PENSION SYSTEM RESUMPTION (PSR) RECOVERY PLAN PROJECT

Similar documents
Virginia Department of Taxation eforms System Category: Government to Business. Initiation date: February 1, Completion date: June 1, 2012

Insurers Driving Agility and Cost Optimization With BPM-Enabled SOA

Meeting the challenges of the changing actuarial role. Actuarial Transformation in property-casualty insurers

2016 Michigan NASCIO Award Nomination. Michigan Medicaid as a Service

It s safe to say that over the past 10

2014 EY US life insuranceannuity

FROM 12 TO 21: OUR WAY FORWARD

Global Insurance CFO Survey 2014

PENSION ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM 5 (PENFAX)

Increasing Speed to Market in the Life Insurance Industry

Spotlight: Robotic Process Automation (RPA) What Tax needs to know now

Conservation and Demand Management Information Solution (CDM-IS) FAQ s

Remote Advice in Life Insurance: A New Route to the Customer

STRATEGIC IT FINANCE. 6 best practices for. Executive summary. Empowering IT Finance to align spend with business priorities.

Guidewire ClaimCenter. Adapt and succeed

IFRS 4 Phase II Operational impacts

Business Plan

Get Smarter. Data Analytics in the Canadian Life Insurance Industry. Introduction. Highlights. Financial Services & Insurance White Paper

Overview. With the property & casualty solution from TCS BaNCS, your insurance firm can gain from:

County of Orange IT Quarterly Status Report Risk Assessment. Fiscal Year rd Quarter, January - March

POWERLINE SAFETY FY2014 ACHIEVEMENTS FY2013-FY2015 PLANS

CHAMPIONING A PROSPEROUS, DIVERSE AND CONNECTED REGIONAL ECONOMY

Combining Financial Management and Collections to Increase Revenue and Efficiency

Managing operational tax risk through technology

FIS INSURANCE PROCESS CONTROLLER SYSTEM INTEGRATION, PROCESS AUTOMATION AND COMPOSITE APPLICATION PLATFORM

How can your finance function become IPO ready?

The Digital-First Mortgage MAKING BORROWERS, LOAN OFFICERS, AND PARTNERS FEEL RIGHT AT HOME

Welcome to Service Strategy To Support Digital Transformation

Disruption or Disrupted. How Digital Transformation is changing IT?

The role of an actuary in a Policy Administration System implementation

Proven Strategies for Creating a Financially Sustainable Health Insurance Exchange

CONTENTS. Introduction 2. Survey Highlights 3. Survey Demographics 5. Processes 10. Challenges 17

CASESTUDY. PLAN SPONSORS: FINDING VALUE TO RIGHT THE SHIP

Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General

Case Study: Rapid Policy Administration Replacement at Philadelphia Insurance Companies July 2011

The next step forward Can one actuarial system do it all?

National Association of Government Defined Contribution Administrators, Inc.

Section II PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY GUIDELINES

Basel Infrastructure Survey 2012 kpmg.com

MARS COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT. A Bloomberg Professional Service Offering MAKE THE RIGHT CALL

Blockchain: A true disruptor for the energy industry Use cases and strategic questions

MiFID II Solutions. IHS Markit s comprehensive set of solutions to meet MiFID II requirements

You can't optimize what you can't automate and audit. JJ Garcia Public Sector ITOM Solution Architect March 8, 2018

2015 STAR Best Practices

Running Your Business for Growth

GUIDEWIRE QE&A APPROACH PAPER. Get Quality Right, The First Time. Cognizant Center of Excellence for Guidewire Quality Assurance

Enhanced Cyber Risk Management Standards. Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Robots join the team. Automation, transformation and the future of actuarial work for insurers

Task 2: Strengthen the regional capacity and cooperation towards data and knowledge sharing on risks.)

For further information, please contact Guy Leroux at

Director s Message. I am very pleased to present the Strategic Plan for the California Child Support Services Program.

TRANSACTION ADVISORY SERVICES. Customized, value-added solutions every step of the way

The value of a stand-alone rating engine

Key Milestones & Decisions

Cabinet Committee on State Sector Reform and Expenditure Control STAGE 2 OF TRANSFORMING NEW ZEALAND S REVENUE SYSTEM

The March Toward Standardization

FE CREDIT EMBARKS ON A TRANSFORMATION JOURNEY WITH FINACLE

Ensuring Payer Compliance with Mandatory Insurer Reporting Requirements. A Proactive Approach to Managing Mandatory Insurer Reporting Compliance

Embarking on the IPO Journey. kpmg.com

Outcome Based Budgeting

Introduction to Detailed Claim Information Reporting. Lesson 4: Resources and Tools

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat

Best practices for multiple sub-adviser mutual funds

Improving the Processes for Budgeting, Managing, and Forecasting Special Education Spending

Alternative Investments Advisory Services. kpmg.com

A VISIBLY DIFFERENT APPROACH TO PHARMACY BENEFITS FOR GOVERNMENT

What You Need to Know about the Spatial Information Function. Role of a SIF in NG9-1-1

Adding Transparency and Lowering the Cost of Institutional Trading

Investor Presentation

smart South Carolina Deferred Compensation Program Plan Service Center Guide

FY20 Proposed Budget for the Office of the Chief Information Officer (CIO)

Actuarial 20/20 Transform the function

CITY CLERK MISSION STATEMENT STRUCTURE AND SERVICES

North Carolina Department of State Treasurer Integrated Retirement System Project Online Retirement Benefits Through Integrated Technology

Tax Agency Long-Term Modernization - Incrementally. Neena Savage Tax Administrator Rhode Island Division of Taxation

TIMELINE OF BUSINESS MILESTONES

The excellent results achieved by Belfius in 2015 validate its customer satisfaction strategy

Status of the Implementation of the Child Welfare Component of the North Carolina Families Accessing Services through Technology (NC FAST) System

Member Discount Directory. FPA Business Support

Securities Briefing: Presenting Insight from Across the Market

Enterprise Risk Management by Many Other Names is Still Enterprise Risk Management David K. Whatley UTH Advisors April 15,2008

European Solvency II Survey 2014

Audit of the Accelerated Infrastructure Program 2 Governance Phase 1 and 2

Single Security and CSP Industry Advisory Group Meeting Fannie Mae Conference Center 4000 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20016

The tables on the following pages summarise both new and continuing commitments. Page 1 of 18

BUILDING INSURANCE HEROES

Tax Technology. Our Approach. Service Line Overview

Four key capabilities for the future of underwriting. Findings from the EY-CPCU Society underwriting survey

Title of Nomination: CalPERS Empowers Its Members with Web "Self-Service" Project/System Manager: Teri Lynch Title: Assistant Division Chief Agency:

Digital Turbine Reports Fiscal 2019 Third Quarter Results

EUROPEAN CITIZENS INITIATIVES AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTIONS ( )

Improve business results by first improving your vendor selection

Are you ready to go public?

Distributed Ledger Technology and Cryptocurrencies

Budget Engagement That Works

Impact of VAT Compliance on Business. Pierre Arman Market Lead for Tax & Accounting Thomson Reuters MENA Qatar Chamber of Commerce February 2018

White Paper. Not Just Knowledge, Know How! Artificial Intelligence for Finance!

A L A S T A I R K D O N A L D

T R A N S F O R M AT I O N A L I N I T I AT I V E S U P D AT E B O A R D O F S U P E R V I S O R S M E E T I N G J U N E 7,

MODELLING INSURANCE BUSINESS IN PROPHET UNDER IFRS 17

Transcription:

NASCIO AWARD NOMINATION FOR DIGITAL GOVERNMENT: GOVERNMENT TO BUSINESS (G TO B) PENSION SYSTEM RESUMPTION (PSR) RECOVERY PLAN PROJECT CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM INITIATED MARCH 2010 COMPLETED SEPTEMBER 2011 DALE JABLONSKY ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE OFFICER KAREN RUIZ PROJECT DIRECTOR

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Health and retirement benefits cannot be paid until the information in a government employee s account is accurate. Yet regulations fostered an environment between state employers and business providers where more than 109 different systems were required to record and coordinate benefit information for California state workers. Different data was sent to each system. Data discrepancies were common, requiring business partners to undertake onerous reviews before benefits could be paid. To address these problems, the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS or PERS ) initiated the Pension System Resumption (PSR) Project to provide a consolidated information exchange that would integrate all participant information in PERS pension programs from state employer to benefit provider. However, challenges with size, scope, and a traditional implementation approach caused the project to stall. In December 2009, PERS executives and Board elected to continue the effort, but directed the adoption of a new approach. In March 2010, PERS initiated the PSR Recovery Plan project with an innovative, holistic approach which included embedding collaboration and communications in every phase, streamlining governance, using a metrics-driven methodology to measure performance, assess readiness, and rapidly recover problem areas. More than 3,000 employers and 125 business providers came together to form a more collaborative business partner community. Additionally, over 550 vendor and PERS staff located in California and India learned to work closely together to build a solution to meet the needs of the entire community. Key metrics following the implementation of my CalPERS on September 19, 2011 illustrate the significant success of this turnaround effort: All health and retirement benefits have been paid on time. Over $6 billion has been paid in benefits to nearly 500,000 state and public agency workers. More than $10 billion in contributions and 10 million transactions have been processed. Over 460,000 page views are accessed each day with an average response time of 2 seconds across the exchange. Since launch, only 2 hours of unplanned downtime have occurred. By December, 2011, 93% of the 3,000 state and public agency employers, and 100% of the 125 business providers used my CalPERS to manage benefits. Business partners workload for data clean-up and reconciliation has been reduced by more than 85% while the integrated platform has reduced the time to implement changes by 83%. The PSR Recovery Plan rescued a very large, high-risk project by developing a holistic, collaborative, agile, metrics-driven approach. Its methodologies can be scaled and applied to any project, especially those designed to manage business community partnerships. This modernization initiative now allows more than 3,000 employers and 125 benefits providers to immediately reconcile 1.6 million member accounts from origin to completion, resulting in faster, more efficient service across the community. 1 CalPERS PSR Recovery Plan

3 BUSINESS PROBLEM AND SOLUTION DESCRIPTION Problem: Recovering an Enormous, Failing Project California s Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS or PERS ) coordinates benefits among more than 3,125 business partners (public employers and private providers) on behalf of more than 1.6 million California public employees, retirees, and their families. To manage benefits, PERS relied on 109 siloed, often antiquated systems that lacked centralized coordination or self-service for business partners or members. The lack of coordination between systems and error-prone reporting by business partners led to data gaps in retirees information and inaccuracies in PERS 3 billion records. These gaps required painstaking resolution to pay benefits. In addition, many of the 109 legacy systems could not meet upcoming privacy or health care regulations. Business partners and PERS members needed self-service options to efficiently access vital information. To address these issues and modernize its systems: In 1995, PERS initiated a project to address system issues. The task was much larger and more complex than expected. The project completed an initiative for Year 2000 processing before suspending activities for further planning. In 2006, PERS launched the Pension System Resumption (PSR) Project. PSR s objective was to consolidate PERS systems and connect more than 3,125 business partners into one exchange network serving CalPERS vast pension and health care programs. By mid-2009, the project was failing due to size, scope, and a traditional implementation approach that did not provide adequate collaboration between the business community, vendor and PERS staff. In December 2009, the PERS executives and Board directed the adoption of a recovery plan with a new approach and a hard implementation date of September 19, 2011. The recovery plan had a short timeframe to restart and implement a large, complex, highrisk project. The systems integrator agreed to waive further fees, while PERS, with nearly 80% of the $500 million total cost already encumbered, was determined to do whatever it took for the recovery effort to succeed. Solution Between January and March 2010, new project leadership for PERS and the integrator revised the entire project framework. This included re-scoping, re-chartering, and rebaselining the project and required functionality for go live. PERS and the integrator committed to the September 19 deadline, leaving 18 months to complete the system. The Recovery Plan was compounded by the size and scope of the change: my CalPERS was building an integrated system with a common look and feel across business processes for PERS employees and business partners. This involved retiring 200 interfaces, 90 databases, and 109 systems, plus outreach to the 3,125 business partners and 1,800 PERS staff to get input and prepare them for the change. The project involved over 550 staff on 50 sub-projects. The my CalPERS System included: A single platform with 3 billion records, 80 million document images, and 108 interface frameworks for storage and retrieval across all business programs. 2 CalPERS PSR Recovery Plan

A robust rules engine to provide process integrity and customer confidence. 24/7 service options for business partners at launch, expanding to beneficiaries. Data edits and pre-populated eforms to accept and process information electronically, eliminating dependency on paper documents. Over 64,000 artifacts, 45,000 modules, 640 screens, 1,605 tables, and nearly 1,000 forms implemented through 202 major system deliverables. Modifying more than 80% of the previously-developed code to resolve design gaps; the new code base was 2.3 million lines of code. Correcting over 3 million partner data anomalies to ensure valid data. Project leaders took an innovative, holistic approach as traditional approaches had not worked. Key areas included embedding collaboration in every phase, streamlining governance, and a metrics-driven approach to develop the project, test readiness, and rapidly recover any area that threatened the project s success. Empirical Metrics-driven Project Management: The September 19 deadline drove project managers to know exactly where sub-teams were at all times. This resulted in an interlinked performance measurement system with detailed goals for each activity as a common basis for status and measurement. Co-led blended teams defined unit-level goals by week and by day for requirements, designs, builds, test scripts, test executions, data corrections, data conversions/ validations, etc. The Project Management Office (PMO) tracked hourly and daily progress and recorded goals in the master schedule based on earned value (on time =1, 5% ahead =1.05, 5% behind=.95) that reinforced the importance of daily productivity to each member of the 550+ team. Decision points about priorities, resources, and tactics were reviewed twice weekly in tactical cross-team (SWAT) meetings, leading to early decisions, which mitigated risks and minimized delays. Detailed statistics combined with collaboration meant that teams ahead of schedule helped those that fell behind. The master schedule tracked more than 9,000 major activities. Monitors positioned throughout the organization displayed daily progress. Collaboration: The Recovery Plan required collaborative development with the system integrator and CalPERS staff working side by side to build requirements, system components, test scripts, conversion maps, and readiness preparations. Each of the 50 teams had a leader from both the integrator and PERS. The collaborative environment eliminated assumptions and communication gaps, helping to identify and resolve issues before they could delay the project. The Public Employer Readiness Team (PERT) outreach program involved all external business partners under a separate project focused on ensuring correct requirements, participation, and preparation of the external business partner community for the new system. PERT s focus on gathering input from business partners meant internal PSR staff could focus on designing, developing, testing and integrating the my CalPERS system. PERT engagement started in mid-2010 and continued past implementation. The Enterprise Transition Management (ETM) project focused on change management, 3 CalPERS PSR Recovery Plan

internal communications, and education for CalPERS employees. ETM trained over 1,800 CalPERS staff (99% of goal) between June and early September 2011. Communications: Sharing Progress and Direction: A comprehensive Communications Office fostered team dynamics and integrated internal and external messaging. Over 21,000 emails, 13,500 phone calls, and untold meetings, were held with business partners to keep them involved. Communications sharing included: Twice-weekly SWAT meetings to address performance or progress issues. Decision logs captured risks, issues, and resolutions for immediate notification. External communications included press releases and media coverage. PSR Portal was a tool for governance, collaboration, social medial or the Project Workbench to access working documents, deliverables, plans, and progress. Times Square style broadcasts continuously shared progress in critical areas. The Project Director issued monthly updates. The PERS CIO hosted milestone recognition events. The CEO provided monthly updates to all PERS staff. Streamlined Governance Improved and Accelerated Decisions: Project leaders streamlined governance to expedite key decisions, opening lines of communication through all levels of the organization that focused on expediting decisions. Having set direction in the recovery plan, project executives transitioned to make strategic-level project decisions such as external communication strategies, business policies, and cutover service freezes. The project Steering Committee transitioned to make workinglevel project decisions. A project advisory committee, transitioned from business advisors to advising on working-level project decisions. Implementation and Testing: The Recovery Plan Reviewed over 50,000 pages of high-level and PSR detailed-design documentation, and developed efficient approaches to developing, testing, and implementing the my CalPERS system. Testing included: 1,200 business scenarios averaging 75 steps per scenario for Customer Acceptance Testing. Inviting 600 business partners to validation testing. Detecting 61,000 errors and correcting all high-severity errors before launch. Privacy, Security, and Accessibility: Ensuring members information remains secure, and accessibility for people with disabilities was built into the Recovery Plan. In addition to 128 bit SSL transmission encryption and data file-level encryption, staff ran 80,000 security tests along with over 25,000 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) tests, to ensure privacy and accessibility for all users. Cost: The PSR project cost $500 million in total. The PSR Recovery Plan portion cost $70 million, covering the period from March 2010 through post-implementation support December 2011. The ETM and PERT teams were separately funded at approximately $12 million and $7 million, respectively, during this period. The systems integrator paid its own costs during the Recovery Plan and did not provide a cost estimate. 4 CalPERS PSR Recovery Plan

Innovative Characteristics: The PSR Recovery Plan project includes innovations in system development methodology and system function that make the my CalPERS system unique among state pension systems. System Implementation Innovations include: Blended project teams meant system integrator and CalPERS staff sat side by side with a shared commitment to success but with fewer impediments. The comprehensive performance management system had goals for each activity that were empirically measured, with daily updates and reviews. Streamlined governance management accelerated decisions. Testing aligned with the new business model from origin to completion. Holistic change management and communications strategy included separately chartered outreach campaigns for 3,125 business partners and 1,800 PERS staff to incorporate the customers voice from requirements beyond implementation. my CalPERS System Usability Innovations include: Business partners frequent activities are cloned, to carry forward recurrent data and report only changes, reducing labor and improving data accuracy. Each business partner receives their own home page to access and optimize their working space to their culture and style. Leverage and Transferability: The PSR Recovery Plan project approach, or pieces of it, can be adopted by any project. The transferable elements include engaging all stakeholders as partners to increase collaborative outcomes and continuously measuring and sharing progress to reach a new level of agile project management. California agencies already use lessons from PERS conversion of 3 billion records. 4 SIGNIFICANCE After traditional approaches twice foundered, the PSR Recovery Plan succeeded by integrating communication, collaboration, and metrics driven status into the DNA of the project. Key areas of significance to government include: Using collaboration to convince the thousands of business partners to participate in the development of an integrated benefits information exchange. Empirically measuring daily progress to identify issues, engender responsibility and enthusiasm, and ensure success. Adopting agile blended team techniques to accelerate design, development and testing while reducing rework and errors. Communications programs to build commitment, excitement, and mitigate press. By December, 2011, 93% of the 3,000 public employers, and 100% of the 125 business providers used my CalPERS daily to report and manage benefits. The transferability and scalability of the PSR Recovery Plan s agile project management approach can be adapted to other projects. Alignment: The PSR Recovery Plan project s goals are directly aligned with Governor Brown s priorities of reducing state costs and improving state efficiencies. The project directly supports and aligns with: 5 CalPERS PSR Recovery Plan

Goal 3 of the Statewide IT Strategic Plan: Efficient, Consolidated, and Reliable Infrastructure and Services; and Goal 4 of the Statewide IT Strategic Plan: Information is an Asset The PSR Recovery Plan directly supports NASCIO s priorities of consolidation/ optimization, cost control, improving health care services, and security. 5 BENEFIT OF THE PROJECT Improving Outcomes for Business Partners and Giving Back to Public Employees The PSR Recovery Plan used collaborative, data-driven methodologies to rescue a failing project and complete a consolidated health and retirement benefits information exchange to better serve 1.6 million members and over 3125 business partners. Cost Avoidance of Delays or Failure: Without the PSR Recovery Plan project, the $500 million my CalPERS system would have failed. Replacement cost for a future effort would likely double the investment. A non-functioning system would have very little re-use. Alternatively, project delay costs in the event that the project schedule needed to be extended to the next available conversion window would have added another $35-50 million, excluding vendor costs, and $50-100 million if vendor costs were included. Less Maintenance: By moving from outdated, siloed systems to a single platform, PERS reduced consultant support and licensing costs by 25%. Actuarial changes that required six months now take only one (83% reduction). System efficiencies: my CalPERS has already reduced PERS and business partners workload for known data clean-up and reconciliation by more than 85%; my CalPERS eliminates paper through an analytical work environment and task automation. Business partners have 24/7 access to an integrated system that provides uniform retirement and health-related information across the community while addressing all partner and regulatory business requirements. Partner adoption: Business partners and PERS staff were ready for the significant my CalPERS changes due to extensive project communications and separate outreach programs focused solely on incorporating partners voice. Ensuring Compliance: Since launch, my CalPERS has paid over $6 billion in benefits to more than 500,000 public agency workers. Over $10 billion in new contributions and over 10 million transactions have been processed. my CalPERS uniform business rules ensure adherence to laws, regulations, and policies. In summary, the PSR Recovery Plan s holistic, collaborative, agile, metrics driven approach shows how a public agency can rescue a large, failing project. The PSR Recovery Plan is somewhat unique in achieving success after two problem projects but its methodologies can be scaled and applied to any project beginning at initiation. The my CalPERS system went live on September 19, 2011, as promised, providing an integrated information exchange system that improves how employers, providers, and PERS manage member benefits. This results in better, more efficient service to the 1.6 million members and 3,000+ employers in the CalPERS pension and health programs. 6 CalPERS PSR Recovery Plan