CITY OF FORT COLLINS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, Prepared by:

Similar documents
Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2012 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation General Employees Retirement System

Re: Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Bloomington Fire Department Relief Association Pension Fund

Metropolitan Transit Authority Union Pension Plan

The City of Omaha Police & Fire Retirement System

State of Oklahoma Public Employees Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2007

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan

El Paso County Retirement Plan

Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association. ACTUARIAL VALUATION June 30, 2003

Employees' Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth Revised Actuarial Valuation and Review as of January 1, 2014

CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM

City of Winter Springs Defined Benefit Plan Actuarial Valuation

ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF TOWN OF DAVIE POLICE PENSION PLAN AS OF OCTOBER 1, February, 2014

CITY OF DEARBORN CHAPTER 22 RETIREMENT SYSTEM

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

City of Gainesville Consolidated Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement Plan

ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, City of Plantation Police Officers Retirement System

November Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota General Employees Retirement Plan St. Paul, Minnesota

TOWN OF LANTANA POLICE RELIEF AND PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2008

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUST STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 6

Municipal Fire & Police Retirement System of Iowa

Dear Trustees of the Local Government Correctional Service Retirement Plan:

Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore

June 5, Mr. Douglas B. Stansil Finance Director Racine County 730 Wisconsin Avenue Racine, WI 53403

November Minnesota State Retirement System State Patrol Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

S T A T E P O L I C E R E T I R E M E N T B E N E F I T S T R U S T S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R

CITY OF HOLLYWOOD GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2012

CITY OF PINELLAS PARK FIREFIGHTERS PENSION FUND ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

RETIREMENT PLAN FOR T H E E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T FUND OF THE CITY OF D A L L A S ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF D E C E M B E R

MINNESOTA STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND

TOWN OF MEDLEY DEFINED BENEFIT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2017

DOC:V00555GL.DOC THE STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ACTUARY PREPARED AS OF JULY 1, 2005

Actuarial Valuation Report for the Employees Retirement System of the City of Baltimore

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

CONTENTS. 1-2 Summary of Benefit Provisions 3 Asset Information 4-6 Retired Life Data Active Member Data Inactive Vested Member Data

City of El Paso, Texas El Paso Firemen s Pension Fund

THE ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY DETENTION OFFICERS AND DEPUTY SHERIFFS RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2015

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUST STATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T AS OF J U N E 3 0, 201 5

REPORT ON THE JANUARY 1, 2012 ACTUARIAL VALUATION OF THE BELMONT CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT SYSTEM

NORTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD PENSION FUND Report on the Actuarial Valuation Prepared as of December 31, 2012

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A

Actuarial Valuation Report

Anne Arundel County Fire Service Retirement Plan

General Employees Retirement Plan

KPERS Death and Disability Benefit Program. Annual Report and GASB 43 Actuarial Valuation As of June 30, 2014

Anne Arundel County Employees Retirement Plan

As you are aware, a copy of the Report should be filed with the State at the following address upon approval by the Board.

F I R E A N D P O L I C E P E N S I O N A S S O C I A T I O N

Report on the Annual Valuation of the Public Employees Retirement System of Mississippi

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Plan

City of Ann Arbor Employees' Retirement System. Actuarial Valuation and Report June 30, 2018

The Town of Middletown Pension Plan

SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN. ACTUARIAL VALUATION as of October 1, 2015

December 4, Minnesota State Retirement System Legislators Retirement Fund St. Paul, Minnesota. Dear Board of Directors:

City of Cranston Fire and Police Department Pension Plans

January 31, Retirement Board 40 Fountain Street, First Floor Providence, RI Dear Members of the Board:

March 18, Teachers Retirement Board California State Teachers Retirement System

Actuary s Certification Letter (Pension Trust Fund)

STATE POLICE RETIREMENT BENEFITS TRUSTSTATE OF RHODE ISLAND ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2017

P H O E N I X P O L I C E D E P T. ( 022) A R I Z O N A P U B L I C S A F E T Y P E R S O N N E L R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M JUNE 30, 201 3

New Mexico Judicial Retirement Fund

State Retirement and Pension System of Maryland Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2004

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

GASB 67/68 Accounting Valuation Report. Town of Medley Defined Benefit Plan

M U N I C I P A L E M P L O Y E E S A N N U I T Y A N D B E N E F I T F U N D O F C H I C A G O ACTUARIAL VALUATION R E P O R T F O R T H E Y E A R

1-3 Retiree Premium Rate Development. Active Members by Attained Age and Years of Service Retired Members by Attained Age Asset Information

City of Brockton Contributory Retirement System

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve

Firemen s Retirement System of St. Louis. Annual Actuarial Valuation as of October 1, 2017

CITY OF ALLEN PARK EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM

ST. PAUL TEACHERS RETIREMENT FUND ASSOCIATION A CTUARIAL V ALUATION

State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio Actuarial Valuation and Review as of July 1, 2017

CITY OF HOMESTEAD POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2015

Minnesota State Retirement System. State Patrol Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2017

Kent County Levy Court. Actuarial Valuation of the Pension Plan of Kent County, Delaware As of January 1, February 16, 2011

CITY OF MOUNT DORA GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2014

Actuarial Section. Actuarial Section THE BOTTOM LINE. The average MSEP retirement benefit is $15,609 per year.

GASB 45 Actuarial Valuation of Postemployment Benefits Other than Pensions for TriMet. As of January 1, Prepared by:

Conduent Human Resource Services Retirement Consulting. The Police and Firemen s Retirement System of New Jersey

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT (DART) EMPLOYEES DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Actuarial Valuation and Review as of June 30, 2009

P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T A S S O C I A T I O N O F M I N N E S O T A L O C A L G O V E R N M E N T C O R R E C T I O N A L S

New Mexico Judicial Retirement Fund

C I T Y O F S T. C L A I R S H O R E S E M P L O Y E E S R E T I R E M E N T S Y S T E M 6 4 T H A C T U A R I A L V A L U A T I O N R E P O R T A S

Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico (PERA)

City of Clearwater Employees Pension Plan Actuarial Valuation Report as of January 1, 2018 Annual Employer Contribution for the Fiscal Year Ending

February 27, The purpose of the annual actuarial valuation of the City of Auburn Hills Employee Pension Plan as of December 31, 2014, is to:

Chicago Transit Authority Supplemental Retirement Plan And Retirement Plan for Board Members. Actuarial Valuation As of January 1, 2003

ORLANDO UTILITIES COMMISSION PENSION PLAN ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2016

Report on the Annual Basic Benefits Valuation of the School Employees Retirement System of Ohio

June 7, Dear Board Members:

The City of Cranston Fire and Police Department Pension Plans. Actuarial Valuation Report as of July 1, 2016

Cavanaugh Macdonald. The experience and dedication you deserve. Assumption Previous Current. a select & ultimate rate of 2.25% and 2.

Police Officers Retirement Fund

Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund ACTUARIAL VALUATION REPORT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2017

VILLAGE OF CARPENTERSVILLE CARPENTERSVILLE POLICE PENSION FUND. Actuarial Valuation Report. For the Year. Beginning January 1, 2016

Police Employees Retirement Plan

Transcription:

ACTUARIAL VALUATION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Prepared by: Patricia Ann Kahle, F.S.A., E.A. Principal and Consulting Actuary and Joel E. Stewart, E.A. Associate Actuary May 2005

1099 Eighteenth Street, Suite 3100 Denver, CO 80202-1931 Tel 303.299.9400 Fax 303.299.9018 www.milliman.com May 13, 2005 Retirement Committee Members City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, Colorado 80522-0580 Dear Retirement Committee Members: As requested, we have made an actuarial valuation of the City of Fort Collins General Employees Retirement Plan as of January 1, 2005. The major findings of the valuation are contained in this report. In preparing this report, Milliman relied on information supplied by employees of the City of Fort Collins that provide administrative support for the Plan. Milliman has accepted the information without audit. This information includes, but is not limited to, statutory provisions, employee data, and financial information. In our examination of these data, we have found them to be reasonably consistent and comparable with data used for other purposes. It should be noted that if any data or other information is inaccurate or incomplete, our calculations may need to be revised. On the basis of the foregoing, we hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this report is complete and accurate and has been prepared in accordance with generally recognized and accepted actuarial principles and practices which are consistent with the principles prescribed by the Actuarial Standards Board (ASB) and the Code of Professional Conduct and Qualification Standards for Public Statements of Actuarial Opinion of the American Academy of Actuaries. We further certify that all costs, liabilities, rates of interest, and other factors for the Plan have been determined on the basis of actuarial assumptions and methods which are individually reasonable (taking into account the experience of the Plan and reasonable expectations); and which, in combination, offer our best estimate of anticipated experience affecting the Plan. Nevertheless, the emerging costs will vary from those presented in this report to the extent that actual experience differs from that projected by the actuarial assumptions. The Retirement Committee has the final decision regarding the appropriateness of the assumptions displayed in Appendix A, and has adopted them. Actuarial computations presented in this report are for purposes of determining the recommended funding amounts for the Plan. Actuarial computations under GASB Statements No. 25 and 27 are for purposes of fulfilling financial accounting requirements. The computations prepared for these two purposes may differ as disclosed in our report. The calculations in the enclosed report have been made on a basis consistent with our understanding of the Plan s funding requirements and goals, and of GASB Statements No. 25 and 27. Determinations for purposes other than meeting these requirements may be j:docs:cfc:05val pdf.doc

Retirement Committee Members May 13, 2005 Page 2 significantly different from the results contained in this report. Accordingly, additional determinations may be needed for other purposes. I, Patricia Ann Kahle, am a member of the American Academy of Actuaries and a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries, and meet the Qualification Standards of the American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained herein. We respectfully submit the following report, and we look forward to discussing it with you. Sincerely, Patricia Ann Kahle, F.S.A., E.A. Principal and Consulting Actuary PAK:js j:docs:cfc:05val pdf.doc

JANUARY 1, 2005 ACTUARIAL VALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS... 1 2 SCOPE OF THE REPORT... 5 3 PARTICIPANT DATA... 6 Table 1 Reconciliation of Participants... 7 Table 2 Summary of Active Participants... 8 Table 3 Summary of Deferred Vested Participants... 10 Table 4 Summary of Retirees, Disableds, and Beneficiaries... 11 Table 5 Number of Pensioners and Annual Pension Amount as of the End of the Each Year... 12 Table 6 Schedule of Members Eligible for Normal or Delayed Retirement in the Next Five Years... 13 4 FINANCIAL DATA... 15 Table 7 Statement of Market Value of Assets...16 Table 8 Change in Market Value of Assets...17 Table 9 Development of Actuarial Value of Assets...18 5 DEVELOPMENT OF ANNUAL REQUIRED CONTRIBUTION... 19 Table 10 Development of Annual Required Contribution... 20 6 GASB NO. 25 DISCLOSURE INFORMATION... 21 Table 11 Development of Net Pension Obligation and Annual Pension Cost... 22 Table 12 Schedule of Employer Contributions, Three-Year Trend Information and Schedule of Funding Progress... 23 Table 13 Notes to Required Supplementary Information... 24 7 HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS... 25 Table 14 Historical Statistics... 26 Table 15 Twenty-Year Projection of Benefit Payments... 27 APPENDICES A ACTUARIAL PROCEDURES AND ASSUMPTIONS... 28 B PLAN SUMMARY... 31 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005)

SECTION 1 SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS This is a report of our actuarial valuation of the Plan as of January 1, 2005. The purpose and findings of our valuation are as follows: 1. Determine the Plan s funding status. The following table summarizes some of the key results of our valuation of the Plan, along with the comparable figures from the prior year valuation. January 1, 2004 January 1, 2005 Market Value of Assets (MV) $ 34,107,332 $ 36,661,730 Actuarial Value of Assets (AV) 36,208,321 36,628,565 Ratio of AV to MV 106.2% 99.9% Discount Rate for Liabilities 7.50% 7.50% Present Value of Future Benefits $ 44,235,876 $ 46,404,475 Actuarial Value of Assets (AV) 36,208,321 36,628,565 Present Value of Future Normal Costs $ 8,027,555 $ 9,775,910 Annual Required Contribution at Beginning of Year 1,107,920 1,397,352 as a Percent of Compensation* 6.35% 8.44% Present Value of Accrued Benefits $ 31,432,207 $ 34,060,670 Funded Percentage (as Percent of MV) 108.5% 107.6% GASB 25 & 27 Information Net Pension Obligation $ (1,061,902) $ (959,840) Annual Pension Cost $ 1,182,408 $ 1,476,355 * See page 4 for a detailed analysis of the rate change. One way to look at the adequacy of plan funding is to compare the value of benefits under the plan terms to the value of plan assets as of the valuation date. By this measure, the plan is fairly well funded, since the actuarial value of plan assets covers 78.9% of the present value of future benefits, and the market value of plan assets covers 79.0% of the present value of future benefits. The present value of future benefits includes benefits earned to date plus the value of benefits anticipated to be earned for all expected future service by current participants. The market value of plan assets exceeds the present value of accumulated plan benefits by 7.5%. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 1

2. Analyze recent plan experience and select appropriate actuarial assumptions. To value the Plan, the actuary must predict future events such as investment return, mortality, and rates of termination by means of actuarial assumptions. The validity of our valuation depends on how closely future Plan experience follows our assumptions. Experience different from that assumed gives rise to actuarial gains or losses, which affect future costs. The actuarial assumptions we used in this valuation are stated in Appendix A. The following comments address some of the more important assumptions. a. Rate of investment return The actuarial valuation was prepared assuming a 7.5% investment return. A study of actual investment performance on the market value of assets produced the following results: Annual Rate of Investment Return For One-Year Period Ending December 31 Annual Rate Period For Period Ending December 31, 2004 Average Annual Rate 2004 9.5% 1 year 9.5% 2003 18.8 2 years 14.1 2002 (9.3) 3 years 5.7 2001 (4.0) 4 years 3.2 2000 (3.5) 5 years 1.8 1999 21.1 6 years 4.8 1998 8.8 7 years 5.3 1997 10.5 8 years 6.0 1996 10.1 9 years 6.4 1995 13.8 10 years 7.1 1994 (0.2) 11 years 6.5 1993 7.1 12 years 6.5 * Rates of return for 1999 and earlier as reported by the prior actuary and used without audit. The twelve-year average return of 6.5% is lower than the 7.5% expected. However, we are not recommending a change at this time since your current investment policy falls within reasonable expectation of the current market outlook. b. Termination and retirement rates The results of the January 1, 2004 valuation of the plan were based on the assumptions that all members would retire immediately upon the attainment of age 67. In addition, schedules of retirement and withdrawal rates varying by age were assumed prior to age 67. Nine of the active members on January 1, 2004 were projected to withdraw from covered employment during 2004, whereas a total of eleven active members actually January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 2

terminated employment during the year. Thirteen active participants were expected to retire during 2004, but only nine participants retired from active status during 2004. Since actual experience is relatively close to expected, we recommend no changes at this time. We will continue to monitor both assumptions to determine whether any changes are warranted. c. Salary increase assumption The assumed rate of future salary increases used for the valuation of the plan is a graded table based on age, as shown in Appendix A, which anticipated average salary increases during 2004 of 4.1%. Average salary increases for those participants continuing in covered employment was 0.5%, with the median salary increase from 2004 to 2005 of 0.0%, based on a comparison of actual compensation rates for 2004 and 2005. We recommend no change to this assumption. We will continue to monitor this assumption to determine whether any changes are warranted. We recommend the City accept all of our assumptions, as they represent our best estimate of the Plan s future experience. 3. Review the financial effect of experience gains and losses and changes in plan benefits. Under the aggregate cost method, the normal cost rate prior to expenses is expected to remain constant if all assumptions are met. The normal cost rate was determined to be 6.2566% for the January 1, 2004 actuarial valuation of the plan. We determined the normal cost rate for January 1, 2005 to be 8.3875%, an increase of 2.1309%. This increase in the normal cost rate gives rise to an Annual Required Contribution of $1,397,352 for 2005, compared to the Annual Required Contribution of $1,107,920 for 2004. The Annual Required Contribution includes a provision for Plan expenses equal to the average of the prior three years of administrative expenses. If the normal cost rate had remained constant and the provision for expenses remained the same as used in the January 1, 2004 actuarial valuation of the plan, the Annual Required Contribution would have been $1,051,568 for 2005, so the net effect of all the changes for the year was an increase of $345,784 in the plan s Annual Required Contribution. There were a number of contributing factors in the change in the normal cost rate. Prior asset losses that had not yet been recognized in the actuarial value of assets offset the recognition of the asset gains for the 2004 plan year. The effect of each of these factors on the plan s normal cost rate is shown in the following table: January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 3

January 1, 2004 Valuation: 6.2566% Changes: Asset losses from prior years 1.4262% Asset gain for 2004 (0.0850) Salary changes different than assumed (0.5851) Change in disability programming 0.2887 Technical programming change 0.8233 Other, including demographic losses 0.2628 Total 2.1309% January 1, 2005 Valuation: 8.3875% 4. Calculate the plan s Annual Required Contribution and provide the disclosure information required by Government Accounting Standards Board Statement (GASB) No. 25 and No. 27. Section 5 provides the detail on the calculation of the Annual Required Contribution to the plan for the 2005 plan year. This calculation is based on the aggregate cost method. Section 6 sets forth certain information required for the plan s disclosures under GASB No. 25 and No. 27. Highlights of the 2004 plan year There were 569 members reported on January 1, 2005, 324 of whom were active members who continue to accrue benefits under the plan. The remaining 245 were inactive members retaining benefits under the plan. The plan assets earned 9.5% during the 2004 plan year on a market value basis. Over the last five years the average annual return was 1.8%, lower than the assumed rate of return of 7.5%. The average annual return over the last 12 years of 6.5% was also lower than the assumed rate of return of 7.5%. At the end of 2004, the market value of fund assets was $36,661,730. The actuarial value of fund assets was $36,628,565 as of December 31, 2004. The annual recommended contribution for 2005 is $1,397,352 as of January 1, 2005, an increase from 2004. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 4

SECTION 2 SCOPE OF THE REPORT Section 1 of this report presents a summary of the findings resulting from this valuation. Section 2 discusses the Scope of the report. Section 3 contains a summary of the data we received regarding participants of the plan. Section 4 describes the basis we use in assigning values to the Fund s assets, and contains summaries of the assets in Tables 7, 8 and 9. Section 5 expands upon Section 1 in various areas of our findings, and describes the actuarial concepts and methods upon which the findings are based. Table 10 presents the related calculations. Section 6 provides the required GASB No. 25 and No. 27 disclosure information. Section 7 provides historical statistics of the Plan and a 20-year projection of benefit payments. All of the calculations of the valuation were carried out using certain assumptions as to the future experience of the plan. Appendix A summarizes these assumptions. Appendix B outlines the benefit and contribution provisions of the plan as of January 1, 2005. In preparing our report, we relied without audit upon the financial data sent to us by the finance department. We also relied upon the active and inactive member data furnished us by the human resource and finance departments. We tested the member data for missing or incomplete items such as birth dates and membership dates. Based on these tests, we believe all the data to be sufficient and reliable for the purposes of our calculations. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally recognized and accepted actuarial principles and practices. These policies are consistent with the Code of Professional Conduct of the American Academy of Actuaries, and all applicable Actuarial Standards of Practice and accompanying Interpretative Opinions of the Actuarial Standards Board. In our opinion, the assumptions used in the valuation are reasonably related to the experience of the plan. They represent our best estimate of future conditions affecting the plan. Nevertheless, the emerging costs of the plan will vary from those presented in this report to the extent that actual experience differs from that projected by the actuarial assumptions. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 5

SECTION 3 PARTICIPANT DATA The actuarial valuation of the plan is based on the participant data provided to us by the City. The data includes active participants, terminated vested participants who retain benefits under the plan, and retirees and beneficiaries receiving benefits as of January 1, 2005. A total of 569 participants were reported to us and included in this valuation. Table 1 includes a reconciliation of the participant data from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2005. The age and service characteristics of the 324 active participants in the plan as of January 1, 2005 are shown in Table 2. As indicated in Table 2, the average age of the active participants on the valuation date was 52.8, an increase from the average age of 51.9 of the active participants on January 1, 2004. The average years of service of the active participants on January 1, 2005 was 17.3, up from the 16.4 average years of service of the active participants on January 1, 2004. In addition to the active members, there were 113 inactive participants not yet in pay status retaining benefits under the plan. Table 3 contains a summary of the number of inactive participants not yet in pay status who retain benefits under the plan and the amounts of those benefits. Tables 4 and 5 summarize the information provided on the 132 members who are currently receiving monthly benefits. Table 4 contains a summary of the number of participants receiving benefits and the amounts of those benefits, while Table 5 lists the benefits being paid as of January 1 of each year from 1985 to 2005. Counts and total annual benefit amounts are separated by status and sex. Table 6 displays the list of the retirement dates and status of participants eligible for normal or delayed retirement in the next five years. Because participation in the plan was frozen as of January 1, 1999, the number of participants in the plan has declined over the years, as illustrated below: Summary of Plan Participants 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Active Employees Retirees Vested Inactives January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 6

TABLE 1 RECONCILIATION OF PARTICIPANT DATA (January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2005) Actives Terminated Vested* Retired Total Included in January 1, 2004 valuation: 344 112 127 583 Change due to: New entrants N/A N/A 2** 2 Rehired 0 0 0 0 Termination Nonvested 0 N/A N/A 0 Vested (6) 6 N/A 0 Retirement or Disability (7) (1) 8 0 Death 0 0 (4) (4) Cash out (7) (4) 0 (11) Other 0 0 (1)*** (1) Net change (20) 1 5 (14) Included in January 1, 2005 valuation: 324 113 132 569 * Includes three disabled members as of January 1, 2005 who continue to accrue benefit service. * * New beneficiaries. * ** Certain only period expired. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 7

Age CITY OF FORT COLLINS TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Years of Service 1 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to 20 20 to 25 25 to 30 30 & Up Total Number of Participants Under 25 - - - - - - - - 25 to 29-1 - - - - - 1 30 to 34-7 1 - - - - 8 35 to 39-4 3 1 - - - 8 40 to 44 1 4 6 6 - - - 17 45 to 49-13 21 17 6 2-59 50 to 54 1 14 19 27 11 13 10 95 55 to 59-13 18 10 14 12 11 78 60 to 64-14 7 6 4 9 10 50 65 & Up 1 3 - - 1 2 1 8 Total 3 73 75 67 36 38 32 324 Compensation Under 25 - - - - - - - - 25 to 29-43,680 - - - - - 43,680 30 to 34-290,894 35,334 - - - - 326,228 35 to 39-167,656 144,483 52,858 - - - 364,997 40 to 44 39,703 163,406 265,684 295,095 - - - 763,888 45 to 49-604,210 998,509 845,363 324,064 116,220-2,888,366 50 to 54 32,048 659,208 991,152 1,377,934 618,743 727,392 573,638 4,980,115 55 to 59-609,269 854,933 569,233 750,240 750,178 667,758 4,201,611 60 to 64-598,631 286,480 299,469 204,360 616,916 602,394 2,608,250 65 & Up 45,472 119,106 - - 63,960 96,538 53,118 378,194 Total 117,223 3,256,060 3,576,575 3,439,952 1,961,367 2,307,244 1,896,908 16,555,329 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 8 purposes. Milliman does not intend to benefit and assumes no duty or liability to other parties who receive this work.

Age CITY OF FORT COLLINS TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Years of Service 1 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 15 15 to 20 20 to 25 25 to 30 30 & Up Total Average Compensation Under 25 - - - - - - - - 25 to 29-43,680 - - - - - 43,680 30 to 34-41,556 35,334 - - - - 40,779 35 to 39-41,914 48,161 52,858 - - - 45,625 40 to 44 39,703 40,852 44,281 49,183 - - - 44,935 45 to 49-46,478 47,548 49,727 54,011 58,110-48,955 50 to 54 32,048 47,086 52,166 51,035 56,249 55,953 57,364 52,422 55 to 59-46,867 47,496 56,923 53,589 62,515 60,705 53,867 60 to 64-42,759 40,926 49,912 51,090 68,546 60,239 52,165 65 & Up 45,472 39,702 - - 63,960 48,269 53,118 47,274 Total 39,074 44,604 47,688 51,343 54,482 60,717 59,278 51,097 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Not Vested: N/A N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 Partially Vested: N/A N/A N/A 60 40 15 7 3 Fully Vested: N/A N/A N/A 343 345 347 337 321 Total: 839 489 423 403 385 362 344 324 Total Compensation: $30,418,231 $18,911,157 $17,995,935 $18,415,270 $18,803,086 $17,723,762 $17,457,449 $16,555,329 Average Rate of Pay: $36,255 $38,673 $42,544 $45,695 $48,839 $48,961 $50,748 $51,097 Average Service: 10.2 10.6 12.7 13.8 14.8 15.8 16.4 17.3 Average Age: 43.2 46.1 48.5 49.5 50.3 51.2 51.9 52.8 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 9 purposes. Milliman does not intend to benefit and assumes no duty or liability to other parties who receive this work.

TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF DEFERRED VESTED AND DEFERRED DISABLED PARTICIPANTS AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Age Number Total Annual Benefit Average Monthly Benefit 30-34 0 $ 0 $ 0 35-39 2 9,323 388 40-44 12 64,506 448 45-49 26 150,225 481 50-54 34 213,168 522 55-59 26 207,524 665 60-64 11 108,516 822 65 & Up 2 14,560 607 Total 113 $767,822 $ 566 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Deferred Vested* Number: 148 124 108 103 109 108 110 Total Annual Benefit: $837,446 $719,418 $580,374 $560,540 $636,065 $645,553 $701,049 Average Monthly Benefit: $472 $483 $448 $453 $486 $498 $531 Average Age: N/A 47.8 48.2 48.2 49.8 50.6 51.6 Deferred Disabled Number: N/A N/A 6 6 6 4 3 Total Annual Benefit: N/A N/A $100,059 $98,496 $98,496 $76,393 $66,773 Average Monthly Benefit: N/A N/A $1,390 $1,368 $1,368 $1,592 $1,855 Average Age: N/A N/A 59.2 59.2 60.2 58.8 57.7 * Includes Deferred Disabled prior to 2001. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 10

TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF RETIREES, DISABLEDS, AND BENEFICIARIES AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 Retirees Disabled Retirees Beneficiaries Total Age Number Annual Benefit Average Monthly Benefit Number Annual Benefit Average Monthly Benefit Number Annual Benefit Average Monthly Benefit Number Annual Benefit Average Monthly Benefit 55-59 6 $ 41,195 60-64 11 126,591 65-69 38 70-74 17 75-79 20 80-84 14 $ 572 0 $ 0 $ 0 1 $ 2,594 $ 216 7 $ 43,789 $ 521 959 1 3,819 318 0 0 0 12 130,410 906 388,878 853 1 3,729 311 1 6,433 536 40 399,040 831 135,989 667 2 21,255 886 1 3,572 298 20 160,816 670 156,928 654 2 20,934 872 7 41,594 495 29 219,456 631 155,751 927 1 1,570 131 2 19,575 816 17 176,896 867 Above 85 4 17,884 373 0 0 0 3 16,176 449 7 34,060 405 Total 110 $1,023,216 $ 775 7 $ 51,307 $ 611 15 $ 89,944 $ 500 132 $ 1,164,467 $ 735 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Retirees* Number: 96 101 97 96 97 102 106 110 Total Annual Benefit: $628,684 $728,420 $726,662 $786,970 $800,014 $885,832 $964,937 $1,023,216 Average Monthly Benefit: $546 $594 $624 $683 $687 $724 $759 $775 Average Age: N/A N/A 71.2 72.1 72.4 71.8 71.2 71.2 Disabled Number: N/A N/A 7 7 8 8 7 7 Total Annual Benefit: N/A N/A $43,461 $46,331 $57,589 $57,589 $51,307 $51,307 Average Monthly Benefit: N/A N/A $517 $552 $600 $600 $611 $611 Average Age: N/A N/A 68.7 68.9 69.8 70.8 71.0 72.0 Beneficiaries Number: 11 12 13 14 14 13 14 15 Total Annual Benefit: $53,611 $56,699 $64,531 $75,335 $75,335 $71,623 $80,597 $89,944 Average Monthly Benefit: $406 $394 $414 $448 $448 $459 $480 $500 Average Age: N/A N/A 75.5 72.8 73.8 74.5 75.0 77.1 *Includes Disabled Retirees from 1995-1999 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 11 purposes. Milliman does not intend to benefit and assumes no duty or liability to other parties who receive this work.

TABLE 5 NUMBER OF PENSIONERS AND AMOUNT OF ANNUAL ANNUITY AS OF THE END OF EACH YEAR Retirement* Beneficiaries* Disability** Male Female Male Female Male Female All Year No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount No. Amount 1985 46 $130,578 $ 5 $ 5,643 $ $ $ 51 $136,221 1986 67 250,103 7 14,058 74 264,161 1987 72 267,262 6 12,904 78 280,166 1988 70 264,467 6 9,299 76 273,766 1989 75 355,402 5 15,931 80 371,333 1990 65 370,147 19 38,437 2 3,561 3 12,370 2 2,041 0 0 91 426,556 1991 64 370,359 17 42,832 3 4,736 3 14,349 2 2,041 0 0 89 434,317 1992 65 375,014 18 51,214 3 4,736 4 15,640 2 2,041 1 5,692 93 454,337 1993 67 393,340 22 79,136 3 4,736 7 35,056 3 18,485 1 5,692 103 536,445 1994 60 394,223 17 75,333 1 3,099 8 39,381 3 21,369 2 10,884 91 544,287 1995 55 359,659 17 77,358 1 3,099 11 55,120 4 25,825 2 10,884 90 531,945 1996 66 466,177 18 84,593 1 3,099 10 50,512 4 25,825 2 10,884 101 641,090 1997 68 477,993 21 104,091 1 3,099 10 50,512 5 35,717 2 10,884 107 682,296 1998 70 547,160 23 121,654 1 3,099 11 53,600 6 40,722 2 10,884 113 777,119 1999 74 593,649 23 133,013 1 3,099 12 61,432 5 32,577 2 10,884 117 834,654 2000 74 650,175 22 136,795 1 3,572 13 71,763 5 34,506 2 11,825 117 908,636 2001 74 656,815 23 143,199 1 3,572 13 71,763 6 45,764 2 11,825 119 932,938 2002 73 691,385 29 194,447 1 3,572 12 68,051 6 45,764 2 11,825 123 1,015,044 2003 75 750,807 31 214,130 2 9,855 12 70,742 6 45,764 1 5,543 127 1,096,841 2004 77 807,941 33 215,275 2 9,855 13 80,089 6 45,764 1 5,543 132 1,164,467 * Male and female splits are not available prior to 1990. ** Retirement and disability splits are not available prior to 1990. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 12 purposes. Milliman does not intend to benefit and assumes no duty or liability to other parties who receive this work.

TABLE 6 SCHEDULE OF MEMBERS ELIGIBLE FOR NORMAL OR DELAYED RETIREMENT IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS Normal Retirement Date Current Status 08/01/99 Active 09/01/00 Terminated Vested 10/01/01 Active 02/01/03 Active 10/01/04 Active 03/01/05 Active 04/01/05 Active 06/01/05 Active 06/01/05 Active 06/01/05 Terminated Vested 08/01/05 Active 11/01/05 Active 01/01/06 Active 02/01/06 Terminated Vested 04/01/06 Deferred Disabled 07/01/06 Active 07/01/06 Terminated Vested 10/01/06 Active 10/01/06 Active 12/01/06 Active 12/01/06 Active 01/01/07 Active 01/01/07 Active 02/01/07 Active 06/01/07 Active 08/01/07 Active 09/01/07 Active 09/01/07 Terminated Vested 01/01/08 Active 02/01/08 Active 02/01/08 Terminated Vested 05/01/08 Active 06/01/08 Active 07/01/08 Active 07/01/08 Active 07/01/08 Active 08/01/08 Active 08/01/08 Active 09/01/08 Active 09/01/08 Active January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 13

TABLE 6 (CONTINUED) SCHEDULE OF MEMBERS ELIGIBLE FOR NORMAL OR DELAYED RETIREMENT IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS Normal Retirement Date Current Status 09/01/08 Active 09/01/08 Terminated Vested 11/01/08 Active 12/01/08 Active 12/01/08 Active 01/01/09 Active 01/01/09 Terminated Vested 03/01/09 Active 03/01/09 Active 03/01/09 Terminated Vested 04/01/09 Active 05/01/09 Active 06/01/09 Active 06/01/09 Active 07/01/09 Deferred Disabled 08/01/09 Active 09/01/09 Active 09/01/09 Active 09/01/09 Active 10/01/09 Active 11/01/09 Active 12/01/09 Active 01/01/10 Terminated Vested January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 14

SECTION 4 FINANCIAL DATA Table 7 displays a Statement of the Market Value of Assets, and Table 8 presents a summary of the changes in the market value of assets. During 2004, the market value of the plan assets increased by $2,554,398. Benefit payments for 2004 were $1,730,646, an increase from $1,471,914 during the preceding year. For the purpose of the actuarial valuation, the investment income of the Fund consists of interest and dividends as well as realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments. During 2004, investment gains totaled $3,221,582. The fund earned 9.5% on a market value basis and 3.0% on an actuarial value basis. The fund returned 18.8% on a market value basis for 2003. For funding purposes, gains and losses over our 7.5% assumed rate of return are recognized over a five-year period. The development of the actuarial value of assets is shown in Table 9. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 15

TABLE 7 STATEMENT OF MARKET VALUE OF ASSETS FOR THE PLAN YEARS 2004 AND 2003 December 31, 2004 December 31, 2003 CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS $ 0 $ 0 INVESTMENTS: Domestic Mutual Funds $ 17,310,800 $ 14,576,096 International Mutual Funds 5,791,008 3,907,376 Fixed Income Funds 13,166,002 15,544,983 Total $ 36,267,811 $ 34,028,455 RECEIVABLES Employer Contributions $ 300,000 $ 0 Accrued Interest and Dividends 94,993 78,877 Total $ 394,993 $ 78,877 LIABILITIES Expenses and Benefits Payable $ 1,074 $ 0 Investment Transaction 0 0 Total $ 1,074 $ 0 TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF ASSETS $ 36,661,730 $ 34,107,332 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 16

TABLE 8 CHANGE IN MARKET VALUE OF ASSETS FOR THE PLAN YEARS 2004 AND 2003 2004 2003 Market value at beginning of year $34,107,332 $29,081,432 Income: Contributions $ 1,080,346 $ 1,063,786 Investment income 1,107,072 945,245 Realized and unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) 2,114,510 4,507,025 Total $ 4,301,928 $ 6,516,056 Disbursements: Benefit payments: Periodic Payments $ 1,133,324 $ 1,057,243 Lump Sum Distributions 597,322 414,671 Expenses 16,884 18,242 Total $ 1,747,530 $ 1,490,156 Net income: $ 2,554,398 $ 5,025,900 Market value at end of year $36,661,730 $34,107,332 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 17

GAIN/(LOSS) CITY OF FORT COLLINS TABLE 9 DEVELOPMENT OF ACTUARIAL VALUE OF ASSETS Actuarial value at beginning of year: $ 36,208,321 Contributions: 1,080,346 Disbursements: (1,730,646) Expected Interest: 2,691,238 Expected actuarial value at end of year: $ 38,249,259 Unrecognized asset gain/(loss) as of end of prior year: (2,100,989) Expected actuarial value plus prior year's unrecognized gain/(loss): $ 36,148,270 Actual market value at end of year: $ 36,661,730 Gain/(loss) for Year: $ 513,460 ASSET GAIN/(LOSS) RECOGNIZED Original Amount Recognized This Year Recognized in Prior Years To Be Recognized in the Future 2000 $ (3,543,061) $ (708,612) $ (2,834,449) $ 0 2001 (3,845,731) (769,146) (2,307,439) (769,146) 2002 (5,642,119) (1,128,424) (2,256,847) (2,256,848) 2003 4,413,983 882,796 882,796 2,648,391 2004 513,460 102,692 0 410,768 Total $ (8,103,468) $ (1,620,694) $ (6,515,939) $ 33,165 ACTUARIAL VALUE OF ASSETS 1. Expected actuarial value as of December 31, 2004 $ 38,249,259 2. Gain/(loss) to be recognized this year (1,620,694) 3. Initial Actuarial Value of Assets (1. + 2.) $ 36,628,565 4. 80% of Market Value $ 29,329,384 5. 120% of Market Value $ 43,994,076 6. Actuarial Value of Assets (3., but not less than 4. or greater than 5.) $ 36,628,565 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 18

SECTION 5 DEVELOPMENT OF ANNUAL REQUIRED CONTRIBUTION A fundamental principle in financing a benefit program is that the cost of its benefits should be related to when those benefits are earned, rather than to when they are paid. Various methods are used by actuaries to determine costs that satisfy this principle. This and the prior actuarial valuations were prepared using the aggregate cost method. The cost method allocates the total cost of the Plan over time: the normal cost is that portion of the cost allocated to the current period. The present value of future normal costs is equal to the excess of the present value of projected benefits over the actuarial value of assets. The normal cost accrual rate is equal to the present value of future normal costs divided by the present value of future covered payroll for current active participants. The normal cost is the covered current payroll multiplied by the normal cost accrual rate. The present value of projected benefits is the present value of all future benefits expected to be paid to current plan members. Most of this liability is for active members of the plan, as illustrated below: Present Value of Projected Benefits 71% 7% 22% Actives Vested Inactive Retirees The plan s annual required contribution (ARC) is actuarially determined in accordance with Statement No. 25 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB No. 25). Under the method adopted by the City, the ARC is the normal cost under the aggregate normal cost method plus a provision for expenses, and is shown in Table 10. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 19

TABLE 10 DEVELOPMENT OF ANNUAL REQUIRED CONTRIBUTION AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005 AND JANUARY 1, 2004 January 1, 2005 January 1, 2004 1. Present Value of Projected Benefits a. For retirees and beneficiaries: $ 10,178,873 $ 9,631,939 b. For vested terminated participants: 3,259,025 2,909,569 c. For active participants: 32,966,577 31,694,368 d. Total [(a) + (b) + (c)] $ 46,404,475 $ 44,235,876 2. Actuarial Value of Assets: $ 36,628,565 $ 36,208,321 3. Present Value of Future Normal Costs [(1) - (2)] $ 9,775,910 $ 8,027,555 4. Present Value of Future Compensation: $ 116,553,666 $ 128,305,946 5. Normal Cost Rate [(3) (4)] 8.3875% 6.2566% 6. Current Compensation for Employees Under Age 67: $ 16,423,067 $ 17,323,755 7. Normal Cost [(5) x (6)] $ 1,377,485 $ 1,083,878 8. Expected Expenses: $ 19,867 $ 24,042 9. Annual Required Contribution [(7) + (8)] $ 1,397,352 $ 1,107,920 10. Annual Required Contribution as a Percentage of Total Compensation*: 8.44% 6.35% * Total Compensation includes compensation for those participants over the assumed retirement age (age 67). This amount is $16,555,329 for 2005, and $17,457,449 for 2004. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 20

SECTION 6 DISCLOSURE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD STATEMENT NO. 25 AND NO. 27 Tables 11 and 12 provide the disclosure information required by Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 25, Financial Reporting for Defined Benefit Pension Plans and Note Disclosures for Defined Contribution Plans, and Statement No. 27, Accounting for Pensions by State and Local Governmental Employees. The assumptions and methods used for these funding disclosures meet the parameters set forth in GASB No. 25 and No. 27, and, other than those described below, are outlined in Table 13 and Appendix A of this report. GASB 25 generally requires two schedules of historical trend information for the plan: a schedule of funding progress and a schedule of employer contributions as they relate to the plan s Annual Required Contribution (ARC). The chart below provides historical information on the plan s ARC. Although the amount of plan s ARC has varied over the years, it has remained fairly level as a percent of payroll until 2003, as shown in the following table. The rate increased out of the previous range primarily due to the decline in the stock market. 10.00% 8.00% 6.00% 4.00% 2.00% 0.00% 4.03% 4.41% 4.30% Annual Required Contribution (as a Percent of Compensation) 4.46% 4.72% 4.22% 3.98% 4.31% 5.69% 6.35% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 8.44% Annual Required Contribution Actual Contribution The required schedule of employer contributions is included as Table 12 along with the schedule of funding progress. Plans that utilize the aggregate cost method are not required to present a schedule of funding progress but merely need to disclose the use of the aggregate cost method. The pension cost is the ARC plus an amortization of the net pension obligation. The net pension obligation is the cumulative difference between the ARC and the employer contribution to the plan. In this context, the net pension obligation will decrease if contributions exceed the ARC and will increase if the entire ARC is not contributed each year. Table 11 shows the calculation of the net pension obligation and annual pension cost. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 21

TABLE 11 CALCULATION OF NET PENSION OBLIGATION AND PENSION COST (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Fiscal Year Annual Required Contribution (ARC) (a) Net Pension Obligation (NPO) as of January 1 Interest on NPO to End of Year Amortization Factor ARC Adjustment Annual Pension Cost (APC) Actual Employer Contribution Net Pension Obligation at End of Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 $ 989,308 $ 0 $ 0 8.2546 $ 0 $ 989,308 $ 943,914 $ 45,394 1,183,591 45,394 3,405 9.0685 5,006 1,181,990 1,166,520 60,864 1,223,824 60,864 4,565 8.9751 6,781 1,221,608 1,292,790 (10,318) 1,357,123 (10,318) (774) 8.8974 (1,160) 1,357,509 1,451,382 (104,191) 891,830 (104,191) (7,814) 8.1365 (12,805) 896,821 816,305 (23,675) 760,075 (23,675) (1,776) 7.7338 (3,061) 761,360 1,480,525 (b) (742,840) 733,342 (742,840) (55,713) 7.5966 (97,786) 775,415 854,884 (822,309) 809,796 (822,309) (61,673) 7.4086 (110,994) 859,117 1,105,967 (1,069,159) 1,008,352 (1,069,159) (80,187) 7.4830 (142,878) 1,071,043 1,063,786 (1,061,902) 1,107,920 (1,061,902) (79,643) 6.8896 (154,131) 1,182,408 1,080,346 (959,840) 1,397,352 (959,840) (71,988) 6.6018 (145,391) 1,470,755 (a) The annual pension cost is the annual required contribution computed under the aggregate cost method plus an amortization of the net pension obligation from the beginning of the prior year as a level percent of the current members future expected salaries. (b) The contributions for 2000 include $635,726 in contributions made to cover the cost-of-living adjustments. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 22 purposes. Milliman does not intend to benefit and assumes no duty or liability to other parties who receive this work.

TABLE 12 SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS, THREE-YEAR TREND INFORMATION AND SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS SCHEDULE OF EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS Fiscal Year Annual Required Contribution Employer Contribution Percent Contributed 1998 1,357,123 1,451,382 106.9% 1999 891,830 816,305 91.5% 2000 760,075 1,480,525 (1) 194.8% 2001 733,342 854,884 116.6% 2002 809,796 1,105,967 136.6% 2003 1,008,352 1,063,786 105.5% 2004 1,107,920 1,080,346 97.5% (1) The contributions for 2000 include $635,726 in contributions made to cover the cost-of-living adjustments. THREE-YEAR TREND INFORMATION Fiscal Year Annual Pension Cost (APC) Percent of APC Contributed Net Pension Obligation 2002 859,117 128.7% (1,069,159) 2003 1,071,043 99.3% (1,061,902) 2004 1,182,408 91.4% (959,840) SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS The actuarial cost method used for this valuation is the aggregate actuarial cost method. A schedule of funding progress is not required for plans using this cost method as noted in GASB 25, paragraph 33, footnote 17. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 23

TABLE 13 NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The information presented in required supplementary schedules was determined as part of the actuarial valuations at the dates indicated. Additional information as of the latest actuarial valuation follows: Valuation date January 1, 2005 Actuarial cost method Amortization method Remaining amortization period Asset valuation method Actuarial assumptions: Aggregate N/A. The Aggregate actuarial cost method does not identify or separately amortize the unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities. N/A An expected actuarial value is determined equal to the prior year s actuarial value of assets plus cash flow (excluding realized and unrealized gains or losses) for the year ended on the valuation date and assuming 7.5% interest. The unrecognized gain or loss is then added to the expected value. Any difference between this amount and the market value of assets is set up as a gain or loss base and amortized over five years. The expected actuarial value plus the amortization of prior gain or losses is constrained to a value of 80% to 120% of the market value of assets at the valuation date in order to determine the final actuarial value of assets. Investment rate of return* 7.5% Projected salary increases* * Includes inflation at 2.5% Age Total 25 8.2% 30 6.4 35 5.5 40 4.8 45 4.4 50 4.1 55 3.8 60 3.6 64 3.5 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 24

SECTION 7 HISTORY AND PROJECTIONS Table 14 shows seven years of the more important Plan statistics. Participant Statistics: Changes, if any, in the active and inactive participants characteristics over time can cause significant changes in costs. Investment Return: Investment return often represents the largest sources of actuarial gain or loss. Present Value of Projected Benefits: This represents the present value of benefits earned currently, plus all benefits expected to be earned in the future. Assumptions: Changes, if any, in the assumptions used to value plan liabilities can have a dramatic effect. Several key assumptions are shown in Table 13. Table 15 provides a projection of benefit payments over the next twenty years. This can be useful for the investment manager in planning future liquidity requirements, although this exhibit does not attempt to predict future lump sum payments to terminating employees. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 25

TABLE 14 HISTORICAL STATISTICS 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Assets Market Value of Assets $ 29,782,371 $ 35,090,863 $ 33,833,764 $ 32,062,446 $ 29,082,465 $ 34,107,332 $ 36,661,730 Actuarial Value of Assets $ 27,956,716 $ 30,729,463 $ 33,661,863 $ 35,448,598 $ 34,898,958 $ 36,208,321 $ 36,628,565 Ratio 93.9% 87.6% 99.5% 110.6% 120.0% 106.2% 99.9% Market Value Return 8.8% 21.1% (3.5)% (4.0)% (9.3)% 18.8% 9.5% Annual Required Contribution $ 891,830 $ 760,075 $ 733,342 $ 809,796 $ 1,008,352 $ 1,107,920 $ 1,397,352 As a Percent of Pay 4.7% 4.2% 4.0% 4.3% 5.7% 6.4% 8.4% Present Value of Projected Benefits For retirees and beneficiaries $ 6,574,469 $ 7,044,688 $ 7,639,043 $ 7,769,365 $ 8,627,830 $ 9,631,939 $ 10,178,873 For terminated vested participants 2,870,486 2,404,756 2,385,122 2, 405,103 2,775,952 2,909,569 3,259,025 For active participants 25,776,545 27,062,512 29,147,407 31,431,446 31,379,826 31,694,368 32,966,577 Total $ 35,221,500 $ 36,511,956 $ 39,171,572 $ 41,605,914 $ 42,783,608 $ 44,235,876 $ 46,404,475 Participant Statistics Retired Participants Number 113 117 117 119 123 127 132 Average Monthly Benefits $ 573 $ 594 $ 647 $ 653 $ 688 $ 720 $ 735 Vested Inactive Participants Number 148 124 114 109 116 112 113 Average Monthly Benefits $ 472 $ 483 $ 497 $ 504 $ 532 $ 537 $ 566 Active Participants Number of Participants 489 423 403 385 362 344 324 Average Compensation $ 38,673 $ 42,544 $ 45,695 $ 48,839 $ 48,961 $ 50,748 $ 51,097 Average Years of Service 10.6 12.7 13.8 14.8 15.8 16.4 17.3 Average Age 46.1 48.5 49.5 50.3 51.2 51.9 52.8 Actuarial Assumptions Interest 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% 7.50% Salary Growth Table Table Table Table Table Table Table Mortality Table Utilized 83GAM 83GAM 83GAM 83GAM 83GAM 94GAM 94GAM January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 26 purposes. Milliman does not intend to benefit and assumes no duty or liability to other parties who receive this work.

TABLE 15 TWENTY-YEAR PROJECTION OF BENEFIT PAYMENTS Plan Year Estimated Annual Benefit Payments 2005 1,323,000 2006 1,483,000 2007 1,657,000 2008 1,860,000 2009 2,156,000 2010 2,440,000 2011 2,707,000 2012 2,999,000 2013 3,288,000 2014 3,684,000 2015 4,059,000 2016 4,401,000 2017 4,704,000 2018 5,044,000 2019 5,395,000 2020 5,658,000 2021 5,889,000 2022 6,043,000 2023 6,156,000 2024 6,169,000 January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 27

APPENDIX A ACTUARIAL PROCEDURES AND ASSUMPTIONS The actuarial assumptions used in the valuation are intended to estimate future experience affecting projected benefit flow and investment earnings. Any variations in future experience from that expected from these assumptions will result in corresponding changes in the estimated costs of the plan s benefits. The tables in this section give rates of decrement, referred to in actuarial notation by the general symbol q'. The underlying theory is described more fully in Jordan, Life Contingencies, Society of Actuaries (Second Edition, 1967), page 277. Any age referred to in a table is always the age of the person at his or her nearest birthday. Actuarial Cost Method The actuarial cost method we use to calculate the funding requirements of the Plan is called the aggregate actuarial cost method. The actuarial cost method is used to calculate the normal cost. The normal cost plus a provision for expenses is the Annual Required Contribution. The cost method allocates the total cost of the Plan over time: the normal cost is that portion of the cost allocated to the current period. The present value of future normal costs is equal to the excess of the projected benefit liability over the actuarial value of assets. The normal cost accrual rate is equal to the present value of future normal costs divided by the present value of future covered payroll for current active participants. The normal cost is the covered current payroll multiplied by the normal cost accrual rate. Under the aggregate cost method, normal costs will be a level percent of payroll when all assumptions are met. Variations in actual experience will result in increases or decreases in the normal cost accrual rate. Actuarial Value of Assets An expected actuarial value is determined equal to the prior year's actuarial value of assets plus cash flow (excluding realized and unrealized gains or losses) for the year ended on the valuation date and assuming 7.5% interest. The unrecognized gain or loss is then added to the expected value. Any difference between this amount and the market value of assets is set up as a gain or loss base and amortized over five years. The expected actuarial value plus the amortization of prior gain or losses is constrained to a value of 80% to 120% of the market value of assets at the valuation date in order to determine the final actuarial value of assets. Investment Earnings 7.50% per annum, compounded annually. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 28

Earnings Progression Annual salary increases are based on a table graded by age, as displayed below: Age Percentage Increase at Age Merit Inflation Total 25 5.7% 2.5% 8.2% 30 3.9 2.5 6.4 35 3.0 2.5 5.5 40 2.3 2.5 4.8 45 1.9 2.5 4.4 50 1.6 2.5 4.1 55 1.3 2.5 3.8 60 1.1 2.5 3.6 64 1.0 2.5 3.5 COLA None. Retirement The following table sets forth the probability of retirement according to age. Rates begin at age 55 with 6 years of service and produce an average retirement age of 62. Age Probability of Retirement 55 10% 56 5 57 5 58 5 59 5 60 5 61 5 62 20 63 10 64 10 65 50 66 50 67 & Over 100 Deferred Vested participants were assumed to retire at age 65. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 29

Expenses The average of the prior three year's expenses: Year Expenses 2004 $ 16,884 2003 18,242 2002 24,475 Total $ 59,601 Average $ 19,867 Disablement Graduated rates are used. See table below for sample rates. Mortality Healthy and Disabled: The 1994 Group Annuity Mortality Table for males and females is used for actuarial valuation purposes only. This table is not used to determine actuarial equivalence. Withdrawal Rates Graduated rates are used. Sample rates are as follows: Age at Withdrawal Termination Male Female Disability 25 14.24% 15.41% 0.15% 35 8.58 9.53 0.19 45 3.89 5.24 0.45 55 2.00 3.29 1.19 60 1.50 2.15 1.80 Marriage Rates 85% of all active and terminated participants not currently receiving benefits are assumed to be married. Male spouses are assumed to be three years older than their female spouses. Future Credited Service The Future Credited Service rate is equal to the member s Full Time Equivalent (FTE) rate as of December 31 preceding the current valuation year. Changes in Actuarial Assumptions and Methods as of January 1, 2005 None. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 30

APPENDIX B PLAN SUMMARY All actuarial calculations are based upon our understanding of the provisions of City of Fort Collins General Employees Retirement Plan, as adopted and in effect on January 1, 2005. This summary does not attempt to cover all of the detailed provisions. Plan Year The Plan Year is the 12-month period beginning January 1 and ending December 31. Effective Date The original effective date of the plan is January 1, 1971. The plan was most recently restated effective December 31, 2001 and amended effective July 1, 2003. Eligible Employee Classification All persons employed to fill a classified position defined by the city, excluding police officers and firefighters, shall become a member of the Plan on the later of the Effective Date of the Plan or Date of Hire. The Plan was frozen to new entrants as of January 1, 1999. Accrued Benefit The Accrued Benefit for each Member is the Member's Normal Retirement Benefit calculated using Average Monthly Compensation and Credited Service as of the calculation date. In no event will a Member s Accrued Benefit be less than the Accrued Benefit earned as of June 30, 2003. Average Monthly Compensation A Member s Average Monthly Compensation, as of a given date, is the average of the highest 60 consecutive months of considered compensation during the last 120 months of Credited Service. In the event that a participant was employed on a part time basis during any portion of this period, the compensation will be converted to a full time equivalent for purposes of calculating the Average Monthly Compensation. Compensation Compensation is the gross compensation included as taxable income on Form W-2, excluding bonuses, compensatory time recorded as additional hours, overtime pay, workers' compensation accrued vacation pay, taxable fringe benefits, but including any amounts contributed by the City to a salary reduction agreement including Code Sections 125, 132(f)(4), 402(a)(8), 403(b), 402(a), and 457. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 31

Credited Service A Year of Service is credited for each plan year a member works 2,080 hours. If the member works less than 2,080 hours, a partial Year of Service will be credited on a prorate basis based on the number of hours for which compensation is paid. Service is credited while a member is on long-term disability as long as no benefits are being paid from the plan. Vested Accrued Benefit A Participant's Vested Accrued Benefit as of a given date is equal to the product of his Accrued Benefit multiplied by his Vested Percentage as of that same date. Vesting Schedule Members become vested in their Accrued Benefit according to the following schedule: Years of Percent Credited Service Vested Less than 2 0% 2 40% 3 60% 4 80% 5 and over 100% Normal Retirement Date A Participant s Normal Retirement Age is the first of the month coincident with or next following the attainment of age 65. Normal Retirement Benefits Each Member who becomes eligible for a Normal Retirement Benefit under the plan will be entitled to receive a monthly retirement pension benefit beginning at the Member's Normal Retirement Date and payable in the Normal Benefit Form equal to: 1.5% of Average Monthly Compensation, multiplied by Credited Service. Normal Benefit Form Life Annuity - Monthly pension benefit payable for the lifetime of the Member. Early Retirement (a) (b) Early Retirement Date A Member's Early Retirement Date is the first day of the month so elected by the Member which coincides with or next follows the date upon which the Member attains age 55 and completes 2 Years of Service. Early Retirement Benefit A Member's Early Retirement Benefit is a monthly pension benefit equal to his Accrued Benefit determined as of his Early Retirement Date, reduced by 1/15 th for the first 5 years and 1/30 th for each of the next 5 years payments commence prior to age 65. January 1, 2005 Valuation (5/2005) 32