Not Permitted: Permitted hedging activity does not extend to hedging of general risks that are not related to specific positions, such as risks associated with assets or liabilities of the banking entity generally or risks associated with general market movements or broad economic conditions. 7

Conditions Risk-mitigating hedging activities of banking entities in order to be permitted must be conducted under the following conditions: Establishment of a compliance program; Risk-mitigating hedging activity must meet certain requirements; Certain restrictions on compensation arrangements; and Enhanced documentation in certain circumstances. 8

Compliance Program Requirements: The internal compliance program must be reasonably designed to ensure the banking entity s compliance with the exception for risk-mitigating hedging, including: Policies: Written policies and procedures regarding the positions, techniques and strategies that may be used for hedging, including: Documentation indicating what positions, contracts or other holdings a particular trading desk * may use and Position and aging limits; Controls: Internal controls and ongoing monitoring, management and authorization procedures (including escalation procedures) and *A trading desk is defined as the smallest discrete unit of organization of a banking entity that purchases or sells financial instruments for the trading account of the banking entity or an affiliate thereof. 9

Compliance Program (cont d.) Analysis: Analysis (including correlation analysis) and independent testing designed to ensure that the positions, techniques and strategies that may be used for hedging may reasonably be expected to demonstrably reduce or otherwise significantly mitigate the specific, identifiable risks being hedged. Extent: Extent of the required compliance program will depend upon the size and activities of the banking entity, but for entities engaging in proprietary trading with consolidated assets of $10 billion or more it will be quite substantial. Enhanced Compliance: Those entities with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more have enhanced minimum standards for compliance programs noted in Appendix B to the rule. 10

Requirements for Hedging Risk-mitigating hedging activity must meet the following requirements to be exempt from the proprietary trading prohibition: Policies: Hedging activity must be conducted in accordance with written polices, procedures and internal controls adopted under the compliance program; Reduce or Significantly Mitigate Risk: Hedging activity must be designed to reduce or otherwise significantly mitigate and demonstrably reduces or otherwise significantly mitigates one or more specific, identifiable risks arising in connection with identified positions, contracts, or other holdings, at the inception of hedging activity and on an ongoing basis (including any adjustments); 11

Requirements for Hedging (cont d.) No New or Additional Risk: Hedging activity must not give rise, at the inception of the hedge, to any significant new or additional risk that is not itself hedged contemporaneously; and Ongoing Review and Recalibration: Hedging activity is subject to continuing review, monitoring and management consistent with the required policies and ongoing recalibration of the hedging activity. 12

Anticipatory and Dynamic Hedging Anticipatory hedging: Anticipatory hedging (hedging before the banking entity becomes exposed to the underlying risk) is permitted so long as it meets the above requirements for hedging. Unlike under the proposed rule, the anticipatory hedge does not have to be established slightly before the banking entity becomes exposed to the underlying risk. But if the risk does not materialize, the hedge must be extinguished as soon as reasonably practicable. Dynamic hedging: Dynamic hedging (a series of hedging transactions designed to rebalance hedging positions based on changes resulting from permissible activities or from a change in the price or other characteristic of the positions(s) being hedged) likewise is permitted if it meets the above requirements for hedging. 13

Compensation Requirement: Compensation arrangements of persons performing risk-mitigating hedging activities are designed not to reward or incentivize prohibited proprietary trading. Applicability to other permitted activities: Similar requirement applies to permitted market-making and underwriting activities. 14

Enhanced Documentation For certain types of hedging activities, the banking entity must comply with enhanced documentation requirements. These hedging activities are the following: Cross-desk and Cross-Affiliate Hedging: Hedging activities not established by the specific trading desk responsible for the underlying positions being hedged; Hedging strategies not identified in polices and procedures: Hedging activities that are effected through a financial instrument, exposure, technique or strategy not specifically identified in applicable polices and procedures; and Aggregated Hedging: Hedging activities established to hedge aggregated positions across two or more trading desks. 15

Documentation Requirements Content: A banking entity contemporaneously with the establishment of the specified hedges must document: The specific, identifiable risk(s) designed to be reduced; The specific risk-mitigating strategy the purchase or sale is designed to fulfill; and The trading desk or other business unit that is establishing and responsible for the hedge. Recordkeeping: A banking entity must create and retain records meeting these requirements for a period that is no less than five years in a form that allows the banking entity to promptly produce such records to its regulator upon request. 16

Market Making Activities The prohibition on proprietary trading does not apply to a banking entity s market-making activities that meet the following requirements: The trading desk that establishes and manages the financial exposure: routinely stands ready to purchase and sell one or more types of financial instruments related to its financial exposure and is willing and available to quote, purchase and sell, or otherwise enter into long and short positions in those types of financial instruments for its own account in commercially reasonable amounts and throughout market cycles; and The amount, types, and risks of the financial instruments in the trading desk s market-maker inventory are designed not to exceed, on an ongoing basis, the reasonably expected near term demands of clients, customers, or counterparties. 17

Market Making Compliance Program A banking entity must have a compliance program (extent, as with hedging, dependent upon its consolidated assets) for market making that includes written policies and procedures, internal controls, analysis and independent testing addressing: Instruments in which each trading desk will make a market; Actions the trading desk will take to demonstrably reduce or otherwise significantly mitigate promptly the risks of its financial exposure; Limits for each trading desk, based on the nature and amount of the trading desk s market making-related activities; Internal controls and ongoing monitoring and analysis of each trading desk s compliance with its limits; and Authorization procedures, including escalation procedures, that require review and approval of any trade that would exceed a trading desk s limit(s). 18

Other Requirements Compensation: Compensation arrangements of persons performing market-making activities, as with hedging activities, are designed not to reward or incentivize prohibited proprietary trading. Final Rule abandons a provision in the Proposed Rule that the activities of the trading desk, in order to be considered permitted market making, must be designed to generate revenues primarily from fees, commissions, bid/ask spreads or other income rather than the appreciation in value of covered financial positions or hedging of such positions. Registration: Banking entity must be appropriately registered as a dealer, or exempt from registration or excluded from regulation as a dealer, under applicable securities or commodities laws. 19

Hedging Market Making Activities Hedging: Hedging in conjunction with market making activities (but not underwriting) is not subject to the hedging exemption requirements, but: Hedge must still demonstrably reduce or otherwise significantly mitigate one or more specific risks; Trading desk that is engaged in market making must also conduct or direct the hedge hedges done by another trading desk are subject to the hedging exemption rule; and Written policies and procedures addressing permissible hedging techniques and strategies for market making must specify how the trading desk may establish hedges, how such hedges are removed once the risk they are mitigating is unwound and the extent to which the trading desk will engage in anticipatory hedging. 20

Prudential Backstops Permitted proprietary trading activities are not permissible under the Volcker Rule if: They would involve or result in a material conflict of interest between the banking entity and its clients, customers or counterparties; They would result in a material exposure by the banking entity to a high-risk asset or a high-risk trading strategy; or They would pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the banking entity or to the financial stability of the United States. 21

Regulatory Oversight Section 619(b)(2)(B) of Dodd-Frank provides that the regulations required to be adopted shall be issued by: The appropriate Federal banking agencies, jointly, with respect to insured depository institutions; The FRB with respect to companies that control insured depository institutions, foreign banking organizations and nonbank financial companies supervised by the FRB; and The CFTC and SEC with respect to any entity for which the CFTC or the SEC, respectively, is the primary financial regulatory agency as defined in section 2 of Dodd-Frank. CFTC is the primary financial regulatory agency with respect to, among others, futures commission merchants (FCMs) and swap dealers, but only with respect to their activities requiring FCM or swap dealer registration, respectively. 22

Who regulates? Who is the banking entity s regulator? CFTC Chairman Gensler noted in his statement of support for the Volcker Rule that the CFTC is the primary financial regulatory agency with respect to 110 swap dealers and FCMs, which include banking entities that are insured depository institutions as well as broker dealers registered with the SEC (for which the SEC is the primary financial regulatory agency for broker dealer activities). Comptroller of the Currency Curry stated that most banks subject to the rule are large national banks supervised by the OCC and we will take the lead role in developing the supervisory plans. Resource constraints at the CFTC likely will mean that the banking agencies and the SEC will have a greater role in ongoing supervision. Section 619(b)(2)(C) requires consistent application and implementation by the agencies of the Volcker rule. 23

Contact Julian E. Hammar Of Counsel Morrison & Foerster LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 6000 Washington, DC 20006-1888 (202) 887-1679 jhammar@mofo.com 24

About Morrison & Foerster We are Morrison & Foerster a global firm of exceptional credentials. Our clients include some of the largest financial institutions, investment banks, Fortune 100, technology and life sciences companies. We ve been included on The American Lawyer s A-List for 10 straight years, and Fortune named us one of the 100 Best Companies to Work For. Our lawyers are committed to achieving innovative and business-minded results for our clients, while preserving the differences that make us stronger. This is MoFo. Visit us at www.mofo.com. 2013 Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved. For more updates, follow Thinkingcapmarkets, our Twitter feed: www.twitter.com/thinkingcapmkts. Because of the generality of this presentation, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. 25